Knowledge:Move review/Log/2016 December

726:

unbecoming, but the issue is no longer "ripe", especially given how long this MR has been going on. But then you had the additional gall to a) promise Nyttend to come back him up (WTF does that have to do with WP consensus processes, based on an analysis of source and policy arguments? Nothing; it's you forming a tagteam), and then b) deliver in spades, by whipping up a bloc vote of people everyone knows are going to be very close to 100% in favor of going by the titlecard in the movie regardless of all other sources, P&G, and other considerations. And you call it neutral? Let's actually look at it. There is nothing even faintly neutral about this:

1013:

don't know. It is a name of a film, and not a film which is made by a real person named Steamboat Bill or Steamboat Bill Jr., so the Hank Williams Jr. example has nothing to do with this. As I said on another page, the comma thing was over as far as I was concerned, but at that point I don't think anyone expected an escalation to fictional film titles. A bridge too far for many editors, so my objecting that this wasn't a non-controversial move turned out to be correct. So please let's not get too personal this time.

1055:. The short version is that even the film's own marketing materials do not consistently include the comma. The argument that the comma is "officially" part of the title is simply false. It's included sometimes, dropped other times, both by RS and by the very producers/distributors of the work. The general MOS (and COMMONNAME) point, about all stylistic variations, is: Do what the guidelines say, not what the marketing of the subject does, unless RS 1501:

about the matter, which has seemingly gone from irked to enraged, enough to make blanket threats against anyone using normal processes, threats that wouldn't be appropriate no matter what the topic was or who was making it. I'm not sure I've ever seen a more obvious case of INVOLVED in an admin close at RM before, frankly. What could possibly go beyond that sufficiency of substantiation? Did he need to write a "Down with MOS:JR" editorial in the

792:

as if your opinions are necessarily and unequivocally fact, and denigrated calm and logical posts as "wikilawyering." Despite your insistence otherwise, the length and vociferousness of your post suggest you do indeed seem to very much give a you-know-what — and I still have enormous difficulty understanding why anyone, knowing a film's inarguable actual title, onscreen and as copyrighted, and still wanting to falsify it because of a guideline for

1406:, however supporters observed that JR is a guideline applicable to biographies and that its application to the titles of works of fiction is at best inconsistent, thus our article title ought to reflect the work's legally registered name and common use in reliable sources. While Nyttend's closing statement may have been unduly harsh, that is not a reason to overturn a close that was well within admin discretion. 1193:, which was well within admin discretion. The insinuation that it must be a supervote because Nyttend is "not even a normal closer" (when he was merely responding to an AN request) is, at the very least, not proven. If I had been the one to respond to the AN request, I would have closed the discussion the same way (though almost certainly without the final sentence of the closing statement). 1566:"sanctions") if the person's demands are not met. What exactly is it that you "do not see"? It is more visible now? Is it perhaps clearer now that various other parties who were not in the RM and who even agree with the first part of the close also find that the threat was inappropriate and some want it struck or moved into the body of the RM as a comment and not part of the close? 905:; it's pretty clear he was applying his anti-MOS bias in this close. He's not even a normal closer, and as the discussion page history shows, he didn't even know how to close it correctly, and just hatted the discussion instead. This is not the behavior of an admin trying to help by neutrally doing what he knows how to do, but rather the behavior of an involved admin pulling a 1730:- If "relist" means start over with a new RM, I don't see any benefit to that, as any problems with quality of arguments would simply occur again in the new RM. I do feel that anyone with strong feelings on the topic should have the sense to let someone else handle it. And the close statement should reflect the closer's disinterested detachment from the question at hand. ― 1817:("t should be clear that the proper title has a comma.") Boldface emphasis added: "I saw your comment endorsing the close of the move request, and I thought you'd want to know that a couple of editors who did not get the result they wanted started an appeal. You may wish to place your comment at the bottom of Knowledge:Move_review#Steamboat Bill, Jr. with your choice 670:, whose proposal was not supported, are the only ones calling my neutral notice canvassing. That obviously makes the claim suspect when everyone else here agrees it is not canvassing. I posted the notice word-for-word above at 6:55, 30 December 2016 asked if there were anything not strictly factual. I even boldfaced here the words "either to endorse the admin's close 1544:(at least 11 to 5) supporting the comma, and those !votes were based on clear rationales for film articles. The close also noted why the omission of commas on biography articles did not apply there. Persons who opposed the clear consensus seem to be equating the wording or perceived tone of the close with threats or with being involved, which I myself do not see. 716:, a barely distinguishable case of inviting with "neutral" wording a non-neutral editorial pool to come vote stack. And his post's wording actually was fairly neutral; your was anything but. I don't see many people there saying it wasn't canvassing, and I think the same would be the view with regard to your "neutral" notice. Frankly, I 686:. Why? Because a film title is not a biography. Nor is the name of a magazine, or of a plant, or of a couch or of a planet. None of those things are biographies. A biography is a nonfiction account of a person's life. Is a film title that, or a plant name or those other things? No. Acting as if one doesn't know the difference between a 2519:(Disclosure: I requested the move in the first place.) I might be misunderstanding the process here. At the time of closing there was no opposition to the requested move. To the point, actually, where I as the requester of the move was gently told that I should have done it myself, without opening a discussion. Closer 2410: 1293:- This is where it comes to? *sigh* After soul-searching, I realize that maybe I don't care about punctuations anymore. I care about stability, yet the fighting over punctuations... I'm out of decent words for this. "Endorse", enough, and move on.... though threatening someone with DS is... questionable. 2328:

In summary, of all the more or less relevant and useful sources as shown below, only two support the hyphened South-West Africa while five are inconsistent. The majority support the non-hyphened South West Africa, as it was used throughout the existence of the territory until it became independent as

1616:

Respectfully disagree. "Justice must be seen to be done" seems a bit of an overstatement given there's no dispute as to the actual onscreen and copyrighted title. But also to this point, if a neutral observer like this above editor sees the decision as reflect ing the consensus, then it appears as if

1500:

not "sufficiently substantiated" in what way? The closer of the RM was singled out in the close of the earlier RFC as singularly representative of the opposition to MOS:JR, and his comments in that RfC directly mirror his RM close (which is about his opinion, not the sources), as does his evident ire

1275:

An extraordinary ideological battleline? A composition title based on a fictional character, it stretches guidelines and precedents are unclear. I see a reasonable call of rough consensus to move, but "no consensus" would have been easily defended. The close should not be read as precedent setting.

