371:). In addition, the user does not seem to understand the purpose of article talk pages; using them as off-topic discussion threads and trolling ponds. I would like the user to become a responsible editor who follows policy and does not need to be watched; but unfortunately, I don't see that happening. The resources required to correct the user's edits and police their behavior are more than should have to be expended by other editors and admins. There is little or no good faith in this user's edits and contributions; sadly, just the opposite. The user appears to be a textbook boundary-pushing troll.
469:. In response to what could have been a good faith request for citations, I found and added references to the section on Nazi gas chambers - not autopsy results, of course, as those are somewhat hard to find for Holocaust victims, but other sources that were reputable and verifiable. A couple of weeks later, he returned to the talk page and again asked for autopsy results
343:; involving his disputing the numbers of dead in The Holocaust. After that exchange, I took a look at the user's contributions. I hate to think the worst of someone; but there was something dark about the user's edits/contributions, when looked at not just individually, but as a whole, as a pattern. Not just the blatant POV pushing (e.g.,
60:
user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 21:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)), the
816:
Just a quick view of the this person's editing history and talk page shows that he is using
Knowledge (XXG) to promote a blatant racist and anti-semetic political agenda, and is not prepared to interact with other editors in a civil and productive manner. This editor should probably be blocked from
561:
i reject the terms anti-semetic and racist as i am neither. becuase i provoke what i feel are inteligent discussions? because i question the "official" version of history. because i rasie thought provoking questions? i think that there is a hypersensitivity here and that there are too many people
933:
Keltik31 appears harmless. Many of his edits are very opinionated and possibly offensive to a selected some. If this user were to bring citation, there would not be an issue. Summary 2 states: "after this kind of edit every action from this user is suspect." Every edit form every user should be
902:
While I can't speak to the user's other edits, (s)he should not be reprimanded for that. I would advise, however, that in future discussion on the talk page, I would advise the user use a subject heading such as "Removed an edit containing a racial slur" rather than to repeat the slur there.
554:
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response"
583:
i didnt say that they werent terrorists. get your facts straight my friend. where do i say "the 9/11 hijackers were not terrorists"? am i missing something? is there something in the water i drink that makes me so far off the same page as people who make stupid claims like this?
803:
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside
532:
article edits, I notice that he removed several cited statements as well as inserting his own (uncited) POV statements. As he seems to have denied every accusation of POV made against him, it appears likely that he'll continue to compromise the validity of articles until he is
870:
It was not removed as normal vandalism should be it was moved to the talk page. Completely inappropriate, either a completely misguided revert or outright racism. We can assume good faith but given this users time on
Knowledge (XXG) and other edits it is difficult.
496:. This editor seems to either not understand or not care about verifiability and the use of reputable sources. He also seems to prefer spending time posting and reposting talk page questions that border on trolling to actually making substantive edits to articles.
408:
As it became clearer that he was simply trying to stir things up and wasn't actually interested in learning more about
Catholicism I still gave him information but pointed out that this may be an instance of trolling on his part. His response was
562:
with too much time on their hands. that is my opinion. i think that the holocaust was exadgerated and that the naacp is a racist organization. i am not alone. but i am not a nazi or a klansman because of it and i resent the implication.
942:
to alter his writing style; if he cannot, he is recommended to express his opinions anywhere that is not
Knowledge (XXG). Just be cautious not to get shot by people who disagree with you. Freedom of speech is not a real thing.
880:
the "upity nigger" comment was put on the article page by someone else. i moved it to the discussion page and commented that i had to remove it. i dont use that word to describe people, not even thugs like rodney king.
199:
Added "israel is a terrorist state and does it's evil deeds with the consent and taxpaer dollars of american citizens who are kept in the dark as to the facts by the zionist-controlled media....the
Wikitards"
973:. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.
741:, and there truly are very well known sources and institutions that deem or have deemed them terrorists. In related statements of his- anti-Israel sentiments, and those drawing attention to
666:
has a little bit of a bombastic style which he could certainly work to clean up. The only point of evidence that should stand against him is the as it is definitely in violation of
593:
this is another fabrication of the truth. i have made edits and asked questions of other issues. this sounds more to me like a
Knowledge (XXG) Witch Hunt than a real inquiry.
