Knowledge

:Notability (local interests)/failed - Knowledge

Source 📝

68: 31: 403:
People, groups of people who are known locally and businesses and organizations that cater only to the local population are notable if there are multiple published sources (such as news articles) exclusively about the subject. A published newspaper that describes the person or business just as one of
382:
can be a useful source of this information. Books that tell substantial information about a street, even if just part of a book, are valid toward meeting this criteria. However, reports to the commission, which are found on Google Books, but often mention every street within a city, are not valid for
304:
The numerical population of an area has no meaning in terms of defining an area as local or not. No major city gains a special status as being beyond local due to having a very high population, and larger regions that go beyond being a city or town are not brought down to being "local" because their
495:
Most likely, an article on a local interest will be created by someone who lives in the area, has previously lived there, or has spent a significant amount of time there. This is perfectly acceptable, and in fact encouraged, provided that those creating these articles are aware of these guidelines.
377:
In every large city, there are thousands of streets. There are several published maps of each city that show in detail every street. But the mere fact that multiple street maps show that street does not make it notable. The street may also gain occasional mention when a news event, such as a crime,
261:
is a subject that is likely only to be known by and only to be of interest to those within a limited geographical area, such as a city, town, village, metropolitan area, or other similar localized region. Articles on local interests are perfectly acceptable for inclusion on Knowledge, provided they
460:
Television and radio broadcasts can only be reached within the localized region, and newspapers that are only delivered to those within such a region, are considered to be local sources. Though the information contained within them is often available by accessing their web sites, which can be done
482:
For this purpose, directories, such as maps and travel guides, even if published and marketed to those outside the city, are not considered non-local and do not meet inclusion criteria. Also, trivial mention in a non-notable news event does not qualify. Reports to the commission of a city, though
445:
A local interest is also considered to be notable for inclusion if it is sourced by a minimum of two (2) separate non-local sources. Once the minimum two sources are provided, there is no limit to the number of local sources that can be used to verify any other information. Lacking two non-local
273:
subjects for which thousands exist in each city and town, or those for which the single version that exists in that city or town is identical to every other, and if an article were to be included on each one, there would be more articles on these than there are total articles on Knowledge today.
436:
There are many types of government agencies that are found in most jurisdictions, such as a police department, fire department, library system, and one or more post offices. Generally, these should be described within the article on the jurisdiction they represent. But these are notable for
297:, is generally considered "local." There are many topics pertaining to regions like this in which the only sources can only be found locally. Meanwhile, larger regions with cities spaced by uninhabited or minimally inhabited areas, such as the 437:
standalone articles if they are mentioned in multiple sources on the agency itself. Though many will be routinely mentioned in the local news, such mention in news articles primarily pertaining to another subject does not render them notable.
395:. However, they may be created as redirects to the city, town, or neighborhood they represent, provided that it be the most accurate location they describe. Since many of them are just a number, they should be disambiguated appropriately. 404:
many subjects pertaining to a topic (such as an article on a city council describing many council people, or an article on restaurants within a town square) does not make a subject notable for a standalone article. Additionally,
427:
Buildings and structures are notable if they are mentioned in multiple sources on the building or structure itself. These sources must provide information on the subject and not just provide trivial mention of it.
378:
occurs on the street. But this, likewise, does not convey notability. Streets are notable if they are mentioned in sources providing more than the rudimentary information about the streets, such as their history.
274:
Creating an article on such a subject is not totally forbidden. But if such an article is created, sources other than those that commonly found for each and every one of them would be required.
453:, that is, if it is marketed, broadcast, or otherwise made readily available to those from outside the city or town and its vicinity. Even if the source bears the name of the locality (e.g. 167: 213: 218: 244: 124: 365:
For certain local subjects, since so many exist in every city and town, or even when one exists in every city and town, sources must describe the subject
148: 266:. Sources from local papers and other materials found within the city or town can be used, and may even be exclusively used to establish notability. 282:
This page provides guidelines clarifying whether or not a topic is notable, particularly addressing concerns of what types of sources qualify as
17: 549: 525:
It is best to avoid proposing the article for deletion unless it is completely not notable even to have mention within another article.
49: 468:, are considered to be non-local, and may be used to establish notability. Media networks that broadcast to multiple regions, such as 53: 38: 237: 117: 534: 289:
The definition of a "local," thereby requiring sources from outside the region, depends on the context. A small town such as
160: 48:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
179: 174: 136: 155: 141: 131: 230: 208: 294: 186: 415:
Those who have received coverage for having committed or being victimized by crime are held by the guidelines of
