35:
315:(!) book covers. There should be one book cover. Book covers must have a fair use rationale, and more than one is really pushing that. I quite like the article itself, although some of the sections could be merged. Do not small-font your notes, it is poor style (font should be a minimum size, particularly for those with vision problems).
97:
use rationale on all images states they are "illustrating how different individuals have visualized
Starship Troopers", but they are spread rather random throughout the article and there is no mentioning of any cover in the article. They certainly are not used to illustrate anything in the sections they are placed in. --
381:
The non-English book covers could be reduced and merged into a single image for the purpose of demonstrating the various languages into which the novel has been translated. Apart from stills from the movie or possibly a pic of
Heinlein, however, I'm not sure what other images you're going to find. —
96:
As has been already pointed out in the FA nomination, there seem to be quite a lot of images of covers of the book in the article and I'm not sure their use qualifies as fair use. It seems to me as if they're used more for decorational purposes than to illustrate the points of the article. The fair
85:
about futuristic warfare from an infantryman's perspective. It helped created a sub genre of literature known as military science fiction and is the only science fiction novel on the reading list at all four United States military academies. However, the novel is extremely controversial, and has
119:
does say we're allowed to use book covers "to illustrate an article discussing the book in question". I should add that I originally used images from the films, anime, and comics, but other users objected to using pictures from non-literary sources. *sigh*. I just can't win this one, can I?
164:
Well, you're definitely right about them cluttering up the article so I've tried spacing them out a bit. I do think they add to the article, because in addition to being visual aids, they give multiple different perceptions of the powered armor (My personal favorite is the
137:
Sure, in general I agree, but the many covers in the article seem excessive and unnecessary. Most of them just jam the article and don't add anything informative to it. And as you brought that up, there's no mentioning of any of the US comic books in the article.
350:
ed in several FA already without problems. Since the technique always involve scalable fonts, the reader is able to jack up the text size (and if he has vision problems, he probably does it by default).
74:
73:
when this page was obviously nowhere near FA status, and consequently received minimal feedback. However this article has improved a lot over the last two months and was recently
77:. Unfortunately, it failed to get enough votes and so I'm coming back to you, hat in my hand, asking for your advice and criticism. For those of you unfamiliar with the topic,
21:
372:
17:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC) I have just swapped two book covers for two other images. The same could be done through the rest of the article.
169:). I still have to rewrite the "Themes" section, so when I finish with that I think I'll redo the footnotes so that they're 'concentrated.'
437:
The main reason this article failed in its FA nomination was a lack of copyediting. Would anyone here be able to help with that?
284:
391:
Good idea. I'm loathe to use anything from the film for two reasons: one, this article is about the novel, not the
70:
42:
200:
fans. I had to create a seperate page for it all called Books, films, and games influenced by
Starship Troopers.
166:
417:
143:
102:
442:
421:
403:
386:
376:
355:
341:
302:
249:
233:
204:
173:
147:
124:
106:
90:
413:
139:
98:
51:
17:
272:
116:
82:
229:. I don't think the list is so long that it can't be boiled down to a section within the page.
280:
192:
OMG! NO WAY! You should have seen this page when I took over. At least 1/3 was taken up by
62:
223:
331:
69:
I have to start this request for a Peer Review with an apology. I made the last request
439:
400:
299:
261:
246:
241:
201:
170:
121:
87:
373:
369:
213:
352:
276:
230:
383:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
316:
86:
been called militaristic, fascist, and even racist by many of its detractors.
268:
Haven't read the article in details yet, but these would be nice to correct.
368:
I have a problem with so many book covers and no other images.
29:
189:
Usually these articles have a list of references in culture.
186:
Several short sections (reception, some of the adaptations).
260:
It'd be nice if identical notes could be concatenated (see
395:"universe"; second a lot of Heinlein fans hated the
412:
to be that many pictures in the article, anyway. --
297:
Will try and tighten up/merge the shorter sections.
240:I'll see what I can do. Thanks for your input.
209:There should at least be a quick section using
8:
311:As Fritz said further above - there are
399:film and might take it personally. ;)
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
75:nominated to be a Featured Article
28:
33:
81:is a science fiction novel by
1:
443:15:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
422:21:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
404:17:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
387:17:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
377:17:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
356:15:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
342:15:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
303:14:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
250:02:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
244:15:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
234:15:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
205:14:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
174:15:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
148:14:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
125:13:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
107:11:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
91:09:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
408:It's not like there really
459:
115:True, but the Knowledge
46:of past discussions.
18:Knowledge:Peer review
264:for how to do this).
262:meta:Cite/Cite.php
117:Template:bookcover
83:Robert A. Heinlein
397:Starship Troopers
393:Starship Troopers
340:
289:
275:comment added by
79:Starship Troopers
63:Starship Troopers
58:
57:
52:current main page
22:Starship Troopers
450:
349:
346:Notes have been
338:
337:
336:
330:
329:
323:
322:
321:
288:
269:
228:
222:
218:
212:
71:back in December
37:
36:
30:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
347:
334:
333:
332:
325:
319:
318:
317:
270:
226:
220:
216:
210:
67:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
446:
445:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
414:Fritz Saalfeld
406:
361:
360:
359:
358:
308:
307:
306:
305:
266:
265:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
167:Polish version
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
150:
140:Fritz Saalfeld
130:
129:
128:
127:
110:
109:
99:Fritz Saalfeld
66:
59:
56:
55:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
444:
441:
438:
435:
434:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
385:
380:
379:
378:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
357:
354:
345:
344:
343:
339:
328:
324:
314:
310:
309:
304:
301:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
263:
259:
251:
248:
245:
243:
237:
236:
235:
232:
225:
215:
208:
207:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:Warhammer 40K
191:
190:
188:
185:
184:
175:
172:
168:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
157:
156:
149:
145:
141:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
126:
123:
118:
114:
113:
112:
111:
108:
104:
100:
95:
94:
93:
92:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
65:
64:
60:
53:
49:
45:
44:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
436:
409:
396:
392:
326:
312:
296:
267:
239:
197:
193:
78:
68:
61:
47:
41:
271:—Preceding
40:This is an
440:Palm_Dogg
401:Palm_Dogg
300:Palm_Dogg
247:Palm_Dogg
242:Palm_Dogg
202:Palm_Dogg
171:Palm_Dogg
122:Palm_Dogg
88:Palm_Dogg
374:SilkTork
370:SilkTork
285:contribs
273:unsigned
20: |
353:Circeus
277:Circeus
231:Circeus
224:details
43:archive
295:Done.
238:Done.
348:small
320:Proto
16:<
418:Talk
410:need
335:type
281:talk
214:main
198:Halo
196:and
144:Talk
103:Talk
384:RJH
219:or
420:)
327:||
313:12
287:)
283:•
227:}}
221:{{
217:}}
211:{{
146:)
138:--
105:)
416:(
279:(
142:(
101:(
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.