Knowledge (XXG)

:I just don't like it - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

237:, a reference work. To decide what should be in it purely on the basis of what is merely popular or interesting to whatever small group of editors happens to be around at the time that a discussion is had, is to head down the road towards chaos and confusion. Knowledge (XXG)'s editing community comprises a broad spectrum of people from around the world, and what is uninteresting and dislikable to some is of vital interest to others. It is neither productive nor desired to have multiple groups of editors trying to out-"vote" one another, treating editorial decisions on content and topics as popularity contests. We have had experience of this in years gone by, and it did not lead to the betterment of the encyclopaedia. Human knowledge is what Knowledge (XXG) covers, and its extent is determined by the world at large, as documented and recorded in reliable sources, not by us as editors choosing what we personally consider to be popular. Again, we base our arguments upon what sources say, not upon our personal likes and dislikes. 134: 35: 119: 416:
Ray makes a further important observation: the people who, in her words, "reject objectivity and facts to find truth" are likely to ascribe those same methods to their opponents, because it is "entirely consistent with their beliefs" that everyone else does as they do. Nonetheless, that does not make
288:
It is certainly fair to argue that changing something might make that something easier for novices but would be a problem for experienced editors used to the current situation. But an editor who simply says "I like it" is being intellectually dishonest by failing to acknowledge the first half of this
320:
Just as in other contexts, merely stating one's opinion about someone else, or their behavior, is not helpful or useful to others. Identify and explain the reasons for the opinion that you hold. Focus on the result (actual edits to articles, policy pages, talk pages, etc.) of the actions at issue,
176:
At Knowledge (XXG), we require the opposite to apply. Emotion does not trump logic. The point of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to describe what you "like" or "don't like". We are not trying to "win" what Steele and Beasor characterize as a "game". Knowledge (XXG) is not a business
370:
How can logic deal with such an attitude? It is very difficult – how often I've had the experience of answering every objection raised by our otherwise reasonable opponent who then responds, "I'm sorry. I know you're probably right, but I just don't like it!" Or as expressed by a representative ,
284:
When discussing whether a particular aspect of the Knowledge (XXG) user interface should be changed to be easier for novices, it is not uncommon for experienced editors to say, of that aspect, "I like it." Typically this is phrased as "I don't have any problems with that" or "It's easy for me" or
391:
to do is to sink to that level oneself. "I just like it."/"I just don't like it." is as weak and feeble an argument in rebuttal of its opposite as it is weak and feeble in counterargument to any other point. One may point out that such arguments are subjective, have no bases in Knowledge (XXG)
451:
Ideally you want to read an intelligent account of what you've attempted to do and you want argument about the reasons it has or has not been achieved. You don't want someone saying, "I didn't like it. It's not for me." That's completely subjective; that's personal chemistry. When you read a
3154: 1194: 272:"This is a contentious issue; leave it be". Well, of course. If it weren't a contentious issue, there would be no discussion. Please evaluate the arguments on both sides with respect to the principal naming criteria from a neutral point of view and explain your position. 524:
Kiparsky, as cited in Lasnik, observes that, from the point of view of strict logical construction, "I don't like it" does not actually mean "I dislike it", although that is what speakers sometimes intend it to mean. In linguistics, this sort of transformation is called
2355: 1759: 396:
simply try to out-vote such arguments with their opposites. Knowledge (XXG) is not helped by a return to the practices of yesteryear with gangs of editors organizing argument-free collections of block votes. Knowledge (XXG) is organized through
1224: 275:"There is no consensus for this". Although this can be an appropriate response when an editor disagrees with another editor's assessment of a move discussion, it is not a substantive reason to oppose a move during the discussion itself. 3041: 2490: 2921: 2093: 2450: 2259: 1854: 285:"I've gotten used to it that way". All of these are variants on expressing the personal opinion that "I like it". None are relevant to the question of whether the user interface aspect is a problem for novice editors. 3294: 321:
not the person who did them, and explain how those results are consistent with, or contrary to, policy, guidelines, conventions or the good of the encyclopedia. Give specific examples, normally identified with diffs.
1561: 3234: 2981: 2602: 1239: 3304: 3046: 906: 3570: 3565: 2856: 481:
explains, discussion pages at Knowledge (XXG) are not for voicing and debating our personal opinions on subjects. They are there for discussing the writing and editing of the encyclopaedia. Talk pages are
3359: 1659: 3344: 452:
well-argued review and it says, "I don't like it because of x, y, and z.", although at the time you rage against what the critic has said, maybe two or three months later you think, "They were right."
3094: 1634: 1689: 1386: 3662: 3364: 2771: 1957: 1411: 1334: 916: 1536: 966: 956: 2811: 2791: 1754: 1724: 184:, called "I just don't like it" a "feeble argument". In Knowledge (XXG) discussions, that argument, and its counterpart "I just like it", are feeble and should be given no weight whatsoever. 1036: 2048: 1774: 1051: 991: 1124: 3509: 1456: 2816: 2896: 2851: 2761: 2711: 1977: 1704: 1679: 406: 230: 3618: 3404: 1694: 1329: 1314: 1026: 2731: 1294: 2886: 2801: 1917: 1769: 1674: 1289: 1249: 1104: 3514: 2607: 2520: 2118: 1859: 1684: 1609: 1344: 1319: 1244: 856: 815: 495: 300:
When there is acknowledgment by experienced editors that an aspect of the user interface that they like is, in fact, difficult for novices, then two things become possible:
2495: 2440: 2425: 2941: 2891: 2746: 2038: 1376: 1259: 1139: 2178: 1556: 217:
requires that we make the best efforts to leave our prejudices at the door when we edit here, be they political, social, geographic, linguistic, cultural, or otherwise.
