151:, agree with Sanmosa. Additionally, some information given in the article is even wrong, and some are collected in irrelevant sources. The corresponding page in zhwiki has improved a lot during June, I believe that volunteers can translated those contents into enwiki.
127:
As what I've just found, there are original researches for the contents citing the source "Greenhill, Blust & Gray 2008", and the article may not meet the second good article criterion: "Verifiable with
223:
For example, the source "Greenhill, Blust & Gray 2008" is just a list of 210 words, but the paragraph using this source said that "E morphology is primarily analytic", I believe that this is a typical
236:, "However, it contains a few unusual consonants ... All are voiceless versions of consonants that, in most languages, are always voiced". That is the editor's own summary with bias, since
247:. Speaking of the language's phonology, the consonant table and the vowel table were inducted from the word list by the editor, but how can you guarantee if all the
232:
mentioned "(E language) contains a few rare phonemes: voiceless versions of the more common nasal consonants and alveolar lateral approximant", and the
69:
17:
204:
112:
274:
unchanged. Let alone the tone contours table is wrong. Above all, I think this article does not meet the standard of Good
Article.
195:
could some details of the OR and inaccuracies be given? No one has edited this article or the talk page since the GAR was filed. –
65:
50:
139:
42:
208:
116:
283:
211:
187:
160:
142:
119:
271:
267:
263:
259:
252:
200:
108:
244:
177:
279:
156:
90:
256:
218:
196:
136:
104:
251:
of the language coincidentally appeared in these 210 words? Plus, you can find the consonant
170:
300:
58:
181:
275:
152:
294:
225:
133:
100:
233:
229:
35:
237:
240:
248:
255:
in the list, but it is not in the table; the list contains the
132:" (Criterion 2c. "It contains no original research…").
85:
77:
46:
262:, the editor changed it into a single consonant
8:
168:, agree with Sanmosa n' TongcyDai. ——
7:
18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment
24:
86:Watch article reassessment page
284:12:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
120:12:28, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
212:09:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
103:concerns outlined below. –
317:
188:09:06, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
161:09:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
143:02:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
243:are actually common in
130:no original research
228:. Another example,
99:: Delisted due to
91:Most recent review
257:consonant cluster
245:Kam–Sui languages
234:phonology section
226:original research
101:original research
308:
273:
269:
265:
261:
254:
230:the lead section
222:
182:Chinese userpage
122:
88:
82:
73:
54:
316:
315:
311:
310:
309:
307:
306:
305:
291:
290:
216:
186:
95:
84:
63:
40:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
314:
312:
304:
303:
293:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
190:
174:
163:
125:
124:
123:
93:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
313:
302:
299:
298:
296:
285:
281:
277:
258:
250:
246:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
220:
215:
214:
213:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
184:
183:
179:
173:
172:
167:
164:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
121:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
92:
87:
81:
80:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
219:Filelakeshoe
197:filelakeshoe
192:
176:
169:
165:
148:
129:
126:
105:filelakeshoe
96:
78:
74:
60:Article talk
59:
55:
36:
27:
266:, yet left
47:visual edit
28:E language
276:TongcyDai
238:voiceless
153:TongcyDai
295:Category
249:phonemes
241:sonorant
171:Eric Liu
193:Comment
70:history
51:history
37:Article
301:GAR/64
166:Delist
149:Delist
97:Result
79:Watch
16:<
280:talk
272:/hw/
270:and
268:/ŋw/
264:/kʷ/
260:/kw/
253:/tɕ/
178:Talk
157:talk
66:edit
43:edit
134:Σαν
297::
282:)
209:🐱
207:)
203:/
159:)
140:σα
137:μο
117:🐱
115:)
111:/
89:•
83:•
68:|
49:|
45:|
278:(
221::
217:@
205:c
201:t
199:(
185:）
180:．
175:（
155:(
113:c
109:t
107:(
75:·
72:)
64:(
56:·
53:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.