Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/LuK3 2

287:

addition, as a member of the Volunteer Response Team, I often have to work with readers who are not aware of the full list of Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines and their intricacies. When dealing with tickets, I always try to explain these policies and guidelines in a non-judgemental and neutral way so readers have a better view on how Knowledge (XXG) operates. I never try to let on-wiki disputes or attacks affect me personally. At the end of the day, we are all here to build an encyclopedia and having ill-feelings or a negative attitude will only cause consequences which might reflect in my editing.

120:

Among the contributions that he’s made that aren’t as visible on Knowledge (XXG) itself, LuK3 is a 9-year member of the ACC team, processing over 1,000 requests, and in just the last year he has submitted over 75 requests for suppression to the oversight queue (a small portion of his total revdel requests). The broadness of his experience will make him a more empathetic administrator when working with editors in every corner of the project; the depth of his experience will no doubt make him a particularly productive administrator, with no end of tasks in sight.

93:) – Today it’s my honor to nominate LuK3 (not to be confused with Luk3) for adminship. LuK3 first came to my attention as the guy who was asking for revdel multiple times a day on IRC. Wouldn’t it be easier, I thought, if we just gave him the toolset so he could perform those revision deletions himself? The answer is yes and I think LuK3 has more than shown himself ready over the past 12 months to be an asset to the community not only with revdel but other parts of counter-vandalism patrolling including page protection and handling blocks. 100:. LuK3 has also participated in other areas of the project including third opinions and as a member of the volunteer response team (OTRS). His is a calm presence and one that remains ever open to feedback. You can see evidence of this in the various ways he has improved himself in the last 8 years since his first RfA. He is someone I expect to continue helping our readers and editors in a number of ways in the months and years to come. I hope you will join me in supporting his candidacy. Best, 1020:

have declined a couple of his revdel requests as not quite bad enough to merit deletion, but that's an area where we'd rather someone ask if they're unsure. As such, he has clearly demonstrated his need for the tools and competence in those areas. On the personality side, LuK3 is level-headed and unfailingly polite. He will be a solid addition to the admin corps.

228:. I find myself in the revdelete IRC channel quite often asking for revision deletions, so having the tools to deal with those problematic edits would be extremely beneficial. In addition, I have prior experience in speedy deletion so that is an area I would like to work in as well. Those are the areas in which I would participate in as an administrator. 1379: 517:. It is always good for an editor, especially new editors, to improve an abandoned draft or AFC submission for possible publication. Lending out a helping hand to new editors and assuming good faith is extremely important to editor retention and making Knowledge (XXG) a pleasant place to edit and participate. -- 1497:

as one of LuK3's "revdel bitches" I can say hand on heart (rumours I don't have one being unsubstantiated) that they've got the necessary experience, skill and expertise in understanding what to delete, what to keep and what to get a second opinion on. I went through their contributions and looked at

512:

All editors, not just administrators, should have a hand in assisting and welcoming new editors. As stated in my answer to question 3, I always try to explain Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines in an easy to understand way. One administrative area to help and assist new and inexperienced editors

244:

I believe my best contributions are my anti-vandalism and janitorial work. While not the prettiest or glamorous work, keeping articles clean and free of disruptive material is an essential part of the project. With more than 7 years of fighting vandalism, I believe I have the knowledge to help out in

552:

You've been made an admin (congratulations!) and you're closing AfDs that are over seven days old. You come upon one where the nominator simply says "This should be deleted", and there are 10 Keep !votes which are saying "No, it shouldn't", "Keep it", "No harm", "I like it," etc. And you look at the

431:

Most of my work on that article to bring it to Good Article status involved small changes (copyediting, reference/source changes, etc.) and not large content additions. I did not feel it was right to list that article because I was not one of the editors to significantly contribute to the prose. --

3719:

low article creation and main space participation. High delete !votes at AfD and many speedy noms. The only thing that kept me from opposing at this time was the fact that the AfD !votes are not just drive-by. My criteria for an administrator involve protecting content and content creators and I am

286:

I have been in a few edit disputes over the course of my Knowledge (XXG) career. Some are editors who I either reverted or tagged their article for speedy deletion. I am a firm believer in assuming good faith and always try to help editors and guide them to make constructive edits in the future. In

123:

What is, in my view, equally as impressive as LuK3's contribution history is his sheer kindness and patience in interacting with others. During the time that I’ve been following his work, LuK3 has exuded a calmness and good temperament that has impressed me. LuK3 doesn't cause trouble and possesses

3197:

I usually have a feeling for RfA candidates, recognising names &c., but here i have no idea if i have run across the candidate previously, i'm confused by the similarity with at least one other user. Regardless, i am contented by all i read that giving out the mop here is the correct thing to

2711:

I trust the conominator, and if they can trust that LuK3 can be trusted with the tools I can too. Furthermore, I see no issues which would lead me to oppose. One of the arguments made by the neutrals are that they have had editing hiatuses. I would counter that real life happens, so having editing

1019:

Definite support from me. I actually asked LuK3 a couple months ago whether anyone had talked to him about doing an RfA. He shows up frequently in the admin areas I watch (UAA, RfPP, CSD, and revdel requests on IRC). More importantly, his requests in those places are almost always correct - I may

667:

This question is on BLP (biography of living person). Important personalities from remote areas of a country experience significantly less and different media coverage than their other places' counterparts. Eventually, they are viewed as less significant. What's your view on this? Do you have any

3939:, re 'delete bias' I suspect that LuK3 shows up at AfD the same way I do - either they're nominating or they find a page already nominated for deletion while patrolling and decided to chime in. That usually leads to an editor's stats favoring "delete" (as opposed to people who show up at AfD via 119:

Anyone who has worked with LuK3 is familiar with his industriousness and dedication to the project. As my colleague Barkeep49 has discussed, LuK3's project experience is broad and deep; his contribution history spans Featured and Good content creation and extensive behind-the-scenes maintenance.

3868:

Any one of the admin corps could take a long break right now without warning or explanation. That's just how things go. I think a year of constant editing is more than enough to show that LuK3 is at least actively engaged right now (and so isn't likely to disappear right after getting the bit).

570:

Articles for deletion is not a straight vote process. In this situation, I would participate in the deletion discussion and base my argument in the applicable policies and guidelines. Since all of the keep !votes, in addition to the nominator statement, do not cite or reference any policies and

2670:

I've run into LuK3 quite a few times "behind the scenes" at ACC and OTRS. From what I've seen, he handles those extra buttons carefully and well and has been open and responsive to discussion about his actions when I've had occasion to do so. No doubt that will continue to the admin buttons.

3734:

WRT AfD participation, I don't think it is fair to judge how deletionist an editor is based on these summary statistics: there is a big bias depending on how editors tend to find AfDs. Looking over the delete opinions where the outcome was keep, the only ones where I found LuK3's overall

3012:

had cause to disagree with one, to the point that I've deliberately picked his report first out of a backlogged AIV before, just because I know it'll be actionable. Giving him the admin bit would significantly reduce the backlog of these damn correct reports that other admins need to

2787:

He pops in to #wikipedia-en-revdel on freenode all the time with revdel requests. All of them were valid, so he clearly has a clue. Give him the mop so he can stop banging on the door of the janitor's closet to wake us up at 3AM local time to delete BLP violations!

