1005:
interested in exploiting her discomfort. Now, what I read were several statements on DVD reviews that described the pixelated changes as almost unnoticeable and the aforementioned reason being for her protection. However, I did not read any statements in reliable, secondary sources that claimed the studios were censoring the DVD. These statements may have come from fansites or discussion forums, but I can't use those. I get your point about studio censorship, and it is a good point to make. But I'm not sure if it can be made without a secondary source claiming the studio purposely altered the image on the DVD. --
1047:'s article. I had dreams where she was very disappointed in me, and it cemented any idea on my part that I might be a good investigative journalist. I ended up asking her if I could use certain points, and she was gracious enough to tell me what to use what not to use. I have a feeling the hullaballoo about this scene will be primarily young gentlemen affronted that they are not able to pause and use this scene for their own benefit or gratification. --
929:
this before I forget. Also, I think you may want to explicitly mention the significance of the image used in the Plot section in the caption, as opposed to just describing the scene from the film. Not all readers will go to the image description pages to understand the rationale for the image used. Perhaps a reference tag could be attached to the image since it is not in the same area as the supporting content? —
976:
tips to depixelate the area for people only interested in that kind of thing. Censorship is an ongoing topic in society, and this kind of censorship seems unique and important enough to be worth mentioning. I can tell that you're not comfortable with dealing with this as you've avoided mention of it, but remember that you have to remain
983:
For the image, my perspective was that "bright and optimistic" could be misconstrued as just a couple of adjectives instead of an appearance actively pursued in production. You could reword it to something like, "...arrives in Los
Angeles with Irene (Jeanne Bates); Betty is purposely shown as bright
745:
I'm going to go back and re-read all my information to substantiate your points here. I think some of them are valid, but I can't interrupt every sentence to say Sally Q. Movie
Reviewer called Betty bright and hopeful, while John P. Film Critic said Rita was a femme fatale. Particularly when multiple
101:
I've listed this article for peer review because I saw this film a couple weeks ago, became quite obsessed with it, and added more than 30k of information within a week. I'd like to know if what has been added is clear, presents a coherent article, or if there are portions that need to be expanded or
1019:
I didn't mean to say definitely that there were reports that the studio itself wanted to censor it. I'll have to research it more, but I think it was more the general issue of censorship, and maybe people didn't think the director was directly responsible for censoring that part. You're right that
928:
Did you happen to come across any references about the blurring of
Harring's private parts on the DVD? This seemed to be a little controversial in terms of censorship. Just wondering if that was worth adding to the "DVD release" section. I'll have more comments later, but I just wanted to mention
1004:
Hmmm... I'm not uncomfortable with nudity, unless it embarrasses someone in particular. It seems
Harring trusted Lynch to have the full-frontal shot low-lit, which it was, and on the movie screen she was visible for a second. But she did was not comfortable with the image going on the DVD. I'm not
975:
I'm not sure if mentioning the issue of censorship is gratuitous and unnecessary. It seems like people thought the studio was trying to censor nudity, but if Lynch took a stance clarifying that he was trying to help
Harring. This kind of information can't be abused; it's not like we're providing
956:
Regarding the image in the Plot section, were you thinking of a caption similar to: "Bright and optimistic Betty (Naomi Watts) arrives in Los
Angeles; pictured with Irene (Jeanne Bates). Lighting for Betty's character was different for Diane's (also played by Watts)" or something more specific?
530:"Media portrayals ... were ... as open to interpretation" - this itself could be open to interpretation. By which I mean, I would just stick with "Media portrayals of Naomi Watts' and Laura Elena Harring's views of their onscreen relationships were varied and conflicting." Hope that makes sense.
950:
Dang. Yes, I came across that. I didn't want to add it because it seemed gratuitous and unnecessary for the article as a whole. Lynch pixelated
Harring's pubic area because she didn't want it frozen on DVD screenshots all over the world. He respected her privacy and I will, too. I understand
208:
Shortly afterwards, " break in when she does not answer the door." - it may just be me, but that makes it sound to me as if she is in the house refusing to answer the door. I don't know what would be better, maybe something along the lines of "when no one answers the door, they break
1193:"(thinks it) sees everything, has everything under control, even if we (and Betty)" Again, these be square brackets if they're an editorial replacement or insertion of text. It seems more like they're replacements, and I wonder what was the original, and what was wrong with it?
