Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Duja - Knowledge

Source 📝

1591:. From what I can tell by his edit history, Duja seems to be a valuable and experienced editor, civil at the core despite taking part in topics that can easilly derail. He has also been involved in various administrative aspects of Knowledge. As a slightly negative note, his experience in both editing and administration is lacking depth, but he told that himself and I wouldn't hold that against him, especially seeing as I seem to be doing the same thing. He has my support. 651:
Now seriously, before deletion, I would check the page history to see if it wasn't vandalized rather than being outright CSD candidate. If not, I would check whether the CSD criteria apply, and if so, specify the reason for deletion in the summary (otherwise, AfD it if eligible). Finally, I would
877:, experience seems to fit with what they want to do as an admin. Even though they haven't done much vandal fighting, the users last reverts were in July and showed they know the basics, besides I don't see anything in the nom suggesting vandal fighting. User has been here a long time too.-- 586:
affair? I've just said that I'd refrain from using the heavy weaponry, (like e.g. blocking another admin as an extreme example), until I gather some experience. (I said it perhaps subconciously having in mind the entire post-Carnildo RfA affair that I'm fairly acknowledged with).
2349:. Meets my 2k and civility requirements. I also really like the answer to Question #7; besides being accurate, it shows the candidate has a sense of humor, even in situations where he is under pressure. I like that. We all need a sense of humor on Knowledge. Too many don't. :) 378:
Even if I become an admin, I certainly don't intend to change my approach in conflict resolution—I am well aware of the policies which prevent taking admin privileges in content disputes and getting involved into a conflict of interest. There's always an option of posting at
362:-related issues — you can bet it. Here, fringe and extreme POVs abound, and trying to tone the conflict down is often an impossible mission. I'd skip the examples here (I'd be happy to provide them at request). I think I managed to maintain a cool head and stay within 241:
Like Dijxtra said (and my contribs hopefully confirm), I'm kind of a "polymath" (please substitute a less pretentious and more ironic English word, can't find one) or a "dabbler" — while I've touched many aspects of Knowledge by contributing, talking or merely reading
1939:. I support Duja over 150%. With all his edits on topics of the regions of former Yugoslavia. He is the right man for the job. I agree with the nominator. Though, here's a tip for Duja, be careful and don't create many Serb propagandas and write too Serbcentric. 1372:
I am quite impressed by your editing and handling of conflicts. It becomes even more commendable if we bear in mind that you are deeply involved with such hot topics as the Balkan-related ones. I'm also glad to learn that you are willing to clear the backlog on
692:
I am concerned that this RFA will, like many in the past having to deal with Balkan editors, get nationalist sockpuppets. Reflecting nothing on the suitability of the candidate, but I must voice my strong concerns. The crats will have to monitor this closely. –
2563:
I disagree with the above oppose vote, there is nothing in the nomination or answers suggesting the user wants to get involved with anything related to images, and many users don't provide fair-use rationale. And the edit summary usage is a few percent out?
581:
Sorry, but I don't see how it can be plausibly interpreted like that. I referred to "fresh admins", i.e. newly promoted admins, not "fresh users". If one gets hired as e.g. journalist, should he immediately jump into editing the newspaper's equivalent of
1359:
Critical thinking, moral integrity, emotional maturity & tactful reserve are characteristics of this user- at least this is what I see when I look at his wiki personality . I doubt such traits could be detrimental to the wiki admin
107:
editors this ebullient area has ever seen. I just can't remember him making any enemies which is a fact that keeps me in a continued state of awe knowing how easily you make enemies on Balkan related issues (saying he enforces strict
292:
In line with the above, I'm more a "patcher" type of editor (format/wikify/NPOVize/expand/categorize/reorganize/reference/you name it) than a comprehensive in-detail writer. Consequently, I don't have a FA behind me (although
500:
leeway but not a "blank trust" either. In case of 3RR, some leeway needs to be given in cases when the other side in the edit dispute is obviously inserting cruft, crank or other material clearly against e.g.
370:
for the most part (not that I wasn't frustrated on occasion). I even walked away from some articles I still don't agree with (perhaps not a good thing for encyclopedia, but at least better for mental health).
722:
At the end of the voting period, I wish to express my thanks for all of you who supported me (and to those who didn't :-)), rather than spamming the numerous talk pages. I hope I will justify your trust.
1576:. Haven't met him much before, but what I see now looks good, and anybody reaping so much praise after getting their hands dirty with Balkan-related topics simply has to be mature and reliable. 492:
first (although e.g. mass page moves should be stopped quickly). In any case (and even with non-established users), I would give user a warning first (and/or require an apology in cases of
2581:
To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Knowledge:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
352:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
306: 783:. We need more admins and I have a good impression of this candidate. I'm not particularly worried that he has 'only' 94% edit summary usage and less than 200 template edits :) 1703:- we absolutely need more admins interested in Balkans-related issues, and when speaking of a trustworthy and solid editor like Duja, support IMO is the only reasonable vote.-- 2080:
as everyone else has covered. I've never run across the user, but the contribution history is great and so are the answers to questions. Duja is what adminship is for.
