380:
kinds of sources that are considered independent are those that have covered topics unrelated to the one at hand, such as periodicals. Books that discuss a film in a larger context or among other films are also potential sources; see this section's last paragraph regarding the amount of coverage in a source. Press releases, even if they are reprinted by sources unrelated to the production, are not considered independent.
53:
628:
have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing"
321:
of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." The link to the main article explains each criterion. A topic might be considered notable even if it only satisfies some of the criteria. Conversely, even if a topic is presumed to satisfy
873:
This criterion is secondary. Most films that satisfy this criterion already satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete. Standards have not yet been established to define a major award, but it's not to be doubted that an
Academy
567:
The film was successfully distributed domestically in a country that is not a major film producing country, and was produced by that country's equivalent of a "major film studio". Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been
379:
The source needs to be independent of the topic, meaning that the author and the publisher are not directly associated with the topic. Authors should not include members of the production, and publishers should not include the studio or companies working with it on the production and release. The
909:
This criterion ensures that our coverage of important films in small markets will be complete, particularly in the case of countries which do not have widespread internet connectivity (or do not have online archives of important film-related publications) and whose libraries and journals are not
742:
Please note that simply meeting the criteria above does not automatically mean an adapted character should have their own article. Before creating an article in the mainspace or moving a draft to the mainspace, please discuss on the draft's talk page, the film or television series' talk page, or
386:
The content guideline to identify reliable sources says, "Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both." Sources that have published materials in print (such as newspapers and other
838:
Many of these sources can provide valuable information, and point to other sources, but in themselves do not indicate a notable subject. Similar cases of publications where a mention does not establish notability may include: reviews that are part of a comprehensive review of ALL films in a
280:
This notability guideline for film-related articles helps decide whether a film-related topic should have its own article, and builds on the general notability guidelines and other core
Knowledge policies and guidelines, with additional criteria applicable to film.
536:
Some films that do not pass the above tests may still be notable, and should be evaluated on their own merits. The article's ability to attest to a film's notability through verifiable sources is significant. Some inclusionary criteria to consider are:
839:
particular festival, that don't assert anything regarding the notability of individual entries; other forms of comprehensive, non-selective coverage; and some web-based reviews by amateur critics who have not established their own notability as critics.
387:
periodicals) are reliable if their publication process is considered reliable. If these sources also publish materials online, then it is usually fair to assume that these materials have a similar publication process (see
471:
will be successful for a film meeting one or more of these criteria. However, meeting these criteria is not an absolute guarantee that
Knowledge should have a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to the film.
629:
production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography
541:
The film represents a unique accomplishment in cinema, is a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of a national cinema, with such verifiable claims as "The only
884:
371:
One of the general notability guideline's criteria is that coverage should come from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This section discusses a source's independence and reliability.
781:, or similar databases, can provide valuable information including links to reviews, articles, and media references. A page in the database does not by itself establish the film's notability, however.
910:
readily available to most editors of the
English Knowledge. In this case "major film producing country" can be roughly approximated as any country producing 20 or more films in a year, according to
939:
and is currently in production, as evidenced by activities analogous to live-action filming, such as recording of final voice-over tracks by credited voice actors, recording of final music and
460:
A topic related to film may not meet the criteria of the general notability guideline, but significant coverage is not always possible to find on the
Internet, especially for older films.
874:
Award, or Palme D'or, Camera D'or, or Grand Prix from Cannes would certainly be included. Many major festivals such as Venice or Berlin should be expected to fit our standard as well.
773:
When seeking out references to establish the notability of a film, and to provide the necessary information for a thorough article of high quality, consider some of these resources:
935:, and rough animations also known as "reels"), and such events do not fulfill the requirements of this guideline. Instead, this guideline attempts to ensure that the film has been
492:
The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.
190:
391:). If sources publish materials only online, then their publication process and/or the authority of the author should be scrutinized carefully. Note should be taken that
562:
An article on the film should be created only if there is enough information on it that it would clutter up the biography page of that person if it was mentioned there.
