2327:
non-admin closures after speedy deletions. Yeah, you've got over 8,000 edits to
Knowledge (XXG) namespace, but I was easily back in September. I make one of the following conclusions: 1) You really haven't been thinking about and discussing the issues presented, or 2) You've hidden such edits under more "gnomish" edit summaries. AfD can make anyone look like an idiot. Occasionally you miss the obvious, or get proven dead wrong; but that's the experience I was looking for from someone who expressed an interest in XfD. You're very enthusiastic, but I just don't see the policy experience yet.
1758:
them to participate elsewhere? We need admins everywhere and this candidate seems quite focused. However, the candidate has expressed that they would try to participate elsewhere and if they do so voluntarily, than I suppose I can support them. I am also concerned about the very limited conflicts because conflict resolution is an important part of being an admin. Someone mentioned Q5 as not being completely correct but I'd like to empasize that the user did say "
2016:
community's faith in granting you those tools, it's maybe not so bad a thing this one time, this one area, but the risk, imo, when you have only one community function for those tools is simply too great. If you need the tools only to do one task that you're involved in, you need someone else to be the administrator for that task, im my experience and opinion. Administrator on wikipedia isn't a one function job. --
2386:: Learning toward support however, like A8UDI, I would like to see more detailed answers; especially question 1. Does the user only intend to use the tools for deleting? Also, I would like to see more diversity in the users focus; although I would never encourage someone to work an area they had no interest in.--
547:
Chances are that that comment was not posted when I saw the AfD. It could have been 7 minutes from the time that I saw the translusion on the AfD page to time I actually clicked to edit it. I do glance at the entire AfD before I non-admin close it, because I have come across situations where there is
266:
My understanding of this was an issue in my last RfA. I now know that cool down blocks are only acceptable if the editor in question is creating disruptive edits, and need the block to prevent further harm to the project. Although in that situation, it might not really be considered a cool down. They
2113:
Candidate seems very weak on content contributions and dispute resolution experience. Those are critical areas for admins and I think more well-rounded experience is needed. I don't recall seeing you helping at ANI or really in any other area of the 'Pedia. If tools could be split up for gnomic work
2053:
created unnecessary confusion and honestly I didn't get the impression he'd read the text of the AFD first, especially as he didn't respond to comment about it on his talk page. At any rate if an admin is going to close an AFD early despite a good faith request for it to run its normal course so the
2015:
I don't support one focus administrators. I saw this where an editor was granted adminship for being able to unblock his bots, then used his tools to unblock his bot that had been blocked with community consensus. If you're doing multiple things with your tools and you make a mistake by abusing the
1757:
This is a tough one for me. I see no reason to oppose, but I also had trouble supporting. I wish the candidate had more experience in other areas of the Wiki. The problem is that
Knowledge (XXG) is a volunteer community and if the user has no interest in other areas of the 'pedia, how can we ask
1503:
Was said above, might be somewhat gnomeish? I'd make a case that can be good for admin to mostly keep to him/herself and remain a relative unknown. End result is less biases and a substantial distance kept from the larger chunks of drama. I'd like to look at this as allowing the nominee to swoop in
619:
A ban is a formal way of saying that they are not allowed to edit, either temporarily or permanently; whether it be to a specific page, group of pages, or the entire project. Although a banned user is still technically able to edit a page, doing so may result in their account being blocked. A block
490:
Again, I think closing a discussion such as that would require much more experience, but from reading the policy, I would think that it would be better to err on the side of deleting it, and if another editor is able to support the burden of proof that the information is within the guidelines, they
1383:
MrKIA11 seems like a trustworthy, conscientious editor who would use the mop wisely. His work at WikiProject Video Games may be "gnoming," but it's important nonetheless and a job that doesn't get enough appreciation. The candidate also did an excellent job of answering the questions and fixed the
536:
you elected to perform a non-admin closure, despite the last comment made before your closure being "I asked the admin to undelete the article so the AFD can run and I can work on the article. presumably if I'd had time to unblank the article it wouldn't have met a CSD anyway, so I don't think DRV
511:
I think it seems quite thorough, and since I have not had much experience in dealing with it, I can't say I disagree with any of it. I do have a single person's page that I watch because of my relationship with them in real life, but I keep my edits to reverting vandalism, to avoid a unintentional
2455:
I originally opposed because of the lack of conflict resolution experience per Q13. (See also my reply to Amory above.) But I do appreciate his work with CSD; in the last 2000 edits I could not find a single wrong tag. Also, working with CSD can often get emotional, so it's a good sign that the
2326:
I've looked through your last 600 or so edits to
Knowledge (XXG) namespace. I saw lots and lots of edits to AfD's. However, I didn't see one that actually expressed an opinion or discussed policy. Every one I saw was either tagging as a video game related discussion, fixing headers, or doing
194:
pages, which I constantly update and always look to improve if possible (e.g., the new class status icon for every page). I also tag every new page with the project's template, quickly check what information I can add to the infobox, especially boxart, and clean it up to conform with article
902:
I'm sure
Sandstein has a valid reason for ask question 9 (one I partly agree with), but surely something personal like that is not required for Knowledge (XXG). Regardless of his answer, I think MrKIA11 has shown a mature personality that the question doesn't warrant an answer.