1042:
No, go ahead. This is something that should be very carefully written if you find anything. Kid gloves sort of thing. I have a ball hunting down information except when it comes to invading people's privacy. Then I start to have fits of guilt. This happened when I was writing
1219:
That's all from me. Some of these are my personal opinions, and don't need to be followed, others are MOS, which should. I have this page watchlisted now, but should you have any questions or comments about anything or want me to look over it again, let me know. --
448:
The sentence that begins "Lynch infuses nostalgia throughout the film..." is, to me, a little difficult to understand. And the following sentence is also confusing. Is it contradicting the previous one? Maybe it's just me being stupid. (but bear in mind the stupid
1088:..As promised. I haven't seen the movie, so some of the questions/comments regarding plot might seem silly or unnecessary to include. Instead I'll tried to focus on MOS and style type things, and general language, grammar and punctuation
261:
In the last paragraph of the plot, it says "Adam's opulent house off of
Mulholland Drive". I'm not sure if that's correct English, someone more knowledgeable than me will have to weigh in, but to a non-US ear, "off of" just sounds, well,
191:
The sentence "She is escorted to the sound stage where Adam has declared..." is a little unclear. Why does Betty flee before she can meet Adam? I can't remember myself, so for someone who hasn't seen the film, it might need
1107:"Upon returning to the apartment to open the box, Betty disappears, and Rita unlocks it and it falls to the floor." Disappears how, or to where? The last bit with the "and"s and "it"s reads slightly clump.
691:
nom about when to name these folks and when to call them critics, writers, reviewers, etc. The general consensus was to name them when they're renowned in their field. Otherwise, just mention their roles.
1202:"This voluptuous phantasmagoria ...is" Per MOS above, it should be an ellipsis, with a space on either side. I don't think that just because the quoted text does it wrong, we need to copy the wrongness
1128:
The subsection title, "A "poisonous valentine to
Hollywood"" seems an odd choice. Why is this chosen over all the other critiques, espectially when the prose doesn't actually attribute it to anyone?
1020:
it needs reliable, secondary sources -- I'm sure there's been plenty of nonsense on message boards about that scene. Would you mind if I poked around to see if it really is a big deal or not? —
266:. Which makes me wonder if it's a colloquialism. Obviously if it's considered correct, then it's fine, since the article's written in US-English, but I wouldn't mind someone confirming that.
910:. Adam's house is actually on Mulholland Drive: Camilla gives the address as 6980 Mulholland Drive. The shortcut probably avoids a loop in the road. I've fixed this and some other stuff.
551:
Again - "bright and talented newcomer" - not neutral, unless it is taken from some official description of the character, official press kit or something, in which case, needs citing.
722:"...portrayed by dwarf actor..." - I'm undecided as to whether or not "dwarf" is necessary, given the following sentence, but if it is, could do with being linked to dwarfism.
140:
Should Ann Miller be considered a "star" of the film? If so, she should be in the sentence in the lead that mentions the other stars. If not, shouldn't be in the infobox.
74:
491:"The author, Heather Love, noted..." - the use of the word "noted" doesn't sound 100& neutral, sounds like you're advocating whatever it is they're noting. (See
1131:
I feel that the whole
Interpretations and allusions section should be moved to the critical reception part, as it is all about how movie critics percieved the movie
102:
better explained. This is a particular concern since the subject material is confusing, even to those who have seen the film. I appreciate your assistance. Thanks,
70:
21:
738:"...presents some of Lynch's most logical filmmaking of his career" - says who? I know it is referenced, but I think you need to say whose opinion that is.
55:
592:- Variety. I can't include all of this, and there has to be some give in how the editor translates what has been printed to paraphrase into simplicity.
299:
What about "Adam's house off Mulholland Drive"? That sounds better to me, but I'm not familiar with the US usage of this, so I trust your judgement. --
1151:
Watts' statement of "What am I doing here?" has the closing apostrophies the wrong way round. It should be a single apostrophy, followed by a double.
277:
Mulholland Drive, but I don't know that. I only know that the limo stopped on Mulholland Drive and Camilla escorted Diane up the hill to the party.
47:
654:"She is also is the first character with whom the audience identifies" - again, not exactly clear if these are your words or from the cited source.
746:
reviewers said that same thing. I would annoy the hell out of myself. But let me see what I can do to shore up some of the claims in the article.
1110:"The woman with the red hair investigates the sound, but nothing is there." What sound? Where did she come from? Didn't she vacate the apartment?
147:
Ann Miller is such an entertainment icon that whatever she appears in she is called a star. She portrays a minor character in this film, however.
1176:"Rita … is a classic femme fatale with her dark, strikingly beautiful appearance." Can this be attributed to anyone, otherwise it looks like
1095:
In the paragraph that begins with the diner, is the hitman stealing the book in the diner, or is it a different location/scene in the movie?
