45:
518:. We don't junk up articles with every variation of a photograph just so they all technically meet the featured picture criteria. Only a single photograph from a nomination needs to be in the article to qualify all the alts. Whichever photo wins should be used in the article(s). Remember, our primary concern here is improving articles, not winning contests. Having two or more essentially identical photos in the same article is ridiculous.
163:
34:
102:
here) and more developed (with an actual stalk and leaves). Also I could wish for having a sectioned individual next to it in addition. The availability of potatoes to everyone make those wishes not so unreal. About the picture itself, I think the light is too bright on the potato (mostly to the left). But this probably can be solved doing some little tweaks.
424:
Thanks. As I said once it makes me worried that the boundary of point 5.1 of FP criteria can be pushed too much. (all the previous supports were given when this point was being violated) The danger is still there. For example, the alt is now (woops, this now is the now of a past time. it was now when
478:
All I know is that it's a russet potato as noted on the packaging. The russet article redirects to Russet
Burbank which IMO is misguided. There are several types of russets forming even more category trees (thanks to these brilliant people called botanists) but some are just hybrids belonging to the
532:
It wasn't intended for a winning championship. I just find alts difficult to arrange which is why I prefer a single image for a nomination. Of course, I could have changed my mind and use the original to go by the FPC process with this given advice , but I could see you already fixed it yourself.
582:
The original is about 10 cm (4 inch) and the alt is about 4 1/2 inches (11.5 cm) including the sprout at the end. Typically normal. Since I don't know the measurements precisely, I decided not to embed a scale and play guessing games; instead I have posted it on the file page. Scales suit macros
101:
I guess the topic is dangerous. Even if all technical details are optimal the search for the optimal photograph can have many approaches in this case. For example I could wish in this case for having an individual with the three sprouts in three different stages: incipient, small (like the three
380:
Is the Alt 1 going to be added to the article, or to replace the
Original in it? Some little care should be taken. One thing is the nomination of pictures recently added to articles and another is images that are not even in use.
167:
290:
I have provided an alternative showing a sliced version on the left, as suggested by NYer and NS. I have updated the cultivar according to the packaging and used a few more frames on the right version during focus stacking.
213:. I think this photo needs a rather dramatic crop. It's OK to crop through the shadow, BTW, since we're not a stock photography site, i.e. we don't care about adding this potato onto white stationary and business cards :)
643:
497:
And the alt is used in potato as well, illustrating the low-starch russet. The original is only used in potato illustrating the sprouts in the description section. --
146:
I thought when Fir (and a few others) where uploading shots like these it was generally agreed that the 'type' of the fruit/vegetable should be identified. --
633:
433:
is less risky. The other requires a more careful study. A specialist or a source can tell whether the differences that I see in potatoes in the article
17:
638:
619:
596:
573:
546:
527:
510:
492:
471:
449:
415:
393:
375:
358:
341:
326:
304:
279:
261:
239:
222:
201:
179:
155:
137:
114:
96:
458:
Just so you know, if an edit or alternate is promoted, it will replace the original nominee in an article, no matter what.
371:
275:
235:
569:
465:
434:
426:
319:
130:
44:
367:
271:
231:
590:
565:
540:
523:
504:
486:
409:
354:
298:
255:
230:
Personally I'd ask for a cross section and focus stacking given that it isn't hard to repeat.
218:
195:
90:
460:
440:
384:
335:
314:
125:
105:
175:
162:
151:
627:
585:
535:
519:
499:
481:
404:
350:
293:
250:
214:
190:
85:
73:
33:
608:
171:
147:
188:
russet, and I think Fir's is a type of tuber (Russet
Burbank maybe?).
437:
are of a level that doesn't affect being in the same classification.
430:
185:
65:
43:
32:
123:
for good general representation of a potato... that can see. âť„
605:
Promoted File:Russet potato cultivar with sprouts.jpg
402:
Both images are now in their designated article. --
429:. Has it been properly identified? Placing it in
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
644:Featured picture nominations/December 2009
7:
160:FWIW, a different previously failed
59:Remarkable DOF, recommended at PPR.
634:Ended featured picture nominations
312:More than enough detail for FP. âť„
51:- With sliced version for more EV.
24:
349:. As long as no scale is added.