791:

All I can do is repeat my post of 19:06, 31 December 2016, since your diatribe above did not refute any of my statements with any actual evidence or diffs, and instead reiterated your old opinions, which are decidedly in the minority, and made wild claims and accusations, threw out contentious labels

399:

This review has nothing to do with "the film's actual onscreen title"; it's about the fact that an involved admin made an outrageous close. By phrasing it as if the Film project is under some kind of attack from the MOS, you seem to be bring people who want to defend the move, rather than people who

734:

in favor of using the film's actual onscreen title with comma, despite a couple of WP:BIO editors believing WP:BIO guidelines for people supersede WP:FILM guidelines for film titles. Now those WP:BIO editors are trying to overturn the admin's decision. You may wish to comment — either to endorse the

586:

A biased close is a close by an editor who has at several places previously expressed a strong opinion on one side of the issue that is being discussed. An involved admin (or other editor) should recuse himself as a closer of a controversial discussion. This one was very controversial (with almost

538:

has to do with "the film's actual onscreen title", as opposed to one that is not the actual onscreen title. There is not one statement of opinion in my post. Every statement is factual, unless you'd like to take exception to the colloquial phrase "a couple of" by insisting it means literally two. If

1653:

That is right, in principle, but in this case I the position is over-exacting on the qualifications required by Nyttend to do the close. While I disagree that anything linked demonstrates that Nyttend was WP:INVOLVED, there is some evidence that Nyttend holds opinions, and his closing comments may

619:

canvassing. It was the furthest thing from a neutral notice, being a complete distortion of the nature of the discussion, and an exhortation to come defend an admin and WP:FILM against alleged encroachment by WP:BIO . Neither of those wikiprojects have anything to do with anything under discussion

230:

The instructions suggested I fill in a "reason why the page move should be reviewed". I didn't see any suggestion to keep it neutral, and I don't think such reasons ever are, since move review discussions are usually only opened when someone is outraged by a close. But thanks for following up with

829:

Dicklyon violates the canvassing rules by referring to Nytend's action as "an outrageous anti-MOS move close by an involved admin" adding the "closing statement and the fact that it's from an admin who had already taken a strong stand against the relevant guideline should not be allowed to stand."

567:

I have to wonder if you're being disingenuous or whether you've convinced yourself of what you're saying. You're calling it a biased because it went against you, even though it went against you for logical, well-articulated reasons that the majority of editors espoused. A biased close would be one

1012:

The name of such a well-known film does not refer to a living person, it is the real as well as common name of a film. Nothing to do with MOS:JR. It is not a complicated name or stylization either, just 'Steamboat Bill, Jr.', which easily is an understandable page name. How to say this clearer, I

928:

close, except for some of the rant part. The close was obvious, as the name of a fictional film about a fictional person with a fictional nickname, the way the film was promotionally and legally stylized contains a comma which is part of the films name. Taking WP:COMMONSENSE into account, I don't

2315:

and therefore at a point in time not applicable to the pre-independence South West Africa. These assignments of countries or areas to specific groupings was for statistical convenience and it is unlikely that the intent was for it to result in changes in the names of already defunct countries or

1597:

Looking through the original RM, it seems to me that the closer's decision did reflect the consensus; at least I would have closed it in the same way based on the discussion. However, that isn't, or shouldn't be, the issue here. Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done, and that

1059:

also use the style that varies from the guidleines. It simply is not the case here. WP is not "changing" a title to comply with MoS, we're using the known and well attested version of it, among multiple common versions, that complies with MoS. This is normal and is basic common sense. It's why

1238:

article. There is no argument as to the actual title of the film. So editors objecting to the close are arguing in favor of knowingly and deliberately falsifying a movie title in order to slavishly adhere to a single project's style guideline for names in WP:BIO and not movie titles at WP:FILM.

725:

behavior. It's beyond the damned pale that a vociferous anti-MOS:JR admin came anywhere near closing an RM discussion about that (populated mostly by the same people in the RfC, I might add) and then had the gall to issue threats. I kind of wish that had just gone straight to ArbCom as conduct

1565:

How exactly is "Let this be a firm warning: is disruptive and will result in sanctions if repeated" not to be perceived as a threat? I mean, we are clear on what the word "threat" means in the context, right? A menacing (i.e. "warning") promise (i.e. "threat") to do something punitive (i.e.

985:

This has no bearing on anything. As you well know, your attempts to limit MOS:JR strictly to bios, which was never intended (and is not in the guideline nor in the RfC results), have been rejected at RM after RM. It would be a completely nonsensical and reader- and editor-confusing result for

948:

supposed to close it. A neutral admin may agree to close it as MOVE, or may conclude NO CONSENSUS, but in any case we deserve an unbiased look and neutral analysis of the arguments. Also, this is not a place to repeat arguments such as "the way the film was promotionally and legally stylized

516:. I apologize for the boldface, but I don't know how I can make any clearer that a biography is a nonfiction of account of an actual person's life. Whereas a film title is not. Nor is the name of a magazine, or of a plant, or of a couch or of a planet. None of those things are biographies. -- 1080:

are that those titles; in the latter three cases, alternative presentations of those names (e.g. "Ipod", "Deamaus", and just "Hague") are virtually unknown in RS, while many RS refer to the first two as "Pink" and "Client" and the artists' own materials are not consistent on the matter, a

2272:, and will probably surface again. Rather than starting a war with yet another RM, a move review will hopefully get the issue settled once and for all and put an end to the back-and-forth renaming that occurred over the past decade. The intention to request a move review was 864:

I'm not sure what's unbelievable about someone voluntarily, and without input from me, posting his opinion on the wrong page and being pointed to the correct page. But for complete transparency, see my comment where I already addressed this, below at 18:52, 2 January 2017.

2357: 1778:'s comments placed within the closed request, rather than as a closing reason. I don't think I can say "overturn and reclose with the same result", and "overturn and reclose" risks having a clearly incorrect title, which could theoretically put Knowledge at legal risk. 1381:

per Randy Kryn, Tenebrae, Lugnuts, etc. A guideline for biographies should not be applied to titles of works of fiction. WP should be accurate to what a title actually is. Those that believe otherwise seem intent on drawing this out endlessly. The close was necessary. -

720:

what title this article ends up at (I gave my reasoning, and it either is sufficient or it's not; I've previously supported keeping a similar title with the comma, because it consistently appears that way unlike this case). What I do care about it this obvious anti-MoS

76:– I see a rough consensus that the ultimate decision to move is consistent with the state of the RM discussion at the time it was closed, but that the closing statement was unfortunately worded at best. In light of the strongly worded concerns about the closing admin's 986:

different rules to apply to "Jr./Sr." names depending on whether the person was fictional or not. Such an idea has been rejected in other ways for year (including spacing of initials, capitalization, etc.), across article titles, article text, and category names.

