673:" that says only "Corruption rates in Wales are among the lowest in the world", with the sole purpose of turning the red link to blue. Editors should create stubs with a usable amount of content, or else not create the stub at all. Red links serve the purpose of notifying readers that a need exists in Knowledge (XXG) for the creation of a new article with at least minimal information content; the creation of minimalist marker stubs simply to get rid of a red link destroys this useful mechanism.
199:). But please do not "kill" red links by redirect because their red color (annoying to some readers) seems to scream for a fix. It is easy to turn any red link blue by creating a redirect, but valid red links exist for a reason, and they are the "buds" from which new Knowledge (XXG) articles grow. A valid red link should be left in place if the reader agrees on need for a future article with that best name, but does not want to provide one.
203:
Red links should not be made to articles deleted because the topic was judged unencyclopedic or lacking notability. Red links may sometimes be created to articles deleted for some other reason. In addition, even if a page has been deleted because it does not meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines, you may make a red link to the term if you intend to write an article about an entirely different topic that happens to have the same title.
49:
121:
623:
pages should be limited. The whole point of a disambiguation page is to help the reader arrive at the correct existing article from a choice of articles with similar titles. Since a red link is a link to a non-existent article, using red links in disambiguation pages is usually discouraged. Red links
190:
In general, a red link should remain in an article if there is a reasonable expectation that the article in question will eventually be created (either as its own article or as a redirect); remove red links if and only if
Knowledge (XXG) should not have any coverage on the subject. It may be possible
558:
is particularly important when creating new biography articles with article names that may not be unique. If some article has a redlink to that name but meaning a different person, the link will become blue but incorrect. This does happen in reality: for example, in 2012 a red link was placed in the
245:
the content of the article in which the red link will appear. An easy example is a technical term that merits a treatment beyond its dictionary definition, to help support its role for its existing context. A technical term could qualify because it is probably "notable" and should have that obvious
202:
Articles should not contain red links to files, to templates, or to topics that do not warrant an article, such as a celebrity's romantic interest who is not notable in their own right. Red links should not routinely be made to every chapter in a book, or to all the people mentioned in an article.
700:
upon creation). At any time, a
Wikipedian may independently write an article on the linked-to subject, and when this happens, there's already a link ready and waiting for it. The red link also gives readers the opportunity to click on it to create the needed article on the
802:
Lists of "notable people" in an article, such as the "Notable alumni" section in an article on a university, tend to accrue red links, listing people of unverifiable notability. Such red links should be removed only if it's certain the subject
478:
which also contain links to existing articles, but they cannot be excessive. Editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or the links may be removed from the template.
660:
A red link to an article that will plausibly be created in the future should be "left alone rather than being created as a minimal stub article that has no useful information." An example of a plausible red link might be to
711:
Some WikiProjects have bots that determine how many times a certain red link appears in
Knowledge (XXG). This is used to determine what articles are the most needed. Editors can also, after clicking on a red link, use the
253:. The topic may well be covered in a section of another article; it could even be buried in several paragraphs nearby. So it is the responsibility of the person who creates a red link to scan for the topic's coverage. The
656:
In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there is no existing candidate article, or article section, under any name.
688:
A new article is needed. When a
Wikipedian writes an article, it is common practice to link key topics pertinent to an understanding of the subject, even if those topics don't have an article on Knowledge (XXG) yet.
817:
The subject of the red link may be covered on another edition of
Knowledge (XXG). If such an article meets the English-language Knowledge (XXG) criteria and you are able to translate, then follow the procedures at
724:
The link may have been made by someone who wasn't aware of what should and shouldn't be linked to within articles. Always evaluate whether or not a red link is pointing at a title that actually needs creation. See
129:
Red links are for subjects that should have articles but do not. They are not only acceptable, but needed in articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it.
680:
should not be dealt with by removing the link brackets, simply to temporarily reduce the amount of red text in an article. However, red links to articles that have since been deleted should usually be unlinked.
544:. Redlinking names of people who are not obviously notable also creates a link that may be unlikely to ever become blue. Adding detail to the link makes a misdirected link less likely (but not impossible);
799:
notes, as well as in "See also" sections, are meant to serve a navigational purpose. Red links are useless in these contexts; if possible they should be replaced by a functioning link, or else be removed.
535:
Redlinking a name which may not be unique bears the risk of the link eventually pointing to an article added later for a different person, company, or place with the same name. This is unlikely for, say,
721:
The link is broken and no longer leads to an article (perhaps because the underlying article was deleted). In such a case, the link usually needs to be removed or renamed to point to an existing article.
897:
242:
1007:
924:
624:
can be used in disambiguation pages if existing encyclopedic articles (i.e. not disambiguation pages, because disambiguation pages are not considered encyclopedic) have such red links.