374:

I think I am weakest in the template namespace. I have the utmost respect for editors who work and develop intricate templates for wider community use however I do not picture myself getting involved in template development or maintenance as an administrator. --

2563:

My immediate reaction after taking a look at some of the candidate's work was positive but I decided to wait a while to see if any of our resident detectives could turn up something negative. So far, the answer is no, so I will go with my initial impression.

1314:

I most frequently see LuK3 at IRC asking for revdels, and he seems to have very good judgement for them, and is always very courteous. But I've also seen LuK3 around in an increasing number of areas, and think that they would put the tools to good use!

332:

around when I ran would have probably been beneficial to see where I stood as a nominee. Over the following years of editing, I stepped out of my normal editing routine and explored other areas of the project, including 3PO and more content work. --

1644:– Good content creator that can be trusted with the tools. I usually like to see more experience with featured article writing, but featured lists are good enough. Even as we are here discussing their fate, LuK3 is out there fighting vandalism. --- 487:

What in your view is the role of an Administrator in making Knowledge (XXG) a friendly place for new editors? What specific actions will you take as an Administrator to go over and beyond that to make Knowledge (XXG) welcoming to fresh editors?

1216:– it's a full time job keeping up with LuK3's revdel requests and it's definitely time for us to let him handle them himself. As with the nominators, my interactions with the candidate have always been positive, and I trust his judgement. – 1054:. This candidate has an admirable skillset, and more than enough activity since his return to assuage any concerns I might have. I might bring up his deletionist nature, but if that's the case, I've really reached the bottom of the barrel. 1256:– I'm very pleased to support. LuK3 is one of our most helpful editors in the behind-the-scenes maintenance areas of the project where the admin toolset is most needed, and his content work is quite good as well. Let's give him the mop. 3290:

per the good temperament, clear need for the tools, outstanding work in areas that attract more newbies and non-Wikipedians (e.g. OTRS), and great skill in content creation. Thank you for all your contributions so far as a non-admin! —

1034:

Just to add I also appreciate LuK3 bringing up marginal rev del cases and have every expectation that he'll continue to discuss rather than act on such matters, as you and I both do GeneralNotability, should he get the toolset. Best,

2229:

This user is really good at reverting vandalism and non-constructive edits, as I have seen this user beat me to reverting vandalism and non-constructive edits many times. I think it would be a good idea to make LuK3 an admin.

3271:. To be quite honest, I was hoping for a little more substance in the answer to my question, but after a few days I have not found anything of actual concern, and that nobody else seems to have done so either speaks volumes. 1395:

need for the tools demonstrated, calm and level headed and competent user. fwiw, I took a look at their afd votes and they demonstrate a decent handle on policy etc., though that's obviously not their main 'selling point'.

317:

It's been a while since your first RFA, so I don't think any reasonable person would hold it against you. I'd be interested to hear if (and if so, how) your approach to anything has changed significantly since then.

3924:. The only things that are stopping me from going to the oppose section is that the nominators are editors I hold in very high regard and there are no allegations of misconduct since this candidate's last RfA. 2324:

A solid editor with a long history of positive contributions to the project. I've seen them around and always been impressed by their work and demeanor. No red or yellow flags. I think we have a winner here.

3740: 96:

LuK3’s skills range beyond this one area, however. He has shown himself to be skilled at content creation having worked to help two lists to featured list status and he has a GA which earned him a

629: 303:

per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

296: 267: 414:

for GA, and then handled the review, dealing with all the issues raised, for which you were complimented. Yet you don't list this article as one you helped bring to GA status. Why is that?

1566:- if anyone has shown a need for access to the revdel buttons, it's LuK3. My interactions with him have been unfailingly kind and courteous, and this attitude is reflected in his work at 1121:, I trust the noms, and see nothing to make me believe that LuK3 would abuse the tools if given. Additionally, I've seen them around, and strongly believe that they have great judgement. 259: 3736: 553:

article and notice three solid (though not Speedy) policy based reasons to delete (perhaps unsourced spam copied from a company website, though it could be anything). What do you do?

245:

the administrator side of anti-vandalism work. As a member of the Account Creation team, I also take pride in helping editors create an account so they can contribute constructively.

1498:

other admin-y type stuff and when I could find nothing of any concern, I begged them to run months ago. If I wasn't such a lazy fucker, I would have offer to nominate them, in fact.

3161:

Carelessly and being aware that we are all humans and that super dedication (addiction) to the project burns people out which makes them bad admins, are two very different things.

280:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

3978: 1005:. Per nominators. I think the candidate has the right temperament and attitude, and need to be an administrator, with both content creation and anti-vandal work. 3489: 624:

article back in May. I agreed that there was too many images and should be cut down, given the size of the article. The discussion was reignited last month, see

2063:— an impressive counter vandalism record across AIV, UAA, RPP, balanced with an excellent contribution to article quality. That balance is not an easy find. 889: 3996: 2392:- My only slight concern is the gaps in editing however as noted below we are indeed volunteers, Other than that I see no red flags here, Easy support. – 203:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1528:- no concerns. That first RFA could be a poster child for "broken RFA process"... sorry you had to go through that, Luk, and thanks for standing again. 884: 704: 1074:- in past encounters LuK3 has been willing to discuss his actions & consider alternatives. The sort of consideration it's good to see in an admin. 745: 699: 325: 1942: 2712:

hiatuses is not necessarily a bad thing. Also their last hiatus was September 2019, so they have been consistently editing for more than a year.

3917: 3488:. Appears to be thoughtful and open-minded. Particularly impressed by willingness to change their mind when presented with new evidence as in 610:

What experience have you had in resolving or trying to resolve disputes between editors, either article content disputes or conduct disputes?

1651: 827: 1354:- at this point in my WP experiences, someone who is versed in sniffing out vandals, socks and trolls is much needed. This is a good start. 1423: 2007:. Their answers are good and many people whose opinions I respect are also supporting. They sound like they would do well with the tools. 514: 124:

the skill and judgment to be one of our best. I have every confidence that LuK3 will make a terrific administrator, and I hope you agree.

3764:

Your editing pattern is very inconsistent, and have had big gaps between your editing periods. What if you were to take a hiatus again?

2608: 2096:

Very impressive anti-vandalism work, and good judgement if I may add. This editor clearly has the skills for being an excellent admin.

33: 17: 2139: 3940: 3218: 2659: 775: 732: 254:

For content creation, I'm proud of the television-related articles that I brought to either good or featured status. I helped bring

2270:

Based on my own experience and the testimony of others, I'm confident that he'll make responsible and productive use of the tools.

769: 3051: 2350: 2258: 2161: 1674: 1323: 1176:

Nominators are people I trust and made encouraging nominationation statements. I've otherwise never seen this candidate before. –

879: 575:

keep !votes. I would also hope my argument would persuade others to base their reasoning in policies and guidelines as well. --

167:

for the nomination and co-nomination. I accept the nomination. For disclosure, I have not and will not edit for pay and have one

3535: 1891: 1469: 2449: 1532: 1403: 2891: 1954: 3569: 2051: 1773: 1690: 1632: 1547:

would be used well. I read through the first RfA and agree with Levivich. Clear net positive if we give Luke the tools.