2351: 1341:

The title was factually incorrect for many years. There are probably a hundred thousand movies here, and just because it takes a while to get to all of them is no reason to knowingly and deliberately falsify this film's onscreen, copyrighted and well-known

211:

a neutral statement as required here. Aside from the ironically inflammatory language of "biased and inflammatory rant", it is only that editor's opinion that those who disagree with him are not following the guidelines of the MOS. At issue is the MOS

969:

Did he have a right to close it after having an opinion about another topic, that of removing commas from the names of things, memorials, or record albums named for real people? Steamboat Bill or Steamboat Bill, Jr. did not have an earthly existence.

400:

can look at the issue of Nyttend being involved and therefore ineligible to do the close. Furthermore, this nothing nothing to do with WP:BIO editors, whatever those are; if there's such a project, did you notifiy it? Did you notify at

587:

as many editors opposing as supporting), and the admin who closed it had no business doing so. A neutral admin might still close it with a move, but presumably if so would not threaten the opposers the way this one did.

2252:

was unaware of significant additional information not discussed in the RM and the RM should be reopened and relisted. The additional information is shown and linked to below and is also applicable to the related MR for

2063:

was never discussed in the discussion being reviewed. That means it would not have been a viable option for this particular request. There may be a case to move this to the proposed title but a separate move request is

2319:

The present page name makes South West Africa the only country in the world to have consistently issued postage stamps on which its own name was inscribed incorrectly. Since official postage stamps were discounted as

2345: 1598:

means the closer must both be and be seen to be neutral. Although Nyttend did not participate in the RM, previously expressed views make Nyttend's non-neutrality clear, and it was unwise to be the closer.

2363: 2709:

was unaware of significant additional information not discussed in the RM and the RM should be reopened and relisted. The additional information is shown and linked to in the related preceding MR for

1770:. There were no credible guideline-based arguments presented for the name without the comma, and there were credible guideline-based arguments presented for the name with the comma. Agree with 2383:

International Court of Justice - Case Summaries - Voting Procedure On Questions Relating To Reports And Petitions Concerning The Territory Of South-West Africa - Advisory Opinion of 7 June 1955

1459:

Supervote in the decision, or the additional comment, or both? I am not persuaded of supervote in the decision. Neither do I find the WP:INVOLVED allegation is sufficiently substantiated. --

1257:

This discussion is not about the comma or the move. It's about the close. It was inappropriate for an involved admin to close it, and then to provide such a biased and provocative analysis.

712:. That amounts to "You think it's canvassing but my buddies who I canvassed are backing me and saying its not canvassing", a.k.a. a wolf pack and a sheep deciding what's for dinner. See 1140:

act on this point is getting really, really tiresome. It's been going on for over two years now. Give it a rest. You trot out some comment like "a recognized masterpiece" or some other

245:

How about: "An admin close at WikiProject Film ruled against applying a WikiProject Biography style guideline for people's names. Some editors wish for this close to be reconsidered."--

2459:

Oxford Public International Law - South West Africa, Ethiopia v South Africa, Second Phase, (1966) ICJ Rep 6, ICGJ 158 (ICJ 1966), 18th July 1966, International Court of Justice (ICJ).

340:, "I, and I imagine the others, will be at any Move Review to support the close...". I suppose we'll need to make a more central announcement now, to avoid just more local consensus. 2776:

I see nothing wrong with the close, so it would probably be better to simply open a new move request with the evidence. Whatever happens, there should be a usage note in the article.

2539:

I see nothing wrong with the close, so it would probably be better to simply open a new move request with the evidence. Whatever happens, there should be a usage note in the article.

1671:"Let this be a firm warning: imposition of a MOS page to articles not under that page's scope, without firm consensus at talk, is disruptive and will result in sanctions if repeated" 1276:

I suggest a project space RFC reconsideration in no less than six months from the close of this review. Ideological tempers need to cool. This does not benefit the project. --

2756:(Disclosure: I requested the move in the first place.) I might be misunderstanding the process here. At the time of closing there was no opposition to the requested move. Closer 2373:

Some of the relevant and useful referenced sources are consistently inconsistent, in all cases showing the name hyphened in the heading but mostly without hyphen in the text.

302: 713: 2839: 2680: 2388:

International Court of Justice - Case Summaries - Admissibility Of Hearings Of Petitioners By The Committee On South-West Africa - Advisory Opinion of 1 June 1956

1945: 192:

admin, closed the discussion with a biased and inflammatory rant against people who prefer to follow the guidelines of the MOS. Details and evidence to follow.

2424:

Several additional useful sources concerning South West Africa were discovered, none of which is referred to in the article at all. None of them uses a hyphen.

336:

here, with his side of the issue only, and calls it "neutral notice" in the edit summary. I'm pretty sure that's explicitly not OK. And it was shortly after

1144:

PoV gush about the topic in one after another of these discussions, and it just demonstrates that you are not approaching these matters rationally but simply

2085: 2452: 1425:

Most of "endorse" comments above appear to be completely missing the point, and are re-arguing the move rationale. This MR isn't about that, it's about the

553:

The move discussion had a lot to do with that, but the review is about an involved editor doing a biased close, not about the merits of the move arguments.

2101:

No RM process or close to challenge. Go back to the talk page and discuss and work to a consensus. Personally, I see nothing wrong with the status quo. --

2397: 2392: 976:

is the real name of a quite prominent movie. But, yes, I can see your point as well. He gave you guys a good what for on your talk page and in the close.

1753:

Close was properly done based on interpretation of WP:COMMONNAME—one that was endorsed by consensus (and by common sense in the titling of movie names).

2387: 2382: 2377: 1709:- The closer's comments may have been worded harshly, but they accurately summarized the consensus at the RM discussion... which was that the title was 1227: 1365:

As it was moved to the correct title, per AFI, LOC, etc. If someone's got an issue with an admin's conduct, then go waste your time at ANI or Arbcom.

150: 2493:. The Railway Magazine with which is incorporated "Transport & Travel Monthly", September 1951. Tothill Press Limited, London. pp. 627-628, 631. 2324:

in the discussion, I consulted 20 of the 22 sources (two have dead links) listed in the “References” section of the article as well as several more.

80:

from several editors, I have also independently examined the original RM and am satisfied that I would also have closed it with the same result. –

902: 2223: 37: 2453:

1914-1918 Online – International Encyclopedia of the First World War - South African Invasion of German South West Africa (Union of South Africa)

298: 47: 675: 501: 1835:

Also spectactularly non-neutral, just like your bigger canvass before this. Do you just need to look up what "neutral" means or something?

2686: 2065: 625: 355:

Again, false. Here is the notice, broken into phrases, emphasis added. Tell me what sentence is anything other than straightforward fact:

1639:

needed to be above suspicion, and it was not, given the prior views of the closer. No more from me; we've all spent enough time on this.

