664:
supposed to only be used to protect the encyclopedia; someone who is being abusive and incivil, in my opinion, is doing just that (a pissed off editor who has to walk away from the computer for a few hours is, oddly, less productive), and may be blocked accordingly (although, if the incivility is being directed at an admin, it should be done by a neutral third party). Attitude-derived blocks should only come with
85:) - I think he is a good editor in general, who has made 3000 edits (or more, i don't know exactly since kate's wanabee tool isn't working) since his registration occurred in December 2005. He has been more active in the last few months, and given the mainspace/talk ratio i think he could be a fairly good admin. I have seen him revert a fair amount of vandalism (especially on
569:
editing "attitude" (for lack of a better term), but shift my attentions towards the project side (as opposed to the encyclopedia side,). I don't think being an admin would dampen my encyclopedia contributions, but I'd certainly like to help out in even more ways (protecting pages from vandalism is, in its own way, helping to contribute to the quality of the encyclopedia).
731:
flag the article for speedy deletion (I would, however, submit its AfD, or if it is already in AfD, I'd merely call for its deletion). If, however, the article reads as an ad, I'd prod it for speedy deletion, and if contested, submit its AfD. If the article is merely non-notable but doesn't read like
663:
I think "punitive" here is a bit of a misnomer and depends on your point of view (the one being blocked will most likely see it as punitive, given that putting giant penises on multiple Pokémon articles seems like a good idea to them). At the risk of sounding like I'm regurgitating WP:BP, blocking is
715:
Attitude – Attitude is everything. I'm willing to assume good faith, but if the editor is more interested in belittling opponents than in discussing ways in which he or she could improve the article and perhaps save it from deletion (assuming that it was proded for speedy deletion, contested, and
411:). The solution to this issue was... well, to tell him to leave me the hell alone and to restrict all communication to just content discussion. I'd like to note that I was quite cordial to him after I'd told him point-blank that he shouldn't talk to me about anything other than content discussion.
711:
contribution the editor has made, my (left) eyebrow goes up. If the contributing editor has made numerous other edits, I'd merely assume that the subject is something that they have a passing knowledge of and felt worthy of inclusion (which means they might know something I don't; after a bit of
1435:
article and uses profanity in an edit summary should have the magical powers of an admin. But seriously, I thought it was really cool that EVula asked for an editor review to improve him/herself. That coupled with some of his other deeds (AfDs, userboxes, etc) makes it easy to give my support.
568:
All seriousness aside, I see it as an extension of my existing contributions. As I stated, a lot of my edits are of the gnomish variety; doing things in the background that make life easier and the encyclopedia better, but aren't necessarily over-the-top extraordinary. I'd like to keep the same
545:
worked up over a situation (at least once or twice with all three situations mentioned above), in which case I simply try to divert my editing attentions (in the case of
Justinpwilson's persistent use of my talk page, it made it highly difficult for me to just ignore him, so I walked away from
618:— The fact that this rule even exists (and that it is policy) makes me happy to no end. With so many rules, it is quite easy to be overwhelmed; its mere existence, to me, says "just make a damn encyclopedia," which is what Knowledge at its core is. As for how I would apply it, well,
622:
as my rationale for keeping a external link template. I'm honestly not sure how else I'd apply it, as it would really depend on the situation... if this answer seems lame to anyone (and could potentially swing your support), let me know and I'll see about expanding on it
696:
fewer alarms than "XYZ is a leading developer of self-sufficient foo". It is entirely possible for an article to be written fairly neutrally but still be spam, though, which leads me (and you, if you're not trying to imagine what "self-sufficient foo" is) to my second
281:). I'm still quite pleased with the work I did on this article, though I still vacillate between correcting the headings or leaving them as-is... (uncap them, as per the Manual of Style, or leave them uncapped, as per the source book? Decisions decisions...)
862:
Haha, thanks. I think that Evula's screen name is based upon one too, so I felt it appropriate. Correct me if I'm wrong, EVula, but is your username based upon the episode of
Futurama "The Farnsworth Parabox" where the professor refers to
491:, and was removing perfectly valid content without explanation (which constitutes vandalism, in my opinion). With every revert I performed, I tried to tweak the copy in an attempt to guess at what his problem with the existing article was.