3474: 2103: 1849: 1586: 1511: 1081: 2158: 3369: 3021: 2866: 2786: 2455: 2204: 2133: 1987: 1284: 3414: 2971: 1669: 1546: 1436: 1339: 1324: 311:
that experienced editors can select to put the user interface back to the way that they've become accustomed to. Such workarounds minimize the costs of the change.
155:, Paul Steele and Tom Beasor recommend a tactic in business negotiation, which they characterize as a "trick of the trade", called "emotion trumps logic", thusly: 1551: 926: 598:
The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, Proceedings of the International Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 1969
2956: 2926: 2736: 2485: 2480: 2017: 1466: 1421: 1351: 431:
One tell-tale characteristic of the employment of such an argument is implicit in the word "just". Part of the very problem with such arguments is that they are
3494: 2173: 469:
that like or dislike. This takes us part of the way towards what is wanted here at Knowledge (XXG). But we must take things yet further still. Not only must we
3269: 1714: 1089: 803: 3354: 1071: 715:
Global energy assessment and outlook: proceedings of the International Scientific Forum on Changes in Energy, held in Mexico City, Mexico, November 9–13, 1981
3224: 3099: 1119: 2986: 2701: 2098: 1784: 1566: 1396: 1309: 911: 1844: 1061: 3657: 3575: 2876: 2836: 2550: 2163: 2083: 1599: 1501: 1431: 1219: 3464: 3036: 2219: 197:
Editing disputes are expected to be settled by reasoned civil discourse, and editors are expected to base their arguments as to content upon what can be
2716: 2153: 1899: 1391: 931: 304:
A consensus is more likely to develop as to whether the advantages of the change, for novices, are worth the costs of the change to experienced editors.
483: 2515: 2460: 2430: 901: 3184: 3104: 1967: 355:
Dealing with such arguments comprises two separate activities: not making such arguments oneself, and addressing such arguments when made by others.
713:(1984). "Problems in Public Perception of Nuclear Power: Fears and Risks Analyzed". In Behram KurĹźunoÄźlu; Arnold Perlmutter; Linda F. Scott (eds.). 392:
policies and guidelines, and as such hold little to no water at Knowledge (XXG), and are often ignored outright when determining consensus. But one
3499: 3469: 3259: 3239: 2796: 2465: 2420: 2415: 2224: 2108: 2012: 1749: 1461: 1406: 1361: 1299: 1269: 1174: 1164: 936: 3279: 2781: 1381: 1066: 289:
argument, if the editor accepts that half, and is being stupid if unaware that what they think, as an experienced editor, is somehow relevant for
3434: 3309: 3159: 2881: 2577: 2385: 2264: 2113: 1709: 1531: 1481: 1021: 269:. This is not an argument not to move this article there. Please address the arguments made in support, and explain why you disagree with them. 3449: 3389: 3314: 2806: 2776: 2696: 2525: 1496: 1486: 1451: 1264: 1169: 891: 3489: 329:
Many discussions on Knowledge (XXG) devolve into statements of opinion that the editor expects to be accepted as fact. This is an example of
3459: 3324: 3299: 3179: 2951: 2410: 2319: 2279: 2183: 1839: 1824: 1699: 1304: 1154: 1109: 1041: 1001: 851: 50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3601: 3429: 3409: 3334: 3329: 2901: 2390: 2033: 1942: 1804: 1739: 1649: 1639: 1614: 1576: 1571: 1506: 1274: 1234: 1179: 371:"They want you to use reason and logic it's time to start using our emotions and feelings, not reason and logic, in making our decisions." 51: 1887: 2505: 2168: 1997: 3623: 3026: 2314: 2299: 2214: 1789: 1134: 881: 876: 3419: 3229: 3199: 3164: 2991: 2470: 2380: 2294: 1937: 1907: 961: 218: 214: 1056: 769: 745: 721: 667: 643: 3585: 3454: 3284: 3011: 2911: 2721: 2597: 2510: 2475: 2400: 2370: 2234: 2068: 2058: 2007: 1834: 1819: 1744: 1516: 1366: 1209: 996: 941: 866: 796: 202: 2500: 2395: 2360: 1189: 3560: 3374: 3289: 3051: 2996: 2916: 2871: 2826: 2821: 2706: 2540: 2335: 2043: 1864: 1644: 1619: 1526: 1521: 1401: 1031: 946: 861: 737:
Eric S. Knowles and Jay A. Linn (2004). "The Importance of Resistance to Persuasion". In Eric S. Knowles and Jay A. Linn (ed.).
210: 3555: 2751: 2435: 3611: 3384: 3264: 3144: 3119: 2946: 2582: 2545: 2535: 2138: 2078: 1932: 1229: 1204: 1159: 1011: 986: 976: 951: 619: 3504: 3319: 3204: 3129: 3016: 2936: 2906: 2756: 2375: 2345: 2309: 2199: 2063: 1982: 1764: 1629: 1594: 1441: 1199: 1149: 1144: 871: 1927: 1114: 505: 3606: 3194: 3189: 3149: 3134: 3124: 3001: 2846: 2254: 2244: 2143: 1952: 1814: 1099: 971: 206: 3652: 3580: 3537: 3349: 3214: 3114: 3074: 3031: 2976: 2966: 2961: 2931: 2766: 2741: 2726: 2681: 2567: 2289: 2229: 1962: 1799: 1734: 1729: 1719: 1471: 1094: 846: 828: 789: 3254: 3209: 2572: 2445: 2405: 2209: 1947: 1476: 921: 249:
discussion about a specific article or a discussion about wording in a naming convention guideline. Non-constructive
3484: 3424: 3399: 3339: 3249: 3244: 2831: 2648: 2350: 2340: 2128: 2123: 1541: 1214: 1184: 1016: 198: 3444: 3394: 3174: 3169: 3139: 2628: 2592: 2587: 2284: 2088: 1922: 1446: 1279: 1254: 1129: 262: 543: 3439: 3006: 2861: 2274: 2269: 2053: 1972: 1829: 1491: 499: 233:. The principle here is that we do not organize Knowledge (XXG) along those lines. This is intended to be an 261:
already redirects here". Well, if that's not an error, that just shows that the topic of this article is the
896: 3379: 2841: 2638: 2562: 1426: 1371: 1356: 886: 127:
Expressing a like or dislike for the issue in question is not a helpful or useful argument in a discussion.
