860:. Choose any article and examine it to see why an editor has tagged it; you may have to check the article history or the Discussion page to find out. If the tag is dated, look at the history of that month and the month preceding it. Improve the article by deleting the recentism or adding information that brings the piece into chronological balance (this may take a while because you have to find reputable sources). You might have to add an "Expert Needed" tag and move on. (For information, see
825:
65:
495:. When dealing with contemporary subjects, editors should consider whether they are simply regurgitating media coverage of an issue or actually adding well-sourced information that will remain notable over time. Yes, unneeded content can be eliminated later, but a cluttered "first draft" of an article may degrade its eventual quality and a coherent orientation may not always be attained.
543:, which was developed day by day as the trial and appeals process advanced. Eventually, when the process ended, later editors could place everything in perspective—while also retaining the chronological coverage as an exhaustive historical record. (As of June 2024 this article is still marked as "Cleanup Needed", showing that the editing procedure is never really ended.)
735:? Many articles can be condensed to keep only the most important information, the wider notable effects of an event, and links to related issues. Much of the timeline and the day-to-day updates collected in the "rough draft" stages can safely be excised. A number of the citations to breaking news reports written at the time of the event (especially those later
167:
536:; new Knowledge (XXG) articles are immediately published in what might be considered draft form: They can be—and are—improved in real time; these rapidly developing drafts may appear to be a clutter of news links and half-developed thoughts, but later, as the big picture emerges, the least relevant content ought to be—and often is—eliminated.
151:
285:
Over-use of recent material does not by itself mean that an article should be deleted, but the quick and contemporaneous passage of events may make any subject difficult to judge as actually notable enough for a permanent encyclopedia entry. Proper perspective requires maturity, judgment, and the
546:
Collaborative editing on
Knowledge (XXG) has resulted in a massive encyclopedia of comprehensive and well-balanced articles on the many current events of the twenty-first century. This record will be valuable to those in the future who seek to understand the history of this time period. In other
550:
One of
Knowledge (XXG)'s strengths is the collation and sifting through of vast amounts of reporting on current events, producing encyclopedia-quality articles in real time about ongoing events or developing stories: natural disasters, political campaigns and elections, wars, product releases,
383:
This tendency towards article imbalance is enhanced by the availability of reliable sources, which is not uniform across different topics. This manifests both from the language a source is written in and the ease with which it can be accessed. Sources published in a medium that is both widely
367:
Subjects with a long history might be described in purely modern terms, even though they were actually more significant in the past than they are today. Even when the topics remain significant, articles can cover the subject as if the most recent events were the salient, defining traits. For
781:
This is especially true during a news spike, when there is mass interest to create and update articles on a current event, regardless of whether it may be historically significant later on. Also, editors updating an article affected by a current event may not necessarily be the same ones
423:
Thus, a political candidate's biography might become bloated with specific details related to a particular, recent election. Long passages in an athlete's or an actor's biography might be devoted to detailed coverage of a recent controversy. With celebrities, an article about a
191:
Articles deleted despite concerning notable trans-historical subject matter, because a recentist article has given only flimsy and transient details available in news reports without the accompanying historical perspective, and because editors proposing deletion don't bother to
558:. But by documenting timely material with reliable sources at the outset, more permanent sources will hopefully be found and used later - and, with the original online sources linked from Knowledge (XXG), they are much more likely to be picked up and archived by the
317:
A news spike is a sudden mass interest in any current event, whereupon
Wikipedians create and update articles on it, even if some readers later feel that the topic was not historically significant in any way. The result might be a well-written and well-documented
739:) could be replaced by those to more scholarly, historical, or retrospective references created later on. Any detailed subarticle relating to the event may also be either merged back into the main article, or deleted (this includes any article about a subject
228:
Impassioned discussions on talk pages that debate not just the notability of the recent event ("Is this topic of lasting importance?") but also where (if anywhere) it should receive coverage on
Knowledge (XXG). Often conducted in ignorance of the historical
597:
What might seem at the time to be an excessive amount of information on recent topics actually serves the purpose of drawing in new readers—and among them, potential new
Wikipedians. Example: Knowledge (XXG) received positive coverage on the American
804:
at the top of articles to warn the reader that the content may be tilted toward recent perspectives. (Tagging is a subject of debate: Some think tags on articles make them ugly or caution readers that a tagged article is defective.)
727:
for a single incident or event is not necessarily an appropriate topic for a standalone biographical article, if their notability claim is not likely to still be of sustained public interest in the next few decades.
