Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Ocaasi

1077:

page, where the details were being thrashed out) might put me in a position to offer useful input. For what it's worth, I personally valued Ocaasi's contributions there, as keeping a cool head in a sometimes tricky circumstances (there was a lot of political POV-pushing, and some rather unsavoury implications that contributors were engaging in 'censorship' on behalf of - well on behalf of whoever the POV-pusher disagreed with), and as a fine example of a contributor maintaining focus on the long-term encyclopaedic objectives of Knowledge (XXG), rather than near-tabloid recentism. So I won't 'tell anyone how to vote', and neither will I vote myself (just in case anyone wishes to suggest that KW canvassed me - though that clearly wasn't his intent) - instead, I'll suggest that if you are in any doubt as to Ocaasi's suitability as an admin, take a look at the Assange talk page archives for yourself, and then ask yourself whether Ocaasi has the characteristics you'd like to see in someone given the tools to keep the rest of us focussed on the job in hand.

224:

tried to see things from other people's point of view, learn more about the underlying/relevant policies, and formulate informed responses. I like to turn seeming enemies into allies by talking with them about disagreements, finding common ground, and showing them respect. While I internally get caught up in the intensity of disagreement sometimes, very rarely if at all does that come across in how I communicate to others. In the future, I will try to step away from a topic when I'm really heated about it, recognizing that there's no rush to answer immediately or resolve every issue perfectly--use the iterative process of Knowledge (XXG) to allow for changes to zig zag towards a solution even if there's not a smooth path there--and remember that this is a great community of people who want to do something good, important, and even enjoyable--and that reasonable people can disagree.

484:

to get at the real people behind conflicts. I've found several paid editors to be upstanding contributors with good intentions who take care in following policies. It's the bad actors I've never met who are more concerning, but I am trying to bring them into the light all the same. I understand that some see paid editing as a plague we need to urgently protect ourselves from; meanwhile, I try to look for overlap of interests that we can leverage and utilize for our benefit. I believe in full disclosure and robust oversight and listening to even those whose aims might seem to be in conflict with ours. I also think its our responsibility to be responsive to critics and that includes the for-profit world. To get a better idea of what that might look like from my perspective, take a look at

678:

anti-vandal patrolling which definitely inflated my edit count. I also tend to make many small edits and frequently revise my writing through many minor changes. That inflates the count as well. On the other hand, I often draft articles in my userspace, which reduces the article space count significantly. All said, I think I've done a solid amount of article writing, somewhere in the several thousands of good edits. I hope this doesn't sound preachy, but try not to focus too much on numeric guidelines--they're just guidelines. Spend your time reading policies, finding content you can improve, adding references, meeting other editors, mastering specific maintenance tasks, or getting comfortable with discussion forums. I really like the advice

271:. I usually resolve disputes by talking extensively and civilly. I've learned that even the loudest, harshest critics may have a point; that it's useful to bring in experienced, knowledgeable, uninvolved editors; that sometimes you can only persuade the audience; that it's possible to walk away from a dispute on even better terms with your critics than you started; that it pays to focus on policy, content, and sources rather than the person's motives; that you really should *read* the actual details of policy and not base decisions off of a nutshell synopsis of it; that you have to stand up for your positions but not be blinded by the possibility that you're wrong; that 4780:

are discussing an article rather than a fellow editor, so if an AFD is cluttered with votes that don't add anything to the debate it doesn't really matter as articles don't have feelings. Just occasionally you will get a situation where people have to have it explained to them why one policy based argument in one direction in an AFD outweighs innumerable votes without rationales in the opposite direction. But in general AFD votes without rationales are a sign that someone new is taking an interest in the process, and hopefully if they stick around they will quickly pick up ways of making their !vote meaningful.

474:(replying further:) Your concern is understandable and I don't hold your suspicion against you. I won't deny that being fairly broke and very dedicated to this site that I at least thought of what it would mean to edit for profit. I decided a while ago that it wasn't worth losing the community's trust, risking my neutrality, or compromising my abilities to advance the mission from the inside and with the community's support. The desire to some way turn the passion I have for our mission into a sustainable lifestyle is still appealing, but paid editing is not something I have ever done or plan to pursue. 4552:

links, and lists of articles that have absolutely nothing to do with communicating with users on his talk page, burying the area where communication actually takes place. It's easy for experienced users to overlook this stuff, but new users shouldn't have to be baffled by all the non-communication information candidate has collected at the top of the page. I've given a few other "talk page opposes" before, but they've never engendered this level of vitriol; I respect people's right to disagree with me, but I find the anger puzzling, and my oppose enthusiastically stands.

370:

loss to us. That said... clear, pointed criticism, refutation, rebuttal, wit, and humor all have a place in lively intellectual discussion. Knowledge (XXG) is a place where one should be able to stand up for oneself and also to point out when/where someone is wrong, vigorously if necessary. The general exhortation to focus on the content rather than the contributor is another guide for me here, and editors who are merciless with their logic but who avoid personal attacks should be given far more slack than those who aim at the person rather than the idea.

75:) – It is my pleasure to nominate Ocaasi for adminship. He has been with us for the last two and a half years over which time he has made more than 20,000 edits. During this time he has displayed a good understanding of Knowledge (XXG) policy through his involvement with dispute resolution and reliable sourcing discussion. We met during Wikimania last year and I was impressed with his enthusiasm. I have no hesitation to nominate him for these extra tool. 103:

people who were committed to the mission of Knowledge (XXG) and Wikimedia. What started as an escapist hobby for me turned into a healthy addiction and a pursuit I'm really proud to be a part of. I am involved in many projects right now that would greatly benefit from access to the tools so that I can most effectively contribute. I'm very pleased to accept the nomination and am happy to answer any questions about my work with the site and community.

1547:

traditionally been a standard for measurement in the RfA process, but I think that they should be because these things have at least as much impact on the Knowledge (XXG) community as any admin function. On wiki, this person is a model user with lots of experience. I support his RfA because I know that having the tools would save him time and because I know that he will use them in accordance with community guidelines.

3152:, if the worst thing we can find to criticize a candidate for is some junk on the talk page, I think I can give a pretty resounding "yes". Never run into a bit of trouble with Ocassi, never known of anyone to, and from all indications here, just as levelheaded as ever. Also, the linked conduct on the Assange article was exemplary. I know (but won't name) more than one who could do with a careful study of that. 2559:- Having had disagreements with Ocaasi in the distant past, I've had the pleasure of watching him grow into a most clueful editor, and a real benefit to the project. I appreciate Axl's concerns about a lack of CSD work, but admins are never made "fully-formed" and have to learn their art. I have no doubt whatsoever that Ocaasi will learn with the tools, and won't break the 'pedia in the meantime. -- 4843:

reasoning behind it, but on the evidence given is not socking, attempting to vote-stack, canvassing, or being an IP; therefore his opinion will be given exactly the weight it requires by the closing bureaucrat. I agree with all that has been said above about the value of such nearly unsupported Opposes, but don't like the apparent devaluing of the contributor. Cheers,

2844: 302:

before they ever make it AfD by working in IRC-help and at Articles for Creation. Thus, I can't make a broad generalization about the familiarity of most participants with policy. My hunch, however, is that the most divisive issues at AfD have less to do with knowledge of policy and more to do with interpretation and application of them.

4283:. Wholeheartedly. As one of those who very much appreciated his HighBeam/Questia program, I am naturally positively biased. But I also found his answers above to very thoughtful, like for instance the one on incivility. So, from I have seen from him, he appears to have the kind of attitude that I want to see in an administrator. 202:. I like that I've been able to explore many different areas of Knowledge (XXG) and while contributing to them I get to learn about how each one operates and what best practices are. Also, I meet more editors in this way and develop the ability to connect and discuss ideas and projects that might not be obvious. 4657:. I do not believe that experience in AfC is adequate to judge CSDs. With only a few !votes in AfD, Ocaasi does not have the required experience to delete articles, let alone CSDs. While the tools may well be helpful for his OTRS work, Ocaasi's declared intention to work with CSD is enough for me to oppose. 4842:

To be just as clear, this oppose is perhaps not as well thought through or expressed as we might like, and is completely unworthy of being stricken. Cmach7 has expressed an opinion on the worthiness of Ocaasi for mop-holding; he may not have been able to give much beyond that opinion, or to give the

4709:

Kurtis, why is it that you haven't taken it upon yourself to browbeat the approximately 50 supporters who have offered little if anything as far as reasons? Why have you not told them that their support is "guaranteed to be ineffective"? In a landslide like this it's not going to make any difference,

4611:

Ocaasi, this is a good start and a notable improvement. I still think there's too much Myspace-type extraneous information and superfluous advertising at the top of the page -- talk page readers likely aren't coming to you for advice on where you'd like them to get involved in the project -- but that

1546:

I know this user personally because he does a large amount of off-wiki community organizing, outreach, and Knowledge (XXG) training. I collaborate with him on projects. He speaks well in public and people want to hear what he says about Wikimedia projects. Off-wiki Knowledge (XXG) activities have not

323:

at the same time. Newbies should be encouraged to learn first in this area, and when they feel comfortable to join in and to continue learning. I will say that participating is often the best motivation to learn and I have much deeper knowledge of the entire Deletion Process through instances where

301:

I think deletion discussions are vital to maintaining Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and standards--they are the essential maintenance for specifically deciding what is and isn't fit for the encyclopedia. My personal experience with these discussions is somewhat localized: I focus my efforts on articles

140:

work would certainly benefit from admin tools, as I have access to the emails which involve controversial instances of BLP issues, defamation, edit wars, and protected pages, many of which I cannot properly intervene in without the tools. Being an administrator would be invaluable here so that I can

4779:

per user:..... is not really elaboration, but it does tell people why you take a particular line. Since we value an RFA Oppose at almost three times the weight of a support it is not unreasonable that we allow supporters to omit the words "per nom" from their !vote. AFDs are different in that people

4697:

it is that you feel the candidate would not make a good administrator, preferrably backed with specific examples and links. Of course, you have every right not to elaborate any further and no one will take issue with you simply expressing an opinion, but voicing opposition without substantiating on

483:

On the other hand, please don't mistake my willingness to talk openly with paid editors and attempts to work constructively with them as some kind of duplicitous lobbying, or naive enabling. At the least, I believe in 'speaking with the enemy' and seeing beyond stereotypes to find common ground and

