Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Colin M

82:) – It's my pleasure to present to you Colin M for consideration. While Colin first registered for Knowledge (XXG) in 2007 he started editing more seriously in 2019. Since then he has worked to improve a variety of articles, including five he has brought in the last year to Good Article status. You will also find him knowledgeable about Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, with a particular focus on Article Titles. He has brought that expertise to his work in closing Requested Move discussions. The content he has produced often requires sensitivity and you will find him a thoughtful collaborator and one who is willing to lend help to others where he can. This combination of qualities should make Colin a capable administrator and I hope you join me in supporting him. 1135:

area. As one example, there are numerous instances of "Joe Blow (East Bumfuck politician)" when there's not an article or even a redirect at "Joe Blow (politician)". As another example, ATDAB suggests that natural disambiguation should be favored when a subject is referred to as such in sources, even if such a reference is not dominant among available sources as a whole. Once again, this is not followed to any great extent. The editors who for years and years have consistently defaulted to unnecessarily-disambiguated titles appear to take a stance of "Why, this is the way we've been doing it all along", and somehow that takes precedence over ATDAB, a policy. Why has this been allowed to become such a problem?

633:

obvious vandalism and spam) before dealing with more complex ones. Since admins are experienced editors who have earned the trust of the community, any case where they might need to be blocked will probably be a lot more complicated than a run-of-the-mill spammer or purely disruptive account. So I would probably leave such cases to a more experienced admin. The one exception I can imagine would be if I happened to be the first to observe an admin causing serious disruption due (presumably) to their account being compromised. If I observed this, I would issue a quick emergency block and refer the case to the Administrator's noticeboard.

2915:

a default to the GNG and its application. The complex, difficult AfDs (and subsequent DRVs) arise because of *how* the GNG is interpreted (what exactly is SIGCOV? how does SIGCOV vary in different contexts? what is OR and synth? etc). However, I'm equally mindful that we are also making assessments of an editor's potential and that as participants in this project here we should all be assessed equally in good faith, and I see nothing here to counter that presumption. That said, I'm happy to support because civil and a clue is as good an indicator of potential as any! Regards and good luck, --

252:, even if you're confident that you're right. Spending a long time in pursuit of a change that makes the encyclopedia a little bit better can ultimately feel a little silly when you realize you could have instead spent the same amount of time to make 20 other uncontroversial edits which each improve the project just as much. On the other hand, if it's a truly important matter and 1-on-1 discussion is clearly not heading toward consensus, that's when I would consider bringing more voices into the conversation, for example by posting a neutral notice to a Wikiproject, or opening an RfC. 3294:– Knowledge (XXG) needs more admins that are experienced in significant content creation, and Colin M certainly has sufficiency in that. After some cursory snooping around, not seeing any reason to !vote oppose or place in neutral either. Furthermore, Colin M has clearly demonstrated how access to the admin toolset will enable them to further improve Knowledge (XXG). Lastly, the opinions expressed by Barkeep49 and Ritchie333 in the nominations section atop are very convincing. 4851:- Putting myself in neutral for now. Perhaps this should be framed as a question, but my first pass at posing one felt more like a comment with a ~"do you still think this" at the end, and nobody likes those. Colin can feel free to respond or not (here, on the talk page, on my talk page, etc.). There is an old debate over what kinds of expression should be permitted on userpages, which frequently manifests when userboxes are nominate for deletion. There was an 776:

I do try to reach out and point them to relevant policies and resources. And if anyone comes to my talk page seeking advice, I would of course try to help them out if it's related to an area I'm familiar with (e.g. article naming policy, RMs, GA reviews, image licensing), or, if not, try to direct them to someone who can help them. (I can't say this has happened to me much in the past, but I can imagine it might be a more common experience for admins.)

4898: 4882:-- that they are sides of culture wars which should should all be allowed or all be disallowed. Colin is far from the only person to make this argument, and I'm sure it was more to avoid disruption rather than truly thinking they're equal positions, but it does ultimately rely on a troubling false equivalence that causes me to be reluctant to support (which I probably otherwise would, given his positive contributions). — 3032:- I am familiar with Colin M, having seen him around regularly and often; always impressed with his manner and clue. And I respect the nominators, trusting their judgement without reservation. In total, this sums to confident, easy support, for me. I am thankful that Colin M is willing to serve as an admin and hope that more, equally qualified candidates, will follow his example and volunteer their candidacy as well.-- 4968:. I had forgotten about that MfD that Rhododendrites mentioned, but it's a valid point. There is somewhat of a moral conundrum that Knowledge (XXG) faces when it comes to userboxes of political expression. Still, I'm a bit on the fence as to whether that sort of judgment is what we would look for in an administrator, particularly if they will be involved in RMs. Would be a support otherwise. -- 102:

backlog. I've been particularly impressed with his contributions during content debates, such as at AfD, where his opinions regularly match the final consensus, and show he can politely respect views of those who disagree with him. He shows the right attitude and communication skills that I believe are essential for administrators to have, and I’m happy to endorse this request for adminship.

931:, a deadname has a very different status from other sorts of former names in terms of its ability to cause harm to a living person and violate their privacy, and that an important function of MOS:DEADNAME is to lay out these BLP considerations, but my (sloppy) comparison was not intended to refer to that aspect of the policy. (Sorry for the long response, but there was a lot to unpack here.) 1005:

process (e.g. if they're writing a new article, do they draft it locally in a text file until it's ready to go, or do they build it up gradually on-wiki in the Draft namespace?). I'd like to see the community be receptive to adminship for an editor with well under, say, 10,000 edits, if that editor can present other evidence of a record of high-quality contributions to the project.

906:, and when it did, I'm not sure it actually had the meaning that I was reading into it (I think I was understanding it as saying, basically, that in the case of deceased trans people, their deadname may be included somewhere in the article if widely reported in RS, but if the subject was not notable under that name, it should not be placed in the lead sentence as a matter of 3373:. I see in the neutral comments below that this user is suggested to have tolerated anti-gay free speech. Maybe. I oppose tolerance of negative or hostile perspectives but I do not expect everyone to know all the winning answers for every sensitive discourse. Overall I evaluate this user's position as being on the on the right side of debates in advocating for diversity. 5109:

discussions and I am pleased that Colin is evidence that my thinking could be correct. Accurately conveying what the community is willing to accept is, I feel, a not inconseuqential element to having more people run both so that potential nominators consider them and so that the potential candidates don't self select out. Best,

518:: Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia (not a soapbox or advertising platform), and it is written from a neutral point of view. Those who work to keep UPE under control have my deep respect, but since it's not an area I have much experience with, I'm not in a great position to suggest solutions. I will say, I think the essay 5245:

It being the idea that people need 15,000 - 20,000 edits? I can find other counter examples of people passing, going back to my own RfA in 2019 where I didn't have that amount. I put forward Colin here with less than 10k and I will gladly put forward others with less than 15k without a moment's pause

5108:

I think this is a great example of conventional wisdom about RfA that is wrong and that we're proving wrong at this RfA, where at the time of the question Colin was passing 108/0/2. I think the community is open to a far wider range of editor profiles at RfA than can sometimes be conveyed in abstract

2914:

generally my bar for these things is civil and has a clue (ie no big deal) ... which is clearly met here. At the same time the neutral comments below and some of the responses to the questions above did give me pause. To me, in asking about inclusionism/deletionism and AfD I had hoped for more than

1141:

I can't say I can recall encountering the issue you describe of needlessly specific parenthetical disambiguators for politicians, though I agree, that does sound out of line with policy. (And I would be surprised if such a title were endorsed at RM. If you have any examples, I'd be interested to see,

1134:

suggests that parenthetical disambiguation should be a last resort, not a first resort, and that if parenthetical disambiguation is used, the disambiguator should be kept as short as possible. I've done a lot of work on political biographies and this has been widely ignored in the case of this topic

775:

I'm not as diligent about this as some other editors (such as those who regularly monitor the Tea House for questions from new editors), but when, in the course of my regular editing or watchlist-reviewing, I see a good faith editor struggling or making a mistake in an area that might be new to them,

542:

In your answer to Q1, the examples where having admin tools rather than just page mover rights are necessary seem to apply in a small percentage of RM situations. Overall then, how do you view your role at RM changing going from being a page mover to being an admin? Or more generally, how do you view

380:

and would be unlikely to do admin work there. I participated in requested move discussions for months before I started closing any, and when I finally did, I started with cases where consensus was very clear, and gradually worked my way up to more challenging closures. I would take a similar approach

605:

procedure was a next-best approach available to page-movers as a workaround. Based on that, my default would be to switch to using G6 over pageswap in most of these (redirect with minor history) cases, but the framing of your question makes me think you might prefer swaps as the default procedure. I

475:

I want to know your thinking of this theoretical scenario, you observe very reliable sources giving different information on a statement made in an article, what do you do about that? There is no specific “right answer” per se, but I want to understand your thought process, in order to ascertain if

4936:

In doing some additional research to try to come off the fence one way or the other, I didn't find that much. A couple mildly concerning things that I won't bother with here, but nothing to push me into oppose. That brings me back to my original reason for being in the neutral section. Now, I don't

4757:

I was initially concerned that this user has <200 page moves, which strikes me as being low for someone whose stated focus is RM and article titles. I've now had the pleasure of discussing our perspectives regarding RM and while we certainly see some things differently, I join others here in the

3114:

Their usual bits are good, with good noms, but I wanted to address the concern raised in the neutrals, from editors I respect. I actually view it as a positive, in an admin, that they can take the neutrality we need even if their personal morals would drive them one way. I hold the same position as

989:

In recent years, our RfA processes have become increasingly stringent. You are currently an editor with less than 10,000 edits. Currently, any editor with less than 15,000 or 20,000 edits would generally be doomed to fail. What are your thoughts on this and how would you address the Knowledge (XXG)

768:

Hello candidate... Thank you for your contributions. You seem to be a fit candidate for admin and you already have my support. My question is pretty straighforward but kindly answer if you can. If you get the community's approval and become an admin, would you be willing to volunteer in the simpler

712:

more than 1/2 and a bit less than 2/3 of your actions at AfD occurred over a three day period in February 2019. Whereas in the last six months, there appears to be only 16 !votes. I'm conscious of not drawing conclusions regarding AfD stats and an editor's views, and given that, I was wondering if

247:

Rarely. My content work is mostly in obscure corners, and, fortunately, the atmosphere at RM is pretty consistently respectful and collegial. When a content dispute does come up, I try to resolve it through talk page discussion, assuming good faith. An important lesson that took me a while to learn

450:

where I've had a closure informally challenged. This was an unusual case where I found consensus for a position supported by a minority of participants, so I can understand the editor's confusion. I tried to explain the reasoning behind my close in more detail, with reference to certain principles

158:

discussions. I've been active at RM for a while, both as a participant and a closer, and having the admin bit would make it easier to close a wider range of discussions (for example, by making it easier to move over a redirect with history, or in cases where a page is fully move-protected). RM has

1021:

You already have my support either way, but I'd like to ask this: I think that you already 3/4ths covered this, but would you agree that at this point you don't have enough experience in the relevant areas to be making heavier duty conduct-related decisions such as blocking experienced editors on

1004:

to repair wikilinks en masse following a page move). An editor's edit count will be extremely sensitive to what kind of work they prefer (whether that's more on the side of small, high-volume, tool-assisted edits, or more in-depth contributions), as well as incidental details around their editing

792:

Well, now that you brought it up, which of your vital organs is most important to you? j/k On a serious note, I was impressed with the number of GAs you've promoted/reviewed, so I took a quick look at the articles you created. What jumped out at me is the substantial number of articles without a

739:

should be understood as complementing GNG rather than replacing it. When it comes to judgement calls on whether GNG is satisfied (particularly in deciding whether the coverage given by a particular source is "significant"), I think it's important to bear in mind the reason that GNG works so well:

632:

As I mentioned above, I'm more interested in doing admin work related to content (e.g. closures at RM and similar venues) rather than conduct, so I wouldn't expect to do much blocking of anyone. If I were to wade into this area, I would want to develop experience with straightforward cases (e.g.