116:
to former-Yu themes, he does all sorts of other things on Knowledge, which is extremely rare (ex-Yu editors usually stick to ex-Yu themes). He also contributes content to
655:
Perfect! Too many admins don't check the history and they delete valid articles that were just changed into ridiculous attack pages (I've saved three articles so far). —
198:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1016: 1520:
I cannot believe my eyes: an admin candidate from x-Yugoslavia and nobody objects. Duja, you should be a magician. Besides this, Duja satisfies all my criteria
994:
seemed to me to explain the fair use adequately already. By the way I am an admin and have less than 20 image edits, and most of my template edits are trivial.
239:. I think that fresh admins should engage and garner some experience in "housekeeping" jobs before reaching the "block" button routinely (obvious cases aside). 1663:. I thought he was an admin already, and his answers are good. Also, is the mathbot report not working for anyone else? It gives me some weird login page. -- 565:
I think that fresh admins should engage and garner some experience in "housekeeping" jobs before reaching the "block" button routinely (obvious cases aside)
412:
Hi, could you point me to some of your AfD nominations? (They should still be on your watchlist) Or any AfDs discussions you have been a part of. Thanks.
2752: 2734: 2617:
I know they dont, but it isnt much to ask a user to start using them now and add them to there present fair use uploads (I believe there is only 4 or 5)
2434:- User does not meet my criteria (Major edit summary is less then 94%, i require 95%. Less then 20 image space edits. Less then 200 template edits. Also 2443: 631:? If so, what will you absolutely never ever forget to do when you pull up a speedy candidate? And I mean ever... (A short answer is acceptable) 2530:
which states that it's fair use "...to illustrate the corporation, sports team, or organization in question". Those images are indeed used only in
431: 160:. If I didn't mention something important, that's probably because I forgot it, not because he didn't work on it. Come on, let's give him a mop. -- 2412: 218: 273:
etc.) I'm not really profound in any. For the bad or the good of it, my potential admin activities will probably also be "a bit of everything".
1338: 330: 87:; offers over the email I cannot link here, but I know I asked him more than once. And now he finally accepted the nom, and all of us from 2606:
Many users, including admins don't provide fair-use for their image uploads, I urge you to reconsider your vote. Neutral is just below!--
1925:. Courteous, conscientious user with a solid background and a clearly stated need for admin tools (in areas that need more admins). -- 2662: 2630: 2596: 2554:
I admit I'm less than perfect in edit summaries, most often when I make several consecutive edits—I tend to forget to mark all of them.
2539: 2459: 1580: 1275: 961: 1496: 863: 1043:: Looks like a good and civil editor that has touched various places and followed protocol - plus a perfect answer to my question. — 2693:
I just don't understand the value of manually adding a fair use rationale rehearsing what the fair use template is already stating.
1874: 373: 567:", are you suggesting that users should become admins before gaining the required experience? Please explain/expand this. Thanks.-- 1819: 1565: 1447: 1028: 33: 17: 2531: 1969: 210: 2192: 1577: 433: 2546: 2514: 1347: 1297: 2334: 2312: 2227: 1802: 1320: 652:
notice the article's creator. I'm not sure which of those steps you will consider "essential" but there's the answer...
2575:
Fair use rationales are a must for my support, i'd be willing to switch to a support now I know of his commons account
1483:
per excellent answers to questions; seems to be a good editor and will do well with those power tools! All the best, —
339:); I think I'm mostly able to distance myself away from the subject and present the conflicting POVs in a fair manner. 2408: 1814: 206: 76: 2280: 1692: 915: 286:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
270: 685: 427: 2384:. There's nothing quite like a pile, especially when you're all the way on top. Seems like a pretty good user. 1333: 1218: 891:. Balkan, South Slavic and former Yugoslavia issues definitely need a devoted admin who knows the matter well. 322: 228: 214: 2446:
bother me, there are no fair use rationales on those images.) - User requires a little more experiance first.
2240: 1408: 2659: 2627: 2593: 2456: 958: 2535: 2331: 2323: 2309: 2301: 1799: 1791: 1270: 896: 140:. His interaction with community is abundant both on his talk page and on wikipedia_talk pages. He started 2404: 1490: 1460:
I know him for a long time, and until now I did not know that he live in the same city as I do. LOL :))))
1302: 924: 2249: 1240: 753: 2656: 2624: 2590: 2453: 2167: 2163: 2151: 1870: 1833: 1611: 1509: 1384: 1149: 955: 857: 2733:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
2435: 2322:
regarding that, it was completely unintentional and I was not acting with malicious intentions. Sorry!