970:
111:
User repeatedly makes only racist and anti-Semetic contributions. Pushes POV with nearly every edit. User is also incivil and has impersonated an administrator. --
602:
i was not trying to stir the pot, i was just trying to understand why the faith does some of the things it does. i found you to be the one being confrontational.
404:
just wondering where catholics get some of their practices from. if it isnt in the bible, then it isnt legit in my book. you just cant make it up as you go.
808:{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
490:. I suggested that if he really disagreed with the article and its references, he could edit it himself if he could find valid and reputable sources
402:. I attempted to answer his questions. It became increasingly clear that he wasn't interested in asking questions but instead was stirring the pot:
493:. He never took me up on that suggestion, but returned to the talk page to once again post questions casting doubt on the facts of the Holocaust
296:
issues. If the user would be civil, not insult other editors and sourced his additions we wouldn't have nearly as serious issue with the POV.
686:
can be viewed as a difference of opinion for which there has been no good faith effort by other parties to seek consensus, therefore
231:
49:
17:
574:
what have i said that is racist or anti-semetic? you can lobb that accusation, but back it up. i consider that a personal attack.
314:). Since then, despite a block by another admin for personal attacks, it appears that disruptive behavior has continued (examples
226:
787:
particular views on these issues, but I do affirm his non-violation of policies summary as detailed within my above response.
52:, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the
749:
99:
This user has been accused of disruptive behavior including uncivil statements, personal attacks, threats, and violations of
80:
423:
When it was pointed out by another editor that talk pages really aren't the place for such a discussion his response was:
480:, everything any reputable historian has ever written about the Holocaust - were explained. He rejected these references
487:
938:
because you didn't like him using the word nigger. Many edits are POVs and to write for
Knowledge (XXG), he would
779:(e.g., "put the crack pipe down") are not any sort of violation when part of talk pages. I should be clear that I
241:
731:
329:
891:
While this probably could have been better phrased on the talk page, it does appear to be true that this user
363:) while at the same time injecting negative (as well as factually inaccurate) POVs into other articles (e.g.,
542:
This user has trouble relating to others and is quick to anger (possibly a troll) also blatant pusher of POV.
919:
872:
851:
536:
753:
723:
691:
236:
772:
74:
761:
667:
399:
He first came to my attention when he asked what appeared to be legitimate questions about
Catholicism
355:) but a deliberate, focused effort to remove the "Jewishness" from certain articles (as the user does
221:
181:
Added 'National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People' to list of allegedly racist groups
86:
850:. This is completely unacceptable, after this kind of edit every action from this user is suspect.
998:
955:
922:
907:
885:
875:
864:
854:
835:
821:
791:
652:
619:
606:
597:
588:
578:
569:
539:
525:
516:
508:
500:
436:
394:
334:
300:
287:
115:
994:
904:
522:
434:
425:
i think i'll do what i want to do and wait for irish guy's response. thanks for your input though
187:
Added 'One of the worst displays of violence was a gauntlet run by black and hispanic rioters'
765:
719:
699:
671:
411:
i suggest you kiss the sunny side of my royal irish ass. trolling? is that a personal attack?
100:
629:
473:
463:
379:
703:
679:
456:
to state that there were no autopsy results showing that anyone had been gassed during the
30:
477:
130:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Keltik31&diff=prev&oldid=84109731
734:
326:
846:
I think that one edit completely destroys Keltik31's defense that he is not a racist,
293:
990:
952:
882:
861:
784:
776:
769:
757:
742:
707:
695:
687:
683:
663:
649:
603:
594:
585:
575:
566:
497:
429:
284:
112:
70:
486:, including an obvious Holocaust denial website and the thorougly debunked pamphlet
305:
I have warned this user for disruptive, POV-pushing, and uncivil behavior (examples
788:
738:
513:
297:
986:
896:
832:
818:
675:
529:
505:
453:
969:
signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to
860:*****this was an edit that i removed. i did not write it. i removed it******
457:
193:"the state of Israel is a terrorist nation and Ariel Sharon is a terrorist"
718:
tags on the content in question or changing the content with attention to
752:, again, I find unsourced statements and a lack of effort in seeking
746:
648:
well? are there any autopsy results proving it? afraid of the truth?
418:
is this a lecture, because i dont remember signing up for the class
400:
848:"He was being an uppity nigger and needed an attitude adjustment"
710:
by other editors whose correct course of action should have been
694:. Rather, his edits were summarily rejected. The allegations of
175:"He was being an uppity nigger and needed an attitude adjustment"
1005:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
44:
A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the page.