507:

You already have my support, I’m indeed impressed by your response, second question, and this doesn’t really change anything, my name has become quite synonymous with fighting Undisclosed paid editing, what are your thoughts about UPE or, what do you think is an ideal approach to get rid of such

304:

can edit had actually blossomed into a vast, high-quality information source relied on by a sizable fraction of the world's population, they would never believe you. I think Consensus is the key reason Knowledge (XXG) doesn't end up looking like the wall of a public bathroom. Using consensus for

101:

Colin M is the sort of potential administrator I like to see, somebody who has done a lot of work on improving the encyclopedia in neglected areas (including several good articles), politely and helpfully assisted others do the same, and would now like to help out with some of the administrative

1150:

is an example of disagreement about the role of natural disambiguation among some of our most naming-policy-savvy editors, with some arguing that the de facto practice at RM has even drifted away from a plain reading of the guideline. I'd like to see the community move toward a more consistent,

730:

That's funny, I didn't realize my activity there was quite so concentrated in time, but looking back, that makes sense. Early 2019 was the very beginning of when I started falling down the Knowledge (XXG) rabbit hole, so I would have had brief spurts of activity in different areas as I tried on

4599:

per noms and above. The only thing raised in neutrals below does not really bother me since the candidate clearly only wanted to raise awareness of how majority sentiments can potentially be misused. Personally, I prefer people declaring their biases loud and proud. It makes it easier to spot

1054:

What a doozy of a question! As a baseline, I think Knowledge (XXG)'s self-governance is quite effective. As I said in my answer to Q4, I think the decision-making process of consensus, arrived at via public discussions which all editors can view and participate in, is fantastic. This makes me

1062:

that skeeve me out (mandatory training sessions for admins, and a requirement to pledge their "regard and adherence to the UCoC"), and while the document pays lip service to transparency, my concern is that these new processes will ultimately result in less transparency, and therefore less

1920:- A sensitive and thoughtful editor. I reviewed one of their GAs, and while we disagreed on some of the finer points, they communicated with great eloquence. There are emotional aspects to building an encyclopedia, and I think this editor has a handle on what it means to work with others. 491:. In rare cases, common sense will dictate that one answer is clearly correct and the other is a simple error. For example, sources A, B, C, and D say something happened in 1521 and source E says it happened in 1251. In these cases, I probably wouldn't bother to note the discrepancy. 415:

Sure, at a high level, I can say I definitely wouldn't want to continue being an admin if my peers decide I'm no longer fit. I'll admit to being a bit green about the context and details surrounding recall but, having browsed some of the criteria used by current admins,

926:

exists and dictates that a subject's birth name should generally be included in the first sentence of the lead (without regard to how widely it's reported in RS, or how relevant it is to the subject's claim to notability). I understand that, from the perspective of

4137:

At a minimum answers to questions seem generally considered and sensible, and I think I'd be on a loser trying to dig up any significant problems, and it seems no-one has found any so far. Best wishes to what seems a good candidate. 21:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

819:

As an editor, I actually personally like having a red talk page link over a blue link to a talk page that's empty but for some standard templates, since it signals in advance that the reader is not going to find any existing discussion about the page. (And

565:

until a technical request is fulfilled). So in short, I don't see the nature of my role in RM changing. It would just make it easier for me to close certain requests. (As for what proportion of moves would involve admin tools, see my answer to your next

4739:

Trusted, well-qualified candidate. Good noms, good answers. Unlikely to delete the main page. To the candidate: expect more stress--find a way to process it in a healthy way while keeping your course. Even the finest of us run hot from time to time.

897:

Reviewing it, I can now see that the argument in the last paragraph of that mini-essay that you've quoted is extremely muddled. The "That's a great policy. Why aren't we applying it to everyone?" statement was in relation to a specific sentence from

653:, and I saw your support for stubs. I have gone through your articles a bit, and saw many have nothing to do with stubs. Do you want to add anything to to your support for stubs? I myself felt a bit puzzled, but else I guess you will make fine admin. 2415:—Our standards for adminship have become increasingly stringent, where we have to just pile opposes on people who have less than 15,000 or 20,000 edits. I have no objection to this user becoming an administrator and seriously hope for us to loosen 526:) promotional content can have the unintended effect of actually rewarding or incentivizing COI editing, but there are pros and cons of each approach, and the overall problem of detecting and dealing with promotional content is incredibly complex. 191:, it's gone from 10 kilobytes and 4 footnotes to 80 kilobytes and 160 footnotes (though I can't claim all the credit, and there's still lots of room for improvement). I've also created several dozen articles from scratch, with topics ranging from 365:

Are there any areas of adminship you do not plan to participate in, due to unfamiliarity or lack of technical knowledge? If you later decided you wanted to help in these areas, what would be your plan to become an effective admin in those areas?

1549:

trusts you, I am inclined too to trust you. Once again good work on the remarkable answering of my question. They have given a honest well thought out response to my second question and this solidified my stance on them deserving the mop.

731:

different ways of contributing to see what fit. As for the inclusionism-deletionism spectrum, I personally think this framing leaves a lot to be desired, and I don't think my views can be easily placed along this axis. I will say, I think

482:

Great question. I've actually encountered this scenario pretty frequently. My usual approach is to hedge between the options in the body and add an explanatory footnote explaining the discrepancy in the sources. For examples of this, see

3550:- good reason for wanting admin powers. Limited demonstration of engagement with the full range of admin tasks, but enough evidence of good judgement in what we have. Decent content editing, good response to question about edit count. — 1151:

consensus understanding of how natural disambiguation should be used, whether that involves rewriting parts of the current guideline or just coming to a more widely agreed on reading of the current wording, but it's going to take time.

1055:

generally wary of any top-down efforts from the Wikimedia Foundation that undermine our self-governance. My understanding of the incentives and processes that drive the WMF is spotty, but what I have seen often makes me uncomfortable.

582:

Another follow-up to your answer to Q1, would you continue to preserve page history as much as possible (to the extent appropriate) using round-robin moves and other techniques using suppressredirect, or do you view the ability to

553:(even non-pagemovers), and I share this view. In theory, there's nothing preventing me from closing any RM, and then just getting help from an admin when necessary to effect the technical requirements (e.g. by filing requests at 2872:: good temperament, strong knowledge of policy and guidelines, and nothing of concern has been raised. Whenever I've seen their name around, it's for something positive and well-written or thoughtful. Thanks for running! — 5171:" stuff is. At best it's another shiny hat to collect, but at worst, I can see the lack of such a "service award" being used as fodder against someone at RFA. Still, that may just be paranoia. It thankfully does feel like 797:(my area of interest as a photog) but was curious as to why you didn't create the TPs when you created the articles, and if you are willing to create them before you get really busy being an administrator? Happy editing, 5246:

in the future. A successful candidate should be about the wealth of experience and depth of understanding of policy and while that does take several thousand edits but it definitely doesn't require 15-20 thousand. Best,

1067:

about civility, and our community's tolerance of insulting and disrespectful rhetoric is sometimes a little higher than I would like it to be. But I don't think the WMF are the ones who should be solving this problem.

5105:

914:

to the old version in case it helps anyone trying to follow along), and I think the overall argument the mini-essay makes about due weight as applied to birth names stands much more clearly without the comparison to

3370: 300:. It is absolutely amazing to me that Knowledge (XXG) functions as well as it does – if you traveled to a parallel universe without Knowledge (XXG) and tried to explain to someone there how an encyclopedia that 3063:- has something they want the mop for, and the measured responses to the questions don't raise any red flags. Neither do the comments below re userboxes. I also trust the judgement of the nominators. 708:

Thank you for volunteering. I'm well aware that many of us edit in waves and our interests vary over time, but I noticed in the nomination a comment about your participation at AfD. According to the

606:

can see pros and cons there. I don't want to get too into the weeds of what's already a bit of an "inside baseball" topic here, but I'd definitely be interested in having a discussion about this at

1058:

The wording of the UCoC itself is mostly anodyne and unobjectionable, but I have concerns about how they will translate into concrete processes and enforcement mechanisms. There are aspects of the

1735: 5058: 268:

per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

261: 3997:. I'm new to the RM area but I've seen Colin do a really fine job in here. His answers to the various questions were compelling too. I'm glad that a fellow Page mover is running for Adminship. 4852: 626:

Would you ever block an Administrator when necessary? And would your process for doing so be the same process as blocking an editor who isn't an admin? If not, what would you do differently?

4922:

Thanks for offering me a chance to respond. The one point I really want to clarify/emphasize here is that I absolutely do not see these viewpoints as being of equal moral or social value.

3979:

per all above !votes. I believe that this nominee will use their admin rights and abilities for good. Good candidate with extensible track record of writing and settling disputes. Cheers!

4795:

The rationale for this nomination and Colin's answers to the questions are very sensible. What I've seen of Colin's editing over the years has been good, and he should make a good admin.

1000:

noisy signal for measuring experience. Some of my individual edits (mostly article creations) represent several hours of work. Others represent just a few seconds each (e.g. when I use

853: 752:

managed to create such an article, that strongly inclines me toward considering GNG satisfied (even if each of the individual secondary sources only has, say, a page of coverage).