477:
too. While opinion forms a part of theatre criticism, it doesn't form a part of encyclopaedia writing. As
3479: 3089: 2658: 2633: 2612: 1992: 1624: 1416: 981: 478: 362:, talking about how to deal with irrational and subjective arguments, based upon "gut feelings", made in 159:
When faced with an incontrovertible fact use an emotional response to counter it. Expressions such as: "
55: 2653: 2643: 2557: 2530: 1794: 1046: 683: 65: 761:
Kalina Stefanova (2000). "Criticism should be ... But in reality ...: Theatre-makers have their say".
694: 245:"I like it" and "I don't like it" are arguments to avoid in discussions about article titles, be it a 221:
indeed recommends that we actively attempt to include points of view that counter our own prejudices.
363: 3109: 2073: 1912: 1809: 1006: 2249: 2239: 2148: 812: 308: 43: 526: 439:
that statement, without any rational foundation or reasoned underpinnings. An observation by Sir
2002: 766: 742: 718: 664: 640: 616: 539: 444: 163:" or "the deal just doesn't seem to appeal to me" often beat dozens of well-argued statements. 3274: 3219: 2365: 2304: 1604: 246: 177:
deal. It is an encyclopedia. Well-argued statements beat personal, subjective tastes.
3646: 3155:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
17: 58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 710: 457: 440: 376: 359: 234: 575:
This applies equally to synonyms such as "simply", as in "I simply don't like it".
133: 611:
Howard Lasnik (1975). "On the semantics of negation". In Donald Hockney (ed.).
547: 350: 330: 486:
and pronounce our personal opinions of the topics of encyclopaedia articles.
420:
Avoiding using the argument in reply to its use by others is but one part of
358:
The difficulty of addressing such arguments made by others is exemplified by
2356:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
596:
P. Kiparsky (1970). "Semantic Rules in Grammar". In H. Benedikktson (ed.).
148:, and their variants, are not arguments to use in talk page discussions. 428:
using "I just don't like it." and "I just like it.", and avoid doing so.
381:
Problems in Public Perception of Nuclear Power: Fears and Risks Analyzed
781: 465:
Eyre argues that a statement of like or dislike is not useful without
203:
introducing their own arguments, analyses, hypotheses, and conclusions
1760:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
613:
Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics
341:
statement which the speaker expects the listener to accept as valid.
307:
Workarounds may be found for experienced editors, such as creating a
3042:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
337:, a term which is used to identify and describe a sort of arbitrary 338: 132: 1225:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
566:
to persuasion, by rational arguments supported by cited sources.
562:("I won't do it") components. Knowledge (XXG) editors should be 3535: 3072: 2679: 1885: 826: 785: 229:"I like it" and "I don't like it" are also two of the several 113: 29: 2922:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2094:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1562:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
635:
Paul Steele and Tom Beasor (1999). "Practical Negotiation".
424:
avoiding using it oneself. One should recognize when one is
2451:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2260:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1855:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1195:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
907:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
417:
it correct to do so in response, here at Knowledge (XXG).
3295:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3305:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
101: 94: 87: 80: 73: 3663:
Knowledge (XXG) essays about building the encyclopedia
2857:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2491:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
542:, "I don't like it" is one of the three components of 496:
Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid on discussion pages
2603:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1240:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
3047:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
3594: 3548: 2621: 2328: 2192: 2026: 1898: 1658: 1585: 1080: 839: 3566:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays 3345:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them 967:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction 1537:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards 829:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content 253:arguments in requested move discussions include: 1690:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions 1635:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions 1387:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography 3365:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man 3095:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball 2772:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity 1412:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area 917:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia 449: 401:, not votes. Indeed, in many discussions here, 368: 157: 137:This expression suggests "I just don't like it" 2792:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage 1958:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors 1725:Counting and sorting are not original research 3619:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance 3235:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"! 