1858:
completely ignores the ACTUAL issue which is efficiency vs longevity (without even factoring initial cost). When making a light bulb, there's no free lunch! It's SIMPLE to make a lightbulb that runs 100 years, get a 1000W rated lightbulb and run 100W through it, you'll probably get as much light as a 20W lighbulb (if that) but it will last for ages! And if it's not obvious, you'll be paying for 100W. When lighbubs were first mass produced, every company had their own idea of what the ideal "ratio" of efficiency vs longevity was, all that happened is they got together and made a STANDARD. The result is when you buy a 100W light bulb you didn't have to worry whether you buy it from company A or company B.. WHOA, those greedy assholes! Do you really think there isn't a single cheap chinese knock off company that wouldn't bat an eye lid at undercutting "big lightbulb" companies by making lighbulbs that last 100 years if it was that simple?? /soapbox
318:
rewrite any program by replacing the gotos with the above three control statements; the point being that goto does not add any additional expressibility. However, it seems that there is an underlying assumption that the original unstructured language is already Turing
Complete; indeed, it's not hard to imagine a nonTuring Complete langauge that has these three structures. For example, suppose that you are only allowed to recieve a single input at the start of execution and from there you can only increment variables by +1, declare variables larger than the current largest, compare for equality, the above control structures, and exit returning a given variable; then no program can return a value larger than its input, obviously, this is not complete.
1824:
re-badged economy model ? Which market is it for ? Indonesia, India ? if it breaks down it will be repaired for sure, so the only thing failure will do is prevent new sales by damaging the products reputation and you just won't get any advantage in increased new sales regardless of failure rates as it will be repaired by the customer. The United kingdom ? pick a cap that will last the warranty period because it's at the budget end of the market, labour cost in the UK is too high to allow repair of the set, so the customer will replace the set with a new one and you make more profit, you balance warranty returns against the customers willingness to blame 'cheap
Chinese garbage' rather than anything related to the manufacture.
1667:
made cheap and not made to last because that results in the lowest cost and the highest turn over. YES you can argue that it is wasteful and that "hidden costs" like pollution, waste and natural resources are NOT paid for but have a "cost", I completely agree with that, but that's NOT what planned obsolesence is. The very idea (and the recent documentary which I suspect you watched) completely ignores the OTHER sides of the story, i.e. cost vs benefit, you can't have your cake and eat it too: If everyone was buying $ 5000 computers every 10 years instead of $ 1000 computers every 2, we'd probably barely have pentium processors by now. I maintain that planned obsolesence has nothing to do with why the OPs video card failed.
1134:, which can show you a ton of temperature readings from the CPU, various heatsinks, etc., to help diagnose the issue) and the speed of the fan. Look at it when the computer is running slow. What does it say the CPU is? If it's significantly upwards of 80ÂșC, and the fan is not roaring (and even if it is, potentially), the physical damage in question may have damaged the cooling equipment in some way, and that could be causing the issues. The solution there is not to try and run it in a cooler environment but to have someone take it apart and fix the cooling system â if you don't do that, you can easily cause irreparable harm to the processor. --
1547:, it has really nothing to do with the question here. It's pure speculation whether there was any "planning". As with ANY product, it's a cost vs. benefit/risk evaluation. I find it very hard to believe the video card manufacturer intentionally planned to put in capacitors so they would fail in a few years. The far more likely scenario is they used components which were cheaper because the vast majority of people won't pay MORE money for computer components even if they know they will last a few years longer. Some may argue that's almost the same thing, but I don't buy it. Any product can be made
1895:
will do just fine. Sure, there are people who are bugged by them or are unhappy or whatever, but for <$ 10 a month, they provide a lot of options, a lot of bandwidth, a lot of space, and they host huge numbers of sites, so they can't be all bad. (I've used BH for years and never had a significant complaint; the only area I ever run into any difficulty is with processor throttling when running scripts, but it basically does that silently and it doesn't seem to affect very much on my sites.) If you are really going for bare-bones, there are cheaper schemes (e.g.
1831:, which have burned for more than 100 years. Get a gun, and every customer that comes into your light bulb shop, sell them a lightbulb and then blow them away. That way, you'll never get another dime out of them. Same as selling a lightbulb that lasts 100 years. Do you think that company got repeat business ? The entire industry came up with different ideas for how long to make a lightbulb last until they finally reached a consensus that 1,000 hours was the best balance between robbing the customer of the most money possible without them complaining too much.
832:"Blown" is widely understood to mean "suffered some unspecified permanent physical damage that causes either distortion or complete nonfunction". From a bit of research, overpowering will commonly blow bass cones -- the situation Dbfirs describes above -- and underpowering will cause clipping which can damage the voice coil because of the heat generated. Underpowering seems to more commonly damage tweeters. I seriously doubt that this is some kind of urban legend, googling on any related phrase turns up thousands of non-forum references to this phenomenon.
222:
website; and some sites like JSTOR charge for access to works that are so old that they're in the public domain. But I don't know of anything that does this. Most of the popular plugins for accessing/searching/managing journals are created by universities (examples are LibX and Zotero) and they wouldn't have much incentive to do this. As already mentioned, you could search google for the article title or author, but maybe it's not trivial to automate that process. --
679:
conclusion was that the amp is underpowered relative to the speakers. I read that as a rule of thumb you want around 2x the rated output to ensure the speakers aren't underpowered, so I would need an amp providing around 50W @ 8Ohm for these speakers. Conversely, as long as I keep this amp, I would need to use speakers rated at around 40W at 6Ohm or 30W at 8Ohm.