540:
Can you clarify why you decided a non-admin closure was warranted here? (Full disclosure. I'm aware the statement I reference and your closure are only 7 minutes apart. I also know policy allows a non-admin closure in cases where the nominated article has been deleted.)
395:. He does not establish notability outside of the incident. The winery section is about the winery, not him. His polo career and legal problems are not unlike that of thousands of other people. Any little information left about him can be included in the incident's page.
195:
guidelines. I look at every entry on the AfD page, and fix any minor problems that I notice (i.e., malformed headers, incomplete nominations, deleted articles whose AfD have not been closed). I also work to keep the info on the various pages of the WikiProject (i.e.,
157:
I will be using the tools for cleaning up pages, such as deleting pages that fall under CSD or have come to a consensus for deletion in a XfD. I will also use the tools to deal with problematic editors that I come across. Although I admittedly do not currently visit
1587:
Despite not having many interactions with this user in the past, I'm going to have to support this. I'm extremely impressed by the well reasoned answers, especially number 8. Looking over the contributions, I'm convinced that this user will use the tools wisely.
343:
could be considered for deletion. If the view of the essay contradicts the widespread consensus or is rarely referred to can be userfied. Essays should also be userfied if the editor does not wish others to edit it, but generally the editor can take care of that
1762:
any complete sentance" which is a valid answer. And if the strongest oppose for this candidate is slightly weak answers, low conflict resolution, and a small perceived inaccuracy in his response to G1, well adminship is no big deal and so I support.--v/r -
398:
Although this is how I would close the discussion today, I would not attempt such a close without more experience first. And for those that are more experienced, could this article be userfied until it thoroughly cleaned, and then reintroduced to the main
620:
actually prevents them technically from being able to edit, and can also be temporary or permanent, but always applies to the entire project. Blocks are one way of enforcing a ban, when they are project wide, but are normally used to deal with vandalism.
2244:– answer to Q3 is so vague that I half wonder if it intended to convey no information whatsoever. Q1 doesn't inspire me with huge confidence either, unfortunately. (I'll watch this page, and am quite prepared to change my position if so persuaded!)
1092:, I believe MrKIA11 having an extra set of tools will only help Knowledge (XXG). He took the last nomination in stride and has only improved since. My interactions with him have given me a lot of faith in his ability to use the tools properly. (
320:
Are there restrictions on the kinds of
Knowledge (XXG)-related essays that users may write in the project namespace? Are there any grounds on which you would delete such an essay? Are there any grounds on which you would userfy such an essay?
283:
G1 refers to unsalvageable content that simply can not be edited in any way to make it understandable. The subject can not be identified, and often the words are just gibberish. Almost anything that has a complete sentence does not fall under
2417:- Not sure yet. Editors that show an interest in CSD should have a healthy page patrol contribution, which shows they've seen a fair share of articles and understand how pages start out, both good and bad. This user has almost 900
2290:
Ah, thanks for pointing that out! I'll have a read through a little later... However, my concerns regarding Q3 were specifically about the answer given, and whether MrKIA genuinely thought that it was clear and open.
405:. It has the potential to be a good list. Once it has actually been thoroughly sourced and cleaned to remove all BLP violations, maintenance should not be a problem. The page receives a significant number of views.
2171:
That's why I asked Q13. I did not expect not to get at least an attempt of an answer in over 24 hours. Well, I guess the candidate is so sure to win that he doesn't care. Well, I have to vote my conscience. —
584:
Speaking of conflict, we apparently had an edit conflict, as I voted just the minute you replied here. But what I meant by my question was whether you helped resolve any conflicts between others. —
191:
267:
are not acceptable if the editor has only voiced themselves in a discussion, no matter how angry they may be. This is also a general guideline, and each situation must be analyzed individually.
548:
a second page being nominated that hasn't been dealt with, or some other reason for the AfD not to be closed yet. I don't remember the situation exactly, but I'm guessing that's what happened.
573:
I can't say I remember resolving any large conflicts, but of course I've answered the minor questions that have come up due to edits I made. These can been seen in my talk page archives (
144:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
231:
The only conflict I have had was regarding edits in
Userspace, but that was over a year ago. No conflicts since then. I believe that every conflict can be resolved with discussion.
