Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 11

1536:. However, there's no evidence that it is being used, and several reasons to believe that it is not. Chief among those being that the user seems to have left Knowledge (XXG) and that the redirect is broken (ie: broken redirects can't be used, by definition). Therefore, with no evidence of a tangible benefit to Knowledge (XXG), and a specific cost that has been brought forward, the CBA favors deletion. I do agree that if the redirect is being used in any way, it would swing the other way in favor of keeping it. To mitigate that, I think it's fair to leave a note for the user in case they come back saying that they are more than welcome to recreate the redirect or 1628:, but there is disagreement about whether there is sufficient information at the target to make a redirect useful, and neither side has made a more convincing argument than the other. So that brings us to no consensus, which normally defaults to keep but nobody here support the status quo, so that really wouldn't be ideal. Retargetting is a softer option than deletion, and deletion without consensus to do so should require exceptional circumstances that I don't see here, so I'll go with a retarget to 3473:. NEO points to a section titled "the dictionary definition trap" about article content: surely pointing readers looking for a dictionary definition to Wiktionary solves this problem. CNR is solved by soft-redirection. Several of the delete arguments also suggested that the redirect should be kept if there was information about it in an article, but there is information at Thryduulf's Wiktionary entry which seems to invalidate these arguments. 4032:"Non-notable neologism" (although a word that is over 17 years old is stretching the definition of "neologism" a bit) is a reason for their not to be a Knowledge (XXG) article, but not a reason why the many people searching for it should be faced with (directly or after a few clicks) search results which wont help them rather than a direct link to content at Wiktionary explicitly about the term they are looking for. 6585: 1448:. The user in question seems to have left Knowledge (XXG), so the likelihood of them needing it again is infinitesimal. However, the likelihood of it cluttering maintenance lists like those I linked earlier are high, much higher than any future benefit. Because of that, I say delete and if the user comes back and needs it again, I'd have no problem with them recreating it. -- 1789:

and surface drainage is moderate to rapid. Outcrops of red beds, geologic materials, and associated reddish soils have led some scientists to use the name “Red Plains.” Limestone underlies the soils in the southeastern part. The eastern part contains large areas of badlands." It doesn't make sense to point to a highway system unless the highway is named as such.

3717:, an entry I've just created. Per Andrewa there are links that will be broken if this is deleted but there is no mention of it on either the MOS page or article so neither will help someone looking to see what this is. The Wiktionary entry (which meets the criteria for inclusion there) will help people following the links and anyone else who searches for this. 2552: 1780: 1783: 1752:. Some Web searches have convinced me that "Red Plains" is sometimes used as an alternate name of the "Rolling Plains", which in turn are that portion of the Osage that extends into Texas. That makes this a barely plausible search term. However, the region is barely discussed at the target, and the more plausible 5051:

There may be dozens or hundreds of airports with "National Airport" as part of their name, but as far as I know, only one airport is referred to simply as "National Airport", and that is Washington National. Add a hatnote to the top of that article that "National Airport" redirects there and to see a

4065:

page said that the term wasn't just about the recency of a word, that it could even apply to words that had been around for 50 years. It was more about its level of adoption. Now, did that have a good reference, was it original research? I don't know. But I think it's fair to call "apostrophectomy" a

3857:

No, this is being used - 134 times in 2016, many clustered at the end of March, presumably correlating with some usage external to Knowledge (XXG), demonstrating that people do search for this. It is not possible to correlate the number of people searching for something with the number of google hits

2682:

My opinion (which others might not agree with) is that in cases like this inclusion on a disambiguation page is a lower bar than having a mention in an article – if it were included in the target, then all the other settlements in the district would have to be listed as well to avoid making it appear

2192:

as the general topic. I'm not supportive of the status quo as the terms aren't synonymous. I think there's less likelihood of astonishment by a redirect to sex over BDSM. I don't buy the "expand into an article" idea. I'd be surprised if there's enough coverage for an article here, and perhaps having

4516:

I am not proposing the redirect be left as is, I agree that the status quo is not suitable. I have not taken any unilateral action to restore the article as this discussion is still open, and before your most recent comment nobody else had actually expressed an opinion on the proposal. My taking any

3937:

are three or more "durably archived" independent uses of the term spanning at least one year. This is very significantly lower than Knowledge (XXG)'s inclusion standards, and as this is a rather informal term I think a requirement for it to appear in the article (which is generally written in a more