3962:— Amazing editor, with a long history on writing about difficult subjects and settling disputes. I think the nominee will go very far if they are given the administrator rights. 288:

This feels a bit like choosing which of my vital organs are most important! I think the project would be irreparably harmed if any of its core content policies went away, with

163:

in recent months, and I'd like to be able to more effectively help clearing it out. I'd be open to helping out in other admin areas as well, but moves are my bread and butter.

282:

Hey there ~ thanks for allowing your name to be put forward. What do you think is the most important (if such a thing exists) or valuable of all our guidelines or policies?

561:). But I would prefer to be able to close without making work for someone else, and these scenarios can cause tricky coordination problems (e.g. I may need to hold off on 476:

you are capable of making good judgement, so could you be so kind as to please explain your course of action if you observe the aforementioned hypothetically scenario?

309:. If decision-making was done by a straight vote or through some top-down process, I don't think the project could have ever achieved the remarkable success that it has. 594: 562: 241:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

5274: 1146:

leaves a fair bit of room for interpretation. Where do we draw the line between a name by which a subject is "commonly called in English RS" vs. an "obscure" name?

3793:

The concern raised in the neutral section is valid, but I am satisfied with Colin's response and I otherwise have no qualms with him becoming an administrator. --

1342: 1337: 1483: 1059: 713:

you could give some indication or comment of where you sit (or perhaps you feel you do not) within the spectrum of inclusionism/deletionism? Kind regards, --

3162:. A thoughtful editor who can express themselves calmly in discussions and has contributed good supporting work. Definitely a net positive for the project. 4937:

think the response above actually gets at the issue. That is, the issue was never seeing those perspectives as having equal moral/social value, but rather

1997: 5292: 5010: 1198: 141:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1085:. As I'm British, I'm unsure how polite or rude the word may be considered. It seems a good illustration of the difficulty of policing language here. 918:

So my question was not "why does MOS:DEADNAME not currently apply to everyone?", but rather "why does not currently apply to everyone?". The answer to

2172: 947:

I'm probably just blind, but do you have a link to your good articles somewhere? I clicked the articles on your userpage, but none of them were GAs.

3097:. As a fellow Requested Moves regular, I'm familiar with the candidate and have positive impressions, confirmed by thoughtful replies to questions. 3986: 2845:

editor, although Rhododendrites and WaltCip raise valid points. I trust the candidate to steer clear of what I think of as wedge-issue userboxes.

836:). But I certainly don't begrudge editors who like creating missing talk pages as a form of gnoming work, adding wikiproject templates and such. 5006: 1280: 447: 4114: 3325:

Colin M has done a lot of work with RM and even if I don't always agree with them I agree with others that their participation is positive.

2477:

Looks like a solid editor. A cursory look at their contribs and various stats failed to turn up any red or yellow flags. Happy to support. -

1099:

That Wiktionary definition seems overly narrow to me. My intended meaning was more in line with the OED's gloss of "to make uncomfortable".

4438: 2031: 1185: 2460:

Ooh, a candidate for the mop who plans to use the mop for mopping first and foremost. An admingnome, if you will. Yes, I like that idea.

4552: 4153: 3641: 372:

I'm generally more interested in working in areas related to content rather than conduct, so I have little familiarity with venues like

1332: 1228: 33: 17: 5062: 3694: 1891: 1222: 519: 3503: 2637:

His opinion on the straight pride Mfd does not concern me even though I think the userboxes were inappropriate. I have no concerns.

1815: 3745:. We always need more sysops who are familiar with the RM process, and Colin M is clearly competent and trustworthy. No concerns. 4905: 4719: 2048: 1411: 911: 832:). So I don't generally proactively create talk pages for articles I create (unless I'm going to immediately start a discussion, 110: 1147: 4677:

Not known to me (or maybe just not noticed?), but seems a reasonable and useful sort, so I see no reason not to support. · · ·

4327: 3452: 3263: 1993: 1694:

I haven't interacted with the candidate but I am happy to support based on nominator, co-nominator and answers to questions. --

1646: 1192: 188: 601:

deletion is the default method for dealing with redirects with minor history that block a move. My understanding was that the

5139:

edits and yet that is nothing, as it is probably just mass-fixing of curly quotes in articles. Meanwhile, someone could have

4381: 3807: 2731: 2324: 5083: 3003:

instant yes. Reviewed a GA nom of mine and gave a review that was independent, thorough, thoughtful and full of good sense.

1541:

did justice to my question. I wanted to hear something along those lines and they delivered! I’m impressed. Furthermore if

5205: 4014: 3888: 2560: 2168: 1591: 1252: 1178: 79: 1368: 5155: 4067: 4028:— I have checked some of his editions and interactions with other users, and I think he would make an excellent admin.-- 3967: 3824: 3750: 3499: 2507: 2431: 1699: 658: 417: 740:

because, without significant coverage in independent reliable sources, you're probably not going to be able to write a

3983: 3850: 2264: 2044: 1358: 305:

decision-making elevates good arguments over noise, it encourages civility, and attracts thoughtful editors who are

4121: 3615: 3486: 3448: 2940: 1989: 1496: 958: 219: 1306: 1237: 4377: 3950: 3202: 2294: 2065: 1832: 1760: 1429: 1273: 1090: 833: 5079: 709: 452: 121:

I accept. Thank you Barkeep and Ritchie for the kind words. I have never edited for pay, or on another account.

5045: 4727: 4434: 3574: 2753: 2642: 2164: 2027: 1327: 1045: 966: 3371:

commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/06#review of 1950s American published gay erotica 🏳️‍🌈🌈

4113:– I did not remember coming across this editor before (for the record, we did have a positive interaction on 2584:. I am a Novice wikipedian, yet in my time I have seen many great contributions, and yours are no exception. 1322: 4547: 4364: 4149: 4063: 3963: 3820: 3746: 3634: 3407: 3334: 3240: 3184: 2814: 2503: 1695: 1624: 821: 808: 654: 641: 4141: 1490:. He certainly seemed to consider other points of view, even if he did not quite finish up the exchange. 1143: 5143:

edits creating a featured article, and that is far much more work than 100,000 meaningless quote fixes. —

4701: 4230: 3980: 3381: 3102: 2974: 2675: 2625: 2464: 2189: 1976: 1959: 1888: 1743: 1557: 3569:– Qualified candidate, decent knowledge of policies and record of RM closures. Will make a good admin! – 1595: 297: 5221: 4681: 4587: 4542: 4505: 4346: 4118: 4050: 3784: 3482: 3469: 3296: 3120: 2791: 2659: 2591: 2482: 2215: 1811: 1574: 692:. I don't have anything in particular to add about stubs, beyond what I wrote in the linked quasi-essay. 333: 5273:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

1491: 1487: 1248: 1142:

if you don't mind dropping a link on my talk page.) As for your second example, the current wording of

1301: 5204:

precisely because of hat-collecting concerns. In any case, I agree they're pretty pointless things.

4782: 4529: 4417: 3946: 3933: 3733: 3515:– solid editor with the right attitude. Thoughtful answers to the questions. Will make a good admin. 3197: 3037: 2991: 2920: 2855: 2691: 2281: 2148: 2091: 2061: 1828: 1756: 1409: 1266: 1086: 1036: 962: 861: 857: 827: 718: 650: 397: 317: 108: 4094:

Looks good. Per the usual, as an entry level admin, not ready for heavy duty conduct-related items.

3308:

trust the nominators, and cannot remember a time where I had a negative interaction with this user.

735:

is a really, really good policy. Simple, elegant, and works really well in practice. I think a good

607: 515: 456: 5255: 5251: 5240: 5225: 5191: 5162: 5118: 5114: 5087: 5066: 5049: 5041: 5033: 5016: 5000: 4984: 4954: 4947: 4931: 4917: 4891: 4884: 4820: 4804: 4787: 4767: 4749: 4731: 4723: 4706: 4684: 4669: 4652: 4646: 4636: 4611: 4591: 4574: 4557: 4533: 4516: 4490: 4486: 4473: 4468: 4459: 4452: 4442: 4430: 4421: 4404: 4385: 4368: 4351: 4332: 4308: 4291: 4274: 4258: 4235: 4216: 4199: 4174: 4129: 4105: 4101: 4086: 4071: 4054: 4037: 4020: 3989: 3971: 3954: 3937: 3920: 3908: 3904: 3891: 3871: 3855: 3828: 3811: 3788: 3771: 3754: 3737: 3720: 3697: 3682: 3678: 3665: 3648: 3619: 3596: 3578: 3570: 3561: 3542: 3528: 3522: 3507: 3490: 3473: 3456: 3439: 3415: 3386: 3361: 3340: 3317: 3300: 3286: 3267: 3247: 3225: 3215:. My experience with Colin related to requested moves has been largely (if not entirely) positive. 3207: 3188: 3171: 3154: 3141: 3137: 3124: 3106: 3089: 3072: 3068: 3055: 3041: 3024: 3012: 3008: 2995: 2978: 2961: 2944: 2924: 2906: 2885: 2864: 2833: 2817: 2795: 2778: 2762: 2746: 2735: 2712: 2695: 2678: 2663: 2646: 2638: 2629: 2616: 2595: 2576: 2570: 2551: 2534: 2511: 2486: 2469: 2455: 2451: 2438: 2407: 2382: 2361: 2340: 2331: 2315: 2297: 2266: 2248: 2232: 2218: 2193: 2176: 2155: 2130: 2126: 2116: 2099: 2069: 2052: 2035: 2023: 2017: 2001: 1980: 1963: 1946: 1929: 1912: 1895: 1867: 1853: 1836: 1819: 1798: 1780: 1763: 1747: 1726: 1703: 1686: 1679: 1660: 1653: 1630: 1607: 1578: 1561: 1529: 1518: 1501: 1474: 1451: 1433: 1413: 1395: 1391: 1108: 1094: 954: 939: 811: 722: 684: 662: 618: 587:

G6 redirects in the way of moves more as a useful convenience than an occasionally necessary tool?

484: 227:

with the help of some great reviewers. Aside from my content creation, I think my participation in

213: 180: 179:

I'm most proud of my content creation work. My first big project on Knowledge (XXG) was working on

130: 112: 91: 87: 58: 2842: 2121:

Thoroughly enjoyed reading your articles on historical photographers and publications! Good luck.

406: 4913: 4763: 4665: 4360: 4145: 4084: 3803: 3629: 3590: 3434: 3396: 3357: 3327: 3282: 3235: 3180: 2986:

Checks all the boxes, don't see any issues. The userbox comments seem like a complete non-issue.

