169:
Hi, thanks for the notification. I did the GA review, and I agree it would be nice to have more company history, but I was unable to find evidence that sources had been omitted. The scandals are what seems to have made it newsworthy, and I think it's likely there's little or no other coverage.
201:
For more history, there is nothing to add if you don't want to use paid-for non-RS sources. Several of these were removed during the GAN. As said above, the main reason why this company is known is because of the scandal. There are a few RS from before that, and those are already in the
139:
Having read the page, I'm not confident the page is broad enough in content. The whole company history is covered in a couple of short paragraphs, and quite a lot of detail of interest is skipped over (ranging from more on the founders, early days, iterations, scaling up
170:
Lack of coverage of an area doesn't make an article ineligible for GA, so I don't think there's a problem there. That also means more citations are not very likely to be found. Illustrations are not required for GA.
114:- while participants agree it would be nice if the article were more broad, no evidence of omitted references were found. The other two proposed reasons for a delist are not supported by the
208:
Partially the same as the first note: no sources. For quotes—I don't know what you'd want. There are a few quotes from the owners, but I don't see them being really encyclopedic.
151:
143:
The article could be illustrated, which it currently isn't (and the logo not having the background removed could be fixed to make the page cleaner).
17:
183:
179:
135:
Hi all. I came across this page reading through the engineering and technology GA pages, and think it still may need some work.
80:
226:
And yes, if anyone was wondering, the whole point of getting this to GA status was to run it on DYK with the criticizing hook.
205:
A screenshot of the main page was suggested on the GAN, but that's currently blanked. I can't think of anything else to add.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
246:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
194:
So first, I honestly couldn't care if this was delisted. I'm not active here anymore, though having it stay would be nice.
76:
159:
61:
53:
115:
175:
234:
221:
187:
163:
155:
128:
171:
101:
146:
I think more citations would be great too, to illustrate the topic. Possibly use of quotes.
259:
124:
253:
69:
227:
214:
120:
46:
96:
88:
57:
154:. Would be great to get some community insight.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Good article reassessment
150:To me, the page feels like it would fit
7:
35:The following discussion is closed.
24:
213:So yeah, those are my two cents.
242:The discussion above is closed.
97:Watch article reassessment page
1:
235:21:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
222:21:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
188:21:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
164:21:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
129:19:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
276:
244:Please do not modify it.
37:Please do not modify it.
102:Most recent review
38:
156:SerAntoniDeMiloni
36:
267:
232:
219:
119:
99:
93:
84:
65:
275:
274:
270:
269:
268:
266:
265:
264:
250:
249:
248:
247:
228:
215:
106:
95:
74:
51:
45:
41:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
273:
271:
263:
262:
252:
251:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
211:
210:
209:
206:
203:
196:
195:
191:
190:
148:
147:
144:
141:
133:
132:
131:
116:WP:GA criteria
104:
42:
33:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
272:
261:
258:
257:
255:
245:
236:
233:
231:
225:
224:
223:
220:
218:
212:
207:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
172:Mike Christie
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
145:
142:
138:
137:
136:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
103:
98:
92:
91:
87:
82:
78:
73:
72:
68:
63:
59:
55:
50:
49:
44:
43:
40:
29:
26:
19:
243:
229:
216:
149:
134:
111:
107:
89:
85:
71:Article talk
70:
66:
47:
34:
27:
58:visual edit
121:—Femke 🐦
254:Category
202:article.
180:contribs
184:library
152:B-class
81:history
62:history
48:Article
28:Geliyoo
260:GAR/67
230:~Styyx
217:~Styyx
108:Result
140:etc).
90:Watch
16:<
176:talk
160:talk
125:talk
112:Kept
77:edit
54:edit
182:-
256::
186:)
178:-
162:)
127:)
110::
100:•
94:•
79:|
60:|
56:|
174:(
158:(
123:(
118:.
86:·
83:)
75:(
67:·
64:)
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.