Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

53:
We advise that generally you not engage such editors at all, particularly if you're inexpert in the subject and they are. (You can if you think it best in the particular situation.) If it looks to be a one-off bad edit, just revert it. If the editor is more prolific or persistent, move to the next
49:
Never call an editor a "pedophile" or similarly inflammatory term. You may rightfully get in trouble. Instead, use "editor showing a tendency to normalize sex with minors" or something. If engaging such editors avoid all inflammatory terms or rhetoric, it will only backfire on you. NPOV, RS, and
57:
We advise you to write to ArbCom by email (only! -- not publicly here), with a succinct description (such as "We have an editor, , showing a tendency to normalize sex with minors") and provide diffs. Arbcom will handle the matter discretely. (It's best to avoid a public back-and-forth on such a
129:
Welcome. This WikiProject is a group of editors working together on articles about pedophilia, child sexuality, and related issues. We want these to be at the level of the best articles on Knowledge (XXG). Articles must be factual, from a neutral point of view and not censored. Please join
108:. Normalizing sexual relations with any minor below the age of consent (Usually around 16 in most Anglosphere nations), or for that matter any minor at all (up thru age 17 generally) is not welcome here and is reportable, except perhaps when discussing minor-minor sex under 135:
A large portion of our mission is to reduce the spread of misinformation, whether that be caused by vandalism, advocacy, blatant ignorance, or even false good faith. This can include edits on both "side" of the
73:
The great majority of the problem is from editors normalizing sex with minors (some with subtle cleverness, erudition, and sources; you may need to be on your game). But, you might get an
179: 61:
If you don't get satisfaction from ArbCom, or think it's best to work it out here (perhaps if you're unsure if there's really a problem for instance), we recommend that you go
115:
Really the only term you need to know is "editor showing a tendency to normalize sex with minors", and all you need to know is how to email Arbcom and how to copy diffs.
151: 122:
is a founder of this project, and if he is still active, you could ask him discreetly (here; he doesn't use email) for another set of eyes or whatever.
207: 191: 145: 69:) with a bland message, eg "I think we have a problem, please take a look at these diffs" and provide the diffs. 187: 167: 174: 109: 40: 89: 88:" describes an internal state, not an action -- the action is called "child molestation" or " 78: 119: 66: 58:
sensitive, emotionally fraught, and potentially triggering subject if possible, we think.)
62: 201: 105: 17: 92:". And pedophilia refers to attraction -- obligatory attraction, generally -- to 101: 85: 100:, roughly ages 12-16 (or maybe 12-17), is different, and might be called 43:. Some notes on how to handle editors who are problematic in this area: 84:(Terms which you don't usually need to know but FYI, technically " 180:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine/Psychiatry task force
77:-pedophile warrior. If they are not able to write in a 152:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 125:FWIW, here is the original lede for this page: 96:, up thru age 11 more or less. Attraction to 8: 192:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject best practices 186:For more information on WikiProjects, see 39:. Its major role has been taken over by 146:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 7: 157:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch 25: 208:History and society WikiProjects 81:way, they also are not welcome. 1: 50:FRINGE are your friends here. 188:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject 224: 175:Portal:Human sexuality 166:Related projects and 110:Romeo and Juliet laws 65:(not the more public 27:Defunct WikiProject 18:Knowledge (XXG):PAW 90:Child sexual abuse 195: 118:Other questions, 16:(Redirected from 215: 185: 120:User:Herostratus 35:This project is 21: 223: 222: 218: 217: 216: 214: 213: 212: 198: 197: 171: 143: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 221: 219: 211: 210: 200: 199: 183: 182: 177: 170: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159:(this project) 142: 139: 138: 137: 132: 131: 71: 70: 59: 55: 51: 32: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 220: 209: 206: 205: 203: 196: 193: 189: 181: 178: 176: 173: 172: 169: 165: 158: 155: 154: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 140: 134: 133: 128: 127: 126: 123: 121: 116: 113: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 82: 80: 76: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 47: 46: 45: 44: 42: 36: 30: 19: 184: 156: 144: 124: 117: 114: 106:Ephebophilia 97: 93: 83: 74: 72: 38: 34: 33: 31: 29: 168:Wikiportals 102:Hebephilia 141:Parentage 86:pedophile 41:WP:ARBCOM 202:Category 94:children 79:WP:NPOV 37:defunct 136:issue. 98:minors 67:WP:ANI 63:WP:AN 54:step. 190:and 75:anti 130:us. 104:or 204:: 112:. 194:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):PAW
WP:ARBCOM
WP:AN
WP:ANI
WP:NPOV
pedophile
Child sexual abuse
Hebephilia
Ephebophilia
Romeo and Juliet laws
User:Herostratus
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
Wikiportals
Portal:Human sexuality
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine/Psychiatry task force
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject best practices
Category
History and society WikiProjects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.