146:
edited for at least a year or more, to be the prevailing factors in this RfA that might encourage voters to support because my content and counter-vandalism contributions might appear as being greater and more significant than my amateurish and below-average history. My AfD record is a bit weak for now but I promise to contribute more in the coming years, although I regularly nominate articles for deletion. As for my choice of username, I've seen admins with more peculiar username so I'm hoping this wouldn't be an issue.
253:
promotional pages. The username department is another I would like assist but my participation there might be lower than the others because usernames don't matter too much (to me) unless they're grossly degrading or blatantly promotional. My approach on notability is to see if there is significant coverage on Google (for topics like musicians and bands) and would consider at least three reliable sources that discuss the subject significantly as passing the
1160:
of the threat that FWTH understood/portrayed it to be. Shockingly, FWTH completely ignored Tony's good faith explanation, and did not amend their opposition in any way, despite continuing to actively edit. I even called FWTH out specifically for this and pinged them, and they still refused to retract
370:
matter regarding Calvin Harris and for sockpuppetry but they're in the past now and will not be repeated. I tend to avoid arguments/disputes and I often try not to escalate situation by ignoring/avoiding the issue. In the future, I will be more level-headed and resolve an issue amicably by discussion.
252:
is also another area I intend to work in. Some editors say anti-vandalism work is "easy" but I believe this area's what keeping
Knowledge in tact, alongside content creation. In addition to that, I also intend to help out at the important speedy backlogs, deleting attack, vandalism, spam, copyvio and
162:
Please give me a chance because I'd surely do a much better job at adminning than many of the current admins (according to XTools, there are about 300 admins with a log of less than 50 admin actions and just ~100 admins have made more than 10 blocks), this might come off to many as being arrogant but
1076:
The block log on
English Knowledge is concerning and would be a red flag on its own. The primary reason for my oppose however is the block on Zawl on Commons for Intimidation/Harassment and the subsequent evasion of that block (for which I have blocked). The comments that resulted in Zawl's block on
369:
There is one editor in particular with whom I've had a long-term dispute regarding redirects and authorship credits but I do not consider it as causing stress although it has had a slight influence on my decision to take a fresh start. I've been blocked for edit warring two years ago over a trivial
145:
of new admins and some editors even suggested the idea of giving out adminship on a voluntary basis like in the late 2000s, which I'm hoping would happen here. I'm counting on the facts that being admin on
Knowledge isn't a big deal and requesting for adminship should made easier for editors who've
153:
ended badly but it was mostly to do with my tenure as most of the editors who commented thought I'm a cookie but I am confident they would've given a better rating had they known of my editing since 2016. While my use of software has brought me an excessive amount of automated edits, my edit count
1077:
Commons were (correctly) deleted so I won't repeat them here, but they consisted of a series of homophobic epithets being directed at a fellow administrator on
Commons. I see little evidence that their behaviour has improved significantly from that of October 2016 in any case.
790:
with a rationale of "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia". That you ignored the ORCP who said "don't run, you won't pass" and that you frame adminship in terms of how quickly you can hit the block button, suggests your temperament is completely unsuitable.
154:
doesn't mean anything. I can be that guy who works on music charts manually to rack up 200,000 edits without any automation but the stats don't mean anything much if they're not evaluated properly. I hope the bigger picture is looked at, that I'm here to be
158:
and not to hat-collect or boost my ego. I'm hoping against all odds to become the youngest
Knowledge admin of all time and one of the only admins in the electronic music field, and have a landmark RfA that would forever change the way this process is done.
1305:, largely per the comments of Ritchie above. Furthermore, I took a look at a couple of the candidate's "best contributions" mentioned in question two and became concerned about copyright violations (both copying and very close paraphrasing). For example,
762:
Flooded with them hundreds agrees "to no longer move pages related to songs, music, or discography without first obtaining consensus (be it a talk page/WikiProject discussion, RM, or something else)". Should this be breached, PGM will be removed
464:
150:
1440:
685:
310:
680:
1226:
386:
per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
1009:
I usually wait until a candidate answers my question. However, Ritchie333 stole the words out of my mouth. I can not support someone who was blocked more than once in the past 2-3 years. --
379:
528:
541:
535:
90:
1288:
largely per everyone else here but also I cannot support someone who has made such egregious and blatant personal attacks as this user (under their various accounts.)