2199:
OK, I believe you that you care, since you replied the same minute that I posted the above. However, your reply here seems to be tweaking the facts a bit. The relevant link is
2222:
Striking part, since I realized that the candidate replied to my clumsy wording of the previous post. There is indeed no requirement to check RfA at least once in 24 hours. —
2050:
533:
304:
I now use an edit summary for every edit, which was a concern for some before. I have also contributed much more in cleaning AfDs, both related and unrelated to video games.
111:. While he’s more of a wikigrome when it comes to article creation, it’s clear he still has experience in that area. I think MrKIA11 would make an excellent administrator.
2475:
225:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1200:– I was thinking about nominating myself. Does very good "behind the scenes" work that people readily won't notice. We would benefit with him having the admin tools.
1823:
While this user hasn't produced any large amount of audited content, I have seen firsthand how many grinding, gnomish edits he makes and what a benefit they are to
887:
No comment on this RfA yet, but the last one stands as an embarrassment to the community in my opinion. MrKIA11 deserved better than the treatment he got there.
2114:
that would be okay, but interpersonal skills and experience are needed when they can be used and abused to make improper blocks of content contributors. Cheers.
832:
640:
187:
827:
2420:
which is more than most, but for over 29,000 edits it's not huge percentage. Answer to 5A isn't completely correct, for instance an article that just said "
635:
295:
96:
2493:
327:
Although essays are one of the most freely written pages on the project, there are some limitations. Pages that violate specific defined policies (i.e.,
2276:(and the three subsequent threads). That was in January 2008, almost two years ago. The candidate has certainly gained a lot of experience since then.
681:
2421:
770:
1575:
668:
87:
386:
It should be kept in mind that merged pages can always be branched out again in the future if more information warrants it's own article.
1946:
1049:, I nominated him last year, and he's been really amazing in his consistant and quality maintenance work for WP:VG throughout the year.
391:
711:
33:
17:
2157:
1548:
1486:
705:
822:
2305:
2258:
936:, does excellent work in delsorting and AfD, with a few extra tools the candidate would be able to aid the project even further. --
99:
over a year ago was because of lack of experience, but it’s no longer a problem, closing AFDs other administrators forget to close
1264:
414:. Even when all the SPA votes are removed, there are still good points for inclusion, although it could use some better sourcing.
675:
2418:
2281:
1389:
1371:
1134:. Great work thus far, excellent answers to additional questions, and I trust the candidate to use the tools responsibly. --
2072:
On second thought, the initial comment I left on his talk page was snarky and that might very well be why he ignored it. --
360:
How would you close these deletion discussions, in the state linked to? Please answer even if you voted or intend to vote.
90:
where he organizes its articles deletion debates, among other tough work in one of the projects least appreciated subjects
737:
720:
661:
83:
1443:
Taking your word that you will help vandal fighters such as me on wp:rpp, wp:aiv and wp:uaa when you get the tools down.
1995:
1827:. All my interactions with him have been positive, so I see no reason not to give the benefit of the doubt and support.
989:
2211:
homework (in this case checking your contributions before writing the above) indicates good conflict resolution skills.
2273:
858:
848:
578:
574:
2204:
I also don't think that a wording that wrongly gives the impression that the user your replying to hadn't been doing
1923:. I've seen this user's work and remember being impressed with his forbearance and diligence. Plus, good answers.
1020:
2202:, which shows that you have been online for an hour before replying here, during which time you did 14 other edits.
1942:
1007:
1929:
1012:
2277:
2119:
2077:
2063:
2021:
1964:
1385:
763:
312:
1873:
1570:
796:
2441:
Per Q4. Cool down blocks only have the opposite effect. Would oppose, but otherwise the candidate seems fine.
2339:
817:
1991:
196:
2446:
2151:
1632:
1542:
1480:
880:
812:
2335:
524:
212:
2299:
2252:
1924:
1863:
2474:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
733:
86:) – MrKIA11 has been in the project since September 2007, and has over 27,000 edits. He is a member of
2460:
2450:
2433:
2404:
2377:
2343:
2314:
2285:
2267:
2226:
2217:
2194:
2176:
2166:
2132:
2123:
2099:
2081:
2067:
2039:
2025:
2000:
1968:
1950:
1933:
1915:
1898:
1867:
1850:
1833:
1815:
1787:
1770:
1749:
1721:
1704:
1677:
1660:
1644:
1626:
1608:
1582:
1554:
1520:
1495:
1458:
1435:
1414:
1393:
1375:
1352:
1325:
1308:
1288:
1271:
1248:
1221:
1204:
1192:
1176:
1160:
1143:
1126:
1110:
1096:
1080:
1041:
1024:
1001:
981:
967:
945:
918:
907:
896:
882:
588:
565:
448:
133:
115:
2429:
2401:
2391:
2115:
2073:
2059:
2017:
1960:
1767:
1741:
1603:
1284:
1257:
1139:
994:
756:
106:. He has a good understand of our fairuse policy, unlike most other editors dealing with his subject
2424:" wouldn't qualify, but "Colorless orange ideas sleep furiously" would (I wouldn't oppose on that).