2054:, I was going to put down Oppose, just so the unanimity didn't go to EVula's head... Seriously though, the answers to the questions were good and even the editing conflicts were minor or cases where EVula was on the correct side of
1754:
around various XfD's, and his comments there are consistently well formulated and based on sound policy interpretation. Answers to questions here demonstrate forthrightness and a mature demeanor. Should be an excellent admin.
691:
The tone of the article — an article that addresses the subject's contributions to the world (or, on a less grandiose scale, simply establishes its notability) without pushing its individual products or services sets off far,
288:
variety. Tweaks to image captions (removing periods when they aren't called for), formatting titles properly, uncapping headings, etc. I've also gotten into adding WikiProject banners wherever I can; I recently went through
380:
to discuss the issue); it was actually DreamGuy's negative attitude towards the article that prompted me to overhaul it (seriously, just to shut him up). The ultimate solution was just to let the Zombie matter drop for a
736:
hard-pressed to assume good faith about whether his or her attitude about
Knowledge reflects a desire to build an encyclopedia, rather than push self-sufficient foo (and, subsequently, I'd submit an AfD).
668:
evidence, though (I'm talking about dozens of diffs, an indisputable history of incivility/harrassment, and several attempts at corrective measures with no evidence that the behavior is going to change).
1034:
EVula is a very dedicated and communicative editor. He took the suggestions on his editor review on board, demonstrating that he is willing to improve and step into another level of participation within
727:
If I happen across an article about a rather non-notable company, written by either an established member (here simply meaning "not single purpose") or by a new member who is open to feedback, I would
510:
In the end, he finally gave up adding bad information, and we were able to call a truce. In hindsight, I realize that I should have handled that particular situation differently (in my editor review,
356:). To this day, I believe he is an abusive editor, who bullies others and violates rules willy-nilly whenever he feels like it. My particular problem came from attempts at adding the aforementioned
732:
an advertisement, but the contributing editor is obviously suffering from a conflict of interest (all his article, article talk, user talk, and image edits are about that one article), I would be
1815:. Not afraid to be assertive -- I saw that during Elonka's RfA (I don't rememebr which side she was on, but she was questioning one of the other commenters) -- yet always civil. Nice balance. --
466:
article had suffered from loads and loads of what can only be described as concentrated drivel. I worked very hard to trim out all the BS and institute an aggressive source citation system.
533:). It resulted in a clarified guideline, and I've adjusted my editing accordingly (and revisited my edits that touched off the whole thing to begin with, which Kaldari had forgotten about
193:
333:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
619:
321:. There were a few that were protected, though, and all I could do was post a request to the talk page. Of course, if I was an admin, I wouldn't have to do that... *doe eyes*
476:, although I didn't report him; instead, I used his talk page to try to address the myriad issues I had with his edits (last version before he severely pruned the discussion
405:
He then proceeded to constantly pester me on my talk page; so much, in fact, that I asked him to leave me alone (albeit a, *cough*, bit stronger than was perhaps necessary
999:
255:
139:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1143:
920:
I have worked with Evula in the past and have found that he is a very good editor who deserves to finally get some admin tools (that he will surely use well).
541:
So, that covers the "how did you deal with it?" portion. Future debates would really all depend on the situation; it has been more than once that I've gotten
2099:
763:
395:
402:. After our disagreements (for some crazy reason, I kept removing his unsourced/unverifiable claims. Silly me!), I suspected (and caught) him stalking me.
2117:
1219:
189:
159:
188:
also strikes me as something I'd be fairly good at (and enjoy). Once I'm more familiar with my mop (which I'll promptly name "Vera"), I'll give
169:
399:
1316:
Has made extensive excellent additions to the encyclopedia. Extremely civil, cordial and easy to work with. This seems like an easy call.
185:
1493:
From EVula, I've seen only good edits, conscientious efforts, strong awareness of
Knowledge policy, and dedication to Knowledge's goals.