595:
521:
363:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
86:
675:
701:
1458:
1127:
I don't believe you have the maturity to be an admin. Also I cannot support a candidate who, as
Galobtter notes, is currently under an editing restriction.--
281:
My best contributions to
Knowledge are my article creations, counter-vandalism activity with Huggle, AfC reviewing, article mergers and many more listed at
1229:
under an old username, an editing restriction. I don't really think what's presented as a reason for giving you the tools outweighs the risk we'd incur.
1314:
163:
I'm just being honest and looking to become admin the right way because I'm so eager to contribute more to
Knowledge with a greater technical capacity.
711:
1405:
285:(I've not updated the list since August but I plan to, some time later). My content contributions include writing the lead sections in discographies (
1188:
your RFA would be unsucessful so why the hell run ? ..., As noted above your block log is a major concern as is your page mover rights revocation. –
1156:
with a perfectly reasonable explanation that FWTH had completely misunderstood the point he was trying to convey, which was actually meant to be the
571:
565:
223:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
421:
Please list all of your previous accounts, renames, permitted/un-permitted socks and detail your past RfA attempts here and on any other project.
649:
580:
400:
Thank you for volunteering. Do you think you could explain a little further why you decided to abandon your previous account earlier this year?
1317:
670:
623:
248:
because apparently many editors dislike "minors" overseeing their case or getting into something like that (I'm 16 years old if it matters).
142:
1185:
665:
515:
204:
175:
80:
110:. I have created over ~500 articles and 100 categories although I don't have any good or featured articles. My best content work might be
1148:, in which they opposed an (ultimately successful) CU candidate, in part over an alleged unjust threat to block them. The CU candidate,
1111:
853:
account, as is disclosed in the first sentence of the self nom. The FWTH account has a clean block log, but the other account doesn't.
765:) is already a deal-breaker, because page mover rights are far less sensitive than admin rights and are (obviously) bundled with them.
1153:
644:
330:
240:. Blocking vandals and deleting spam pages would be the main tasks for me if I become an admin. I would stay away from disputes and
467:"I don't plan to run for adminship until at least mid-2020 or later", yet you self-nominate less than a month later. What changed?
489:
282:
1386:
1238:
967:
799:
30:
17:
1394:
1345:
511:
334:
194:
165:
76:
1423:
1388:
1357:
1328:
1297:
1280:
1263:
1242:
1217:
1201:
1176:
1136:
1115:
1086:
1068:
1052:
1035:
1018:
987:
971:
945:
931:
911:
893:
864:
837:
801:
774:
741:
706:
488:
Can you list all current and previous accounts you've used? There seem to be quite a few, and not all of them are listed on
212:
183:
89:) – With over 65,000 edits in total from both accounts I've used, I began editing Knowledge in March 2016 and first ran for
65:
1414:
757:
262:
1324:
826:
920:, which is fine. I'm opposing here but I don't think this particular point should be held against the candidate.
616:
290:
119:
1398:
1026:
the block log and your comments above do not demonstrate the maturity and good judgement required of admins.
1132:
1104:
955:
1336:
per all the arguments already mentioned, as well as the bad impression I got from your attempt to have me
1320:
286:
127:
1393:
Seconded. I'm sure this is well-intentioned, but it's also gone past the point of usefulness. Thanks to
1276:
1094:
I'm sorry. I know you probably did this to get RfA active, but I oppose per reasons above and, overall,
917:
1439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1031:
732:- We do indeed need admins. Thanks for throwing your hat in, and all your work improving Knowledge! —
1384:
1353:
1293:
1234:
1162:
963:
941:
907:
797:
609:
135:
936:
Well except for the fact that they've socked elsewhere in the last month on a sister project, so...
770:
734:
455:
1337:
1259:
1145:
1128:
1100:
871:
591:
350:
61:
1341:
1149:
1014:
346:
134:
topics. In
February this year, I abandoned the Zawl account to return a few weeks later as a
1348:). I don't mind an admin being 16, we have had younger; I do want an admin to act maturely.
1272:
1095:
1048:
1043:
From what I've read so far, this user lacks the maturity needed to be trusted with the mop.