2510:;) only a few fair-use ones are on en:. As for the fair use rationale, I initially did mark them with 2439: 1865: 1857: 1716: 1630:- per nom, a willingness to get into the mud (in a good way) and the fact that we need good admins -- 974:, looks good, although I don't understand why you added these extra fair use rationales. The standard 2288: 1562: 1443: 1177: 1161: 2260: 2146: 2130: 2012: 1963: 1860: 1644: 1431: 1418: 1048: 851: 660: 615: 79:) – He should have become an admin a long time ago. But he just refused to accept the nomination: 2698: 2186: 2101: 2096: 2057: 2016: 1653: 1596: 1521: 1468: 1265: 1181: 1173: 1128: 1009: 988: 899: 893: 839: 543: 1725: 2704: 2688: 2667: 2644: 2635: 2612: 2601: 2570: 2558: 2496: 2484: 2464: 2416: 2395: 2376: 2364: 2355: 2337: 2315: 2291: 2267: 2251: 2231: 2210: 2198: 2171: 2154: 2136: 2107: 2086: 2081: 2072: 2060: 2045: 2033: 2021: 2003: 1991: 1975: 1943: 1931: 1917: 1905: 1892: 1879: 1848: 1836: 1824: 1805: 1782: 1756: 1740: 1728: 1719: 1707: 1695: 1679: 1667: 1655: 1634: 1622: 1602: 1583: 1568: 1550: 1536: 1524: 1512: 1500: 1475: 1452: 1422: 1395: 1364: 1351: 1341: 1324: 1307: 1280: 1255: 1231: 1208: 1196: 1184: 1164: 1152: 1132: 1115: 1099: 1052: 1035: 1001: 966: 940: 928: 903: 883: 869: 842: 826: 814: 802: 787: 775: 756: 747: 727: 713: 700: 664: 619: 599: 573: 546: 532: 182: 164: 84: 2608: 2566: 2361: 2042: 1984: 1485: 1293: 920: 912: 879: 595: 569: 554: 528: 403: 335:
As I see it, perhaps my best plus side is my ability to NPOVize things (cynics would say, use
88: 2680:
The candidate doesn't have the moon on a stick either. That's no reason to oppose them. (200
1069: 2481: 2373: 2239:
Seriously, Duja is certainly a trustworthy user and will make good use of the extra buttons
2223: 2030: 1829: 1389: 744: 710: 697: 646: 638: 388: 326: 2385: 1688: 1619: 1559: 1439: 1361: 1288:
good enough for me. Actively works on a wikiproject. Also, we need more serbian editors --
1205: 1193: 1025: 998: 799: 481: 363: 314: 302: 262: 121: 376:
well—I probably should have taken a deeper breath; it settled one way or another, anyway.
706:
Concerns have obviously not materialised, although it's worth keeping an eye on this. –
2116: 1957: 1902: 1765: 1749: 1533: 1413: 1405: 1044: 656: 611: 510: 384: 251: 236: 141: 70: 1403:
per the nominee's answers, and the experience definitely a bonus. Excellent editor. --
2746: 2694: 2685: 2524: 2504: 2489: 2350: 2326: 2304: 2180: 2054: 1940: 1889: 1794: 1649: 1592: 1461: 1374: 1125: 1108: 978: 937: 835: 811: 784: 539: 506: 493: 477: 473: 449: 380: 367: 336: 266: 247: 232: 157: 149: 2493: 2207: 2000: 1676: 1289: 772: 502: 489: 472:
out of consideration) contribution to the project, I'd say it would be breaches of
310: 259: 255: 243: 161: 153: 145: 1216:
Seems like a perfectly good admin candidate, based on answers to questions above.
1064:
is indeed a lovely city! Finally, at last, I found someone I can trust to take my
1887:
Never intereacted w/ the user but i trust most of the votes above. Good luck. --
513:(note that 3RR excludes "simple vandalism" but there are many borderline cases). 2478: 2219: 2011:, Duja scores 20.5 on my Admin Assessment scale, enough to warrant a Support -- 1926: 1737: 1664: 1631: 1541: 1379: 1316: 823: 741: 707: 694: 469: 298: 117: 1315:
Meets my standards, and has shown his longevity and dedication to Knowledge.--
205:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
2727:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1704: 1615: 995: 796: 359: 80: 136:- the man introduced himself even before he started editing) and accumulated 2641: 2555: 2507: 2069: 1145: 724: 681: 588: 583: 514: 438: 392: 340: 318: 297::-) ). If I'd have to single out some articles, I think I did a good job in 274: 179: 66: 56: 795:. Unquestioning approval. Duja is a good man and will make a fine admin. - 458:
Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an established user?
2579:
i'm unwilling to do so until his fair use images are rationalies: (per: "
1914: 1845: 1715:- This is the kind of hard working admins that we need here in Knowledge. 1160:. Apparently level-headed, long-term editor with many substantive edits. 1061: 752:
Provded no socks come out of the woodwork, i think I would support Duja.