1774:
963:
240:
767:
1913:
1601:
1387:
457:
294:
258:
for the project to standardize information across all the character articles (still a work in progress, though, and with the new
33:
17:
176:
to get protected, I had to revert more than a half-dozen vandal edits. If I can help protect pages faster, I'd be really happy.
894:
389:
151:
630:
377:
353:
290:
251:
1425:
1280:
979:
Nice, reasonable answers to questions. Though not really influencing my decision, that project logo is really good work.
795:
177:
119:
92:
even when they are written by a fairly experienced editor. If he accepts the nomination, i will give him a support vote.
1461:
587:
469:
However, Wesborland came in and started removing sources and adding unsourced (and poorly worded/formatted) information.
311:
1300:. I've come across him many times there as we worked together to promote/improve several articles there, as well as at
827:
82:
1164:
will show he has done a huge amount of work, and it's hard click on history for any MK page and not see his name. ~
228:
which included research to establish its notability (although researching a book about a girl who dies of cancer is
1317:
462:
385:
301:
147:
1431:
1407:
1333:
1091:
951:
756:
267:
180:, while fairly dull at the moment (just five) would also be a future haunt of mine (forgive the phrasing, but it
206:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1358:
1013:
771:
526:
213:
155:
1928:
720:
eyebrow goes up. With both eyebrows up, I have a "surprised" look on my face, which... isn't that interesting.
1869:
1525:
1479:
1208:
791:
530:
2026:
1999:
1166:
936:
318:
96:
817:
I'm thoroughly impressed. EVula looks like a great user who could surely do some good with the tools. --
1984:
1907:
1597:
1383:
1069:
1042:
2098:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1656:
122:. I'll answer the questions here, sure, but additional reading/telling information can be found there.
1592:
1584:
1378:
1370:
1062:. Great character, polite, refined sense of humor. Rare qualities that deserve my strongest support.--
933:
1757:
1402:
1329:
1148:
451:
93:
1680:
1615:
1587:
1412:
1373:
1301:
1232:
285:
1939:
No evidence this nominee will abuse the admin tools...I also had a similar run in with
Dreamguy.--
1889:
1949:
1864:
1738:
1518:
1494:
1241:
1216:
1134:
992:
440:(which is an interesting feat, given that I'd edited the article more than 24 hours before he did
347:
247:
2066:
2046:
2030:
2015:
2003:
1988:
1972:
1943:
1931:
1919:
1892:
1883:
1871:
1855:
1843:
1831:
1819:
1807:
1795:
1783:
1763:
1742:
1723:
1711:
1699:
1687:
1659:
1647:
1623:
1606:
1575:
1563:
1551:
1530:
1509:
1497:
1485:
1465:
1440:
1415:
1392:
1361:
1349:
1337:
1320:
1308:
1288:
1255:
1243:
1222:
1196:
1172:
1151:
1137:
1125:
1122:
1113:
1080:
1053:
1024:
983:
971:
939:
924:
906:
883:
868:
857:
848:
833:
821:
802:
774:
678:
What would your thought process be to determine that a business article should be deleted using
126:
112:
99:
2022:
1995:
1852:
1449:
1297:
1272:
1980:
1901:
1880:
1804:
1792:
1696:
1541:
1263:
per detailed answers to all of the questions. Loved your honest answer to aero's question --
1074:
1047:
581:
1644:
1620:
1612:
1560:
1437:
1252:
956:
948:
921:
892:
was on the air. The "EV" bit are my initials (although a lot of people thought it was for
876:
854:
841:
818:
447:
76:
898:, a game I've got extensive experience with), with "ula" tacked onto the end (there's a
221:
2063:
2043:
1668:
1109:
1018:
1008:
626:
603:
1147:
they are attempting to control and sensor the internet and remove peoples freedoms. ~
2111:
2059:
1733:
1546:
1538:
1453:
1237:
1213:
1205:
1190:
864:
799:
679:
615:
599:
480:
473:
343:
418:(as an aside, his userpage is a 99% reproduction of mine at the time, right down to
1708:
1264:
1161:
654:
522:
488:
446:
My third (and, to date, last) foray into the world of unpleasant dealings was with
250:, I've worked hard to remove unsourced fancruft from across numerous articles (see
342:
My first experience with the "pleasure" of wiki-disagreement came in the form of
2055:
1840:
1572:
1506:
1457:
1305:
1180:. Great editor, has done a lot of work on a variety of different WikiProjects.--
1064:
1037:
577:
511:
484:
173:
888:
Nope, sorry to disappoint. I've had "EVula" as my screenname since well before
262:
game being released recently, a lot of "unprocessed" additions have been made).