1552:
and they failed, I work in IT and I witness components fail all the time, it happens, it's the nature of life, things wear out. In the case of computer components, it's cheaper to replace the few faulty ones then to manufacture ALL of them to be less susceptible to failure. That's the answer to the question, no need to invoke conspiracy theories.
457:
1713:
My education is somewhat broader than any recent doco, which I haven't seen, and am not interested in to tell the truth. But hey ! rather than drag into an argument with a person who understands the subject with such confidence, I'll just say you are right, I am wrong, and any capitalist who suggests
1779:
plan obsolesence into my own design? Proposing a theory that says every burned out capacitor is the fault of our over indulgent consumerist lifestyle doesn't explain why a video card failed. In fact your reaction, the sort of "faux-indignation" basically accuses ME of presenting a false dichotomy, I
1505:
where an item is designed to destroy itself so that you must purchase another one, which you have done. Repair of the display card would have been possible if it was not disposed of. The best defence is education, to study the kinds of cards available and their reputation is most people's first line
678:
Now from reading forums, I got the impression that the danger is not in having too *high* an output from the amp, but rather too low an output. So although this looks like too much power for the 70W continuous power the speakers are rated at, it actually is possibly too little for the peaks. So my
1894:
In a sense you do get what you pay for, unless you overpay. (I have never seen a reason to pay a lot for domain registry, in any case, and the higher-priced ones there just seem to be taking advantage of the ignorant.) If you are just looking for something middle of the road, Dreamhost and
Bluehost
1857:
See you're doing it again. "greedy capitalist scum school"Â ? lol. Dude, that's some chip on your shoulder... You're going to bring up the light bulb thing?? And precisely as I said, you reduce it to a dichotomy: Either we get lightbulbs which last 100 years or lighbulb companies are greedy scum! It
1666:
I'm not
American and I still call bullshit. We're not talking about a car that can still drive on a freeway whether it is 1 year old or 10 years old, we're talking about computers where a 10 year old computer is practically a museum piece. I dispute that it is a mainstream business model, stuff is
1578:
way to fuel a national economy, rather than the United states consumerist approach. If I wanted to stay away from the appearance of conspiracy theory I would avoid looking at regimes that focus on enslavement of a population itself as the best foundation for an economy, because of the sound of that.
1577:
is a mainstream business model which itself is fought over by 'theorist groups' which have schools of thought about whether there is a need to destroy the planet in order to make money. Personally I lean towards the German parliamentary position whereby saving the environment is the most profitable
801:
The only speakers that I've ever "blown" were the old-fashioned variety with compressed cardboard cones, and these could be physically torn (producing a distorted sound) by putting bass through them at too high a volume. This was quite common in the sixties when playing sixties music through hi-fi
317:
My understanding of the theorem is this: imagine a program in flowchart form, that program can be replaced by a flowchart that is structured only by the three rules that they give. Essentially, any type of "flow" can be gotten using a goto, so you could, basically, look at it by saying that you can
269:
not to do people's homework for them, but to merely aid them in doing it themselves. Letting someone else do your homework does not help you learn nearly as much as doing it yourself. Please attempt to solve the problem or answer the question yourself first. If you need help with a specific part of
1606:
are a monument to it. Considering most editors are from the US, there can't be any shortage of reputable RS on the matter. You will find it explained in the simplest terms no doubt such as "Why sell one item for USD$ 10 every 50 years, when you can sell one every 5 years for USD$ 100 total, that's
1551:
by using only the highest quality components, but what you end up with is a product that costs several times as much and will probably, as you correctly note, be obsolete in 2 years anyway. And even THEN you are not absolutely guaranteed it won't fail... Some cheap caps were used in the video card
1458:
I realise it's probably a little strange to ask so long after it happened, but does anyone know what might have caused this? Is there enough information to know? The card has since been discarded of. I had it for a few years before this happened, and I've had my replacement for over a year with no
221:
I can see the point of this: some people who write articles in pay-journals also put the articles on their personal web pages; sometimes articles on the big pay-sites will be reprinted in free-access publications, or in books that are on Google Books, or displayed for a period on the journal's own
1823:
Pick a cap of the same value and rating, 100uF 16v with a different dialectic and construction method and you'll get a different set of failure figures. Then you just pick which one you want for the product. Are you trying to build a reputation for long term reliability for a premium market, or a
1819:
Caps come in a great many varieties, different construction methods, different dielectrics, different insulation, different casing and they all have their own service life characteristics. Some of them last longer than others, measured in two ways. Individual caps and production runs for example.