1027:
878:
844:
831:
302:
131:
115:
1379:
1350:
1289:
1230:
1171:
982:
959:
937:
926:
903:
859:
810:
792:
480:
1161:
or amend their comment, or even respond. That was pretty low, even in the context of the
1375:
1189:
1082:
891:
820:
766:
306:
249:
155:
102:
54:
1452:
1310:
1255:
1215:
786:. The highlight for me is on 22 October 2016, where you were blocked indefinitely by
338:
322:
298:
254:
245:
237:
111:
57:
442:
What area or areas of the English Knowledge do you find yourself to be the weakest?
1010:
434:
342:
314:
258:
241:
1225:
Block log is concerning, apparently there's a history of public attacks, multiple
916:
They're not using both, they abandoned the old account and started a new one as a
883:
if you read the first sentence of the nomination statement it will become clear.
1061:
1044:
326:
1166:
977:
921:
854:
787:
318:
294:
123:
1433:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1397:
for the offer though: and remember, not now does not never ever mean never!
1078:
885:
816:
413:
95:
1123:
You say you're not doing this to boost your ego and yet you want it to be
1210:
1209:
Per Swarm, and evading the commons block as recently as a few weeks ago.
1144:
per concerns about reasonableness and good faith after their comments at
392:
1125:
a landmark RfA that would forever change the way this process is done.
1443:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
760:
eight months ago, and that there are restrictions on your use of it (
1378:. I think we're past the point of any more criticism being helpful.
594:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
601:
902:
Which begs the question why exactly one needs so many accounts...
490:
User:Flooded with them hundreds/fingerwaffle#Alternative accounts
130:. In my early days on Knowledge, I made contributions mostly to
605:
578:
Edit summary usage for Flooded with them hundreds can be found
1165:
party that was going on there. Sorry, it's a firm no from me.
190:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
275:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?
230:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
53:
Final (1/18/0); ended 20:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC) per
1306:
1251:
783:
559:
553:
547:
1319:, and was added to the article by ReZawler and Zawl.
1227:
sockpuppet investigations resulting in blocked socks
694:
658:
637:
378:You may ask optional questions below. There is a
313:), creating articles about electronic musicians (
141:I'm requesting because I heard the community is
756:Unfortunately no. That your page mover rights
617:
8:
283:User:Flooded with them hundreds/housekeeping
236:My main focus in the administrative area is
624:
610:
602:
590:Please keep discussion constructive and
1124:
761:
509:Links for Flooded with them hundreds:
305:), awards & nominations section (
7:
1374:Could somebody please close this as
1313:was copied/closely paraphrased from
1254:and all other valid reasons above. –
1186:You were told just under a month ago
1459:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
950:They've also had multiple SPIs on
24:
782:I'm not supporting anyone with a
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1395:User:Flooded with them hundreds
293:, etc), the main content/body (
976:Yeah, I see I was wrong here.
958:) resulting in blocked socks.
1:
1146:WP:CUOS2018#TonyBallioni (CU)
815:Why the diff above points to
265:'s perspective on the matter.
1424:20:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1389:20:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1358:20:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1329:20:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1298:20:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1281:20:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1264:20:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1243:20:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1218:20:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1202:20:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1177:20:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1154:responded at their talk page
1137:20:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1116:20:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1087:20:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1069:20:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1053:20:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1036:20:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
1019:20:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
988:20:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
972:20:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
946:20:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
932:20:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
912:20:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
894:20:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
865:20:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
838:20:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
802:19:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
775:19:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
742:20:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
213:19:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
184:19:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
66:20:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
219:Questions for the candidate
1475:
512:Flooded with them hundreds
77:Flooded with them hundreds
47:Flooded with them hundreds
479:Additional question from
454:Additional question from
433:Additional question from
412:Additional question from
391:Additional question from
120:Martin Garrix discography
93:on December 31, 2016, as
1436:Please do not modify it.
849:Zawl is the candidate's
39:Please do not modify it.
1340:for you in a feud with
1060:per all of the above.
956:User:TheMagnificentist
128:Marshmello discography
1184:per everyone above -
345:) and record labels (
31:request for adminship
829:)'s contributions?--
707:Global contributions
784:block log like this
671:Non-automated edits
261:, I tend to follow
650:Edit summary usage
598:before commenting.
