Knowledge (XXG)

:Peer review/Satellite cell (glial)/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

211:
As a general item, it's encouraged to include secondary sources such as reviews and book chapters when writing scientific articles on Knowledge (XXG). Secondary sources provide guidance into keeping the article neutral and balanced in choosing which primary research articles to include. Of course,
149:
subst:PR/archive I've listed this article for peer review because I am a student at Boston College currently working on a project for my Neuroscience course. We are trying to improve many of the stub class neuroscience articles. My group worked on the Satellite cell (glial) page. We were hoping to
196:
The "Research directions" section could also be combined into a "Function" section, but be careful with the tone of this section. Statements like "researchers hope to give more time and attention to the SGCs" and "X will likely be explored and definitively characterized" and "Y must also be
192:
The "Physiological role" and "Pharmacological properties" are again on the short side. You might consider combining them as subsections under a larger "Function" section. I'm sure there's also more expansion that could go into this
180:", since this is the term used throughout the article (as an abbreviation), and it's discouraged for articles to have a parenthetical notation unless there's no other way to disambiguate it from some other article. 204:
The External Links section is usually used for links to websites rather than direct links to images, and also there shouldn't be any wikilinks to the school names in the listing, just the link. Per
220:
In all, I can see this is the result of a very substantial effort, and I hope you continue to improve Knowledge (XXG) articles after your assignment is completed.  :-)
126: 122: 76: 107: 150:
get any feedback possible in order to make the article the best it can be! Any comments or suggestions for improvement would be greatly appreciated.
99: 183:
In the hatnote, I'd change "the non-glial progenitor cells" to "the progenitor cells in muscle tissue" or something similarly more specific.
189:
The "Anatomy" section is a bit long and should be split into subsections, similar to how the "Roles in health issues" section is set up.
197:
explored" are subjective statements, and should be attributed as someone's opinion from a specific source. Also keep in mind that
231: 69: 172:
Good job on this article so far! It is very well-referenced, which is an important thing. I have a couple of comments:
50: 115: 44: 236: 162: 158: 62: 17: 92: 213: 186:
The "Location" section is a bit short; it should be expanded or perhaps combined into some other section.
154: 177: 198: 216:
for more exposition, although this policy is not specifically geared towards scientific articles.
221: 205: 201:
and we should be careful about statements on what might happen in the future.
208:, the External Links section should also be after the References section. 141: 134: 103: 212:
notable primary sources should still be cited. See
70: 8: 176:A better title for this article might be " 77: 63: 32: 35: 199:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball 7: 24: 1: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review 252: 237:03:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 163:17:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 28:Satellite cell (glial) 178:Satellite glial cell 168:Antony–22's comments 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 243: 155:LaurenMalishchak 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 251: 250: 246: 245: 244: 242: 241: 240: 234: 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 249: 247: 230: 218: 217: 209: 202: 194: 190: 187: 184: 181: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 248: 239: 238: 233: 228: 227: 226: 215: 210: 207: 203: 200: 195: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 175: 174: 173: 170: 169: 165: 164: 160: 156: 151: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 224: 223: 219: 214:WP:SECONDARY 206:MOS:APPENDIX 171: 167: 166: 152: 148: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 104:visual edit 232:contribs 193:section. 153:Thanks, 222:Antony– 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 136:Watch 16:< 159:talk 123:edit 100:edit 235:) 229:(⁄ 225:22 161:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 157:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
Satellite cell (glial)
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
LaurenMalishchak
talk
17:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Satellite glial cell
Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
MOS:APPENDIX
WP:SECONDARY
Antony–22
contribs
03:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.