698:, which, if demonstrably true, would be a heinous violation of
674:. It is not, however, directed at any person other than the
472:. This led to a discussion where the existing references -
201:
Israel is a terrorist state/Personal attacks on
Wikipedians
483:
and suggested other ones that supported his point of view
416:
At that point, I warned him about civility. His response:
730:, because they are just that, unsourced statements about
268:
User alleges, "Free thought is discouraged here anyway."
982:
900:
847:
615:
494:
491:
484:
481:
470:
467:
460:
427:
421:
414:
406:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
322:
319:
317:
315:
312:
310:
308:
306:
267:
262:
257:
204:
198:
192:
186:
180:
174:
168:
162:
156:
150:
144:
129:
726:. The edits in question would be better qualified as
702:, actually revealed to me a disturbing trend towards
250:
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
678:
so that instance does not qualify as a violation of
61:
page will be deleted. The current date and time is:
29:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
258:
User alleges Knowledge (XXG)'s "gutless liberalism"
462:. I reverted that as a POV edit. He then asked on
760:shows only the aforementioned as a violation of
292:The real issues are personal attacks and blatant
39:No further edits should be made to this page.
899:with the "uppity n*****" quote, not added it.
1011:No further edits should be made to this page.
528:User is biased and uncivil. Looking over his
8:
276:Users certifying the basis for this dispute
151:"you are crazy if you think it happened"
339:My first interaction with the user was
205:Changed "militant" to "citizen soldier"
7:
565:if you want to ban me? then ban me.
445:Other users who endorse this summary
138:wiki pinhead"] part of a long rant
50:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
263:User denies making personal attacks
195:off topic posting at 9/11 talk page
614:(note: this edit is restored from
214:Applicable policies and guidelines
24:
817:contributing to Knowledge (XXG).
103:. 21:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
947:Users who endorse this summary:
914:Users who endorse this summary:
827:Users who endorse this summary:
768:. That calls for a warning on
658:Users who endorse this summary:
63:09:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
682:. The other evidence against
501:22:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
452:This user edited the article
335:21:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
301:21:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
288:21:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
121:Evidence of disputed behavior
116:21:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
48:In order to remain listed at
999:12:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
956:06:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
923:01:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
886:15:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
876:01:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
865:22:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
855:01:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
836:00:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
822:02:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
792:19:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
756:by all parties. In summary,
653:20:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
607:23:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
598:21:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
589:21:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
579:20:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
570:20:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
540:01:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
526:13:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
517:00:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
509:17:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
437:22:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
395:02:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
971:this page's discussion page
908:08:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
690:can not be in violation of
132:"you sound like the typical
1028:
488:Did Six Million Really Die
177:copied this onto talk page
519:Seems pretty clear to me.
169:"put the crack pipe down"
1008:Please do not modify it.
232:WP:Neutral point of view
189:again without discussion
153:'it' being the holocaust
95:Statement of the dispute
36:Please do not modify it.
985:on 10 November 2007 by
171:another personal attack
145:"you're also a liberal"
777:Colloquial expressions