322:
to find any red links that your new article turned blue, (b) check whether those links refer to the topic of your new article, and (c) change any links that refer to a different topic.
1031:
1019:
651:
929:
583:. It might have been preferable to unlink the name; the writer may not be Knowledge (XXG)-notable, and even ] is not guaranteed unique; in this particular case there is
614:
669:
exists, and country-specific articles on corruption are a likely area for future creation. However, it is better to leave this link red than to create a "placeholder
934:
184:
892:
1050:
745:
56:
171:
Add red links to articles to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is
1055:
396:
913:
902:
726:
165:
537:
946:
545:
520:
957:
370:
369:
that are unlikely to be created and retained on
Knowledge (XXG), including articles that do not comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s
666:
552:. Simply redlinking names of people in an article, without detail, particularly if not obviously notable, should be avoided.
183:
from the start. Good red links help
Knowledge (XXG)—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that
740:". In this case, try to figure out the intended article and fix the link. If it looks like a common misspelling, such as
64:
215:
are placed around a word or phrase for which
Knowledge (XXG) does not have an article, disambiguation page or redirect.
265:
features crafted to find information on
Knowledge (XXG). They can help us build Knowledge (XXG), red link by red link.
1060:
620:
380:
269:
34:
884:
555:
176:
72:
989:
846:
until the name is added to English Knowledge (XXG) (as of August 2024 there is a German, but no English article);
823:
164:, signifies that the linked-to page does not exist—it either never existed, or previously existed but has been
963:
826:
instead of or next to a red link. Such links can be made manually or by using the interlanguage link template
819:
716:" function (although the article does not exist) to determine how many times the subject has been red-linked.
261:
for advanced queries that can pinpoint matching text anywhere on Knowledge (XXG). Both search methods employ
908:
748:
to the correct one, but you should still correct the misspelling even though it would no longer appear red.
446:
273:
172:
580:
146:
Most new articles are created shortly after a corresponding reference to them is entered into the system.
1003:
Most new articles are created shortly after a corresponding reference to them is entered into the system.
987:
Diomidis Spinellis and Panagiotis Louridas (August 2008). "The collaborative organization of knowledge".
677:
662:
869:
737:
705:
633:
596:
567:
to link to a future article about the book's author, ]. In 2014 an article was created for a different
495:
331:
294:
224:
81:
68:
30:
843:
161:
713:
319:
366:
257:
links at the bottom of that page will link to virtually all related articles, and the search engine
38:
952:
855:
697:
475:
196:
180:
762:
462:
392:
389:
that do not exist. Templates should only be added to a page if and after they have been created.
179:. Red links help Knowledge (XXG) grow. The creation of red links prevents new pages from being
519:
As with other topics, red links can be created to biographies of people who would likely meet
249:
Before adding a red link, make sure that its subject does not already exist under a different
670:
442:
285:
994:
794:
786:
778:
733:
434:
426:
418:
383:, or the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that already exists.
524:
376:
281:
277:
918:
254:
571:, a rocket scientist, without checking for existing incoming links. The red link in the
754:
454:
250:
1044:
770:
541:
410:
386:
696:
From within an article, such a link prepares the article to be fully supported (not
829:
17:
708:
to another article, but only if that article comprehensively deals with the topic.
584:
741:
568:
258:
575:
article thus became blue, but the link was to the wrong person. The error was
549:
241:
Create red links whenever a non-existent article with more information would
998:
483:
262:
403:
Because they are useless as navigation aids, do not create red links in:
684:
An existing red link can indicate one or more of the following things:
151:
Spinellis and Louridas, "The Collaborative Organization of Knowledge"
921:– including instructions to change the color, if you don't like red
587:, though without a Knowledge (XXG) article as of September 2024.
395:
that do not exist. Such red links are categorized for cleanup at
925:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2008-08-11/Growth study
898:
Knowledge (XXG):Only make links that are relevant to the context
615:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages § Red links
115:
43:
824:
a link to the article in the other edition of Knowledge (XXG)
195:
where the subject is covered as part of a broader topic (see
439:, which are intended to direct readers to existing articles.