2969:, we need more administrators, although you'll have to get involved in conduct stuff eventually. 2902: 2743:- I trust they will make a good admin, and I am also satisfied with their answer to my question. 2725: 2311: 1863: 1617: 970: 672: 196: 1131: 550: 1771:. User is level-headed, has good answers to the questions, and shows exceptional competency. — 5185: 5029: 4978: 4942: 4927: 4745: 4693: 4571: 4399: 4287: 4225: 4164: 3886: 3867: 3712: 3691: 3674: 3661: 3374: 3216: 3167: 3098: 3085: 3050: 2970: 2957: 2708: 2672: 2621: 2612: 2185: 1972: 1955: 1942: 1908: 1876: 1776: 1739: 1552: 1172: 1104: 499: 467: 126: 73: 3349: 745: 602: 558: 436:

Have any of your RM closures been challenged? If so, how did you deal with those challenges?

306: 293: 5233: 5217: 5148: 5054: 4996: 4800: 4678: 4634: 4583: 4510: 4342: 4304: 4253: 4212: 4046: 4033: 3780: 3767: 3557: 3540: 3465: 3309: 3149: 3116: 2878: 2787: 2655: 2585: 2547: 2530: 2478: 2424: 2203: 1849: 1807: 1570: 1468: 1444: 678: 5168: 3945:— I respect the neutrality on the difficult subjects. I see no reason not to vote support. 2542:

I've not encountered Colin before but two good noms, some thoughtful answers, ... why not?

2163:: impressed, in particular, with their ability to politely handle contentious discussions. 1001: 928: 907: 736: 732: 554: 523: 443: 386: 382: 377: 373: 160: 4941:

on Knowledge (XXG). Still, at the end of the day, I find myself sufficiently reassured by

4897: 4776: 4692:

I'm a bit late to the game here, but I don't see any reason not to support - seems solid.

4606: 4525: 4413: 4194: 3929: 3846: 3729: 3033: 2987: 2916: 2846: 2811: 2687: 2262: 2242: 2141: 2112: 2078: 1546: 1526: 1404: 805: 769:

tasks such as welcoming new editors, or even offering advice on areas which you excel in?

714: 700: 357: 103: 4524:

I don’t know Colin M at all but they have good nominations and what I see is positive. --

3369:

This user has contributed significantly in the LGBT+ space which I watch. One example is

2607:, I have noticed Colin is a great communicator, which is a crucial skill for an admin. — 598: 228: 224: 184: 155: 3836:

per noms and Bluerasberry. I find no reason to oppose, good work, collaborative, etc.

2897:

I am sold on the candidate. I hope he will not find the admin tools quite as misshapen.

349:

Yes, this was absolutely an oversight which I've just fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.

296:

being among the keystones. But I guess one policy I would call out as an unsung hero is

5247: 5124: 5110: 4871: 4856: 4482: 4317: 3917: 3900: 3611: 3517: 3257: 3133: 3064: 3004: 2936: 2828: 2771: 2565: 2447: 2399: 2370: 2357: 2122: 1925: 1673: 1639: 1542: 1387: 1122: 1063:

accountability. That said, I think the ostensible purpose of the UCoC is noble. I care

1013: 760: 340: 83: 54: 4243:. This one goes in the category of "thought he already was one", and for a long time. 2494:. Have had a few encounters with ColinM and they've all been good. Also, agree with 741: 522:

makes some compelling points about how well-meaning attempts to clean up (rather than

289: 5286: 5172: 4909: 4816: 4759: 4661: 4079: 3794: 3585: 3424: 3353: 3276: 3021: 2898: 2721: 2349: 2335: 2307: 2228: 1859: 1789: 1718: 1425: 923: 902:

that I quoted immediately before. But, that exact quoted wording no longer exists in

876: 844: 794: 574: 534: 274: 3049:. We need more active admins on this site and they are a perfect candidate for one. 1971:

seems to have a clue, has some good content to their name, great noms whom I trust.

420:

strikes me as a reasonable and straightforward process I would be willing to follow.

5177: 5025: 4970: 4923: 4741: 4563: 4394: 4283: 4001: 3881: 3863: 3707: 3657: 3464:- looks like a solid candidate who is hard-working, level-headed, and trustworthy. 3163: 3081: 2953: 2704: 2608: 2011: 1938: 1904: 1772: 1538: 1514: 1459:: I trust the nominators, and I particularly appreciate the content creation work. 1168: 1100: 903: 899: 884: 880: 865: 249: 122: 69: 5230:

I wouldn't write it off quite yet. I think the long term trend is still present.

1363: 2559:, a fine content creator who has a number of GAs to his credit; clearly meets my 5144: 5100: 4992: 4875: 4867: 4796: 4627: 4500: 4300: 4267: 4244: 4208: 4029: 3779:

very good content creation and hard work at RM which will be helped by the mop,

3763: 3551: 3537: 3146: 2873: 2543: 2523: 2497: 2420: 1845: 1460: 1130:

This nomination refers to your interest in article titles. The advice given in

1079:

has more, indicating that it's American slang, perhaps derived from the Italian

1072: 981: 329:

as you seem especially interested in this topic. I notice that it still has an

1711:

Haven't seen anything objectionable from Colin, so I don't have any concerns. –

4601: 4186: 3837: 2804: 2257: 2108: 1599: 798: 784: 689: 5267:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

4879: 4715: 3606: 3348:- per the noms, and my interactions with Colin M, who appears to clearly be 2932: 2894: 2825: 2604: 2392: 2369:

I'm positive the candidate will handle the admin duties well if successful.

2353: 1921: 1827:

no concerns from me, and I respect the nominators and their faith in Colin.

1509:

per noms. Also good to see someone with an edit count of less than 10k run.

1081: 428: 326: 204: 192: 4945:, whose judgment I trust, via his support vote above. Moving to support. — 3705:

I thought the answers to the questions to be well thought out. Good Luck!

4812: 1713: 1419: 852:

Thank you for volunteering - I reviewed your comments in the August 2021

4117:), but have confidence in him already from reading his answers above. – 3728:- Seems like a trustworthy and skilled candidate. They have my support! 1076: 953:

You're not blind, I just don't have them listed anywhere. But they are:

514:

Undisclosed paid editing is antithetical to the first and second of the

1510: 543:

the role of admins at RM being different from the role of page movers?

4562:

No concerns at all. My few run ins with them have been very positive.

910:). I'm going to delete that paragraph since it's not very cogent (but 5277:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

2289: 1569:- friendly, good work, and knows when to ask for an outside opinion. 488: 200: 1071:

Your usage "skeeve out" was unfamiliar so I had to look it up. The

1251:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 4062:

I thought the answer to question 20 in particular was a good one.

1258: 4467:

Candidate passes all reasonable expectations with flying colors.

996:

Assuming that's true, I would find it troubling. Edit count is a

879:. Can you please answer your own question, with reference to the 4758:

feeling that this user will be a cogent and level-headed admin.

4619:, I randomly checked some contributions, everything seems fine. 3115:

Colin does on userboxes, and believe they have the right of it.

2226:~ joining the crowd for many of the reasons above. Happy days ~ 854:

RfC on non-notable pre-transition names of deceased trans people

211:). I've had the pleasure of bringing a handful of them, such as 5135:

material for measuring experience. For the record I could have

2686:, seems a reasonable person and a good candidate, no concerns. 1482:: I remember the candidate from his exchange with Persicifolia 1262: 343:

invested in this issue. Is this an oversight or what, please?

173:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

1418:

Not familiar with the candidate, but I trust the nominators.

119:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

4866:

comments. The argument is, roughly, equating expressions of

4165: 3080:. Very good editing track record, no issues I can identify. 1988:: Seems to have experience with Knowledge (XXG) procedures. 1441:

A good candidate who will make an excellent administrator.

4376:

I am confident Colin will make an excellent administrator.

597:

and my observation of closes performed by admins, is that

381:

if I were to start doing closures in other venues such as

1755:, no concern at this time and good answers to questions. 858:

Full birth name in lead sentence of biographical articles

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

231:

over the years has been a positive force in the project.

5021: 4863: 4860: 2416: 1216: 1210: 1204: 593:

Great question. My impression, based on the wording of

459:, which seemed to be enough to satisfy their concerns. 5169:

Grand Poobah Orichalcum Unobtainium Silver Star Medal

148:

Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?

5167:

It has often made me wonder what the point of the "