739: 411: 3948: 3874: 2684: 2198: 1879: 1670: 1449: 1242: 1025: 60: 3661: 2806: 1887: 993: 799: 725: 632:. Fortunately, it looked like the editor did get the issue and removed images so no further action was needed. -- 146: 90: 925: 617: 216:

Since most of my Knowledge (XXG) work has been in counter-vandalism, I intend on using the administrator tools at

3465: 2014: 1645: 1485: 820: 3691: 3402: 3106: 2926: 2342:

I researched the candidate some time back and all the concerns then have now been resolved. No further issues.

1419: 915: 2585:. Has demonstrated plenty of clue since the 2012 nomination, clearly can be trusted with the tools. Good luck! 2973:

I'm somewhat concerned about the high volume of delete votes at AfD, but not enough to withdraw my support. ~

2621:– A highly tenured editor with a good head on his shoulders. LuK3 should definitely become an administrator. 3565: 3385: 3351: 3069: 2603: 2280: 2086: 2047: 1834: 1769: 1723: 1686: 1628: 1364: 1299: 1281: 3847: 1109:

One of the most trustable anti-vandals, good at CSD; having some big awarded articles doesn't hurt either.

853: 784: 3944: 3870: 3586: 3581:-- Based on answer to Q8. The correct answer was "count votes". Also acceptable, would have been "skip". 3334: 3123: 2533: 2381: 2135: 1876: 1577: 1238: 1163: 1021: 962: 630:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1046#OWN and IDHT issues on Talk:FOCSA Building

55: 3921: 3811:

And we have a process for that. Come on. Adminship doesn't have a job description or a daily task list.--

2291:

I have consistently seen high quality AIV reports or CSD tagging from the candidate; has my trust. Best,

874: 168: 3928: 3552: 3368: 3277: 3223: 2656: 2330: 2178: 1059: 3977:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

3846:

Carelessly and being aware that we are all humans and that super dedication (addiction) to the project

795: 3008:- I've spotted LuK3's reports at AIV and RFPP many times, and without exaggeration I don't think I've 869: 3725: 3620: 3461: 3047: 2976: 2551: 2514: 2348: 2256: 2236: 2157: 2115: 2008: 1992: 1910: 1858: 1814: 1657: 1481: 1204: 1010: 813: 602: 2746: 2360:, I have seen a couple of judgement slips at RFPP nominations, but certainly on the positive side.-- 572: 97: 3888: 3837: 3802: 3769: 3687: 3397: 3099: 2961: 2918: 2733: 2570: 2365: 1612: 1594: 1553: 1466: 1415: 1040: 948: 625: 105: 3952: 3931: 3892: 3878: 3863: 3841: 3827: 3806: 3792: 3773: 3757: 3729: 3695: 3665: 3642: 3624: 3607: 3590: 3573: 3556: 3539: 3519: 3501: 3480: 3469: 3452: 3438: 3424: 3408: 3389: 3372: 3355: 3338: 3321: 3304: 3282: 3262: 3245: 3228: 3204: 3189: 3172: 3143: 3127: 3113: 3090: 3073: 3056: 3033: 3000: 2984: 2965: 2948: 2931: 2912: 2896: 2869: 2852: 2829: 2812: 2779: 2762: 2737: 2721: 2703: 2691: 2662: 2644: 2627: 2613: 2589: 2577: 2555: 2538: 2518: 2501: 2484: 2475:

Great candidate; I have no concerns regarding his ability to use a few extra buttons cluefully.--

2467: 2453: 2430: 2405: 2384: 2369: 2352: 2334: 2316: 2299: 2283: 2260: 2241: 2221: 2202: 2182: 2165: 2145: 2119: 2102: 2088: 2055: 2046:

giving the tools to do even more of the good work they're already doing. Thanks for volunteering.

2038: 2021: 1999: 1974: 1957: 1933: 1916: 1895: 1882: 1867: 1848:

Supported the candidate's first RfA (which was unnecessarily harsh), and am happy to do so again.

1840: 1819: 1802: 1776: 1760: 1741: 1727: 1710: 1694: 1678: 1661: 1636: 1616: 1598: 1581: 1558: 1538: 1520: 1507: 1489: 1472: 1454: 1427: 1409: 1387: 1367: 1346: 1335: 1326: 1306: 1284: 1265: 1246: 1232: 1208: 1191: 1168: 1146: 1129: 1113: 1101: 1083: 1063: 1044: 1029: 1014: 997: 966: 952: 674: 649: 592: 562: 534: 497: 465: 449: 423: 392: 350: 192: 150: 109: 69: 3851: 3448: 3381: 3347: 3258: 3241: 3185: 3065: 2910: 2750: 2598: 2463: 2443: 2272: 2072: 2034: 1966: 1929: 1829: 1798: 1719: 1535: 1294: 1274: 1142: 899: 558: 504: 461: 419: 848: 3821: 3637: 3583: 3477: 3330: 3168: 3163:- not likely to be any more careless than the admin who stained an otherwise clean block log. 3152: 3119: 2993: 2888: 2865: 2527: 2378: 2312: 2131: 2097: 1950: 1750: 1737: 1572: 1384: 1155: 958: 894: 3064:: per other !votes and comments to this point in time I am supporting with limited scrutiny. 2150:

I've checked a random sample of this candidate's contributions and found nothing of concern.—

1237:

Too bad the RfA didn't run a week earlier, otherwise we could force him to apply for OS too!

329: 262:

to good article and featured list status, respectively. I am also in the process of bringing

217: 3936: 3925: 3753: 3548: 3364: 3317: 3297: 3273: 3213: 2944: 2847: 2825: 2775: 2713: 2653: 2625: 2497: 2423: 2326: 2174: 1094: 1079: 1067:

And yes, after an edit clash I accidentally duplicated Epicgenius' !vote, apologies to both!

1055: 620:. One that specifically stands out in my mind was an issue regarding too many images on the 309: 3329:

great temperament, demonstrable need for the toolset, and outstanding work with new users.

1702:. Good activity, reasonable answers to questions, and nice work on CSD also. Best of luck, 1567: 225: 221: 3913: 3721: 3616: 3497: 3086: 3042: 2673: 2547: 2510: 2343: 2251: 2231: 2194: 2151: 2111: 1985: 1905: 1849: 1808: 1445: 1358: 1316: 1227: 1200: 1154:

I've seen Luk3 at work, no qualms about supporting - thanks for putting yourself forward.

1110: 1006: 263: 172: 3180:. Does excellent work, good demeanor and interactions, trustworthiness well established. 3746:). In both instances his delete argument was made before alternatives were suggested. — 3884: 3833: 3798: 3788: 3778: 3765: 3677: 3657: 3529: 2957: 2800: 2729: 2639: 2586: 2565: 2393: 2361: 2217: 1608: 1590: 1550: 1516: 1503: 1463: 1137:. Today I am honored to give you support. There are no obstacles here, just good work. 1036: 987: 944: 719: 669: 659: 641: 621: 584: 526: 493: 441: 384: 342: 184: 160: 140: 101: 84: 3633:- an impressive record already. I'm sure they would make good use of the admin tools. 1091:

Good mastery of CSD, writer of some large articles, good at Afd. What's not to like.

