357:
one are linked. I propose the redirect to be deleted to avoid confusion with the name, and perhaps introducing an erroneous designation for this aircraft (given the current impact of
Knowledge). I have corrected all links to and from this articles to the proper FAB 001 designation, as well as adding the unofficial designations of "Aerolula" and "FAB Santos Dumont".
124:. This discussion seems to have ground to halt several days ago without reaching a conclusion. I suggest further discussion on the relevant talkpages about how to deal with the issues raised. You can retarget the redirects as an editorial decision if consensus is reached to do so or renominate them if deletion is found necessary.
232:"The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that an average user will wind up staring blankly at a "Search results 1-10 out of 378" search page instead of the article they were looking for. If someone could plausibly type in the redirect's name when searching for the target article, it's a good redirect."
85:
the Gas
Rationing Plan. It has just begun the lengthy process by which a bill becomes law, it has not been voted on in committee, etc. To suggest that the act led to the gas rationing, as the creator of both the article and the redirect is trying to do, is OR nonsense. See BBC coverage of gas rationing at:
356:
The original name of the article was probably due to a misunderstanding of
Portuguese, since "Uno" is not "one" in Portuguese, furthermore, there is no such designation both officially and unofficially. For instance, by searching the Brazilian Google for the term, no articles other than the Knowledge
285:
that all the rank names could redirect to. The
Maginificent Seven (Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species) are common to all the codes (but not always consistently regulated by them), and then there are (1) intermediate ranks mentioned by the codes, (2) intermediate ranks not mentioned
295:
Yes, that would probably be better, having a single page for all of the redirects, even though they have different meanings. Chick, I think that infraclass biology means something different than infraclass zoology, in which case different redirects would be appropriate. But if there were a single
246:
Okay, I see. It's on the taxonomic template of ranks, infraspecies is. It should not be there. I have asked for the template to be edited. Great catch, Chick. Hmmm, this may need looked into. In zoology, I think infraclass is a rank, like subclass, but infraspecies refers to the species lower
84:
says: "2007 Gas
Rationing Plan in Iran refers to a plan launched by president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's cabinet to counter to US action to limit Iran's gasoline supply (so called: The Iran Sanctions Enhancement Act of 2007)". In reality, the Iran Sanctions Enhancement Act was introduced two days AFTER
211:
The ideal solution would be a target for the redirects (doesn't have to be the current one) in which at least one of the terms would be a bolded lead word. A little bit of information added to the Rank article down toward the bottom would be a less ideal solution, but acceptable if it could be
180:
Ah, Brya. Her block has nothing to do with the credibility of the article, but rather with her personal credibility, because of the nature of the block, so let's not include this in the discussion. I will add some statement(s) about "infra" and someone else can edit, and we can leave it at
225:
Well, I'd like to explore why and how you ended up at rank, particularly a purely taxonomical article (isn't it a redirect from Taxa (zoology)? Breed is a fairly non-technical term that merits its own article outside of crap on
193:
both, unless they can be added to the primary article; the original entry for
Infraspecies barely rises to the level of a Wiktionary entry. Not every word needs its own Knowledge article, even a redirect.--
149:
There is no information about either at the target article, which is confusing. There once was a stub on this topic, which has been at both of the above names; the history of it is now
34:
39:
229:
I thought the idea behind a redirect could also be to direct the reader to an article that discusses the term, when the term itself does not merit an entire article:
269:
54:
202:
But I thought that was the purpose of a redirect, to direct the reader to the containing article, when the word itself is insufficient for an article?
286:
by the codes but in common use, and (3) intermediate ranks of historical importance only. Such an article could bring together a lot of material.--
21:
153:. I gather that one sentence was not quite accurate; hence the redirect. But that leaves us with some confusing links from other articles.
181:
that--these are nomenclaturaly defined words, so the redirects are required to make the usage of the primary article robust, that's all.
17:
281:
My point was that a redirect isn't very useful if the target page doesn't even define the term. Perhaps it would be useful to have a
81:
58:
296:
page with everything, the differences could also be seen by other editors trying to figure out what articles are doing.