98: 2473:
Regarding images there is always a possibility the user contributes to
2115:
I've never actually interacted with Duja, but everything looks good. --
628: 1764:. Great candidate for admin on Knowledge. User has my full support. -- 2737:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2552:). Sorry, but I don't see which additional rationale is called for. 2474: 269:, article space of course, categorization, numerous templates like 496:). I think "established users" in the above sense should be given 1140:. There are little (or no) admins from where he comes - and he 59: 645:
time. I will absolutely never ever forget to copy the page to
464:
If under "established user" we understand a user with a long
171:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
538:
Apologies Andeh - I'd changed the link but not the proxy. --
148:. He also takes part in the dirty tasks: he is a regular on 2275:
because I believe he will make a wonderful administrator.
850:
per nom. Very good answer to question 1 too. Good luck! --
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
235:, and later perhaps more engage in handling things like 227:
For the start, I'd like to help clearing up backlogs at
91:
community can start celebrating, because he is the most
2276: 1558:- thoughtful response to questions, good edit history. 1264:. Ringing endorsement from nominator and good answers. 1065: 948:- Concerns met (per Oppose #1) - and per AndehPandy.UK 436: 422: 419: 129: 2649:
Concerns have been met and i've switched accordingly.
2360:
This one's obvious, and I thought he was one already.
2144:- strong editor, has the core mission of WP at heart. 1508:
Why did HolyRomanEmperor remove my last support vote?
112:
would be an understatement here). Except from being a
641:
but frankly, I got tired soon. I probably will spend
307:
Differences in standard Serbian, Croatian and Bosnian
1642:
Thoughtful answers to questions and a great user. --
810:. Will be nice to have such a clear-minded admin. -- 1687:- absolutely no reason to expect abuse of buttons. 2041:per nom, particularly impressed with the answers. 1614:and a willingness to edit contriversal articles -- 152:, has voted on AfDs, TfD, CfD, has contributed to 2503:I upload most of my self-made images to Commons ( 1913:. Excellent editor; should do well as an admin. 1060:: How can one object to this nomination? Also, 526:; I didn't add question 5! Check the history.-- 358:Having dealt with numerous pages related with 305:mostly by myself, and significantly shaped up 2477:and therefore has a low image-space count. – 8: 372:To be honest, I don't think I handled e.g. 1951:Per good answers to the questions above: 1107:. Levelheaded and civil editor. Regards, 736:(for expressing views without numbering) 1844:. Good editor, will be a good admin. -- 1790:Excellent editor, has my full support. 740:I would trust Duja with admin tools. – 1983:. Excellent, deserves to be an admin. 1138:Undoubtful Gargantually Strong Support 418:Some AfD nominations (not so recent): 1748:My kind of Admin, passes my criteria 331:Knowledge:WikiProject Contract bridge 7: 1813:. Great editor, meets my criteria.-- 124:. He has been with (some of) us for 2684:edits? How irrelevant ca you get?) 2540:The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge 2065:Excellent answers to questions and 1377:. Many more pros. Definitely yes.-- 1239:Appears to be an excellent editor. 637:Ugh, I spent a bit of time tagging 488:, I'd like to get more opinions on 144:and is one of founding members of 24: 2753:Successful requests for adminship 2542:pages (the latter image has also 2492:has more than 200 image edits. -- 2259:I think you'll do a great job. 333:(hmm, a bit slowed down lately). 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 2532:American Contract Bridge League 211:Category:Administrative backlog 2705:16:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 2689:12:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2668:13:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2645:13:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2640:FWIW, I added the rationales. 2636:12:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2613:12:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2602:12:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2571:12:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2559:11:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2497:11:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2485:10:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2465:10:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2356:23:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 2316:22:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 2292:18:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 2268:03:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 2252:20:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2232:16:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2211:16:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2199:05:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2172:03:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2155:01:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2137:21:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2108:21:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2087:19:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2073:15:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2061:03:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2046:01:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2034:23:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 