Knowledge

:Peer review/Paul Goodman/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

1676:: "Fatherless, Jewish, anarchist, homosexual, physically unattractive: none of these elements can separately account for Goodman's psychology of rebellion and failure. But, taken together, they do help to understand why he was in som eway both an outcast and a Don Quixote ... It seems, moreover, that among this variety of factors homosexuality played a leading and determining role, the other factors only adding to and intensifying the homosexual feeling of rejection ... Rejected he was indeed—from, among other places, the University of Chicago, the Manumit School of Progressive Education, and even Black Mountain College, although all three institutions were noted for their liberal or progressive atmospheres. For a long time, too, and for similar motives, Goodman found many doors closed in the New York publishing and literary world." 1718:'The teacher–student relation is almost always erotic', he wrote, and stifling that eroticism inhibited the teacher and damaged the student. For Goodman, perhaps the greatest sin of the modern American education system was its puritanical refusal to realistically confront the sexual development of students, and instead imbue all discoussion of sexuality with anxiety, fear and punishment. Even a wood shop class, he argued, could benefit from honest discussion of sexuality. ... Ignoring or repressing that sexual energy, he once wrote, caused the work to suffer. Given such attitudes, it is not surprising that Goodman was fired from several teaching jobs." 1722:'4' on his scale: primarily homosexual, but with more than incidental heterosexual experiences. ... But he also described feeling genuine attraction to women at times, even if his fundamental drive was towards men. ... By the 1960s, Goodman increasingly used the term ‘queer’ rather than 'bisexual' to describe himself, deliberately casting himself as an outsider and social rebel, not merely someone who had sex with both men and women. ... Somehow, in dozens of books, Goodman mostly ignored women. Goodman’s world is decidedly male, so naturally patriarchal that gender need not even be addressed." 952:, so it may be worth mentioning that I'm reading this article as someone with a fair bit of knowledge of anarchist theory and radical history which might shape my perceptions and interests. In all, I think the article's in very good shape and didn't find any noticeable gaps or errors or identify any vitally necessary changes. There's much here that I didn't previously know about Goodman, and virtually everything's exceedingly clearly written and presented. I've 1624:
reusing the terms of the period in the absence of corroborating information about the detail on those specific relations that led to his firings, or (2) the more specific meaning same-sex relationships—and not his bisexuality in general—led to his firings. The latter is more plausible, having seen most of Goodman's oeuvre, noting that his writings on sexuality are almost exclusively about men and, more specifically, young men. His diaries (
154: 852:"Goodman's idiosyncratic celebrity ..." is a tough sentence to get through. Part of it is the vagueness of "idiosyncratic celebrity" and part of it is "physical presence" often being use as a term to comment on someone's stature. I'd maybe start with "while known for" and end with a clear statement about what these characteristics had on his legacy. 619:"which evolved throughout his life" is a bit unclear. I think what's meant here (based on the following sentences) is that Goodman's views on psychology and his favorite schools of psychological thought evolved, leading his radicalism to evolve as well. Other potential readings are possible. Clarity needed. 1806:
I'm still on team "bisexual", with any explanation needed in a footnote. My main problem with "homosexuality or bisexuality" is that readers are likely to read this as a statement of uncertainty, instead of a statement on differing word choices in the sources. If our goal is to capture the variety of
1769:
Thanks for the thoughtful response on this. Given all of the above I definitely don't object to the current wording. My only question is whether it might be worth incorporating a brief explanation of this into the article as an explanatory footnote? I appreciate it might be difficult to avoid OR, but
1659:
Stoehr 1994b, p. 511: "offered an assistantship at the University of Chicago ... He was also married and had his first child. But Goodman was bisexual, and he continued to cruise the parks and bars for young men. Although his wife did not object, university officials finally did. He was fired when he
171:
PG was a major public figure in the 1960s with dizzying breadth across varied and many disciplines. It's likely the challenge that sunk more than two biographies that were in development in the late 20th century. This article is now the best resource on the Internet on his life, and I'd like to make
1792:
I would be remiss if I didn't add, more directly, the subtext that these period sources are conflating his non-heteronormativity with the ethics of his sexual relations with students. Today we'd separate the two and label the latter as inherently predatory. The difficulty is that the extant sources
1623:
But in terms of the green text, on why he was fired from jobs, I have yet to see an exposé on the nature of the relationships that led to his terminations, but it is more often described in relation to homosexuality than bisexuality. That could mean one of two things: (1) today's sources are simply
804:
I have a weak stylistic opposition to footnote numbers in the middle of sentences unanchored to punctuation marks. I'm happy to ignore the mild distaste when something controversial or opinionated needs immediate inline citation, and rewriting to segment that part off would be inapt or inexpedient.