732:
The red link may be a typo—e.g., someone wanted to link to
727:
WP:Manual of Style/Linking#What generally should be linked
930:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2014-08-13/Op-ed
67:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
865:{{ill|Hooglede town hall|nl|Gemeentehuis van Hooglede}}
641:
604:
576:
561:
510:
503:
353:
346:
339:
309:
302:
232:
103:
96:
89:
652:
Knowledge (XXG):Creation of example red links as pages
935:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1008:
WP:Inflationary hypothesis of Knowledge (XXG) growth
276:
guidelines for topics (including those for people (
211:A red link appears whenever double square brackets
191:to turn the red link into a redirect to an article
268:Take care when creating a red link that it has a
579:, by renaming the link, which remained red, to
861:If the English and foreign names are different:
326:Avoiding creation of certain types of red links
197:Notability – Whether to create standalone pages
144:
55:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
1020:WP:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2009-01-31/Orphans
37:. For the RedWarn counter-vandalism tool, see
893:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Red Link Recovery
704:The red link may identify a need to create a
8:
29:"WP:RED" redirects here. For redirects, see
982:
980:
521:Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines for notability
63:Editors should generally follow it, though
807:qualify for an article on Knowledge (XXG).
134:if you are certain that Knowledge (XXG)
976:
914:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Linking
903:Knowledge (XXG):Write the article first
379:that do not exist. Either the category
540:, but very likely for football player
676:Likewise, a valid red link term like
585:at least one more writer of that name
482:Red links are not to be shown on the
7:
966:– red-linked lists focusing on women
947:Knowledge (XXG):Most-wanted articles
854:links to the existing English page:
397:Category:Articles with missing files
185:Knowledge (XXG) is far from finished
1030:For past examples listed here, see
538:Thomas Howard, 14th Earl of Arundel
527:equally apply to red-linked names.
318:After creating an article, (a) use
1051:Knowledge (XXG) editing guidelines
958:Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles
71:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
812:Red links and interlanguage links
1032:/History of the example red link
546:John Alexander Smith (physician)
525:our biographies on living people
138:have an article on that subject.
119:
47:
693:This has several applications:
628:Dealing with existing red links
746:redirect from that misspelling
691:Do not remove these red links.
667:Corruption in Northern Ireland
523:. All the rules that apply to
35:Knowledge (XXG):Reference desk
33:. For the Reference desk, see
1:
1056:WikiProject Red Link Recovery
993:. Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 68–73.
751:Links in any of the various
362:Do not create red links to:
964:Knowledge (XXG):WIR/REDLIST
851:{{ill|Hanning Schröder|de}}
839:{{ill|Richard J. Youle|de}}
744:, you may want to create a
272:and that its subject meets
1077:
949:– most red-linked articles
649:
631:
612:
594:
493:
329:
292:
222:
79:
73:this guideline's talk page
28:
990:Communications of the ACM
474:Red links may be used in
577:not corrected until 2016
490:To biographical articles
243:help a reader understand
219:When to create red links
127:This page in a nutshell:
31:Knowledge (XXG):Redirect
999:10.1145/1378704.1378720
909:Help:Your first article
591:In disambiguation pages
559:article about the book
556:Checking incoming links
665:, since an article on
148:
1061:Knowledge (XXG) links
960:– red-linked articles
736:, but instead typed "
393:Knowledge (XXG) files
132:Only remove red links
619:Use of red links on
581:Tom Mueller (writer)
953:Special:WantedPages
678:Corruption in Wales
663:Corruption in Wales
310:WP:CHECKAFTERCREATE
18:Knowledge (XXG):RED
941:Lists of red links
870:Hooglede town hall
407:Templates such as
371:naming conventions
207:Creating red links
885:Cleanup red links
738:African eelephant
381:should be created
259:provides features
162:like this example
142:
141:
114:
113:
57:editing guideline
16:(Redirected from
1068:
1035:
1028:
1022:
1017:
1011:
1005:
984:
889:
883:
867:
866:
856:Hanning Schröder
853:
852:
844:Richard J. Youle
841:
840:
833:
798:
790:
782:
774:
766:
758:
734:African elephant
644:
607:
566:
531:Non-unique names
513:
506:
466:
458:
438:
430:
422:
414:
356:
349:
342:
312:
305:
303:WP:INCOMINGLINKS
280:), web content (
235:
214:
152:
123:
122:
116:
106:
99:
92:
51:
50:
44:
21:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1029:
1025:
1018:
1014:
986:
985:
978:
973:
943:
919:Help:Link color
887:
881:
878:
864:
863:
850:
849:
838:
837:
827:
814:
792:
784:
776:
768:
760:
752:
714:what links here
654:
648:
647:
640:
636:
630:
617:
611:
610:
603:
599:
593:
573:Extra Virginity
563:Extra Virginity
560:
548:is better than
533:
517:
516:
509:
502:
498:
492:
470:Redirect pages.