2092:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2012:
1940:
1828:
1816:
1751:
1640:
903:
752:
123:
109:
72:
62:
1357:
based upon answers given above and general attitude displayed, all positive.
1720:
1346:
1105:
980:
86:
1900:
per everyone above, seen him around and he seems like an excellent users.
1204:
You have to support after seeing what EVula has done for the MK articles.
633:
in most instances, so I don't think I would apply this to anything except
1182:
700:
The contributing editor — Subsequently broken down into two sub-criteria:
398:), an (in my opinion) off-kilter editor who I first tussled with over at
1695:
per nom, answers, comments above. Strong editor, no issues or concerns.
1121:
based on honest answers and a wealth of projects under his user page! --
546:
Knowledge entirely for a few hours each time he started pissing me off).
339:(I'm copying and slightly modifying my response from my editor review)
565:
Maniacal laughter is probably the wrong answer here, isn't it? Crap...
422:) He has recently come back, and appears to still be stalking my edits
89:
related articles, which i usually edit), and checks facts quite often
2102:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
361:
1611:
Whoops! You already added your support on 1 November (Support #26).
146:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
514:
set me straight about how I should behave in future altercations).
364:. His argument was that it was merely spam (and felt comfortable
172:. I realize it isn't on the backlog pages, but while waiting for
1791:. EVula seems a nice editor. He could be a nice administrator.--
65:
1090:. EVula is helpful and I trust him with administrator tools.
638:
106:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1731:. Seems to me like a user with his head in the right place.
1559:
Great editor who will be a good addition to the admin team.
853:
And I support your use of a Hubert J. Farnsworth quote. --
712:
research, I'd either submit an AfD or ignore the article).
637:
clear-cut instances (like if someone submitted an AfD for
1304:, and have no hesitation in supporting his nomination! --
902:
longer story to my username, but I won't get into here).
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1456:, I have nothing but positive experiences with EVula.--
2042:- Just in case this ends up being a close one. ; ) --
1636:
1296:
has always been very helpful in combatting fancruft at
534:
508:
506:
503:
496:
494:
492:
477:
470:
467:
441:
438:
428:
425:
423:
419:
416:
414:
412:
409:
406:
403:
373:
365:
277:
273:
265:
My earliest major contribution to the encyclopedia was
226:
90:
194:
Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism
212:
First and foremost, I've got a running commentary at
707:
Editing history – if the article in question is the
483:; this wasn't just a content dispute, he was adding
1803:. A friendly editor who is dedicated to wikipedia.
505:, who backed me up in my assessment of the article.
1851:He's a good Wikipedian who will make a good Admin.
225:from being deleted by rewriting the whole article,
1655:- bumped into this editor a while ago, all good!
472:The resultant edit war saw both of us violate
368:). Eventually, he started railing against the
317:to all the templates (that I could) listed on
1328:Nice and thoughtful person in my experience.
932:as nominator and per reasons listed before --
8:
1948:I think EVula would be helpful as an admin.
1345:Will do a good job with the mop and bucket.
1251:Good editor, works on several WikiProjects.
1230:No problems here. A great editor as well. --
606:mean to you and how would you apply them?
1202:Support, complete with maniacal laughter
562:Why do you want to be an administrator?
430:), even going so far as to suggest that
362:Zombie#Zombies in literature and fiction
192:some attention, as well as cleaning out
1827:. Seems to be reasonable and informed.