316:
Goodman's writing on city planning often touched on a thematic need for urban–rural integration. The line about frontier culture I think is more in relation to his agreement with Jefferson's romanticization of the yeoman farmer. While Goodman grew up in, preferred, and identified with New York City
290:
more than his life as a model for classical or contemporary anarchists (same goes for other late 19th century figures in anarchism, some of whom are cited for their views but were also antisemites and misogynists). Goodman has only been covered marginally as an intellectual in the last 25 years, so
1721:
On his general sexuality: " lust for men was a central preoccupation of his life. It is difficult to find any contemporary American intellectual who so freely, proudly and publicly boasted of his same-sex affairs (aside from Allen Ginsberg, perhaps). ... Kinsey would probably have ranked Goodman a
1663:
Smith 2001, p. 179: "finished a dissertation at Chicago but was forced to leave the university on grounds of 'nonconfirmist sexual behavior', a charge that would again be leveled and cost him a teaching position a decade later at Black Mountain College", "Partisan Review ceased publishing Goodman,
591:
It's a little complicated to explain in that space, so better to link to the separate article, I think. The article has a few places where Goodman talks about doing things with a useful end in mind, so even if it isn't directly invoked as "this is Deweyan pragmatism", the reader will still get the
1741:
Kostelanetz 1969, p. 286: "Monogamous at home, he cultivates girl friends on the outside; and in his conversation he often speaks fondly of men he has known, explaining, 'Ever since I was twelve, I have been bisexual. My desperate efforts at homosexual satisfaction have given me some beautiful
197:
This PR has been open for a month, but hasn't generated comments yet. Are you still interested in receiving comments? I suggest that you post a request on Wikiproject talk pages, and ask experienced editors in this topic area to comment. I also suggest that you continue reviewing articles at
689:
Of all the sections, §Reception and influence appears to be the most ripe for expansion. Perhaps its length is a reflection of the weight the sources give to praise, criticism, competing views, etc., but I'd be surprised to learn that there were no more content to glean from the existing
670:
I enjoyed reading this article a lot. I came in knowing nothing about Goodman and finished a reading feeling like I have a solid summary of his life and career and plenty of follow-up questions that I could hopefully answer by following links or digging into the abundant sources.
1608:
than it is today (i.e., to same-sex desire rather than all non-heteronormativity). Throughout the essay, he identifies far more often with his same-sex desire and relationships, yet does make that aforementioned sole reference to bisexuality and another once to women lovers.
1592:
part a little more. Yes, it's simpler to just say "bisexuality" but that isn't quite how it's covered in the sources. While his orientation can (and has) been summarized as bisexual, the acts that had him fired appear related more to same-sex interactions in specific.
1345:
to Goodman and Ward's book on his influences has a chapter on Goodman. But based on my recollection, their little interaction was more epistolary and well before Goodman's 1967 trip. Did you find something about Goodman's specific impact on UK anarchism?
414:
Two sources in the References section, Kostelanetz and Roszak, don't have any citations pointing toward them. Perhaps they are being used, invisibly, as general references. If not, they should probably either be mined for content or moved to Further
475:
Overall organization, sectioning, and length looks good. "Thought" is new to me as a section heading. Not a problem, but perhaps there's an equivalent title that similar articles use? Consistency is not worth all that much, but it's something.
1742:
experiences and friendships, but much more frustration and unhappiness.' One friend adds, a bit peevishly, 'Paul tries to keep a girl friend, a boy friend, and a wife; but rarely does he manage to have all three and then keep everyone happy."
1359:
Nothing specific (from what I recall), just something that occurred to me when reading. Looking again, it seems as though the most noteworthy aspect of his time in London may have been his attendance, along with a host of big names, at the
1063:– the relevance of the FSM isn't entirely clear here, as this comes a couple of paragraphs before Goodman's own connection to the FSM is introduced. Without knowledge of that connection it feels like an interesting but tangential detail. 1429:
I'd lean towards including Cornell, as it touches on Goodman at various stages in his life and also helps to place him in a broader context of mid-century U.S. anarchism. But keeping the list a sensible size is important too of course.
421:
Might be a matter of taste—personally, I've rarely seen it done this way and the template documentation doesn't necessitate it. In this case, for example, it's unclear what the reader gains from seeing the year the episode was filmed.