1351: 1315: 1294: 248:is that sometimes it's best to just walk away from 2306:, per nominators and good answers to questions. – 1596:everything's made up and the criteria don't matter 883:guideline and any other relevant policy: why does 824:, this position was part of the documentation for 5175:is less of a syndrome at RFA than it used to be. 5078:I can't recall coming across this editor before. 5040:I'm not going to stop you. You do what you want. 2703:Level-headed. (Figuratively, probably.) Rgrds. -- 2352:, good record with RM closures and Move Reviews. 1903:not seeing any reasons for sitting on the fence. 549:RM/MRV regulars are generally quite accepting of 442:I have not had any closes formally challenged at 260:You may ask optional questions below. There is a 2278:One would have thought he was already an admin. 4660:, Looks like this would be an effective admin. 3275:, consistently civil, thoughtful, and helpful. 670:I have written a few short stubs, for example: 5057:, you decide how you want to vote. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 4450:per what I wrote below (moved from neutral) — 4045:— The user seems to be a good administrator. 3498:- experienced, level-headed, and articulate. 1274: 610:and hearing the views of experienced closers. 8: 4859:userbox some months ago in which Colin made 1235:Edit summary usage for Colin M can be found 4299:Nothing I can see as a basis for opposing. 793:Talk Page. I went ahead and added a TP for 53:Final: (178/0/3) - Closed as successful by 5127:—Exactly. Colin M's response describes it 2060:due to Colin’s expertise in XfDs and CRs. 1281: 1267: 1259: 929:our policy on biographies of living people 649:Thanks for volunteering. I have seen your 5216:Just an additional "+1" to BK49's point 4939:treating them as though they're the same 4429:No issues, has a clue and isn't a jerk. 2184:. Excellent judgment in RM discussions. 1486:on the expression "wheelchair-bound" on 1247:Please keep discussion constructive and 1075:is brief: "to disgust or repulse". The 748:article of non-trivial size. If someone 3447:, don't see anything to cause concern. 2786:No concerns, would handle a mop well. - 595:the requested move closing instructions 5201: 5104: 5059:2601:647:5800:1A1F:8CB5:E48C:369D:2C3E 3233:will be a net-positive to the project. 1592:the most controversial admin criteria. 869: 154:Mostly because it would help me close 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 3604:per nom. A very competent candidate. 2803:- has all the makings of a good 'un. 2770:– Communicative and sensible enough. 2138:. Excellent content contributions. — 1806:due to general need for more admins. 1586:per noms. For what it's worth, Colin 7: 5200:of that kind of service award being 4906:Special:PermaLink/1081567265#Neutral 4498:Balanced, dedicated, mature editor. 1144:our policy on natural disambiguation 5024:seem to be how they roll. Rgrds. -- 2952:, per review and I trust Diannaa. 1875:, good contributor and no issues. 24: 5293:Successful requests for adminship 5196:Ironically, I could also see the 3481:- Why not, he seems trustworthy. 2390:- per nomination statements. -- 551:closure by experienced non-admins 5007:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4896: 3673:I see no reason not to support. 2009:Experienced user, has my trust. 1738:and with clue in interactions -- 1484:half-way through this discussion 1044:What's your position on the new 856:as well as your comments in the 207:(somehow my most viewed article 4775:per answers and past record. -- 2417:our horrible and broken process 1937:. No issues, deserves the mop. 516:five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 4412:for the same reason as above. 875:as part of your discussion of 409:? If so, under what criteria? 187:. Since I began working on it 1: 5202:fodder against someone at RFA 4904:Pointless bickering removed. 4600:problematic editing. Regards 2654:. Fully qualified candidate. 1598:, so he will do just fine. -- 870:Why aren't we applying it to 307:here to build an encyclopedia 3916:. Good candidate. Good luck! 990:community about this issue? 868:as a "great policy" and ask 418:User:Firsfron/Accountability 3352:to build the encyclopedia. 2519:As co-nom, no issues here. 485:Magellan expedition § Notes 137:Questions for the candidate 5309: 2274:Good head on his shoulders 959:Wormwood: A Drama of Paris 860:section of your userspace 451:related to consensus like 220:Wormwood: A Drama of Paris 5256:15:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 5241:07:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 5226:15:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 5192:16:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 5163:15:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 5119:15:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 5088:20:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 5067:22:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 5050:20:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 5034:09:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 5017:19:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 5001:19:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 4985:18:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 4955:19:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4932:21:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 4918:07:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4892:16:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 4821:03:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC) 4805:23:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4788:21:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4768:21:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4750:20:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4732:18:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4707:16:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4685:16:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4670:16:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4653:15:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4637:11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4612:09:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4592:01:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4575:01:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4558:00:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 4534:23:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4517:22:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4491:21:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4474:19:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4460:19:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4443:18:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4422:16:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4405:15:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4386:14:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4369:13:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4352:13:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4333:11:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4309:09:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4292:07:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4275:05:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4259:03:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4236:03:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4217:02:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4200:01:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC) 4175:23:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4130:20:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4106:19:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4087:18:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4072:17:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4055:15:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4038:15:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 4021:14:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3990:14:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3972:13:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3955:12:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3938:09:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3921:07:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3909:06:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3892:05:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3872:04:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3856:02:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3829:01:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3812:00:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 3789:22:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3772:19:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3755:19:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3738:18:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3721:18:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3698:17:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3683:17:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3666:16:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3649:14:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3620:11:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3597:10:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3579:08:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3562:07:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3543:07:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3529:05:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3508:03:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3491:01:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3474:01:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3457:00:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3440:00:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3416:17:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3387:17:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3362:16:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3341:16:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3318:16:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3301:16:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3287:16:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3268:15:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3248:14:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3226:14:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3208:14:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3189:14:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3179:Approved for 15 years. - 3172:13:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3155:12:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3142:12:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3125:11:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3107:11:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3090:10:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3073:08:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3056:04:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 3042:04:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3025:03:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 3013:01:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 2996:01:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 2979:00:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 2962:00:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 2945:00:14, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 