351:Future House Music
311:Chloë Grace Moretz
40:
1321:Thine Antique Pen
875:
720:
719:
596:his contributions
347:NoCopyrightSounds
202:
173:
38:
1466:
1438:
1421:
1412:
1403:
1369:General comments
1213:
1199:
1194:
1174:
1169:
1114:
1066:
985:
980:
929:
924:
888:
882:
869:
862:
857:
848:
814:
739:
737:
666:Articles created
626:
619:
612:
603:
583:
575:
534:
387:
303:The Chainsmokers
200:
171:
132:electronic music
116:The Chainsmokers
109:
107:
100:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1441:this nomination
1434:
1415:
1406:
1399:
1371:
1366:
1211:
1195:
1190:
1172:
1167:
1108:
1099:
1062:
983:
978:
927:
922:
886:
876:
860:
855:
842:
808:
750:
735:
733:
726:
721:
716:
690:
654:
633:
632:RfA/RfB toolbox
630:
579:
527:
510:
506:
463:On October 11,
377:
335:Head Over Heels
331:Bearthday Music
221:
103:
96:
94:
74:
50:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1472:
1470:
1462:
1461:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1331:
1300:
1283:
1266:
1245:
1220:
1204:
1179:
1139:
1118:
1106:
1089:
1071:
1055:
1038:
1021:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
954:old username (
918:WP:Clean start
897:
896:
867:
840:
777:
749:
746:
745:
744:
736:Rhododendrites
725:
722:
718:
717:
715:
714:
709:
704:
698:
696:
692:
691:
689:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
662:
660:
656:
655:
653:
652:
647:
641:
639:
635:
634:
631:
629:
628:
621:
614:
606:
587:
586:
585:
576:
505:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
483:
476:
475:
474:
473:
458:
456:Argento Surfer
451:
450:
449:
448:
437:
430:
429:
428:
427:
416:
409:
408:
407:
406:
395:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
357:
356:
355:
354:
307:Richard Ayoade
269:
268:
267:
266:
220:
217:
216:
215:
73:
70:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1471:
1460:
1457:
1456:
1454:
1444:
1442:
1437:
1431:
1430:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1419:
1413:
1411:
1410:
1404:
1402:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1383:
1382:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1352:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1311:Martin Garrix
1308:
1307:this material
1304:
1301:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1193:
1187:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1175:
1170:
1164:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:Pawnkingthree
1126:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1103:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
989:
986:
981:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:
933:
930:
925:
919:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
898:
895:
892:
890:
889:
880:
873:
872:edit conflict
868:
866:
863:
858:
852:
846:
841:
839:
836:
834:
833:
828:
825:
822:
818:
812:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
800:
798:
796:
795:
789:
785:
781:
778:
776:
772:
768:
764:
759:
755:
752:
751:
747:
743:
738:
731:
730:Moral Support
728:
727:
723:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
699:
697:
693:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
663:
661:
657:
651:
648:
646:
643:
642:
640:
636:
627:
622:
620:
615:
613:
608:
607:
604:
600:
599:
597:
593:
582:
577:
573:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
533:
530:
526:
523:
520:
517:
513:
508:
507:
503:
497:
494:
493:
491:
487:
484:
482:
478:
477:
472:
469:
468:
466:
462:
459:
457:
453:
452:
447:
444:
443:
441:
438:
436:
432:
431:
426:
423:
422:
420:
417:
415:
411:
410:
405:
402:
401:
399:
396:
394:
390:
389:
388:
385:
384:two questions
381:
368:
365:
364:
362:
359:
358:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:Wrld on Drugs
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:Martin Garrix
296:
292:
291:Martin Garrix
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
274:
271:
270:
264:
260:
256:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
229:
226:
225:
224:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
203:
198:
197:
191:
188:
187:
186:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
174:
169:
168:
160:
157:
152:
147:
144:
139:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:Martin Garrix
108:
106:
101:
99:
92:
88:
85:
82:
78:
71:
69:
68:
67:
63:
59:
56:
48:
45:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1435:
1432:
1417:
1416:
1409:SerialNumber
1408:
1407:
1400:
1380:
1349:
1333:
1302:
1285:
1268:
1247:
1222:
1206:
1196:
1191:
1181:
1157:
1150:TonyBallioni
1141:
1120:
1105:
1101:
1091:
1073:
1063:
1057:
1040:
1023:
1006:
951:
884:
850:
835:
830:
823:
793:
779:
758:were revoked
753:
729:
589:
588:
568:
562:
556:
550:
544:
538:
531:
524:
518:
495:
485:
470:
460:
445:
439:
424:
418:
403:
397:
383:
376:
366:
360:
343:High on Life
315:Andrew Bayer
278:
272:
233:
227:
222:
206:
205:
199:
195:
193:
189:
177:
176:
170:
166:
164:
161:
148:
140:
104:
97:
83:
75:
52:
51:
46:
34:
28:
1338:WP:PROXYING
1273:Simon Adler
879:Jetstreamer
845:Jetstreamer
832:Jetstreamer
712:User rights
702:CentralAuth
329:), albums (
136:clean start
1381:Ritchie333
1290:Praxidicae
1231:cymru.lass
960:cymru.lass
938:Praxidicae
904:Praxidicae
811:Ritchie333
794:Ritchie333
695:Cross-wiki
686:AfD closes
504:Discussion
481:Cymru.lass
341:), songs (
319:Marshmello
295:Marshmello
287:Marshmello
201:with them
192:I accept.