102:

Thanks James! I have been blown away by this community since I began reading its policy pages in 2007, and have remained so through my more recent efforts with outreach to organizations. Wikimania in 2012 was a major turning point for me in realizing that I was one of so many driven, enthusiastic

4566:

Hi Townlake. I think your point that talk pages should be accessible, especially for administrators, is reasonable and well-intentioned. I would as a matter of course work towards making my userpage even more streamlined and intuitive for new users. Should the opportunity arise, perhaps you can

4551:

I'm going to expand on my oppose since so many people are lashing out about it. From my perspective, new users need and deserve a simple and predictable mechanism for communicating with administrators. This candidate appears disinterested in providing that; he has put a litany of pointless quotes,

1112:

I don't see much speedy deletion activity, which concerns me in light of the answer to question 1. I would urge Ocaasi to be extremely cautious with CSD, particularly as AFC rejection is much broader then the CSD criteria. Even for the AFC rejection reasons that similar, they are often interpreted

369:

There is a risk that in tolerating extremes of incivility, even from editors whom we know well and love despite their faults, that we will foster an environment that many people--particularly new and less combative or thick-skinned editors--will simply not want to be a part of. I believe this is a

355:

I value civility, and the very idea of it--the policy (and Pillar no less)--is something that initially attracted me to this community. And yet civility is neither sufficient or strictly necessary. One can be blissfully civil and be quite a detraction from the community's goals. One can also be

4511:

Seriously? You're saying you do not trust a fellow editor and human being to be entrusted with 4 or 5 extra buttons because you don't like the styling of their talk page? This is one of the most ludicrous opposes I've seen in my time here and shame on you, Townlake, for this. Also just fyi, every

2681:

One of the better candidates I've seen here. Looked at the opposes, wondering who would oppose this guy, and was pretty disappointed to see my name in there, "sarcasm" be damned. I've supported many, many RfA candidates over the years--someone who has more free time than I do (and who, frankly,

223:

and alternative medicine, to debates about including an external link to a live news feed during the Egyptian Revolution, to discussions around conflict of interest, to sending out an overbroad, opt-out newsletter relating to dispute resolution. I've generally dealt with these issues civilly and

4207:

I have worked with Ocaasi both as a volunteer and in my staff capacity. The man is loaded with clue. He understands how to cooperate with others and has always been willing to assess his own actions, to adjust them as necessary to conform with consensus. To me, these are among the most important

1076:

Um, I don't think I need to tell people how to vote here (or that they'd necessarily take any notice if I did) - though that wasn't what KW intended. Given KW's comments on my talk page, he is suggesting that my working with Ocaasi on the often-contentious Julian Assange article (and on the talk

518:

I played sports in school with one of the founders of the company. We got in touch on Facebook after a decade and, unsolicited, I learned of and read about about the company and the fantastic press they had received. It's just an instinct of mine to check if a new subject has a Knowledge (XXG)

131:

One of my main focuses has been new editor engagement. Working as an IRC help channel volunteer, in Articles for Creation, and participating in editathons has presented many small opportunities where being an Admin would help me work with new editors. A primary use, for example, would be seeing

602:

In any meaningful sense, yes. When I started out (2007-2010) I edited from various ip addresses. There was a period in early 2010 when I edited both as an ip and as Ocaasi, but always on the same content and never misrepresenting myself as having more than a single view (socking)--I frequently

458:

on the one hand, but on the other I have also gone out of my way to speak with public relations professionals to better understand their perspective (and also to educate them about our policies and procedures). I think we need to continue to engage in this COI debate about editors and community

449:

turned down multiple requests to do. I have done a lot of work at AfC and OTRS helping editors understand our notability guidelines, all without compensation or any other financial benefit. I have sought out and developed partnerships with both for-profit and non-profit organizations, where I

677:

Thanks for chiming in Bbb23. I feel ok answering this anyway. Hi Cmach, first off, I hope you don't mind that I checked your history and I think it's great that you want to be an admin. Back to me: I have about 24,000 edits, about 1/3 of which are in article space. Early on I did a lot of

384:

reasonably. Ultimate questions of whether/when to ban an editor who is a great content contributor but egregiously uncivil are always going to be hard, and we have to take them on a case-by-case basis--seeking to minimize damage while we pursue both the goal of creating an encyclopedia and of

4750:

Perhaps the best way to look at it is that every RfA has a nomination statement (but no opposition statement). It is reasonable to consider that editors who support without further reason do so "per nomination" because they are actually supporting that statement. Since there is no equivalent

3983:- The resource project is very useful and shows dedication to advance Knowledge (XXG) not just individually, but from a community-wide level. Few individuals show such determination to go the extra mile for the betterment of the community, Ocaasi is exceptional and would be a good admin. 1987:; Did good work on the Assange talk page, lots of pro-active work getting source access, OTRS communication is pretty good (I looked through some tickets and in fact, a lot better than most) and he is a friendly chap. Trustworthy with the tools and can do useful things with them. -- 492:. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Just to be clear, I have no intention to use admin tools to push some policy that the community doesn't support or thinks is dangerous. I just like to think of creative solutions to hard problems and take the risk of people not liking them. 3809:

Obviously I'm way late to the party, but I'll go ahead and register my support as well. Ocaasi is a good editor and I think s/he will be an excellent admin. Congratulations on the high level of heartfelt support for your candidacy - it reflects very well on you as an editor.

4243:

Just back after a break but he is one editor whom I can implicitly trust.This dedication and commitment to the project is truly outstanding as shown in Highbeam project.His Knowledge (XXG) Library project is just truly exceptional.The project only gains with the user having

423:) shouldn't be regularly practiced with administrative actions. As an administrator, I would like to respect the tools and my peers and set an example of consensus-seeking and discussion whenever possible--I think that ultimately contributes to good working relationships. 132:

deleted content, which comes up frequently in dealing with new articles that were put into mainspace without meeting notability criteria or deleted for other reasons. I've also think I've gotten enough experience through AfC to make decent judgment calls with

379:

As for editors who contribute and are also consistently, egregiously uncivil... I believe in speaking with them, mentoring them, and if there's absolutely no other resort preventatively blocking them (especially as cool-down blocks). I would try to interpret

4377:

Candidate's talk page is a pointlessly disorganized mess, and the light amount of traffic there indicates the messiness might discourage communication. Candidate looks strong in other areas, but talk page is one of the very basics; it has to be easy to use.

4969:(improved and sourced) drafts into mainspace and many of our the irc-help and AfC users indeed work on marginally notable companies and organizations. If you are still suspicious I'd suggest you dig a little deeper. There's nothing there to find. 4891:

Such a vote by Cmach7 would be discounted anyway by the closing crat in a borderline tally, which this RfA isn't. I believe some other Wikipedias require their RfA voters to have some experience before qualifying to vote. Not a bad idea.

519:

article, and when I saw that it didn't, I thought it'd be neat to write an article on them. Since the sources were such high quality it just seemed like a fun thing to do. I submitted this article through Articles for Creation and specifically

153:

would be helpful. As I do more offline work in educational settings, as a campus ambassador, or a local coordinator for events, I'm confident there are many new uses for admin tools which I will discover, from account creation through to unblock

1038:

Strongly, a very valuable editor who done more to the project, with a few exceptions. His Knowledge (XXG) Library project is just truly exceptional and has helped so much content creators build an encyclopedia. Obvious needs for the tools.

1113:

differently in AFC space then the corresponding CSD criteria is. That said, in light of the other reasons for requesting admin outlined in question one, which are fine reasons, and my positive opinion of Ocaasi generally, I am supporting.

4964:

I understand your concerns and would be happy to address individual instances from the articles created list if you are interested. Keep in mind that as an active irc-help channel and AfC volunteer I was often responsible for moving

1439:

I was aware that Ocaasi had not already been granted the sysop bit, but that's only because I had to keep reminding myself of this fact. I've encountered his name plenty of times through my involvement with articles relating to the

603:

signed as Ocaasi even when not logged in. Others suggested it was time to pick one and just stick to it, which I did, editing from my main Ocaasi account for the past 2.5 years. I have also created several testing accounts listed

250:. It's obvious that you've done a fair amount of content building. Are there any cases where you ran into conflicts with other editors? If so, can you described how you resolved these situations and what you learned in the process? 4692:

I hate to pester you Cmach7, but I'm afraid your oppose rationale is not quite sufficient as to bear any significant weight on the outcome of this discussion. Bureaucrats, fellow participants, and adminship nominees want to know

3597:

Ocaasi is a great admin candidate - the extra buttons will be helpful with his already substantial work at OTRS and I have no concerns with regard to his wielding the mop and clearing the never-ending backlogs here on en-wiki.

413:

For me and my style, the circumstance would have to be especially, obviously against the block policy. I very much doubt that I would overturn a block without speaking directly with the blocking admin or taking the issue to

2629:

Since the issue of CSD experience was raised, I think a personal of overall good judgment such as Ocaasi can learn details of the rules easily enough, & can be relied upon following consensus in interpreting them. .

4978:

Are you more concerned about the editor's openness, the editor's willingness to help out at AfC (something it seems you have not done), or the editor's willingness to work with COI editors for the good of the project?

607:

because I often need to try out the new user experience and account creation process, test javascript, storyboard help documentation (take screenshots), mock-up model COI declarations, debug customized Wikilove

218:

Even with a general aversion to drama, when you spend enough time doing anything complex with such a diversity people, you run into some conflicts. I've had a few, ranging from disagreements about interpreting

1894:. The candidate is serious, dedicated, well-organized, helpful, and learns from past mistakes. He exhibits good communication skills and a mature temperment. I trust he will make a better-than-average sysop. 1849:- It's not very often that I have to do no research at all on a RfA nomination because of close familiarity and complete trust in the candidate. That is the case here. My highest possible recommendation. 418:

first. Circumstances in which overturning a block placed by another admin would constitute wheel warring would extend that even further. For my taste, I think even a strictly 1RR approach (analogous to

1650:

No evidence that I can see of problems. Talk page layouts are not a sufficient reason to tell someone that he's not qualified to block malcontents, delete copyvios, or determine discussion consensus.

4724:

One usually supports if they find nothing wrong with a candidate. If one opposes (the none null position in this case) one usually provides a reason so others can also weight this justification.