1755:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability 1037:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy 797: 8: 3285:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake 2049:An uncivil environment is a poor environment 1775:How to save an article proposed for deletion 1052:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs 1027:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG) 992:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields 333:("He, himself, said it"), also known as the 2817:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability 695:"John Dewey and American Democracy," p. 359 435:an expression of like or dislike. They are 3545: 3532: 3510:You don't have to be mad to work here, but 3082: 3069: 2897:Notability is not relevance or reliability 2852:News coverage does not decrease notability 2762:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information 2712:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 2689: 2676: 1895: 1882: 1705:Before commenting in a deletion discussion 1680:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 836: 823: 804: 790: 782: 407:Polling is not a substitute for discussion 231:arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 3405:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you 1695:Arguments to make in deletion discussions 1315:Identifying and using independent sources 763:Who Keeps The Score on the London Stages? 3571:Don't cite essays as if they were policy 2732:Big events make key participants notable 2179:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly 1557:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source 1295:Formatting bilateral relations templates 52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 2982:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else 2887:Notability is not a level playing field 2802:How the presumption of notability works 1918:Contributing to complicated discussions 1770:How the presumption of notability works 1290:Formatting bilateral relations articles 1105:Adding images improves the encyclopedia 588: 517: 3515:You should not write meaningless lists 2812:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments 2119:Staying cool when the editing gets hot 1860:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork 1685:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews 1250:Don't hope the house will build itself 857:All Five Pillars are equally important 691:The Century dictionary and cyclopedia, 3658:Knowledge (XXG) essays about deletion 2942:One sentence does not an article make 2892:Notability is not a matter of opinion 2608:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip 2521:Don't throw your toys out of the pram 2039:A weak personal attack is still wrong 1978:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors 1610:Don't throw more litter onto the pile 1552:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress 1377:Minors and persons judged incompetent 1140:An unfinished house is a real problem 1125:Alternatives to the "Expand" template 927:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG) 741:. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 5. 705: 703: 219:Knowledge (XXG):Writing for the enemy 7: 3495:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes 3475:Things that should not be surprising 3170:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense 2496:Don't remind others of past misdeeds 2441:Don't come down like a ton of bricks 2426:Don't call people by their real name 2174:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning 2104:Profanity, civility, and discussions 1512:There are no shortcuts to neutrality 473:to "I just don't like it.", we must 3370:No one cares about your garage band 3355:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG) 3022:What is and is not routine coverage 2867:No one cares about your garage band 2787:Existence does not prove notability 2205:Assume the assumption of good faith 2134:There is no Divine Right of Editors 1988:Relationships with academic editors 1850:Why was the page I created deleted? 1845:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole 1285:Featured articles may have problems 1072:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki 615:. D. Reidel Publishing Co. p. 300. 3415:Please do not murder the newcomers 2972:Reducing consensus to an algorithm 2456:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid 1670:Adjectives in your recommendations 1547:What an article should not include 1437:The problem with elegant variation 1245:Don't get hung up on minor details 1062:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia 693:pp. 379-380; Westbrook, Robert B. 554:component. The other two are the 56:thoroughly vetted by the community 25: 3465:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG) 3037:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase 2737:Businesses with a single location 2018:You have a right to remain silent 1467:Restoring part of a reverted edit 1422:Potential, not just current state 1352:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats 682:Whitney, William Dwight. (1906). 2486:Don't knit beside the guillotine 2481:Don't ignore community consensus 1715:Confusing arguments mean nothing 717:. Taylor & Francis. p. 108. 639:. Gower Publishing, Ltd. p. 81. 403:it is not about the votes at all 117: 33: 27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 2987:Sources must be out-of-universe 2702:All high schools can be notable 2099:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values 1785:Identifying blatant advertising 1567:The world will not end tomorrow 1397:Not everything needs a template 1310:How to write a featured article 912:Editors will sometimes be wrong 475:subtract the subjective opinion 3576:Avoid writing redundant essays 3225:Don't stuff beans up your nose 3100:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 2927:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability 2877:Notability cannot be purchased 2837:Masking the lack of notability 1600:Copyediting reception sections 1502:Temporary versions of articles 1432:Principle of Some Astonishment 1220:Creating controversial content 1120:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 1067:Knowledge (XXG) is a community 316:Dispute