647:
Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless
236:
241:
267:
966:
147:
956:
171:
703:
If a film character was adapted from another medium or work, and the original incarnation of the character already has an article, a new article should
961:
799:
catalogues of their own film lineups; a film can screen at a major film festival and still not attain sufficient notability to qualify for an article.
791:
Films which premiere at certain major film festivals (e.g. Toronto, Cannes, Berlin, Sundance, Telluride) will very likely see reviews in significant
981:
60:
585:
911:
656:
342:
314:
308:
768:
730:
This interpretation of the character has made three or more non-cameo appearances, including one in a lead or titular capacity. For example:
668:
795:-worthy publications within the next few days. A film's notability must not, however, depend on sourcing it to the film festivals' own
819:
731:
76:
260:
140:
407:. Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "
183:
35:
927:-production process are usually geared towards pitching the idea of the film by previewing the final product (for instance,
467:
for easily identifying films that
Knowledge should probably have articles about. In almost all cases, a thorough search for
853:
413:
556:
468:
318:
202:
197:
159:
809:
178:
154:
253:
231:
42:
578:
548:
209:
68:
31:
555:
The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a
495:
The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release.
226:
640:
process, meaning that the final animation frames are actively being drawn or rendered, and final recordings of
785:
756:
720:
589:
483:
The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.
424:
621:
543:
489:
Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.
962:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 9#Please lend your voice to notability guideline discussions!
509:
The film is "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.
130:
123:
116:
900:
a unique accomplishment such as "Only film where seven women in an elevator carry yellow handbags."
498:
The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.
419:
327:
940:
675:
636:
In the case of animated films, reliable sources must confirm that the film is clearly out of the
599:
519:
436:
388:
354:
290:
85:
72:
568:
produced, and if any document can be found to support this, in any language, it should be cited.
411:", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as
796:
476:
17:
932:
861:
814:
593:
751:
of the original incarnation's article. Please also note that some franchises, such as the
748:
697:
313:
The general notability guideline states: "If a topic has received significant coverage in
659:
should not have their own articles, unless their failure was notable per the guidelines.
887:
for one example. Any nation with a comparable archive would equally meet our standards.
707:
be created for the adptated version unless one of the following criteria has been met:
637:
464:
408:
392:
348:
975:
957:
Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive AQ#Film
Notability, and Notability in general
792:
752:
693:
333:
Additional criteria for the evaluation of films are outlined in the sections below.
716:
617:
936:
744:
652:
503:
The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
486:
The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:
928:
849:
648:
641:
30:"WP:NF" redirects here. For Knowledge's policy regarding non-free media, see
914:. Defining a "major studio" is highly dependent on the country in question.
577:"WP:NFF" redirects here. For Knowledge's policy about non-free files, see
475:
The following are attributes that generally indicate, when supported with
857:
330:
may still determine that it does not qualify as a stand-alone article.
759:, have franchise-specific criteria which expand on this guideline.
784:
Film and entertainment periodicals abound. Many magazines in
47:
692:
Film character articles should follow the recommendations at
506:
The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.
896:
This should not be too widely construed, as any film could
743:
relevant WikiProject talk pages to ensure the character is
788:
can provide good references and indicators of notability.
669:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (films) § Character articles
71:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
778:
683:
607:
573:
Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films
527:
451:
444:
362:
298:
100:
93:
41:"WP:MOVIE" redirects here. You may also be looking for
943:, and drawing or rendering of final animation frames.
403:
To presume notability, reliable sources should have
655:. Similarly, films produced in the past which were
34:. For the guideline regarding fictional works, see
711:This interpretation of the character has received
479:, that the required sources are likely to exist:
261:
8:
559:person and is a major part of their career.