4710:

but it gets tiresome to see those who feel it's perfectly fine to simply support, but anyone wishing to oppose must provide an extensive rationale. Either demand it of everyone or no one.

311:

I wouldn't encourage anyone to participate in deletion discussions without reading and absorbing the relevant notability guidelines, deletion policy, and useful supplementary guides like

2475:--More likely to get us free full access to gbooks than to to blow up the main page. And if he can get that for us, I might just spearhead a drive to give him a unique user right. — 2018:– I've been honored to work with Ocaasi on various Knowledge (XXG) Library and upcoming projects and I've always been impressed by his articulateness, dedication, and initiative. — 3140:. Absolutely. Judging by the answers to questions in this very RfA (not to mention the great contributions to the project), this is exactly the type of editor we need as an admin. 2769:

in 2013 so far :-) And I expect it will remain one of my easiest supports by the end of the year - I've seen Ocaasi around the place a lot, and I really have no doubts at all. --

4628:

Talk page was not the best...but is an admin supposed to clean up talk pages??? If so mine could probaly do improving. LOL Even factoring the talk page Ocaasi is a net positive.

4576:

I made a few changes. It really had become a bit bloated even with recent efforts to trim it down. Let me know if you think my changes are sufficient or at least a good start.

1951:, good answers to the questions, solid editing history, and my interactions with this editor have all been positive - very level headed and thoughtful. Will make a fine admin. 1424:- I am highly impressed by the exceptional quality of the user's talk page. Anyone with something so amazingly breathtaking in their userspace should automatically have the bit. 1629:. This is an easy decision for me. I've interacted with the candidate before, and they are clearly experienced, clueful, considerate, friendly, and articulate. (Oh, and there's 4589:" is a bit harsh, Townlake. However, under the guidelines, IMO everything above the saying "TALK STARTS HERE" belongs rather on the user page, not on the user talk page; see 3028:. Seems a bit eager, which is not a bad thing, but otherwise I see no reason why he shouldn't be given the tools. Please accept my congrats as well on reaching the WP 100 :) 2823:. Introspective, interesting, flexible, willing to learn, eclectic, self-aware, smart, good writer. One oppose is frivolous. One oppose is silly. The third is unpersuasive.-- 360:

and that we should encourage it because it creates an environment that more people will want to participate in and in which disputes are resolved with more light than heat.

450:

thought other they could directly benefit our mission; that has also been without any compensation. I've done a lot of what I consider to be mediating work in the broader

346:

What is your opinion of civility as it relates to and/or conflicts with effective content creation? Which is more important? How do you think civility should be enforced?

4765:

How convienent. This would then certainly apply to AfD's, ban proposals, ect., which also have no "opposition statement". It's only necessary to elaborate if opposing?

1052:'s talk page. Seems familiar with policies and writes clearly. Writes on talk pages of serious writers covering current events. Andy the Grump can tell us how to vote. 212:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

612:), and other such tasks. I only use these accounts for testing and not editing, and I no longer edit as an ip unless it's just an accidental forgetting to sign-in. 3051:

soon after it was created, and I learned a lot from watching how s/he handled disputes. I am also a fan of Ocaasi's work on COI issues, and I particularly like the

5044: 1834:- Solid contributor with a great attitude and aptitude. Ocaasi's help with providing free access to research databases has had a positive impact to the project. - 814: 295:

What is your opinion of deletion discussions at wikipedia? Do you believe most participants are familiar with policy? Should newbies be encouraged to participate?

3360:

Ocaasi's effort to secure access to library databases for Wikipedians demonstrate that he can identify a pressing need and work with others to address that need.

934: 454:

debate (though some may believe me to be more on the tolerant side of paid/COI editing). I'd question a simple reduction of my views in this area. I wrote

929: 679: 455: 5023: 275:

works pretty well most of the time; and that most people here really are trying to do what they think is best in the way they are capable of expressing it.

5062: 2920:

for some time that Ocassi was on the take, but he says he is not and I couldn't find satisfactory evidence that he is lying about that or anything else.

118:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

3123:- I only wish the candidate had left the talk page alone so I could evaluate the Oppose. No worries, I checked the history...took a few more seconds. - 767: 3312: 1178: 4923: 3444: 4873:

Cmach7 had been blocked indefinitely on December 2, 2012, for repeatedly nominating himself for adminship. He was unblocked on December 14; see

4612:

might simply be a topic you and I will disagree on. Thanks for responding to my concerns with maturity and with an assumption of my good faith.

407:

As an admin, under which circumstances would you overturn a block placed by another admin? When is this an appropriate or inappropriate action?

5029: 4828:

To be clear, this oppose is ridiculous, and borders on being worthy of being stricken. I am only opposing the one-sidedness of the badgering.

872: 2319: 1880: 661:

This is an absurd question, with a history if anyone cares to examine Cmach7's background. If I were the nominee, I'd politely ignore it.--

1778:

Yes. Yes. Yes. One of the best qualified people out there who isn't already one, and better than some whom the community has elected.--

4031:

I recognize this username, and I've hardly edited in two years. Solid work behind the scenes. Admin material without a doubt. Good luck!

4990: 4950:

Not entirely satisfied with the answer to Q8, particularly with respect to the answer to Q9 and the "Articles created" list generally.

3516: 2524: 2073:

I'm convinced by the candidate's rationale for needing the tools and equally convinced of their competence and cluefulness to use them.

1685: 1285: 754: 3651:

22:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC) As a side note, I think the answer to Q6 would be slightly better off without the "cool-down" parenthesis.

33: 17: 4464:

Well, I guess this just further proves that there's always someone who pops an issue outta their ass on an otherwise perfect nominee.

3305: 797: 3861:

This editor's commitment and experience with HighBeam combined with the answers to questions are my reasons for giving my support. -

3673:

Literally one of those "he's not already" moments. No humanly-visible reason to Oppose, and clearly a net-positive to the project. (

791: 187: 3456:, candidate has extensive activity in various areas on Knowledge (XXG) and appears properly well-rounded to be considered an admin. 4590: 2238:: Easy to work with, good social skills, cool head, knows his policy, constructive, active, good judgment, takes criticism well. -- 2001:- I recognized the username from several aritlces he has contributed to; he seems trustworthy and will make good use of the tools. 924: 4249: 3844:. I won't pretend that I thought he was already an admin, because I knew he wasn't. He soon will be though, and it's about time. 555:

CSD intentionally sidesteps discussion because the violation is unambiguous, whereas AFD requires discussion to reach consensus.

315:. While I have found some new editors to be surprisingly quick on the uptake, no, I don't think we should send people a link to 5009:

Don't really have an opinion on this, but I think it is clear this RFA isn't going to fail so can't a crat close this already?--

5018: 3736: 3047:. Ocaasi has done excellent work on the Knowledge (XXG) Library, and does dispute resolution well. S/he showed me the ropes at 3035: 2547: 2431: 1262: 589: 4192: 312: 3682: 3388: 2794: 2061: 761: 4057: 2774: 2602: 2376: 806: 4737: 4479: 3758: 1313: 1170: 1025: 839: 747: 88: 72: 4787: 4528: 4245: 3203: 3128: 2497: 1496: 4919: 4140:- don't even have to check anything here. Ocaasi has always struck me as an excellent and responsible contributor. - 3440: 2959: 960: 356:

pretty miserable to work around and also make great contributions. I personally believe that civility is mostly just

5010: 2366:

Ocaasi's been a huge asset to the project so far; handing him a mop would only serve to make him more useful still.

174:

current events and historic individuals, preparing help documentation and guides for new users and COI editors like

4907: 4854:

Just as a disclaimer, I never intended to devalue Cmach7 in any way, shape, or form – I even went out of my way to

4751:

statement for the oppose section, it makes much less sense to oppose without giving any reason. Hope that helps, --

3891: 3585: 2463: 1062: 950: 4300:. Per Gnan, it has all been said. Seems like a level-headed and responsible editor that would make a good admin. 4017:

I've seen quite a bit of Ocaasi's editing over the years, and am confident that he or she will make a good admin.

4000:

I can't provide my own rationale here, the nomination and several of the above supports all voice it out for me.

3406: 3095: 2873: 2190: 865: 4911: 4741: 4358: 3988: 3967: 3911: 2770: 2315: 2137: 1875: 1242: 1029: 92: 4305: 3923:

Answers above demonstrate high level of clue, and don't remember any editing incidents that would worry me. --

898: 4985: 4005: 3924: 3512: 3073:. Ocaasi has plenty of clue, judgement and tact. I especially like the way he/she handled Q12. Best wishes. 2517: 2104: 1676: 1534: 1444:, and he's always come across as a voice of reason in discussions. He will make an excellent administrator. 1280: 1156: 4597:. The doubtful location of this content, alone, is however not a reason, for me, to oppose the nomination. 4594: 919: 4833: 4782: 4770: 4715: 4539: 4398: 4036: 3462: 3300: 3124: 2687: 2649:. Content contributor, experienced, appears to understand policy, no reason to think he will abuse tools. 2493: 2410: 2243: 2226: 2207: 1555: 1518: 1492: 1082: 992:

Eh... maybe not at this point. But still, he's a great guy and I'm glad to see that the community agrees.

700: 4915: 4317:. Looks like a good choice, see no reason to oppose after checking the comments below. Spot checks good. 3436: 2311: 914: 4980: 4955: 4492: 4208:

assets of an administrator. I trust him to bring this great good sense to this as all other roles. :) --

3887: 3740: 3581: 3058: 2978: 2599: 2480: 2459: 1919: 1899: 1800: 1722: 1592: 1407: 1389: 1350: 1329: 1275: 1055: 509: 255: 5043:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

3167: 1456: 835: 316: 195: 4408:

Yes, and I explained why it matters. Good for you for apparently reading half of my oppose rationale.

1200:

Seriously impressed by the clarity of Ocaasi's posts. I think Ocaasi will make a great administrator.