1309:

Almost forgot, if I see punctuation-based title moves, any title should be discussed right away... I don't want to talk about my RMs at

1043:

that ignored all policy- and source-based arguments, as did the closer, who has a pre-set and strong view on the matter, having opposed

2346:

The South West Africa/Namibia Dispute – Documents and Scholarly Writings on the Controversy Between South Africa and the United Nations

2304: 156: 1893: 1847: 1578: 1517: 1441: 1172: 1101: 998: 765: 648: 2446: 2229: 2078:'Windows Millennium Edition' was not discussed in the recent review, therefore a new move request is in order, not a move review. 1400:(note: I moved Nyttend's closing statement to the top of the close template but did not alter it, and didn't participte otherwise) 2614: 2393:

International Court of Justice - Case Summaries - South-West Africa Cases (Preliminary Objections) - Judgment of 21 December 1962

2157: 2088: 2019: 1412: 431: 2428: 2378:

International Court of Justice - Case Summaries - International Status Of South-West Africa - Advisory Opinion of 11 July 1950

1473:

Yep, it's pretty much all bad-faith mud-slinging by people with sour-grapes who are arguing over a fucking comma. Jesus wept.

629: 329: 2721: 2698: 2650: 185: 42: 2025: 292: 478:

I was not aware of project biography, and as far as I know that project was in no way involved in this discussion. The

367:

despite a couple of WP:BIO editors believing WP:BIO guidelines for people supersede WP:FILM guidelines for film titles.

2082: 636:

in any way, and there is no principle codified at any of them that is applicable to this RM discussion or its review.

2795:

close of the unanimously supported move discussion, and encourage opening a new RM discussion with the new evidence.

2558:

close of the unanimously supported move discussion, and encourage opening a new RM discussion with the new evidence.

1222:

way that this well-known and historically important film is listed at every significant reference source, including

889:. Not just because of the inflammatory closing statement, but because Nyttend had previously expressed strong anti- 2739: 2502: 2479: 2463: 2406:

Only two referenced sources use only the hyphened version. One of these is a present-day establishment’s web page.

2398:

International Court of Justice - Case Summaries - South-West Africa Cases (Second Phase) - Judgment of 18 July 1966

2060: 333: 85: 2458: 21: 2646: 2599: 2254: 2069: 2049: 168: 120: 1121:

is both the common name and the real name of a recognized masterpiece. The close correctly acknowledges that.

2295:

During the discussion, reference was made repeatedly to the fact that South West Africa is not a part of the

2760:

was neither expected not allowed to consider further arguments. There was nothing wrong with their close. --

2523:

was neither expected not allowed to consider further arguments. There was nothing wrong with their close. --

1644: 1603: 709: 2468: 2288: 2267: 2261: 2241: 2193: 1793: 1635:

No, it appears to me, as to you, that justice was done; but for justice to have been seen to be done, the

1549: 1310: 750: 830:

The post is a clear violation of our canvassing policy, which requires any notice to be neutral in tone.

2815: 2735: 2630: 2578: 2498: 2475: 2411:

Newell M. Stultz (1974). Afrikaner Politics in South Africa, 1934-1948 - Epilogue: 1948 to 1970. p. 161.

2173: 2121: 1969: 1915: 1890: 1844: 1809:

For transparency, here is the complete text of the invitation, based on the the preference he expressed

1758: 1654:

have been overly strong, influenced by his opinion rather than deriving from the discussion closed. I "

1575: 1514: 1438: 1223: 1169: 1149: 1133: 1098: 995: 762: 645: 100: 81: 17: 1402:- there were a number of reasonable arguments against the move founded in precedents in application of 1128:

Randy, it's been explained to you probably close to 100 times by now that WP:COMMONNAME is the common

909:

maneuver. He is entitled to his opinion, and could have registered it by supporting the move instead.

2611: 2154: 1861:

If you would care to point out exactly what wording is neither factual nor neutral, please tell me --

1387: 1219: 2358:

Recueil des Cours – Collected courses of The Hague Academy of International Law. 1986-V. pp. 213-214

438:. Along with other behavioral guidelines you seem to be violating (see User:Calidum below), there's 2429:

Washington University Law Review, Volume 1967, Issue 2 - January 1967 - The South West Africa Cases

2106: 2045: 1954: 1689: 1464: 1426: 1318: 1298: 1281: 1145: 1117: 1048: 972: 906: 730: 465: 360: 116: 72: 2804: 2785: 2769: 2743: 2619: 2567: 2548: 2532: 2506: 2483: 2162: 2110: 2094: 2073: 2053: 1958: 1902: 1870: 1856: 1830: 1796: 1762: 1745: 1722: 1693: 1648: 1630: 1607: 1587: 1553: 1526: 1481: 1468: 1450: 1417: 1391: 1373: 1351: 1336: 1322: 1302: 1285: 1266: 1248: 1202: 1181: 1110: 1017: 1007: 980: 964: 933: 918: 874: 858: 840: 809: 774: 703: 657: 596: 581: 562: 548: 525: 491: 469: 451: 413: 386: 349: 268: 254: 240: 225: 201: 89: 2800: 2765: 2563: 2528: 2340:

UN General Assembly - Resolutions Adopted By The General Assembly During Its Twenty-First Session

1866: 1826: 1785:. This may or may not constitute canvassing, but I did express an opinion in both the RM and in 1740: 1718: 1640: 1626: 1599: 1488: 1347: 1332: 1262: 1244: 960: 914: 898: 870: 854: 805: 744: 699: 621: 592: 577: 558: 544: 521: 487: 447: 409: 401: 382: 345: 323: 264: 250: 236: 221: 197: 189: 77: 1327:

The title was stable for many years without the comma. Stability would argue for no move here.

2434: 2710: 2189: 2142: 1790: 1560: 1545: 1211: 1141: 1040: 722: 288: 179: 2440: 2725: 2273: 1884: 1838: 1754: 1569: 1508: 1432: 1163: 1092: 989: 756: 639: 2781: 2608: 2544: 2151: 2037: 1989: 1407: 1383: 1153: 1122: 1014: 977: 949:

contains a comma", especially as that just ignores the other promotional posters that did

930: 435: 955:

use the comma; misstatements of fact are OK at the RM, but have no place in the review.

2308: 2300: 2102: 1950: 1771: 1685: 1495: 1460: 1314: 1294: 1277: 1235: 1198: 1137: 717: 461: 2335:

Several of the relevant and mostly useful sources use no hyphen in South West Africa.

1115:

Pink is the common name of a person, not P!nk. Client is the common name of the band.