2022:23:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 2004:22:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1992:21:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1976:20:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1944:20:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1932:14:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1918:13:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1906:12:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1893:11:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1880:09:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1849:04:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1837:02:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1825:01:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1806:00:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1783:00:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1757:00:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1741:22:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1729:22:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1720:21:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1708:21:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1696:18:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1680:17:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1668:17:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1656:17:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1635:16:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1623:16:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1603:16:42, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1584:15:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1569:15:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1551:13:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1537:13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1525:09:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1513:04:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1501:03:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1476:03:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1453:00:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1423:23:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1396:23:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1365:23:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1352:23:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1325:22:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1308:21:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1281:21:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1256:19:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1232:19:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1209:19:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1197:19:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1185:18:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1165:18:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1153:18:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1133:17:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1116:16:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1100:16:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1053:15:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1036:14:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1017:13:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1002:13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 967:13:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 941:12:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 929:12:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 911:Seems like an excellent user. 904:12:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 884:12:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 870:12:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 843:12:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 827:12:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 815:12:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 803:11:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 788:10:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 776:10:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 757:03:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 748:23:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 714:23:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 701:10:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 665:15:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 620:13:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 600:12:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 593:{{subst:weaksupport}} it is.-- 574:12:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 547:11:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 533:11:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 183:10:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 165:18:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 97:one of (let us all now bow to 1: 1260:Less than 200 template edits 1204:, looks like a great editor. 430:Some recent AfD discussions: 2520:, but then I discovered the 1901:He will make a great admin. 