1510:
makes this an impossible to do, because keeping the money in your pocket means it doubles in purchasing power every two years. Repair of products that use capacitors as planned obsolescence is a hobby for many, and a small business for others because it is very easy, simple and cheap. I link to a
697:
Not really answering your question, but why would low power levels blow your speakers? If that was the case, wouldn't the speakers blow in the quiet bit between tracks, or if you fell asleep while listening and it got to the end of your music selection? There is a reason why
Knowledge considers
1834:
L.E.D. lighting is precisely the same, you can get the crystals to last for 80 years or more continuously, all LED's used as indicators fall into this class. High lumen output LEDs fall into two classes, those overdriven so that they will burn out in a set number of hours and those not driven or
1421:
You could probably make use of the 'cut' command to extract just the numbers you are after before piping the result to sort. Take a look at the manual page for cut to see how best to use it for this application (I'm thinking here that perhaps there is an option to extract just the bit between a
356:
I think that the statement of the theorem assumes that you are dealing with a Turing
Complete language that includes goto, and, then, goes onto say that removing goto and replacing it with the controls above still gives a turing complete language. Essentially, I think that the way the theorem is
1454:
So a few years ago, I bought a graphics card. Used it for a good long time, then I had computer problems which I figured were graphical in nature. When I took the graphics card out, some of the little cylindrical metal things on it had burst/cracked open. I replaced the card; all has been well.
1160:
I'm nodding along as I read your post - I'm not sure if the fan has been running or not, or what the temp is (it's only been like this for a bit) but I suspect you've probably hit the nail on the head. I'll check, and I guess I'll end up taking it apart myself () because I'm flat broke. That's
602:
is
Chinese and big. I don't know if their business model fits people like you in though. You may need to find a manufacturer that can put your brand on their product. The way I normally check for bad products is by forum posts to see what complaints there are about different products. or the
1944:
A while ago, I installed a real time currency exchange rate display that parked itself on the right side of my screen in Vista Home. For some reason, a few days ago, it disappeared. Is there some record of what it was (so I can search for it and try reinstalling it)? Or can you recommend one?
716:
Some people seem to think that a low-power amplifier turned up beyond reasonable volume produces excessive clipping that damages speakers. I'm sceptical about the claim. By the way, your speakers are not wired in parallel, they are connected to separate amplifiers (one per channel), so your
164:
behind
Springer's paywall, then they own the copyright, and you are not legally entitled to a copy unless you, or your institution, have paid for access. (Whether this state of affairs is fair, reasonable, or ethical is a different matter entirely :) So, I imagine that if such a plugin/add-on
159:
Perhaps I should clarify a little further. It is possible to publish an open access article in a
Springer journal. In this case, there is no paywall, and anyone can get the document from Springer, and post it anywhere they please. This costs ~3000 USD, paid by the authors. If the article
1766:
I have with
Planned Obsolesence is that a lot of the time it presents a false dichotomy; it shows a "black and white" picture of a very complex situation and in doing so leaves out whole swathes of the issue. It basically proposes that if something/anything fails, it was
854:
One comment: I never turn the volume all the way up on anything. I find that it's risky to do so. Distortion is likely, and permanent damage is possible. Yes, they shouldn't sell anything that can be damaged by turning it all the way up, but they seem to do so anyway.
1878:
How? I know review the reviews, but it seems that every hosting provider has some enemies writing review about why they suck. And price: not too expensive not too cheap, but all seem to be getting cheaper and cheaper and I don't need the more sophisticated services.
284:
No, it isn't homework. My personal understanding of the theorem makes me guess it implies Turing completeness, however I think this is such an important implication that it would have been written in the article, where it isn't, so I'm asking here.
569:
I am a online website owner and I want toEthernet switch,router from China to enrich my product line, and I was heard that there are many cheaters in China, I don`t know how to choose a good reputation supplier. Could anyone give me some advice?
1506:
of defence. Only purchasing hardware with specifications you need at the time of purchase is another way, people are usually tricked into purchasing too much speed or memory than they need at the time, thinking that they can use it later on.
409:
The theorem is talking about algorithms, not programming languages, and you don't normally say that a particular class of algorithms is Turing complete; instead you say that it can compute any computable function. It's essentially the same
923:
The parentheses make the regex capture the digits in so-called "capturing groups" $ 1 and $ 2. The name of a capt. group in the "replace with" string is actually called a "backreference" and is just replaced with the value captured by the
1815:
Look you haven't upset me, but your not doing yourself any favours by throwing it back in my face either. The matter is a simplistic capitalist theory, short sighted and juvenile in my opinion, like I said, I favour the German approach.
427:
label1 = true; label2 = ... = labelN = false; while (not labelN) { if (label1) { do_stuff; label1 = false; label17 = true; } if (label2) { ... } ... }
1820:
Pick one kind of 100uF 16v cap for a production run of 100,000 television sets and the power supply will yield say .5Â % failure in 12 months for 5 hours a day usage, 4% failure in the next 5 years, 11% failure at 10 years.
1243:
LOL. Well, I guess now you know that I didn't read a single word of your original post. The kernel handles hardware interactions, so that makes me suspect an issue with a device in your computer or perhaps a corrupt
1917:
because wikipedia used to be registered with them (and they are the default registar of google sites), but due to some controversies regarding Godaddy's support of SOPA, wikipedia has moved their registrations to
1645:
well the rust belt article is in quite a mess, I'll have to put that on my list of things to do, no conspiracy theory about suppressing the truth there, it's just poor editing to leave out entomology of the term.
1780:
never said if you don't agree with capitalism you are a conspiracy nut, that would ALSO be a falsly black and white picture, I'm saying the very opposite, I'm saying there are lots of shades of grey.