resolution discussions 1: 3602:About policies and guidelines 2717:Articles with a single source 2341:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can 2164:Two wrongs don't make a right 2154:The rules of polite discourse 2084:It's not the end of the world 1392:Not everything needs a navbox 1260:Don't "teach the controversy" 932:Here to build an encyclopedia 364:the debate over nuclear power 3490:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG 3185:BOLD, revert, revert, revert 3105:Alternatives to edit warring 1968:Maintaining a friendly space 443:, discussing the subject of 168:Paul Steele and Tom Beasor, 3470:The Five Pillars of Untruth 3260:Editing under the influence 2797:Google searches and numbers 2516:Don't template the regulars 2431:Don't call the kettle black 2225:Be excellent to one another 2109:Revert notification opt-out 2013:We are all Wikipedians here 1462:Put a little effort into it 1407:Obtain peer review comments 1362:Introduction to structurism 1300:Fruit of the poisonous tree 1270:Editors are not mindreaders 1175:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle 1165:Beef up that first revision 937:Leave it to the experienced 902:Don't search for objections 558:("I don't believe it") and 484:not soapboxes to stand upon 345:Dealing with such arguments 3679: 3500:Why not create an account? 3435:Requirements for adminship 3310:How to vandalize correctly 3280:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG) 3240:Don't delete the main page 3160:Avoid using preview button 2882:Notability comparison test 2466:Don't fight fire with fire 2461:Don't eat the troll's food 2421:Don't call a spade a spade 2416:Don't bludgeon the process 2265:Encourage full discussions 2114:Shadowless Fists of Death! 1750:Don't attack the nominator 1710:But there must be sources! 1532:Try not to leave it a stub 1482:Source your plot summaries 506:Thought-terminating cliché 348: 280:User interface discussions 63: 3544: 3531: 3450:Sarcasm is really helpful 3390:Notability is not eternal 3315:How to win a citation war 3085: 3081: 3068: 2777:Every snowflake is unique 2697:Advanced source searching 2692: 2688: 2675: 2578:No, you can't have a pony 2526:Do not insult the vandals 2386:Don't be high-maintenance 1943:Encouraging the newcomers 1894: 1881: 1487:Specialized-style fallacy 1452:Pruning article revisions 1280:Endorsements (commercial) 1265:Editing on mobile devices 1170:Blind men and an elephant 1145:Articles have a half-life 892:Dissent is not disloyalty 862:Avoid vague introductions 835: 822: 739:Resistance and Persuasion 479:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page 3460:The Night Before Wikimas 3325:Ignore every single rule 3300:How to get away with UPE 3180:Before they were notable 2952:Overreliance upon Google 2747:Common sourcing mistakes 2320:Settle the process first 2280:Imagine others complexly 2184:Writing for the opponent 2159:There is no common sense 1840:Unopposed AFD discussion 1825:Relisting can be abusive 1700:Avoid repeated arguments 1305:Give an article a chance 1155:Avoid mission statements 1115:Advanced text formatting 1110:Advanced article editing 1057:Knowledge (XXG) in brief 1042:The rules are principles 1002:Product, process, policy 852:Articles must be written 560:motivational/behavioural 125:This page in a nutshell: 3595:Policies and guidelines 3430:Requests for medication 3410:Please bite the newbies 3335:Mess with the templates 2902:Notability means impact 2436:Don't call things cruft 2411:Don't be the Fun Police 2220:Avoid the word "vandal" 2169:Knowledge (XXG) clichés 2034:A thank you never hurts 1805:Liar liar pants on fire 1740:Deletion is not cleanup 1650:Writing better articles 1640:Write the article first 1615:Gender-neutral language 1587:Writing article content 1577:Writing better articles 1572:Write the article first 1507:Tertiary-source fallacy 1275:Encourage the newcomers 1235:Dictionaries as sources 1180:Build content to endure 659:Wouter H. Slob (2002). 413:ballots to be stuffed. 3653:Knowledge (XXG) essays 3624:Policy writing is hard 3330:Is that even an essay? 3027:What notability is not 2782:Existence ≠ Notability 2391:Don't be inconsiderate 2315:Read before commenting 2300:Mind your own business 2215:Avoid personal remarks 1790:Identifying test edits 1135:A navbox on every page 1090:100K featured articles 887:Concede lost arguments 882:Competence is required 813:Knowledge (XXG) essays 550:. It is the so-called 463: 385: 335:bare assertion fallacy 174: 138: 3420:Pledge of Tranquility 3165:Avoid using wikilinks 2992:Subjective importance 2506:Don't spite your face 2295:Keep it down to earth 2059:Beware of the tigers! 1998:Too long; didn't read 1938:Edit at your own pace 1908:Accepting other users 1675:AfD is not a war zone 1022:There is no seniority 962:Neutrality of sources 765:. Routledge. p. 100. 215:Neutral Point of View 136: 54:, as it has not been 18:Knowledge (XXG):IJDLI 3586:Quote your own essay 3455:Sausages for tasting 3230:Don't-give-a-fuckism 3200:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh? 3012:Vanispamcruftisement 2912:Notability sub-pages 2722:Avoid template creep 2682:Essays on notability 2598:There are no oracles 2381:Don't be a WikiBigot 2235:Call a spade a spade 2008:Unblock perspectives 1835:The Heymann Standard 1820:Overzealous deletion 1780:I just don't like it 1517:There is no deadline 1382:"Murder of" articles 1210:Common-style fallacy 1082:Article construction 997:Process is important 942:Levels of competence 867:Be a reliable source 663:. Springer. p. 127. 637:Business Negotiation 447:, illustrates this: 225:Deletion discussions 170:Business Negotiation 161:I just don't like it 153:Business Negotiation 142:I just don't like it 3375:No one really cares 3290:Go ahead, vandalize 3052:Two prongs of merit 2997:Third-party sources 2917:Notabilitymandering 2872:No one really cares 2827:Inherent notability 2822:Independent sources 2707:Alternative outlets 2541:Nationalist editing 2511:Don't take the bait 2476:Don't help too much 2401:Don't be prejudiced 2371:Don't be an ostrich 2336:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI 2069:Deletion as revenge 2044:Advice for hotheads 1865:No Encyclopedic Use 1745:Does deletion help? 1645:Writing about women 1527:The deadline is now 1522:There is a deadline 1402:Nothing is in stone 1032:Tendentious editing 947:Levels of consensus 661:Dialogical Rhetoric 498:(more specifically 297:experience levels. 