967:Knowledge:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film
67:Editors should generally follow it, though
667:For the naming conventions guideline, see
268:
254:
112:
546:feature film ever made in Thailand" (See
469:independent, third-party reliable sources
59:This page documents an English Knowledge
885:The United States National Film Registry
27:Knowledge policy for notability of films
831:
657:either not completed or not distributed
586:Knowledge:WikiProject Film/Future films
218:
129:
122:
115:
616:Films that have not been confirmed by
463:These criteria below are presented as
343:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources
309:Knowledge:General notability guideline
769:Knowledge:WikiProject Films/Resources
7:
753:Marvel Cinematic Universe task force
923:Common steps in the animated film
75:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
820:Knowledge:Notability (television)
51:
982:Knowledge notability guidelines
862:1999 Village Voice Critics Poll
36:Knowledge:Notability (fiction)
1:
815:Knowledge:Notability (actors)
715:coverage and commentary from
18:Knowledge:Notability (movies)
858:Time Out Centenary of Cinema
854:AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies
810:Knowledge:Notability (media)
431:Other evidence of notability
414:Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide
397:considered a reliable source
124:General notability guideline
848:Examples would include the
779:The Internet Movie Database
242:Why was my article deleted?
191:Organizations and companies
131:Subject-specific guidelines
43:Knowledge:WikiProject Films
998:
766:
673:
666:
644:and music have commenced.
597:
583:
579:Knowledge:Non-free content
576:
549:The Adventure of Sudsakorn
517:
434:
352:
346:
340:
306:
288:
83:
77:this guideline's talk page
40:
32:Knowledge:Non-free content
29:
933:scratch voice-over tracks
237:Common deletion outcomes
786:Category:Film magazines
590:Knowledge:Planned films
425:Internet Movie Database
399:for proving notability.
326:of the criteria, group
864:, Positif's poll, etc.
777:A film's entry in the
700:before being created.
653:notability guidelines
649:the production itself
622:principal photography
584:Further information:
514:Inclusionary criteria
912:the report by UNESCO
850:Sight and Sound Poll
633:shooting has begun.
405:significant coverage
148:Astronomical objects
61:notability guideline
941:foley sound effects
651:is notable per the
420:Time Out Film Guide
203:Sports and athletes
172:Geographic features
663:Character articles
620:to have commenced
285:General principles
278:
277:
232:Guide to deletion
227:Notability essays
111:
110:
16:(Redirected from
989:
951:Relevant debates
944:
921:
915:
907:
901:
894:
888:
881:
875:
871:
865:
846:
840:
836:
757:WP:MCUCHARACTERS
717:reliable sources
686:
618:reliable sources
610:
530:
477:reliable sources
454:
447:
365:
337:Reliable sources
315:reliable sources
301:
270:
263:
256:
113:
103:
96:
55:
54:
48:
21:
997:
996:
992:
991:
990:
988:
987:
986:
972:
971:
953:
948:
947:
922:
918:
908:
904:
895:
891:
882:
878:
872:
868:
847:
843:
837:
833:
828:
806:
771:
765:
723:The Dark Knight
719:. For example:
690:
689:
682:
678:
672:
665:
614:
613:
606:
602:
596:
582:
575:
534:
533:
526:
522:
516:
458:
457:
450:
443:
439:
433:
409:capsule reviews
369:
368:
361:
357:
351:
345:
339:
311:
305:
304:
297:
293:
287:
274:
214:
107:
106:
99:
92:
88:
80:
52:
46:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
995:
993:
985:
984:
974:
973:
970:
969:
964:
959:
952:
949:
946:
945:
916:
902:
889:
