211:
The only other things on the user's talk page are notifications of the AfD and MfD discussions and a note by
Mangojuice about OR. The user has not responded to notifications about the AfD and MfD discussions, suggesting they're probably not coming back to Knowledge, and Mangojuice's comment can be
228:
Why isn't blanking sufficient? The essay was obviously cut and pasted from some other document, since it showed up in whole cloth in the first edit, so the user clearly isn't storing it here, even in the page history. So this isn't a
109:
and instruct the user on proper use of user space. I would have suggested simply blanking if it weren't for the outstanding AFDs on similar things he has posted in the mainspace.
184:
Essay = bad. But this is a user talk page and has other stuff on it. I blanked the essay. The page is now no longer objectionable, and serves another legitimate purpose. The
76:
17:
237:
192:
167:
143:
263:
244:
221:
199:
176:
147:
126:
100:
59:
72:
278:
36:
212:
easily cut and pasted. I would like to see this deleted to purge the page history and leave no trace of his OR.
260:
277:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
79:. Seems to be using account only to publish original research and is now doing so in his userspace. Fails
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
159:
257:
217:
121:
96:
65:
135:
139:
71:
Essay on user's talk page. User has two such essays in article space up for deletion at AfD
234:
189:
213:
118:
92:
80:
230:
114:
110:
88:
54:
84:
49:
271:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:). No further edits should be made to this page.
188:page on the other hand has no other purpose.
8:
256:with the essay blanked per Mangojuice. --
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
44:The result of the debate was
1:
60:03:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
264:05:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
245:02:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
222:08:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
200:04:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
177:02:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
148:00:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
127:11:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
101:10:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
48:and restored without essay
298:
274:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
66:User talk:Abdulruff
289:
276:
242:
197:
175:
170:
162:
124:
34:
297:
296:
292:
291:
290:
288:
287:
286:
285:
279:deletion review
272:
238:
193:
173:
168:
160:
156:
122:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
295:
293:
284:
283:
267:
266:
258:Metropolitan90
250:
249:
248:
247:
231:WP:NOT#WEBHOST
225:
224:
203:
202:
179:
165:
150:
129:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
294:
282:
280:
275:
269:
268:
265:
262:
259:
255:
252:
251:
246:
243:
241:
236:
232:
227:
226:
223:
219:
215:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
198:
196:
191:
187:
183:
180:
178:
174:
171:
164:
163:
154:
151:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
130:
128:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
104:
103:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
273:
270:
253:
239:
208:
194:
185:
182:Strong keep.
181:
158:
157:
152:
131:
106:
70:
55:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
161:Compwhiz II
111:WP:NOT#SOAP
155:per above
134:as above.
214:Redfarmer
115:WP:NOT#OR
93:Redfarmer
89:WP:NOT#OR
233:issue.
209:Comment:
169:Contribs
81:WP:SOAP
56:toronto
46:deleted
261:(talk)
153:Delete
136:Shalom
132:Delete
107:Delete
240:juice
235:Mango
195:juice
190:Mango
144:Peace
140:Hello
123:desat
85:WP:OR
51:nat.u
16:<
254:Keep
218:talk
186:user
119:Core
117:. --
97:talk
77:here
75:and
73:here
220:)
146:)
142:•
113:,
99:)
91:.
87:,
83:,
216:(
172:)
166:(
138:(
95:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.