3990: 3859: 3603: 3510: 3444: 3254: 3237: 3200: 3181: 3156: 2905: 2758: 2459: 2439: 2030: 1925: 1785: 1705: 1529: 1397: 1261: 1183: 1138: 1127: 554: 544: 457: 415: 402: 255: 2246:

On the other hand, admins who focus a lot on vandalism tend to do silly things like

3813: 3634: 3474: 3433: 3164: 2878: 2861: 2308: 2293: 1946: 360: 3747: 3418: 3313: 3292: 3136: 2940: 2838: 2821: 2771: 2700: 2622: 2493: 2415: 1339: 1075: 2526:- I nominated him the first time and felt he was ready then. No worries now. 2029:

per Barkeep49, TonyBallioni, MJL, CaptainEek, Atsme, Wugapodes, and Fastily. —⁠

3493: 3082: 3018: 2476: 2189: 1436: 1355: 1217: 3971:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3598:

Trusted user, clear need for the tools, net positive, no concerns on my end.

3783: 3652: 2789: 2770:: Competent and clearly operates with the project's best interest at heart. 2636: 2212: 2066: 1499: 981: 973: 715: 634: 577: 519: 489: 479: 434: 377: 335: 177: 164: 134: 126: 80: 3797:

Somebody should not have admin tools if they’re not even going to be here.

2413:- Great anti-vandalism work, should do great work with the admin toolbox. 2307:

Essential work and good to have someone so experienced in it as an admin.

2124:

Per Bradv and Oshwah. On my own to-nominate list, so glad to see this! ~

920: 3599: 2877:, often see him active contributing, he would be a great sysop. — Yours, 2635:

I approve of their editing record and trust their judgment and handling.

1257: 1178: 1122: 3098:

Very good prospect, can only be a benefit to UAA, AIV and related areas

2652:

I've seen LuK3's good work and trust that the tools will build upon it.

1589:. Not an idiot. Not too weird. Not a dramamonger. Good admin qualities. 3416:

I support this nomination as per the above comments and my experience.

3155:. Their work over the last 12 months is alone enough to qualify , and 3041:- per nom. Competent editor per Mazca; often seen reverting vandalism. 368:

What area or areas of the English Knowledge (XXG) are you the weakest?

1543:

I've seen their reports at RFPP, and they give me the impression that

3981:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

1924:

per the immortal words of TonyBallioni, "not a jerk, has a clue." --

3741:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Great White of Wildwood NJ

1827:. I have looked at his contributions and it looks like he is ready. 1735:— This project needs more admins + overall they are a net positive. 1607:

Someone must be paying off oppose voters and I could use some cash.

1338:

and our policies and procedures. Happy to finally see him here. :-)

798:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 3673:

Has a clue, knows what he is doing. 14:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

805: 2110:

My interactions with the candidate have been entirely positive.

809: 1669:

Long term user has been around since 2008 ,Clear net positive.

238:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

3883:

I guess you have a point, but I still think my point stands.

3650:

Definitely. Solid participation in several areas. Good luck!

668:

idea to implement tertiary sources for an article in future?

157:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

2247: 1751: 3737:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Damn You Auto Correct

2904:, great work, will certainly be an asset to the project. — 2492:

for meeting my mins and not a single voice in opposition.

1941:

hope this makes up for never getting around to reviewing

571:

guidelines, my argument should carry more weight than the

268:

List of awards and nominations received by Game of Thrones

3735:

participation could be said to count as deletionist were

456:

I agree with you. I like that you have that perspective.

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

260:

List of awards and nominations received by Emilia Clarke

210:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

53:

Final (142/0/3); ended 14:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

3744: 3443:

I imagine adminship to be very useful to the candidate

3312:

no reason to think this user would abuse the tools. --

763: 757: 751: 3460:- No reason not to support, and reasons to support. 2248:

block experienced content creators for mild outbursts

3781:, what if? We're humans with lives. And volunteers. 1462:No issues and a strong contributor. Best of luck. 908: 862: 841: 628:. I bought up the user conduct issue to AN/I, see 328:run as nervous and hesitant. In hindsight, having 3490:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/CrowdStrike 295:You may ask optional questions below. There is a 3832:But it should not just be given out carelessly. 616:I have provided multiple third opinions over at 3916:, I am rather disappointed by the candidate's 1768:. Anyone Barkeep49 nominates has my support. ♠ 1435:per nominators, bradv and GeneralNotability. 821: 8: 3848:burns people out which makes them bad admins 828: 814: 806: 3922:low non-automated mainspace participation 2250:, so maybe not the best argument to use. 1982:. Excellent work in counter-vandalism. — 1334:- Is definitely versed and familiar with 782:Edit summary usage for LuK3 can be found 3432:: Net asset, (probably) won't screw up. 794:Please keep discussion constructive and 3720:not sure this candidate would do both. 3212:and all the best with the admin tools. 2837:, I expect good things with the tools. 697: 266:to FAC. In addition, I helped promote 3160: 1292:will be a net-positive to the project. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 3941:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 3159:makes a pertinent observation with: 2992:- more admins is always a good thing. 7: 3850:, are two very different things. -- 1376: 3236:a big net positive to the project. 696: 626:Talk:FOCSA Building#Too many images 24: 3997:Successful requests for adminship 2796: 2546:Can be trusted with the tools. -- 2699:for the counter vandalism work. 1377: 3953:14:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 3932:23:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 3893:13:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3879:23:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 3864:22:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 3842:21:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 3828:22:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 3807:13:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 3793:13:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 3774:13:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 3758:08:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 3743:(when the article looked like 3730:20:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 3696:14:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3686:- Trusted and well qualified. 3666:13:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3643:10:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3625:09:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3608:08:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3591:07:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3574:06:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3557:05:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 3540:19:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 3520:18:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 3502:13:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 3481:02:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 3470:23:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3453:18:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3439:14:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3425:14:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3409:07:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3390:06:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3380:, seems to be a net positive. 3373:01:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3356:00:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 3339:21:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3322:20:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3305:20:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3283:20:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3263:19:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3246:13:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3229:09:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3205:07:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3190:05:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3173:02:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3144:02:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 3128:23:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3114:22:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3091:21:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3074:21:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3057:20:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3034:19:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 3001:19:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2985:18:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2966:17:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2949:14:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2932:11:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2913:11:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2897:09:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2870:05:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2853:04:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2830:02:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2820:Competent and trusted user. ‐‐ 2813:00:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 2780:23:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2763:22:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2745:Per IRC mentioned by noms and 2738:20:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2722:19:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2704:19:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2692:17:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2663:16:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2645:14:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2628:11:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2614:11:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2590:08:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2578:05:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2556:03:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2539:01:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2519:01:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2502:00:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 2485:23:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2468:20:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2454:20:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2431:20:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2406:19:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2385:19:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2370:19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2353:18:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2335:18:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2317:18:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2300:17:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2284:15:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2261:18:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2242:14:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2222:13:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2203:12:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2183:12:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2166:11:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2146:10:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2120:10:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2103:09:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2089:08:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2056:06:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2039:04:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2022:04:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2000:03:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1975:03:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1958:03:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1934:02:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1917:02:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1896:02:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1883:02:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1868:01:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1841:01:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1820:00:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1803:00:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1777:00:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1761:00:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1742:00:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1728:00:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 