578:
maybe dashes around "not freedom" instead of commas? In the current construction, it's possible (and not too immediately contradictory) to parse "that human ability to pursue one's own initiative and follow through" as referring to
291:
there's comparably little contemporary academic discourse reappraising his social/political thought in light of identity politics. (There is at least some coverage with respect to his treatment of women in his lifetime and in
372:
This has been open since January, and it has been over a month since the last comment. Are you still interested in receiving feedback? If so, I recommend that you ask editors to comment or post on relevant Wikiproject pages.
1034:– pedantry but this may not be quite right, as university presses are generally considered independent entities (even if not formally independent) and universities themselves do sometimes publish reports and the like 1324:
purely curiosity: was Goodman connected to the British anarchist movement when in London, and if so is there a connection to the mid-century UK anarchist tradition worth mentioning in passing? Goodman's influence on
1210:+1 for just "bisexuality"; looking a the context of the statement in question, and considering the sourcing and facts regarding Goodman himself, this definitely seems like the most natural and accurate wording. 247:
Is "Jeffersonian anarchism" really a thing? Jefferson supported small government, but he also owned slaves. Even without slavery, how is plantation agriculture consistent with Goodman's ideas about individual
332:"While Goodman grew up in, preferred, and identified with New York City in particular, he did frequently speak about the merits of rural life." <- If this can be sourced, I think it would help clarify. ( 649:
The trouble with Goodman is that everything influences everything (he says he only speaks and writes about "one subject"—the human and its environment) so it's a veritable ouroboros of which comes first
909:! Made a bunch of adjustments and left some comments where I didn't. If you have time, I would love your FFFeedback when I finish with these current expansions, whether in this peer review or the next. 646:
It's mentioned a few times that Goodman's politics are influenced by his approaches to and experiences with psychology. Perhaps the Pyschology section should come before Politics and social thought?
1186:– given he was apparently definitely bi, shouldn't this just be "bisexuality"? (I appreciate the language of the time would've used "homosexual behaviour" and the like, but we needn't do the same) 310: 1449:
That's all, I think. Don't feel obliged to respond on every point of course. Again, I think the article's in decidedly good shape and there's not much that needs to be changed here at all. –
1596:
Goodman was uncommonly out for the first half of the 20th century. He wrote very overtly about himself and his sexuality throughout his life but his most famous writing on his sexuality is "
418:
External audio and video boxes should include info on place/date of publication, either in the box or in a footnote. I don't have a PAG to point to but it seems like it'd be an improvement.
1604:
largely as "being queer" and having "homosexual needs", with one mention of having a "bisexual life". This essay is partially credited with reclaiming the word "queer", which was defined
805:
Some of the cases in this article don't meet those (personal, arbitrary?) criteria. Ain't no law against it, I'm saying, but I'm sharing my thoughts in case they stir something in you.
1656:, p. 14: "1943–1944: Taught at a progressive boarding school, Manumit; dismissed for homosexual behavior" , "1951: ... "Taught at Black Mountain College; dropped for bisexual behavior" 812:. Sourcing this article is already a beast and it becomes impossible to add to the middle of a paragraph if it's immediately unclear where each piece of text can be verified. :) 241:
Goodman supported American frontier culture, which was only possible because of massive state violence and dispossession of Native Americans. Did Goodman engage with this at all?
1138:. Inn our instance, it's lowercase in the source and in the dictionary so I'd argue that it depends on the context. Let's see if someone wants to make a strong counterargument? 693:
More images would be good. A non-free lead image suggests that copy-free images of Goodman himself are unlikely or hard to find, but maybe some other thinkers or places?
588:
If the way America misappropriates "John Dewey's pragmatism" can be briefly explained, it'd be an improvement. I'd leave it as is if only a lengthy treatment would do.
1382:
As fate would have it, after finding the Loftin article last night and upon reading other articles in the journal's Goodman symposium, I happened right into this
202:, as it will build goodwill among the editors there and will make it more likely that an editor will review your article when you nominate this to FAC. Thanks. 1011:– can the description be a bit more specific here, or be dispensed with? "academic book" could refer to any number of formats across any number of disciplines 716:
Some short terms are in quote marks and it's unclear why. I'll bring them up in section comments if you don't take a whole pass through before I get to them.
1180:– not wholly clear to me: does this mean confusing experiences for feelings (and vice versa), or a state of confusion encompassing both, or something else? 76: 438:
does say "it is essential that the source page be linked too with the date of retrieval", and additional reference info seems like an improvement to me.