1082:
is an interesting discussion of the apparent fact that kernel_task goes nuts if the temperature starts to spike, which could be related to the aforementioned physical damage. Just speculation. --
1827:
You see where I am going with this ? It's the first thing they teach you at greedy little capitalist scum school. Remember light bulbs? They used to be manufactured from methods which produced
675:
Amplifier Output = Amplifier Watts x (Amplifier Rated at Ohms / Speaker Chain Ohms) Amplifier Output = 30 watts x (8 ohms / 3 ohms) Amplifier Output = 30 watts x 8/3 Amplifier Output = 80W
108:
Are there any add-ons for Firefox or Chrome that will detect when I'm hitting an academic journal paywall, search for an open-access copy of the article, and redirect me if one is found?
201:
Yes. I just recently got an article accepted into a Springer journal. That is what they asked me to pay them in return for them publishing the article under an open access agreement :-/
682:
To summarize this ridiculously long post: Am I completely off base? Is this likely the reason I blew my speakers? Would I be wise to buy new speakers/amps with the described specs?
769:
It may have just blown a fuse, or it may have melted the wires on the speaker. Really an amplified speaker should hvae some overload protection and not drive its speakers too hard.
66:
51:
1378:
but it needs to be fixed, as the grep part prints out the whole lines, instead of printing only the numbers, and I don't know how to do that. (here you find documentation for grep
1100:
This is really intriguing; thanks. Gonna try to run the computer in a really cold environment - but any ideas on how to do that beyond just a bottle of frozen water underneath it?
626:
I bought an integrated amplifier and two bookshelf passive speakers. It seems I've managed to blow one of them: all the bass and mid on that channel is gone, leaving only treble.
59:
1838:
Anyhow, I talk too much, I should go stick this all in an article so someone can get a kick out of deleting it as OR because their fingers are broken and they can't use google.
125:
I don't know. When I don't have institutional access for whatever reason, I just use google scholar on the title, which often enough finds an un-blocked pdf. Note that this is
55:
1960:
Does it still show in the folder C:\Program Files\Windows Sidebar\Gadgets? Maybe it was removed from the desktop by mistake. You can also check in C:\User\<Your name: -->
440:
and new boolean variables, but can hardly be called "structured". Getting rid of all gotos without introducing new boolean variables is a much more interesting problem. --
1007:
It's odd; Activity Monitor is showing much more activity than it normally would, even when the computer's at rest (no applications really open except the aforementioned.
1748:. The problem is, "planned obsolescence", like any philosophical construct, tends to come apart in your hands like a piece of rotten cloth when it is closely examined.
1976:
It's there in C:\Program Files\Windows Sidebar\Gadgets\Currency.Gadget, but I don't know how to get it back on my desktop. There's an icon, a drag, and an en-US folder.
357:
stated in the article is not exactly what the theorem says, but that as applied to most things that would be considered a "programming language" it would be accurate.
1195:. Then, restart your computer. I'd also check the Activity Monitor to see if any programs are hogging your CPU. You can find that program in your Utilities folder.â
1307:
twitterapi: Twitter Site Issue - Some users may currently be experiencing site issues; our engineers are working on... http://t.co/8mJhxmBu</description: -->
787:
actually mean?" Has it blown up? Has it suffered some problem unique to speakers, and not other pieces of equipment, or has it simply stopped working, or...?
1422:
defined delimiter - "/" in this case). The final command would therefore look like (with the "???" filled with the result of your looking at the man page):
928:
672:
Resistance = (Speaker A x Speaker B) / (Speaker A + Speaker B) Resistance = (6 Ohms x 6 Ohms) / (6 Ohms + 6 Ohms) Resistance = 36 / 12 Resistance = 3 Ohms
25:
1305:
twitterapi: Twitter Site Issue - Some users may currently be experiencing site issues; our engineers are working on... http://t.co/8mJhxmBu</title: -->
270:
your homework, feel free to tell us where you are stuck and ask for help. If you need help grasping the concept of a problem, by all means let us know. --
1771:
to fail. I don't say that is never true, or has never happened, but sometimes a burned out capacitor is just a burned out capacitor. there is no need to
1365:', and print out only the sequence of digits at the end | sort lines from lowest to highest | grab only the first line of output (i.e. the lowest number)
85:
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the
669:
I figure this out as such, since the speakers are wired in parallel (that is they have two separate inputs on the amp for the left and right channels):
339:
Meanwhile, I found another counterexample: a structured programming language that imposes an upper bound on the amount of memory is not Turing complete.
1324:
twitterapi: Developer Teatime is coming to Paris - please sign up to join us on June 16th! https://t.co/pQOUNKGD @rno @jasoncosta</description: -->
629:
I'm wanting to replace them, but I want to make sure I buy the correct speakers so that I don't blow them again. Here is the specs of my equipment:
520:
Hi, I'm new to assembly, I understand that the first "thing" after the mov instruction means the memory address to copy it, so what does it mean:
1322:
twitterapi: Developer Teatime is coming to Paris - please sign up to join us on June 16th! https://t.co/pQOUNKGD @rno @jasoncosta</title: -->
299:
OK. It was worded like a homework question, but I take your word for it. Unfortunately I'm not really familiar with the theorem you mention. --
1213:
Well, that's the thing - Activity Monitor seems to be showing kernel_task as taking up all the CPU, and it's slow like that even before login.