867:in the parallel universe as "Evula"? -
612:Breaking this down into the two parts:
653:Is there ever a case where a punitive
170:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
766:as of 23:33 October 31st 2006, using
553:Optional question from (aeropagitica)
479:). For this edit war, I have to cite
400:Talk:Vanderbilt University Law School
284:The rest of my edits are more of the
184:Halloween after all). Taking care of
168:Well, I'd like to spend some time at
118:Just a note: also of interest may be
7:
498:I even asked for help from a fellow
271:, which I expanded greatly (compare
186:Category:Images on Wikimedia Commons
384:My second editor conflict was with
1667:Trustworthy and experienced user.
24:
2118:Successful requests for adminship
1707:Everything seems to be in order.
295:Category:Okinawa geography stubs
216:. For specific items, though...
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1639:, and no other concerns here --
764:EVula's editcount summary stats
152:Category:Administrative backlog
1400:. Will not abuse the tools. --
768:Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool
297:, flagging every article with
291:Category:Kyoto geography stubs
1:
1160:. Just a quick glance at the
536:). Like I said, very minor...
517:Oh, I nearly forgot. I had a
178:Category:Requests for unblock
2067:17:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2047:17:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2031:07:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2016:05:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2004:05:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1989:01:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1973:11:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1944:11:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1932:20:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
1920:20:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
1893:19:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
1884:18:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
1879:- not that it's needed :) --
1872:15:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
1856:03:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
1844:20:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1832:20:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1820:19:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1808:10:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1796:09:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1784:07:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1764:05:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1743:03:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1724:02:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1712:02:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1700:01:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1688:22:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1660:19:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1648:16:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1624:00:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
1607:15:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1576:15:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1564:12:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1552:05:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1531:05:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
1510:20:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1498:18:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1486:17:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1466:15:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1441:14:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1429:Anyone who contributes to a
1416:11:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1393:07:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1362:07:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1350:05:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1338:04:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1321:04:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1309:03:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1289:02:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1256:01:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1244:01:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1223:01:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1197:01:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1173:00:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1152:00:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1138:00:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1126:00:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1114:00:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1081:03:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1054:23:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
1025:23:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
1007:. seems promising. Cheers --
1000:23:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
984:23:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
972:23:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
940:22:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
925:22:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
907:03:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
884:00:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
858:15:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
849:22:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
822:22:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
803:00:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
775:23:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
160:administrators' reading list
127:22:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
113:21:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
100:20:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
755:'s edit summary usage with
525:about periods in captions (
135:Questions for the candidate
2134:
1162:Mortal Kombat Wiki Project
716:appeared at AfD), then my
463:Mortal Kombat: Devastation
374:labeling it as non-notable
254:), and created a specific
154:, and read the page about
148:Category:Knowledge backlog
1432:The Zombie Survival Guide
527:my talk page conversation
268:The Zombie Survival Guide
248:absolutely fantastic logo
2095:Please do not modify it.
576:Optional questions from
531:the Caption conversation
487:information, some of it
214:User:EVula/Contributions
629:— Well, I happen to be
427:(which he's admitted to
378:the article's talk page
252:The Khameleon Konundrum
39:Please do not modify it
2011:late, don't worry. ;)
1929:Duke of Duchess Street
1719:keep up the good work
1094:23:49, 31 October 2006
1058:Actually, changing to
832:I support this RfA. -
688:My personal criteria:
598:What do the policy of
319:Template:TestTemplates
61:(62/0/0) Ended 22:00,
1318:Justinpwilsonadvocate
790:This user has had an
386:Justinpwilsonadvocate
376:(and refusing to use
366:labeling me a spammer
358:Zombie Survival Guide
34:request for adminship
521:minor argument with
1993:Late to the party!
794:which can be found
657:should be applied?