1788:

which quotes "The Rolling Plains include 21.7 million acres east of the High Plains in northwestern Texas. The area lies west of the North Central Prairies and extends from the edge of the Edwards Plateau in Tom Green County northward into Oklahoma. The landscape is nearly level to strongly rolling,

5684:

with redirects from "Edged weapons" and "Blade(d) weapons". The article would essentially be a disambiguation page, although, I suggest it might be more appropriate for it to be written as a prose article (with multiple links) along the lines of the ideas I have identified, rather than as the more

5163:

Reagan is the only one commonly called "National Airport", both historically speaking before Reagan's name was added, and still today to some extent, especially by locals unhappy with the name change to honor a locally unpopular President. I can tell you from experience that even today, most locals

3836:

The only reason for not deleting this would be its use in Andrewa's edit summaries for the past year or so (how many are there of these?). Keeping targeted to the manual of style is sensible, despite the CNR issues, as that's the intended target in these edit summaries. As the term has only a few

1531:

That argument works both ways. I fail to see how keeping this redirect will benefit the encyclopedia. The only arguments brought forward for keeping it has been broad terms like "harmless" and "I don't see the benefit to deletion". On the other hand, I have provided a specific cost to keeping the

3612:

No big deal... it will break the links mentioned, pointlessly IMO as I really don't see the harm it does... and as I pointed out above, nom is based on an essay, not any official guideline or policy. I found it useful in building the encyclopedia, otherwise I would not have created it. But if it

823:- I have an exceptionally difficult time imagining anyone would search for these to begin with, more so that someone would search for an obscure file name when they're actually looking for iconic musical works, and that they were buried deep within Windows isn't a valid argument to the contrary. 5956:. I don't see anything worth preserving in the history – the page was created with a translation of the corresponding Romanian article, which, given the bizarre curiosity of the fact of the translation, it is conceivable to think of preserving, yet I don't see it as anywhere bizarre enough. – 1010: 4461:

article? If you can't get it done now then withdraw your objection to deleting the Canters redirect. You can always create an article with that name when you get around to it but you can't leave the redirect as it is because it implies that Canters and Jantzen are the same person or somehow

1075:

The term overwhelmingly refers to film distribution, but I guess it could in theory also describe distribution (which happens to be worldwide) of other media and the like. Creating a separate page that links to all the possible search targets is best. Second choice would be redirect to

1006: 3669:

I repeat, no big deal. If deleted it will just make my existing edit summaries useless (and I can't change them now), and future edit summaries a few characters longer, but I can easily set up a shortcut in the project namespace, where in hindsight it really belongs.

2948: 4517:

action in these circumstances would not be appropriate. The reasoning for my suggestion is that the article has never had consensus for deletion, and I am always very reluctant to delete an article at RfD as it is simply the wrong venue for such discussions.

1424:

Personal user lists like that do not carry much weight in my opinion, and certainly not enough to justify deletion, as anyone may create any list with any (or no) criteria. Certainly for Godsy's list simply excluding userspace will resolve most of the list.

5938:

There's not anything special about Romanian or Italian nails that would justify this foreign-language redirect. (At least, not that I'm aware of.) I'd've speedied it A10 if I'd seen it at creation, but it's been hanging around for almost a year now.

1516:

I don't believe such redirects have ever worked, but I still fail to understand how deletion will benefit the encyclopaedia here, and how one person's overly broad personal cleanup list can justify deleting something in a another users' userspace?

1269:. The redirect is clearly broken, but so far everyone who has commented has suggested a different solution to that problem. As a matter of maintenance, I am updating the redirect to point to what is clearly intended to be the correct target. 1372:("Special:RecentChangesLinked?target=Category:India" works in URLs but apparently not in links), so we should either fix it for the user (who may still be around as a reader and/or come back in future) or leave it be as completely harmless. 1623:

default to retarget. After more than a month at RfD and two relistings it seems rather unlikley that further opinions are going to be rapidly forthcoming on this one. It's clear that there is a connection between "Red plains" in Texas and

5070:. Looking more closely at the google results, it seems that the airport serving Washington DC is the primary topic. The set index/dab should be hatnoted from the target though as there are others that are referred to in this manner. 4764:, this term was commonly used, including this variant without a space. Because this lack of space may not have been correct (at least that may have been the case in English), I have added the following redirect-template - 4920:. There's overwhelming consensus that the DC airport is the primary topic. I advise that if a disambiguation/set index is to be pursued, be sure that other airports are actually known as "National Airport" and aren't 2139:

The term is rather vague. I don't know that such an article could consist of much more than a dictionary definition; unless the term has a notable usage, it isn't different than other adjective preceding "sex", e.g.