309:). I don't believe Goodman or his critics commented in specific relation to Jefferson's plantation agriculture or Native American dispossession, though 301:(earlier; "Anarchists are simply unterrified Jeffsonian Democrats"). Google Books has some on that and Jeffersonian libertarianism (which as a term was 1816: 1279: 1199: 1121: 931: 891: 839: 776: 530: 447: 297:
but next to nothing on race.) But back to "Jeffersonian anarchism", there is some history of the phrase dating back to both Goodman (mid-century) and
510:
is not placed in the most specific category it belongs to. Once that's properly placed, some categories for the article should likely be removed per
540:
Thank you! And feel free to edit directly—it's much easier to follow edits and their edit summaries than to write out the minutiae in a review.
1683:: "I have been fired three times because of my queer behavior or my claim to the right of it, and these are the only times I have been fired. " 1416:
No particular reason, but I have hundreds of Goodman sources in my citation manager so just trying to use the best ones and keep it manageable
317:
in particular, he did frequently speak about the merits of rural life. Any suggestions on how that might be clarified, if unclear and useful?
126: 1413:. These both seem like they might be useful additions to the further reading in this article. Are they ommitted for any particular reason? 994:
feels a bit vague and/or misplaced to me. Maybe something more like "came to feel a strong affinity for Manhattan", if that's what's meant?
1025: 1770:
a paraphrase of the second quotation from Loftin, for example, would do a lot to avoid any possible confusion. (Interested to know what
1839: 122: 1646:
is known to be a thinly fictionalized account of one of these dismissals, and it's about his same-sex relations with his students.
1361: 830:
Another read-through and more section analyses to come. Feel free to ping me if I drop off your radar for more than 48 hours or so.
727:
fixes. Some duplicate links are perhaps intentional, but I remember seeing (an not making a not of) at least one that was unneeded.
1151:
The other option would just be to use numbers in full – "1940s", "1960s" – but I don't think it's worth worrying too much about. –
107: 223:, thank you and yes, I'm comfortable leaving it open since this topic area is not exactly flush with editors and peer reviewers 984: 972: 566:
Jeffersonianism: some amount of duplication between here and §Social criticism is warranted, but I think there's a bit too much
69: 313:
did. I imagine the former would be covered more as an intenral inconsistency within Jefferson's own social/political thought.
1405:
Speaking of Honeywell, I see her "Paul Goodman: Finding an Audience for Anarchism in Twentieth-Century America" is cited in
1649:
These are sensitive claims so I'm mindful of making them accurately. Here's how citations currently in the article put it:
1812: 1275: 1195: 1117: 1058: 927: 887: 835: 772: 526: 443: 99: 1517:
It has been over a month since the last comment on this PR. Is this ready to close or are you looking for more comments?
948:
I haven't done one of these in a good while, so apologies in advance for any mishaps or infelicities. I've come here via
855:"waned as quickly as it came": did renown come quickly to Goodman? Is this referring to a rapid increase in renown after 611:
was namechecked" in the last sentence unless "his role as a New York Intellectual cultural figure" was the name checked.
337: 302: 258: 176:, even. Looking for feedback on any blind spots I might be missing before taking it to FAC. Thanks and happy New Year, 1597: 1339:
I haven't heard much about his 1967 teaching appointment in London. I would assume it was minor. Colin Ward dedicated
1300: 1783: 1493: 1454: 1435: 1373: 1156: 62: 1617: 1615: 1613: 1080:
Well it's not a Leninist vanguard so I won't wikilink, but definitely a political vanguard in the lowercase sense
1296: 50: 1108:
these should be written using numbers or capitalised ("Forties," "Sixties"), though the latter looks ugly to me
1102:
Goodman's anarchist politics of the forties had an afterlife influence in the politics of the sixties' New Left.
1069:– probably pedantry, but really we're dealing here with groups who believed themselves to be, or hoped to be, a 1808: 1771: 1580: 1271: 1191: 1113: 923: 905: 883: 831: 768: 522: 521:
That's it for now. Pending any wiki or IRL emergencies I'll do a full read-through in the next 36 hours or so.
439: 286:
Jeffersonian anarchism is more of a descriptive term than a school of thought. Goodman uses it in reference to
1612:
After his death in 1972, texts indeed have described Goodman himself as bisexual, by the current definition:
1600:", from a few years before his death, so it's as close as it gets to his last words on his own sexuality. He 1642:) are perhaps the best examples of this, with those latter books covered in an anthology of gay literature. 435: 1134:—with the leading apostrophe per the MOS—wouldn't work. I disagree with the MOS on this one and think it's 1070: 456:
That part is referring to the citation/reference, not the external media link itself, to my understanding
1680: 1632: 968: 511: 507: 388:
Yes, I am and I've just alerted a bunch of WikiProjects so we'll see what the wind blows in! Thank you.
