410:, the title should either be redirected to the article on the case in the lower court (if this case fulfills the requirement of this guideline), or redirected to the section of the Law Report that discusses it. In cases where the judgments are public domain, the case should then be linked to the text of the summary order on Wikisource.
21:
130:
176:
181:
281:
When applying the general notability guideline, the notability of the parties to a case (e.g. celebrities) is not sufficient to establish the notability of that case.
375:
87:
111:
207:
451:
43:
28:
297:
are nevertheless considered notable if they are non-temporary members of a high court as described below. This excludes judges appointed
80:
39:
370:
are assessed by applying the general notability guideline (in practice, they are almost always notable). For example, the topic of
123:
200:
142:
137:
99:
335:
118:
104:
94:
428:
171:
38:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
149:
166:
193:
424:
274:
374:
in general is notable, but an article on the individual Crown Court in
Aylesbury should be redirected to a
294:
70:
63:
56:
387:
35:
317:
that fails the general notability guideline is nevertheless considered notable if it is a high court.
233:
432:
346:
339:
324:
305:, or as temporary replacements for recused or otherwise unavailable regular members of the court.
273:
systems) or practically binding (as is generally the case with decisions of the highest courts in
420:
435:) does not prevent the court at issue from being a high court for the purpose of this guideline.
359:
are to a substantial degree not subject to review by other courts. Examples include the several
250:
A court case that fails the general notability guideline is nevertheless notable if it fulfills
331:
302:
266:
356:
290:
221:
350:
262:
419:
The availability of review of some questions of law by other high courts with a narrow
220:
This guideline determines whether the law-related subject of an article that fails the
445:
407:
360:
258:
It is the subject of a reasoned opinion of the highest court in a legal jurisdiction.
371:
270:
15:
241:
320:
For the purpose of this guideline, "high courts" are
289:
Judges who fail other notability guidelines such as
388:User:Bearian/Standards#Notability of attorneys
201:
8:
330:In common law systems, courts that can set
208:
194:
52:
399:
158:
69:
62:
55:
7:
224:(WP:GNG) is nevertheless notable.
14:
452:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals
19:
336:United States courts of appeals
254:of the following requirements:
1:
222:general notability guideline
64:General notability guideline
182:Why was my article deleted?
131:Organizations and companies
71:Subject-specific guidelines
468:
231:
376:list of individual courts
361:supreme courts of Germany
349:. These are courts whose
177:Common deletion outcomes
42:or initiate a thread at
345:In civil law systems,
351:determinations of law
347:courts of last resort
433:constitutional court
340:state supreme courts
334:. (Examples include
325:International courts
88:Astronomical objects
143:Sports and athletes
112:Geographic features
421:standard of review
303:arbitral tribunals
301:, as is common in
406:In the case of a
332:binding precedent
265:that is formally
218:
217:
172:Guide to deletion
167:Notability essays
51:
50:
459:
436:
417:
411:
404:
315:individual court
244:
210:
203:
196:
53:
44:the village pump
23:
22:
16:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
457:
456:
442:
441:
440:
439:
418:
414:
405:
401:
396:
384:
311:
287:
263:legal precedent
248:
247:
240:
236:
230:
214:
154:
47:
20:
12:
11:
5:
465:
463:
455:
454:
444:
443:
438:
437:
412:
398:
397:
395:
392:
391:
390:
383:
380:
368:Types of court
365:
364:
343:
328:
310:
307:
286:
283:
279:
278:
259:
246:
245:
237:
232:
229:
226:
216:
215:
213:
212:
205:
198:
190:
187:
186:
185:
184:
179:
174:
169:
161:
160:
156:
155:
153:
152:
146:
145:
140:
134:
133:
127:
126:
121:
115:
114:
108:
107:
102:
97:
91:
90:
84:
83:
77:
74:
73:
67:
66:
60:
59:
49:
48:
34:
33:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
464:
453:
450:
449:
447:
434:
431:or a special
430:
426:
423:(such as the
422:
416:
413:
409:
408:summary order
403:
400:
393:
389:
386:
385:
382:User criteria
381:
379:
377:
373:
369:
362:
358:
355:
352:
348:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
323:
322:
321:
318:
316:
308:
306:
304:
300:
296:
295:WP:POLITICIAN
292:
284:
282:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:It has set a
260:
257:
256:
255:
253:
243:
239:
238:
235:
227:
225:
223:
211:
206:
204:
199:
197:
192:
191:
189:
188:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
164:
163:
162:
157:
151:
148:
147:
144:
141:
139:
136:
135:
132:
129:
128:
125:
122:
120:
117:
116:
113:
110:
109:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
79:
78:
76:
75:
72:
68:
65:
61:
58:
54:
45:
41:
40:the talk page
37:
32:
30:
25:
18:
17:
415:
402:
372:Crown Courts
367:
366:
353:
319:
314:
312:
298:
288:
280:
251:
249:
219:
26:
150:Web content
271:common law
57:Notability
27:This is a
277:systems).
275:civil law
81:Academics
36:Consensus
31:proposal.
446:Category
338:or U.S.
242:WP:CASES
234:Shortcut
159:See also
267:binding
124:Numbers
427:, the
309:Courts
299:ad hoc
291:WP:BIO
285:Judges
138:People
100:Events
29:failed
394:Notes
357:facts
228:Cases
119:Music
105:Films
95:Books
429:ECHR
269:(in
425:ECJ
354:and
313:An
293:or
252:any
448::
378:.
363:.)
342:.)
327:.
209:e
202:t
195:v
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.