5612:

I think a move would be reasonable. The only thing I can think of is maybe it's meant to distinguish between weapons used for fighting other groups of people (i.e. one of the meanings of combat) from those used for

2556: 3352: 6446: 2643:(not sure how reliable), and although it is not given as a variant of "Makri", it has virtually the same coordinates. So it's most probably an alternative name. In this case it seems most appropriate to 4537:"I am not proposing the redirect be left as is, I agree that the status quo is not suitable." -- CORRECT. SO? Delete this pestilent redirect and create an article at your leisure. What is the big deal? 1295: 730:

Okay... But that doesn't explain why these would be plausible as redirects. As far as I can tell, that dictionary isn't even notable, so it's not like there's anywhere that discusses these files. --

644: 5672:

Not all bladed or edged weapons are premodern. Bayonets knives and machetes persist in the modern era as do other edged weapons (some improvised) particularly but not limited to trench warfare.

2353:

a valid search, but it will vary tremendously depending on the reader. The "roughness" of sex is extremely highly subjective: for some individuals all sex is rough, for others no sex is rough

444: 6338: 6314: 3396: 5730:

I copyedited it slightly and added some wikilinks. It would need some sourcing; if titled "Edged and bladed weapons", it would at least need a source defining edge and blade weapons.

124: 39: 34: 3904:

I'm going to make this official. I don't really know Wiktionary's inclusion standards, but I suspect if the word is good enough for them, it's good enough for us to mention in

6592: 2071: 564: 244: 164: 2045:), they usually do discuss it in the context of BDSM. It can refer to different types of sexual activity (not just intercourse). The term could redirect to a section in the 5164:

call it "National" or "National Airport", not "Reagan Airport". No objection to creating a disambig page with a hatnote if someone wants to, but this is the primary topic.

773:

on Knowledge (XXG). Redirects exist to help people find information on what they're looking for. Those two redirects you mention do that. The ones I've nominated do not. --

5439:, which has a bad title (many examples are not "premodern") but is otherwise a useful article. Definitely don't delete any of these, as they are all useful search terms. 5498:

is about the sharp bit of things that are not all weapons. The list looks more useful to a searcher than Blade#Uses. I've added a link to the List to See also of Blade.

404: 90:. There is a clear consensus to delete the unabbreviated ones. The abbreviated ones are a closer call, but ultimately I find the arguments for deleting them stronger. 6105:

per nom. Not notable. Brand was around when he was president though, but without any mentions of the product or the president on either article, this is synthesis.

4126:- while redirects are inexpensive, some are just plain cheap. The latter are not cost effective, even at the low price; especially when they are hardly used anyway. 3662:

This redirect is a redirect to the MOS, and is not just potentially useful, it is in use as explained above, and it has existed for two years... perhaps not really

3387:

Should be deleted. This seems to have been a routine arrest rather than what was reported in places, there is no mention of the redirect subject on the list, and a

2819:

the consensus in this discussion seems to be that disambiguation should be primary, but this can obviously be discussed on the talk page in future if anyone wants.

3653:

Some long-standing cross-namespace redirects are also kept because of their long-standing history and potential usefulness. "MOS:" redirects, for example, are an

2723:, populated places are notable and Uanfala provided evidence of its existence. If the article needs to be moved to a more correct name, I wouldn't oppose that. -- 1307: 3392: 2487:) 21:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Actually I don't know if it should be here or at articles for deletion because it used to be an article but not a very good one. 4015: 933: 6513: 3645:

I think that strictly speaking that claim is false, but let us not play with words. That new link to a guideline is certainly relevant, thank you for it.

1369: 6992:. All my external searches are to the primary school. It is absolutely definetly the Welsh transiteration of this name, but we haven't much RS on it. 4948: 3099: 2958:

and so on. It also has its own entry in the concise Kindle version of the Oxford English Dictionary, showing the term is in common use in English. --

21: 3148:

somewhere for it to be included. Uanfala mentions a great candidate to do so, but I'll defer to the art history editors. 18:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

1504:

technical deletion. A courtesy notice about its deletion would suffice. Anyway, Tavix pointed out that the user seems to have left Knowledge (XXG).