332:
1846:
1656:
1565:
1516:
1406:
1344:
1056:
791:
247:
1796:
328:
2457:
2223:
2214:
2173:
2129:
1978:
1717:
1365:
1331:
1201:
585:
562:
505:
What is your opinion on the current BLP policy, and what work have you done (if any) with BLPs?
369:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of male performers in gay porn films (5th nomination)
208:
204:
200:
2442:
2190:
2145:
2095:
2035:
1783:
1623:
1531:
1508:
is projected somewhere over the encyclopedia. ...Sounds a bit more heroic that way, at least.
1474:
1093:
977:
963:
915:
904:
892:
873:
655:
605:
129:
77:
2030:
I see several "ifs" and "this one guy did something" but nothing relevant to this candidate.
1422:. MrKIA11 has a good understanding of the policies and has experience in the relevant areas.
336:
2294:
2247:
1885:
1859:
1828:
1637:
1321:
1217:
1169:
1156:
1071:
1037:
941:
2334:(If someone can show diffs that prove me wrong, I will happily retract this entire vote.)
1891:
1184:
Haven't personally interacted or recall seeing him around, but I trust he'll do just fine.
1011:- The user already solved all of the concerns from the last RfA, and his history is great.
513:
492:
477:
340:
167:
163:
159:
2425:
2398:
2387:
2370:
1808:
1764:
1730:
1673:
1451:
1300:
1280:
1243:
1135:
972:
Changing to weak support per answer to Q4. Cool down blocks are never acceptable, period.
433:
408:
This seems to be an easy keep. I assume you picked because of the extreme SPA involvement?
352:
1824:
1778:
as now ready to have the mop. Plenty of edits, good answers above, and resolved issues.
2058:
explanation. Note that the article was saved once I had time to actually work on it. --
1908:
1842:
1697:
1652:
1513:
1399:
1339:
1124:
1107:
1051:
439:
424:
242:
2128:
This is a concern I take seriously. Do you have any evidence you can show for this? —
1528:
I like what I see in the edits the candidate has made, and with the answers given. --
2487:
1713:
1433:
1361:
1305:
1297:
2186:
2091:
2090:
your first comment with "nevermind", I didn't feel it would be rude to not answer.
2031:
1779:
1618:
1597:
973:
959:
888:
651:
125:
73:
1384:
issues raised at the last RfA. Thanks for your hard work, MrKIA11, and good luck.
2205:
1636:- Great candidate; nothing tells me that I can't trust this user with the tools!
1879:
1317:
1213:
1186:
1152:
1066:
1033:
937:
853:
465:
112:
107:
58:
54:
2363:
1802:
1669:
1505:
1444:
1231:
2468:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
170:
very often, I will try to become more involved in those fields in the future.
1688:
1119:
1795:
this strangely low traffic request for the bits. Nod to the opposers but a
1118:— diligent and hardworking editor with a demonstrable need for the tools. –
1423:
484:), where there is no easily determined consensus how would you close it?
186:
My best contributions are in the video game department, specifically the
2272:
TreasuryTag, I think the conflict MrKIA11 is referring to is the one at
1591:
1335:- Good answers to my question. What I wanted! Good luck with your RfA.
1032:- MrKIA11 is a cool guy, eh sorts AfDs and doesn't afraid of anything.
2478:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
2360:
Leaning towards support, but am waiting for more detailed answers.
2137:
I think the very issue is the lack of evidence to the contrary. ~
748:
277:
In your own words, describe the G1 Criteria for Speedy
Deletion.
2456:
candidate hasn't been involved in any conflicts in that time. —
958:
Concerns I had from previous RFA no longer exist. So go for it.
61:
752:
374:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Uwe Kils (2nd nomination)
1616:- no problems here, seems to have provided suitable answers.
180:
What are your best contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), and why?
2054:
article can be saved... I really think the admin should make
122:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1279:
The response to question 8 in particular was encouraging.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
151:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
2200:
2182:
2087:
1103:
1089:
699:
693:
687:
481:
373:
368:
363:
109:
104:
102:
100:
93:
91:
2051:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Barrington Plaza
1466:
Thought this guy was a bot for the longest time... ~
1360:- balance of evidence suggests will be net positive.
561:: Do you have experience with conflict resolution? —
841:
805:
784:
1959:logs and contributions show the skills are there.
364:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Tareq Salahi
613:What's the difference between a ban and a block?