159:
Some
Knowledge (XXG) articles tend to focus on recent events. Knowledge (XXG) has been praised for the way it deals with current news breaks. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to be aware of balance and historical
237:
process, and has positive aspects as well – up-to-date information on breaking news events, vetted and counter-vetted by enthusiastic volunteer editors, is something that no other encyclopedia can offer. Still,
628:
outlook into how the state and federal governments in the United States interact constitutionally, some insight into motivations for politicians to intervene in court cases, and nuances of end-of-life issues.
384:
available and familiar to editors, such as a news website, are more likely to be used than those from esoteric or foreign-language publications regardless of their reliability. For example, a 2010 story on
176:
is a phenomenon on
Knowledge (XXG) where an article has an inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events. It is writing without an aim toward a long-term, historical view. This can result in, among others:
488:
Recentism in one sense—established articles that are bloated with event-specific facts at the expense of longstanding content—is considered a
Knowledge (XXG) fault, as discussed above under News Spikes.
472:
debate. (Deletionists tend to view
Knowledge (XXG) as a traditional, rigorous encyclopedia. Inclusionists tend to see it as a compendium of all knowledge, with broader remit.) Many editors identify as
452:
changed rapidly and substantially during
October 2012, with over 700Â edits to the article in that month alone compared to 85 for the rest of the year to that point. Eventually, a breakout article,
498:
The second sense of recentism—the creation of a glut of new articles on a recent event—can result in a slap-dash approach to the subject and a rambling, disorganized look to the encyclopedia.
620:
The related articles that are written during a "recentist news frenzy" provide an in-depth look for interested readers. For example, the Terri Schiavo piece and its companion articles at
274:
into multiple articles in order to achieve a balance not readily attainable within a single article. Sometimes in-depth information on current events is more appropriately added to
262:
Allegations of recentism should prompt consideration of proportion, balance, and due weight. Material may need to be moved, deleted, or expanded. Certain articles might be
692:
Will someone ten or twenty years from now be confused about how this article is written? In ten or twenty years will this addition still appear relevant? If I am devoting
327:
1284:
857:
210:
1328:
1323:
986:
448:
justification behind the creation of their article in the first place. For example, Knowledge (XXG)'s article on English disk jockey and television presenter
712:
article might seem logical. Nevertheless, in the future, when neither event is fresh, readers will benefit from a similar level of detail in both articles.
342:
896:
354:
206:
312:
709:
705:
1308:
1177:
570:
Search engines drive a large amount of traffic to Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about what were at the moment recent events—for example, the death of
1313:
333:
An event that occurs in a certain geographic region might come to dominate an entire article about that region. For example, in the aftermath of
540:
380:, the stress might be on simply the last few centuries, though the subject matter of the article might have a history of thousands of years.
1143:
964:
720:
85:
1202:
782:
participating months (or even years) later in the clean-up and maintenance of the page. Above all else, editors should avoid getting into
94:
591:
923:
267:
247:
77:
35:
453:
952:
770:
1290:
1131:
1102:
308:
1119:
1107:
1090:
853:
Of course this tag, like many others, should be employed only if editors cannot immediately rectify the problems themselves.
73:
1155:
575:
1318:
1046:
1017:
1012:
731:
After "recentist" articles have calmed down and the number of edits per day has dropped to a minimum, why not initiate
432:
who became famous decades ago for achievements on stage may focus almost exclusively on recent news reports of alleged
621:
609:
1029:
979:
879:
532:
In many cases, such content is a valuable preliminary stage in presenting information. Any encyclopedia goes through
202:
1218:
935:
362:
358:
195:
The muddling or diffusion of the timeless facets of a subject, previously recognized by Knowledge (XXG) consensus.
940:
783:
198:
93:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
719:, particularly the "Presumed" criterion. Content that seemed notable at the time might, in retrospect, violate
250:, with attention to the long-term significance of the information included, and with awareness that, under the
1160:
1124:
969:
889:
480:, or some other more nuanced position, and they may have their own thoughts on dealing with recent material.
1215:, proseline is the tendency to choppy writing, often containing dates, that ends up looking like a timeline
1165:
1083:
1068:
736:
222:
182:
81:
54:
1208:
1170:
1095:
1078:
906:
271:
98:
599:
279:
39:
1223:
901:
884:
740:
638:
108:
547:
words: "If we don't make sense of it today, someone else will struggle to make sense of it tomorrow."