1415:
cat < file | grep 'http://twitter.com/.*/statuses/]*' | sort | head --lines=1|sed 's/http\:\/\/twitter\.com\/.*\/statuses/\(]*\).*$ /\1/'
1292:
twitterapi: If you're exploring the @twitterapi, be sure and bring this new field guide along. https://t.co/5av8rKW4 ^TS</description: -->
525:
137:. Many academics engage in the practice of posting their articles on personal or departmental websites, under the belief that it constitutes
45:
1370:
where | means piping, and .* means zero or more characters. I do not know how to do that on Windows. On Unix/Unix-like you could try with
1530:
1460:
1290:
twitterapi: If you're exploring the @twitterapi, be sure and bring this new field guide along. https://t.co/5av8rKW4 ^TS</title: -->
145:
disagrees with that interpretation, and will on occasion compel the authors to remove their own content from freely-accessible places.
133:, which is something different. Technically, getting a research article without the proper access (and payments) could be construed as
1385:
1347:
932:
550:
480:
465:
343:
286:
251:
37:
1607:
ten times the profit." Maybe I should take a look at our article on the subject and see if it is a good representation of the topic.
1273:
and return the lowest (ie smallest, not furthest down the page) number from the "randomnumber" part. For example, the file contains;
21:
129:"open access". If an article is published in e.g. Science, and the author posts it on her homepage, that does not make the article
1718:
is one brilliant way to roll around in ten times the cash is just a conspiracy nut. Vespine win, Penyulap lose, end of debate.
1602:
is something accepted as a sound business model across most of the United States, it's so culturally ingrained that names like
1548:
1048:
It's slow booting up, afterwards, and shutting down. (Also, physical damage may be a factor, but I can't see how that would do
586:
266:
265:
Welcome to Knowledge. Your question appears to be a homework question. I apologize if this is a misinterpretation, but it is
187:
What costs ~3000 USD? To make one article, that you wrote yourself and provided it to Springer free of charge, open access?
1226:
1174:
1113:
1065:
1024:
751:
Just reading this for interest because I can't add anything helpful, but I have a question of clarification. What does "
165:
existed, the creators would soon face nasty letters from the big academic publishers and their highly-paid legal teams.
1987:
1970:
1954:
1931:
1908:
1888:
1867:
1851:
1828:
1789:
1757:
1731:
1676:
1659:
1620:
1561:
1538:
1524:
1492:
1468:
1438:
1407:
1393:
1355:
1253:
1230:
1204:
1178:
1143:
1117:
1091:
1069:
1043:
1028:
992:
966:
940:
904:
864:
841:
827:
796:
778:
764:
742:
707:
691:
612:
590:
558:
533:
509:
488:
473:
449:
396:
366:
351:
327:
308:
294:
279:
259:
231:
210:
196:
174:
154:
119:
547:
1379:
883:, and hopefully someone can help. I'd like to change instances of digit-hyphen-digit to digit-endash-digit, like:
895:
It seems that using "\d-\d" finds the string, but I'm stumped as to what to put in to do the replacement. Cheers,
1489:
1403:
879:, but it looks like the sort of thing I'd be OK at once I get going. I'm trying to do some find-and-replace in
774:
608:
698:
forums to be unreliable sources. Perhaps seeking assistance at a decent hi-fi shop would give better advice.
529:
504:
206:
170:
150:
86:
17:
1534:
1464:
1389:
1249:
1200:
936:
554:
484:
469:
362:
347:
323:
290:
255:
227:
1983:
1950:
1896:
1351:
962:
900:
664:
582:
549:
section 1.2.4. I guess it's the memory location whose address is the value of eax + the value of edx. --
479:
So it turned out that it is the wording in the article and not the theorem itself - thanx to you all. --
392:
243:
415:
Note that this theorem is not actually very interesting, since any spaghetti-code algorithm of the form
464:
Reworded the head of the article, now it is expressed in terms of algorithms rather than languages. --
388:
1966:
1715:
1599:
1574:
1502:
1483:
1399:
988:
980:
770:
604:
574:
114:
1884:
1459:
problems, too. But I figure, if it's something I could have prevented, I should probably find out.
1434:
1268:
From the command line on Windows 7 I need to find a way to parse a text/rss file for instances of
703:
578:
500:
304:
275:
247:
202:
166:
146:
134:
1130:
The environment won't matter. Download something that shows you the temperature of the CPU (I use
1846:
1726:
1654:
1615:
1519:
1425:
cat < file | grep 'http://twitter.com/.*/statuses/]*' | cut -????????? | sort | head --lines=1
1245:
1196:
358:
319:
223:
188:
953:
for a page/section on regular expressions but obviously missed that one. And re: en dash â see
1364:
read file | grab only lines matching the format 'http://twitter.com/.*/statuses/<digits: -->
833:
683:
1979:
1946:
1927:
1863:
1785:
1672:
1557:
1544:
565:
I want to find a qualified and reliable Ethernet switch,router supplier for my online business
419:
label1: do_stuff; goto label17; label2: ... labelN: return;
1775:
agency into it. I've made circuits for myself and I've burned out an LED or a capacitor, did
1737:
1479:
1222:
1170:
1109:
1061:
1039:
1020:
983:
as well, as there's a group of editors very familiar with regex and AWB working over there.