2274:User talk:MrKIA11/Archive 1#Archive box changes
764:
8:
1168:Looking forward to seeing your work at AfD.
718:Edit summary usage for MrKIA11 can be found
2086:That was part of the reason. And since you
1229:– I have no concerns about this editor. --
1858:. Fully qualified candidate, no concerns.
771:
757:
749:
914:Nevermind, he answered before I posted. (
871:Editing stats posted at the talk page. –
732:Please keep discussion constructive and
633:
88:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games
260:When are Cool Down Blocks acceptable?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
2422:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously
1668:Good answerers to the questions...
1106:and support again. Excellent editor.
7:
1316:-can someone realy tell why not!?--
632:
604:Additional optional questions from
463:Additional optional questions from
392:2009 White House gatecrash incident
351:Additional optional questions from
311:Additional optional questions from
476:If you were to close an AFD, on a
24:
2494:Successful requests for adminship
641:Requests for adminship/MrKIA11 2
1712:Is now ready. A net positive -
593:No, I can't say I remember any.
2394:) 23:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
636:Requests for adminship/MrKIA11
294:What have you done since your
1:
2181:I actually do care, I'm just
738:Special:Contributions/MrKIA11
2461:18:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2451:20:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
2434:08:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
2405:15:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2378:03:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
2344:15:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
2315:17:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
2286:16:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
2268:15:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
2227:18:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2218:17:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2195:17:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2177:17:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2167:16:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2133:05:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2124:22:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
2100:14:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
2082:04:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
2068:04:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
2040:21:57, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
2026:01:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
2001:22:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
1969:21:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
1951:20:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
1934:18:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
1916:02:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
1899:21:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
1868:16:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
1851:05:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
1834:23:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1816:22:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1788:19:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1771:15:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1750:08:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1722:04:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1705:02:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1678:22:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1661:20:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1645:06:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1627:05:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1609:04:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1583:03:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1555:17:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
1521:17:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
1496:04:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
1459:21:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1436:21:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1415:20:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1394:16:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1376:07:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1353:07:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1326:06:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1309:00:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1289:22:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1272:22:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1249:19:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1222:19:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1205:19:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1193:18:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1177:17:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1161:17:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1144:17:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1127:16:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1111:16:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1097:15:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1081:13:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1042:09:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1025:05:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
1002:02:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
982:17:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
968:00:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
946:00:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
919:18:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
908:18:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
897:04:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
883:00:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
589:17:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
581:), if you so feel inclined.
566:09:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
449:18:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
134:22:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
116:21:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
140:Questions for the candidate
2510:
1841:Seems capable and ready...
238:Additional questions from
53:Final (51/4/3); Closed by
2183:not always on my computer
1943:Santa Claus of the Future
1830:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
95:. The main concern from,
2471:Please do not modify it.
2397:Moved to support--v/r -
1941:I see no problems here.
456:Yes, by 2 years; I'm 20.
124:I accept the nomination
1976:. Good luck as sysop!
1877:- Per answer to Q10. --
993:per nom, and history.--
537:should be needed here."
38:Please do not modify it
436:in your jurisdiction?
383:Wow, what a question.
341:Knowledge (XXG) is not
1504:and respond when the
1151:Seems alright to me.
1015:December21st2012Freak
432:Have you reached the
339:) or fall under what
34:request for adminship
2278:A Stop at Willoughby
1386:A Stop at Willoughby
854:Global contributions
333:copyright violations
313:A Stop at Willoughby
818:Non-automated edits
649:Links for MrKIA11:
631:RfAs for this user:
555:Conflict resolution
1729:No problems here.
1625:
797:Edit summary usage
740:before commenting.
39:
2407:
2362:Move to support.
2185:on the weekends.
2164:
1932:
1897:
1814:
1617:
1607:
1493:
1413:
1268:
1172:Aditya Ex Machina
1065:I see no alarms.
1062:
1061:• 2009-12-3 12:49
867:
866:
470:
447:
37:
2501:
2473:
2396:
2375:
2368:
2313:
2310:
2309:
2302:
2297:
2266:
2263:
2262:
2255:
2250:
2210:
2208:
2165:
2160:
2154:
2148:
2142:
2140:
2088:quickly followed
1987:
1986:
1983:
1928:
1925:Accounting4Taste
1911:
1894:
1888:
1878:
1831:
1813:
1811:
1800:
1799:with the tools.