44: 17: 1820: 1801: 1787: 1779: 1763: 1673: 1576: 1561: 1540: 1526: 1497: 1489: 1479: 1467: 1458: 1450: 1439: 1431: 1424: 1394: 1377: 1369: 1354: 1317: 1283: 1250: 1232: 1203: 1160: 1152: 1146: 1125: 1088: 1045: 935: 917: 895: 870: 843: 820: 793: 780: 738: 704: 682: 658: 636: 600: 548: 534: 499: 464: 451: 430: 396: 382: 348: 327: 269: 231: 211: 184: 1588:, thanks for your reviews! One of the reasons I left this review open is that I wanted to unpack that 1383: 306: 1653: 1229: 764: 988:– can we specify either (roughly) when that wave occurred, when those ancestors migrated, or both? 572:
I don't think the source verifies "the United States grew increasingly violent in the late 1960s".
569:"afterlife influence" is likely to lead readers to believe the influence was after Goodman's death 407:
Hi Czar. I'm new to this process, so I'm very open to nudges if I do something against etiquette.
1334: 622:
italics for id and telos? I'm inclined but am unsure what philosophy articles do most commonly.
1266:" feels awkward to me; maybe "intellectual associated with" or "intellectual to advocate for"? 1704: 1687:
Loftin, Craig M. (2016). "From 'bisexual' to 'queer': the radical sexuality of Paul Goodman".
1626: 1619: 1601: 1341: 293: 115: 1696: 1406: 1306: 1292: 1037:
It's what the source said but yes, good call, you're right that it's the university's press
1024:– is this an accurate description of the book as a whole? I haven't read it but came across 980: 949: 744: 333: 287: 254: 1552:
It's been another month. Is there anything left to address in this PR or can it be closed?
1557: 1522: 1028:
which suggests the summer camp theme features in the title story but not the other stories
1006: 752: 378: 298: 207: 956:
myself – mostly adding links – so will use this just to highlight other smallish issues.
1795: 1793:
make neither normative claims nor any specific elaboration at all on why he was fired.
1775: 1757: 1584: 1534: 1473: 1418: 1388: 1348: 1311: 1244: 1212: 1140: 1082: 1039: 911: 864: 814: 787: 760: 732: 698: 676: 652: 630: 594: 542: 493: 458: 424: 390: 321: 225: 178: 1386:
from the Dialectics of Liberation Congress, though it appears to be just an anecdote.
1833: 962: 809: 517:
Question: if I find uncontroversial copyedits to make, would you mind my making them?
199: 491:), so I think it has to do more with the type of thinking/philosophy to be covered 173: 161: 92: 1700: 1368:), but I don't know whether that figures prominently at all in work on Goodman. – 1074: 1057:", the movement that rose from the participatory and democratic politics of the 1019: 724: 342: 279: 263: 1751:
So for these reasons I'm inclined to say both homosexuality and bisexuality in
1553: 1518: 1365: 1326: 1105: 756: 625: 374: 283:. I think "unexplored contradictions" is a good summation of Goodman's legacy. 219: 203: 1707: 1638: 1547: 1512: 1485: 484: 367: 192: 1488:– a few responses above, and one below, but changes made all look good. – 1054: 488: 1755:, but I am open to your read of this issue and alternative expressions. 1532:
Just have some replies I've been waiting to make and will do so shortly
1260:
the foremost American intellectual for non-Marxist, Western radicalism.
674:
That's so great to hear! In the end, that's what this is all about. :)
480: 1807:
descriptions in the references, a footnote is the best place for it.
1753:
dismissed ... for reasons related to his homosexuality or bisexuality
1590:
dismissed ... for reasons related to his homosexuality or bisexuality
720: 643:
The "Unlike the silent ..." sentence is worth breaking apart into two
1471:! Left some comments and either adjusted or am working on the rest. 922:
You're welcome. A few response above. See you around the talk page.
244:
He was pro-frontier but apparently preferred living in large cities?
1605: 1096:
Goodman died of a heart attack in New Hampshire on August 2, 1972.
983:
ancestors had emigrated to New York from Germany a century before
1000:
feels a bit informal to me, though may be less so in U.S. English
506:
Somewhat beyond the scope of this article: I'm fairly confident
148: 877:
A rough indication of when Stoehr is writing would be helpful
288:
Jefferson's writings/views on decentralization and liberties
1660:
would not promise to keep his amorous pursuits off campus."