6841:. Not everyone owns a Czechoslovakian keyboard to type the correct diacritics. Also, nom is not making sense at all; did you take your medicine? -- 5675:

A redirect to premodern weapons is not specific since many are not bladed or edged. It may be better to link to specific headings within the list.

6520:. He/she tried to create another Nguyễn Thị Sen (wife of Emperor Đinh Bộ Lĩnh) but he can't actualize that page because that title already exist. 3593:(not redirect). I removed it from the proposed target page. It was added to that page today, sourced to Urban Dictionary. Not a reliable source 2049:

article, if reliable sources are gathered for it, but mention of BDSM would still be in that section. I'll post a note about this discussion at

4960: 3564:

which is why it shows no incoming links, and deleting it will break these links. But I certainly agree it's not ideal as is (while noting that

2502: 1672: 3573: 4269: 3509: 17: 6052: 5818:

has been created. Can the three terms be redirected to this new page please. Further contribution to this new page is more than welcome.

7017:

I am not sure. To be clar, the article lists the vilage, but all external searches I get are for the school. 00:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

6212: 5440: 5411: 5313: 4807: 3404: 1761: 1330:

Redirect to a non-existent target, seemingly invalid target. Nothing besides this in the page history. User has not edited since 2015.

5572: 5357: 5271: 3992: 2303: 2107: 1500:. That redirect syntax probably worked when it was originally created in 2004. But it doesn't work anymore. So this should fall under 1389:. Unless redirects like this add clutter to some maintenance list, I don't really see any benefit in trying to do anything with it. – 987:

I suggest writing a short article. It's a term most commonly used in filming though, so keeping the current redirect is fine as well.

604: 524: 484: 364: 324: 284: 204: 5032:, which may be a good place to start from. I stopped pursuing that because of the large number of airports named "National Airport". 2668:

Would you be able to fix the "not mentioned at target" issue? Or do you think it should be kept regardless, since it's a real place?

6800: 4668: 1532:

redirect moving forward. If we're conducting a cost-benefit analysis (CBA), the only benefit I can come up with is personal use for

3006:

suggests there shouldn't be a disambiguation page with two listings, but neither should point to a location in the article where a

2318:

as that article is about the altogether unrelated biological topic. The relevant generic article (and an eligible target) would be

5584: 5491: 5436: 5345: 5301: 3479: 3364: 2935: 2363: 1275: 472: 432: 638: 7040: 6665: 6552: 6118: 5135: 3824: 3208:

I almost closed this, but while closing, I noticed that in the discussion, there seems to be a claim that the reference to the

3106:

redirects to an article where the typeface is just an entry in a very long list of typefaces with no other content about it. –

2853: 2529: 1991: 1802: 1209: 1158: 811: 438: 3934: 3866:

gets 70 million, and I strongly suspect that in the past month the former has received far more search interest (backed up by

3597:. A google search turned up 1k hits for the word, limited to forums and other similar usage. It's an insignificant neologism. 5058: 4766: 3400: 1089: 6440: 5709:

Suggested page - though largely unformatted. Needs links added. I don't think this needs a lot of (or any) referencing per

118: 627: 427: 5784: 5552: 5088: 4848: 4560: 4088: 3735: 3197: 3032: 2741: 2590: 2259: 2092: 1879: 1817: 1466: 1103: 6957: 5915: 3837:

hundred google hits, it's extremely unlikely to be searched for by users, and hence one of the necessary conditions for

2456: 2070:. This probably shouldn't be deleted, but I don't know exactly where it should point at the moment. I've left a note at 6908: 6751: 6618: 6509: 6429: 6399: 6165: 6001: 5868: 5214: 5117: 5013:

is better than a disambiguation page, but I agree with you that the airport in Washington DC is not the primary topic.

4984: 4907: 4619: 4225:

created as the result of a page move. That being said, I've carried out a suggestion put forward in this discussion to

4179: 3497: 3448: 3317: 3213: 2806: 2409: 1944: 1610: 1256: 876: 558: 238: 158: 107: 77: 6494: 6079: 5739: 5666:

Not all edged weapons are blades. Edged weapons are a larger set that includes axes, poleaxes and other edged weapons.