182:Dialogical Rhetoric 180:Wouter H. Slob, in 3385:No sorcery threats 3265:Embrace Stop Signs 3145:Assume good wraith 3120:Anti-Wikipedianism 2957:Perennial websites 2947:Other stuff exists 2583:Passive aggression 2546:No angry mastodons 2536:Hate is disruptive 2396:Don't be obnoxious 2361:Don't be a fanatic 2139:Most ideas are bad 2079:Forgive and forget 1888:Essays on civility 1497:Run an edit-a-thon 1230:Deprecated sources 1205:Citation underkill 1190:Chesterton's fence 1160:Be neutral in form 1012:Reasonability rule 977:Oversimplification 952:Most ideas are bad 409:, remember. There 162: 139: 3640: 3639: 3636: 3635: 3632: 3631: 3527: 3526: 3523: 3522: 3505:Yes legal threats 3320:Ignore all essays 3205:Complete bollocks 3130:Asshole John rule 3064: 3063: 3060: 3059: 3017:What BLP1E is not 2937:One hundred words 2907:Notability points 2671: 2670: 2667: 2666: 2471:Don't give a fuck 2346:Civil POV pushing 2310:Mutual withdrawal 2200:Assume good faith 2064:Civility warnings 1983:Please say please 1933:Editors' pronouns 1877: 1876: 1873: 1872: 1765:Follow the leader 1630:Use our own words 1595:Avoid thread mode 1442:Pro and con lists 1200:Citation overkill 1150:Autosizing images 872:Civil POV pushing 540:social psychology 445:theatre criticism 241:Title discussions 160: 131: 130: 112: 111: 74:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT 16:(Redirected from 3670: 3581:Finding an essay 3546: 3533: 3195:Butterfly effect 3190:Boston Tea Party 3150:Assume stupidity 3135:Assume bad faith 3125:Articlecountitis 3083: 3070: 3002:Trivial mentions 2847:Minimum coverage 2690: 2677: 2376:Don't be ashamed 2255:Discussing cruft 2245:Deny recognition 2144:Nothing is clear 1953:Expect no thanks 1896: 1883: 1815:Nothing is clear 1662:deleting content 1345:Tertiary sources 1100:Acronym overkill 972:The one question 837: 824: 817: 806: 799: 792: 783: 776: 775: 758: 752: 751: 734: 728: 727: 707: 698: 680: 674: 673: 656: 650: 649: 632: 626: 625: 608: 602: 601: 593: 576: 573: 567: 536: 530: 522: 461: 383: 325:Because I say so 172: 121: 120: 114: 104: 97: 95:WP:IDONTLIKETHEM 90: 83: 76: 37: 36: 30: 21: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3628: 3590: 3561:Value of essays 3540: 3519: 3350:Legal vandalism 3215:Counting juntas 3115:Anti-Wikipedian 3077: 3075:Humorous essays 3056: 3032:What to include 2977:Run-of-the-mill 2967:Read the source 2932:Offline sources 2727:Bare notability 2684: 2663: 2617: 2568:No Confederates 2366:Don't be a jerk 2324: 2290:Keep it concise 2230:Beyond civility 2188: 2022: 1963:How to be civil 1928:Don't retaliate 1890: 1869: 1800:Keep it concise 1735:Delete the junk 1730:Delete or merge 1720:Content removal 1654: 1620:Myth vs fiction 1581: 1472:Robotic editing 1335:Science sources 1330:Primary sources 1320:History sources 1095:Abandoned stubs 1076: 847:Article content 831: 818: 810: 780: 779: 772: 760: 759: 755: 748: 736: 735: 731: 724: 709: 708: 701: 681: 677: 670: 658: 657: 653: 646: 634: 633: 629: 622: 610: 609: 605: 595: 594: 590: 585: 580: 579: 574: 570: 537: 533: 523: 519: 514: 492: 462: 456: 384: 375: 353: 347: 327: 318: 282: 263:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 243: 227: 195: 193:Article content 190: 173: 167: 151:In their book, 144:, its inverse, 118: 108: 107: 100: 93: 86: 79: 72: 68: 60: 59: 34: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3676: 3674: 3666: 3665: 3660: 3655: 3645: 3644: 3638: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3629: 3627: 3626: 3621: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3609: 3598: 3596: 3592: 3591: 3589: 3588: 3583: 3578: 3573: 3568: 3563: 3558: 3552: 3550: 3542: 3541: 3536: 3529: 3528: 3525: 3524: 3521: 3520: 3518: 3517: 3512: 3507: 3502: 3497: 3492: 3487: 3482: 3477: 3472: 3467: 3462: 3457: 3452: 3447: 3442: 3437: 3432: 3427: 3422: 3417: 3412: 3407: 3402: 3397: 3392: 3387: 3382: 3377: 3372: 3367: 3362: 3357: 3352: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3332: 3327: 3322: 3317: 3312: 3307: 3302: 3297: 3292: 3287: 3282: 3277: 3272: 3267: 3262: 3257: 3255:Editsummarisis 3252: 3247: 3242: 3237: 3232: 3227: 3222: 3217: 3212: 3210:Counting forks 3207: 3202: 3197: 3192: 3187: 3182: 3177: 3172: 3167: 3162: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3127: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3102: 3097: 3092: 3086: 3079: 3078: 3073: 3066: 3065: 3062: 3061: 3058: 3057: 3055: 3054: 3049: 3044: 3039: 3034: 3029: 3024: 3019: 3014: 3009: 3004: 2999: 2994: 2989: 2984: 2979: 2974: 2969: 2964: 2959: 2954: 2949: 2944: 2939: 2934: 2929: 2924: 2919: 2914: 2909: 2904: 2899: 2894: 2889: 2884: 2879: 2874: 2869: 2864: 2859: 2854: 2849: 2844: 2839: 2834: 2829: 2824: 2819: 2814: 2809: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2779: 2774: 2769: 2767:Don't cite GNG 2764: 2759: 2754: 2749: 2744: 2742:But it's true! 2739: 2734: 2729: 2724: 2719: 2714: 2709: 2704: 2699: 2693: 2686: 2685: 2680: 2673: 2672: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2664: 2662: 2661: 2656: 2651: 2646: 2641: 2639:WikiHarassment 2636: 2631: 2625: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2616: 2615: 2610: 2605: 2600: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2575: 2573:No queerphobia 2570: 2565: 2560: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2543: 2538: 2533: 2528: 2523: 2518: 2513: 2508: 2503: 2498: 2493: 2488: 2483: 2478: 2473: 2468: 2463: 2458: 2453: 2448: 2443: 2438: 2433: 2428: 2423: 2418: 2413: 2408: 2403: 2398: 2393: 2388: 2383: 2378: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2358: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2338: 