398:
I found the the "Romantic
Chronology" source website to be rather flaky (it is built on some rather old technology). There does appear to be some editorial control, though it also appears that "developers" can edit pages directly. The pages don't cite their sources. It strikes me as more of a project
402:
Actually, for a humanities endeavor, this is a very impressive project. The two general editors are at the forefront of
Romantic scholarship (one of the editors also edited a prominent anthology used to teach Romanticism, for example - Wu) and the scholars on the review board are some of the best in
455:
I haven't studied the body in detail, though others are more capable of identifying issues wrt Jane Austin than me! I noticed your talk page discussion about what to include wrt historical context. Don't let the views of one stubborn reviewer mould your article into a form you dislike. Consensus of
370:
The events could be sourced to separate history books, but that would be tedious and unnecessary. I also wanted to make sure that the timeline retained some semblance of coherence - that I wasn't constructing the timelines myself out of thin air. Lynch's site is a good one - it is accessible to
375:). Since the author is an academic, the site is recommended by other academics (and this is not the only site - it is recommended frequently), and it is by far the most comprehensive online timeline that I could find for the eighteenth century, I think it is a good source to use.
310:
The images embedded in the table have no caption (which is fine) but they should have some alt-text (for screen readers and also tooltips). You can supply this by adding "|some text here" to the end of the image spec. (You should really to this for the other literary timelines).
403:
the field. I found this to be the best source available for the timeline - in print or on the web. Timelines like this are not really published anymore. I think that students could definitely cite this timeline. I might also mention that few timelines cite their sources.
456:
wikipedians is what we are after, not acceptance by one or two "important" reviewers. If you can include a number of literary/historical expert wikipedians in that discussion, and come to a consensus prior to FLC, then you can point to it as an already-resolved issue.
426:
Why was "A Chronology of Jane Austen and her Family: 1700-2000" not used as a source? Is it because that author's chapter in "The
Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen." was a condensed version that was adequate for the purposes here? Did you not consult it at all?
399:
than a product if you get what I mean. I'd be happier with a book from a good publisher but... Do you think literary students would get away with using such sources? Are these sites respected or just seen as starting-points for research?
253:
The lead reads well and introduces the subject nicely. However, the third paragraph, on the historical context, ends a bit flat and the last sentence almost seems stuck-on rather than concluding the overview.
117:
A quick gripe - references 11, 16 and 18 don't have page references and surely can't all be from one page each, can they? I think FAC buffs might be a little put off by this.
21:
231:
257:
We are actually working on expanding the text part of the list quite a bit at another reviewer's suggestion, so hopefully that will be fixed as well.
434:
has 15,000 entries - it is not appropriate for this list. Her chapter is much more appropriate. I saw the massive tome - it was 1,000 pages long.
367:— I suspect the "in some circumstances" get-out-clause isn't relevant here as these are historical events that could be alternatively sourced.
363:
Jack Lynch's "Eighteenth-Century
Chronology" is a personal homepage. He may well be a learned professor, but this is still self-published. See
478:
53:
133:
You are right that they are not from the same page, but they are all from the same 3-4 pages. We should indicate that.
463:
444:
413:
385:
350:
324:
297:
267:
243:
207:
192:
176:
157:
143:
126:
111:
371:
people reading on the web and is recommended by the moderators of the primary 18th-century listserv in academia (see
314:
I'm not sure this is necessary. There is so much text already and the timeline indicates what the images are of.
17:
223:
39:
281:
439:
408:
380:
345:
319:
292:
262:
202:
171:
153:
138:
106:
188:
122:
364:
227:
94:
461:
239:
148:
Reference 12 is a similar case. Awadewit, do you have ready access to the cited book?
472:
435:
404:
376:
341:
315:
288:
258:
198:
167:
149:
134:
102:
86:
82:
184:
118:
90:
457:
235:
372:
284:
nicely to run his script to tidy up all the hyphen/ndash inconsistencies.
98:
93:. This is the first in that series. We are planning on taking this to
250:
Just a quick look during my lunch hour... (I've no literary genes).
101:
and non-Janeites in advance for their assistance on this project!
230:
style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
183:
Also - should references 18 and 20 be consolidated into one?
97:, so please critique accordingly. We would like to thank all
166:
I have added page numbers for all of the book chronologies.
226:
review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
69:
65:
61:
57:
49:
45:
337:
The book sources should give the ISBN, if available.
89:have started working on a series of articles about
8:
77:This peer review discussion has been closed.
222:A script has been used to generate a semi-
7:
280:When you've finished polishing, ask
28:
1:
464:13:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
445:04:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
414:04:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
386:04:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
351:23:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
325:23:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
298:04:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
268:23:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
244:04:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
208:00:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
193:12:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
177:17:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
158:17:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
144:17:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
127:12:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
112:18:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
495:
479:February 2008 peer reviews
32:Timeline of Jane Austen
22:Timeline of Jane Austen
430:The 300-year Le Faye
282:User:Brighterorange
442:
411:
383:
348:
322:
295:
265:
205:
174:
141:
109:
70:Watch peer review
486:
440:
409:
381:
346:
320:
293:
263:
203:
172:
139:
107:
72:
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
485:
484:
483:
469:
468:
242:
38:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
492:
490:
482:
481:
471:
470:
467:
466:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
247:
246:
238:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
180:
179:
161:
160:
146:
79:
74:
73:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
491:
480:
477:
476:
474:
465:
462:
459:
454:
453:
446:
443:
437:
433:
429:
428:
425:
424:
423:
422:
415:
412:
406:
401:
400:
397:
396:
395:
394:
387:
384:
378:
374:
369:
368:
366:
362:
361:
360:
359:
352:
349:
343:
339:
338:
336:
335:
334:
333:
326:
323:
317:
313:
312:
309:
308:
307:
306:
299:
296:
290:
286:
285:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
269:
266:
260:
256:
255:
252:
251:
249:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
209:
206:
200:
196:
195:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
178:
175:
169:
165:
164:
163:
162:
159:
155:
151:
147:
145:
142:
136:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
114:
113:
110:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
78:
71:
67:
66:Watch article
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
42:
37:
36:
33:
30:
23:
19:
431:
81:
76:
75:
54:Article talk
40:
31:
91:Jane Austen
432:Chronology
234:. Thanks,
287:Will do.
224:automated
473:Category
436:Awadewit
405:Awadewit
377:Awadewit
342:Awadewit
316:Awadewit
289:Awadewit
259:Awadewit
199:Awadewit
168:Awadewit
150:Simmaren
135:Awadewit
103:Awadewit
99:Janeites
87:Awadewit
83:Simmaren
20: |
185:Seegoon
119:Seegoon
62:History
50:History
41:Article
365:WP:SPS
340:Done.
197:Done.
458:Colin
228:house
16:<
441:talk
410:talk
382:talk
373:here
347:talk
321:talk
294:talk
264:talk
232:here
204:talk
189:talk
173:talk
154:talk
140:talk
123:talk
108:talk
85:and
64:) •
58:Edit
52:) •
46:Edit
236:APR
95:FLC
475::
438:|
407:|
379:|
344:|
318:|
291:|
261:|
201:|
191:)
170:|
156:)
137:|
125:)
105:|
68:•
460:°
240:t
187:(
152:(
121:(
60:|
56:(
48:|
44:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.