4109: 3402: 3092: 2888: 2868: 2745: 2683: 2668: 2619: 2394: 2186: 2039: 1638: 1613: 1362:- Enthusiastically, whole-heartedly, and with joy. He has proven himself to be a keeper of "clue". 858: 4527:

Thanks a lot for your thoughtful feeback, Townlake. I have strong feelings about this as well - see

4353: 4335: 4228: 4209: 4180: 4128: 4092: 3984: 3963: 3907: 3732: 3659: 3645: 3331: 2543: 2446: 2427: 2155: 2130: 2006: 1956: 1939: 1870: 1867: 1766: 1575: 1259: 1238: 1208: 585: 4995: 4973: 4959: 4927: 4901: 4885: 4864: 4849: 4837: 4823: 4796: 4774: 4760: 4745: 4719: 4704: 4687: 4670: 4637: 4621: 4606: 4580: 4571: 4561: 4546: 4522: 4500: 4486: 4452: 4424: 4403: 4387: 4365: 4342: 4326: 4309: 4301: 4292: 4275: 4253: 4235: 4212: 4199: 4183: 4168: 4149: 4132: 4115: 4094: 4078: 4064: 4040: 4026: 4009: 3992: 3971: 3957: 3929: 3915: 3895: 3880: 3853: 3836: 3816: 3804: 3788: 3771: 3744: 3717: 3703: 3686: 3665: 3629: 3611: 3589: 3572: 3555: 3537: 3520: 3492: 3467: 3448: 3427: 3410: 3393: 3369: 3352: 3336: 3317: 3285: 3268: 3251: 3234: 3209: 3182: 3158: 3144: 3132: 3115: 3101: 3082: 3065: 3039: 3020: 2986: 2938: 2929: 2908: 2892: 2875: 2860: 2832: 2815: 2796: 2778: 2760: 2749: 2732: 2716: 2691: 2673: 2653: 2641: 2621: 2607: 2585: 2568: 2551: 2531: 2501: 2484: 2467: 2450: 2436: 2413: 2398: 2381: 2358: 2341: 2324: 2301: 2275: 2247: 2230: 2213: 2194: 2177: 2160: 2144: 2124: 2112: 2088: 2065: 2043: 2026: 2010: 1993: 1979: 1962: 1943: 1926: 1903: 1886: 1858: 1841: 1826: 1804: 1787: 1770: 1751: 1726: 1709: 1692: 1660: 1642: 1621: 1596: 1579: 1562: 1538: 1522: 1500: 1484: 1465: 1450: 1434: 1414: 1396: 1371: 1354: 1337: 1320: 1290: 1266: 1246: 1229: 1215: 1195: 1185: 1150: 1140: 1126: 1107: 1086: 1069: 1043: 1033: 998: 983: 893: 826: 717: 704: 686: 670: 654: 616: 594: 559: 527: 496: 463: 439:

Have you ever edited Knowledge (XXG) on subjects where you have a financial conflict of interest?

389: 328: 259: 228: 150: 107: 96: 4633: 4617: 4557: 4459: 4420: 4383: 4322: 4288: 4163: 4001: 3699: 3674: 3625: 3533: 3503: 3383: 3365: 3153: 2966: 2792: 2581: 2510: 2293: 2098: 2056: 1975: 1669: 1668:- based on those above who support as well as the answer to my question, which seems reasonable. 1530: 1367: 1119: 338: 3052: 2958:

I would choose to support you. You're really positive at your description of why you want to an

609: 485: 381: 220: 179: 175: 146: 489: 4897: 4881: 4829: 4766: 4711: 4602: 4532: 4393: 4270: 4053: 4032: 3849: 3784: 3457: 3423: 3348: 3294: 3112: 3078: 2708: 2699:- I have worked w/ Editor Ocassi on an essay and an aricle or two. Wonderful collaborator. ``` 2407: 2370: 2337: 2239: 2222: 2202: 2173: 1854: 1783: 1656: 1548: 1510: 1136: 1078: 696: 682:

that if you just focus on improving Knowledge (XXG), becoming an admin will happen naturally.

283: 268: 415: 137: 4951: 4862: 4821: 4733: 4702: 4683: 4512:

talk page hasa neat "New section" button and it works perfectly well on Ocaasi's talk page.

4473: 4446: 4145: 4022: 3801: 3766: 3568: 3484: 3283: 3264: 3247: 2971: 2925: 2858: 2682:

cares more) is welcome to add 'em up. Anyways, this will be a landslide, congratulations.

2595: 2476: 2354: 2081: 2021: 1913: 1895: 1820: 1796: 1718: 1705: 1588: 1463: 1448: 1402: 1384: 1346: 1307: 1225: 1146: 1021: 996: 981: 741: 650: 629: 542: 459:

members, because it is not going away, and Knowledge (XXG) is only becoming more important.

399: 251: 238: 84: 66: 4061: 3048: 2999: 2917: 2185:: Very impressed with his handling of questions directed at him and to him on this page. ( 974: 451: 420: 320: 272: 199: 191: 142: 133: 4756: 4104: 3609: 3226: 3178: 2884: 2828: 2741: 2662: 2616: 2564: 2390: 2035: 1634: 1605: 666: 638: 348:

This question is intentionally broad; please just shed some light on how you view civility

247: 183: 3563:

Slight red flag at wanting to work in CSD, but other than that, I think I can support.--

713:

he meant 'solid' or 'substantial' edits to articles rather than the quality assessment.

4223: 4177: 4124: 4087: 4073: 3826: 3727: 3654: 3640: 3546: 3326: 3141: 3029: 3013: 2813: 2536: 2442: 2423: 2150: 2118: 2002: 1952: 1935: 1761: 1743: 1571: 1426: 1256: 1202: 1191: 1103: 1049: 581: 569: 5056: 4845: 4678:. This user is a good contributor, but I don't think he/she would make a good admin. 4668: 4629: 4613: 4553: 4429:

Those are the kind of opposes that make me believe we are not improving anytime soon.

4416: 4379: 4318: 4284: 4159: 3947: 3812: 3713: 3695: 3678: 3620: 3545:

A productive user flying through RfA without any problems. Clearly something's up :)

3529: 3378: 3361: 2787: 2757: 2637: 2577: 2286: 2265: 2052: 1971: 1838: 1480: 1363: 1114: 822: 642: 246:

I was looking over your edit history and read some articles you've worked on such as

3886:

Not only "highbeam experience" but "singlehandedly set up the whole highbeam deal".

2786:. Ocaasi is helpful, competent, and knows policy. A definite plus to the mop corps. 4893: 4877: 4598: 4515: 4262: 4220:

I had a look through user's contribution they were helpful and useful so i support

4049: 3845: 3780: 3419: 3344: 3109: 3074: 2726: 2700: 2367: 2333: 2169: 1989: 1850: 1779: 1652: 1475:- looks pretty good to me, and I couldn't care less how his talk page is laid out. 1132: 145:

as an adjunct to the anti-vandal patrol work I have done in the past, such as with

141:

be effective and self-sufficient in those efforts. I might do some block work at

3377:- A fine addition to the admin group. Overwhelming support from trusted editors. 2492:- This editor understands policy and has made substantial content contributions. 4970: 4874: 4859: 4818: 4810: 4725: 4699: 4679: 4577: 4568: 4467: 4439: 4141: 4018: 3863: 3798: 3753: 3564: 3476: 3276: 3260: 3243: 2935: 2921: 2901: 2848: 2350: 2074: 1813: 1701: 1460: 1445: 1441: 1301: 1221: 1040: 1013: 993: 978: 737: 714: 683: 646: 626: 613: 556: 537: 524: 493: 460: 431: 386: 325: 225: 171: 104: 76: 62: 53:

Final (167/4/1). Closed as successful by WJBscribe @ 01:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

2765:

You already have Risker's easiest support in 2012, and you now have my easiest

2593:- per everyone above. I have nothing new to add, but wanted to go on record. -- 4814: 4752: 4491:

I don't even think the talk page is disorganised. It's a subjective argument.

3599: 3219: 3194: 3173: 2824: 2650: 2560: 1508:

Hard-working, clueful user with positive and innovative ideas. No red flags.

955: 662: 5037:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

1379:- am still keen to read answers to editor questions (especially the one from 3008: 2805: 1736: 1099: 1812:

The answer to my question is a bit short, but it hits the spot. Regards. —

4858:

apologizing for this whole kerfuffle and encouraging him to stick around.

1700:- The user looks to be more than qualified to be an admin. Best of luck, 1220:

Easiest support vote I've made in 2012. Ocaasi brings a lot to the table.

1098:

per nom. Good clear writer, good edits, no reason to distrust this one. --

973:

Is it too early to say that this one has a genuine shot at making it onto

4658: 3938: 2632: 2256: 1835: 1476: 818: 194:, and getting editors free access to proprietary research databases like 2615:- I keep on running into this editor, and I keep on being impressed. -- 604: 2962:. 𝕁𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕟 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕟 𝕂𝕪𝕤𝕖𝕣 23:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2093:

I wasn't expecting to see this when I flicked onto the RfA page today.

5047:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

1401:

Well, my faith was clearly justified - a good answer in my opinion.

2996:. I've seen them around, and "RfA" seems to be a reasonable step. 838:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 4531:. However, I feel that this person's userpage meets my standards. 1459:. He's clearly a dedicated editor who's done a lot for this site. 850: 3637:: Looks good to me. I liked the answers to questions. Good luck! 3170:, other worthwhile contributions and positive user interactions. 4908:

User talk:Cmach7/Archive 2#Short new articles without references

3725:

I can't see any reason not to hand you the mop - wield it well.

2200:

Ocaasi does good work on wiki and off. He will be a fine admin.

1604:

Good answers to questions; talk-page objection no concern here.

1383:) but the answers to stock questions are enough to convince me. 2389:

He's a sensible chap who won't break any of the family china. —

854: 164:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

4809:

for anyone who is interested. Basically, it reiterates what

4392:

You're opposing...because you think his talk page is messy?

549:

Which is, for you, the main difference between CSD and AFD?

4350:

Everything looks good and okay. All the very best Ocaasi. ~

4436:: With these kind of rationales, who needs Keepscases? ;) 4048:

Valuable contributions in the past and more anticipated.

3401:

answers and activities are clueful about what is needed.

385:

creating a community in which people will want to do so.

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2934:(please see my full reply beneath your questions above) 125:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

4855: 4806: 3090:

will be one of the better admins from day one I think.

1630: 785: 779: 773: 520: 267:

I keep a small journal of substantial editing disputes

136:, although I'm in no rush to start closing threads. My 4567:

drop by and recommend/check out any changes. Cheers,

3242:

no reason to think this user would abuse the tools. --

3824:

I see nothing that worries me about this nomination.