2925:23:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2907:23:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2886:22:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2865:22:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2834:22:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2818:22:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2796:21:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2779:21:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2763:21:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2736:21:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2713:21:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2696:21:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2679:21:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2664:20:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2647:20:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2630:19:27, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2617:19:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2596:19:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2577:19:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2552:17:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2535:16:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2512:16:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2487:15:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2470:15:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2456:15:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2439:14:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2408:11:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2383:10:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2362:10:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2341:08:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2316:08:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2298:07:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2267:06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2249:05:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2233:05:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2219:04:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2194:04:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2177:04:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2156:03:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2131:03:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2117:03:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2100:02:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2070:02:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2053:01:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2036:01:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2018:00:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 2002:00:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 1981:23:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1964:23:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1947:23:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1930:23:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1913:22:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1896:22:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1868:21:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1854:21:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1837:21:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1820:20:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1799:20:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1781:20:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1764:20:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1748:18:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1727:18:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1704:17:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1687:17:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1661:17:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1631:17:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1608:17:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1579:17:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1562:17:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1530:16:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1519:16:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1502:16:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1475:15:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1452:15:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1434:15:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1414:14:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1396:14:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 1109:17:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 1095:08:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 1046:Universal Code of Conduct 812:18:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 723:10:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 663:01:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 378:sockpuppet investigations 131:04:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 113:14:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC) 92:14:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC) 59:13:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC) 5270:Please do not modify it. 4714:No qualms. He's got the 4115:somebody else's userpage 3132:thanks for volunteering 2893:. Having now read up on 1858:Trustworthy, competent. 967:The Chameleon (magazine) 197:19th century periodicals 5080:Emir of Knowledge (XXG) 3500:Iamreallygoodatcheckers 1121:Optional question from 1035:Optional question from 1012:Optional question from 980:Optional question from 938:Optional question from 887:not currently apply to 843:Optional question from 783:Optional question from 759:Optional question from 699:Optional question from 640:Optional question from 617:Optional question from 573:Optional question from 533:Optional question from 520:"Buy one, get one free" 498:Optional question from 466:Optional question from 427:Optional question from 396:Optional question from 356:Optional question from 316:Optional question from 273:Optional question from 38:Please do not modify it 4340:, without hesitation. 2720:probable net positive 2240:Will be a good admin. 2045:Pharaoh of the Wizards 1060:enforcement guidelines 446:. I can think of only 302:anyone on the internet 4393:I don't see why not. 3449:ScottishFinnishRadish 2563:. No other concerns. 1990:I.hate.spam.mail.here 963:Sunshine & Health 864:, where you describe 185:level-4 vital article 34:request for adminship 4378:Trainsandotherthings 4182:. Looks good to me! 2671:- no real concerns. 1364:Global contributions 1022:wp:ANI discussions? 508:unethical practice? 250:a low-stakes dispute 5131:—edit counts are a 4908:for previous text. 4718:, now give him the 4582:per above editors-- 3627:No obvious issues. 2748:Comr Melody Idoghor 2165:Firefangledfeathers 1977:click to talk to me 1844:, good work at RM. 1328:Non-automated edits 1166:Links for Colin M: 955:The Hobby Directory 922:question is, well, 822:until very recently 685:CBC Wednesday Night 214:The Hobby Directory 181:Magellan expedition 4064:Royal Autumn Crest 3964:CactiStaccingCrane 3821:Paradise Chronicle 3747:Extraordinary Writ 3394:per nominators. -- 2603:Main reason: Like 2504:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz 2162: 1696:Crystallizedcarbon 1307:Edit summary usage 1255:before commenting. 971:The News (musical) 912:here's a permalink 673:The Quartier Latin 655:Paradise Chronicle 642:Paradise Chronicle 39: 5189: 5159: 5152: 5103:writes (in part) 4982: 4626: 4331: 4324: 4321: 4207:no reason not to 4198: 4144:comment added by 3716: 3656:Has my trust. -- 3560: 3243: 2831: 2808: 2777: 2594: 2435: 2428: 2300: 2160: 2153: 1493:Fowler&fowler 1377: 1376: 1253:his contributions 802: 563:post-move cleanup 325:I just looked at 37: 5300: 5272: 5238: 5236: 5208: 5183: 5157: 5150: 5094:General comments 5013: 4976: 4952: 4950: 4902:Bureaucrat note: 4900: 4889: 4887: 4785: 4779: 4699: 4696: 4649: 4632: 4624: 4620: 4609: 4604: 4555: 4550: 4545: 4515: 4513: 4508: 4503: 4471: 4457: 4455: 4402: 4397: 4350: 4325: 4322: 4320: 4272: 4251: 4233: 4228: 4192: 4191: 4172: 4171: 4168: 4157: 4125: 4082: 4019: 4010: 3884: 3842: 3800: 3797: 3719: 3717: 3714: 3644: 3638: 3632: 3593: 3588: 3556: 3525: 3520: 3483:IsaacAndHisIsaac 3437: 3432: 3411: 3405: 3402: 3399: 3384: 3379: 3337: 3330: 3299: 3279: 3246: 3241: 3238: 3223: 3205: 3200: 3053: 3052:`~HelpingWorld~` 3020:per nominators. 2881: 2860: 2851: 2829: 2809: 2806: 2776: 2774: 2760: 2749: 2590: 2588: 2575: 2573: 2568: 2528: 2527: 2501: 2468: 2446:- trusted user. 2433: 2426: 2404: 2403: 2397: 2396: 2380: 2377: 2296: 2292: 2284: 2260: 2247: 2217: 2213: 2208: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2098: 2096: 2088: 2087: 2014: 1954:per nominators ~ 1885: 1884: 1796: 1725: 1716: 1685: 1682: 1676: 1657: 1650: 1643: 1627: 1622: 1620: 1605: 1499: 1494: 1471: 1465: 1449: 1447: 1422: 1323:Articles created 1283: 1276: 1269: 1260: 1240: 1232: 1191: 1073:Wiktionary entry 831: 803: 800: 679:Starvation Blues 339:despite all the 338: 332: 269: 5308: 5307: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5275:this nomination 5268: 5234: 5232: 5206: 5099:In question 20 5096: 5011: 4948: 4946: 4885: 4883: 4841: 4829: 4783: 4777: 4704: 4697: 4694: 4679:Peter Southwood 4647: 4644:, locking good. 4628: 4625: 4622: 4607: 4602: 4553: 4548: 4543: 4511: 4506: 4501: 4499: 4469: 4453: 4451: 4400: 4395: 4341: 4330: 4282:. No concerns. 4268: 4266:. No concerns. 4245: 4231: 4226: 4183: 4169: 4166: 4139: 4123: 4080: 4017: 4011: 4008: 3998: 3947:Hey man im josh 3882: 3854: 3838: 3798: 3795: 3762:per NOBIGDEAL. 3713: 3706: 3690:per NOBIGDEAL. 3642: 3636: 3630: 3591: 3586: 3583:Happy Editing-- 3553:Charles Stewart 3523: 3518: 3435: 3425: 3409: 3403: 3400: 3397: 3382: 3375: 3335: 3328: 3295: 3277: 3266: 3237:« Gonzo fan2007 3236: 3234: 3217: 3203: 3199:Nova Crystallis 3198: 3152: 3151:it has begun... 3051: 2879: 2858: 2849: 2830:◊distænt write◊ 2805: 2772: 2754: 2747: 2586: 2571: 2566: 2564: 2521: 2520: 2495: 2461: 2401: 2400: 2394: 2393: 2378: 2371: 2350:my RFA criteria 2290: 2282: 2258: 2241: 2209: 2204: 2202: 2201:. No problems. 2149: 2142: 2092: 2090: 2083: 2079: 2062:NotReallySoroka 2012: 1882: 1877: 1829:RickinBaltimore 1795: 1790: 1761:Please ping me! 1757:A. C. Santacruz 1714: 1712: 1680: 1674: 1669: 1655: 1648: 1641: 1625: 1618: 1616: 1600: 1497: 1492: 1469: 1461: 1445: 1443: 1420: 1383: 1378: 1373: 1347: 1311: 1290: 1289:RfA/RfB toolbox 1287: 1236: 1184: 1167: 1163: 1148:This recent RfC 825: 799: 453:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY 398:A. C. Santacruz 336: 330: 259: 229:requested moves 159:had a sizeable 139: 99: 67: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5306: 5304: 5296: 5295: 5285: 5284: 5280: 5279: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5228: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5095: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5042:Scorpions13256 5038: 5037: 5036: 4987: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4958: 4957: 4949:Rhododendrites 4934: 4920: 4886:Rhododendrites 4872:straight pride 4857:straight pride 4840: 4837: 4835: 4833: 4832: 4828: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4807: 4790: 4770: 4752: 4734: 4724:Martinevans123 4709: 4702: 4687: 4672: 4655: 4639: 4621: 4614: 4594: 4577: 4560: 4536: 4519: 4493: 4476: 4470:casualdejekyll 4462: 4454:Rhododendrites 4445: 4431:RandomCanadian 4424: 4407: 4388: 4371: 4354: 4335: 4326: 4311: 4294: 4277: 4261: 4238: 4219: 4202: 4177: 4158: 4132: 4108: 4089: 4074: 4057: 4040: 4023: 4013: 4006: 3992: 3974: 3957: 3940: 3923: 3911: 3894: 3874: 3858: 3844: 3831: 3814: 3791: 3774: 3757: 3740: 3723: 3700: 3685: 3668: 3651: 3622: 3599: 3581: 3571:Kavyansh.Singh 3564: 3545: 3531: 3510: 3493: 3476: 3459: 3442: 3418: 3389: 3364: 3343: 3320: 3303: 3289: 3270: 3262: 3250: 3228: 3210: 3196:Net positive. 