620:I recently cited it
312:TestTemplatesNotice
246:. I designed their
1635:- experience with
1079:
1052:
879:Happy Thanksgiving
828:Good news everyone
502:WikiProject member
1550:
1168:The Haunted Angel
1112:
1063:
1036:
489:original research
460:). The fledgling
302:WikiProject Japan
219:I recently saved
2125:
2097:
1969:
1967:
1965:
1963:
1961:
1867:
1782:
1781:
1779:
1762:
1685:
1678:
1673:
1618:
1590:
1549:
1544:
1528:
1523:
1410:
1405:
1376:
1285:
1277:
1269:
1240:
1235:
1211:
1193:
1185:
1169:
1108:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1021:
1016:
1011:
997:
969:
954:
881:
873:
846:
838:
746:General comments
316:
310:
306:
300:
280:
239:involved in the
120:my editor review
41:
2133:
2132:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2100:this nomination
2093:
1959:
1957:
1955:
1953:
1951:
1877:Pile-on Support
1865:
1775:
1773:
1772:
1756:
1681:
1674:
1669:
1616:
1605:
1588:
1542:
1526:
1519:
1484:
1476:
1473:. Looks good.
1464:
1408:
1403:
1391:
1374:
1343:Strong Support.
1330:Oleg Alexandrov
1281:
1273:
1265:
1233:
1231:
1209:
1191:
1189:
1183:
1167:
1149:trialsanderrors
1075:
1070:
1065:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1019:
1014:
1009:
993:
968:
960:
952:
947:-- why not? :)
895:Escape Velocity
877:
869:
842:
834:
631:fond of process
314:
308:
307:. I also added
304:
298:
272:
190:speedy deleting
55:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2131:
2129:
2121:
2120:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2104:
2088:
2087:
2079:
2078:
2070:
2069:
2049:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2020:As always! :p
1991:
1975:
1946:
1934:
1922:
1895:
1886:
1874:
1858:
1846:
1834:
1822:
1810:
1798:
1786:
1766:
1750:. I have seen
1745:
1726:
1714:
1702:
1690:
1662:
1650:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1595:
1566:
1554:
1533:
1517:- Okey-dokey.
1512:
1500:
1488:
1478:
1474:
1468:
1460:
1443:
1418:
1395:
1381:
1364:
1359:(aeropagitica)
1352:
1340:
1323:
1314:Strong Support
1311:
1291:
1258:
1246:
1225:
1199:
1187:
1175:
1154:
1140:
1128:
1116:
1095:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1060:Strong Support
1027:
1002:
986:
974:
962:
942:
927:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
844:Trick or Treat
824:
806:
805:
782:
781:
780:
772:(aeropagitica)
761:
760:
757:mathbot's tool
748:
747:
742:
740:
739:
738:
737:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
713:
702:
701:
698:
672:
671:
670:
669:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
624:
602:and the essay
573:
572:
571:
570:
566:
550:
549:
548:
547:
539:
538:
537:
515:
444:
382:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
282:
263:
233:
200:
199:
198:
197:
156:administrators
137:
136:
131:
116:
115:
54:
49:
47:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2130:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2113:
2103:
2101:
2096:
2090:
2089:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2045:
2041:
2038:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2024:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2014:
2010:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2002:
2001:
1997:
1992:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1979:
1976:
1974:
1971:
1970:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1927:per above. --
1926:
1923:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1904:
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1866:Mustafa Akalp
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1780:
1778:
1777:Doctor Bruno
1770:
1767:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1753:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1694:
1691:
1689:
1686:
1684:
1679:
1677:
1672:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1631:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1603:
1599:
1594:
1591:
1586:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1548:
1545:
1540:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1524:
1522:
1516:
1513:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:Shiny Support
1444:
1442:
1439:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1427:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1413:
1411:
1406:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1377:
1372:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1353:
1351:
1348:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1286:
1284:
1278:
1276:
1270:
1268:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1236:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1186:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1163:
1159:
1156:An undoubted
1155:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1135:Mailer Diablo
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
990:
987:
985:
982:
978:
975:
973:
967:
966:
958:
955:
950:
946:
943:
941:
938:
935:
931:
928:
926:
923:
919:
916:
908:
905:
901:
897:
896:
891:
887:
886:
885:
882:
880:
874:
872:
866:
865:Turanga Leela
861:
860:
859:
856:
852:
851:
850:
847:
845:
839:
837:
831:
829:
825:
823:
820:
816:
813:
812:
811:
810:
804:
801:
797:
793:
792:editor review
789:
788:
787:
786:
779:
778:
777:
776:
773:
769:
765:
758:
754:
750:
749:
745:
744:
743:
735:
730:
726:
719:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
690:
689:
687:
684:
683:
681:
677:
674:
673:
667:
662:
659:
658:
656:
652:
649:
648:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
621:
617:
614:
613:
611:
608:
607:
605:
601:
597:
594:
593:
592:
591:
589:
586:
583:
579:
567:
564:
563:
561:
558:
557:
556:
554:
544:
540:
535:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
509:
507:
504:
501:
500:Mortal Kombat
497:
495:
493:
490:
486:
482:
478:
475:
471:
468:
465:
464:
459:
456:
453:
449:
445:
442:
439:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
421:
420:using my name
417:
415:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
397:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
349:
345:
341:
340:
338:
335:
334:
332:
329:
328:
320:
313:
303:
296:
292:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
269:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
243:
242:Mortal Kombat
238:
234:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:Hannah's Gift
218:
217:
215:
211:
208:
207:
205:
202:
201:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
163:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
141:
140:
134:
133:
132:
129:
128:
125:
121:
114:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
81:
78:
74:
70:
69:
67:
64:
59:
53:
50:
48:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2094:
2091:
2081:
2080:
2072:
2071:
2051:
2039:
2021:
2008:
1994:
1977:
1950:
1936:
1924:
1914:
1908:
1902:
1897:
1876:
1860:
1853:Sharkface217
1848:
1836:
1824:
1812:
1800:
1788:
1776:
1768:
1758:
1747:
1732:
1728:
1716:
1704:
1692:
1682:
1675:
1670:
1664:
1657:Budgiekiller
1652:
1632:
1580:
1568:
1556:
1535:
1520:
1514:
1502:
1490:
1480:
1470:
1445:
1430:
1424:
1420:
1409:Kamalabadi?!
1401:
1397:
1366:
1354:
1342:
1325:
1313:
1302:WP:BIOGRAPHY
1293:
1282:
1274:
1266:
1260:
1248:
1227:
1201:
1181:
1177:
1165:
1157:
1142:
1130:
1118:
1102:
1098:
1087:
1059:
1035:Knowledge.--
1030:
1029:
1004:
995:Rama's arrow
994:
991:looks good.
988:
976:
964:
944:
929:
917:
899:
893:
889:
878:
870:
843:
835:
826:
814:
808:
807:
784:
783:
762:
741:
733:
728:
717:
708:
693:
685:
675:
665:
660:
650:
634:
609:
595:
584:
575:
574:
559:
552:
551:
542:
518:
499:
485:unverifiable
461:
454:
435:
431:
392:
369:
357:
350:
336:
330:
266:
259:
241:
236:
232:depressing).
229:
220:
209:
203:
181:
165:
143:
138:
130:
117:
105:
79:
71:
60:
57:
56:
51:
46:
38:
30:
28:
2009:Fashionably
1981:Sarah Ewart
1903:Michaelas10
1881:Doc Tropics
1805:Englishrose
1793:Yannismarou
1771:per above.
1697:Newyorkbrad
1571:per above.
1294:Definitely!
1092:Yamaguchi先生
256:style guide
244:WikiProject
174:Freakazoid!
1759:Satori Son
1561:NawlinWiki
1450:WP:FIREFLY
1438:MJCdetroit
1426:Holy Shit!
1298:WP:FIREFLY
1253:Hello32020
934:Raffaello9
922:Cbrown1023
855:Kicking222
819:Kicking222
785:Discussion
448:Wesborland
108:I accept.
94:Raffaello9
63:7 November
31:successful
2064:Isotope23
2044:cholmes75
1839:per nom.
1097:Lets all
734:extremely
697:criteria:
543:extremely
434:stalking
372:article,
286:WikiGnome
87:Star Wars
2112:Category
1863:per nom.
1613:DarthVad
1521:Krakatoa
1491:Support.
1448:In both
1326:Support.
1283:Contribs
890:Futurama
800:ReyBrujo
623:further.