2833: 2796: 2761: 2559: 2524: 2415: 1862: 1822: 1782: 1731: 1714: 1622: 1541: 1343: 1328: 1258: 1240: 1234:

style guideline does not supersede overall Knowledge policy, and has no bearing on a

1231: 1065: 1061: 956: 910: 866: 850: 801: 740: 695: 674:. And, once again, since it seems as if "I can't hear you" is in play, MOS:JR is at 667: 588: 573: 554: 540: 517: 483: 443: 405: 378: 341: 319: 260: 246: 232: 217: 193: 2729: 2717: 2339: 2321: 2284: 2277: 1786: 1775: 1678: 1475: 1403: 1367: 1157: 833: 497: 439: 175: 1429:

by the closer, and the inappropriate administrative threats by an involved party.

845:

Unbelievably, after all the fuss, Tenebrae invites one more who opposed the move,

504:. Now, is a film title the biography of a person? No. A guideline that applies to 2469:

Issue on Namibia – Decolonization, Vol 1. No. 3. December 1974. p. 3, footnote 1.

2757: 2706: 2520: 2249: 2352:

Mediating Conflict – Decision-making and western intervention in Namibia. p. 46

303:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive286#Requested_Move:_Steamboat_Bill

2777: 2540: 2435:

Encyclopædia Britannica - German South West Africa – Historical State, Namibia

2044:

The actual name of the product is Windows Millennium Edition, not Windows ME

1985: 216:, WP:BIO, which applies to people's names and not to WP:FILM movie titles. -- 2296: 1194: 1077: 714:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Canvassing by Darkknight2149

678:. I a film title the biography of a person? No. A guideline that applies to 2441:

Encyclopædia Britannica - SWAPO Party of Namibia – Political Party, Namibia

572:

logical, well-articulated reasons that the majority of editors espoused. --

539:

so I'll be happy to change that to the actual number in the discussion. --

1073: 2416:

Namibia – The Cardboard Box Travel Shop - Zambezi Region (Caprivi Strip)

2312: 624:

from either project. Neither of relevant actual site-wide guidelines,

479: 1044: 894: 890: 633: 370:

Now those WP:BIO editors are trying to overturn the admin's decision.

293:

User_talk:Nyttend/Archive_41#Your_belligerent.2C_aggressive_statement

1230:. "Ignored all policy- and source-based arguments"? Again, false. A 299:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Requested Move: Steamboat Bill

2464:

Duke Law Journal - South West Africa Cases: Preliminary Objections

901:. And in past years he has made many anti-MOS noises, such as at 1134:

is not, never has been, and never will be a "common style" policy

1069: 1047:

at the Village Pump RfC about it in February, and who obviously

1774:'s proposed modification of the closing reason, possibly with 364:

in favor of using the film's actual onscreen title with comma,

1942:. Please do another RM soon over there if you are concerned. 434:. "WP:BIO" is clearly a misremembering of the highly similar 2447:

Foreign Affairs - The South West Africa Case: What Happened?

2364:

Documents Officiels de la ... Session de L'Assemblée Général

2311:, nearly a decade after the establishment of an independent 2724:

on 14 December. The intention to request a move review was

1089:, not one's nationalistic, prescriptive style preferences. 737:

Knowledge:Move review/Log/2016 December#Steamboat Bill, Jr.

887:

Overturn, relist, and wait for a neutral admin to close it

2260:

The hyphen issue has come up at least twice in the past,

289:

User talk:Nyttend#Your belligerent, aggressive statement

2693: 2673: 2665: 2657: 2236: 2216: 2208: 2200: 2032: 2012: 2004: 1996: 1810: 1052: 846: 827: 337: 315: 163: 143: 135: 127: 2059:

This needs to be closed since renaming the article to

500:, which your side has quoted, you will see it goes to 1210:

The arguments for overturning it are simply false. "