460:
452:
432:
424:
416:
408:
360:
359:
352:
345:
338:
334:
328:
320:What links here
316:
315:
308:
301:
297:
284:), businesses (
239:
238:
231:
227:
221:
212:
209:
154:
150:
120:
110:
109:
102:
95:
88:
84:
76:
48:
42:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1074:
1072:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1023:
1012:
975:
974:
972:
969:
968:
967:
961:
955:
950:
942:
939:
938:
937:
932:
927:
922:
916:
911:
906:
900:
895:
890:
877:
874:
873:
872:
862:
859:
847:
835:
822:; if not, use
820:WP:Translation
813:
810:
809:
808:
800:
749:
730:
722:
719:
718:
717:
709:
702:
646:
645:
637:
632:
629:
626:
621:disambiguation
609:
608:
600:
595:
592:
589:
532:
529:
515:
514:
507:
499:
494:
491:
488:
472:
471:
468:
450:
445:sections (see
440:
401:
400:
390:
384:
374:
358:
357:
350:
343:
335:
330:
327:
324:
314:
313:
306:
298:
293:
237:
236:
228:
223:
220:
217:
208:
205:
194:
143:
140:
139:
124:
112:
111:
108:
107:
100:
93:
85:
80:
77:
62:
61:
52:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1073:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1033:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
983:
981:
977:
970:
965:
962:
959:
956:
954:
951:
948:
945:
944:
940:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
923:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
886:
880:
879:
875:
871:
860:
857:
848:
845:
836:
834:. For example
831:
825:
821:
816:
815:
811:
806:
801:
796:
788:
780:
772:
767:hatnotes, in
764:
756:
750:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
728:
723:
720:
715:
710:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
692:
687:
686:
685:
682:
679:
674:
672:
668:
664:
658:
653:
643:
639:
638:
635:
627:
625:
622:
616:
606:
602:
601:
598:
590:
588:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
565:
564:
557:
553:
551:
547:
543:
542:Thomas Howard
539:
530:
528:
526:
522:
512:
511:WP:REDLINKBIO
508:
505:
501:
500:
497:
489:
487:
485:
480:
477:
469:
464:
456:
451:
448:
447:WP:NOTSEEALSO
444:
441:
436:
428:
420:
412:
406:
405:
404:
398:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
378:
375:
372:
368:
365:
364:
363:
355:
351:
348:
344:
341:
337:
336:
333:
325:
323:
321:
311:
307:
304:
300:
299:
296:
291:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
244:
234:
230:
229:
226:
218:
216:
206:
204:
200:
198:
192:
188:
186:
182:
178:
174:
169:
167:
163:
159:
153:
147:
137:
133:
128:
125:
118:
117:
105:
101:
98:
94:
91:
87:
86:
83:
78:
74:
70:
66:
60:
58:
53:
46:
45:
40:
36:
32:
27:
19:
1026:
1015:
1002:
988:
804:
690:
683:
675:
659:
655:
618:
572:
562:
554:
534:
518:
481:
473:
402:
361:
317:
290:
267:
248:
240:
210:
201:
189:
170:
157:
155:
149:
145:
135:
131:
126:
54:
26:
742:Scandanavia
613:Main page:
569:Tom Mueller
270:valid title
104:WP:REDLINKS
1045:Categories
971:References
905:– an essay
868:produces:
842:produces:
650:See also:
642:WP:REDDEAL
550:John Smith
377:Categories
288:), etc.).
274:notability
177:verifiable
136:should not
97:WP:REDLINK
65:exceptions
39:WP:REDWARN
1006:See also
805:would not
763:Otheruses
605:WP:REDDAB
504:WP:REDBIO
496:Shortcuts
484:Main Page
467:hatnotes.
463:Otheruses
387:Templates
347:WP:REDNOT
332:Shortcuts
295:Shortcuts
263:MediaWiki
251:page name
233:WP:REDYES
82:Shortcuts
69:consensus
876:See also
706:redirect
698:orphaned
634:Shortcut
597:Shortcut
476:navboxes
443:See also
367:Articles
354:WP:NORED
340:WP:REDNO
255:category
225:Shortcut
181:orphaned
158:red link
795:Seealso
787:Further
779:Details
435:Seealso
427:Further
419:Details
286:WP:CORP
246:title.
193:section
173:notable
166:deleted
791:, and
431:, and
282:WP:WEB
278:WP:BIO
90:WP:RED
755:About
701:spot.
455:About
771:Main
759:and
671:stub
459:and
411:Main
175:and
995:doi
830:ill
168:.
1047::
1001:.
979:^
888:}}
882:{{
832:}}
828:{{
797:}}
793:{{
789:}}
785:{{
783:,
781:}}
777:{{
775:,
773:}}
769:{{
765:}}
761:{{
757:}}
753:{{
486:.
465:}}
461:{{
457:}}
453:{{
449:).
437:}}
433:{{
429:}}
425:{{
423:,
421:}}
417:{{
415:,
413:}}
409:{{
187:.
160:,
156:A
1034:.
1010:.
997::
858:.
729:.
712:"
399:.
373:.
213:]
75:.
59:.
41:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.