1703:
1700:
1640:
1621:
1600:
1594:
1589:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1551:
1545:
1537:
1534:
1519:
1494:
1489:
1483:
1477:
1471:
1469:
1456:
1449:
1432:
1428:
1411:
1404:
1398:
1350:
1347:
1342:
1303:
1269:
1266:
1261:
1246:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1189:
1174:
1153:Kevin Rutherford
1078:
1069:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1017:
999:
876:
813:Articles created
773:
766:
759:
750:
723:
715:
674:
627:General comments
464:
446:
444:
437:
329:personal attacks
253:
250:
245:
2509:
2508:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2476:this nomination
2469:
2371:
2364:
2354:
2307:
2306:
2300:
2295:
2292:
2260:
2259:
2253:
2248:
2245:
2206:
2158:
2152:
2146:
2141:
2138:
2116:ChildofMidnight
2074:Sancho Mandoval
2060:Sancho Mandoval
2049:his closure of
2018:IP69.226.103.13
2009:
1984:
1981:
1980:
1961:Graeme Bartlett
1909:
1892:
1886:
1882:
1829:
1809:
1801:
1698:
1686:
1638:
1619:
1598:
1592:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1549:
1543:
1535:
1532:
1512:
1487:
1481:
1475:
1470:
1467:
1452:
1445:
1430:
1424:
1407:
1400:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1337:
1301:
1265:
1259:
1256:Excellent user
1244:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1187:
1170:
1072:
1067:
1057:
1052:
1013:
997:Coldplay Expért
995:
930:
874:
868:
863:
837:
801:
780:
779:RfA/RfB toolbox
777:
747:
719:
667:
650:
646:
629:
491:can take it to
468:
440:
438:
434:age of majority
410:The result was
401:The result was
388:The result was
252:
248:
243:
240:
142:
71:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2507:
2505:
2497:
2496:
2486:
2485:
2481:
2480:
2464:
2463:
2453:
2436:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2380:
2353:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2336:Bradjamesbrown
2329:
2328:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2220:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2042:
2008:
2005:
2004:
2003:
1971:
1953:
1936:
1918:
1901:
1880:
1870:
1853:
1836:
1818:
1790:
1773:
1752:
1724:
1707:
1680:
1663:
1647:
1629:
1611:
1585:
1557:
1523:
1498:
1461:
1438:
1417:
1396:
1378:
1355:
1338:
1328:
1311:
1291:
1274:
1251:
1224:
1207:
1195:
1179:
1163:
1146:
1129:
1113:
1100:
1090:Like last time
1083:
1063:
1044:
1027:
1004:
986:
985:
984:
948:
929:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
899:
885:
865:
864:
862:
861:
856:
851:
845:
843:
839:
838:
836:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
809:
807:
803:
802:
800:
799:
794:
788:
786:
782:
781:
778:
776:
775:
768:
761:
753:
746:
743:
729:
728:
727:
725:
716:
645:
644:
643:
638:
630:
628:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
608:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
538:
527:
525:Bradjamesbrown
520:
519:
518:
517:
499:
498:
497:
496:
471:
466:
460:
459:
458:
457:
427:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
409:
406:
400:
396:
387:
377:
376:
371:
366:
355:
348:
347:
346:
345:
315:
308:
307:
306:
305:
288:
287:
286:
285:
271:
270:
269:
268:
255:
241:
235:
234:
233:
232:
219:
218:
217:
216:
174:
173:
172:
171:
141:
138:
137:
136:
70:
67:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2506:
2495:
2492:
2491:
2489:
2479:
2477:
2472:
2466:
2465:
2462:
2459:
2454:
2452:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2412:
2406:
2403:
2400:
2395:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2374:
2369:
2367:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2351:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2325:
2322:
2316:
2311:
2303:
2298:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2264:
2256:
2251:
2243:
2240:
2228:
2225:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2212:
2201:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2175:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2163:
2161:
2155:
2149:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2112:
2109:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2052:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2014:
2011:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1999:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1931:
1926:
1922:
1919:
1917:
1913:
1912:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1895:
1889:
1883:
1876:
1875:
1871:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1812:
1806:
1805:
1798:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1753:
1751:
1748:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1739:
1736:
1733:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1701:
1695:
1694:
1692:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1628:
1624:
1622:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1605:
1601:
1595:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1574:
1569:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1552:
1546:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1518:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1492:
1490:
1484:
1478:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1450:
1448:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1429:
1427:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1412:
1410:
1405:
1403:
1397:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1348:
1343:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1263:
1262:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1242:
1241:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1212:No problems.