172:with them
149:My recent
124:Marshmello
72:Nomination
1346:permalink
1163:aspersion
1107:Hypercube
1096:WP:NOTNOW
771:pingĂł miĂł
767:Galobtter
681:AfD votes
676:BLP edits
554:block log
257:. As for
91:adminship
1453:Category
1271:No way.
1256:Ammarpad
1239:contribs
1158:opposite
1028:Catrìona
968:contribs
827:contribs
659:Analysis
638:Counters
522:contribs
465:you said
321:), DJs (
207:hundreds
196:Flooded
178:hundreds
167:Flooded
151:RFA poll
87:contribs
58:zchrykng
1376:WP:SNOW
1364:Neutral
1011:Dolotta
952:another
724:Support
529:deleted
435:Dolotta
323:Slander
250:WP:RFPP
143:in need
55:WP:SNOW
1354:Sailor
1334:Oppose
1303:Oppose
1286:Oppose
1269:Oppose
1248:Oppose
1223:Oppose
1207:Oppose
1182:Oppose
1168:Swarm
1142:Oppose
1121:Oppose
1092:Oppose
1074:Oppose
1064:Nihlus
1058:Oppose
1045:JMHamo
1041:Oppose
1024:Oppose
1007:Oppose
979:Swarm
923:Swarm
856:Swarm
780:Oppose
763:again.
754:Oppose
748:Oppose
645:XTools
327:Getter
246:WP:ANI
238:WP:AIV
1418:54129
1342:Ss112
1192:Davey
1173:talk
984:talk
928:talk
861:talk
851:other
788:Bbb23
592:civil
536:count
380:limit
263:SoWhy
259:WP:A7
242:WP:AN
33:that
16:<
1325:talk
1316:and
1294:talk
1277:talk
1260:talk
1252:this
1250:per
1235:talk
1197:2010
1133:talk
1083:talk
1079:Nick
1049:talk
1032:talk
1015:talk
964:talk
942:talk
908:talk
887:Mkdw
821:talk
817:Zawl
581:here
566:rfar
548:logs
516:talk
414:Nick
156:here
126:and
81:talk
62:talk
1351:Sam
1309:in
1212:SQL
740:\\
572:spi
542:AfD
393:Mz7
382:of
255:GNG
1455::
1401:——
1327:)
1296:)
1279:)
1262:)
1241:)
1237:•
1152:,
1135:)
1098:.
1085:)
1051:)
1034:)
1017:)
970:)
966:•
944:)
910:)
773:)
560:lu
496:A:
492:.
486:8.
471:A:
461:7.
446:A:
440:6.
425:A:
419:5.
404:A:
398:4.
367:A:
361:3.
353:).
349:,
337:,
333:,
325:,
317:,
309:,
301:,
297:,
289:,
279:A:
273:2.
234:A:
228:1.
138:.
122:,
118:,
114:,
105:wl
98:Za
64:)
37:.
1344:(
1323:(
1292:(
1275:(
1258:(
1233:(
1131:(
1112:✎
1081:(
1047:(
1030:(
1013:(
962:(
940:(
906:(
881::
877:@
874:)
870:(
847::
843:@
824:·
819:(
813::
809:@
769:(
625:e
618:t
611:v
584:.
574:)
569:·
563:·
557:·
551:·
545:·
539:·
532:·
525:·
519:·
514:(
244:/
84:·
79:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.