588:contribs
458:contribs
396:contribs
354:contribs
344:DreamGuy
230:horribly
158:and the
83:contribs
2082:Neutral
2052:Support
2040:Support
1978:Support
1937:Support
1925:Support
1898:Support
1890:W.marsh
1861:Support
1849:Support
1841:Michael
1837:Support
1825:Support
1813:Support
1801:Support
1789:Support
1769:Support
1748:Support
1729:Support
1717:support
1709:JoshuaZ
1705:Support
1693:Support
1665:Support
1653:Support
1633:Support
1593:nce Ong
1581:Support
1569:Support
1557:Support
1536:Support
1515:Support
1503:Support
1471:Support
1421:Support
1398:Support
1379:nce Ong
1367:Support
1355:Support
1267:Ageo020
1261:Support
1249:Support
1238:iva1979
1228:Support
1178:Support
1158:support
1144:Oh, no!
1131:Support
1119:Support
1103:Support
1101:--er...
1088:Support
1031:Support
1005:Support
989:Support
977:Support
949:Daveydw
945:Support
930:Support
918:Support
815:Support
809:Support
680:CSD:G11
627:WP:SNOW
604:WP:SNOW
523:Kaldari
2073:Oppose
2060:WP:NOR
2027:dzasta
2000:dzasta
1829:Jayjg
1637:images
1573:Addhoc
1539:Dfrg.m
1507:Tawker
1495:Wryspy
1458:danntm
1454:WP:AFD
1404:¿¡Exir
1306:plange
1099:discov
616:WP:IAR
600:WP:IAR
578:Malber
512:Husond
481:WP:IAR
474:WP:3RR
381:while.
274:before
2023:riana
2013:EVula
1996:riana
1952:: -->
1941:MONGO
1817:A. B.
1752:EVula
1734:Andre
1527:Katie
1192:talk?
1123:Steve
965:patch
904:EVula
798:. --
753:EVula
718:right
666:ample
655:block
278:after
124:EVula
110:EVula
73:EVula
68:(UTC)
58:Final
52:EVula
16:<
2056:WP:V
1985:Talk
1968:<
1739:talk
1721:Mjal
1671:Nish
1481:talk
1452:and
1347:Jcam
1334:talk
1275:Talk
1206:ςפקι
1133:. -
1110:Talk
1106:ST47
981:Dina
937:Talk
900:much
871:Mike
836:Mike
796:here
751:See
709:only
635:very
582:talk
529:and
519:very
452:talk
390:talk
348:talk
293:and
276:and
237:very
235:I'm
150:and
97:Talk
77:talk
66:2006
2062:.--
1755:--
1676:kid
1645:rex
1585:Ter
1505:--
1423:.
1371:Ter
1214:Иτς
1184:TBC
1066:Hús
1039:Hús
729:not
694:far
639:Sex
436:him
432:I'm
370:ZSG
360:to
2114::
1987:)
1918:)
1888:--
1741:)
1683:64
1600:|
1583:--
1477:/
1386:|
1369:--
1336:)
1287:)
1279:•
1076:nd
1049:nd
1023:•
1010:Ch
970:)
953:ee
875:|
840:|
770:.
686:A:
682:?
676:7.
661:A:
651:6.
641:).
610:A:
596:5.
560:4.
555::
443:).
337:A:
331:3.
315:}}
309:{{
305:}}
299:{{
260:MK
210:A:
204:2.
182:is
166:A:
162:.
144:1.
36:.
2058:/
2025:_
1998:_
1983:(
1966:t
1964:n
1962:a
1960:i
1958:d
1956:a
1954:R
1915:C
1912:|
1909:T
1906:(
1737:(
1643:-
1641:T
1621:r
1617:e
1604:)
1602:C
1598:T
1596:(
1589:e
1547:c
1543:s
1475:└
1462:C
1436:—
1390:)
1388:C
1384:T
1382:(
1375:e
1332:(
1271:(
1234:S
1220:☻
1217:☺
1210:Д
1188:Φ
1071:ö
1044:ö
1020:z
1015:e
961:/
959:(
957:b
830:!
759:.
590:)
585:·
580:(
455:·
450:(
408:/
393:·
388:(
351:·
346:(
196:.
80:·
75:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.