1032:
the University of Chicago, which published his dissertation
748: 1098:– is it worth specifying his age at the time of his death? 628:
foreign terms and the like but these are dictionary words
238:
Seems like there are some unexplored contradictions here:
975:
is linked in the body though, so perhaps that covers it)
1135: 953: 141: 134: 103: 559:
Two sections and some broader/misc thoughts to start:
1309:
is a bit of a misnomer but for the other two why not
696:
Yep, no free images apart from writing to his estate
575:"counter-institutions": an example here would be nice 1184:
reasons related to his homosexuality or bisexuality.
305:
prior to the rise of the late-20th century American
1329:, for example, is discussed in Carissa Honeywell's 1178:
the "confusion" of personal experience and feelings
1664:however, when they learned of his bisexuality ..." 719:It'd be great if you could do a pass looking for 1053:Goodman became known as "the philosopher of the 730:If so, I missed it so let me know if you see it 253:I realize sources may not cover these aspects. ( 1073:but in fact were decisively not – so perhaps " 70: 8: 1728: 743:The currently present duplicate links are 585:I'd drop the post-Aristotle "additionally" 77: 63: 32: 1172:Goodman met Fritz Perls around this time. 1018:, stories from his experience working at 1731: 1239: 35: 1752: 1589: 1259: 1183: 1177: 1171: 1131: 1112:Count me in favor of "40s" and "60s." 1101: 1095: 1066: 1052: 1031: 1014: 1003: 997: 991: 978: 971:, here or somewhere else, be useful? ( 960: 7: 582:"first sold out" → "sold out first"? 1132:the politics of the '60s' New Left 24: 1362:Dialectics of Liberation Congress 954:made a handful of smaller changes 1681:in "The Politics of Being Queer" 607:I'd insert a comma and use "and 152: 1136:a longstanding misunderstanding 992:came to identify with Manhattan 973:History of the Jews in New York 1077:groups" captures that better? 1: 1701:10.1080/03060497.2016.1248707 1331:A British Anarchist Tradition 1059:Berkeley Free Speech Movement 232:02:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC) 212:14:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC) 563:Politics and social thought 1821:01:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC) 1802:22:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 1788:12:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1764:22:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 1598:The Politics of Being Queer 1498:12:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1480:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1440:12:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1425:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1395:13:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1378:12:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1355:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1318:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1301:List of American anarchists 1291:Would it be useful to link 1251:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1190:+1 for just "bisexuality". 1161:12:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1147:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1089:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 1046:03:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 961:Born to a Jewish family in 936:01:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC) 918:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 871:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 821:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 794:01:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 781:01:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC) 739:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 705:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 683:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 659:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 637:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 601:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 500:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 465:01:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC) 452:01:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC) 431:02:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 276:Thanks for your questions, 185:20:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC) 1856: 1562:23:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 383:20:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC) 349:17:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC) 328:17:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC) 270:17:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC) 1840:January 2022 peer reviews 1630:) and long-form fiction ( 1335:this article by Honeywell 1297:List of Jewish anarchists 1270:I like "associate with". 