1711:23:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1695:23:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1679:23:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1662:22:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1637:22:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1617:23:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 1599:21:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1582:21:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1559:21:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1539:20:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1521:20:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1508:20:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1490:20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1473:20:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1455:19:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1428:19:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1410:19:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1388:18:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1368:18:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1347:18:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1327:17:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1307:17:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1285:17:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1266:17:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1247:17:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1233:16:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1209:16:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1192:16:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1169:16:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1147:16:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1130:16:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1114:15:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1102:15:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1084:15:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1064:15:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1045:15:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1030:15:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1015:15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 998:15:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 967:15:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 953:15:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 675:06:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 650:21:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 593:13:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 563:07:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 535:16:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 498:16:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 466:13:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 450:10:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 424:09:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 393:18:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 351:17:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 193:21:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 151:20:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 110:19:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 70:14:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 3363:. Fully qualified candidate. 705:Requests for adminship/LuK3 2 618:Knowledge (XXG):Third opinion 169:legitimate alternate account 3346:I support this nomination. 2597:Does not seem problematic. 1515:per all the above. - Dank ( 1480:Oh my goodness absolutely! 700:Requests for adminship/LuK3 199:Questions for the candidate 4013: 2071:I wish you all the best, — 1199:level headed, has a clue. 601:Additional questions from 171:for security reasons, see 1273:good candidate overall. — 658:Additional question from 543:Additional question from 478:Additional question from 401:Additional question from 359:Additional question from 308:Additional question from 3974:Please do not modify it. 957:Not a jerk, has a clue. 3910:Neutral, leaning oppose 515:requests for undeletion 412:Yankees–Red Sox rivalry 38:Please do not modify it 2012:(formerly Tokyogirl79) 1671:Pharaoh of the Wizards 1903:for a job well done! 1888:ProcrastinatingReader 324:I would characterize 34:request for adminship 2458:Trusted, competent. 2438:likely net positive 1965:happy to support. -- 943:As nominator. Best, 921:Global contributions 1945:last February :) – 1375:- It's No Big Deal 875:Non-automated edits 695:RfAs for this user: 3918:delete-bias at AfD 3566:Crystallizedcarbon 3118:Support per noms. 2048:Indignant Flamingo 1875:No reason not to. 1687:Clone commando sev 1629:Paradise Chronicle 854:Edit summary usage 802:before commenting. 39: 3945:GeneralNotability 3871:GeneralNotability 3862: 3825: 3756: 3676: 3055: 2930: 2761: 2690: 2642: 2164: 2144: 2013: 1997: 1877:ThePlatypusofDoom 1408: 1361: 1302: 1239:GeneralNotability 1068: 1022:GeneralNotability 980: 971:As co-nominator. 934: 933: 800:his contributions 508: 133: 37: 4004: 3976: 3961:General comments 3858: 3856: 3819: 3752: 3674: 3640: 3517: 3436: 3423: 3421: 3406: 3400: 3300: 3281: 3226: 3221: 3216: 3198:do; happy days, 3141: 3111: 3104: 3045: 3031: 2998: 2979: 2928: 2925: 2923: 2908: 2885: 2845: 2809: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2757: 2755: 2687: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2640: 2575: 2573:Let's discuss it 2482: 2428: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2403: 2398: 2296: 2282: 2278: 2239: 2234: 2173:No objections. - 2156: 2128: 2127: 2085: 2070: 2018: 2011: 1995: 1991: 1988: 1972: 1969: 1913: 1908: 1863: 1854: 1837: 1832: 1817: 1811: 1793: 1791: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1654: 1648: 1575: 1557: 1546: 1441: 1400: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1359: 1343: 1321: 1305: 1300: 1297: 1278: 1230: 1225: 1190: 1181: 1161: 1158: 1125: 1099: 1097: 1066: 978: 870:Articles created 830: 823: 816: 807: 787: 779: 738: 713:Links for LuK3: 646: 645: 639: 638: 589: 588: 582: 581: 531: 530: 524: 523: 502: 446: 445: 439: 438: 389: 388: 382: 381: 347: 346: 340: 339: 304: 189: 188: 182: 181: 131: 67: 63: 58: 4012: 4011: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3979:this nomination 3972: 3963: 3914:User:Lightburst 3852: 3749:Charles Stewart 3713: 3704: 3638: 3538: 3516: 3511: 3462:Robert McClenon 3434: 3419: 3417: 3403: 3398: 3298: 3272: 3224: 3219: 3214: 3165:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3137: 3135:. No concerns. 3107: 3100: 3019: 2994: 2977: 2927: 2919: 2906: 2894: 2879: 2839: 2807: 2801: 2791: 2751: 2685: 2677: 2674: 2641:◊distænt write◊ 2571: 2509:– No concerns. 2477: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2414: 2399: 2394: 2377:- no concerns. 2294: 2276: 2271: 2237: 2232: 2125: 2083: 2064: 2016: 2009:ReaderofthePack 1993: 1986: 1970: 1967: 1911: 1906: 1861: 1852: 1835: 1830: 1815: 1809: 1789: 1788: 1755: 1752: 1684:big fat support 1658:Coffeeandcrumbs 1652: 1646: 1627:solid answer #3 1571: 1548: 1544: 1482:RickinBaltimore 1453: 1437: 1406: 1378: 1363: 1341: 1317: 1296:« Gonzo fan2007 1295: 1293: 1276: 1228: 1218: 1179: 1177: 1166: 1159: 1156: 1123: 1095: 1093: 940: 935: 930: 904: 858: 837: 836:RfA/RfB toolbox 834: 783: 731: 714: 710: 693: 643: 642: 636: 635: 603:Robert McClenon 586: 585: 579: 578: 528: 527: 521: 520: 443: 442: 436: 435: 386: 385: 379: 378: 344: 343: 337: 336: 294: 264:Game of Thrones 201: 186: 185: 179: 178: 173:User:Luke (alt) 159:Thank you both 117: 78: 65: 61: 56: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4010: 4008: 4000: 3999: 3989: 3988: 3984: 3983: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3866: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3712: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3703: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3688:TheGeneralUser 3681: 3668: 3645: 3628: 3610: 3593: 3576: 3559: 3542: 3534: 3527:- definitely. 