436:
Yes, sorry, I noticed it before seeing it linked here and figured removing a copyvio was more important than preserving evidence. If any further are found, I won't touch them. I think enough people know what's going on without maintaining a concrete piece of evidence, the user's comments betray that
38:
user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 16:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)), the
460:
Copyright is a very difficult thing to understand. It is perfectly OK that
Tcatron565 has had a hard time navigating it. As opposed to never uploading a picture again, in the future, Tcatron565, if he has any question about the legality of a picture whatsoever, instead of just uploading it, should
123:
The user is only just 18 and may simply not understand copyright law and
Knowledge's policy. However, the user has been warned over and over and over again over the past ten or twelve weeks and continues to upload copyrighted material. I am not sure what more can be done and am looking for some
522:
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside
277:
13:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC) - The user removed his images after I pointed out the copyright issue, but from edit history and talk page, it seems clear that he didn't absorb the information on copyright that I pointed him towards. I guess it's age/maturity.
361:. I'm sorry for all the violations. I swear I will never put pictures on this site again! I'll leave that to you guys above. That is mostly the problem. I will just put on basic correct text. For ex: I have put on the dates of the
461:
instead approach one of the endorsers of this RFC or the endorsers of this summary with a description of the picture and where he got the picture from, and ask them if the picture fits within our copyright policy.
549:. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.
247:
18:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC) - I think this is simply an age/maturity problem, but it is extremely difficult to communicate with someone who thinks using fifty exclamation points is helpful.
88:
has repeatedly violated
Knowledge's copyright policy, along with other policies. A quick viewing of the discussion page shows the user has been warned by at least the following users:
76:
This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.
132:(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
546:
143:
263:
exclamation marks in that diff, far more than the mere fifty you cite. Furthermore, the last one is in bold. I am shocked by this attempt to maul the truth. -
527:{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
153:
148:
138:
158:
437:
they have been uploading
Wunderground images, and the deletion logs show that they were uploaded with an unacceptable copyright license. --
57:
305:
with a note on his talk page. He didn't stop, and obviously readded the images, as Golbez had to remove them again later... --
30:, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the
362:
298:
27:
17:
102:
384:- latest image was uploaded after this "swear", without a source, and just syaing the image is copyrighted. --
259:
Well, this is the kind of deceit I think we have all come to expect from you, Golbez. There are actually
507:
498:
210:
189:
53:
510:
501:
492:
479:
441:
431:
405:
377:
326:
289:
267:
254:
239:
489:
472:
264:
112:
284:
374:
358:
85:
49:
485:
468:
421:
395:
316:
545:
signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to
302:
279:
274:
97:
438:
251:
244:
117:
297:
01:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC) - I also once removed some images he added to the
365:. If you people need to have me do something to improve a page, I'm your guy!
236:
92:
411:
385:
306:
294:
107:
66:
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
382:
248:
183:{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}
171:
167:
163:
200:
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
39:
page will be deleted. The current date and time is:
226:{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
530:Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
464:Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
368:Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
144:Special:Undelete/Image:Mostwantedsignedit.jpg
8:
221:Users certifying the basis for this dispute
154:Special:Undelete/Image:Grandfathersm.jpg
149:Special:Undelete/Image:Marvelcave2.jpg
139:Special:Undelete/Image:At20056_sat.jpg
506:I'm still new, but it sounds good. --
159:Special:Undelete/Image:Betastrike.gif
7:
335:Other users who endorse this summary
24:
410:Seems to have been deleted. --
299:2005 Atlantic hurricane season
41:10:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
28:Knowledge:Requests for comment
18:Knowledge:Requests for comment
1:
128:Evidence of disputed behavior
26:In order to remain listed at
502:13:24, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
493:19:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
480:18:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
442:18:59, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
432:05:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
406:01:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
378:16:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
327:01:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
290:13:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
268:20:04, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
261:four hundred and sixty-seven
255:18:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
240:16:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
547:this page's discussion page
511:16:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
563:
204:(provide diffs and links)
103:User:Extraordinary Machine
456:Outside view of Hipocrite
301:article and added him to
71:Statement of the dispute
211:User talk:Tcatron565
190:Knowledge:Copyrights
179:Applicable policies
303:WP:VIP#RU_Moderate
230:(sign with ~~~~)
476:
339:(sign with ~~~~)
288:
554:
474:
427:
424:
417:
414:
401:
398:
391:
388:
322:
319:
312:
309:
282:
42:
562:
561:
557:
556:
555:
553:
552:
551:
540:
519:
499:Robert McClenon
458:
430:
425:
422:
415:
412:
404:
399:
396:
389:
386:
363:2005 hurricanes
355:
337:
325:
320:
317:
310:
307:
223:
202:
181:
130:
113:User:Revolución
83:
73:
40:
34:dispute with a
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
560:
558:
539:
536:
535:
534:
518:
515:
514:
513:
504:
495:
482:
457:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
419:
393:
354:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
345:
336:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
314:
292:
272:
271:
270:
265:Ashley Pomeroy
242:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
213:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
192:
180:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
169:
165:
161:
156:
151:
146:
141:
129:
126:
121:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
82:
79:
72:
69:
63:
62:
61:
45:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
559:
550:
548:
544:
537:
533:
532:
531:
528:
525:
524:
516:
512:
509:
505:
503:
500:
497:Makes sense.
496:
494:
491:
487:
483:
481:
478:
470:
467:
466:
465:
462:
455:
443:
440:
435:
434:
433:
428:
418:
409:
408:
407:
402:
392:
383:
381:
380:
379:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
366:
364:
360:
352:
346:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
334:
328:
323:
313:
304:
300:
296:
293:
291:
286:
281:
276:
273:
269:
266:
262:
258:
257:
256:
253:
249:
246:
243:
241:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
227:
220:
214:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
199:
193:
191:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
178:
172:
170:
168:
166:
164:
162:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
127:
125:
124:suggestions.
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
80:
78:
77:
70:
68:
67:
59:
58:contributions
55:
51:
47:
46:
44:
37:
33:
29:
19:
542:
541:
529:
526:
521:
520:
517:Outside view
463:
459:
367:
356:
338:
260:
229:
225:
224:
203:
182:
131:
122:
98:User:Probell
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
35:
31:
25:
508:64.9.10.166
118:User:Golbez
81:Description
538:Discussion
375:Tcatron565
359:Tcatron565
93:User:Yamla
86:Tcatron565
50:Tcatron565
486:Linuxbeak
469:Hipocrite
108:User:NSLE
484:Agreed.
357:Hi, I'm
353:Response
426:nicate!
400:nicate!
321:nicate!
280:probell
275:probell
439:Golbez
252:Golbez
245:Golbez
36:single
523:view.
423:Commu
397:Commu
318:Commu
237:Yamla
16:<
490:Talk
475:Talk
295:NSLE
285:Talk
54:talk
32:same
543:All
488:|
471:-
416:LE
413:NS
390:LE
387:NS
311:LE
308:NS
250:--
56:|
52:|
43:.
477:»
473:«
429:)
420:(
403:)
394:(
324:)
315:(
287:)
283:(
278:/
60:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.