1098:"They call Diane Selwyn, but she does not answer." They call the waitress by that name, or they call this Diane Selwyn woman on the phone?
1186:"He's sort of the one character in the film who doesn't know what the going on." Why is "heck" being used to substitute the original?
1148:
Refs should appear in numerical order, Is three references necessary? It's not a controversial statement; I think one would suffice.
326:
The Lynch quote in the box - it would be better with a citation showing exactly where it came from, for the sake of verifiability.
352:
There was casting information. It was filmed in LA about LA, so I'm not sure how interesting that is. I'll add the casting info.
1294:
1113:"I (had) a really strong..." I'm assuming "had" is an editorial addition, in which case it should be in square brackets, per
832:
The fact that Ebert was previously one of Lynch's biggest detractors - is that in the reference? Otherwise, needs a citation.
1267:
63:
1279:
1260:
1064:
1035:
1014:
999:
966:
944:
916:
897:
880:
859:
820:
803:
764:
706:
606:
519:
366:
310:
294:
111:
394:
aren't linked to? I was going to do it myself, but wasn't sure if there was a good reason for leaving them unlinked.
1031:
995:
940:
1092:
The first sentence of the Plot section seems like an opinion, and could do with a reference if one is available
647:"directly oppositional to Betty's bright self-assuredness." - I couldn't tell whose words these are - possibly
245:"They are roused to attend a late night performance..." - roused by what/whom? Did they just randomly wake up?
1145:"Apart from the obvious connection between the titles," Not so obvious to someone outside of America, perhaps
345:
Is there any more information on the production? Filming locations, or casting information, stuff like that?
40:
912:
875:
854:
815:
794:
was a description I paraphrased from. That, and I totally watched the movie, too. I know, mine is OR... --
759:
701:
601:
514:
361:
305:
1187:
688:
17:
780:"Described as "the most original and stunning sequence..." - think you need to say who described it so.
1119:"even a close-frame shot of dog feces in one scene." perhaps could do with an "and" at the beginning
1221:
1082:
434:"Mulholland Drive has been compared with Billy Wilder's film noir classic" - who has compared them?
1183:"However, although she is portrayed as weak..." is another conjunction used to start a sentence
888:
Thanks againk, BelovedFreak. I'll give you a holler when I think I've addressed your points.--
870:
849:
810:
754:
696:
596:
509:
356:
300:
120:
1212:
1275:
1060:
1052:
1010:
962:
893:
799:
492:
290:
107:
951:
Knowledge is not censored, but I won't add it, and I think it would cheapen the article.
175:
theater".) These, unsourced, come across as your opinion, and probably aren't necessary.
1027:
991:
977:
936:
783:"The song vividly and tragically serenades the lovers Betty and Rita..." - sounds like
1199:"Best Picture by the New York Film Critics Circle" ref should appear after punctuation
844:
It's a pity you had to lose this. I had a look on google but couldn't see any obvious
1288:
1162:
1123:
1114:
1177:
845:
784:
749:
That's fine, I think you're right really, was just trying to find every point that
674:
648:
558:
281:
Mulholland Drive sounds odd, too. It's not incorrect to say a house or building is
869:
That's it. A great article about a complicated film. Hope this is of some help. --
568:
It does, but it's not. The following are what I found from the following sources:
1104:
How do they get Diane's address, when all Rita can remember is the woman's name?
329:
I would consider linking "story arc" - may be an unfamiliar term to many people.
1122:
Jonathan Ross should be Wikilinked, Phillip French is with one L, according to
1271:
1056:
1048:
1044:
1006:
958:
889:
795:
286:
103:
1021:
985:
930:
922:
1170:"But it is Betty's identity,..." Don't start a sentence with a conjunction
1167:
Refs , again, is three necessary? If so they should be in numerical order
508:
I know, I hate that... hard not to end up with "said...said...said..." --
229:
is maybe redundant. Could just be "the two women make love that night."
1205:
I think the columns of both Awards tables should be of the same width.
159:
The first thing that sticks out is some of the adjectives used (eg. "
1196:"(from the wreck)" seems to be an insertion so needs square brackets
578:"cheerful puzzlement and pluck", "plastic newcomer to big-city ways"
475:"Just as Lynch's skill in diversion and illusion..." is not neutral.
285:
a certain street. That can mean it is a block or so away. --
225:"the two women, having grown close, make love that night" -
1173:
Refs , and , Again, should be placed in numerical order
1208:
Who did Lynch share the Canne Film Festival award with?