2342:(This covers the period from 20 Sep to 20 Dec 1966) 430:You and anyone else here knows very well we have a 259:WikiProject Biography was in no way involved here. 1228:at the Library of Congress' National Film Registry 903:Talk:Harrison–Crawford State Forest#Requested move 1039:obvious at all, since most of the responses were 620:here, and this is not a slapping contest between 1214:"? No, because the comma is part of the actual, 897:to non-biography titles, e.g. at my talk page: 1881:"Legal risk"? WTH are you even talking about? 281:See also these related discussions of the close 2607:. Consensus is that the closure was in order. 2150:. Consensus is that the closure was in order. 2732:whose original move was reverted by this RM. 2728:. So far, no reaction has been received from 2280:whose original move was reverted by this RM. 2276:. So far, no reaction has been received from 893:sentiments and particularly against applying 8: 2629:The following is an archived debate of the 2303:, which was defined as such in 1999 by the 2172:The following is an archived debate of the 1968:The following is an archived debate of the 929:know how else he was supposed to close it. 99:The following is an archived debate of the 2592: 2135: 1929: 375:either to endorse the admin's close or not 65: 1665:. Local consensus is in favor of moving." 736: 2840:Knowledge move review monthly listings 727: 1661:"The result of the move request was: 676:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Biographies 502:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Biographies 7: 1068:are not at "P!nk" and "CLIEИT", but 2818:of the page listed in the heading. 2581:of the page listed in the heading. 2124:of the page listed in the heading. 1918:of the page listed in the heading. 1677:"This title is not within scope of 728:"An admin closed the discussion at 358:"An admin closed the discussion at 1658:" his first 15 words of the close, 28: 1668:but !vote to alter the remainder 1781:Note that I was invited here by 747:) 03:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)" 482:subpage is not about a project. 2814:The above is an archive of the 2577:The above is an archive of the 2120:The above is an archive of the 1914:The above is an archive of the 432:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 1621:seen that justice was done. -- 1224:at the American Film Institute 1: 2805:22:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 2786:01:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 2770:18:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 2744:14:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 2568:22:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 2549:01:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 2533:18:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 2507:12:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 2484:14:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 2111:06:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2095:04:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 2074:18:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 2054:02:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 1959:01:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 1882: 1836: 1631:21:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 1608:20:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 1567: 1554:13:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 1506: 1482:09:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 1469:05:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 1451:04:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 1430: 1418:13:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1392:09:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1374:08:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1352:16:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1337:15:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1323:08:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1303:08:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1286:04:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1267:03:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1249:03:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1203:23:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 1161: 1125:3:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 1111:22:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 1090: 1018:22:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 1008:22:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 987: 981:22:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 965:21:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 934:21:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 919:21:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 841:17:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 754: 704:19:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 658:04:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 637: 626:WP:Naming conventions (films) 597:05:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 582:00:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 563:22:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 549:19:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 526:00:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 492:22:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 470:05:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 452:19:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 414:17:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 387:16:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 350:04:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 255:17:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 241:04:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 226:03:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 202:21:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 30: 2620:14:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC) 2163:14:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC) 1903:17:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 1871:19:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 1857:18:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 1713:within the scope of WP:JR. 1588:18:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 1527:18:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 1182:17:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 810:19:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 775:18:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 694:seems disingenuous to me. -- 269:18:38, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 231:your alternative viewpoint. 90:05:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC) 1831:18:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 1797:18:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 1763:05:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 1746:01:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 1723:12:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 1694:11:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 1649:10:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 875:01:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 859:00:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 2856: 2722:discussion about this move 2289:discussion about this move 2061:Windows Millennium Edition 899:User talk:Dicklyon#Hoaxing 735:admin's close or not — at 373:You may wish to comment — 2726:discussed with the closer 2455:(Last update 15 Aug 2016) 2443:(Last update 29 Apr 2011) 2274:discussed with the closer 508:— as in "Manual of Style/ 496:I believe if you look at 2821:Please do not modify it. 2647:German South-West Africa 2636:Please do not modify it. 2600:German South-West Africa 2584:Please do not modify it. 2489:Lee, Charles E. (1951). 2449:(Published October 1966) 2437:(Last update 6 Dec 2016) 2297:United Nations subregion 2255:German South-West Africa 2179:Please do not modify it. 2127:Please do not modify it. 1975:Please do not modify it. 1921:Please do not modify it. 1819:("Endorse" or "Oppose"). 