1144:than qualifies according to 219:administrators' reading list 156:and has reported vandals to 2417:08:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 2396:03:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 2377:10:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 2365:05:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 2338:21:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 2237:Jumping on the pile Support 728:09:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 684:'s edit summary usage with 649:if I find it amusing... :-) 627:Will you spend any time in 194:Questions for the candidate 55:Final (90/0/0) Ended 10:18 2769: 2053:per nom and good answers. 2029:per nom and all of above. 925:(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 563:In answer one you stated " 213:, and read the page about 207:Category:Knowledge backlog 2279:06:11, 30 September 2006 2730:Please do not modify it. 1148:'s standards for one. -- 793:Petition firmly accepted 323:Contract bridge glossary 229:Category:Requested moves 81:first offer (in Serbian) 2536:World Bridge Federation 2206:. Just pile it on! -- 176:I accept the nomination 39:Please do not modify it 2352:Firsfron of Ronchester 466:primarily constructive 132:for an example of his 2400:Hm... 90th person to 1736:- a strong candidate 1675:per nom, good editor 1123:- a true NPOV user. — 83:and then a bit later 34:request for adminship 2547:Non-free fair use in 2515:Non-free fair use in 1724:No reason not to. - 834:A fine candidate. -- 138:more than 5500 edits 2162:—Easy call. Do it. 85:the RfA he declined 2405:Michael Billington 2319:- Duplicate !vote 2300:no problems here. 1856:, great editor. -- 1394: 1192:Very good editor. 2703: 2666: 2634: 2600: 2508:my contribs there 2505:commons:User:Duja 2490:commons:User:Duja 2475:Wikimedia Commons 2463: 1974: 1956: 1930: 1601: 1451: 1421: 1378: 965: 927: 360:former Yugoslavia 126:more than 2 years 114:great contributor 102: 89:former Yugoslavia 2760: 2732: 2697: 2665: 2650: 2633: 2618: 2611: 2599: 2584: 2569: 2551: 2545: 2529: 2523: 2519: 2513: 2462: 2447: 2393: 2388: 2353: 2329: 2307: 2265: 2247: 2246: 2195: 2189: 2183: 2124: 2104: 2099: 2084: 1999:. Looks good. -- 1989: 1972: 1966: 1962: 1960: 1955: 1929: 1863: 1822: 1797: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1754: 1652: 1647: 1595: 1547: 1473: 1466: 1437: 1434: 1417: 1411: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1305: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1251: 1244: 1230: 1228: 1223: 1150:HolyRomanEmperor 1131: 1113: 1097: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1033: 1014: 993: 987: 983: 977: 964: 949: 923: 918: 882: 866: 860: 854: 675:General comments 639:Special:Newpages 598: 572: 557: 531: 452: 406: 329:. I have set up 327:Duplicate bridge 295:I do have a plan 96: 41: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2735:this nomination 2728: 2663:52278 Alpha 771 2657:Fenton, Matthew 2651: 2631:52278 Alpha 771 2625:Fenton, Matthew 2619: 2607: 2597:52278 Alpha 771 2591:Fenton, Matthew 2585: 2565: 2549: 2543: 2527: 2521: 2517: 2511: 2460:52278 Alpha 771 2454:Fenton, Matthew 2448: 2389: 2386: 2351: 2327: 2305: 2289:trialsanderrors 2261: 2242: 2241: 2193: 2187: 2181: 2135: 2120: 2102: 2097: 2082: 2019: 2017:Rocks Collide! 1985: 1970: 1964: 1958: 1953:Give-em-the-mop 1878: 1861: 1820: 1795: 1776: 1771: 1766: 1750: 1645: 1643: 1543: 1499: 1469: 1462: 1432: 1409: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1350: 1323: 1301: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1249: 1242: 1224: 1219: 1217: 1162:Espresso Addict 1124: 1109: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1072: 1070: 1066:block-virginity 1029: 1010: 991: 985: 981: 975: 962:52278 Alpha 771 956:Fenton, Matthew 950: 916: 878: 864: 858: 852: 771:as nominator -- 610:Question from — 594: 568: 553: 527: 448: 402: 315:Gorani (Kosovo) 303:Screen (bridge) 52: 37: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2766: 2764: 2756: 2755: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2739: 2723: 2722: 2714: 2713: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2691: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2615: 2561: 2553: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2468: 2467: 2420: 2419: 2398: 2379: 2372:Seems sound.-- 2367: 2358: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2282: 2270: 2254: 2234: 2216:Pileon Support 2213: 2201: 2177:Strong Support 2174: 2157: 2142:STrong Support 2139: 2129: 2110: 2089: 2075: 2067:Strong Support 2063: 2048: 2036: 2024: 2015: 2006: 1994: 1978: 1946: 1937:Strong Support 1934: 1920: 1908: 1896: 1882: 1868: 1851: 1839: 1827: 1808: 1785: 1759: 1743: 1731: 1722: 1713:Strong Support 1710: 1698: 1693:picture popups 1682: 1670: 1658: 1640:Strong Support 1637: 1625: 1605: 1586: 1571: 1553: 1539: 1527: 1518:Strong Support 1515: 1503: 1489: 1478: 1455: 1425: 1398: 1370:Strong Support 1367: 1357:Strong Support 1354: 1346: 1327: 1319: 1310: 1283: 1258: 1234: 1211: 1199: 1187: 1167: 1155: 1135: 1118: 1102: 1055: 1038: 1019: 1004: 969: 943: 931: 906: 886: 872: 845: 829: 817: 808:Strong support 805: 790: 778: 760: 759: 754:205.157.110.11 750: 731: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 689: 686:mathbot's tool 677: 676: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 650: 622: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 558: 552:Question from 536: 535: 520: 519: 518: 517: 484:. In cases of 453: 447:Question from 444: 443: 442: 441: 429: 407: 401:Question from 398: 397: 396: 395: 377: 371: 346: 345: 344: 343: 334: 280: 279: 278: 277: 240: 215:administrators 196: 195: 190: 188: 187: 186: 185: 51: 46: 45: 44: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2765: 2754: 2751: 2750: 2748: 2738: 2736: 2731: 2725: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2712: 2711: 2706: 2702: 2701: 2696: 2692: 2690: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2669: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2622: 