2283:- Looks like a very good editor. No concerns for me. 2883:

A good candidate who can be trusted with the tools.

4415:; people will either agree with it or they won't.) 4072:No problems here. Great user who deserves the mop. 943: 907: 886: 1587:No concerns--he seems like a pretty sensible guy. 4585:After checking out Ocaasi's talk page, I think " 3293:Better late than never, seems fully qualified. 170:I'm most proud of the content work I've done on 456:Conflict of interest editing on Knowledge (XXG) 3864: 2406:- looks to be a solid candidate, no concerns. 2034:It seems like the tools will be in good hands. 1866:. Hmm. Well. Thought he was an admin already. 3580:. I'm far to inactive. I nearly missed this. 2051:– has the interests of the project at heart. 1455:Now I recognize him for his involvement with 866: 382:Knowledge (XXG):CIVIL#Blocking_for_incivility 8: 4336: 3277: 2865:I haven't found any reasons not to support. 1934:, do not expect any problems in this case.-- 691:Just a comment in passing, but isn't it the 324:I've argued for keeping an article I wrote. 3053:plain and simple conflict of interest guide 2788: 804:Edit summary usage for Ocaasi can be found 637:Do you have 5,000 good article edits (Like 579:Is Ocaasi the only account you edit from?-- 4744:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 1734:- Looks like a great candidate to me. -- 1032:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 873: 859: 851: 95:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 3797:per very diplomatic answer to #12--v/r - 2900:. Sure! Looks trustworthy and competent. 523:my personal connection for the reviewer. 834:Please keep discussion constructive and 695:articles that need editing most anyway? 4591:WP:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages 4465: 1299: 190:, developing on a teaching tool called 4805:I have explained by reasoning over at 4410:(I won't be commenting further on this 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 4480: 1314: 7: 4856:leave him a message on his talk page 4698:it is guaranteed to be ineffective. 2841: 488:and a much more detailed background 3752:Good user, no reason to oppose. ~~ 4086:. Got in there just in time ;) -- 1759:. Well qualified, no concerns. -- 1274:, seems to meet my requirements -- 1254:Seems to be a trustworthy editor. 313:Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid 24: 5063:Successful requests for adminship 4468: 4271: 1795:. Very well qualified candidate. 1302: 1190:A very strong candidate. - Dank ( 4529:User:Bluerasberry/userpagepolicy 2842: 2149:Support - Candidate looks fine. 149:. Along those lines, access to 4123:Of course! Excellent editor. -- 3906:Seen good work and lots of it. 3626: 3621: 2976: 1970:- everything looks good to me. 1131:Per nominator, great editor. -- 538: 4906:This is more complicated, see 2201: 1: 4688:16:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 4671:18:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4622:19:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4607:15:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4587:pointlessly disorganized mess 4581:15:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4572:15:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4562:14:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4547:13:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4523:11:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4501:07:02, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4487:05:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4453:05:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4425:05:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4404:04:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 4388:04:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 3619:No issues. Thanks all :-) -- 3055:. A very strong candidate. — 2608:22:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2586:20:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2569:19:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2552:19:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2532:18:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2502:17:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2485:16:36, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2468:16:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2451:15:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2437:14:18, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2414:14:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2399:14:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2382:13:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2359:06:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2342:06:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2325:06:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2309:– I see no reason to oppose. 2302:05:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2276:04:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2248:04:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2231:04:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2214:04:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2195:03:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2178:02:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2161:02:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2145:01:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2125:01:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2113:01:04, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 2089:23:46, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 2066:23:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 2044:23:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 2027:22:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 2011:22:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1994:22:03, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1980:22:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1963:21:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1944:20:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1927:20:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1904:20:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1887:19:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1859:19:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1842:18:40, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1827:18:32, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1805:18:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1788:17:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1771:17:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1752:17:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1727:17:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1710:17:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1693:17:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1661:17:03, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1643:16:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1622:16:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1597:16:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1580:13:54, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1563:13:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1539:12:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1523:12:40, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1501:12:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1485:12:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1466:23:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1451:11:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1435:11:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1415:02:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 1397:11:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1372:07:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1355:07:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1338:07:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1321:05:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1291:04:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1267:03:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1255: 1247:03:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1230:03:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1216:02:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1196:02:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1186:02:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1151:02:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1141:02:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1127:02:10, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1108:02:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1087:21:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1070:02:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1044:01:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 1034:01:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 827:01:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 617:02:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 595:21:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 560:15:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 528:15:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 464:15:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 390:15:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 329:15:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 260:01:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC) 229:04:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 192:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 108:00:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 97:23:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 4474: 3878: 3528:Ocaasi is a net positive. - 3500:strongly and with pleasure. 2095:Full hearted strong support! 1345:as I find no reason not to. 1308: 5030:21:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4996:04:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4974:20:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4960:20:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4928:08:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4902:22:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4886:11:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4865:10:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4850:08:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4838:01:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4824:02:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4797:20:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4775:23:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 4761:22:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 4746:21:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 4720:21:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 4705:05:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 4638:17:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4366:00:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4343:23:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4327:23:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4310:22:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4293:20:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4276:16:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4254:16:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4236:15:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4213:13:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4200:12:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4184:12:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4169:11:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4150:10:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4133:08:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4116:07:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4095:07:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4079:06:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4065:06:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4041:04:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4027:03:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4010:01:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 3993:01:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 3972:02:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 3958:23:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3930:23:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3916:22:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3896:21:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3881:21:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3854:21:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3837:20:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3817:19:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3805:18:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3789:14:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3779:- See no reason to oppose. 