1085:parallel to this case. 822:Canvassing notice, redux 106:Please do not modify it. 2720:quidelines, I opened a 2491:The Walfish Bay Railway 2287:quidelines, I opened a 1051:. See longer comments 632:, are in conflict with 630:WP:Manual of Style/Film 1683: 1673: 1667: 1311:Talk:Exile on Main St. 942:Randy, clearly he was 1675: 1669: 1659: 18:Knowledge:Move review 1728:Overturn and reclose 1540:. There was a clear 512:— does not apply to 43:Move review archives 2633:of the page above. 2305:Statistics Division 2176:of the page above. 1972:of the page above. 1813:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 1118:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 1033:Overturn and relist 973:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 731:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 404:? No, you didn't. 361:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 334:WP:WikiProject Film 301:. (now archived to 214:of a single project 117:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 103:of the page above. 73:Steamboat Bill, Jr. 1087:Follow the sources 1035:. This close was 749:Sure looks like a 682:does not apply to 460:I was confused. -- 207:Note that that is 2828: 2827: 2716:According to the 2711:South-West Africa 2617: 2591: 2590: 2283:According to the 2190:South-West Africa 2160: 2143:South-West Africa 2134: 2133: 1949: 1946:non-admin closure 1928: 1927: 1492: 1401: 1136:. Your constant 1057:very consistently 440:assume good faith 310:Canvassing notice 291:(now archived to 56: 55: 2847: 2823: 2736:André Kritzinger 2696: 2676: 2668: 2660: 2638: 2615: 2593: 2586: 2499:André Kritzinger 2476:André Kritzinger 2431:(Published 1967) 2360:(Published 1987) 2354:(Published 1990) 2348:(Published 1973) 2322:reliable sources 2291:on 14 December. 2239: 2219: 2211: 2203: 2181: 2158: 2136: 2129: 2093: 2035: 2015: 2007: 1999: 1977: 1943: 1940:Procedural close 1930: 1923: 1901: 1855: 1743: 1738: 1586: 1564: 1525: 1499: 1486: 1478: 1449: 1399: 1370: 1180: 1160:, for starters. 1109: 1006: 838: 836: 796:, which are not 773: 710:WP:WIKILAWYERING 656: 166: 146: 138: 130: 108: 66: 52: 36: 31: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2830: 2829: 2819: 2692: 2691: 2685: 2679: 2672: 2671: 2664: 2663: 2656: 2655: 2634: 2582: 2235: 2234: 2228: 2222: 2215: 2214: 2207: 2206: 2199: 2198: 2177: 2125: 2079: 2031: 2030: 2024: 2018: 2011: 2010: 2003: 2002: 1995: 1994: 1973: 1919: 1899: 1853: 1741: 1732: 1584: 1558: 1523: 1493: 1476: 1447: 1415: 1368: 1313:, thank you. -- 1178: 1132:policy, and it 1107: 1004: 834: 832: 771: 751:WP:BATTLEGROUND 654: 534:And the review 338:telling Nyttend 162: 161: 155: 149: 142: 141: 134: 133: 126: 125: 104: 64: 57: 50: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 2853: 2851: 2843: 2842: 2832: 2831: 2826: 2825: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2789: 2788: 2773: 2772: 2705:The RM closer 2703: 2702: 2689: 2683: 2677: 2669: 2661: 2653: 2641: 2640: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2589: 2588: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2552: 2551: 2536: 2535: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2466: 2461: 2456: 2450: 2444: 2438: 2432: 2419: 2418: 2413: 2401: 2400: 2395: 2390: 2385: 2380: 2368: 2367: 2361: 2355: 2349: 2343: 2326: 2325: 2317: 2309:United Nations 2301:Western Africa 2248:The RM closer 2246: 2245: 2232: 2226: 2220: 2212: 2204: 2196: 2184: 2183: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2132: 2131: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2098: 2097: 2076: 2066:64.229.167.158 2046:Maria Kappatou 2042: 2041: 2028: 2022: 2016: 2008: 2000: 1992: 1980: 1979: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1926: 1925: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1897: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1851: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1768:Endorse Result 1765: 1748: 1725: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1638: 1611: 1610: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1582: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1521: 1503:New York Times 1484: 1454: 1453: 1445: 1420: 1411: 1394: 1376: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1306: 1305: 1288: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1252: 1251: 1216:onscreen title 1205: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1176: 1150:WP:GREATWRONGS 1148:. Please see 1131: 1105: 1084: 1058: 1038: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1002: 937: 936: 922: 921: 883: 882: 878: 877: 824: 823: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 769: 753:warcry to me. 661: 660: 652: 618: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 392: 391: 390: 389: 371: 368: 365: 312: 311: 307: 306: 296: 285: 284: 282: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 173: 172: 159: 153: 147: 139: 131: 123: 111: 110: 95: 94: 93: 92: 63: 58: 54: 53: 45: 40: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2852: 2841: 2838: 2837: 2835: 2824: 2822: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2791: 2790: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2753: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2712: 2708: 2700: 2695: 2688: 2682: 2675: 2667: 2659: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2639: 2637: 2632: 2627: 2626: 2621: 2618: 2612: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2587: 2585: 2580: 2575: 2574: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2554: 2553: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2470: 2467: 2465: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2423: 2417: 2414: 2412: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2405: 2399: 2396: 2394: 2391: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2372: 2371:Inconsistent. 2365: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2334: 2330: 2323: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2290: 2286: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2265: 2264: 2258: 2256: 2251: 2243: 2238: 2231: 2225: 2218: 2210: 2202: 2195: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2175: 2170: 2169: 2164: 2161: 2155: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2130: 2128: 2123: 2118: 2117: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2087: 2084: 2077: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2039: 2034: 2027: 2021: 2014: 2006: 1998: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1978: 1976: 1971: 1966: 1965: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1947: 1941: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1924: 1922: 1917: 1912: 1911: 1904: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1887: 1880: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1849: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1814: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1751:Endorse Close 1749: 1747: 1744: 1739: 1737: 1736: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707:Endorse Close 1705: 1704: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1682: 1680: 1672: 1666: 1664: 1657: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641:Peter coxhead 1636: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600:Peter coxhead 1596: 1593: 1589: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542:supermajority 1539: 1538:Endorse close 1536: 1535: 1528: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1504: 1497: 1490: 1489:edit conflict 1485: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1405: 1398: 1397:Endorse close 1395: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1380: 1379:Endorse close 1377: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1364: 1363:Endorse close 1361: 1360: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291:Endorse close 1289: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220:WP:COMMONNAME 1217: 1213: 1209: 1208:Endorse close 1206: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191:Endorse close 1189: 1183: 