3522: 3512: 3504: 3483: 3472: 3455: 3441: 3427: 3411: 3392: 3375: 3358: 3341: 3324: 3307: 3288:Strong support 3285: 3265: 3248: 3231: 3207: 3192: 3175: 3146: 3130: 3116: 3093: 3076: 3059: 3036: 3003: 2987: 2968: 2951: 2934: 2921:CAPTAIN MEDUSA 2915: 2899: 2892: 2872: 2860:. Great user. 2855: 2832: 2815: 2782: 2765: 2740: 2724: 2706: 2694: 2665: 2647: 2630: 2616: 2592: 2580: 2558: 2541: 2521: 2504: 2487: 2470: 2456: 2433: 2408: 2387: 2372: 2355: 2337: 2319: 2302: 2286: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2224: 2205: 2185: 2168: 2148: 2122: 2105: 2091: 2058: 2041: 2024: 2002: 1977: 1960: 1936: 1919: 1898: 1885: 1870: 1843: 1822: 1805: 1779: 1763: 1744: 1730: 1713: 1697: 1681: 1664: 1639: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1584: 1561: 1541: 1523: 1510: 1492: 1475: 1457: 1443: 1430: 1416:John M Wolfson 1412: 1402: 1390: 1370: 1357: 1349: 1329: 1309: 1287: 1268: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1211: 1197:Strong support 1194: 1171: 1164: 1149: 1132: 1116: 1104: 1086: 1069: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1017: 1000: 969: 955: 939: 936: 932: 931: 929: 928: 923: 918: 912: 910: 906: 905: 903: 902: 897: 892: 887: 882: 877: 872: 866: 864: 860: 859: 857: 856: 851: 845: 843: 839: 838: 835: 833: 832: 825: 818: 810: 791: 790: 789: 780: 709: 708: 707: 702: 694: 692: 689: 687: 685: 684: 683: 682: 662: 655: 654: 653: 652: 622:FOCSA Building 605: 598: 597: 596: 595: 547: 540: 539: 538: 537: 482: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 410:You nominated 405: 398: 397: 396: 395: 363: 356: 355: 354: 353: 312: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 274: 273: 272: 271: 249: 248: 247: 246: 232: 231: 230: 229: 200: 197: 196: 195: 116: 113: 77: 74: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4009: 3998: 3995: 3994: 3992: 3982: 3980: 3975: 3969: 3968: 3965: 3964: 3960: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3930: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3908: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3867: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3855: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3826: 3823: 3816: 3815: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3785: 3780: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3750: 3745: 3742: 3738: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3682: 3679: 3672: 3669: 3667: 3663: 3662:contributions 3659: 3655: 3654: 3649: 3646: 3644: 3641: 3636: 3632: 3629: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3594: 3592: 3589: 3588: 3585: 3580: 3577: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3560: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3543: 3541: 3537: 3532: 3531: 3526: 3523: 3521: 3518: 3515: 3508: 3505: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3484: 3482: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3440: 3437: 3431: 3428: 3426: 3422: 3415: 3412: 3410: 3407: 3405: 3401: 3396: 3393: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3382:Airbornemihir 3379: 3376: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3359: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3348:R. J. Dockery 3345: 3342: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3325: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3308: 3306: 3302: 3301: 3294: 3289: 3286: 3284: 3279: 3275: 3270: 3266: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3249: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3232: 3230: 3227: 3222: 3217: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3196: 3193: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3176: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3142: 3140: 3134: 3131: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3115: 3112: 3110: 3105: 3103: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3077: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3066:Djm-leighpark 3063: 3060: 3058: 3053: 3049: 3044: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3032: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3016: 3011: 3007: 3004: 3002: 2999: 2997: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2952: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2935: 2933: 2929: 2924: 2922: 2916: 2914: 2911: 2909: 2903: 2900: 2898: 2895: 2889: 2886: 2884: 2883: 2876: 2873: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2846: 2844: 2843: 2836: 2833: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2816: 2814: 2810: 2808:Contributions 2804: 2795: 2794: 2786: 2783: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2754: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2710: 2707: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2695: 2693: 2688: 2681: 2680: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2651: 2648: 2646: 2643: 2638: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2617: 2615: 2612: 2611: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2601: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2569: 2568: 2562: 2559: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2542: 2540: 2537: 2536: 2531: 2530: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2505: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2455: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2434: 2432: 2427: 2419: 2412: 2409: 2407: 2404: 2402: 2397: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2356: 2354: 2351: 2349: 2347: 2346: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2323: 2320: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2257: 2255: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2235: 2228: 2225: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2186: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2149: 2147: 2143: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2123: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2095: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2082: 2081: 2078: 2075: 2068: 2062: 2059: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1990: 1989: 1981: 1978: 1976: 1973: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1920: 1918: 1915: 1914: 1909: 1902: 1899: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1847: 1844: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1833: 1831:NASCARfan0548 1826: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1812: 1806: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1783: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1759: 1748: 1745: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1718:No concerns. 1717: 1714: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1659: 1656: 1649: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1585: 1583: 1579: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1555: 1552: 1542: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1456: 1451: 1447: 1442: 1440: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1411: 1407: 1405: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1277:Nnadigoodluck 1272: 1269: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1226: 1224: 1223: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1187: 1182: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1162: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1111:Moneytrees🏝️ 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1018: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1001: 999: 995: 992: 989: 986: 983: 976: 975: 970: 968: 964: 960: 956: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 937: 927: 924: 922: 919: 917: 914: 913: 911: 907: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 867: 865: 861: 855: 852: 850: 847: 846: 844: 840: 831: 826: 824: 819: 817: 812: 811: 808: 804: 803: 801: 797: 786: 781: 777: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 737: 734: 730: 727: 724: 721: 717: 712: 711: 706: 703: 701: 698: 690: 688: 681: 678: 677: 676: 673: 672: 666: 663: 661: 657: 656: 651: 648: 647: 640: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 612: 611: 609: 606: 604: 600: 599: 594: 591: 590: 583: 574: 569: 566: 565: 564: 560: 556: 551: 548: 546: 542: 541: 536: 533: 532: 525: 516: 511: 506: 505:edit conflict 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 486: 483: 481: 477: 476: 467: 463: 459: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 448: 447: 440: 430: 427: 426: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 406: 404: 400: 399: 394: 391: 390: 383: 373: 370: 369: 367: 364: 362: 358: 357: 352: 349: 348: 341: 331: 327: 323: 320: 319: 316: 313: 311: 307: 306: 305: 302: 301:two questions 298: 285: 282: 281: 279: 276: 275: 269: 265: 261: 257: 256:Emilia Clarke 253: 252: 251: 250: 243: 240: 239: 237: 234: 233: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 211: 209: 206: 205: 204: 198: 194: 191: 190: 183: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 154: 153: 152: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 129: 128: 121: 115:Co-nomination 114: 112: 111: 107: 103: 99: 98:million award 94: 92: 89: 86: 82: 75: 73: 72: 71: 68: 64: 59: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3973: 3970: 3909: 3853: 3818: 3812: 3782: 3748: 3716: 3683: 3670: 3651: 3647: 3630: 3612: 3595: 3584:Usedtobecool 3582: 3578: 3561: 3544: 3528: 3524: 3513: 3506: 3485: 3457: 3429: 3413: 3404: 3394: 3377: 3360: 3343: 3331:OhKayeSierra 3326: 3309: 3296: 3287: 3268: 3253:. Looks OK. 3250: 3233: 3209: 3199: 3194: 3177: 3148: 3138: 3132: 3120:Gog the Mild 3108: 3101: 3095: 3078: 3061: 3038: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3014: 3009: 3005: 2996:CAPTAIN RAJU 2995: 2989: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2953: 2936: 2920: 2901: 2881: 2880: 2874: 2857: 2848: 2841: 2840: 2834: 2817: 2790: 2784: 2767: 2752: 2742: 2726: 2716: 2715: 2708: 2696: 2672: 2667: 2649: 2632: 2618: 2609: 2604: 2599: 2594: 2582: 2572: 2566: 2560: 2543: 2534: 2529:Dennis Brown 2528: 2523: 2506: 2489: 2479: 2472: 2446: 2435: 2410: 2400: 2395: 2389: 2374: 2357: 2344: 2339: 2321: 2304: 2292: 2288: 2273: 2267: 2252: 2226: 2211: 2207: 2188: 2170: 2152: 2129: 2107: 2099:CycloneYoris 2098: 2093: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2060: 2043: 2026: 2015: 2004: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1962: 1949: 1938: 1921: 1904: 1900: 1872: 1860: 1859: 1851: 1850: 1845: 1828: 1824: 1787: 1786: 1781: 1765: 1746: 1738:Celestina007 1736: 1732: 1715: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1683: 1666: 1641: 1624: 1604: 1603: 1586: 1573:stwalkerster 1563: 1525: 1517:push to talk 1512: 1494: 1477: 1459: 1438: 1432: 1401: 1392: 1372: 1351: 1340: 1331: 1318: 1311: 1289: 1275: 1270: 1253: 1221: 1219: 1213: 1196: 1185: 1173: 1151: 1134: 1118: 1106: 1092: 1088: 1071: 1051: 1002: 990: 984: 972: 959:TonyBallioni 793: 792: 772: 766: 760: 754: 748: 742: 735: 728: 722: 686: 679: 670: 664: 633: 613: 607: 576: 567: 549: 518: 509: 484: 433: 428: 407: 376: 371: 365: 334: 326:my first RFA 321: 314: 300: 293: 283: 277: 241: 235: 213: 207: 202: 176: 156: 143: 137: 125: 122: 118: 95: 87: 79: 54: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3937:Deryck Chan 3549:Gleeanon409 3365:Newyorkbrad 2654:Airplaneman 2587:— sparklism 2327:Ad Orientem 2175:Kj cheetham 1807:Why not? -- 1450:revolutions 1096:scope_creep 1056:Nosebagbear 926:User rights 916:CentralAuth 310:Vanamonde93 3912:. Same as 3722:Lightburst 3617:Cavalryman 3564:Gladly. -- 3081:No doubt! 