5638: 5533: 5470: 5389: 4782: 4403:

would remain unchanged. It is possible for an admin to split the versions about Canters from those about Jantzen (see

3163: 2931: 2564: 2161: 2023: 1835: 1760:

are both redlinked, so it may be better not to get readers' hopes up. In any case, the current target makes no sense.

1361: 1343: 927: 893:. Other than "don't keep it as is", there really isn't much of a consensus here. However, it seems like a retarget to 398: 7046: 7001: 6930: 6867: 6850: 6832: 6773: 6710: 6697: 6640: 6558: 6529: 6502: 6421: 6356: 6332: 6305: 6288: 6244: 6187: 6124: 6096: 6027: 5960: 5943: 5890: 5827: 5807: 5761: 5747: 5725: 5699: 5646: 5600: 5576: 5541: 5507: 5478: 5448: 5419: 5397: 5380:

These should point to the same place. Is there a more appropriate target that describes bladed weapons in general?

5244: 5173: 5153: 5139: 5106: 5079: 5062: 5043: 5022: 5002: 4933: 4866: 4837: 4815: 4794: 4748: 4721: 4702: 4641: 4578: 4547: 4526: 4497: 4472: 4443: 4416: 4390: 4372: 4358: 4330: 4308: 4242: 4205: 4138: 4117: 4075: 4055: 4041: 4019: 3996: 3978: 3947: 3921: 3892: 3879: 3845: 3828: 3807: 3788: 3759: 3726: 3697: 3679: 3640: 3622: 3606: 3585: 3548: 3484: 3408: 3339: 3276: 3238: 3217: 3188: 3179: 3122: 3110: 3090: 3081:. The term is common in art history. There is no better target at present. A stub article could easily be created. 3073: 3054: 3023: 2991: 2967: 2939: 2914: 2891: 2828: 2765: 2732: 2705: 2701: 2687: 2677: 2673: 2663: 2632: 2628: 2608: 2581: 2568: 2535: 2506: 2498: 2484: 2431: 2368: 2341: 2326: 2307: 2283: 2246: 2228: 2202: 2169: 2130: 2111: 2083: 2062: 2031: 1966: 1903: 1870: 1843: 1808: 1769: 1732: 1707: 1645: 1567: 1549: 1526: 1511: 1490: 1457: 1434: 1419: 1393: 1381: 1351: 1301: 1280: 1215: 1189: 1162: 1127: 1094: 1067: 1046: 1022: 996: 981: 906: 835: 815: 782: 764: 739: 721: 689: 676: 232: 192: 99: 2621: 2041:

on the topic...under that specific name. And when quality sources do discuss rough sex (meaning by using the term

547: 227: 147: 3784: 1660: 3688:

redirects with the "MOS:" prefix. Because there is not a MOS namespace, those shortcuts are technically CNRs. --

3561: 6301: 5815: 5681: 5588: 5228: 4538: 4512: 4488: 4463: 4434: 4381: 4349: 4299: 2656: 2544: 2058: 552: 512: 387: 2947:

The term is used in English for the 19th century in Italy, especially in works on art history, e.g. this book

1173: 956:

The scope of the current target is too narrow for the broad term "worldwide distribution". The page should be

6434: 5752:

I don't have sources but they may exist in existing articles. Will have a look. But it is a good foundation?

1176:

not to refer to any specific article. Same with worldwide sales, worldwide shipping. Otherwise, retarget to

1145:

as that's the general article about managing the flow of goods. Would also accept Jonpatterns' suggestion of

5823: 5757: 5721: 5695: 5618: 5503: 5444: 5415: 5029: 4811: 4712:

50 last year). Looking on google it's the name of a non-notable linux game, and a non-notable air purifier.

4296: 3388: 3069: 1765: 1407: 1185: 6860: 6688:(Eubot) This redirects to a surname page. Neither of them listed have this name. Not Germanic but Turkish. 5123: 3151: 3145: 2697: 2669: 2624: 2574: 2494: 2490: 2480: 1403: 3020: 2988: 2910: 2888: 2560: 824: 6046: 4404: 4226: 6904: 6846: 6747: 6614: 6395: 6206: 6161: 5997: 5864: 5210: 5169: 4954: 4903: 4615: 4380:: I don't understand, I'm afraid. Right now Canters is a direct redirect to Jantzen. This can't stand. 4175: 3444: 3313: 2802: 2405: 2338: 2319: 2212: 2188: 2046: 1940: 1666: 1606: 1564: 1508: 1252: 1063: 872: 632: 592: 73: 5953: 2923: 598: 518: 478: 358: 318: 278: 198: 3002:. Neither "19th century in Italy" or the typeface is sufficiently common to indicate a primary use. 6525: 4263: 4214: 4193: 4134: 3776: 3503: 3358: 3103: 2444: 760: 717: 6788: 6659: 6517: 6035: 5660:

Blade(d) weapons are swords, knives and bayonets but not all swords, knives and bayonets are bladed.