985:the Eastern European wave 303:synonymous with anarchism 1541:15:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 1527:15:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 1459:16:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1284:17:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1233:22:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1204:17:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1126:17:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1016:The Break-Up of Our Camp 944:Arms & Hearts review 896:03:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC) 849:Reception and influence 844:01:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC) 549:02:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC) 535:19:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC) 479:I've seen both Thought ( 397:19:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC) 1333:and, it would seem, in 902:Thanks for the review, 436:Template:External media 1071:revolutionary vanguard 808:I'm the opposite, for 1668:Ones I haven't used: 969:Jews in New York City 810:text–source integrity 508:Category:Paul Goodman 410:First skim comments: 164:discussion is closed. 18:Knowledge:Peer review 1733:on general sexuality 1240:§ Sexual orientation 1174:– what time is this? 1067:Radical vanguards... 311:another Paul Goodman 307:libertarian movement 1809:Firefangledfeathers 1772:Firefangledfeathers 1581:Firefangledfeathers 1272:Firefangledfeathers 1192:Firefangledfeathers 1114:Firefangledfeathers 924:Firefangledfeathers 906:Firefangledfeathers 884:Firefangledfeathers 832:Firefangledfeathers 769:Firefangledfeathers 765:Common-law marriage 523:Firefangledfeathers 440:Firefangledfeathers 1689:Self & Society 1570:Sexual orientation 1409:, as is Cornell's 1303:under "see also"? 1004:the academic book 967:– would a link to 483:) and Philosophy ( 1780:Arms & Hearts 1748: 1747: 1679:Goodman himself, 1602:writes of himself 1577:Arms & Hearts 1490:Arms & Hearts 1468:Arms & Hearts 1451:Arms & Hearts 1432:Arms & Hearts 1370:Arms & Hearts 1342:Anarchy in Action 1153:Arms & Hearts 555:FFFeedback part 1 294:Growing Up Absurd 169: 168: 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 1847: 1800: 1798: 1762: 1760: 1729: 1717: 1714:On being fired: 1711: 1672:Parisi 1986, p. 1587: 1551: 1539: 1537: 1516: 1506:Query from Z1720 1478: 1476: 1470: 1423: 1421: 1407:The May Pamphlet 1393: 1391: 1353: 1351: 1316: 1314: 1307:Jewish anarchism 1293:Jewish anarchism 1286: 1262:– "intellectual 1249: 1247: 1235: 1206: 1145: 1143: 1128: 1087: 1085: 1044: 1042: 981:Sephardic Jewish 916: 914: 908: 869: 867: 819: 817: 792: 790: 745:Delmore Schwartz 737: 735: 703: 701: 681: 679: 657: 655: 635: 633: 599: 597: 547: 545: 498: 496: 463: 461: 429: 427: 395: 393: 371: 345: 326: 324: 282: 266: 230: 228: 222: 196: 183: 181: 156: 155: 149: 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1830: 1829: 1796: 1794: 1758: 1756: 1749: 1734: 1715: 1686: 1574: 1572: 1545: 1535: 1533: 1510: 1508: 1474: 1472: 1465: 1419: 1417: 1411:Unruly Equality 1389: 1387: 1349: 1347: 1312: 1310: 1269: 1245: 1243: 1209: 1189: 1141: 1139: 1111: 1083: 1081: 1040: 1038: 946: 912: 910: 903: 865: 863: 815: 813: 788: 786: 753:Free university 733: 731: 699: 697: 677: 675: 653: 651: 631: 629: 610: 595: 593: 557: 543: 541: 494: 492: 459: 457: 425: 423: 405: 391: 389: 365: 343: 322: 320: 299:Benjamin Tucker 277: 264: 226: 224: 217: 190: 179: 177: 153: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1853: 1851: 1843: 1842: 1832: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1778:think too.) – 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1736: 1735: 1732: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1695:(4): 333–338. 1684: 1677: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1207: 1181: 1175: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1099: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1064: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1029: 1012: 1007:Kafka's Prayer 1001: 995: 989: 976: 945: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 881: 880: 879: 878: 875: 874: 873: 853: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 761:Man of letters 717: 713:Smaller stuff 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 691: 687: 686: 685: 667:Broader stuff 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 644: 641: 640: 639: 620: 614: 613: 612: 608: 605: 604: 603: 586: 583: 580: 576: 573: 570: 567: 556: 553: 552: 551: 519: 518: 515: 512:WP:CATSPECIFIC 504: 503: 502: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 416: 404: 401: 400: 399: 363: 362: 361:Query by Z1720 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 318: 314: 284: 251: 250: 249: 245: 242: 236: 235: 234: 167: 166: 157: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1852: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1835: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1754: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1730: 1720: 1713: 1712: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1662: 1658: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1635: 1634: 1629: 1628: 1621: 1620: 1618: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1606:more narrowly 1603: 1599: 1594: 