464:
Any disagreement over whether to remove an article might also be related to Knowledge (XXG)'s ongoing
1187:
1022:
974:
778:
685:
492:
263:
239:
400:
31:
1182:
1034:
928:
214:
798:
341:
article was inundated with day-by-day facts about the hurricane. The solution: an article on the
1136:
1039:
1007:
911:
724:
499:
243:
864:.) Sometimes you won't agree with the assessment, and you can simply remove the Recentism tag.
583:
441:
334:
323:
1148:
957:
945:
319:
218:
777:
later on. Editors writing today do not have a historical perspective on today's events, and
404:. Similarly, the cost of access to a source can be a barrier; for example, most research in
1112:
1073:
1061:
991:
916:
774:
716:
554:
Finally, Knowledge (XXG) articles are often developed via on-line references, which may be
503:
251:
559:
861:
1079:§ Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time
1235:
445:
17:
1302:
571:
1256:
760:
715:
Furthermore, detailed stand-alone articles and lists may no longer comply with the
604:
587:
449:
465:
525:
469:
338:
47:
355:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons § Avoid gossip and feedback loops
625:
516:
477:
437:
425:
417:
405:
394:
43:
684:
as a thought experiment that might be helpful, but keep in mind the policy
749:
555:
413:
389:
373:
275:
786:
or contentious deletion discussions when trying to deal with recentism.
473:
1051:
594:, and newsy articles like those from other English-speaking countries.
579:
433:
369:
234:
1023:§ Article spinoffs: "Summary style" meta-articles and summary sections
533:
330:). Still, these articles are valuable for future historical research.
322:
article on a topic that might hardly be remembered a month later (see
166:
1287:(includes graphs of years by number of references in Knowledge (XXG))
1285:
The Four Eras Of Knowledge (XXG) And Visualizing History Without Maps
1056:
980:§ Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information
1205:– essay discussing how to prevent content from degrading over time
723:
and other guidelines. Similarly, a person who receives a temporary
856:
You can find a list of articles that have been tagged by going to
500:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information
429:
409:
233:
Recentism is a symptom of Knowledge (XXG)'s dynamic and immediate
841:
Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective and
818:
392:
website is more likely to be cited than a 1970 edition of the
385:
377:
145:
59:
696:
time to it than other topics in the article, will it appear
313:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources § Breaking news
165:
289:
345:
was created to collect this quickly accumulating content.
254:, not every topic will merit its own stand-alone article.
1293:
Coverage Rapid, And Often Wrong, In Tragedy's Early Hours
1113:§ Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films
420:
are available only through costly subscription services.
970:§ Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox or means of promotion
842:
667:
660:
653:
646:
130:
123:
116:
562:
or other similar web archives before they disappear.
201:
over whether to change an article's well-established
42:. For guidelines on using "recent" in articles, see
1257:"GET ME REWRITE: Transcript, Friday, July 08, 2005"
987:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
309:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (events) § Breaking news
30:"WP:RECENT" redirects here. You may be looking for
704:For example, in 2020, devoting more space to the
359:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability § Access to sources
1255:Gladstone, Brooke; Garfield, Bob (8 July 2005).
363:Knowledge (XXG):Systemic bias § External factors
858:Category:Articles slanted towards recent events
586:and election of a successor, the nomination of
514:
244:not an indiscriminate collection of information
504:Knowledge (XXG)'s general notability guideline
221:or article body on the basis of those used on
897:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
188:Articles created on flimsy, transient merits.
8:
946:§ Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion
1178:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources (medicine)
965:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
86:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
779:should not pretend to have a crystal ball.
343:Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans
958:§ Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
759:project was founded to provide in-depth "
1149:§ Not yet or newly published periodicals
1144:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (periodicals)
710:2000 United States presidential election
706:2020 United States presidential election
290:§ Suggestions for dealing with recentism
270:list. Conversely, an article might need
95:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1329:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality
1324:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability
1247:
1203:Knowledge (XXG):Build content to endure
181:Articles overburdened with documenting
794:Some editors employ the Recentism tag
633:Suggestions for dealing with recentism
506:to merit its own stand-alone article.
408:is freely available to the public via
924:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
912:§ Subjects notable only for one event
541:Pitcairn sexual assault trial of 2004
268:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
78:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
36:Knowledge (XXG):Recent changes patrol
7:
1084:§ Whether to create standalone pages
1040:§ Naming the specific topic articles
975:§ Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper
953:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
700:relevant than what is already here?
246:. Articles should be written from a
1137:§ People notable for only one event
1132:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
1103:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (events)
763:"-like coverage of current events.
519:is a first rough draft of history.
