99:. While it would be perfectly acceptable to have a user subpage of disputes appropriately titled, calling it a "trollbox... dedicated to trolling messages" the editor has received is simply disparaging those he has come in conflict with, particularly when you consider that the "trolling" is really nothing of the sort. It includes an exchange where he and another party toss
497:
LMAO, good faith is assumed upon meeting someone. After a while there's a pattern of annoyance, and trolling! Anyway, you've fantastically described the page, a trophy of the worst comments I've received. I've archived the trash that these messages are anyway. Feel free to apply
Comunism if you wish,
554:
Well credits to you for at least being aggreable to read. It's like this, I've said above the people who've made it to the trollbox (it's a bit like a collection of the worst) are clearly not held in my heart, I don't feel like being compassionate about them, more still, I'd like them to see it as a
378:
as suggested. Captain scarlet is perfectly entitled to keep an archive of disputes, and probably the easiest way to deal with its unfortunate name is to ignore it, but it is completely against policy. This user has been advised that a trollbox is not a good idea on several occasions, going back to
320:
The way things are going, I guess I ought to make a backup of all this... Regardless of your guys' right to do any this I'll have to store it someone under an appropiate name. I don't know why I waste my time with you... Comments after comments it's inuendos, double entende and vaguely insulting Ă
166:
consider trolling and for me alone. you guys not believing it is trolling doesn't mean I don't believe it is, these were comments left to my attention which I consider trolling as none of these comments were welcome or appreciated. whatever my history, any comment I consider trolling goes there. I
446:
per nom. This page serves no useful purpose other than to attempt to disparage other users. Captain scarlet has asked that I do not leave messages on his talk page but I feel it is perfectly acceptable to ignore this request where I feel it is necessary to communicate with him. The recent case of
218:
Actions inconsistent with good faith include repeated vandalism, confirmed malicious sockpuppetry, and lying. Assuming good faith also does not mean that no action by editors should be criticized, but instead that criticism should not be attributed to malice unless there is specific evidence of
516:
Why thank you - I always knew I was masterful with the word. ;) Well my friend, it sounds like you have a case of the tough bikkies - We all meet pains in the vases here & there (me being one included!), but we have to deal with it. We all make mistakes & I'm sure your page's subject's
283:
I'm entitled to think what I wish about both a contributor or his/hers contributions. I've specifically asked, in many occurances, that certain editors do not contact me on my talk page. I'm not vandalising, personally attacking any user here, I'm saying their comments are unwelcome; trolling.
415:
I don't think it is necessary to remerge anything... the sockpuppetry case for example was on
Captain scarlet's main talkpage before he deleted it and moved it here. He is under no obligation to keep it listed on the talkpage. If he wants it deleted that is his
278:
You've forgotten the last part of the sentence. Firstly you ommited to mention this in the first palce, then ommitted part of it. You can't turn things your way. Not assuming bad faith is valid before meeting someone. After weeks, months of
451:. If Captain scarlet wishes to retain the messages they should be archived like other messages. In summary, I cannot understand in what way this page furthers the aims of the Knowledge (XXG) project and so do not believe it should remain.
596:
Careful of the slippery slope
Pigsonthewing. You can wait the two more days there is to conclude this farce Pigsonthewing. It's the 15th today, not the 17th. Anyway, all your blabber's been archived, it's all safe don't worry.
447:
sockpuppetry was one such occasion but this is being described by
Captain scarlet as trolling despite the instruction to "Notify the suspected puppetmaster" in the "Reporting suspected sock puppets" section of
75:
383:. Labelling messages "trolling" is not helpful even when they are trolling. In this case, where it is hard to see how many of the comments could be considered trolling, it is unacceptable.
193:. You may find it patronizing and inappropriate, but the fact stands, this page exists to disparage those who you've come in conflict with an this is in no way helpful to the project.--
402:
and re-merge stuff such as the sockpuppetry case to the main talk page. Note I am NOT advocating a simple delete. I am asking the closing admin to do a little extra work on this one.
680:. After scanning his trollbox, on which I see , surprisingly, my own name appear, given that I was merely disagreeing with him, I feel this page should also be deleted.
498:
the messages are safe to show to people what contributors get away with and get others punished for. One day too I'll insult someone and have my target banned.
517:
wouldn't want theirs plastered on an article somewhere to remind them. Have some compassion for your fellow man & let go. Hope you have a great day! :)
622:
210:
Who said anything about owning anything? The page isn't there to help or not to help anyone, it's a categorisation of comments I consider trolling.
162:(oh and guess: keep) No request for name change have been filed upon my talkpage and if it were I probably would leave it as is. That page is what
122:
95:) change the name of this subpage. As it is still here at this namespace I assume he has declined to do so. This is pretty clearly against
92:
219:
malice. Editors should not accuse the other side in a conflict of not assuming good faith in the absence of reasonable supporting evidence.
17:
693:
653:
629:
608:
587:
569:
543:
521:
509:
488:
480:- Keeping a trophy cabinet of all the people who have annoyed you is not assuming good faith & quite frankly, is something that the
470:
455:
436:
420:
406:
392:
370:
352:
295:
257:
232:
197:
178:
148:
133:
57:
251:
Editors should not accuse the other side in a conflict of not assuming good faith in the absence of reasonable supporting evidence.
249:...and what you are doing by characterizing those comment as "trolling" is covered by the text you've quoted above; specifically:
639:
321:
propos. God I think it's trolling, it should be enough for any of you, off course it isn't, someone needs to voice their PoV.
167:
find it patronising and inappropriate for anyone else than myself find it appropriate to judge what I consider trolling.
64:
708:
36:
648:
603:
564:
504:
290:
227:
173:
116:
86:
707:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
677:
618:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below.