3772:13:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3745:09:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3718:08:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3704:03:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3687:23:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3666:01:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 3630:19:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3612:18:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3590:18:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3573:18:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3556:17:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3538:17:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3521:12:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3493:10:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3468:08:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3449:07:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3428:07:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3411:23:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3394:22:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3370:20:49, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3353:19:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3337:19:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3318:19:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3286:17:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3269:17:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3252:17:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3235:17:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3210:14:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3183:09:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3159:09:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3145:08:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3133:03:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3116:02:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3102:02:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3083:02:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3066:01:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3040:00:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3021:23:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2987:16:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 2939:20:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2930:20:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2909:19:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2893:19:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2876:18:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2861:18:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2833:18:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2816:17:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2797:16:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2779:13:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2761:11:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2750:09:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2733:08:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2717:07:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2692:07:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2674:06:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2654:01:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2642:01:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 2622:01:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 999:04:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 984:05:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 718:23:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 705:22:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 687:19:40, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 671:01:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 655:01:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 647:My name is Cory Machkovich. 497:21:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 182:, assisting new editors in 114:Questions for the candidate 5079: 3711:No reason not to. Cheers, 2724:Good candidate, has clue. 2221:Reasonable, stand-up guy. 1296:Obvious support is obvious 430:Additional questions from 4263: 3962:Indented duplicate vote. 3865: 3694:. Very committed editor. 3418:, very strong candidate. 625:Additional question from 568:Additional question from 536:Additional question from 398:Additional question from 337:Additional question from 282:Additional question from 237:Additional question from 200:a Knowledge (XXG) Library 5040:Please do not modify it. 4912:User talk:24.209.139.161 4413:expanded thoughts below 2168:-- reasons given above. 38:Please do not modify it 4246:Pharaoh of the Wizards 2576:. No reason why not.-- 1490:Strong Obvious Support 1457:HighBeam subscriptions 2998:(and congrats on the 813:Edit stats posted on 510:Sociometric Solutions 188:Articles for Creation 34:request for adminship 5013:The Devil's Advocate 3926:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 3475:no problems here. -- 956:Global contributions 4191:Good luck, Ocaasi. 2771:Boing! said Zebedee 1717:; great candidate. 920:Non-automated edits 840:their contributions 508:Why did you submit 4176:its all been said 3259:No concerns here! 2967:User:JordanKyser22 2956:Extremely Support. 2432:List of good deeds 2025: 899:Edit summary usage 842:before commenting. 735:Links for Ocaasi: 590:List of good deeds 39: 4888: 4463: 4414: 3898: 3770: 3696:Vinicius Siqueira 3663: 3649: 3489: 3316: 3308: 3303: 3157: 3125:UnbelievableError 3105: 3019: 3003: 2965:Above !vote from 2954: 2840:Absolutely 110%! 2715: 2494:Spencer.mccormick 2159: 2111: 2064: 2019: 1961: 1493:Thine Antique Pen 1184: 1149: 1124: 1068: 969: 968: 349: 37: 5070: 5042: 5026: 5021: 5015: 4993: 4988: 4983: 4869: 4794: 4790: 4785: 4730: 4667: 4663: 4544: 4543: 4537: 4518: 4498: 4495: 4485: 4482: 4476: 4470: 4457: 4450: 4444: 4437: 4412: 4401: 4396: 4361: 4356: 4340: 4273: 4267: 4234: 4197: 4166: 4112: 4107: 4090: 4076: 3952: 3943: 3927: 3888:Martijn Hoekstra 3885: 3879: 3874: 3871: 3869: 3868: 3833: 3831: 3769: 3764: 3761: 3756: 3664: 3657: 3650: 3643: 3627: 3623: 3607: 3582:Martijn Hoekstra 3553: 3519: 3510: 3506: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3465: 3460: 3391: 3386: 3381: 3334: 3329: 3310: 3306: 3301: 3281: 3261:Kevin Rutherford 3233: 3231: 3224: 3206: 3197: 3176: 3156: 3100: 3061: 3060:Mr. Stradivarius 3032: 3018: 3016: 3005: 2997: 2984: 2981: 2974: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2945: 2906: 2872: 2855: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2808: 2790: 2740:- long overdue. 2729: 2707: 2671: 2665: 2606: 2605: 2540: 2529: 2522: 2515: 2460:Morning Sunshine 2435: 2434: 2379: 2373: 2300: 2291: 2270: 2261: 2212: 2210: 2205: 2153: 2140: 2109: 2107: 2101: 2086: 2079: 2059: 2055: 2024: 1959: 1955: 1925: 1922: 1916: 1883: 1878: 1873: 1824: 1818: 1748: 1747: 1741: 1740: 1690: 1683: 1674: 1617: 1609: 1560: 1559: 1553: 1521: 1516: 1513: 1433: 1431: 1430: 1411: 1393: 1335: 1332: 1328:good candidate. 1319: 1316: 1310: 1304: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1265: 1213: 1205: 1181: 1175: 1168: 1165: 1160: 1145: 1120: 1117: 1067: 1065: 1060: 1053: 1018: 915:Articles created 875: 868: 861: 852: 809: 801: 760: 730:General comments 593: 592: 540: 347: 151:Reversion Delete 81: 5078: 5077: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5045:this nomination 5038: 5028: 5024: 5019: 5011: 5006: 4991: 4986: 4981: 4894:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4792: 4788: 4783: 4726: 4665: 4659: 4541: 4540: 4533: 4516: 4496: 4493: 4447: 4440: 4432: 4399: 4394: 4374: 4359: 4354: 4232: 4221: 4193: 4164: 4110: 4105: 4088: 4074: 3955: 3948: 3939: 3925: 3872: 3866: 3846:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3829: 3827: 3765: 3759: 3754: 3652: 3638: 3605: 3547: 3508: 3502: 3501: 3485: 3477: 3463: 3458: 3403:Alanscottwalker 3389: 3384: 3379: 3332: 3327: 3227: 3220: 3218: 3208: 3204: 3195: 3171: 3059: 3038: 3030: 3014: 3006: 2979: 2972: 2949: 2947: 2946: 2902: 2866: 2853: 2850: 2843: 2812: 2806: 2727: 2669: 2663: 2598: 2594: 2538: 2525: 2518: 2511: 2426: 2422: 2377: 2371: 2298: 2287: 2284: 2273: 2266: 2257: 2208: 2203: 2138: 2105: 2099: 2082: 2075: 2057: 2020: 1957: 1924: 1920: 1914: 1912: 1881: 1876: 1871: 1821: 1814: 1745: 1744: 1738: 1737: 1686: 1677: 1670: 1615: 1607: 1557: 1556: 1549: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1428: 1427: 1425: 1409: 1391: 1333: 1330: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1235:Obvious support 1209: 1203: 1179: 1171: 1161: 1158: 1123: 1115: 1063: 1056: 1054: 1014: 1009: 970: 965: 939: 903: 882: 881:RfA/RfB toolbox 879: 849: 805: 753: 736: 732: 584: 580: 248:Gabriel Cousens 116: 77: 60: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5076: 5074: 5066: 5065: 5055: 5054: 5050: 5049: 5033: 5032: 5017: 5005: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4976: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4748: 4673: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4609: 4574: 4535:Blue Rasberry 4525: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4455: 4430: 4373: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4355:TheGeneralUser 4345: 4329: 4312: 4295: 4278: 4256: 4241:Strong Support 4238: 4226: 4218:Strong Support 4215: 4210:Moonriddengirl 4202: 4186: 4171: 4152: 4135: 4118: 4097: 4081: 4067: 4043: 4029: 4012: 3995: 3985:ChrisGualtieri 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3964:Reaper Eternal 3945: 3918: 3908:Anna Frodesiak 3901: 3900: 3899: 3856: 3839: 3819: 3807: 3791: 3774: 3747: 3720: 3706: 3689: 3668: 3632: 3614: 3592: 3575: 3558: 3540: 3523: 3495: 3470: 3451: 3430: 3413: 3396: 3372: 3355: 3339: 3320: 3288: 3271: 3254: 3237: 3212: 3202: 3185: 3161: 3147: 3135: 3118: 3107: 3106: 3085: 3068: 3042: 3034: 3023: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2911: 2895: 2878: 2863: 2835: 2818: 2810: 2799: 2781: 2763: 2752: 2735: 2719: 2712: 2704: 2694: 2676: 2656: 2644: 2624: 2610: 2588: 2571: 2554: 2534: 2509:- No brainer. 