1309:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental pages
1120:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (music)
1108:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (films)
1091:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (books)
616:Recentist articles as case studies
592:Supreme Court of the United States
493:Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper
240:Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper
99:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
1314:Knowledge (XXG) content selection
907:§ Avoid gossip and feedback loops
454:Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal
1156:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources
917:§ Recently dead or probably dead
862:Knowledge (XXG):TC#Expert_needed
823:
608:about its quick response to the
217:and spelling, or wording in the
149:
63:
1047:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style
1018:§ Unacceptable types of forking
1013:Knowledge (XXG):Content forking
741:only notable for that one event
1074:§ General notability guideline
1030:Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation
885:§ Deciding on an article title
880:Knowledge (XXG):Article titles
185:and controversy as it happens.
1:
1219:Knowledge (XXG):Systemic bias
936:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
845:related to non-recent events.
836:slanted towards recent events
328:the article's deletion debate
755:Unlike Knowledge (XXG), the
717:general notability guideline
610:London bombings of July 2005
576:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake
502:, and not every topic meets
368:large-scale topics, such as
252:general notability guideline
1183:§ Respect secondary sources
1052:§ Retaining existing styles
1035:§ Is there a primary topic?
721:what Knowledge (XXG) is not
622:Category:Terri Schiavo case
287:
215:national variety of English
1345:
1069:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
636:
444:use—none of which are the
352:
306:
106:
82:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
52:
29:
1209:Knowledge (XXG):Proseline
1188:§ Use up-to-date evidence
1096:§ Not-yet-published books
809:The tag looks like this:
211:date and numbering format
1224:Knowledge (XXG):Too soon
566:Recentism as recruitment
157:This page in a nutshell:
53:Not to be confused with
510:Recentism as a positive
484:Recentism as a negative
1319:Knowledge (XXG) essays
817:
737:found to be inaccurate
733:comprehensive rewrites
702:
521:
170:
27:Wikimedia project page
18:Knowledge (XXG):Recent
1125:§ Unreleased material
1008:Knowledge (XXG):As of
807:
725:blip of news coverage
690:
600:National Public Radio
460:Debate over recentism
320:neutral-point-of-view
278:, which can be found
248:neutral point of view
223:breaking news sources
183:breaking news reports
169:
40:Special:RecentChanges
815:and results in this:
775:consensus can change
771:there is no deadline
708:article than to the
929:§ Balancing aspects
556:temporary in nature
539:One example is the
258:What to do about it
97:as it has not been
32:Help:Recent changes
767:Just wait and see.
171:
1291:NPR audio/text -
1211:– the nephew of
851:
850:
790:The Recentism tag
584:Pope John Paul II
442:recreational drug
349:Article imbalance
335:Hurricane Katrina
324:Jennifer Wilbanks
266:or placed on the
164:
163:
143:Explanatory essay
141:
140:
74:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
1336:
1272:
1271:
1269:
1267:
1252:
846:
843:add more content
827:
826:
819:
814:
813:
803:
797:
682:twenty-year test
670:
663:
656:
649:
551:assassinations.
528:
401:VeÄŤernje novosti
293:
286:passage of time
153:
152:
146:
133:
126:
119:
67:
66:
60:
21:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1299:
1298:
1281:
1276:
1275:
1265:
1263:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1244:
1232:
1199:
1194:
1166:§ Breaking news
1003:
998:
941:§ Accessibility
902:§ Writing style
875:
870:
847:
840:
828:
824:
811:
810:
801:
795:
792:
674:
673:
666:
659:
652:
645:
641:
635:
618:
582:, the death of
578:and subsequent
568:
560:Wayback Machine
530:
523:
512:
486:
462:
365:
351:
315:
305:
300:
260:
150:
144:
137:
136:
129:
122:
115:
111:
103:
102:
64:
58:
51:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1342:
1340:
1332:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1301:
1300:
1297:
1296:
1288:
1280:
1279:External links
1277:
1274:
1273:
1246:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1236:Exceptionalism
1231:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1206:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1185:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1105:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1020:
1010:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
996:
995:
994:
984:
983:
982:
977:
972:
962:
961:
960:
950:
949:
948:
943:
933:
932:
931:
921:
920:
919:
914:
909:
904:
894:
893:
892:
890:§ Name changes
887:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
849:
848:
834:appears to be
831:
829:
822:
791:
788:
672:
671:
664:
657:
650:
642:
637:
634:
631:
617:
614:
567:
564:
513:
511:
508:
485:
482:
461:
458:
456:was required.