958:
896:
860:
792:
760:
192:
1962:
1904:
1139:
1087:
984:
544:
540:
495:
445:
109:
1880:
1430:
1217:
1165:
1104:
1056:
1015:
837:
699:
687:
300:
271:
1840:
1753:
1720:
1648:
1609:
1603:
1513:
950:
880:
250:
of a programming language? If not, can you explain why, and give a counterexample? --
1923:
1859:
1781:
1668:
1553:
1507:
1478:
which can fail for a variety of reasons, but perhaps in your case it was the dread
1346:
and other command line text tools to do this on my own and I need help. Thank you!
1919:
1373:
cat < file | grep 'http://twitter.com/.*/statuses/]*' | sort | head --lines=1
1214:
1162:
1101:
1053:
1035:
1012:
856:
803:
788:
756:
718:
623:
Not sure if this question belongs here but the header said "Electronics", so...
130:
1342:
so the script should return "197011505181507585". I am not familar enough with
1900:
1475:
1135:
1083:
441:
1569:
Vespine, No no, you are confusing my planned obsolescence commentary with my
1361:
I'm not an expert in shell scripting, however it's what it should look like:
1079:
74:
1749:
142:
138:
387:
are, but I assume that the original publication is a bit more rigorous.
1914:
1330:
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/statuses/197011505181507585</link: -->
1328:
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/statuses/197011505181507585</guid: -->
1313:
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/statuses/197238186861264896</link: -->
1311:
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/statuses/197238186861264896</guid: -->
1298:
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/statuses/198085550136229888</link: -->
1296:
http://twitter.com/twitterapi/statuses/198085550136229888</guid: -->
954:
1271:
http://twitter.com/ EXAMPLEUSERNAME/statuses/RANDOMNUMER</link: -->
665:
http://www.marktaw.com/recording/Electronics/OhmsAmpsandSpeakers.html
599:
1131:
663:
Those figures are from the units themselves. Now using this site:
876:
1343:
1511:
forum in a section below that is set up for just that purpose.
1566:
90.195.196.XX, you are most welcome, I am glad I could assist.
383:
Yes, the article glosses over the question what exactly those
1474:
It's unlikely to be anything you did. Those cylinders were
1191:
Try disabling items from starting automatically by going to
332:
The theorem states that your example language can implement
1762:
Penyulap. I apologise if I upset or insulted you. The main
498:, a differently-flavored, but also Turing-complete system.
79:
Welcome to the Knowledge Computing Reference Desk Archives
1740:- it is informative. It's less that the capacitors were
1008:
1570:
1315:<a href="http://www.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow": -->
949:
Thanks... I'll see if that works. I looked around at
1961:\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsSidebar\Gadgets.
1003:My MacBook Pro has been running ridiculously slow
104:Browser add-on to redirect from academic paywalls
1326:Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:16:17 +0000</pubDate: -->
1309:Tue, 01 May 2012 08:17:02 +0000</pubDate: -->
1294:Thu, 03 May 2012 16:24:10 +0000</pubDate: -->
1161:probably not a Really Really Bad Idea... right?
653:Amplifier requirements (no clipping): 15 to 105W
539:It's the "Based Indexed Indirect Addressing"
8:
929:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser/Regular_expression
1193:System Preferences â Accounts â Login Items
1034:Is it slow immediately after booting up? Š
1874:How to choose hosting and domain registrar
1276:
1451:I don't really know much about hardware.
802:speakers designed for classical music.
49:
36:
1279:
783:But that's not an answer to "What does
65:
43:
7:
1543:Planned obsolescence is verging on
1447:What happened to my graphics card?
1398:sed can edit the line on the fly.
32:
1011:; anyone have any ideas? Thanks.
642:Rated: 30W per channel into 8Ohm.
633:Amp model: Cambridge Audio A1 mk3
659:Power handling (programme): 105W
656:Power handling (continuous): 70W
524:That would move esi to.. Where?
455:
336:, so maybe the theorem is wrong?
647:Speakers: Wharfedale Laser 100
1:
717:calculations are incorrect.
33:
1913:Well I was going to suggest
1571:conspiracy theory commentary
1829:Longest-lasting light bulbs
1332:web</twitter:source: -->
1300:web</twitter:source: -->
636:Max power consumption: 150W
432:in which form it uses only
2006:
639:Valid impedances: 6-16Ohm
334:every computable function
1978:Figured it out. Thanks.
1384:Hope it helps though. --
1317:</twitter:source: -->
1078:Is it running very hot?
931:for more information. --
619:Why did my speaker blow?
18:Knowledge:Reference desk
1988:22:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
1971:18:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1955:21:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1932:01:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1909:01:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
1889:21:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1868:23:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
1852:12:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
1790:23:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1758:20:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1732:06:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1677:05:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1660:03:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1621:03:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1562:01:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
1539:09:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
1525:10:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1493:21:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1469:20:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1439:17:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
1408:08:33, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1394:18:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1356:18:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1333:<twitter:place/: -->
1331:<twitter:source: -->
1318:<twitter:place/: -->
1314:<twitter:source: -->
1301:<twitter:place/: -->
1299:<twitter:source: -->
1264:Search file for numbers
1254:06:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1231:06:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1205:16:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
1179:23:08, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1144:13:58, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1118:06:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
1092:14:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
1070:21:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1044:19:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1029:17:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
993:21:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
967:18:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
941:18:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
905:17:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
865:17:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
842:17:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
828:11:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
797:18:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
779:08:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
765:17:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
743:18:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
708:17:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
692:17:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
613:08:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
591:06:43, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
559:06:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
543:of x86 processors. See
534:05:54, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
510:22:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
494:Possibly relevant: the
489:18:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
474:05:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
450:15:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
397:16:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
367:15:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
352:10:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
328:09:18, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
309:05:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
295:04:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
280:04:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
260:04:37, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
232:16:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
211:18:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
197:15:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
175:15:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
155:15:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
120:02:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
1744:as that they were not
87:current reference desk
1529:Thanks for the info.