2504: 2487: 2470: 2453: 2439: 2416: 2401: 2384: 2361: 2349:- Looks good. 2344: 2327: 2312:The Anonymouse 2304: 2294: 2278: 2263: 2250: 2236:Strong support 2233: 2216: 2198: 2180: 2166:Strong Support 2163: 2147: 2127: 2115: 2091: 2068: 2046: 2029: 2013: 1996: 1982: 1965: 1946: 1929: 1918: 1906: 1889: 1861: 1844: 1829: 1807: 1790: 1773: 1754: 1729: 1712: 1695: 1663: 1645: 1624: 1599: 1582: 1565: 1551:Blue Rasberry 1541: 1525: 1503: 1487: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1437: 1422:Strong Support 1419: 1418: 1417: 1374: 1357: 1340: 1323: 1293: 1269: 1249: 1239:Reaper Eternal 1232: 1218: 1198: 1188: 1153: 1143: 1129: 1121: 1110: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1050:Julian Assange 1046: 1036: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 987: 986: 967: 966: 964: 963: 958: 953: 947: 945: 941: 940: 938: 937: 932: 927: 922: 917: 911: 909: 905: 904: 902: 901: 896: 890: 888: 884: 883: 880: 878: 877: 870: 863: 855: 848: 845: 831: 830: 829: 811: 802: 731: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 675: 674: 673: 632: 622: 621: 620: 619: 573: 572: 565: 564: 563: 562: 544: 533: 532: 531: 530: 502: 501: 500: 499: 478: 477: 476: 475: 469: 468: 467: 466: 434: 427: 426: 425: 424: 402: 395: 394: 393: 392: 374: 373: 372: 371: 364: 363: 362: 361: 341: 334: 333: 332: 331: 306: 305: 304: 303: 286: 279: 278: 277: 276: 241: 234: 233: 232: 231: 206: 205: 204: 203: 158: 157: 156: 155: 115: 112: 111: 110: 59: 56: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5075: 5064: 5061: 5060: 5058: 5048: 5046: 5041: 5035: 5034: 5031: 5027: 5022: 5016: 5014: 5008: 5007: 5003: 4997: 4994: 4989: 4984: 4977: 4975: 4972: 4968: 4967:other editors 4963: 4962: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4890: 4889: 4887: 4883: 4879: 4875: 4872: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4863: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4848: 4847: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4822: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4804: 4798: 4795: 4791: 4786: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4758: 4754: 4749: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4729: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4703: 4701: 4696: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4677: 4674: 4672: 4669: 4664: 4662: 4656: 4653: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4610: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4595:WP:User pages 4592: 4588: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4579: 4575: 4573: 4570: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4545: 4538: 4536: 4530: 4526: 4524: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4510: 4502: 4499: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4483: 4477: 4471: 4461: 4460:edit conflict 4456: 4454: 4451: 4449: 4445: 4443: 4435: 4431: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4411: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4402: 4397: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4376: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4357: 4349: 4346: 4344: 4341: 4339: 4333: 4330: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4313: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4296: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4279: 4277: 4274: 4268: 4266: 4260: 4257: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4242: 4239: 4237: 4233: 4230: 4225: 4219: 4216: 4214: 4211: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4198: 4196: 4195:Érico Wouters 4190: 4187: 4185: 4182: 4179: 4175: 4172: 4170: 4167: 4162: 4161: 4156: 4153: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4136: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4119: 4117: 4114: 4113: 4108: 4101: 4098: 4096: 4093: 4091: 4085: 4082: 4080: 4077: 4071: 4068: 4066: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4044: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4013: 4011: 4007: 4003: 4002:John F. Lewis 3999: 3996: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3979: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3953: 3951: 3944: 3942: 3936: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3928: 3922: 3919: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3902: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3876: 3875: 3860: 3857: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3840: 3838: 3835: 3834: 3823: 3820: 3818: 3815: 3814: 3808: 3806: 3803: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3775: 3773: 3768: 3762: 3757: 3751: 3748: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3729: 3724: 3721: 3719: 3716: 3715: 3710: 3707: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3690: 3688: 3684: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3669: 3667: 3661: 3656: 3647: 3642: 3636: 3633: 3631: 3628: 3624: 3618: 3615: 3613: 3610: 3608: 3604: 3603: 3596: 3593: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3576: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3554: 3552: 3551: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3524: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3509:Pigsonthewing 3505: 3499: 3496: 3494: 3491: 3490: 3488: 3486:it's my world 3480: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3461: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3414: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3397: 3395: 3392: 3387: 3382: 3376: 3373: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3330: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3309: 3304: 3298: 3297: 3292: 3289: 3287: 3284: 3282: 3280: 3275: 3272: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3255: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3238: 3236: 3232: 3230: 3225: 3223: 3217:no worries. 3216: 3213: 3211: 3207: 3205:Contributions 3200: 3199: 3198: 3190:no concerns. 3189: 3186: 3184: 3180: 3175: 3169: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3155: 3154:Seraphimblade 3151: 3148: 3146: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3119: 3117: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3097: 3094: 3089: 3086: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3069: 3067: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3043: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3027: 3024: 3022: 3017: 3011: 3010: 3001: 2995: 2992: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2975: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2961: 2960:Administrator 2957: 2944: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2912: 2910: 2907: 2905: 2899: 2896: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2870: 2864: 2862: 2859: 2857: 2856: 2839: 2836: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2819: 2817: 2814: 2809: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2791: 2785: 2782: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2736: 2734: 2731: 2730: 2723: 2720: 2718: 2714: 2713: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2695: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2680: 2677: 2675: 2672: 2666: 2661:no worries -- 2660: 2657: 2655: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2634: 2628: 2625: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2589: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2528: 2523: 2521: 2516: 2514: 2508: 2505: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2438: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2409: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2385: 2383: 2380: 2374: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2345: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2332:Net benefit. 2331: 2328: 2326: 2323: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2308: 2305: 2303: 2299: 2297: 2292: 2290: 2282: 2279: 2277: 2271: 2269: 2262: 2260: 2254: 2251: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2234: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2217: 2215: 2211: 2206: 2199: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2181: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2164: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2148: 2146: 2143: 2141: 2134: 2133: 2129:No concerns. 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2117:No qualms. — 2116: 2114: 2108: 2103: 2102: 2096: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2080: 2078: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2060: 2054: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2023: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1983: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1960: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1930: 1928: 1923: 1917: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1869: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1819: 1817: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1742: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1684: 1682: 1681: 1675: 1673: 1667: 1664: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1611: 1610: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1554: 1552: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531:Torreslfchero 1529: 1526: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1443: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1423: 1420: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1388: 1387: 1382: 1381:Go Phightins! 1378: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1317: 1311: 1305: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1264: 1261: 1258: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1207: 1206: 1199: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1187: 1182: 1176: 1174: 1167: 1166: 1164: 1155:Good editor. 1154: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1118: 1111: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1059: 1051: 1048:Good work on 1047: 1045: 1042: 1037: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1017: 1012:As nominator 1011: 1010: 1006: 1000: 997: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 985: 982: 980: 976: 972: 971: 962: 959: 957: 954: 952: 949: 948: 946: 942: 936: 933: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 913: 912: 910: 906: 900: 897: 895: 892: 891: 889: 885: 876: 871: 869: 864: 862: 857: 856: 853: 846: 844: 843: 841: 837: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815:the talk page 812: 808: 803: 799: 796: 793: 790: 787: 784: 781: 778: 775: 772: 769: 766: 763: 759: 756: 752: 749: 746: 743: 739: 734: 733: 729: 719: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 689: 688: 685: 681: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 633: 631: 628: 624: 623: 618: 615: 611: 606: 601: 598: 597: 596: 591: 587: 583: 578: 575: 574: 571: 567: 566: 561: 558: 554: 551: 550: 548: 545: 543: 541: 535: 534: 529: 526: 522: 517: 514: 513: 512:through AfC? 511: 507: 504: 503: 498: 495: 491: 487: 482: 481: 480: 479: 473: 472: 471: 470: 465: 462: 457: 453: 448: 444: 441: 440: 438: 435: 433: 429: 428: 422: 417: 412: 409: 408: 406: 403: 401: 397: 396: 391: 388: 383: 378: 377: 376: 375: 368: 367: 366: 365: 359: 354: 351: 350: 345: 342: 340: 339:Go Phightins! 336: 335: 330: 327: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 308: 307: 300: 297: 296: 294: 290: 287: 285: 281: 280: 274: 270: 266: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 240: 236: 235: 230: 227: 222: 217: 214: 213: 211: 208: 207: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 184:irc help chat 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 165: 163: 160: 159: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 127: 126: 124: 121: 120: 119: 113: 109: 106: 101: 100: 99: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 80: 74: 71: 68: 64: 57: 55: 54: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 5039: 5036: 5012: 4966: 4870: 4844: 4830:Joefromrandb 4807:my talk page 4781: 4767:Joefromrandb 4727: 4712:Joefromrandb 4694: 4675: 4660: 4654: 4586: 4534: 4514: 4513: 4448: 4441: 4433: 4409: 4352: 4351: 4347: 4337: 4331: 4314: 4297: 4280: 4264: 4258: 4240: 4222: 4217: 4204: 4194: 4188: 4173: 4158: 4154: 4137: 4120: 4103: 4099: 4083: 4069: 4045: 4033:Juliancolton 4014: 3997: 3980: 3949: 3940: 3934: 3920: 3903: 3862: 3858: 3841: 3825: 3821: 3811: 3794: 3776: 3749: 3726: 3722: 3712: 3708: 3691: 3677: 3670: 3634: 3616: 3601: 3600: 3594: 3577: 3560: 3549: 3548: 3542: 3525: 3517:Andy's edits 3513:Talk to Andy 3504:Andy Mabbett 3497: 3482: 3481: 3472: 3453: 3432: 3415: 3398: 3374: 3357: 3341: 3322: 3311: 3296:Dennis Brown 3295: 3290: 3278: 3273: 3256: 3239: 3228: 3221: 3214: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3163: 3149: 3137: 3120: 3091: 3087: 3070: 3057: 3056: 3044: 3025: 3007: 2993: 2970: 2955: 2913: 2903: 2897: 2880: 2867: 2849: 2837: 2820: 2804:No brainer.