582:"bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, a plucky girl detective"
89:
82:
51:
673:"...seems to have ridden the coattails of Camilla" -
1266:Ah, hmmm. Ok. The format completely threw me, so I
505:Pretty soon, there will be no more verbs to use...
680:"She is considered to be..." - considered by whom?
557:"Nervous but plucky..." - same thing, sounds like
984:and optimistic..." something along these lines. —
1101:Why does Betty flee before she can meet Adam?
8:
554:"...is described as..." - described by whom?
98:This peer review discussion has been closed.
1215:to all, including those with poor eyesight
1211:Don't use small text. Knowledge should be
171:Hollywood director"... later on there is "
980:in your shaping of the article's content.
586:"bushy-tailed, almost painfully chipper"
441:Multiple reviewers. I have to find them.
1161:All the ... should be an ellipsis, per
7:
572:- Graham Fuller (Babes in Babylon),
273:Hmm. Well, I could say it's located
1138:wrote..." rather someone from the
622:"Classic femme fatale" - who says?
28:
792:"reduces the new lovers to tears"
661:Not my ideas, but Todd McGowan's.
634:Graham Fuller (Babes in Babylon)
590:"almost comically cheery blonde"
1115:WP:MOS#Brackets and parentheses
1:
377:Interpretations and allusions
1055:) 18:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
131:Ok, here are my thoughts...
1158:have an article to link to?
1311:
1280:02:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
1261:01:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
1065:18:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1036:18:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1015:17:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
1000:17:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
967:17:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
945:17:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
917:20:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
898:22:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
881:21:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
860:10:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
821:10:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
804:00:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
765:10:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
707:10:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
607:10:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
520:22:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
367:22:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
311:22:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
295:22:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
112:15:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
1188:Knowledge is not censored
410:A poisonous valentine...
382:Is there any reason why
687:I also had issues with
570:"relentlessly cheerful"
32:Mulholland Drive (film)
22:Mulholland Drive (film)
640:- see above statement.
1295:May 2008 peer reviews
163:dark haired woman", "
18:Knowledge:Peer review
167:aspiring actress", "
1083:User:Matthewedwards
1136:The New York Times
827:Critical reception
355:Hmm, good point.--
321:Production history
227:having grown close
1258:
1253:
595:Ok, fair point.--
90:Watch peer review
1302:
1256:
1222:
1024:
988:
933:
878:
873:
857:
852:
818:
813:
762:
757:
753:be challenged.--
704:
699:
604:
599:
584:- Roger Ebert,
576:- Heather Love,
517:
512:
470:Romantic content
418:- needs linking?
364:
359:
308:
303:
127:Issues resolved.
87:
78:
59:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1285:
1284:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1163:WP:MOS#Ellipses
1022:
986:
931:
926:
905:
904:
876:
871:
855:
850:
816:
811:
760:
755:
702:
697:
602:
597:
574:"young hopeful"
515:
510:
362:
357:
306:
301:
128:
124:
93:
68:
45:
39:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1308:
1306:
1298:
1297:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1268:responded here
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1217:
1216:
1209:
1206:
1203:
1200:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1184:
1181:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1159:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1120:
1117:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1086:
1085:
1081:Comments from
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
981:
970:
969:
953:
952:
925:
920:
903:
902:
901:
900:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
834:
833:
824:
823:
789:
788:
781:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
740:
739:
735:
734:
733:
732:
724:
723:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
682:
681:
678:
665:
664:
663:
662:
656:
655:
652:
644:
643:
642:
641:
624:
623:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
563:
562:
555:
552:
543:
542:
541:
540:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
497:
496:
488:
487:
486:
485:
477:
476:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:Will rewrite.
451:
450:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:
435:
431:
430:
429:
428:
420:
419:
416:New York Times
407:
406:
405:
404:
396:
395:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
347:
346:
342:
341:
340:
339:
331:
330:
327:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
268:
267:
258:
257:
256:
255:
247:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
231:
230:
222:
221:
220:
219:
211:
210:
205:
204:
203:
202:
194:
193:
192:clarification.