350:
347:
304:
301:
299:
296:
259:
256:
231:
230:
226:
196:
193:
189:
186:
162:
161:
154:
142:
139:
138:
135:
134:
127:
120:
112:
107:
104:
92:
91:
70:
68:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1341:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1304:
1295:
1294:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1262:
1258:
1251:
1248:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1161:§ Age matters
1159:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1000:
993:
990:
989:
988:
985:
981:
978:
976:
973:
971:
968:
967:
966:
963:
959:
956:
955:
954:
951:
947:
944:
942:
939:
938:
937:
934:
930:
927:
926:
925:
922:
918:
915:
913:
910:
908:
905:
903:
900:
899:
898:
895:
891:
888:
886:
883:
882:
881:
878:
877:
872:
867:
865:
863:
859:
854:
844:
839:
837:
832:This article
830:
821:
820:
816:
812:{{Recentism}}
806:
800:
789:
787:
785:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
762:
758:
754:
752:
751:
744:
742:
738:
734:
729:
726:
722:
718:
713:
711:
707:
701:
699:
695:
689:
687:
683:
679:
678:ten-year test
676:Consider the
669:
668:WP:20YEARTEST
665:
662:
658:
655:
654:WP:10YEARTEST
651:
648:
644:
643:
640:
632:
630:
627:
623:
615:
613:
611:
607:
606:
601:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:Ronald Reagan
565:
563:
561:
557:
552:
548:
544:
542:
537:
535:
529:
527:
520:
518:
509:
507:
505:
501:
496:
494:
490:
483:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
459:
457:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
421:
419:
416:, while many
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
397:
396:
391:
387:
381:
379:
375:
371:
364:
360:
356:
348:
346:
344:
340:
336:
331:
329:
325:
321:
314:
310:
302:
297:
295:
291:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
257:
255:
253:
249:
245:
241:
236:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
179:
178:
175:
168:
158:
155:
148:
147:
132:
128:
125:
121:
118:
114:
113:
110:
105:
100:
96:
89:
87:
83:
79:
75:
69:
62:
61:
56:
55:WP:Presentism
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1292:
1264:. Retrieved
1261:On The Media
1260:
1250:
1212:
992:§ Neologisms
855:
852:
835:
833:
808:
793:
766:
765:
761:news article
756:
748:
746:
745:
732:
730:
714:
703:
697:
693:
691:
681:
677:
675:
619:
605:On the Media
603:
596:
588:John Roberts
569:
553:
549:
545:
538:
534:rough drafts
531:
522:
515:
497:
491:
487:
466:inclusionism
463:
450:Jimmy Savile
422:
418:law journals
399:
393:
382:
366:
332:
316:
284:
261:
232:
219:lead section
207:abbreviation
199:Edit warring
173:
172:
160:perspective.
156:
124:WP:RECENTISM
71:
1171:§ Headlines
526:Phil Graham
478:separatists
470:deletionism
339:New Orleans
303:News spikes
272:to be split
72:This is an
48:MOS:RELTIME
1303:Categories
1242:References
1057:§ Identity
1001:Guidelines
686:WP:CRYSTAL
626:case-study
624:provide a
517:Journalism
446:Notability
438:infidelity
428:singer or
426:rock music
353:See also:
307:See also:
288:(see also
242:and it is
131:WP:RECENCY
76:about the
1213:recentism
1062:§ Current
799:Recentism
784:edit wars
769:Remember
639:Shortcuts
406:astronomy
395:Thai Post
235:editorial
192:research.
174:Recentism
117:WP:RECENT
109:Shortcuts
44:MOS:DATED
1230:Articles
873:Policies
868:See also
757:Wikinews
750:Wikinews
602:program
474:mergists
468:-versus-
434:scandals
414:NASA ADS
390:BBC News
374:marriage
298:Examples
292:, below)
276:Wikinews
88:policies
1266:19 July
661:WP:20YT
647:WP:10YT
590:to the
580:tsunami
370:slavery
1197:Essays
773:, and
574:, the
361:, and
337:, the
311:, and
264:merged
229:facts.
84:, and
440:, or
430:actor
410:arXiv
376:, or
203:title
38:, or
1268:2016
747:Use
698:more
694:more
326:and
280:here
46:and
743:).
680:or
412:or
398:or
388:or
386:CNN
378:war
1305::
1259:.
802:}}
796:{{
688::
612:.
476:,
436:,
372:,
357:,
294:.
282:.
213:,
209:,
205:,
90:.
80:,
34:,
1270:.
838:.
753:.
524:—
225:.
101:.
57:.
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