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1076:
1070:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1003:
1000:
998:
992:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
954:
953:
949:
947:
943:
939:
935:
932:
931:
927:
920:
917:
913:
912:
911:
909:
906:
900:
898:
894:
890:
886:
884:
881:
878:
877:
870:
869:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
846:
844:
840:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
810:
808:
804:
798:
795:
793:
790:
789:
787:
783:
774:
769:
767:
762:
760:
755:
754:
751:
744:
742:
741:
739:
735:
726:
722:
717:
713:
710:
707:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
683:
680:
677:
673:
670:
666:
663:
660:
657:
653:
648:
647:
642:
639:
637:
634:
626:
618:
615:
614:
612:
609:
607:
603:
602:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
582:
580:
576:
572:
569:
568:
567:
564:
560:
557:
554:
553:
546:
543:
542:
539:
535:
531:
528:
526:
522:
521:
515:
510:
507:
506:
504:
501:
500:
494:
489:
486:
485:
483:
479:
475:
472:
469:
462:
461:
455:
452:
451:
450:
445:
443:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
421:
413:
407:
404:
397:
394:
393:
385:
384:
382:
379:
378:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
361:
359:
356:
354:
350:
349:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
322:
319:
316:
314:
310:
309:
303:
300:
299:
297:
293:
290:
289:
282:
279:
278:
276:
273:
272:
265:
262:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
246:
237:
236:
230:
227:
226:
224:
221:
220:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
189:
185:
182:
181:
179:
176:
175:
169:
165:
161:
156:
153:
152:
150:
147:
146:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
110:
108:
105:
103:
101:
98:
94:
92:
89:
85:
82:
79:
75:
68:
66:
65:
63:
60:
56:
48:
45:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2470:
2467:
2443:Doc Quintana
2438:
2414:
2383:
2382:
2372:
2365:
2359:
2323:
2241:
2203:
2143:
2110:
2055:
2045:
2044:
2012:
1979:
1977:
1973:
1956:
1938:
1920:
1907:
1903:
1872:
1855:
1838:
1820:
1803:
1797:net positive
1792:
1775:
1759:
1755:Weak support
1754:
1745:
1742:
1737:
1734:
1731:
1726:
1709:
1690:
1689:
1682:
1665:
1649:
1642:
1631:
1613:
1567:bibliomaniac
1564:
1563:
1559:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1509:
1500:
1472:
1463:
1453:
1446:
1440:
1425:
1419:
1408:
1401:
1380:
1368:
1357:
1336:
1330:
1313:
1293:
1276:
1258:
1253:
1230:
1226:
1209:
1197:
1185:
1181:
1171:
1165:
1148:
1131:
1120:
1115:
1102:I supported
1094:Guyinblack25
1085:
1074:
1073:
1046:
1029:
1014:
1006:
996:
988:
956:Weak Support
955:
951:
950:
933:
916:Guyinblack25
905:Guyinblack25
901:
875:Juliancolton
872:
731:
730:
708:
702:
696:
690:
684:
678:
671:
664:
658:
616:
610:
606:Addihockey10
570:
558:
544:
529:
523:Question by
508:
502:
487:
473:
453:
441:
429:
423:Question by
411:
402:
389:
380:
357:
324:
317:
301:
298:to improve?
296:previous RfA
291:
280:
274:
263:
257:
239:
228:
222:
183:
177:
154:
148:
143:
121:
97:his last RFA
80:
72:
52:
51:
46:
30:
28:
2242:Weak oppose
1860:Newyorkbrad
1685:of course!
1639:Airplaneman
859:User rights
849:CentralAuth
480:, (such as
344:themselves.
192:new article
59:10 December
2426:Shadowjams
2388:TParis00ap
1906:I guess --
1887:have a cup
1506:Bat signal
1281:WFCforLife
1260:Triplestop
1136:Mpdelbuono
842:Cross-wiki
833:AfD closes
745:Discussion
442:Sandstein
353:Triplestop
215:) in sync.
69:Nomination
57:at 01:56,
31:successful
2458:Sebastian
2224:Sebastian
2215:Sebastian
2174:Sebastian
2130:Sebastian
1910:Zink Dawg
1843:Modernist
1653:Andrea105
1514:daTheisen
1108:Acalamari
1104:last time
828:AfD votes
823:BLP edits
694:block log
586:Sebastian
563:Sebastian
425:Sandstein
390:Merge to
2488:Category
2296:Treasury
2261:quaestor
2249:Treasury
1714:Ret.Prof
1710:Support:
1550:contribs
1372:contribs
1362:Casliber
1341:Smithers
1202:MuZemike
806:Analysis
785:Counters
662:contribs
534:this AfD
512:case of
244:Smithers
188:deletion
84:contribs
2439:Neutral
2415:Neutral
2384:Neutral
2352:Neutral
2308:senator
2187:MrKIA11
2092:MrKIA11
2032:Vodello
1982:TheWeak
1974:Support
1957:Support
1939:Support
1921:Support
1904:Support
1874:Support
1856:Support
1839:Support
1821:Support
1793:Support
1780:Bearian
1776:Support
1727:Support
1683:Support
1666:Support
1650:Support
1633:Support
1620:Cocytus
1614:Support
1560:Support
1533:Phantom
1526:Support
1501:Support
1464:Support
1441:Support
1420:Support
1381:Support
1358:Support
1332:Support
1314:Support
1294:Support
1277:Support
1254:Support
1227:Support
1210:Support
1198:Support
1182:Support
1166:Support
1149:Support
1132:Support
1116:Support
1086:Support
1047:Support
1030:Support
1008:Support
990:Support
974:Vodello
960:Vodello
952:Support
934:Support
928:Support
889:Protonk
669:deleted
652:MrKIA11
126:MrKIA11
74:MrKIA11
47:MrKIA11
2324:Oppose
2111:Oppose
2046:Oppose
2013:Oppose
2007:Oppose
1985:Willed
1881:Coffee
1760:almost
1517:(talk)
1409:(talk)
1346:(Talk)
1318:Gilisa
1298:hahnch
1214:Warrah
1034:Nifboy
938:Taelus
792:XTools
577:&
514:WP:COI
493:WP:DRV
467:Coffee
399:space?