3191: 3174: 3157: 3150: 3144: 3127: 3109: 3092: 3075: 3058: 3044: 3027: 3015: 2998: 2981: 2964: 2947: 2927: 2909: 2888: 2867: 2836: 2820: 2798: 2781: 2765: 2738: 2715: 2698: 2681: 2666: 2649: 2639:Scorpions13256 2632: 2619: 2598: 2579: 2554: 2537: 2514: 2489: 2472: 2458: 2441: 2410: 2385: 2364: 2343: 2318: 2301: 2283:P.I. Ellsworth 2269: 2251: 2235: 2221: 2196: 2179: 2158: 2133: 2119: 2102: 2072: 2055: 2038: 2024:John M Wolfson 2020: 2004: 1983: 1966: 1949: 1932: 1915: 1898: 1870: 1856: 1839: 1822: 1801: 1791: 1783: 1766: 1750: 1729: 1706: 1689: 1663: 1633: 1610: 1581: 1564: 1532: 1521: 1504: 1477: 1454: 1436: 1416: 1398: 1382: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1372: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1346: 1345: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1319: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1304: 1298: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1285: 1278: 1271: 1263: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1233: 1162: 1159: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1125: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1056: 1039: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1016: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 984: 977: 976: 975: 974: 942: 940:Reaper Eternal 935: 934: 933: 932: 916: 847: 840: 839: 838: 837: 787: 780: 779: 778: 777: 763: 756: 755: 754: 753: 710:AfD Stats Tool 703: 696: 695: 694: 693: 644: 637: 636: 635: 634: 621: 619:Idoghor Melody 614: 613: 612: 611: 577: 570: 569: 568: 567: 537: 530: 529: 528: 527: 502: 495: 494: 493: 492: 489:Ah Men § Notes 470: 463: 462: 461: 460: 431: 424: 423: 422: 421: 407:open to recall 400: 393: 392: 391: 390: 360: 353: 352: 351: 350: 320: 313: 312: 311: 310: 277: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 235: 234: 233: 232: 167: 166: 165: 164: 156:requested move 138: 135: 134: 133: 98: 95: 66: 63: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5305: 5294: 5291: 5290: 5288: 5278: 5276: 5271: 5265: 5264: 5257: 5253: 5249: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5239: 5237: 5229: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5209: 5203: 5199: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5190: 5187: 5180: 5179: 5174: 5173:editcountitis 5170: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5160: 5153: 5146: 5142: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5121: 5120: 5116: 5112: 5107: 5102: 5098: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5081: 5077: 5074: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5014: 5008: 5004: 5003: 5002: 4998: 4994: 4991: 4988: 4986: 4983: 4980: 4973: 4972: 4967: 4964: 4963: 4956: 4951: 4944: 4940: 4935: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4888: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4865: 4862: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4849: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4838: 4836: 4831: 4830: 4826: 4822: 4818: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4806: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4791: 4789: 4786: 4780: 4774: 4771: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4756: 4753: 4751: 4747: 4743: 4738: 4735: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4710: 4708: 4705: 4700: 4691: 4688: 4686: 4682: 4680: 4676: 4673: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4656: 4654: 4651: 4650: 4643: 4640: 4638: 4635: 4633: 4631: 4618: 4615: 4613: 4610: 4605: 4598: 4595: 4593: 4589: 4585: 4581: 4578: 4576: 4573: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4561: 4559: 4556: 4551: 4546: 4540: 4537: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4520: 4518: 4514: 4509: 4504: 4497: 4494: 4492: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4477: 4475: 4472: 4466: 4463: 4461: 4456: 4449: 4446: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4425: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4408: 4406: 4403: 4398: 4392: 4389: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4372: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4361:Pawnkingthree 4358: 4355: 4353: 4348: 4344: 4339: 4336: 4334: 4329: 4319: 4316:Good editor. 4315: 4312: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4295: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4278: 4276: 4273: 4271: 4265: 4262: 4260: 4257: 4256: 4252: 4250: 4249: 4242: 4239: 4237: 4234: 4229: 4223: 4220: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4196: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4181: 4178: 4176: 4173: 4162: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4146:Djm-leighpark 4143: 4136: 4133: 4131: 4128: 4126: 4120: 4116: 4112: 4109: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4098: 4093: 4090: 4088: 4085: 4083: 4078: 4075: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4058: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4041: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4024: 4022: 4016: 4004: 4003: 3996: 3993: 3991: 3988: 3985: 3982: 3978: 3975: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3958: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3941: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3924: 3922: 3919: 3915: 3912: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3895: 3893: 3890: 3889: 3887: 3885: 3878: 3875: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3862: 3859: 3857: 3852: 3848: 3843: 3841: 3835: 3832: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3792: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3775: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3758: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3741: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3724: 3722: 3718: 3711: 3710: 3704: 3701: 3699: 3696: 3693: 3689: 3686: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3669: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3652: 3650: 3647: 3646: 3639: 3633: 3626: 3623: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3603: 3600: 3598: 3595: 3594: 3589: 3582: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3565: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3549: 3546: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3535: 3532: 3530: 3527: 3526: 3521: 3514: 3511: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3494: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3477: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3443: 3441: 3438: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3422: 3419: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3406: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3385: 3380: 3378: 3377:Bluerasberry 3372: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3344: 3342: 3338: 3332: 3331: 3329:Crouch, Swale 3324: 3321: 3319: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3298: 3297:North America 3293: 3290: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3274: 3271: 3269: 3265: 3260: 3259: 3255:- no issues. 3254: 3251: 3249: 3244: 3239: 3232: 3229: 3227: 3224: 3222: 3221: 3214: 3211: 3209: 3206: 3201: 3195: 3192: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181:CafeGurrier66 3178: 3175: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3113: 3110: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3054: 3048: 3045: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3028: 3026: 3023: 3019: 3016: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2999: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2982: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2965: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2889: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2875: 2871: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2844: 2840: 2837: 2835: 2832: 2827: 2824: 2821: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2802: 2799: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2782: 2780: 2775: 2769: 2766: 2764: 2761: 2759: 2758: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2716: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2599: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2562: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2532: 2526: 2525: 2518: 2515: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2502:'s comments. 2499: 2493: 2490: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2459: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2436: 2429: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2411: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2398: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2376: 2375: 2368: 2365: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2328: 2327: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2295: 2293: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2277: 2273: 2270: 2268: 2265: 2263: 2261: 2255: 2252: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2225: 2222: 2220: 2216: 2214: 2212: 2207: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2180: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2159: 2157: 2154: 2152: 2146: 2145: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2097: 2095: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2043:net positive. 2042: 2039: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2008: 2005: 2003: 1999: 1998:contributions 1995: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1967: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1899: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1881: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1787: 1784: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1767: 1765: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1724: 1722: 1717: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1683: 1677: 1667: 1664: 1662: 1659: 1658: 1652: 1651: 1645: 1644: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1628: 1621: 1619:Victor Trevor 1614: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1527:🐶 EpicPupper 1525: 1522: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1495: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1464: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1408: 1407: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1354: 1350: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1318: 1314: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1297: 1293: 1284: 1279: 1277: 1272: 1270: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1254: 1250: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1158: 1149: 1145: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1083: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1034: 1033: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1003: 999: 995: 992: 991: 988: 985: 983: 979: 978: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 949: 948: 946: 943: 941: 937: 936: 930: 925: 924:MOS:BIRTHNAME 921: 917: 915:MOS:DEADNAME. 913: 909: 905: 901: 896: 893: 892: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877:MOS:BIRTHNAME 874: 873: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 848: 846: 842: 841: 835: 829: 823: 818: 815: 814: 813: 810: 807: 804: 796: 795:Beauty filter 791: 788: 786: 782: 781: 774: 771: 770: 767: 764: 762: 758: 757: 751: 747: 743: 738: 734: 729: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 711: 707: 704: 702: 698: 697: 691: 687: 686: 681: 680: 675: 674: 669: 666: 665: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 645: 643: 639: 638: 631: 628: 627: 625: 622: 620: 616: 615: 609: 604: 600: 596: 592: 589: 588: 586: 581: 578: 576: 572: 571: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 545: 544: 541: 538: 536: 532: 531: 525: 521: 517: 513: 510: 509: 506: 503: 501: 497: 496: 490: 486: 481: 478: 477: 474: 471: 469: 465: 464: 458: 454: 449: 445: 441: 438: 437: 435: 432: 430: 426: 425: 419: 414: 411: 410: 408: 405:Would you be 404: 401: 399: 395: 394: 388: 384: 379: 375: 371: 368: 367: 364: 361: 359: 355: 354: 348: 345: 344: 342: 341:recent effort 335: 328: 324: 321: 319: 315: 314: 308: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290:verifiability 287: 284: 283: 281: 278: 276: 272: 271: 270: 267: 266:two questions 263: 251: 246: 243: 242: 240: 237: 236: 230: 226: 222: 221: 216: 215: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 175: 174: 172: 169: 168: 162: 157: 153: 150: 149: 147: 144: 143: 142: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 117: 116: 115: 114: 111: 109: 107: 106: 97:Co-nomination 96: 94: 93: 89: 85: 81: 78: 75: 71: 64: 62: 61: 60: 56: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 5269: 5266: 5231: 5197: 5182: 5176: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5075: 4989: 4975: 4969: 4965: 4943:Bluerasberry 4938: 4901: 4847: 4846: 4834: 4809: 4792: 4772: 4754: 4736: 4711: 4689: 4674: 4657: 4645: 4641: 4629: 4616: 4596: 4579: 4566: 4565: 4538: 4521: 4495: 4481:Seems fine. 4478: 4464: 4447: 4426: 4409: 4390: 4373: 4356: 4337: 4313: 4296: 4279: 4269: 4263: 4254: 4247: 4246: 4240: 4221: 4204: 4185: 4184: 4179: 4160: 4140:— Preceding 4134: 4122: 4110: 4096: 4095: 4091: 4076: 4059: 4042: 4025: 4000: 3994: 3976: 3959: 3942: 3925: 3913: 3896: 3879: 3876: 3860: 3839: 3833: 3816: 3776: 3759: 3742: 3725: 3708: 3702: 3687: 3670: 3653: 3628: 3624: 3616:see my edits 3605: 3601: 3584: 3566: 3552: 3547: 3533: 3516: 3512: 3495: 3478: 3461: 3444: 3427: 3426: 3420: 3395: 3391: 3376: 3366: 3345: 3326: 3322: 3312: 3311: 3305: 3291: 3272: 3256: 3252: 3230: 3219: 3218: 3212: 3193: 3176: 3159: 3129: 3111: 3099:No such user 3094: 3077: 3060: 3046: 3029: 3017: 3000: 2983: 2971:Secretlondon 2966: 2949: 2929: 2911: 2890: 2877: 2869: 2857: 2856: 2848: 2847: 2843:net positive 2838: 2822: 2800: 2783: 2767: 2756: 2755: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2728: 2717: 2700: 2683: 2668: 2651: 2634: 2622:Stroopwafels 2600: 2581: 2556: 2539: 2522: 2516: 2491: 2474: 2465:TREY MATURIN 2462: 2443: 2412: 2391: 2387: 2373: 2372: 2366: 2345: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2303: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2253: 2243: 2237: 2227: 2223: 2210: 2205: 2198: 2186:Adumbrativus 2181: 2140: 2139: 2135: 2104: 2093: 2084: 2080: 2074: 2057: 2040: 2010: 2006: 1985: 1973:Peacemaker67 1968: 1951: 1934: 1917: 1900: 1879: 1872: 1841: 1824: 1803: 1792: 1785: 1768: 1752: 1740:Gerda Arendt 1731: 1720: 1708: 1691: 1665: 1654: 1647: 1640: 1635: 1612: 1601: 1587: 1583: 1566: 1553:Celestina007 1551: 1534: 1523: 1506: 1479: 1462: 1456: 1442: 1438: 1405: 1400: 1246: 1245: 1225: 1219: 1213: 1207: 1201: 1195: 1188: 1181: 1175: 1156: 1138: 1127: 1080: 1064: 1051: 1041: 1025: 1018: 997: 993: 986: 950: 944: 919: 904:MOS:DEADNAME 900:MOS:DEADNAME 894: 888: 885:MOS:DEADNAME 881:MOS:DEADNAME 871: 866:MOS:DEADNAME 849: 816: 789: 772: 765: 749: 727: 705: 683: 677: 671: 667: 646: 629: 623: 590: 584: 579: 546: 539: 511: 504: 500:Celestina007 479: 472: 468:Celestina007 439: 433: 412: 402: 369: 362: 346: 334:italic title 322: 301: 285: 279: 265: 258: 244: 238: 218: 212: 208: 201:LGBT history 176: 170: 151: 145: 140: 118: 104: 100: 76: 68: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 5235:scope_creep 5218:Nosebagbear 4876:black pride 4868:white pride 4778:Orange Mike 4720:Admin Tools 4584:Ozzie10aaaa 4483:EnPassant♟♙ 4224:No qualms. 