1174: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1088: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1066:Client (band) 1063: 1062:Pink (singer) 1056: 1054: 1050: 1049:WP:Supervoted 1046: 1042: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1019: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1000: 997: 994: 992: 984: 983: 982: 979: 975: 974: 968: 967: 966: 962: 958: 954: 953: 947: 946: 941: 940: 939: 938: 935: 932: 927: 924: 923: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 885: 884: 880: 879: 876: 872: 868: 863: 862: 861: 860: 856: 852: 848: 843: 842: 839: 837: 828: 821: 820: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 776: 767: 764: 761: 759: 752: 748: 746: 742: 738: 733: 732: 724: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 664: 663: 662: 659: 650: 647: 644: 642: 635: 631: 627: 623: 616: 614: 613: 598: 594: 590: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 566: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 537: 533: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 471: 467: 463: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 415: 411: 407: 403: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 366: 363: 362: 357: 356: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 328: 325: 321: 317: 309: 308: 304: 300: 297: 294: 290: 287: 286: 283: 280: 279: 270: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243: 242: 238: 234: 229: 228: 227: 223: 219: 215: 210: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 184: 181: 177: 170: 165: 158: 152: 145: 137: 129: 122: 118: 115: 114: 113: 112: 109: 107: 102: 97: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 70: 69: 68: 67: 62: 61:2016 December 59: 49: 46: 44: 41: 39: 38:2016 November 33: 32: 23: 19: 2820: 2813: 2792: 2751: 2749: 2734: 2715: 2704: 2635: 2628: 2604: 2598: 2583: 2576: 2555: 2514: 2512: 2497: 2490: 2474: 2421: 2420: 2404:With hyphen. 2403: 2402: 2370: 2369: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2316:territories. 2282: 2268: 2262: 2259: 2247: 2178: 2171: 2147: 2141: 2126: 2119: 2086:CleverPhrase 2081: 2080: 2043: 1974: 1967: 1939: 1935: 1920: 1913: 1885: 1839: 1818: 1812: 1811:here on the 1791:Arthur Rubin 1767: 1750: 1734: 1733: 1727: 1710: 1706: 1676: 1670: 1662: 1660: 1655: 1618: 1594: 1570: 1561:Softlavender 1546:Softlavender 1537: 1509: 1502: 1474: 1433: 1427:WP:SUPERVOTE 1422: 1396: 1378: 1366: 1362: 1290: 1215: 1207: 1190: 1164: 1116: 1093: 1086: 1032: 990: 971: 951: 950: 944: 943: 925: 907:WP:SUPERVOTE 886: 844: 831: 825: 797: 793: 757: 729: 692:a film title 691: 687: 684:a film title 683: 679: 671: 640: 622:WP:PROJPAGEs 569: 535: 514:a film title 513: 509: 505: 374: 359: 326: 313: 213: 208: 182: 174: 105: 98: 71: 60: 48:2017 January 2816:move review 2631:move review 2579:move review 2174:move review 2122:move review 1970:move review 1916:move review 1886:SMcCandlish 1840:SMcCandlish 1755:First Light 1571:SMcCandlish 1510:SMcCandlish 1434:SMcCandlish 1218:and is the 1165:SMcCandlish 1094:SMcCandlish 991:SMcCandlish 798:film titles 794:biographies 758:SMcCandlish 680:Biographies 641:SMcCandlish 510:Biographies 506:Biographies 190:WP:INVOLVED 101:move review 78:involvement 2609:Cúchullain 2422:No hyphen. 2366:(UN, 1949) 2333:No hyphen. 2269:here again 2152:Cúchullain 1986:Windows ME 1936:Windows ME 1408:Ivanvector 1384:Gothicfilm 1212:WP:ILIKEIT 1142:WP:PEACOCK 1123:Randy Kryn 1041:WP:ILIKEIT 1015:Randy Kryn 978:Randy Kryn 931:Randy Kryn 723:WP:FACTION 568:that went 536:explicitly 377:— at ." -- 332:) invites 2329:Namibia. 2103:SmokeyJoe 2064:needed.-- 1951:George Ho 1815:talk page 1772:SmokeyJoe 1686:SmokeyJoe 1496:SmokeyJoe 1461:SmokeyJoe 1315:George Ho 1295:George Ho 1278:SmokeyJoe 1146:emotively 1078:The Hague 688:biography 462:SmokeyJoe 316:this edit 82:T. Canens 2834:Category 2797:Dicklyon 2762:Pgallert 2750:Endorse 2605:endorsed 2603:– Close 2560:Dicklyon 2525:Pgallert 2513:Endorse 2148:endorsed 2146:– Close 1863:Tenebrae 1823:Tenebrae 1783:Tenebrae 1735:Mandruss 1715:Blueboar 1674:to read 1623:Tenebrae 1344:Tenebrae 1342:title.-- 1329:Dicklyon 1259:Dicklyon 1241:Tenebrae 1154:WP:TRUTH 1074:Deadmau5 957:Dicklyon 911:Dicklyon 867:Tenebrae 851:Dicklyon 802:Tenebrae 741:Tenebrae 696:Tenebrae 668:Dicklyon 666:You and 589:Dicklyon 574:Tenebrae 555:Dicklyon 541:Tenebrae 518:Tenebrae 484:Dicklyon 444:Tenebrae 436:WP:WPBIO 406:Dicklyon 379:Tenebrae 342:Dicklyon 330:contribs 320:Tenebrae 261:Dicklyon 247:Tenebrae 233:Dicklyon 218:Tenebrae 194:Dicklyon 186:contribs 20:‎ | 2793:Endorse 2730:IvanR82 2687:archive 2666:history 2556:Endorse 2313:Namibia 2307:of the 2278:IvanR82 2230:archive 2209:history 2026:archive 2005:history 1776:Nyttend 1656:Endorse 1637:process 1595:Comment 1477:Lugnuts 1423:Comment 1369:Lugnuts 1236:WP:FILM 1138:WP:IDHT 926:Endorse 835:Calidum 718:WP:DGAF 672:or not' 570:against 480:MOS:BIO 176:Nyttend 157:archive 136:history 2758:Fuortu 2754:close: 2707:Fuortu 2521:Fuortu 2517:close: 2250:Fuortu 2083:Insert 1794:(talk) 1232:WP:BIO 1083:direct 1076:, and 1045:MOS:JR 895:MOS:JR 891:MOS:JR 881:Survey 634:MOS:JR 402:WT:MOS 188:), an 2778:Srnec 2718:WP:MR 2694:watch 2681:links 2541:Srnec 2285:WP:MR 2237:watch 2224:links 2033:watch 2020:links 1789:. — 1787:WP:AN 1679:WP:JR 1663:MOVED 1413:Edits 1404:WP:JR 1158:WP:TE 1053:at AN 826:Here 708:Nice 498:WP:JR 164:watch 151:links 51:: --> 16:< 2801:talk 2782:talk 2766:talk 2752:move 2740:talk 2674:logs 2658:edit 2651:talk 2564:talk 2545:talk 2529:talk 2515:move 2503:talk 2480:talk 2266:and 2263:here 2217:logs 2201:edit 2194:talk 2107:talk 2089:Here 2070:talk 2050:talk 2013:logs 1997:edit 1990:talk 1955:talk 1867:talk 1827:talk 1821:" -- 1759:talk 1719:talk 1690:talk 1645:talk 1627:talk 1604:talk 1550:talk 1465:talk 1388:talk 1348:talk 1333:talk 1319:talk 1299:talk 1282:talk 1263:talk 1245:talk 1226:and 1199:talk 1195:Deor 1130:name 1070:iPod 1064:and 961:talk 915:talk 871:talk 855:talk 847:here 806:talk 800:. -- 745:talk 700:talk 690:and 628:and 593:talk 578:talk 559:talk 545:talk 522:talk 488:talk 466:talk 448:talk 442:. -- 410:talk 383:talk 346:talk 324:talk 265:talk 251:talk 237:talk 222:talk 198:talk 180:talk 144:logs 128:edit 121:talk 86:talk 35:< 2697:) ( 2299:of 2240:) ( 2036:) ( 1900:ⱷ≼ 1896:≽ⱷ҅ 1854:ⱷ≼ 1850:≽ⱷ҅ 1711:not 1617:it 1585:ⱷ≼ 1581:≽ⱷ҅ 1524:ⱷ≼ 1520:≽ⱷ҅ 1448:ⱷ≼ 1444:≽ⱷ҅ 1179:ⱷ≼ 1175:≽ⱷ҅ 1108:ⱷ≼ 1104:≽ⱷ҅ 1037:not 1005:ⱷ≼ 1001:≽ⱷ҅ 952:not 945:not 772:ⱷ≼ 768:≽ⱷ҅ 655:ⱷ≼ 651:≽ⱷ҅ 615:It 314:In 209:not 167:) ( 22:Log 2836:: 2803:) 2784:) 2768:) 2742:) 2713:. 2699:RM 2566:) 2547:) 2531:) 2505:) 2482:) 2257:. 2242:RM 2109:) 2072:) 2052:) 2038:RM 1957:) 1938:– 1883:— 1869:) 1837:— 1829:) 1761:) 1721:) 1692:) 1684:-- 1647:) 1629:) 1619:is 1606:) 1568:— 1552:) 1507:— 1505:? 1467:) 1431:— 1416:) 1410:(/ 1390:) 1350:) 1335:) 1321:) 1301:) 1284:) 1265:) 1247:) 1239:-- 1201:) 1162:— 1156:, 1152:, 1091:— 1072:, 988:— 963:) 917:) 873:) 865:-- 857:) 849:. 808:) 755:— 739:-- 702:) 638:— 617:is 595:) 580:) 561:) 547:) 524:) 490:) 468:) 450:) 412:) 385:) 348:) 318:, 267:) 253:) 239:) 224:) 200:) 169:RM 88:) 2799:( 2780:( 2764:( 2738:( 2701:) 2690:| 2684:| 2678:| 2670:| 2662:| 2654:| 2649:( 2616:c 2613:/ 2562:( 2543:( 2527:( 2501:( 2478:( 2244:) 2233:| 2227:| 2221:| 2213:| 2205:| 2197:| 2192:( 2159:c 2156:/ 2105:( 2068:( 2048:( 2040:) 2029:| 2023:| 2017:| 2009:| 2001:| 1993:| 1988:( 1953:( 1948:) 1944:( 1898:ᴥ 1894:¢ 1891:☏ 1888:☺ 1865:( 1852:ᴥ 1848:¢ 1845:☏ 1842:☺ 1825:( 1757:( 1742:☎ 1717:( 1688:( 1681:" 1643:( 1625:( 1602:( 1583:ᴥ 1579:¢ 1576:☏ 1573:☺ 1563:: 1559:@ 1548:( 1522:ᴥ 1518:¢ 1515:☏ 1512:☺ 1498:: 1494:@ 1491:) 1487:( 1463:( 1446:ᴥ 1442:¢ 1439:☏ 1436:☺ 1386:( 1346:( 1331:( 1317:( 1297:( 1280:( 1261:( 1243:( 1197:( 1177:ᴥ 1173:¢ 1170:☏ 1167:☺ 1106:ᴥ 1102:¢ 1099:☏ 1096:☺ 1003:ᴥ 999:¢ 996:☏ 993:☺ 959:( 913:( 869:( 853:( 804:( 770:ᴥ 766:¢ 763:☏ 760:☺ 743:( 698:( 653:ᴥ 649:¢ 646:☏ 643:☺ 591:( 576:( 557:( 543:( 520:( 486:( 464:( 446:( 408:( 381:( 344:( 327:· 322:( 305:) 295:) 263:( 249:( 235:( 220:( 196:( 183:· 178:( 171:) 160:| 154:| 148:| 140:| 132:| 124:| 119:( 84:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Move review/Log/2016 December - Knowledge

Index