92:
282:
374:
361:
352:
300:
290:
276:
251:
241:
220:
206:
197:
185:
175:
157:
135:
98:
76:
216:
and had no idea why, which is the situation I'd like to avoid. Thanks for looking into this, KP Botany.
358:
265:
131:
212:
highlighted in some fashion, I think. What happened to me today is that I ended up at rank from
237:
While not the average reader, it is concievable to look up "infraspecies" in an encyclopedia.
287:
194:
273:
217:
172:
154:
69:
261:
110:
348:
297:
248:
238:
203:
182:
126:
114:
381:
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
371:
323:
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
104:
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
95:
89:
86:
164:
142:
73:
257:
345:
333:
329:
213:
168:
150:
80:
This is essentially propaganda. The first sentence of
256:Well, while you're looking into things, I see that
272:. Seems a little odd to me; what do you think?
8:
55:The Iran Sanctions Enhancement Act of 2007
7:
145:, which points to the same target.
28:
18:Knowledge:Redirects for discussion
163:Incidentally, the creator of the
283:Rank (biological classification)
94:or choose your own news source.
82:2007 Gas Rationing Plan in Iran
59:2007 Gas Rationing Plan in Iran
1:
339:The result of the debate was
120:The result of the debate was
64:The result of the debate was
268:is an odd little chart with
72:. No longer a redirect. ---
397:
362:20:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
277:23:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
270:very little linking to it
252:23:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
242:23:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
221:23:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
207:22:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
198:22:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
186:22:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
176:21:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
158:21:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
99:21:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
375:00:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
353:08:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
301:22:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
291:03:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
136:19:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
77:17:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
266:Infraclass (zoology)
169:indefinitely blocked
91:, AP coverage at:
66:article re-written
370:per nominator. --
388:
134:
70:User:Sina Kardar
44:
33:
396:
395:
391:
390:
389:
387:
386:
385:
384:
337:
326:
262:Class (biology)
247:than species.
171:on October 21.
151:at Infraspecies
125:
118:
111:Infrasubspecies
107:
62:
51:
46:
45:
42:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
394:
392:
378:
377:
338:
336:
327:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
235:
234:
233:
227:
188:
147:
146:
138:
119:
117:
115:Rank (zoology)
108:
63:
61:
52:
50:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
393:
383:
382:
376:
373:
369:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
354:
351:
350:
347:
342:
335:
331:
328:
325:
324:
302:
299:
294:
293:
292:
289:
284:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:redirects to
259:
255:
254:
253:
250:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
231:
230:
228:
224:
223:
222:
219:
215:
210:
209:
208:
205:
201:
200:
199:
196:
192:
189:
187:
184:
179:
178:
177:
174:
170:
167:redirect was
166:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
152:
144:
140:
139:
137:
133:
130:
129:
123:
116:
112:
109:
106:
105:
101:
100:
97:
93:
90:
87:
83:
78:
75:
71:
67:
60:
56:
53:
48:
41:
36:
23:
19:
380:
379:
367:
355:
344:
340:
322:
321:
288:Curtis Clark
195:Curtis Clark
190:
165:Infraspecies
148:
143:Infraspecies
127:
122:no consensus
121:
103:
102:
79:
65:
274:Chick Bowen
218:Chick Bowen
173:Chick Bowen
155:Chick Bowen
359:fmeneguzzi
258:Infraclass
298:KP Botany
249:KP Botany
239:KP Botany
226:taxonomy.
204:KP Botany
183:KP Botany
372:Aarktica
264:, while
96:GabrielF
20: |
334:FAB 001
330:FAB Uno
74:RockMFR
49:June 30
35:June 29
368:Delete
341:delete
191:Delete
132:scribe
40:July 1
214:breed
141:Also
43:: -->
16:<
32:<
128:WjB
68:by
22:Log
349:13
346:Sr
343:.
332:→
113:→
88:,
57:→
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.