3043:P,TO 19104 2939:. Cheers! 2747:WP:SOFIXIT 2619:Absolutely 2548:Malcolmxl5 2511:EdJohnston 2478:Jezebel's 2460:~ ToBeFree 2345:Ritchie333 2253:Ritchie333 2233:Wikiffeine 2153:S Marshall 2112:Cwmhiraeth 1987:Newslinger 1971:SandDoctor 1816:Parlez Moi 1810:Guerillero 1749:Why not? - 1319:CaptainEek 1201:Praxidicae 1007:epicgenius 909:Cross-wiki 890:AfD closes 691:Discussion 573:WP:ILIKEIT 76:Nomination 31:successful 3885:Foxnpichu 3834:Foxnpichu 3799:Foxnpichu 3779:Foxnpichu 3766:Foxnpichu 3678:The4lines 3530:Jauerback 3274:Vanamonde 3017:about. ~ 2958:DannyS712 2730:Vexations 2440:Cas Liber 2362:Ymblanter 2274:Goodnight 1784:per PMC. 1609:Natureium 1591:Natureium 1570:as well. 1470:(contrib) 1464:Eggishorn 1165:(blether) 1037:Barkeep49 945:Barkeep49 885:AfD votes 880:BLP edits 758:block log 671:Nalbarian 660:Nalbarian 161:Barkeep49 102:Barkeep49 3991:Category 3860:(aka DQ) 3671:Support' 3600:Aoi (青い) 3514:FitIndia 3445:Naleksuh 3420:~ BOD ~ 3267:Belated 3255:SilkTork 3238:Roller26 3182:Donner60 3052:contribs 3015:do stuff 2907:kashmīrī 2893:Contribs 2759:(aka DQ) 2450:contribs 2031:andrybak 1943:that FLC 1926:Euryalus 1706:Walwal20 1554:a·po·des 1424:contribs 1398:Eddie891 1342:~Oshwah~ 1174:Support. 1139:Mikola22 900:PROD log 863:Analysis 842:Counters 726:contribs 555:SilkTork 545:SilkTork 458:SilkTork 416:SilkTork 403:SilkTork 91:contribs 66:Chequers 3814:WaltCip 3717:Neutral 3711:Neutral 3684:Support 3675:Signed, 3648:Support 3635:the wub 3631:Support 3613:Support 3596:Support 3562:Support 3545:Support 3525:Support 3507:Support 3486:Support 3458:Support 3435:Harrias 3430:Support 3414:Support 3399:Megan☺️ 3395:Support 3378:Support 3361:Support 3344:Support 3327:Support 3310:Support 3269:support 3234:Support 3210:Support 3201:Lindsay 3195:Support 3178:Support 3149:Support 3133:Support 3102:JW 1961 3096:Support 3079:Support 3062:Support 3039:Support 3006:Support 2990:Support 2971:Support 2956:LGTM -- 2954:Support 2937:Support 2902:Support 2882:Berrely 2875:Support 2862:Pamzeis 2858:Support 2835:Support 2818:Support 2785:Support 2768:Support 2743:Support 2727:Support 2714:Dreamy 2709:Support 2697:Support 2668:Support 2650:Support 2633:Support 2595:Support 2583:Support 2561:Support 2544:Support 2524:Support 2507:Support 2490:Support 2473:Support 2436:Support 2429:20:25, 2411:Support 2390:Support 2382:Snowman 2375:Support 2358:Support 2340:Support 2322:Support 2309:Mccapra 2305:Support 2295:Spencer 2289:Support 2268:Support 2227:Support 2208:Support 2171:Support 2108:Support 2094:Support 2061:Support 2044:Support 2027:Support 2017:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2005:Support 1980:Support 1963:Support 1939:Support 1922:Support 1901:Support 1873:Support 1846:Support 1825:Support 1782:Support 1766:Support 1747:Support 1733:Support 1716:Support 1700:Support 1667:Support 1642:Support 1625:Support 1587:Support 1564:Support 1545:protect 1526:Support 1513:Support 1495:Support 1478:Support 1460:Support 1446:spin me 1433:Support 1393:Support 1373:Support 1352:Support 1336:rev del 1332:Support 1312:Support 1290:Support 1271:Support 1254:Support 1214:Support 1152:Support 1135:Support 1119:Support 1107:Support 1089:Support 1072:Support 1052:Support 1003:Support 938:Support 895:CSD log 733:deleted 361:Dolotta 330:WP:ORCP 218:WP:RFPP 3926:Deryck 3854:Amanda 3754:(talk) 3702:Oppose 3579:Oppose 3314:rogerd 3293:Bilorv 3157:Amanda 3153:Dennis 3151:. per 3139:Nihlus 2941:Nadzik 2842:BD2412 2822:1997kB 2772:Waggie 2753:Amanda 2701:Eatcha 2657:(talk) 2623:Kurtis 2567:Cullen 2494:Ifnord 2417:ɴᴋᴏɴ21 2077:bourne 1880:(talk) 1862:apolis 1792:Thomas 1774:(talk) 1756:ASTILY 1605:Oppose 1568:WP:ACC 1467:(talk) 1301:(talk) 1160:Summit 1076:Cabayi 849:XTools 644:(Talk) 587:(Talk) 529:(Talk) 444:(Talk) 387:(Talk) 345:(Talk) 270:to FL. 226:WP:UAA 224:, and 222:WP:AIV 187:(Talk) 175:. -- 3680:|||| 3536:dude. 3494:Cbl62 3225:bolly 3215:Tolly 3083:S0091 2917:+ ~~ 2749:. -- 2686:Meep? 2605:Hyper 2480:Ponyo 2396:Davey 2379:Giant 2210:100% 2190:Kusma 2126:Amory 1912:broil 1907:Royal 1650:& 1439:78.26 1157:Girth 974:Kevin 796:civil 740:count 297:limit 127:Kevin 62:Spiel 16:< 3949:talk 3920:and 3889:talk 3875:talk 3838:talk 3822:talk 3803:talk 3789:talk 3784:Glen 3770:talk 3739:and 3726:talk 3692:talk 3658:talk 3653:LSGH 3639:"?!" 3621:talk 3604:talk 3570:talk 3553:talk 3498:talk 3475:Step 3466:talk 3449:talk 3386:talk 3369:talk 3352:talk 3335:talk 3318:talk 3299:talk 3278:Talk 3259:talk 3242:talk 3186:talk 3169:talk 3124:talk 3109:Talk 3087:talk 3070:talk 3048:talk 3010:ever 2978:EDDY 2962:talk 2945:talk 2866:talk 2826:talk 2802:Talk 2792:k6ka 2776:talk 2734:talk 2717:Jazz 2637:L3X1 2610:cube 2600:Semi 2552:talk 2515:talk 2498:talk 2464:talk 2444:talk 2425:talk 2401:2010 2366:talk 2331:talk 2313:talk 2277:mush 2218:talk 2213:Glen 2179:talk 2116:talk 2080:Star 2067:LuK3 2052:talk 2035:talk 1994:talk 1947:Tera 1930:talk 1892:talk 1853:Mini 1799:talk 1724:talk 1720:P-K3 1691:talk 1675:talk 1633:talk 1613:talk 1595:talk 1578:talk 1551:Wug· 1504:talk 1500:Nick 1486:talk 1420:talk 1404:Work 1360:Talk 1282:🇳🇬 1262:talk 1243:talk 1220:brad 1205:talk 1186:Talk 1143:talk 1080:talk 1060:talk 1041:talk 1026:talk 1011:talk 982:L235 963:talk 949:talk 785:here 770:rfar 752:logs 720:talk 716:LuK3 637:LuK3 580:LuK3 559:talk 522:LuK3 494:talk 490:Ktin 480:Ktin 462:talk 437:LuK3 420:talk 380:LuK3 338:LuK3 258:and 180:LuK3 165:L235 163:and 135:L235 106:talk 85:talk 81:LuK3 57:Ϣere 47:LuK3 3943:). 3660:) ( 3478:hen 3251:Yes 3050:) ( 2678:Hef 2421:❯❯❯ 2238:•‿• 2074:Mel 1968:The 1951:tix 1770:PMC 1536:ich 1533:v!v 1385:TNT 1258:Mz7 1180:MJL 1124:SQL 979:aka 776:spi 746:AfD 665:10. 513:is 299:of 132:aka 3993:: 3951:) 3929:C. 3891:) 3877:) 3840:) 3805:) 3791:) 3772:) 3728:) 3694:) 3664:) 3623:) 3615:– 3606:) 3587:☎️ 3572:) 3555:) 3547:. 3509:- 3500:) 3492:. 3468:) 3451:) 3388:) 3371:) 3354:) 3337:) 3320:) 3303:) 3261:) 3244:) 3188:) 3171:) 3126:) 3089:) 3072:) 3054:) 2983:~ 2964:) 2947:) 2887:• 2868:) 2828:) 2811:) 2805:· 2797:🍁 2778:) 2736:) 2675:El 2671:‑‑ 2554:) 2535:2¢ 2532:- 2517:) 2500:) 2466:) 2452:) 2368:) 2333:) 2315:) 2220:) 2201:) 2181:) 2138:• 2134:• 2118:) 2054:) 2037:) 1932:) 1894:) 1813:| 1801:) 1772:♠ 1726:) 1693:) 1677:) 1660:) 1635:) 1615:) 1597:) 1580:) 1549:— 1530:Le 1519:) 1506:) 1488:) 1448:/ 1426:) 1422:• 1414:– 1383:- 1365:📧 1304:@ 1264:) 1245:) 1229:🍁 1207:) 1145:) 1082:) 1062:) 1043:) 1028:) 1013:) 996:) 965:) 951:) 764:lu 680:A: 614:A: 608:9. 568:A: 561:) 550:8. 510:A: 496:) 485:7. 464:) 429:A: 422:) 408:6. 372:A: 366:5. 322:A: 315:4. 284:A: 278:3. 242:A: 236:2. 220:, 214:A: 208:1. 149:) 108:) 36:. 3947:( 3887:( 3873:( 3836:( 3824:) 3820:( 3817:- 3801:( 3787:( 3768:( 3724:( 3690:( 3656:( 3627:. 3619:( 3602:( 3568:( 3551:( 3533:/ 3496:( 3464:( 3447:( 3384:( 3367:( 3350:( 3333:( 3316:( 3295:( 3280:) 3276:( 3257:( 3240:( 3220:4 3184:( 3167:( 3122:( 3085:( 3068:( 3046:( 3029:a 3027:c 3025:z 3023:a 3021:m 2960:( 2943:( 2890:∕ 2864:( 2849:T 2824:( 2799:( 2788:— 2774:( 2732:( 2689:) 2683:( 2660:✈ 2550:( 2513:( 2496:( 2462:( 2447:· 2442:( 2364:( 2329:( 2325:- 2311:( 2216:( 2199:c 2197:· 2195:t 2193:( 2187:— 2177:( 2162:C 2160:/ 2158:T 2142:) 2140:c 2136:t 2132:u 2130:( 2114:( 2084:☆ 2069:: 2065:@ 2050:( 2033:( 1955:₵ 1928:( 1890:( 1836:↗ 1797:( 1790:C 1753:F 1722:( 1689:( 1673:( 1655:( 1653:C 1647:C 1631:( 1611:( 1593:( 1576:( 1556: 1502:( 1484:( 1452:) 1444:( 1418:( 1324:⚓ 1260:( 1241:( 1222:v 1203:( 1188:‐ 1184:‐ 1141:( 1078:( 1058:( 1039:( 1024:( 1009:( 994:c 991:· 988:t 985:· 977:( 961:( 947:( 829:e 822:t 815:v 788:. 778:) 773:· 767:· 761:· 755:· 749:· 743:· 736:· 729:· 723:· 718:( 557:( 507:) 503:( 492:( 460:( 418:( 147:c 144:· 141:t 138:· 130:( 104:( 88:· 83:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/LuK3 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index