249:(Talk)
168:WP:RPP
164:WP:UAA
160:WP:AIV
113:Secret
55:Rlevse
2139:Amory
1825:WP:VG
1810:Chat
1804:Pedro
1670:RP459
1602:) ·
1536:Steve
1468:Amory
1402:@Kate
1058:PLANE
734:civil
676:count
532:: In
166:, or
64:(UTC)
16:<
2447:talk
2430:talk
2392:talk
2340:talk
2282:talk
2191:talk
2120:talk
2096:talk
2078:talk
2064:talk
2056:some
2036:talk
2022:talk
1965:talk
1947:talk
1930:talk
1864:talk
1847:talk
1784:talk
1718:talk
1699:Talk
1674:talk
1657:talk
1604:@220
1599:talk
1544:talk
1390:talk
1366:talk
1322:talk
1285:talk
1218:talk
1188:Grsz
1157:talk
1140:talk
1121:xeno
1053:JACO
1038:talk
1021:talk
978:talk
964:talk
942:talk
893:talk
721:here
706:rfar
688:logs
656:talk
482:this
412:Keep
403:Keep
337:spam
190:and
130:talk
78:talk
62:2009
2373:UDI
2301:Tag
2254:Tag
2209:eir
1914:--
1896://
1893:ark
1890://
1884://
1746:ame
1693:oJo
1454:UDI
1426:Axl
1068:Ged
712:spi
682:AfD
611:14.
503:11.
478:BLP
474:10.
284:G1.
2490::
2449:)
2432:)
2366:A8
2342:)
2312:─╢
2293:╟─
2284:)
2265:─╢
2246:╟─
2213:—
2207:th
2193:)
2156:•
2150:•
2122:)
2098:)
2080:)
2066:)
2038:)
2024:)
1994:*
1967:)
1949:)
1866:)
1849:)
1807::
1786:)
1743:fl
1738:or
1732:Ra
1720:)
1702:•
1696:•
1687:—
1676:)
1659:)
1606:·
1596:·
1593:X!
1562:.
1553:\
1485:•
1479:•
1447:A8
1392:)
1374:)
1324:)
1296:-
1287:)
1267:x3
1236:am
1233:At
1220:)
1159:)
1142:)
1088::
1075:UK
1040:)
1023:)
980:)
966:)
944:)
895:)
879:|
700:lu
617:A:
571:A:
559:13
545:A:
530:12
509:A.
488:A.
454:A:
430:9.
381:A:
358:8.
335:,
331:,
325:A:
318:7.
302:A.
292:6.
281:A.
275:5.
264:A:
258:4.
229:A:
223:3.
211:,
207:,
203:,
199:,
184:A:
178:2.
162:,
155:A:
149:1.
132:)
36:.
2445:(
2428:(
2402:P
2399:T
2390:(
2338:(
2304:►
2280:(
2257:►
2189:(
2162:)
2159:c
2153:t
2147:u
2144:(
2118:(
2094:(
2076:(
2062:(
2034:(
2020:(
1998:)
1996:G
1992:T
1990:(
1963:(
1955:'
1945:(
1927::
1862:(
1845:(
1782:(
1768:P
1765:T
1735:z
1716:(
1691:J
1672:(
1655:(
1590:(
1577:5
1572:1
1547:|
1541:/
1510:♪
1491:)
1488:c
1482:t
1476:u
1473:(
1431:¤
1388:(
1369:·
1364:(
1320:(
1306:n
1302:e
1283:(
1245:頭
1239:a
1216:(
1155:(
1138:(
1099:)
1036:(
1019:(
976:(
962:(
940:(
921:)
910:)
903:(
891:(
772:e
765:t
758:v
724:.
714:)
709:·
703:·
697:·
691:·
685:·
679:·
672:·
665:·
659:·
654:(
579:2
575:1
516:.
495:.
213:5
209:4
205:3
201:2
197:1
128:(
81:·
76:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.