1591: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1569: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1549: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1514: 1505: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1469: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1396: 1392: 1385: 1384:this anecdote 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1344: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1267: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1252: 1248: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1078: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1002: 999: 998:teaching gigs 996: 993: 990: 987: 986: 982: 977: 974: 970: 966: 964: 963:New York City 959: 958: 957: 955: 951: 943: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 920: 919: 915: 907: 901: 900: 899: 897: 893: 889: 885: 876: 872: 868: 861: 860: 858: 854: 851: 850: 848: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 833: 822: 818: 811: 807: 806: 803: 795: 791: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 741: 740: 736: 729: 728: 726: 722: 718: 715: 714: 712: 706: 702: 695: 694: 692: 688: 684: 680: 673: 672: 669: 668: 666: 660: 656: 648: 647: 645: 642: 638: 634: 627: 624: 623: 621: 618: 617: 615: 606: 602: 598: 590: 589: 587: 584: 581: 577: 574: 571: 568: 565: 564: 562: 561: 560: 554: 550: 546: 539: 538: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 516: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 490: 486: 482: 478: 477: 474: 466: 462: 455: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 434: 433: 432: 428: 420: 419: 417: 413: 412: 411: 408: 402: 398: 394: 387: 386: 385: 384: 380: 376: 369: 360: 359: 350: 347: 346: 339: 335: 331: 330: 329: 325: 319: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295: 289: 285: 281: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 268: 267: 260: 256: 252: 246: 243: 240: 239: 237: 233: 229: 221: 215: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 194: 189: 188: 187: 186: 182: 175: 165: 163: 158: 151: 150: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 1750: 1692: 1688: 1667: 1648: 1644:Parents' Day 1643: 1637: 1633:Parents' Day 1631: 1625: 1622: 1611: 1595: 1573: 1509: 1484:Many thanks 1448: 1410: 1366:some footage 1340: 1330: 1263: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1015: 1005: 947: 882: 856: 829: 558: 520: 409: 406: 364: 341: 292: 262: 170: 159: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 28:Paul Goodman 27: 1075:vanguardist 1026:this review 1020:summer camp 725:MOS:DUPLINK 690:references. 626:Usually for 616:Psychology 248:initiative? 162:peer review 104:visual edit 1627:Five Years 1327:Colin Ward 1106:MOS:DECADE 857:Growing Up 757:John Dewey 579:"freedom". 403:FFF review 172:it better— 1776:Snow Rise 1708:0306-0497 1639:Making Do 1585:Snow Rise 485:Kropotkin 1834:Category 1817:contribs 1464:Thanks, 1280:contribs 1200:contribs 1122:contribs 1055:New Left 932:contribs 892:contribs 840:contribs 777:contribs 592:intent. 531:contribs 489:Proudhon 448:contribs 415:reading. 174:featured 1583:, and 1299:and/or 481:Bakunin 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 1654:Widmer 1242:below 1104:– per 763:, and 721:MOS:LQ 344:buidhe 280:Buidhe 265:buidhe 200:WP:FAC 1554:Z1720 1519:Z1720 785:Done 375:Z1720 220:Z1720 204:Z1720 160:This 136:Watch 16:< 1813:talk 1797:czar 1784:talk 1774:and 1759:czar 1705:ISSN 1558:talk 1548:Czar 1536:czar 1523:talk 1513:Czar 1494:talk 1486:Czar 1475:czar 1455:talk 1436:talk 1420:czar 1390:czar 1374:talk 1350:czar 1313:czar 1276:talk 1246:czar 1238:See 1226:Rise 1196:talk 1157:talk 1142:czar 1118:talk 1084:czar 1041:czar 979:His 950:WT:@ 928:talk 913:czar 888:talk 866:czar 862:Yep 836:talk 816:czar 789:czar 773:talk 734:czar 723:and 700:czar 678:czar 654:czar 632:czar 596:czar 544:czar 527:talk 495:czar 460:czar 444:talk 426:czar 392:czar 379:talk 368:Czar 323:czar 227:czar 208:talk 193:Czar 180:czar 123:edit 100:edit 1697:doi 1674:103 1264:for 965:... 216:Hi 1836:: 1819:) 1815:/ 1786:) 1703:. 1693:44 1691:. 1636:, 1579:, 1560:) 1525:) 1496:) 1457:) 1438:) 1430:– 1376:) 1295:, 1282:) 1278:/ 1202:) 1198:/ 1159:) 1124:) 1120:/ 934:) 930:/ 898:. 894:) 890:/ 859:? 842:) 838:/ 779:) 775:/ 767:. 759:, 755:, 751:, 749:Id 747:, 609:he 533:) 529:/ 487:, 450:) 446:/ 381:) 340:) 336:· 261:) 257:· 210:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 1811:( 1782:( 1716:" 1710:. 1699:: 1575:@ 1556:( 1550:: 1546:@ 1521:( 1515:: 1511:@ 1492:( 1466:@ 1453:( 1434:( 1372:( 1364:( 1274:( 1223:w 1220:o 1217:n 1214:S 1194:( 1155:( 1116:( 1061:. 1022:. 926:( 904:@ 886:( 834:( 771:( 525:( 514:. 442:( 377:( 370:: 366:@ 338:c 334:t 278:@ 259:c 255:t 218:@ 206:( 195:: 191:@ 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Paul Goodman
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
peer review
featured
czar
20:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Czar
WP:FAC
Z1720
talk
14:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Z1720
czar
02:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
t
c

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.