2616: 2614: 2610: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2588: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2562: 2560: 2557: 2548: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2526: 2516: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2495: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2451: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2383: 2380: 2378: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2348: 2345: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2325: 2321: 2320: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2311: 2308: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2286: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2274: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2264: 2258: 2255: 2253: 2250: 2248: 2245: 2238: 2235: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2214: 2212: 2209: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2196: 2190: 2184: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2148: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2114: 2111: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2100: 2093: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2062: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1990: 1988: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1973: 1967: 1961: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1945: 1942: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1895: 1894: 1891: 1886: 1883: 1881: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1864: 1859: 1855: 1852: 1850: 1847: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1793: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1774: 1769: 1763: 1760: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1727: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1662: 1659: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612:MatthewFenton 1609: 1606: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1594: 1590: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1540: 1538: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1510:TruthCrusader 1507: 1504: 1502: 1498: 1497:damage report 1495: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1467: 1465: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1436: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1376: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1263: 1259: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1245: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1227: 1222: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1127: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 997: 990: 980: 973: 970: 968: 963: 960: 957: 953: 947: 944: 942: 939: 935: 932: 930: 926: 922: 919: 914: 910: 907: 905: 902: 901: 898: 895: 890: 887: 885: 881: 876: 873: 871: 867: 861: 855: 849: 846: 844: 841: 837: 833: 830: 828: 825: 821: 818: 816: 813: 809: 806: 804: 801: 798: 794: 791: 789: 786: 782: 779: 777: 774: 770: 767: 766: 765: 764: 758: 755: 751: 749: 746: 743: 739: 738: 737: 735: 730: 729: 726: 715: 712: 709: 705: 704: 703: 702: 699: 696: 690: 687: 683: 679: 678: 674: 673: 666: 662: 658: 654: 653: 648: 644: 640: 636: 633: 632: 630: 626: 623: 621: 617: 613: 609: 608: 601: 597: 592: 591: 590: 585: 580: 577: 576: 575: 571: 566: 562: 559: 556: 551: 550: 549: 548: 545: 541: 534: 530: 525: 522: 521: 516: 512: 508: 504: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 460: 459: 457: 454: 451: 446: 445: 440: 437: 434: 432: 428: 425: 423: 420: 417: 414: 413: 411: 408: 405: 400: 399: 394: 390: 386: 382: 375: 369: 365: 361: 357: 354: 353: 351: 348: 347: 342: 338: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 291: 288: 287: 285: 282: 281: 276: 272: 268: 264: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 238: 234: 230: 226: 223: 222: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 200: 199: 193: 192: 191: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173: 172: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 100: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 75: 72: 68: 64: 63: 61: 58: 50: 47: 43: 40: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 2729: 2726: 2716: 2715: 2699: 2681: 2652: 2620: 2586: 2580: 2576: 2449: 2430: 2428: 2422: 2421: 2401: 2390: 2381: 2369: 2347:Full Support 2346: 2324:Wikipediarul 2302:Wikipediarul 2297: 2296: 2284: 2272: 2262: 2256: 2243: 2236: 2215: 2203: 2179:as per nom. 2176: 2159: 2145: 2141: 2131: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2095: 2091: 2077: 2066: 2050: 2043:Irongargoyle 2038: 2026: 2008: 1996: 1986: 1980: 1952: 1948: 1936: 1922: 1910: 1898: 1888: 1884: 1853: 1841: 1815: 1810: 1792:Wikipediarul 1787: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1761: 1751: 1745: 1733: 1712: 1700: 1684: 1672: 1660: 1639: 1627: 1607: 1597: 1588: 1573: 1555: 1544: 1529: 1517: 1505: 1493: 1486:riana_dzasta 1484: 1480: 1470: 1463: 1457: 1427: 1404: 1400: 1369: 1356: 1337: 1336: 1329: 1312: 1285: 1261: 1248: 1247: 1241: 1236: 1225: 1220: 1213: 1201: 1189: 1176: 1169: 1157: 1141: 1137: 1120: 1110: 1104: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1078: 1057: 1040: 1030: 1021: 1012:Rama's arrow 1011: 1006: 971: 951: 946:Weak support 945: 933: 908: 892: 888: 875:Weak support 874: 847: 831: 819: 807: 797:FrancisTyers 792: 780: 768: 762: 761: 733: 732: 721: 691: 642: 634: 624: 578: 564: 560: 537: 523: 497: 485: 465: 461: 455: 415: 409: 355: 349: 337:weasel words 311:Montenegrins 294: 289: 283: 224: 202: 197: 189: 175: 170: 137: 134:good manners 133: 125: 113: 109: 104: 92: 73: 65: 54: 53: 48: 38: 30: 28: 2374:Holdenhurst 2277:Yamaguchi先生 2164:Williamborg 2132:Talk to me! 2031:Newyorkbrad 1830:Merovingian 1717:Doctor Evil 1491:wreak havoc 299:Bidding box 120:themes and 93:levelheaded 2660:Lexic Dark 2628:Lexic Dark 2594:Lexic Dark 2457:Lexic Dark 2182:Хајдук Еру 2152:BLabberiNg 1560:Briangotts 1362:Mir Harven 1339:fellibylur 1206:Themindset 1194:Hello32020 959:Lexic Dark 734:Discussion 486:disruption 130:first edit 118:linguistic 31:successful 2244:hoopydink 2013:Lego@lost 1959:JungleCat 1941:Crna Gora 1903:Hectorian 1752:†he Bread 1578:Fut.Perf. 1566:(Contrib) 1534:Conscious 1522:abakharev 1360:position. 