876:
866:
841:
830:
829:
827:
824:
823:
822:
817:
812:
805:
802:
801:
800:
797:self-published
789:
782:
764:
761:
740:
739:
728:
714:
706:
688:
687:
679:
674:
664:
661:
638:pre-production
612:
611:
603:
598:
574:
571:
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
553:
532:
531:
523:
518:
515:
512:
511:
510:
507:
504:
501:
500:
499:
496:
493:
490:
484:
465:rules of thumb
456:
455:
448:
440:
435:
432:
429:
401:
400:
381:
367:
366:
358:
353:
349:Knowledge:IMDb
338:
335:
303:
302:
294:
289:
286:
283:
276:
275:
273:
272:
265:
258:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
239:
234:
229:
221:
220:
216:
215:
213:
212:
206:
205:
200:
194:
193:
187:
186:
181:
175:
174:
168:
167:
162:
157:
151:
150:
144:
143:
137:
134:
133:
127:
126:
120:
119:
109:
108:
105:
104:
97:
89:
84:
81:
66:
65:
56:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
994:
983:
980:
979:
977:
968:
965:
963:
960:
958:
955:
954:
950:
942:
938:
937:green-lighted
934:
930:
926:
920:
917:
913:
906:
903:
899:
893:
890:
886:
880:
877:
870:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
845:
842:
835:
832:
825:
821:
818:
816:
813:
811:
808:
807:
803:
798:
794:
790:
787:
783:
780:
776:
775:
774:
770:
762:
760:
758:
754:
750:
747:to justify a
746:
737:
735:
732:Bruce Wayne (
729:
726:
724:
718:
712:
710:
709:
708:
704:
701:
699:
695:
685:
681:
680:
677:
670:
662:
660:
658:
654:
650:
645:
643:
639:
634:
632:
627:
623:
619:
609:
605:
604:
601:
595:
591:
587:
580:
572:
566:
561:
560:
558:
554:
551:
550:
545:
540:
539:
538:
529:
525:
524:
521:
513:
508:
505:
502:
497:
494:
491:
488:
487:
485:
482:
481:
480:
478:
473:
470:
466:
461:
453:
449:
446:
442:
441:
438:
430:
428:
426:
422:
421:
416:
415:
410:
406:
398:
396:
390:
385:
382:
378:
377:Independence:
375:
374:
373:
364:
360:
359:
356:
350:
344:
336:
334:
331:
329:
325:
320:
316:
310:
300:
296:
295:
292:
284:
282:
271:
266:
264:
259:
257:
252:
251:
249:
248:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
217:
211:
208:
207:
204:
201:
199:
196:
195:
192:
189:
188:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
173:
170:
169:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
152:
149:
146:
145:
142:
139:
138:
136:
135:
132:
128:
125:
121:
118:
114:
102:
98:
95:
91:
90:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
64:
62:
57:
50:
49:
44:
37:
33:
19:
924:
919:
905:
897:
892:
879:
869:
844:
834:
772:
741:
733:
722:
702:
691:
684:WP:NFILMCHAR
646:
635:
630:
625:
615:
547:
544:cel-animated
535:
474:
462:
459:
418:
412:
404:
402:
394:
384:Reliability:
383:
376:
370:
363:WP:NFSOURCES
332:
323:
312:
279:
164:
58:
929:storyboards
767:Main page:
734:Dark Knight
642:voice-overs
389:WP:NEWSBLOG
341:Main page:
319:independent
307:Main page:
210:Web content
347:See also:
117:Notability
69:exceptions
763:Resources
713:extensive
594:WP:FUTURE
437:Shortcuts
423:, or the
328:consensus
317:that are
141:Academics
86:Shortcuts
73:consensus
976:Category
804:See also
736:trilogy)
698:WP:NFICT
676:Shortcut
600:Shortcut
520:Shortcut
393:IMDb is
355:Shortcut
291:Shortcut
219:See also
94:WP:NFILM
745:notable
721:Joker (
624:should
557:notable
528:WP:NFIC
452:WP:NFOE
184:Numbers
793:WP:GNG
694:WP:GNG
608:WP:NFF
592:, and
445:WP:NFO
299:WP:NFP
198:People
160:Events
898:claim
826:Notes
749:split
631:after
179:Music
165:Films
155:Books
101:WP:NF
883:See
696:and
925:pre
755:'s
705:not
626:not
395:not
324:all
978::
931:,
860:,
856:,
852:,
588:,
427:.
417:,
738:.
727:.
725:)
671:.
581:.
552:)
269:e
262:t
255:v
79:.
63:.
45:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.