920:(what is an endash??)
244:Bohm-Jacopini theorem
1897:NearlyFreeSpeech.NET
1736:Review that link on
1716:Planned obsolescence
1600:Planned obsolescence
1575:Planned obsolescence
1503:Planned obsolescence
1501:It is an example of
1323:<description: -->
1306:<description: -->
1291:<description: -->
516:Assembly instruction
1835:designed that way.
1009:Here's a screenshot
423:can be rewritten as
248:Turing completeness
238:Turing completeness
135:copyright violation
1545:conspiracy theory
1339:
1338:
1316:Tumblr</a: -->
1229:
1177:
1116:
1068:
1027:
785:to blow a speaker
755:" actually mean?
753:to blow a speaker
594:
577:comment added by
93:
92:
73:
72:
1997:
1849:
1845:
1738:capacitor plague
1729:
1725:
1657:
1653:
1618:
1614:
1522:
1518:
1480:capacitor plague
1325:<pubDate: -->
1308:<pubDate: -->
1293:<pubDate: -->
1281:Extended content
1277:
1225:
1220:
1173:
1168:
1112:
1107:
1064:
1059:
1023:
1018:
919:
913:
892:
888:
824:
823:
820:
817:
814:
811:
808:
739:
738:
735:
732:
729:
726:
723:
593:
571:
523:
463:
459:
458:
141:. However, e.g.
117:
112:
75:
34:
2005:
2004:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1942:
1876:
1847:
1839:
1727:
1719:
1655:
1647:
1616:
1608:
1520:
1512:
1484:Finlay McWalter
1449:
1400:Graeme Bartlett
1340:
1335:
1282:
1266:
1218:
1166:
1105:
1057:
1016:
1005:
917:
911:
890:
886:
873:
821:
818:
815:
812:
809:
806:
805:
771:Graeme Bartlett
736:
733:
730:
727:
724:
721:
720:
676:
673:
650:Impedance: 6Ohm
621:
605:Graeme Bartlett
572:
567:
541:addressing mode
526:190.158.212.204
521:
518:
496:lambda calculus
456:
454:
429:
420:
240:
115:
110:
106:
101:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
2003:
2001:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1941:
1940:Missing gadget
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1875:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1567:
1496:
1495:
1448:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1382:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1337:
1336:
1334:</item: -->
1321:<title: -->
1319:</item: -->
1304:<title: -->
1302:</item: -->
1289:<title: -->
1287:
1284:
1283:
1280:
1275:
1265:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1208:
1207:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1095:
1094:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1004:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
972:
971:
970:
969:
944:
943:
925:
921:
918:$ 1 endash $ 2
916:Replace with:
914:
872:
869:
868:
867:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
830:
748:
747:
746:
745:
711:
710:
674:
671:
661:
660:
657:
654:
651:
648:
644:
643:
640:
637:
634:
620:
617:
616:
615:
566:
563:
562:
561:
517:
514:
513:
512:
477:
476:
452:
439:
435:
426:
425:
424:
418:
417:
416:
412:
411:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
340:
337:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
239:
236:
235:
234:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
203:SemanticMantis
180:
179:
178:
177:
167:SemanticMantis
147:SemanticMantis
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
81:
71:
70:
64:
48:
41:
40:
38:Computing desk
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2002:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1939:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1916:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1850:
1844:
1843:
1836:
1832:
1830:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1730:
1724:
1723:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1658:
1652:
1651:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1622:
1619:
1613:
1612:
1605:
1604:The rust belt
1601:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1550:
1549:military spec
1546:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1531:90.195.196.44
1528:
1527:
1526:
1523:
1517:
1516:
1509:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1461:90.195.196.58
1456:
1452:
1446:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1429:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1369:
1363:
1362:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1329:<link: -->
1327:<guid: -->
1320:<item: -->
1312:<link: -->
1310:<guid: -->
1303:<item: -->
1297:<link: -->
1295:<guid: -->
1288:<item: -->
1286:
1285:
1278:
1274:
1272:
1270:<link: -->
1263:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1246:Best Dog Ever
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1197:Best Dog Ever
1194:
1190:
1189:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1108:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1002:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
947:
946:
945:
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
915:
909:
908:
907:
906:
902:
898:
893:
884:
882:
878:
870:
866:
862:
858:
853:
852:
843:
839:
835:
831:
829:
826:
825:
800:
799:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
750:
749:
744:
741:
740:
715:
714:
713:
712:
709:
705:
701:
696:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
680:
670:
667:
666:
658:
655:
652:
649:
646:
645:
641:
638:
635:
632:
631:
630:
627:
624:
618:
614:
610:
606:
601:
597:
596:
595:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
515:
511:
508:
506:
502:
497:
493:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
475:
471:
467:
462:
453:
451:
447:
443:
437:
433:
431:
430:
422:
421:
414:
413:
408:
407:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
368:
364:
360:
359:Phoenixia1177
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
335:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
320:Phoenixia1177
316:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:Colapeninsula
220:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
176:
172:
168:
163:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
118:
113:
103:
98:
96:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
76:
68:
61:
57:
53:
47:
42:
39:
35:
27:
23:
19:
1980:Clarityfiend
1975:
1947:Clarityfiend
1943:
1877:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1763:
1746:made to last
1745:
1742:made to fail
1741:
1721:
1649:
1610:
1514:
1486:
1457:
1453:
1450:
1414:
1386:151.75.39.16
1348:82.45.62.107
1341:
1269:
1267:
1192:
1049:
1006:
933:151.75.39.16
894:
885:
874:
804:
784:
752:
719:
681:
677:
668:
662:
628:
625:
622:
573:â Preceding
568:
551:151.75.39.16
519:
499:
481:151.75.39.16
478:
466:151.75.39.16
460:
384:
344:151.75.39.16
333:
287:151.75.39.16
267:our aim here
252:151.75.39.16
241:
161:
126:
107:
94:
78:
1920:Markmonitor
1508:Moore's law
875:I'm new to
546:section 5;
389:KarlLohmann
385:subprograms
131:open access
1963:Sandman30s
1476:capacitors
985:Shadowjams
246:imply the
1881:OsmanRF34
1431:Astronaut
1080:This post
957:. Cheers
912:(\d)-(\d)
871:AWB Regex
700:Astronaut
603:company.