643:
598:
559:
499:
285:
222:
168:
112:
82:
688:
189:
Nothing in your userspace, or anywhere else here on
Knowledge (XXG) is for you alone... please see
125:) being blocked); and several content disputes. This subpage in no way furthers the encyclopedia.
452:
584:
540:
467:
367:
349:
108:
673:
96:
481:
676:
also has a sub-page named "Trollbox" as well, and has been active on many similar pages to
448:
190:
104:
100:
71:
681:
518:
485:
417:
254:
194:
130:
626:
433:
403:
388:
253:
Calling these comments trolling assumes bad faith on the part of the other editor.--
51:
145:
638:
I'm sorry
Nardman1 but it seems your contribution could be assimilated to a
384:
701:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
342:
No request for name change have been filed upon my talkpage
111:
at each other; a sockpuppet investigation (which ended in
556:
535:
463:
380:
345:
79:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
144:per concerns relating to not assuming good faith.
711:). No further edits should be made to this page.
221:Well I consider all those comments as trolling.
555:sign that they've gone over the top. Just like
8:
621:is a farce, eh? I wonder what the consensus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
7:
558:Pigsonthewing who'se just made it.
65:User talk:Captain scarlet/Trollbox
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
728:
694:23:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
654:23:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
630:22:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
609:22:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
588:17:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
570:15:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
544:15:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
522:11:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
510:11:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
489:11:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
471:17:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
456:13:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
437:12:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
421:01:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
407:23:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
393:16:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
371:16:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
353:16:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
296:15:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
258:15:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
233:14:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
198:14:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
179:14:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
149:13:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
134:13:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
58:19:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
704:Please do not modify it.
464:still adding to the page
32:Please do not modify it.
678:User:Captain Scarlet
539:adding to the page.
78:and as a result, I
70:This showed up on
674:User:lewisskinner
650:and the Mysterons
605:and the Mysterons
566:and the Mysterons
506:and the Mysterons
462:Comment: User is
292:and the Mysterons
229:and the Mysterons
175:and the Mysterons
719:
706:
691:
686:
685:
346:Oh yes there has
213:(edit conflict)
54:
50:
34:
727:
726:
722:
721:
720:
718:
717:
716:
715:
709:deletion review
702:
689:
683:
682:
645:Captain Scarlet
600:Captain Scarlet
583:Time to close?
561:Captain Scarlet
501:Captain Scarlet
287:Captain Scarlet
224:Captain Scarlet
170:Captain Scarlet
113:Captain scarlet
83:Captain scarlet
68:
52:
48:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
725:
723:
714:
713:
697:
696:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
633:
632:
612:
611:
591:
590:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
547:
546:
527:
526:
525:
524:
513:
512:
492:
491:
474:
473:
459:
458:
440:
439:
426:
425:
424:
423:
410:
409:
396:
395:
373:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
211:
203:
202:
201:
200:
184:
183:
182:
181:
154:
153:
152:
151:
67:
62:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
724:
712:
710:
705:
699:
698:
695:
692:
687:
679:
675:
672:
668:
667:Strong Delete
665:
664:
655:
652:
651:
647:
646:
641:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
628:
624:
620:
616:
615:
614:
613:
610:
607:
606:
602:
601:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
586:
582:
579:
578:
571:
568:
567:
563:
562:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
542:
538:
537:
532:
529:
528:
523:
520:
515:
514:
511:
508:
507:
503:
502:
496:
495:
494:
493:
490:
487:
483:
479:
476:
475:
472:
469:
465:
461:
460:
457:
454:
450:
445:
442:
441:
438:
435:
431:
430:Strong Delete
428:
427:
422:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
405:
401:
398:
397:
394:
390:
386:
382:
377:
374:
372:
369:
365:
362:
361:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
297:
294:
293:
289:
288:
282:
281:collaboration
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
259:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
234:
231:
230:
226:
225:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
199:
196:
192:
188:
187:
186:
185:
180:
177:
176:
172:
171:
165:
161:
158:
157:
156:
155:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
124:
121:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
91:
88:
84:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
61:
59:
56:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
703:
700:
670:
666:
649:
644:
619:WP:Consensus
604:
599:
585:Andy Mabbett
580:
565:
560:
541:Andy Mabbett
534:
530:
505:
500:
484:would do...
477:
468:Andy Mabbett
443:
429:
399:
375:
368:Andy Mabbett
363:
350:Andy Mabbett
341:
291:
286:
280:
250:
228:
223:
217:
214:
174:
169:
163:
159:
141:
126:
119:
89:
76:few days ago
69:
45:
43:
31:
28:
432:: Per nom.
684:DDStretch
617:You think
533:: User is
625:will be.
519:Spawn Man
486:Spawn Man
418:Isotope23
255:Isotope23
195:Isotope23
131:Isotope23
80:requested
627:Nardman1
482:Predator
434:Jhamez84
404:Nardman1
123:contribs
109:WP:CIVIL
93:contribs
671:Comment
581:Comment
531:Comment
453:Adambro
416:call.--
160:Comment
97:WP:USER
690:(talk)
640:threat
478:Delete
449:WP:SSP
444:Delete
400:Delete
376:Rename
364:Delete
191:WP:OWN
146:Addhoc
142:Delete
127:Delete
107:, and
105:WP:AGF
101:WP:NPA
72:WP:ANI
46:Delete
536:still
215:Bonus
53:demon
16:<
669:and
623:here
389:talk
381:June
129:. --
117:talk
87:talk
385:JPD
642:.
466:.
391:)
366:.
348:.
344:"
103:,
74:a
387:(
340:"
164:I
120:·
115:(
90:·
85:(
49:^
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.