203: 298: 383:
establishing notability. Still, they may be used to verify information once notability has been established.
293:, USA is clearly local. A major metropolitan area or a collection of adjacent cities or towns, such as the 412:, so mention, even in multiple sources, for a limited period of time does not render the subject notable. 107: 100: 93: 45: 518:
If no improvement is made to show notability beyond the local area, suggest the article be merged
454: 290: 479:
are considered to be non-local sources, even if they are marketed only within the local region.
313:
The following guidelines are commonly applicable for some local interests, and may be at issue:
408:
must be used, so multiple articles from the same newspaper do not establish notability. Also,
457:), if it is viewed to be of interest to those outside the area, it is considered non-local. 409: 317: 369:
rather than describing the subject together with many others just like it. Examples are:
509: 416: 329: 270: 81: 543: 323: 263: 487:, are not valid for establishing notability since they have the "directory" status. 484: 379: 283: 77: 353: 346: 465: 500:
If the notability of an existing local interest article is questioned
475:
Published books (other than maps, guides, and directories) with an
521:
If after a while, still no improvement is made, complete the merge
476: 469: 62: 25: 446:
sources does not automatically make the subject not notable.
352:
The past and present mayors of a city or town, if they meet
76:
Local interests are notable for inclusion, even if the only
80:
are from local media. Only those that are considered to be
464:Newspapers delivered to multiple regions, such as 449:A source is considered to be "non-local" if it is 461:from anywhere, they are still considered local. 515:tag on the article. Leave it there for a while. 238: 8: 472:, are likewise considered to be non-local. 341:Articles on the following may be created: 245: 231: 89: 264:Knowledge's general notability guidelines 345:All cities and towns themselves meeting 195: 106: 99: 92: 18:Knowledge:Notability (local interests) 356:guidelines, are entitled to articles. 305:overall population is extremely low. 7: 491:Creating articles on local interests 410:notability is not temporary mention 301:, are clearly not local regions. 24: 399:People, businesses, organizations 269:The only exceptions are various 66: 29: 451:independent of the local region 441:Subjects with non-local sources 535:Knowledge:Geographic imbalance 309:Commonly applicable guidelines 1: 320:- Notability is not temporary 332:- Notability (criminal acts) 286:independent of the subject. 101:General notability guideline 84:are not worthy of inclusion. 391:Postal codes are generally 219:Why was my article deleted? 168:Organizations and companies 108:Subject-specific guidelines 566: 550:Knowledge failed proposals 417:Notability (criminal acts) 295:New York metropolitan area 505:Start out by placing the 349:are entitled to articles. 423:Buildings and structures 299:Midwestern United States 214:Common deletion outcomes 74:This page in a nutshell: 52:or initiate a thread at 361:Additional requirements 326:- Knowledge is not news 125:Astronomical objects 432:Government agencies 278:Definition of local 180:Sports and athletes 149:Geographic features 455:The New York Times 291:Big Flat, Arkansas 255: 254: 209:Guide to deletion 204:Notability essays 88: 87: 61: 60: 557: 514: 508: 406:multiple sources 284:reliable sources 247: 240: 233: 90: 78:reliable sources 70: 69: 63: 54:the village pump 33: 32: 26: 565: 564: 560: 559: 558: 556: 555: 554: 540: 539: 531: 512: 506: 502: 493: 443: 434: 425: 401: 389: 375: 363: 339: 311: 280: 271:run-of-the-mill 251: 191: 82:run-of-the-mill 67: 57: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 563: 561: 553: 552: 542: 541: 538: 537: 530: 527: 523: 522: 519: 516: 501: 498: 492: 489: 442: 439: 433: 430: 424: 421: 400: 397: 388: 385: 374: 371: 362: 359: 358: 357: 350: 338: 335: 334: 333: 327: 321: 310: 307: 279: 276: 259:local interest 253: 252: 250: 249: 242: 235: 227: 224: 223: 222: 221: 216: 211: 206: 198: 197: 193: 192: 190: 189: 183: 182: 177: 171: 170: 164: 163: 158: 152: 151: 145: 144: 139: 134: 128: 127: 121: 120: 114: 111: 110: 104: 103: 97: 96: 86: 85: 71: 59: 58: 44: 43: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 562: 551: 548: 547: 545: 536: 533: 532: 528: 526: 520: 517: 511: 504: 503: 499: 497: 490: 488: 486: 483:published on 480: 478: 473: 471: 467: 462: 458: 456: 452: 447: 440: 438: 431: 429: 422: 420: 418: 413: 411: 407: 398: 396: 394: 386: 384: 381: 372: 370: 368: 360: 355: 351: 348: 344: 343: 342: 336: 331: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 315: 314: 308: 306: 302: 300: 296: 292: 287: 285: 277: 275: 272: 267: 265: 260: 248: 243: 241: 236: 234: 229: 228: 226: 225: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 201: 200: 199: 194: 188: 185: 184: 181: 178: 176: 173: 172: 169: 166: 165: 162: 159: 157: 154: 153: 150: 147: 146: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 129: 126: 123: 122: 119: 116: 115: 113: 112: 109: 105: 102: 98: 95: 91: 83: 79: 75: 72: 65: 64: 55: 51: 50:the talk page 47: 42: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 524: 494: 485:Google Books 481: 474: 463: 459: 450: 448: 444: 435: 426: 414: 405: 402: 392: 390: 387:Postal codes 380:Google Books 376: 366: 364: 340: 312: 303: 288: 281: 268: 258: 256: 73: 36: 393:not notable 324:WP:NOT#NEWS 187:Web content 94:Notability 37:This is a 466:USA Today 337:Inclusion 118:Academics 46:Consensus 41:proposal. 544:Category 529:See also 367:directly 318:WP:NTEMP 196:See also 373:Streets 330:WP:N/CA 161:Numbers 175:People 137:Events 39:failed 510:local 262:meet 156:Music 142:Films 132:Books 16:< 477:ISBN 354:WP:N 347:WP:N 470:CNN 546:: 513:}} 507:{{ 419:. 257:A 246:e 239:t 232:v 56:.

Index

Knowledge:Notability (local interests)
failed
Consensus
the talk page
the village pump
reliable sources
run-of-the-mill
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
Academics
Astronomical objects
Books
Events
Films
Geographic features
Music
Numbers
Organizations and companies
People
Sports and athletes
Web content
Notability essays
Guide to deletion
Common deletion outcomes
Why was my article deleted?
v
t
e
Knowledge's general notability guidelines

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.