505:Stansifer
301:Trovatore
272:Trovatore
242:Does the
50:<<
26:Computing
1842:Penyulap
1769:designed
1722:Penyulap
1650:Penyulap
1611:Penyulap
1515:Penyulap
1244:driver.â
1227:contribs
1175:contribs
1132:iStatPro
1114:contribs
1066:contribs
1025:contribs
981:WT:AWB/T
979:Look at
587:contribs
579:Enoepoch
575:unsigned
522:mov ,esi
143:Springer
139:fair use
24: |
22:Archives
20: |
1924:Vespine
1915:Godaddy
1860:Vespine
1782:Vespine
1669:Vespine
1554:Vespine
910:Regex:
89:pages.
1036:Reisio
951:WP:AWB
924:group.
881:WP:AWB
857:StuRat
789:HiLo48
757:HiLo48
600:Huawei
410:thing.
189:XPPaul
116:Merlin
1901:Mr.98
1899:). --
1764:issue
1482:. --
1136:Mr.98
1084:Mr.98
877:regex
598:Well
442:BenRG
434:while
99:May 3
69:: -->
67:May 4
63:: -->
62:: -->
46:May 2
44:<
16:<
1984:talk
1967:talk
1951:talk
1928:talk
1905:talk
1885:talk
1864:talk
1786:talk
1773:read
1754:talk
1673:talk
1558:talk
1535:talk
1490:Talk
1465:talk
1435:talk
1404:talk
1390:talk
1352:talk
1344:grep
1250:talk
1201:talk
1140:talk
1088:talk
1050:this
1040:talk
989:talk
963:talk
959:matt
955:here
937:talk
927:See
901:talk
897:matt
861:talk
838:talk
834:Amoe
793:talk
775:talk
761:talk
704:talk
688:talk
684:Amoe
609:talk
583:talk
555:talk
530:talk
501:Paul
485:talk
470:talk
461:Done
446:talk
436:and
393:talk
363:talk
348:talk
324:talk
305:talk
291:talk
276:talk
256:talk
228:talk
207:talk
193:talk
171:talk
151:talk
111:Neon
1750:Wnt
1223:g92
1171:g92
1110:g92
1062:g92
1052:.)
1021:g92
891:4â9
889:to
887:4-9
127:not
60:Jun
56:May
52:Apr
1986:)
1969:)
1953:)
1930:)
1922:.
1907:)
1887:)
1866:)
1788:)
1756:)
1675:)
1573:.
1560:)
1537:)
1467:)
1437:)
1406:)
1392:)
1354:)
1252:)
1215:Ab
1203:)
1163:Ab
1142:)
1102:Ab
1090:)
1054:Ab
1042:)
1013:Ab
991:)
965:)
939:)
903:)
863:)
840:)
795:)
777:)
763:)
706:)
690:)
611:)
589:)
585:âą
557:)
532:)
487:)
472:)
448:)
438:if
395:)
365:)
350:)
342:--
326:)
307:)
293:)
285:--
278:)
258:)
230:)
209:)
195:)
173:)
162:is
153:)
58:|
54:|
1982:(
1965:(
1949:(
1926:(
1903:(
1883:(
1862:(
1848:â
1784:(
1777:I
1752:(
1728:â
1671:(
1656:â
1617:â
1556:(
1533:(
1521:â
1487:á·
1463:(
1433:(
1402:(
1388:(
1381:)
1350:(
1248:(
1219:e
1199:(
1167:e
1138:(
1106:e
1086:(
1058:e
1038:(
1017:e
987:(
961:(
935:(
899:(
859:(
836:(
822:s
819:r
816:i
813:f
810:b
807:D
791:(
773:(
759:(
737:s
734:r
731:i
728:f
725:b
722:D
702:(
686:(
607:(
581:(
553:(
528:(
507:)
503:(
483:(
468:(
444:(
391:(
361:(
346:(
322:(
303:(
289:(
274:(
254:(
226:(
205:(
191:(
169:(
149:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.