188:
187:
186:
185:
177:
176:
151:
150:
149:
148:
142:
141:
129:
126:
125:
123:
118:
116:
100:
95:
94:
92:
38:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1307:
1296:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1259:
1254:
1252:
1214:
1213:WP:accessible
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1182:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1124:Philip French
1121:
1118:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
982:
979:
974:
973:
972:
971:
968:
964:
960:
955:
954:
949:
948:
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
924:
921:
919:
918:
915:
914:
909:
899:
895:
891:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
879:
874:
861:
858:
853:
847:
843:
842:
841:
838:
837:
836:
835:
831:
830:
829:
828:
822:
819:
814:
808:
807:
806:
805:
801:
797:
793:
786:
782:
779:
778:
777:
776:
766:
763:
758:
752:
748:
747:
744:
743:
742:
741:
737:
736:
731:
728:
727:
726:
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
708:
705:
700:
694:
693:
690:
686:
685:
684:
683:
679:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
660:
659:
658:
657:
653:
650:
646:
645:
639:
635:
631:
628:
627:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
608:
605:
600:
594:
593:
591:
588:- Salon.com,
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
553:
550:
549:
548:
547:
539:
536:
535:
534:
533:
529:
528:
521:
518:
513:
507:
506:
504:
501:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
489:
484:
481:
480:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
461:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
452:
447:
446:
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
432:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:
414:
413:
412:
411:
403:
400:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
368:
365:
360:
354:
353:
351:
350:
349:
348:
344:
343:
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
328:
325:
324:
323:
322:
312:
309:
304:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
260:
259:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
243:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
224:
223:
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
207:
206:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
190:
189:
184:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:
156:
155:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
122:
119:
117:
114:
113:
109:
105:
99:
91:
86:
85:
81:
76:
72:
67:
66:
62:
57:
53:
49:
44:
43:
37:
36:
33:
30:
23:
19:
1255:
1223:
1218:
1155:
1139:
1135:
1087:
927:
913:Geometry guy
911:
907:
906:
868:
839:
826:
825:
791:
790:
774:
773:
750:
729:
716:
715:
668:Diane Selwyn
667:
666:
637:
633:
629:
616:
615:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
545:
544:
537:
502:
482:
469:
468:
459:
425:
415:
409:
408:
401:
391:
387:
384:The Guardian
383:
376:
375:
336:
320:
319:
282:
278:
274:
263:
252:
236:
226:
216:
199:
182:
172:
168:
164:
160:
153:
152:
134:
133:
130:
121:Belovedfreak
115:
97:
96:
83:
79:
65:Article talk
64:
60:
41:
31:
689:my last FAC
52:visual edit
1045:Ann Bannon
775:Soundtrack
580:- Toles,
546:Betty Elms
848:for it.--
449:readers!)
161:beautiful
1289:Category
1156:Premiere
638:Guthmann
493:WP:AVOID
392:Time Out
20: |
1032:contrib
996:contrib
978:neutral
941:contrib
908:Comment
872:Beloved
851:Beloved
812:Beloved
756:Beloved
698:Beloved
598:Beloved
511:Beloved
388:The Sun
358:Beloved
302:Beloved
135:Infobox
75:history
56:history
42:Article
1142:wrote.
695:Ok. --
630:Lopate
283:off of
165:bright
1272:Moni3
1178:WP:OR
1154:Does
1057:Moni3
1049:Moni3
1007:Moni3
959:Moni3
890:Moni3
877:Freak
856:Freak
846:WP:RS
817:Freak
796:Moni3
785:WP:OR
761:Freak
751:might
717:Style
703:Freak
675:WP:OR
649:WP:OR
603:Freak
559:WP:OR
516:Freak
363:Freak
307:Freak
287:Moni3
264:wrong
173:eerie
169:brash
104:Moni3
84:Watch
16:<
1276:talk
1270:. --
1061:talk
1053:talk
1034:) -
1028:talk
1023:Erik
1011:talk
998:) -
992:talk
987:Erik
963:talk
943:) -
937:talk
932:Erik
923:Erik
894:talk
840:DONE
809::)--
800:talk
730:DONE
617:Rita
538:DONE
503:DONE
483:DONE
460:DONE
426:DONE
402:DONE
390:and
337:DONE
291:talk
279:Near
253:DONE
237:DONE
217:DONE
209:in."
200:DONE
183:DONE
154:Plot
108:talk
71:edit
48:edit
1140:NYT
636:,
1291::
1278:)
1063:)
1030:•
1013:)
994:•
965:)
957:--
939:•
896:)
802:)
632:,
495:).
386:,
293:)
275:on
110:)
88:•
73:|
54:|
50:|
1274:(
1257:@
1250:•
1248:Щ
1246:•
1244:Ə
1242:•
1240:ʰ
1238:•
1236:ṭ
1234:•
1232:Ł
1230:•
1228:α
1226:•
1224:ṃ
1190:.
1180:?
1134:"
1059:(
1051:(
1026:(
1009:(
990:(
961:(
935:(
892:(
798:(
787:.
677:?
651:.
561:.
289:(
106:(
80:·
77:)
69:(
61:·
58:)
46:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.