4047:Drummingman 3918:— sparklism 3851:revolutions 3781:Atlantic306 3466:Nosferattus 3117:Nosebagbear 2788:Kj cheetham 2656:Newyorkbrad 2587:PerryPerryD 2531:drop a line 2479:Ad Orientem 1962:• she/her) 1808:Cooljeanius 1668:looks good 1615:Why not? -- 1446:scope_creep 1369:User rights 1359:CentralAuth 828:Talk header 444:move review 193:linguistics 5133:very noisy 4526:Malcolmxl5 4414:Epicgenius 4163:Why not? - 3930:Denisarona 3819:Go for it. 3802:(he/him · 3730:Netherzone 3637:Howl at me 3612:chat to me 3423:per above 3147:* Pppery * 3034:John Cline 2917:Goldsztajn 2688:Chocmilk03 2592:Talk To Me 2463:— THIS IS 2244:Crossroads 2143:Newslinger 2107:. Sure. // 1860:~ ToBeFree 1638:per noms. 1547:Ritchie333 1406:Ritchie333 1403:as co-nom 1352:Cross-wiki 1343:AfD closes 1161:Discussion 1048:, please? 908:due weight 742:verifiable 715:Goldsztajn 701:Goldsztajn 690:Bergantina 566:question.) 457:WP:DISCARD 358:Ganesha811 105:Ritchie333 65:Nomination 31:successful 5248:Barkeep49 5129:very well 5125:Barkeep49 5111:Barkeep49 4880:gay pride 4722:, I say. 4716:Cow Tools 4703:(blether) 4541:Why not? 4343:Vanamonde 4328:Contribs! 4119:Fayenatic 4097:North8000 3984:scientist 3901:MdsShakil 3258:Jauerback 3134:Vexations 3065:Neiltonks 3005:Blythwood 2895:Cow Tools 2773:Paul Erik 2722:Cas Liber 2567:GregJackP 2448:Thingofme 2123:DanCherek 1675:Ingenuity 1594:However, 1590:meet the 1543:Barkeep49 1388:Barkeep49 1338:AfD votes 1333:BLP edits 1211:block log 1123:RadioKAOS 1037:Andrew D. 1014:North8000 872:everyone? 834:e.g. here 761:Volten001 327:Cow Tools 318:Andrew D. 298:Consensus 205:Cow Tools 84:Barkeep49 55:Acalamari 5287:Category 5198:presence 5022:Neutrals 4910:Primefac 4813:Aoi (青い) 4760:Mdewman6 4662:Rollidan 4623:signed, 4439:contribs 4154:contribs 4142:unsigned 4081:Terasail 4015:contribs 3643:My hunts 3354:Beccaynr 3278:Rusalkii 2988:Chaddude 2941:contribs 2732:contribs 2561:criteria 2326:Svārtava 2308:Ammarpad 2272:Support. 2224:Support' 2173:contribs 2032:contribs 1816:contribs 1793:FitIndia 1736:precious 1709:Support. 1430:contribs 1386:As nom. 1316:Analysis 1295:Counters 1179:contribs 1132:WP:ATDAB 1082:schifare 889:everyone 845:Beccaynr 575:Mdewman6 535:Mdewman6 448:one case 275:LindsayH 223:, up to 203:, to... 80:contribs 5207:SN54129 5178:WaltCip 5158:ONTRIBS 5137:100,000 5076:Neutral 5026:Bison X 4990:Neutral 4971:WaltCip 4966:Neutral 4924:Colin M 4848:Neutral 4839:Neutral 4810:Support 4793:Support 4773:Support 4755:Support 4742:BusterD 4737:Support 4712:Support 4690:Support 4675:Support 4658:Support 4648:- Owais 4642:Support 4617:Support 4597:Support 4580:support 4539:Support 4522:Support 4496:Support 4479:Support 4465:Support 4448:Support 4427:Support 4410:Support 4396:SunDawn 4391:Support 4374:Support 4357:Support 4338:Support 4314:Support 4297:Support 4284:Maproom 4280:Support 4264:Support 4241:Support 4232:Lights! 4222:Support 4205:Support 4195:say hi! 4180:Support 4161:Support 4135:Support 4111:Support 4092:Support 4077:Support 4060:Support 4043:Support 4026:Support 4002:CX Zoom 3995:Support 3977:Support 3960:Support 3943:Support 3926:Support 3914:Support 3897:Support 3883:Asartea 3877:Support 3864:Leijurv 3861:Support 3847:spin me 3834:Support 3817:Support 3777:Support 3760:Support 3743:Support 3726:Support 3709:Aloha27 3703:Support 3695:Blaster 3688:Support 3671:Support 3658:Dolotta 3654:Support 3625:Support 3602:Support 3567:Support 3548:Support 3534:Support 3519:Schwede 3513:Support 3496:Support 3479:Support 3462:Support 3445:Support 3421:Support 3392:support 3367:Support 3346:Support 3323:Support 3310:Dreamy 3306:Support 3292:Support 3273:Support 3253:Support 3231:Support 3220:Calidum 3213:Support 3194:Support 3177:Support 3164:Loopy30 3160:Support 3130:Support 3112:Support 3095:Support 3082:Bibeyjj 3078:Support 3061:Support 3047:Support 3030:Support 3018:Support 3001:Support 2984:Support 2967:Support 2954:Kierzek 2950:Support 2930:Support 2912:Support 2891:Support 2870:Support 2839:Support 2823:Support 2801:Support 2784:Support 2768:Support 2741:Support 2718:Support 2705:Bison X 2701:Support 2684:Support 2676:Snowman 2669:Support 2652:Support 2635:Support 2609:Diannaa 2601:Support 2582:Support 2572:Boomer! 2557:Support 2540:Support 2517:Support 2492:Support 2475:Support 2444:Support 2434:ONTRIBS 2413:Support 2388:Support 2367:Support 2346:Support 2321:Support 2304:Support 2254:Support 2238:Support 2229:Lindsay 2199:Support 2182:Support 2161:Support 2136:Support 2105:Support 2075:Support 2058:Endorse 2041:Support 2013:Spencer 2007:Support 1986:Support 1969:Support 1952:Support 1939:Sea Cow 1935:Support 1918:Support 1905:Mccapra 1901:Support 1880:Gwennie 1873:Support 1842:Support 1825:Support 1804:Support 1786:Support 1773:Mhawk10 1769:Support 1753:Support 1732:Support 1692:Support 1666:Support 1636:Support 1613:Support 1584:Support 1567:Support 1539:Colin M 1535:Support 1524:Support 1507:Support 1480:Support 1457:Support 1439:Support 1401:Support 1381:Support 1186:deleted 1169:Colin M 1101:Colin M 862:soapbox 746:neutral 651:soapbox 559:WP:RFHM 189:in 2019 161:backlog 123:Colin M 70:Colin M 47:Colin M 5145:3PPYB6 5101:3PPYB6 5055:Toad40 5012:話して下さい 4993:Toad40 4855:for a 4827:Oppose 4797:Nick-D 4698:Summit 4630:511KeV 4572:(talk) 4544:Severe 4318:Viewer 4301:AryKun 4270:Ks0stm 4248:BD2412 4227:Purple 4209:SK2242 4170:ASTILY 4030:Gorpik 3764:Lkb335 3631:NW1223 3558:(talk) 3538:Kurtis 3436:(talk) 3431:iolite 3383:(talk) 3242:(talk) 3204:(Talk) 2899:Haukur 2874:Bilorv 2859:apolis 2841:for a 2757:(talk) 2544:Cabayi 2524:Augend 2498:3PPYB6 2421:3PPYB6 2402:(Talk) 2374:Volten 2211:Whales 2081:Formal 1846:Ruбlov 1545:& 1498:«Talk» 1488:WT:MOS 1463:Bsoyka 1302:XTools 1087:Andrew 982:3PPYB6 969:, and 733:WP:GNG 688:, and 555:WP:RMT 524:delete 387:WP:AFD 383:WP:FFD 374:WP:AIV 209:by far 5106:fail. 4874:with 4861:these 4695:Girth 4549:storm 4187:Chlod 4127:ondon 3840:78.26 3808:edits 3796:Dylan 3692:House 3645:: --> 3592:Chaos 3401:fried 3264:dude. 2807:Atsme 2673:Giant 2259:Kpddg 2109:Julle 1672:: --> 1671:: --> 1670:: --> 1571:Femke 1249:civil 1193:count 1065:a lot 801:Atsme 785:Atsme 608:WT:RM 557:, or 487:, or 385:, or 262:limit 199:, to 195:, to 16:< 5252:talk 5222:talk 5186:talk 5115:talk 5084:talk 5063:talk 5046:talk 5030:talk 4997:talk 4979:talk 4928:talk 4914:talk 4878:and 4870:and 4817:talk 4801:talk 4784:Talk 4764:talk 4746:talk 4728:talk 4666:talk 4588:talk 4567:corn 4530:talk 4487:talk 4435:talk 4418:talk 4401:talk 4382:talk 4365:talk 4347:Talk 4305:talk 4288:talk 4213:talk 4150:talk 4102:talk 4068:talk 4051:talk 4034:talk 3987:8000 3981:Fake 3968:talk 3951:talk 3934:talk 3905:talk 3868:talk 3825:talk 3804:talk 3785:talk 3768:talk 3751:talk 3734:talk 3715:talk 3679:talk 3662:talk 3635:< 3607:ser! 3575:talk 3504:talk 3487:talk 3470:talk 3453:talk 3410:talk 3404:okra 3398:Deep 3358:talk 3350:here 3336:talk 3313:Jazz 3283:talk 3185:talk 3168:talk 3138:talk 3121:talk 3103:talk 3086:talk 3069:talk 3038:talk 3009:talk 2992:talk 2975:talk 2958:talk 2937:talk 2933:Elli 2921:talk 2903:talk 2880:talk 2850:Mini 2826:L3X1 2792:talk 2726:talk 2709:talk 2692:talk 2660:talk 2643:talk 2626:talk 2613:talk 2605:Urve 2548:talk 2508:talk 2483:talk 2452:talk 2419:. — 2395:LuK3 2358:Chat 2354:Iffy 2348:per 2339:) • 2312:talk 2206:Seth 2190:talk 2169:talk 2150:talk 2127:talk 2113:talk 2094:talk 2085:Dude 2077:. –– 2066:talk 2049:talk 2028:talk 1994:talk 1960:talk 1943:talk 1926:talk 1922:Urve 1909:talk 1864:talk 1850:talk 1833:talk 1812:talk 1788:--- 1777:talk 1744:talk 1721:Talk 1700:talk 1681:talk 1656:yaya 1642:Just 1626:talk 1604:avix 1588:does 1575:talk 1558:talk 1515:talk 1470:talk 1432:) @ 1426:talk 1392:talk 1238:here 1223:rfar 1205:logs 1173:talk 1105:talk 1091:talk 1028:Yes. 998:very 920:that 719:talk 659:talk 603:swap 455:and 429:Iffy 294:NPOV 292:and 217:and 183:, a 127:talk 88:talk 74:talk 5151:ALK 4953:\\ 4890:\\ 4864:two 4853:MfD 4608:Why 4564:Air 4502:Hús 4458:\\ 4441:) 4359:-- 4007:him 3999:--- 3880:-- 3799:620 3675:Rin 3587:IAm 3339:) 2427:ALK 2379:001 2360:-- 2291:ed. 1956:TNT 1814:) ( 1715:MJL 1684:(); 1421:Tol 1229:spi 1199:AfD 1128:23. 1089:🐉( 1077:OED 1042:22. 1019:21. 1002:JWB 987:20. 945:19. 850:18. 790:17. 750:has 737:SNG 706:15. 647:14. 624:13. 580:12. 540:11. 505:10. 376:or 264:of 57:at 5289:: 5254:) 5224:) 5161:— 5154:— 5147:— 5141:30 5117:) 5086:) 5065:) 5048:) 5032:) 5015:) 5005:? 4999:) 4930:) 4916:) 4819:) 4803:) 4781:| 4766:) 4748:) 4730:) 4683:: 4668:) 4603:So 4590:) 4554:28 4532:) 4512:nd 4489:) 4437:/ 4420:) 4384:) 4367:) 4307:) 4290:) 4215:) 4156:) 4152:• 4104:) 4070:) 4053:) 4036:) 4012:(| 4005:(/ 3970:) 3953:) 3936:) 3928:— 3907:) 3870:) 3849:/ 3827:) 3810:) 3806:· 3787:) 3770:) 3753:) 3736:) 3681:) 3664:) 3618:) 3614:- 3577:) 3524:66 3506:) 3489:) 3472:) 3455:) 3428:ev 3360:) 3285:) 3245:@ 3187:) 3170:) 3140:) 3123:) 3105:) 3088:) 3071:) 3040:) 3022:Ed 3011:) 2994:) 2977:) 2960:) 2943:) 2939:| 2923:) 2905:) 2884:) 2815:📧 2812:💬 2794:) 2734:) 2711:) 2694:) 2662:) 2645:) 2628:) 2615:) 2550:) 2533:) 2510:) 2485:) 2454:) 2437:— 2430:— 2423:— 2314:) 2288:- 2256:-- 2192:) 2175:) 2171:| 2129:) 2115:) 2068:) 2051:) 2034:) 2030:• 2022:– 2000:) 1996:| 1979:) 1945:) 1928:) 1911:) 1894:｠ 1892:📋 1889:💬 1883:🐈 1866:) 1852:) 1835:) 1818:) 1779:) 1759:⁂ 1746:) 1734:, 1702:) 1629:) 1577:) 1560:) 1537:— 1517:) 1511:15 1473:) 1428:| 1394:) 1217:lu 1139:A: 1107:) 1093:) 1052:A: 1026:A: 994:A: 965:, 961:, 957:, 951:A: 895:A: 891:? 830:}} 826:{{ 817:A: 809:📧 806:💬 773:A: 766:16 744:, 728:A: 721:) 682:, 676:, 668:A: 661:) 630:A: 599:G6 591:A: 585:G7 547:A: 512:A: 480:A: 473:9. 440:A: 434:8. 413:A: 403:7. 370:A: 363:6. 347:A: 337:}} 331:{{ 323:5. 286:A: 280:4. 245:A: 239:3. 225:GA 177:A: 171:2. 152:A: 146:1. 129:) 90:) 36:. 5250:( 5220:( 5188:) 5184:( 5181:- 5156:C 5149:T 5123:@ 5113:( 5082:( 5061:( 5044:( 5028:( 5009:( 4995:( 4981:) 4977:( 4974:- 4926:( 4912:( 4815:( 4799:( 4762:( 4744:( 4726:( 4664:( 4586:( 4528:( 4507:ö 4485:( 4433:( 4416:( 4380:( 4363:( 4349:) 4345:( 4323:/ 4303:( 4286:( 4255:T 4211:( 4197:) 4193:( 4167:F 4148:( 4124:L 4100:( 4066:( 4049:( 4032:( 4018:) 4009:) 3966:( 3949:( 3932:( 3903:( 3899:— 3866:( 3853:) 3845:( 3823:( 3783:( 3766:( 3749:( 3732:( 3677:( 3660:( 3640:• 3610:( 3573:( 3536:— 3502:( 3485:( 3468:( 3451:( 3412:) 3408:( 3356:( 3333:( 3281:( 3261:/ 3183:( 3166:( 3136:( 3119:( 3101:( 3084:( 3067:( 3036:( 3007:( 2990:( 2973:( 2956:( 2935:( 2919:( 2901:( 2876:( 2790:( 2729:· 2724:( 2707:( 2690:( 2658:( 2641:( 2624:( 2611:( 2546:( 2529:( 2506:( 2500:: 2496:@ 2481:( 2450:( 2432:C 2425:T 2356:★ 2336:u 2334:/ 2332:t 2329:( 2323:— 2310:( 2276:! 2188:( 2167:( 2125:( 2111:( 2064:( 2047:( 2026:( 1992:( 1975:( 1958:( 1941:( 1924:( 1907:( 1887:｟ 1878:~ 1862:( 1848:( 1831:( 1810:( 1775:( 1742:( 1723:‐ 1719:‐ 1698:( 1678:. 1649:i 1623:( 1602:T 1573:( 1556:( 1513:( 1467:( 1424:( 1390:( 1282:e 1275:t 1268:v 1241:. 1231:) 1226:· 1220:· 1214:· 1208:· 1202:· 1196:· 1189:· 1182:· 1176:· 1171:( 1103:( 973:. 717:( 657:( 389:. 125:( 86:( 77:· 72:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Colin M - Knowledge (XXG)

Index