4487:

per reasons above. Delete the redirect and just close this thing out. It's not a complicated issue.

3003: 2876:

Knowledge (XXG) is not a foreign language dictionary, and there is no strong connection between the

2720: 1985: 1757: 53:

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 11, 2017.

7034: 6997: 6828: 6693: 6546: 6352: 6328: 6297: 6284: 6195: 6112: 5131: 5075: 5018: 4833: 4717: 4522: 4412: 4368: 4326: 4113: 4037: 3974: 3943: 3875: 3820: 3755: 3722: 3234: 3064:- "Ottocento" is frequently used in English art history to denote the 19th century in Italian art. 2824: 2761: 2523: 2427: 2279: 2079: 2054: 1899: 1863: 1796: 1782:

and this one which says Rolling Plains is the same as Red Plains and lists the counties affected.

1641: 1522: 1486: 1430: 1377: 1364:) but they can be useful. In this case the page the user desires is the list of changes related to 1203: 1154: 1123: 1018: 977: 807: 95: 6470: 2149: 1537: 587: 507: 467: 347: 307: 267: 187: 5909: 5819: 5753: 5717: 5691: 5622: 5499: 5307: 5232: 5038: 4997: 4656: 3102:

might not be a more suitable target. I'm not entirely sure disambiguation is a very good idea as

3065: 2963: 2648: 2479:

It's a spelling mistake, and even the correct spelling doesn't seem to be in the target article.

2126: 2014:

Ungentle intercourse isn't synonymous with BDSM. The redirect has some history that is quite old.

1180:

and let the person using the link figure out what particular distribution they want whether it's

1086: 5669:

Sythes etc are tools that are bladed and/or edged, that have been used as improvised as weapons.

3569: 3347: 2141: 1753: 6648: 4099:

Discussion seems to still be ongoing, so relisting in the hopes that consensus becomes clearer.

2121:

We don't have an article or section that covers this. It should be expanded into an article. --

1974: 6988:

Wikpedia. The R goes to the village which goes to the little primary school, so that is a bit

6864: 6707: 6258: 6200: 5957: 5567: 5351: 5265: 5150: 4734: 4052: 4009: 3987: 3889: 3842: 3675: 3618: 3581: 3273: 3185: 3119: 3107: 3017: 3010: 2985: 2885: 2684: 2660: 2578: 2323: 2298: 2145: 2102: 1390: 1181: 1077: 1035: 272: 152: 6903:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

6746:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

6613:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

6394:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

6160:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

5996:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

5863:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

5710: 5209:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4902:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4614:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

4174:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

3443:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

3312:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

2801:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

2516:, not mentioned at target. Sending the district article to AFD would be a different process. 2404:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1939:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1605:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

1251:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

871:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

72:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

6842: 6823:(eubot) Very slight doubt this would be taken as "Senior" which it is not. But probably OK. 6794: 6240: 5898: 5521: 5165: 4662: 2977: 2973: 2881: 2357:. BDSM isn't something that happens when a certain threshold of "roughness" is met, either. 2335: 1561: 1505: 1193: 1059: 965: 770: 4921: 4230: 3594: 3565: 3539:. Someone searching this concept would be surprised or confused to end up at a MoS page. -- 3536: 3470: 3466: 1331: 6521: 6263: 6040: 4458: 4396: 4252: 4130: 3714: 3602: 3492: 3474: 3462: 3159: 3098:. The current target doesn't seem to have any Italy-specific content, so I'm wondering if 3086: 2358: 1270: 992: 756: 713: 686: 7027:

searches looks like they go to locales in Wenvoe anyway, like the school or some stores.