— 2801: 2783: 2766: 2754: 2737: 2725: 2721: 2709: 2703:Buster Seven 2701: 2696: 2678: 2658: 2646: 2631: 2626: 2612: 2590: 2573: 2556: 2548: 2544: 2537: 2526: 2519: 2512: 2506: 2489: 2472: 2455: 2441:Absolutely. 2421:Of course.-- 2418: 2403: 2386: 2363: 2346: 2329: 2310: 2306: 2295: 2288: 2280: 2267: 2258: 2252: 2240:Anthonyhcole 2235: 2218: 2182: 2165: 2135: 2131: 2119: 2097: 2094: 2083: 2076: 2070: 2048: 2031: 2015: 1998: 1988: 1984: 1967: 1948: 1931: 1908: 1891: 1863: 1846: 1831: 1822: 1815: 1809: 1792: 1775: 1760: 1756: 1735: 1731: 1714: 1697: 1687: 1679: 1678: 1671: 1665: 1647: 1626: 1614: 1606: 1601: 1584: 1567: 1550: 1543: 1527: 1505: 1489: 1472: 1421: 1408: 1403: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1376: 1359: 1342: 1325: 1295: 1271: 1251: 1234: 1210: 1201: 1192:push to talk 1172: 1162: 1157: 1095: 1079:AndyTheGrump 1057: 1015: 833: 832: 794: 788: 782: 776: 770: 764: 757: 750: 744: 710: 697:AndyTheGrump 692: 645:would say)? 634: 599: 576: 552: 546: 515: 505: 446: 442: 436: 410: 404: 357: 352: 343: 298: 292: 288: 284:Ottawahitech 264: 243: 215: 209: 167: 161: 128: 122: 117: 78: 69: 61: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 4952:Plutonium27 4916:Vejvančický 4817:have said. 4334:per above. 4157:per above. 4102:per above. 3437:Vejvančický 3142:— sparklism 2973:theopolisme 2596:Sue Rangell 2477:Crisco 1492 1915:WikiPuppies 1911:Obviously. 1896:Majoreditor 1797:Newyorkbrad 1719:Andrew Gray 1589:Mark Arsten 1442:Arab Spring 1347:Someguy1221 961:User rights 951:CentralAuth 400:Mark Arsten 317:WP:Teahouse 252:Majoreditor 239:Majoreditor 198:as part of 172:Arab Spring 4125:Tito Dutta 3096:Farmbrough 2885:Malcolmxl5 2807:cyberpower 2742:PhilKnight 2684:Keepscases 2664:Guerillero 2617:j⚛e decker 2391:Tom Morris 2100:Rcsprinter 2084:talk to me 2036:Tazerdadog 1635:Tryptofish 1608:Miniapolis 1429:Salvidrim! 1364:-Philippe 1064:.Wolfowitz 944:Cross-wiki 935:AfD closes 847:Discussion 639:Rschen7754 58:Nomination 31:successful 4811:Doc James 4728:Doc James 4338:INeverCry 4224:Greatuser 3728:Callanecc 3655:Adjwilley 3641:Adjwilley 3602:Jezebel's 3550:Wizardman 3031:gwickwire 2539:Nolelover 2443:T. Canens 2424:Gilderien 2296:(Ping me) 2151:Ajraddatz 2003:Tiggerjay 1953:Dreadstar 1936:Ymblanter 1762:Lord Roem 1680:Phightins 1572:SmokeyJoe 1163:Strikeout 1159:Automatic 1016:Doc James 975:this list 930:AfD votes 925:BLP edits 780:block log 582:Gilderien 570:Gilderien 521:disclosed 154:requests. 79:Doc James 5057:Category 4924:contribs 4793:Chequers 4738:contribs 4630:Ret.Prof 4614:Townlake 4554:Townlake 4497:Thompson 4494:Matthew 4481:contribs 4417:Townlake 4380:Townlake 4319:PaleAqua 4302:Guðsþegn 4285:Iselilja 4075:Vacation 4062:Join WER 3813:MastCell 3737:contribs 3679:BWilkins 3530:Ret.Prof 3526:Support: 3445:contribs 3362:GabrielF 3313:Join WER 3168:HighBeam 2914:Support. 2789:Gobōnobō 2758:Armbrust 2578:ragesoss 2320:contribs 2289:Vensatry 1972:Inks.LWC 1909:Support. 1515:Interior 1404:Stalwart 1386:Stalwart 1334:Thompson 1331:Matthew 1315:contribs 1026:contribs 908:Analysis 887:Counters 748:contribs 643:Bwilkins 221:WP:MEDRS 196:HighBeam 180:WP:PSCOI 176:WP:PANDS 147:WP:STiki 89:contribs 73:contribs 5004:Neutral 4878:Kraxler 4846:Lindsay 4599:Kraxler 4517:Snowolf 4434:Sarcasm 4348:Support 4332:Support 4315:Support 4298:Support 4281:Support 4259:Support 4205:Support 4189:Support 4174:Support 4155:Support 4121:Support 4100:Support 4084:Support 4070:Support 4050:DocTree 4046:Support 4015:Support 3998:Support 3981:Support 3935:Support 3921:Support 3904:Support 3859:Support 3842:Support 3822:Support 3795:Support 3781:Rlendog 3777:Support 3750:Support 3723:Support 3714:Lindsay 3709:Support 3692:Support 3671:Support 3635:Support 3622:ɑηsuмaη 3617:Support 3595:Support 3561:Support 3498:Support 3473:Support 3454:Support 3433:Support 3420:Biglulu 3416:Support 3399:Support 3375:Support 3358:Support 3345:Fladrif 3342:Support 3333:(ʞlɐʇ) 3323:Support 3291:Support 3274:Support 3257:Support 3240:Support 3215:Support 3188:Support 3164:Support 3150:Support 3138:Support 3121:Support 3088:Support 3075:Jschnur 3071:Support 3045:Support 3026:Support 2994:Support 2918:assumed 2898:Support 2881:Support 2838:Support 2821:Support 2811:Offline 2802:Support 2784:Support 2767:support 2755:Support 2738:Support 2728:Spencer 2722:Support 2697:Support 2679:Support 2670:My Talk 2659:Support 2647:Support 2627:support 2613:Support 2591:Support 2574:Support 2557:Support 2520:helpful 2507:Support 2490:Support 2473:Support 2456:Support 2419:Support 2411:Snowman 2404:Support 2387:Support 2368:Yunshui 2364:Support 2351:Michael 2334:Legoktm 2330:Support 2307:Support 2281:Support 2253:Support 2219:Support 2183:Support 2170:PStrait 2071:Support 2053:Andreas 2049:Support 2032:Support 2016:Support 1999:Support 1985:Support 1968:Support 1949:Support 1932:Support 1892:Support 1868:King of 1864:Support 1851:Carrite 1847:Support 1832:Support 1810:Support 1793:Support 1780:Wehwalt 1776:Support 1757:Support 1732:Support 1715:Support 1698:Support 1666:Support 1653:Nyttend 1648:Support 1627:Support 1602:Support 1585:Support 1568:Support 1544:Support 1528:Support 1506:Support 1473:Support 1377:Support 1360:Support 1343:Support 1326:Support 1303:Stoatυs 1272:Support 1252:Support 1133:LlamaAl 1096:Support 1007:Support 755:deleted 711:believe 486:WP:COI+ 416:WP:AN/I 186:and at 138:WP:OTRS 5025:cntrb. 4987:unique 4971:Ocaasi 4860:Kurtis 4819:Kurtis 4700:Kurtis 4680:Cmach7 4676:Oppose 4655:Oppose 4578:Ocaasi 4569:Ocaasi 4542:(talk) 4469:Statυs 4395:Silver 4372:Oppose 4360:(talk) 4244:tools. 4160:Graham 4142:Sitush 4138:Suppor 4019:Nick-D 3832:jones 3767:report 3565:Slon02 3543:Oppose 3478:Mark91 3459:Silver 3279:Rzuwig 3244:rogerd 3166:, per 3049:WP:DRN 3000:WP:100 2936:Ocaasi 2922:Kilopi 2916:I had 2904:Ks0stm 2869:Salvio 2651:Jayjg 2347:Supprt 2204:Steven 2106:(chat) 2077:Pol430 2022:madman 1990:Errant 1746:(Talk) 1702:Mifter 1558:(talk) 1519:(Talk) 1461:Kurtis 1446:Kurtis 1282:unique 1222:Risker 1147:mabdul 1058:Kiefer 1041:Secret 994:Kurtis 979:Kurtis 894:XTools 738:Ocaasi 715:Ocaasi 684:Ocaasi 614:Ocaasi 610:badges 557:Ocaasi 525:Ocaasi 494:Ocaasi 461:Ocaasi 452:WP:COI 445:No. I 432:Kilopi 421:WP:BRD 387:Ocaasi 358:useful 326:Ocaasi 321:WP:AFD 273:WP:BRD 226:Ocaasi 143:WP:AIV 105:Ocaasi 63:Ocaasi 47:Ocaasi 4992:names 4871:Note: 4815:RexxS 4789:Spiel 4753:RexxS 4742:email 4400:seren 4272:TALK 4181:garra 4111:Mate1 4106:Royal 3763:~~ → 3606:Ponyo 3464:seren 3196:RP459 3174:Trevj 3036:edits 2825:Bbb23 2638:talk 2561:RexxS 2408:Giant 2209:Zhang 2187:olive 1633:.) -- 1287:names 1204:ceran 1116:Monty 1030:email 836:civil 762:count 663:Bbb23 627:Cmach 93:email 16:< 5020:tlk. 4956:talk 4920:talk 4914:. -- 4910:and 4898:talk 4882:talk 4834:talk 4813:and 4784:Ϣere 4771:talk 4757:talk 4734:talk 4716:talk 4684:talk 4634:talk 4618:talk 4603:talk 4593:and 4558:talk 4475:talk 4421:talk 4384:talk 4323:talk 4306:talk 4289:talk 4250:talk 4229:t@lk 4178:Gnan 4146:talk 4129:talk 4058:cont 4054:ʞlɐʇ 4037:talk 4023:talk 4006:talk 3989:talk 3968:talk 3941:stay 3912:talk 3892:talk 3873:coxn 3850:talk 3785:talk 3741:logs 3733:talk 3700:talk 3660:talk 3646:talk 3586:talk 3578:Phew 3569:talk 3534:talk 3441:talk 3424:talk 3407:talk 3366:talk 3349:talk 3265:talk 3248:talk 3179:talk 3129:talk 3110:Step 3093:Rich 3079:talk 3009:Ched 2980:talk 2926:talk 2889:talk 2829:talk 2775:talk 2746:talk 2711:Talk 2688:talk 2582:talk 2565:talk 2498:talk 2481:talk 2464:talk 2447:talk 2428:Chat 2395:talk 2355:talk 2338:talk 2316:talk 2259:stay 2244:talk 2227:talk 2191:talk 2174:talk 2156:Talk 2139:Talk 2040:talk 2007:talk 1976:talk 1940:talk 1921:bark 1900:talk 1855:talk 1801:talk 1784:talk 1767:talk 1739:LuK3 1723:talk 1706:talk 1657:talk 1639:talk 1631:this 1616:talk 1593:talk 1576:talk 1535:talk 1497:talk 1481:talk 1368:talk 1351:talk 1309:talk 1243:talk 1226:talk 1211:thor 1137:talk 1104:talk 1100:John 1083:talk 1022:talk 823:talk 807:here 792:rfar 774:logs 742:talk 701:talk 680:here 667:talk 651:talk 641:and 605:here 586:Chat 490:here 447:have 319:and 269:here 256:talk 178:and 85:talk 67:talk 4695:why 4661:Axl 4442:ΛΧΣ 4265:dci 4261:. 3950:sic 3828:Ron 3760:123 3755:Ebe 3511:); 3390:fax 3380:Jus 3325:-- 3222:Zad 3193:-- 3172:-- 3113:hen 2969:. — 2854:Jay 2851:Jay 2633:DGG 2527:one 2513:The 2268:sic 2120:fox 2062:466 1816:ΛΧΣ 1765:~ ( 1512:The 1477:Deb 1410:111 1392:111 1263:ley 1260:and 1257:TBr 1122:845 819:KTC 798:spi 768:AfD 693:bad 635:12. 577:11. 547:10. 539:ΛΧΣ 134:CSD 5059:: 4982:No 4979:-- 4958:) 4926:) 4922:/ 4900:) 4884:) 4876:. 4836:) 4773:) 4759:) 4740:· 4736:· 4718:) 4686:) 4636:) 4620:) 4605:) 4560:) 4478:, 4466:— 4438:— 4423:) 4386:) 4325:) 4308:) 4291:) 4269:| 4252:) 4165:87 4148:) 4131:) 4060:) 4039:) 4025:) 4008:) 3991:) 3970:) 3956:! 3914:) 3894:) 3852:) 3787:) 3743:) 3739:• 3735:• 3702:) 3685:) 3683:←✎ 3675:✉→ 3598:-- 3588:) 3571:) 3536:) 3515:; 3447:) 3443:/ 3435:-- 3426:) 3409:) 3385:da 3368:) 3351:) 3328:DQ 3302:2¢ 3299:- 3267:) 3250:) 3229:68 3181:) 3131:) 3099:, 3081:) 3015:? 3012:: 3004:— 2928:) 2891:) 2831:) 2777:) 2748:) 2690:) 2667:| 2640:) 2600:✍ 2584:) 2567:) 2500:) 2483:) 2466:) 2458:-- 2449:) 2397:) 2357:) 2340:) 2318:• 2274:! 2246:) 2229:) 2223:LK 2193:) 2176:) 2132:NW 2058:JN 2042:) 2009:) 1978:) 1942:) 1902:) 1885:♠ 1857:) 1836:Mr 1803:) 1786:) 1769:) 1725:) 1708:) 1672:Go 1659:) 1641:) 1620:) 1595:) 1578:) 1570:-- 1537:) 1499:) 1483:) 1370:) 1353:) 1312:, 1300:— 1298:. 1277:No 1245:) 1237:- 1228:) 1194:) 1177:• 1139:) 1106:) 1085:) 1028:· 1024:· 977:? 825:) 817:. 786:lu 709:I 703:) 669:) 653:) 600:A: 553:A: 516:A: 506:9. 443:A: 437:8. 411:A: 405:7. 353:A: 344:6. 299:A: 293:5. 289:A: 265:A: 258:) 244:4. 216:A: 210:3. 168:A: 162:2. 129:A: 123:1. 91:· 87:· 36:. 4954:( 4918:( 4896:( 4880:( 4832:( 4769:( 4755:( 4732:( 4714:( 4682:( 4666:¤ 4632:( 4616:( 4601:( 4556:( 4484:) 4472:( 4462:) 4458:( 4419:( 4382:( 4321:( 4304:( 4287:( 4248:( 4231:) 4227:( 4144:( 4127:( 4089:œ 4056:· 4052:( 4035:( 4021:( 4004:( 3987:( 3966:( 3954:) 3946:( 3937:— 3910:( 3890:( 3877:\ 3870:u 3867:ʈ 3848:( 3830:h 3802:P 3799:T 3793:' 3783:( 3731:( 3698:( 3662:) 3658:( 3653:~ 3648:) 3644:( 3639:~ 3584:( 3567:( 3532:( 3507:( 3439:( 3422:( 3405:( 3364:( 3347:( 3307:© 3263:( 3246:( 3201:/ 3177:( 3127:( 3104:. 3077:( 3002:) 2983:) 2977:( 2950:1 2948:+ 2924:( 2887:( 2827:( 2773:( 2744:( 2686:( 2636:( 2603:✉ 2580:( 2563:( 2496:( 2479:( 2462:( 2445:( 2430:| 2393:( 2378:水 2375:‍ 2372:雲 2353:( 2336:( 2322:) 2314:( 2285:— 2272:) 2264:( 2255:— 2242:( 2225:( 2197:) 2189:( 2172:( 2158:) 2154:( 2142:) 2136:( 2122:j 2110:@ 2038:( 2005:( 1974:( 1958:☥ 1938:( 1898:( 1882:♣ 1877:♦ 1872:♥ 1853:( 1839:X 1799:( 1782:( 1721:( 1704:( 1688:! 1655:( 1637:( 1612:( 1591:( 1574:( 1533:( 1495:( 1479:( 1366:( 1349:( 1318:) 1306:( 1241:( 1224:( 1183:) 1180:C 1173:T 1169:( 1135:( 1102:( 1081:( 1020:( 874:e 867:t 860:v 821:( 810:. 800:) 795:· 789:· 783:· 777:· 771:· 765:· 758:· 751:· 745:· 740:( 699:( 665:( 649:( 630:7 608:( 588:| 291:: 254:( 83:( 70:· 65:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Ocaasi - Knowledge (XXG)

Index