2332: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2322: 2317: 2312: 2307: 2302: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2262: 2257: 2252: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2210:Assume no clue 2207: 2202: 2196: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2161: 2156: 2151: 2146: 2141: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2091: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2071: 2066: 2061: 2056: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2030: 2028: 2024: 2023: 2021: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1948:Enjoy yourself 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1904: 1902: 1892: 1891: 1886: 1879: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1871: 1870: 1868: 1867: 1862: 1857: 1852: 1847: 1842: 1837: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1591: 1589: 1583: 1582: 1580: 1579: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1559: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1539: 1534: 1529: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1479: 1477:Sham consensus 1474: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1379: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1086: 1084: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 979: 974: 969: 964: 959: 954: 949: 944: 939: 934: 929: 924: 922:Explanationism 919: 914: 909: 904: 899: 894: 889: 884: 879: 874: 869: 864: 859: 854: 849: 843: 841: 833: 832: 827: 820: 819: 811: 809: 808: 801: 794: 786: 778: 777: 770: 753: 746: 729: 722: 699: 675: 668: 651: 644: 627: 620: 603: 587: 586: 584: 581: 578: 577: 568: 565: 561: 557: 553: 531: 516: 515: 513: 510: 509: 508: 503: 500:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 491: 488: 476: 472: 468: 454: 438: 434: 427: 423: 412: 404: 400: 395: 390: 373: 346: 343: 326: 323: 317: 314: 313: 312: 305: 296: 292: 281: 278: 277: 276: 273: 270: 247:Requested Move 242: 239: 226: 223: 194: 191: 189: 186: 165: 146:I just like it 129: 128: 122: 110: 109: 106: 105: 98: 91: 84: 77: 69: 64: 61: 49: 48: 40: 38: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3675: 3664: 3661: 3659: 3656: 3654: 3651: 3650: 3648: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3617: 3613: 3610: 3608: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3600: 3599: 3597: 3593: 3587: 3584: 3582: 3579: 3577: 3574: 3572: 3569: 3567: 3564: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3554: 3553: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3534: 3530: 3516: 3513: 3511: 3508: 3506: 3503: 3501: 3498: 3496: 3493: 3491: 3488: 3486: 3485:Watchlistitis 3483: 3481: 3480:The WikiBible 3478: 3476: 3473: 3471: 3468: 3466: 3463: 3461: 3458: 3456: 3453: 3451: 3448: 3446: 3443: 3441: 3438: 3436: 3433: 3431: 3428: 3426: 3425:R-e-s-p-e-c-t 3423: 3421: 3418: 3416: 3413: 3411: 3408: 3406: 3403: 3401: 3400:Play the game 3398: 3396: 3393: 3391: 3388: 3386: 3383: 3381: 3378: 3376: 3373: 3371: 3368: 3366: 3363: 3361: 3358: 3356: 3353: 3351: 3348: 3346: 3343: 3341: 3340:My local pond 3338: 3336: 3333: 3331: 3328: 3326: 3323: 3321: 3318: 3316: 3313: 3311: 3308: 3306: 3303: 3301: 3298: 3296: 3293: 3291: 3288: 3286: 3283: 3281: 3278: 3276: 3273: 3271: 3268: 3266: 3263: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3251: 3250:Edits Per Day 3248: 3246: 3245:Editcountitis 3243: 3241: 3238: 3236: 3233: 3231: 3228: 3226: 3223: 3221: 3218: 3216: 3213: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3203: 3201: 3198: 3196: 3193: 3191: 3188: 3186: 3183: 3181: 3178: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3163: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3113: 3111: 3108: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3071: 3067: 3053: 3050: 3048: 3045: 3043: 3040: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3030: 3028: 3025: 3023: 3020: 3018: 3015: 3013: 3010: 3008: 3005: 3003: 3000: 2998: 2995: 2993: 2990: 2988: 2985: 2983: 2980: 2978: 2975: 2973: 2970: 2968: 2965: 2963: 2960: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2950: 2948: 2945: 2943: 2940: 2938: 2935: 2933: 2930: 2928: 2925: 2923: 2920: 2918: 2915: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2905: 2903: 2900: 2898: 2895: 2893: 2890: 2888: 2885: 2883: 2880: 2878: 2875: 2873: 2870: 2868: 2865: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2855: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2843: 2840: 2838: 2835: 2833: 2832:Insignificant 2830: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2778: 2775: 2773: 2770: 2768: 2765: 2763: 2760: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2748: 2745: 2743: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2730: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2720: 2718: 2715: 2713: 2710: 2708: 2705: 2703: 2700: 2698: 2695: 2694: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2678: 2674: 2660: 2657: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2649:WikiLawyering 2647: 2645: 2642: 2640: 2637: 2635: 2632: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2624: 2622:WikiRelations 2620: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2556: 2552: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2539: 2537: 2534: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2507: 2504: 2502: 2499: 2497: 2494: 2492: 2489: 2487: 2484: 2482: 2479: 2477: 2474: 2472: 2469: 2467: 2464: 2462: 2459: 2457: 2454: 2452: 2449: 2447: 2446:Don't cry COI 2444: 2442: 2439: 2437: 2434: 2432: 2429: 2427: 2424: 2422: 2419: 2417: 2414: 2412: 2409: 2407: 2406:Don't be rude 2404: 2402: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2374: 2372: 2369: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2351:Cyberbullying 2349: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2331: 2327: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2313: 2311: 2308: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2263: 2261: 2258: 2256: 2253: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2243: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2218: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2197: 