161:
62:Articles this image appears in
1:
425:I was writing.) only used in
327:05:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
305:22:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
280:04:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
262:02:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
240:23:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
223:21:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
202:16:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
180:12:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
156:12:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
138:23:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
115:19:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
97:18:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
639:Featured picture nominations
620:12:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
597:01:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
574:16:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
547:04:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
528:21:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
511:17:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
493:17:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
472:07:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
450:05:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
416:05:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
394:05:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
376:20:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
359:20:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
342:20:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
660:
479:upper class potatoes. --
166:potato image FP nom and
184:I believe it is a high
40:- A potato with sprouts
28:Potato with sprouts.jpg
583:better IMO anyways. --
52:
41:
435:Russet Burbank potato
427:Russet Burbank potato
47:
36:
248:It's focus stacked.
81:Support as nominator
53:
42:
448:
392:
113:
651:
615:
612:
593:
588:
564:Needs a scale.
543:
538:
507:
502:
489:
484:
468:
463:
447:
445:
438:
412:
407:
391:
389:
382:
338:
322:
317:
301:
296:
258:
253:
198:
193:
165:
133:
128:
112:
110:
103:
93:
88:
659:
658:
654:
653:
652:
650:
649:
648:
624:
623:
613:
610:
591:
586:
541:
536:
505:
500:
487:
482:
466:
461:
441:
439:
410:
405:
385:
383:
336:
320:
315:
299:
294:
256:
251:
196:
191:
131:
126:
106:
104:
91:
86:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
657:
655:
647:
646:
641:
636:
626:
625:
602:
601:
600:
599:
577:
576:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
495:
476:
475:
474:
453:
452:
419:
418:
397:
396:
378:
361:
344:
329:
307:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
265:
264:
243:
242:
225:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
141:
117:
99:
77:
76:
71:
68:
63:
60:
57:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
656:
645:
642:
640:
637:
635:
632:
631:
629:
622:
621:
617:
616:
606:
598:
595:
594:
589:
581:
580:
579:
578:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
559:
548:
545:
544:
539:
531:
530:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
513:
512:
509:
508:
503:
496:
494:
491:
490:
485:
477:
473:
470:
469:
464:
457:
456:
455:
454:
451:
446:
444:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
414:
413:
408:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
390:
388:
379:
377:
373:
369:
368:Noodle snacks
365:
364:Support Alt 1
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:Support Alt 1
345:
343:
340:
339:
333:
332:Support Alt 1
330:
328:
324:
323:
318:
311:
310:Support Alt 1
308:
306:
303:
302:
297:
289:
288:
281:
277:
273:
272:Noodle snacks
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
260:
259:
254:
247:
246:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
232:Noodle snacks
229:
226:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
203:
200:
199:
194:
187:
183:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
140:
139:
135:
134:
129:
122:
118:
116:
111:
109:
100:
98:
95:
94:
89:
82:
79:
78:
75:
72:
69:
67:
64:
61:
58:
55:
54:
50:
46:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
609:
604:
603:
584:
566:Spikebrennan
561:
534:
515:
498:
480:
459:
442:
403:
386:
363:
346:
334:
331:
313:
309:
292:
270:My mistake.
249:
227:
210:
189:
143:
124:
120:
119:
107:
84:
80:
48:
37:
27:
337:Jujutacular
628:Categories
443:franklin
387:franklin
108:franklin
516:No No No
168:it's nom
144:Comment.
38:Original
562:Comment
520:Kaldari
462:upstate
351:Kaldari
316:upstate
228:Comment
215:Kaldari
211:Comment
127:upstate
121:Support
74:ZooFari
70:Creator
431:potato
366:Only.
186:starch
66:Potato
56:Reason
172:jjron
148:jjron
49:Alt 1
16:<
592:Fari
570:talk
542:Fari
524:talk
506:Fari
488:Fari
467:NYer
411:Fari
372:talk
355:talk
321:NYer
300:Fari
276:talk
257:Fari
236:talk
219:talk
197:Fari
176:talk
170:. --
152:talk
132:NYer
92:Fari
614:din
611:Mae
587:Zoo
537:Zoo
501:Zoo
483:Zoo
406:Zoo
295:Zoo
252:Zoo
192:Zoo
87:Zoo
630::
618:\
572:)
533:--
526:)
374:)
357:)
325:âť„
278:)
238:)
221:)
178:)
154:)
136:âť„
83:--
607:—
568:(
522:(
370:(
353:(
274:(
234:(
217:(
174:(
150:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