1334:íslenskur 1146:wikipedia 1045:Wknight94 989:bookcover 936:Why not? 865:review me 822:per nom. 657:Wknight94 647:WP:BJAODN 612:Wknight94 584:Watergate 389:WP:AN/3RR 374:this case 319:Torlakian 128:(see his 105:respected 57:2 October 2747:Category 2695:Equendil 2686:The Land 2682:template 2413:contribs 2263:zephyr2k 2228:contribs 2147:Blnguyen 2103:darkness 2055:Garion96 1628:Suppport 1593:Equendil 1464:PANONIAN 1448:contribs 1444:messages 1430:. --Slgr 1348:(samtal) 1298:contribs 1243:Canadian 1111:Asterion 1062:Novi Sad 938:The Land 934:Support. 909:Support. 900:Bozhinov 836:Mcginnly 812:dcabrilo 540:Mcginnly 482:WP:CIVIL 450:Mcginnly 364:WP:CIVIL 263:WP:WSS/P 217:and the 77:contribs 2717:Neutral 2494:Dijxtra 2402:Support 2382:Support 2370:Support 2298:Support 2285:Support 2273:Support 2257:Support 2204:Support 2160:Support 2113:Support 2092:Support 2078:Support 2051:Support 2039:Support 2027:Support 2009:Support 2001:Ligulem 1997:Support 1981:Support 1971:contrib 1949:Support 1923:Support 1911:Support 1899:Support 1885:Support 1866:nce Ong 1854:Support 1842:Support 1821:TaLk?!? 1811:Support 1788:Support 1762:Support 1746:Support 1734:Support 1701:Support 1685:Support 1677:Anger22 1673:Support 1661:Support 1650:iva1979 1608:Support 1589:Support 1574:Support 1556:Support 1530:Support 1506:Support 1481:Support 1458:Support 1428:Support 1401:Support 1330:Support 1313:Support 1290:Ageo020 1286:Support 1262:support 1237:Support 1226:gitica) 1221:(aeropa 1214:Support 1202:Support 1190:Support 1174:Mailer 1170:Support 1158:Support 1121:Support 1105:Support 1058:Support 1041:Support 1022:Support 1007:Support 972:Support 889:Support 848:Support 832:Support 824:Michael 820:Support 781:Support 773:Dijxtra 769:Support 763:Support 629:CAT:CSD 511:WP:NPOV 385:WP:AN/I 252:WP:AN/I 237:WP:AN/I 162:Dijxtra 142:WP:WPCB 2653:thanks 2621:thanks 2587:thanks 2450:thanks 2431:Oppose 2423:Oppose 2220:Malber 2058:(talk) 1927:Merope 1890:Szvest 1738:gidonb 1665:tjstrf 1632:Tawker 1610:- per 1563:(Talk) 1471:(talk) 1375:WP:RQM 1317:danntm 1272:master 952:thanks 921:rbil10 840:Natter 785:Haukur 544:Natter 507:WP:NOR 494:WP:NPA 478:WP:NPA 474:WP:3RR 468:(i.e. 381:WP:RfC 368:WP:NPA 267:WP:RfC 248:WP:AfD 233:WP:AfD 158:WP:ANI 150:WP:RQM 122:bridge 2609:Andeh 2567:Andeh 2564:So.-- 2391:Chimp 2387:alpha 2118:Mr. L 2098:light 1987:Shyam 1705:Aldux 1689:Zocky 1435:ndson 1419:talk! 1303:count 1267:Grand 1250:Bacon 1182:iablo 1031:juice 1026:Mango 996:Kusma 913:RyanG 894:Todor 880:Andeh 596:Andeh 570:Andeh 555:Andeh 529:Andeh 503:WP:RS 490:WP:AN 404:Andeh 271:those 260:WP:CP 256:WP:AN 244:WP:RM 154:WP:CP 146:WP:FY 103:most 62:(UTC) 16:< 2700:Talk 2642:Duja 2583:"). 2556:Duja 2538:and 2525:logo 2482:acor 2444:this 2442:and 2440:this 2436:this 2409:talk 2335:2221 2313:2221 2224:talk 2194:Cont 2188:Talk 2168:Bill 2083:Teke 2070:Jcam 1965:talk 1834:Talk 1803:2221 1768:Nish 1726:Mike 1598:Talk 1440:page 1406:Core 1294:talk 1172:. - 1142:more 1129:khoi 1126:Khoi 1049:talk 999:(討論) 984:and 979:logo 859:talk 853:Alex 745:acor 725:Duja 711:acor 698:acor 682:Duja 680:See 661:talk 643:some 616:talk 589:Duja 524:NOTE 515:Duja 509:and 498:some 480:and 470:WP:V 439:Duja 393:Duja 366:and 341:Duja 325:and 301:and 275:Duja 231:and 209:and 180:Duja 110:NPOV 95:and 71:talk 67:Duja 60:2006 49:Duja 2577:but 2362:1ne 2218:-- 2191:|| 2126:fty 1915:PJM 1858:Ter 1846:MCB 1816:TBC 1773:kid 1620:rex 1542:Max 1410:des 1381:Hús 1342:#12 426:], 387:or 99:Joy 2749:: 2550:}} 2544:{{ 2534:, 2528:}} 2522:{{ 2518:}} 2512:{{ 2479:Ch 2438:, 2415:) 2411:• 2287:~ 2230:) 2226:• 2208:RM 2197:) 2170:) 2150:| 2094:-- 2020:| 1873:| 1832:- 1778:64 1691:| 1548:em 1532:. 1446:- 1442:- 1414:at 1391:nd 1332:. 1306:) 1300:• 1296:• 1277:ka 1082:il 1071:•N 1068:! 1051:) 1024:. 992:}} 986:{{ 982:}} 976:{{ 868:| 862:/ 856:| 838:| 742:Ch 708:Ch 695:Ch 663:) 635:A: 625:7. 618:) 579:A: 561:6. 542:| 505:, 476:, 462:A: 456:5. 435:, 424:, 421:, 416:A: 410:4. 391:. 383:, 356:A: 350:3. 321:, 317:, 313:, 309:, 290:A: 284:2. 265:, 258:, 254:, 250:, 246:, 225:A: 221:. 203:1. 178:. 36:. 2655:/ 2623:/ 2589:/ 2452:/ 2429:* 2407:( 2332:s 2328:e 2310:s 2306:e 2222:( 2185:( 2166:( 2122:e 1968:/ 1877:) 1875:C 1871:T 1869:( 1862:e 1800:s 1796:e 1646:S 1618:- 1616:T 1581:☼ 1545:S 1494:| 1450:) 1438:( 1433:@ 1386:ö 1321:C 1292:( 1246:- 1178:D 1096:• 1094:r 1090:e 1086:v 1080:S 1077:o 1075:k 1073:i 1047:( 954:/ 917:e 897:→ 800:· 688:. 659:( 614:( 242:( 101:) 74:· 69:( 42:.

Index

Knowledge:Requests for adminship
request for adminship
Duja
2 October
2006
Duja
talk
contribs
first offer (in Serbian)
the RfA he declined
former Yugoslavia
Joy
linguistic
bridge
first edit
WP:WPCB
WP:FY
WP:RQM
WP:CP
WP:ANI
Dijxtra
18:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Duja
10:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Category:Knowledge backlog
Category:Administrative backlog
administrators
administrators' reading list
Category:Requested moves
WP:AfD

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.