165:
referenced information and filling in information gaps. We can do this with other periodic table group that are Start-Class or C-Class so we can get them to B-Class and good articles as well. I agree that we do need more information on the Groups and
Periods articles but that we shouldn’t put everything - just the major and important facts and knowledge that fill in the gaps.
164:
Just because there is information lacking in these sections doesn’t mean that we should demote it from good article status. Instead, we should get referenced information about this from the individual elements’ articles. That way, we do not need to demote the article while putting new, properly
114:- Not enough discussion to get a solid conclusion here, but it's been open for 6 months. Quantity of media is not a GA criterion, and people disagree about whether the biological occurances section expansion is necessary to keep GA status.
80:
131:
I don't think that this article meets the criteria as there is not a lot of media, and precautions and biological occurences could be expanded.
17:
76:
61:
150:
in the articles on the individual elements: this can very well be a summary article that focuses on things common to the whole group.
199:
170:
53:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
213:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
146:
Yeah, biocompatibility of Ti should probably be mentioned. That said, I don't think there's much of a need to duplicate
195:
166:
203:
188:
174:
159:
140:
124:
183:
101:
155:
185:
182:
So, what shall we conclude with? It has been 6 months since the original reassessment has been started.
69:
136:
151:
194:
I would keep it as a GA-Class article, because it mostly adequately summarises the elements.
226:
120:
46:
132:
220:
116:
96:
88:
57:
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Good article reassessment
7:
35:The following discussion is closed.
24:
209:The discussion above is closed.
97:Watch article reassessment page
125:14:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
175:18:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
160:00:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
141:20:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
204:10:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
189:19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
243:
211:Please do not modify it.
37:Please do not modify it.
196:InterstellarGamer12321
167:InterstellarGamer12321
112:No consensus to delist
102:Most recent review
38:
36:
234:
115:
99:
93:
84:
65:
242:
241:
237:
236:
235:
233:
232:
231:
217:
216:
215:
214:
106:
95:
74:
51:
45:
41:
31:
28:Group 4 element
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
240:
238:
230:
229:
219:
218:
208:
207:
206:
180:
179:
178:
177:
129:
128:
127:
104:
42:
33:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
239:
228:
225:
224:
222:
212:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
191:
190:
187:
184:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
103:
98:
92:
91:
87:
82:
78:
73:
72:
68:
63:
59:
55:
50:
49:
44:
43:
40:
29:
26:
19:
210:
181:
152:Double sharp
147:
130:
111:
107:
89:
85:
71:Article talk
70:
66:
47:
34:
27:
58:visual edit
148:everything
133:Bli231957
221:Category
81:history
62:history
48:Article
227:GAR/67
108:Result
117:Femke
90:Watch
16:<
200:talk
171:talk
156:talk
137:talk
121:talk
77:edit
54:edit
223::
202:)
186:Pr
173:)
158:)
139:)
123:)
110::
100:•
94:•
79:|
60:|
56:|
198:(
169:(
154:(
135:(
119:(
86:·
83:)
75:(
67:·
64:)
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.