147:
tags in there were added by myself, a decent number weren't and all of them need addressing anyway. References are thorough in a couple of sections (like "Genre"), but sparse for most of the article. For instance, the long analytical "Recurring themes and concepts" section has only 4 sources, 3 of
179:). Are there reliable sources somewhere that go into more detail? If not, the subsection is far too small (one sentence!) to be left on its own, and should be incorporated into some other part of "Reception". (The main section "Genre" might also have the same problem.)
182:
I'm sure I've neglected to mention many issues the article has, but just the referencing issue means it fails GA criteria. The article hasn't been reviewed since 2007 (and I would say it should have been delisted then): it definitely doesn't meet the criteria now. —
156:
166:
The sales subsection could perhaps do with some expansion — I know, for instance, that not all of those 41 language editions will have printed the whole 13-book series of ASOUE (and very few supplementary works like
69:
65:
50:
160:
42:
172:
148:
which are just sources to the books next to quotes taken out of them. I'm sure it would be a great piece of writing on a fansite or forum, but is not referenced.
196:
118:
58:
17:
112:
155:), although I'm not an expert in this area: while the book set picture of the English version is fair use, as I would expect,
35:
168:
104:
191:
210:
98:
152:
134:
204:
126:
185:
141:
130:
157:
File:Série de livres Les désastreuses aventures des orphelins
Baudelaire.JPG
96:: No opposition. Obvious citation and original research issues. Delisted.
85:
77:
46:
163:(the French and Czech translations) are from Commons.
151:There also seems to be an issue with images (
8:
7:
18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment
24:
161:File:Řada nešťastných příhod.jpg
125:The article has a problem with
86:Watch article reassessment page
28:A Series of Unfortunate Events
1:
197:12:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
227:
119:03:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
137:): although many of the
89:• GAN review not found
127:original research
115:
107:
218:
146:
140:
113:
105:
101:
97:
88:
82:
73:
54:
226:
225:
221:
220:
219:
217:
216:
215:
201:
200:
195:
144:
138:
99:
92:
84:
63:
40:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
224:
222:
214:
213:
203:
202:
189:
123:
122:
121:
90:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
223:
212:
209:
208:
206:
199:
198:
194:
193:
188:
187:
180:
178:
174:
170:
164:
162:
158:
154:
149:
143:
136:
132:
131:verifiability
128:
120:
116:
111:
108:
102:
95:
91:
87:
81:
80:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
190:
184:
181:
176:
165:
150:
124:
109:
93:
78:
74:
60:Article talk
59:
55:
36:
27:
177:Horseradish
47:visual edit
100:DragonZero
205:Category
114:Contribs
70:history
51:history
37:Article
211:GAR/60
192:(talk)
186:Bilorv
94:Result
133:(see
79:Watch
16:<
159:and
106:Talk
66:edit
43:edit
175:or
173:TUA
171:or
169:TBL
207::
153:6a
145:}}
142:cn
139:{{
135:2c
117:)
83:•
68:|
49:|
45:|
129:/
110:·
103:(
75:·
72:)
64:(
56:·
53:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.