2195: 2191: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2147: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2137: 2135: 2132: 2130: 2129:The last word 2127: 2125: 2124:The grey zone 2122: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2082: 2080: 2077: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2029: 2025: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1903: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1880: 1866: 1863: 1861: 1858: 1856: 1853: 1851: 1848: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1833: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1657: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1621: 1618: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1590: 1588: 1584: 1578: 1575: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1558: 1555: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1542:Walled garden 1540: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1495: 1493: 1490: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1428: 1425: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1375: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1367:Mine a source 1365: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1228: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1215:Concept cloud 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1185:Cherrypicking 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1017:Systemic bias 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 958: 955: 953: 950: 948: 945: 943: 940: 938: 935: 933: 930: 928: 925: 923: 920: 918: 915: 913: 910: 908: 905: 903: 900: 898: 895: 893: 890: 888: 885: 883: 880: 878: 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 844: 842: 838: 834: 830: 825: 821: 814: 807: 802: 800: 795: 793: 788: 787: 784: 773: 771:9789057551161 768: 764: 757: 754: 749: 747:9780805844863 744: 740: 733: 730: 725: 723:9783718602247 720: 716: 712: 706: 704: 700: 696: 692: 689: 687: 679: 676: 671: 669:9781402009099 666: 662: 655: 652: 647: 645:9780566080722 642: 638: 631: 628: 623: 618: 614: 607: 604: 599: 592: 589: 582: 572: 569: 563: 559: 555: 551: 549: 545: 541: 535: 532: 528: 521: 518: 511: 507: 504: 501: 497: 494: 493: 489: 487: 485: 480: 474: 470: 466: 459: 453: 448: 446: 442: 436: 432: 429: 425: 421: 418: 414: 410: 408: 402: 398: 393: 388: 382: 378: 372: 367: 365: 361: 356: 352: 344: 342: 340: 336: 332: 324: 322: 315: 310: 306: 303: 302: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 279: 274: 271: 268: 267:ProposedTitle 264: 260: 259:ProposedTitle 256: 255: 254: 252: 248: 240: 238: 236: 232: 224: 222: 220: 216: 213:sources. The 212: 208: 204: 200: 192: 188:Applicability 187: 185: 183: 178: 171: 164: 156: 154: 149: 147: 143: 135: 126: 123: 116: 115: 103: 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 75: 71: 70: 67: 62: 57: 53: 47: 45: 39: 32: 31: 19: 3549:About essays 3538:About essays 3445:Rouge editor 3395:Oops Defense 3175:Barnstaritis 3140:Assume faith 2962:Pokémon test 2807:High Schools 2629:WikiBullying 2593:Superhatting 2588:POV railroad 2285:Just drop it 2089:Nobody cares 1923:Divisiveness 1779: 1447:Printability 1340:Style guides 1130:Amnesia test 987:Paraphrasing 762: 756: 738: 732: 714: 711:Dixy Lee Ray 690: 685: 678: 660: 654: 636: 630: 612: 606: 600:. Reikyavik. 597: 591: 571: 534: 520: 464: 458:Richard Eyre 450: 441:Richard Eyre 430: 419: 415: 386: 380: 377:Dixy Lee Ray 369: 360:Dixy Lee Ray 357: 354: 334: 328: 319: 299: 287: 283: 266: 258: 250: 244: 235:encyclopedia 228: 196: 181: 179: 175: 169: 158: 152: 150: 145: 141: 140: 124: 41: 3556:Essay guide 3440:Rouge admin 3007:Video links 2862:No big loss 2551:just madmen 2501:Don't shout 2275:How to lose 2270:Get over it 2054:Be the glue 1973:Negotiation 1830:Relist bias 1660:Removing or 1492:Stub Makers 1325:Law sources 1255:Don't panic 527:Not Hopping 471:add reasons 467:reasons for 293:editors of 211:independent 42:This is an 3647:Categories 3612:Guidelines 3380:No, really 3360:LTTAUTMAOK 2842:Make stubs 2563:No racists 2305:Say "MOBY" 2027:Philosophy 1900:The basics 1457:Publicists 1427:Presentism 1372:Merge Test 1357:Inaccuracy 840:Philosophy 686:Ipse dixit 621:9027705127 583:References 548:persuasion 544:resistance 399:discussion 387:One thing 351:Truthiness 349:See also: 331:ipse dixit 3090:Adminitis 2659:WikiPeace 2634:WikiCrime 2613:UPPERCASE 1993:Thank you 1625:Proseline 1417:Permastub 982:Paradoxes 897:Don't lie 556:cognitive 552:affective 201:—without 66:Shortcuts 3607:Policies 2757:Coatrack 2654:WikiLove 2644:WikiHate 2558:No Nazis 2531:Griefing 1795:Immunity 1047:Trifecta 877:Cohesion 490:See also 422:entirely 394:must not 339:dogmatic 207:reliable 199:verified 3270:Emerson 3110:ANI flu 2074:Failure 1913:Apology 1810:Nothing 1007:Purpose 426:oneself 102:WP:JUST 88:WP:JDLI 2752:Clones 2329:Don'ts 2250:Desist 2240:Candor 2149:Reader 437:solely 411:are no 309:gadget 251:oppose 205:—from 81:WP:JDL 2003:Truce 512:Notes 44:essay 3275:Fart 3220:Crap 1605:Coup 957:Need 767:ISBN 743:ISBN 719:ISBN 665:ISBN 641:ISBN 617:ISBN 564:open 433:just 265:for 209:and 2193:Dos 816:(?) 546:to 538:In 389:not 295:all 291:all 3649:: 702:^ 688:," 460:, 455:— 405:. 379:, 374:— 366:: 166:— 805:e 798:t 791:v 774:. 750:. 726:. 697:. 684:" 672:. 648:. 624:. 529:. 502:) 257:" 46:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):IJDLI
essay
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
WP:JDL
WP:JDLI
WP:IDONTLIKETHEM
WP:JUST

verified
introducing their own arguments, analyses, hypotheses, and conclusions
reliable
independent
Neutral Point of View
Knowledge (XXG):Writing for the enemy
arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
encyclopedia
Requested Move
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
gadget
ipse dixit
dogmatic
Truthiness
Dixy Lee Ray
the debate over nuclear power
Dixy Lee Ray
Polling is not a substitute for discussion
Richard Eyre

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