676:subject of the article
618:, re: Eron's comment
227:WP:No personal attacks
101:neutral point of view
466:for autopsy results
147:user page vandalism
31:request for comment
183:without discussion
920:Daniel J. Leivick
873:Daniel J. Leivick
852:Daniel J. Leivick
706:directed against
647:
537:Daniel J. Leivick
157:"stay in chicago"
1019:
1010:
977:Closing comments
783:sympathize with
643:
640:
635:
632:
627:
624:
611:
464:Talk:Gas chamber
393:
390:
385:
382:
377:
374:
332:
242:WP:Verifiability
64:
38:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1006:
979:
964:
949:
931:
916:
844:
829:
814:
800:
712:citation needed
660:
641:
638:
633:
630:
625:
622:
551:
478:Gerstein Report
476:testimony, the
447:
391:
388:
383:
380:
375:
372:
330:
321:and especially
278:
252:
216:
165:personal attack
123:
109:
97:
62:
56:dispute with a
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1025:
1023:
1014:
1013:
978:
975:
963:
960:
959:
958:
948:
945:
930:
927:
926:
925:
915:
912:
911:
910:
868:
867:
843:
840:
839:
838:
828:
825:
813:
810:
799:
796:
795:
794:
659:
656:
550:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
534:
520:
511:
503:
446:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
397:
337:
303:
290:
277:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
265:
260:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
239:
234:
229:
224:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
202:
196:
190:
184:
178:
172:
166:
160:
159:uncivil remark
154:
148:
136:
135:
134:
133:
122:
119:
108:
105:
96:
93:
92:
91:
90:
67:
46:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1024:
1012:
1009:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
981:Keltik31 was
976:
974:
972:
968:
961:
957:
954:
951:
950:
946:
944:
941:
937:
928:
924:
921:
918:
917:
913:
909:
906:
905:Seraphimblade
901:
898:
894:
890:
889:
888:
887:
884:
878:
877:
874:
866:
863:
859:
858:
857:
856:
853:
849:
841:
837:
834:
831:
830:
826:
824:
823:
820:
811:
809:
806:
805:
798:Outside views
797:
793:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
744:
740:
736:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:anti-Semitism
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
662:
661:
657:
655:
654:
651:
646:
645:
636:
628:
621:
617:
609:
608:
605:
600:
599:
596:
591:
590:
587:
581:
580:
577:
572:
571:
568:
563:
559:
558:
556:
548:
541:
538:
535:
531:
527:
524:
521:
518:
515:
512:
510:
507:
504:
502:
499:
495:
492:
489:
485:
482:
479:
475:
471:
468:
465:
461:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
448:
444:
438:
435:
433:
432:
428:
426:
422:
419:
415:
412:
407:
405:
401:
398:
396:
387:
386:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
336:
333:
328:
324:
320:
318:
316:
313:
311:
309:
307:
304:
302:
299:
295:
291:
289:
286:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
131:
127:
126:
125:
124:
120:
118:
117:
114:
106:
104:
102:
94:
88:
85:
82:
79:
76:
72:
69:
68:
66:
59:
55:
51:
45:
40:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1007:
1004:
983:indefblocked
980:
966:
965:
939:
935:
932:
892:
879:
869:
845:
815:
807:
802:
801:
780:
727:
715:
711:
692:WP:Consensus
637:
613:
612:
610:
601:
592:
582:
573:
564:
560:
557:
553:
552:
430:
424:
417:
410:
403:
378:
237:WP:Consensus
163:"wierdo guy"
137:
110:
98:
83:
77:
57:
53:
47:
43:
35:
28:
897:Rodney King
895:an edit to
762:WP:Civility
732:Israeli PMs
668:WP:Civility
530:Rodney King
454:Gas chamber
323:this threat
222:WP:Civility
207:POV pushing
107:Description
962:Discussion
785:Keltik31's
770:Keltik31's
514:TheQuandry
934:suspect,
929:Summary 3
842:Summary 2
812:Summary 1
773:talk page
754:consensus
750:relations
728:unsourced
724:consensus
474:Nuremberg
458:Holocaust
991:Muchness
953:Goodlief
883:Keltik31
862:Keltik31
758:Keltik31
708:Keltik31
688:Keltik31
684:Keltik31
664:Keltik31
650:Keltik31
604:Keltik31
595:Keltik31
586:Keltik31
576:Keltik31
567:Keltik31
555:section.
549:Response
533:stopped.
431:IrishGuy
285:Db099221
113:Db099221
81:contribs
71:Keltik31
893:removed
789:OBriain
766:WP:NPOV
700:WP:NPOV
672:WP:NPOV
298:JoshuaZ
987:Addhoc
833:Spylab
819:Spylab
781:do not
747:Israel
739:Sharon
680:WP:NPA
631:weirdo
523:G Rose
506:Addhoc
381:weirdo
327:Ginkgo
58:single
804:view.
735:Begin
634:actor
384:actor
325:). --
16:<
995:talk
989:. --
940:need
764:and
743:U.S.
737:and
722:and
720:NPOV
716:fact
670:and
620:here
616:here
498:Eron
369:here
367:and
365:here
361:here
359:and
357:here
353:here
351:and
349:here
345:here
341:here
294:WP:V
87:logs
75:talk
54:same
967:All
936:not
714:or
704:NPA
347:,
331:100
997:)
775:.
420:.
413:.
283:--
65:.
33:.
993:(
745:-
644:)
642:-
639:-
626:-
623:-
392:-
389:-
376:-
373:-
128:[
89:)
84:·
78:·
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.