4218: 1786: 1501: 5767: 2038: 7028: 6993: 6824: 6689: 6540: 6342: 6318: 6274: 6106: 5903: 5614: 5146: 5127: 5071: 5014: 4829: 4790: 4775: 4728: 4713: 4518: 4480: 4454: 4408: 4377: 4364: 4322: 4103: 4033: 3971: 3939: 3871: 3816: 3745: 3718: 3224: 3048: 2907: 2847: 2820: 2751: 2517: 2423: 2269: 2075: 1889: 1856: 1790: 1637: 1633: 1518: 1476: 1426: 1373: 1365: 1197: 1150: 1113: 1014: 973: 803: 312: 112: 91: 6989: 4737:. But those statistics do not show that people are actually looking for the target. - 3648: 3628: 6269: 6087: 5596: 5053: 5033: 4992: 4739: 4693: 4400: 4257: 4201: 4071: 3917: 3803: 3769:

per Thryduulf. This is a fair search term; some readers will be looking for it as a

3175: 2959: 2122: 1962: 1533: 1081: 961: 5716:

Hope this is a help and a start. Rome wasn't built in a day and not by one person.

6015: 5940: 5432: 5407: 4295:

with no direct connection to target article and is confusing. Was once an article (

4127: 4048: 4027: 4005: 3867: 3852: 3671: 3614: 3577: 3261: 3209: 2951: 2877: 2841: 2216: 1745: 1720: 1629: 1625: 1177: 1146: 1055: 1040: 894: 890: 752: 702: 6969: 6812: 6677: 6516:

should be removed because there is no redirect to that page. That page created by

6458: 6224: 6064: 5927: 5369: 5325: 5283: 4972: 4680: 4281: 3521: 3376: 3170:

I would prefer to see a draft disambiguation page before passing judgment here. --

2865: 2468: 2003: 1684: 1319: 945: 656: 616: 576: 536: 496: 456: 416: 392: 376: 352: 336: 296: 256: 216: 176: 136: 667:

Appears to be a file, but neither these redirects nor their targets are files. --

6951: 6653: 6236: 3838: 3770: 3265: 2955: 2450: 2622:

http://www.mapsofindia.com/villages/uttar-pradesh/bulandshahar/siana/makri.html

6922: 6765: 6632: 6488: 6413: 6179: 6019: 5882: 5799: 5733: 5632: 5527: 5464: 5383: 5236: 5098: 4925: 4858: 4633: 4570: 4234: 3966: 3958: 3905: 3795: 3689: 3632: 3598: 3557: 3540: 3331: 3249: 3155: 3133: 3082: 2981: 2724: 2600: 2238: 2220: 2194: 2155: 2074:

inviting comment, so hopefully that and Flyer22's note will bring some ideas.

2017: 1829: 1724: 1699: 1541: 1449: 1411: 1337: 988: 898: 774: 748: 731: 698: 668: 5795:

since discussion is still ongoing, I'm hoping another relist will be fruitful

1560:

with correct link syntax if this is more acceptable to others than deletion.

6315:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 December 24#Kenny W. James

5626: 4825: 4821: 4786: 4771: 4062: 3253: 3043: 2901: 2836: 2050: 1142: 7010: 6296:

unless the article is improved to include something about the voice actor.

5663:

Not all blades are weapons. Not all blades are swords, knives and bayonets.

3141: 6897:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

6740:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

6607:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

6388:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

6339:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 December 24#Eric Newsome

6178:. It seems to be unanimous. Do let me know if it isn't and I'll relist. -- 6154:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5990:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5857:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5203:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4896:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4806:

As viruses are not just a computer topic, they exist in nature as well --

4608:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

4168:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

3437:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

3306:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

2795:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

2683:

as this particular place is the only (or the most important) one there. –

2398:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1933:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1599:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

1245:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

865:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

66:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.

5607: 5592: 5517: 4761: 4197: 4067: 3928: 3913: 3799: 3794:

I would much rather see information about this neologism included at the

3269: 3257: 3245: 3171: 1958: 897:

would satisfy the most people here, so that's where it's going to go. --

6254: 4229:

Hanneke Canters from Grace Jantzen. This is without predjudice against

7060:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6881:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6724:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6572:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6372:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6138:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

5974:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

5841:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

5187:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

4880:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

4592:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

4152:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3421:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3290:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2779:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2696:

in the light of this evidence? Deletion doesn't look to be necessary.

2651:(to preserve the relevant history, as the place is notable), and make 2382:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1917:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1583:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1229:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

849:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6945: 6706:. Nothing comes up on web search that is not related to wikipedia. – 2652: 2439: 7054: