Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Tanner-Christopher 2

620:

based upon one of my earlier statements in Q6. "anonymity has given some people the feeling that they can be rude to people as they will never meet people." I have encountered a decent amount of incivility myself which kept me from editing articles early in my editing fun here on Knowledge as I didn't want the stress, but in time dealt with the issues in my own way, sometimes with the aid of an admin. and other times on my own utilizing tools like Request for Comment and Request for Page Protection to keep edit warring from continuing on articles in which I desired to improve. I believe there are multiple tools at our disposal which we can use to fight incivility, not only blocking or banning of users. I find all violations of Knowledge policies to be degradations to the project, incivility has levels of severity however, so to say that it is the worst of all of all offenses can be a bit of an overstatement in certain cases.

3186:

wings and spend at least 20% of your time and, at least initially, over 50% of your administrative time on topics unrelated to your personal interests. Also: You wrote "... if I was given the abilities of an administrator on Knowledge, I would be able to better serve the members of Knowledge by being a definitive person that they can goto for assistantship with their personal work here." You do not need administrative tools to become a leader in the editorial realm. Your work so far with the newsletter and elsewhere has already established you as a leader among editors. Being an administrator is more like being a janitor than being a team captain. They require different skills. Are you really sure you want to be a janitor?

563:. I would also take into consideration that the blocking admin. accidentally tagged the block which I have seen in the past and if there was obvious evidence of edit warring I would leave the block in tact believing that the admin. made a simple human error and comment on the user's request to be un-blocked my reasoning and wait for the admin. to return. If it is an extended block and the admin. is away for an indefinite time I would probably have to analyze whether the block is too excessive for edit warring and take action accordingly, meaning limiting the block to a shorter period rather than a potentially lengthier block.-- 737:. However, grossly egregious statements should be dealt with more expeditiously, I would suggest contacting the editor who made the statement and ask that they source their statement, and if they are unable to do so the statement should be removed. i will add that I am greatly in favor of promoting sound academic texts whenever possible over the use of websites, especially personal websites, and blogs which are often written with a POV by people who may or may not have a bias. Nothing beats the quality of a using a well-written, well sourced academic text which I always lean upon when possible as evidenced in 122:(An article I created and brought to GA) amongst many others. I try to be diligent in reverting edits identified as vandalism and I attempt to warn and submit vandals when deemed necessary. I am a strong supporter of Knowledge and feel that if I was given the abilities of an administrator on Knowledge, I would be able to better serve the members of Knowledge by being a definitive person that they can goto for assistantship with their personal work here. I thank you for your consideration and look forward to answering your questions. 835:

simple database that will go into some pulp-culture television show 20 years from now, as such we all need to work together in a non-combative way, however, some just find it necessary to be combative for the sake of being combative and that is why there is a blocking and banning process which is the final solution to your question, which when happens is regrettable but sometimes necessary. I apologize for diverging there for a bit in spots, but I felt there were some important comments to add.

231:

themselves out due to the fact that I believe I understand Knowledge and its desire to have well documented sources from secondary resources without using a personal POV or controversial edits for the sake of creating controversy. Sometimes I just step away from the computer and do something else so that I don't get too stressed out, while other times require more drastic measures when edit warring occurs a third party needs to be brought in through

667:

a consensus by all administrators so that everyone knows that they aren't vandalizing and everyone would be on the same page. However, I still find it somewhat problematic, I find putting up FA of the different George Washington instead of the American president and perhaps some slightly misleading DYK facts would be more inline with what a public encyclopedia would do as this is still (hopefully) a learning place for most who visit the site.--

1172:), and please remember to include full rationales for future fair-use image uploads, but this error is not enough to make me oppose since it is at least tagged as a copyrighted image. Please remain cautious. Please use the tools sparingly. I don't want thank-you-spam though. Mahalo. Oh, a side note, in case you care... it is my opinion that you look much nicer with the shaved head. ;-) Mahalo. -- 2616:(you missed it to say unlike the other cases) and many people expressed concerns about his behaviors at RFA. Thus, you should clarify "the community" as "some of people" in the community "at that time". No matter how time past, the fact does not change; "Kurt Weber self-nominated for his RFA and board election.", which cases are all contraction to his opposing comments to any RFA.-- 2398:

as a chef instructor, published author, culinary judge, as a small business owner, and I'm about to finish my masters degree. I don't really need to seek "power" here on Knowledge to supplement my life. Knowledge is here to help others learn about subjects in an easy to access format and having administrator tools will help this content stay consistently accurate.

70:) - Hello, this is my second time applying for an Administrator position as my first failed due to "no clear consensus" last year. As I extensively edit in my expertise (Food and Culture) on Knowledge, I still feel that the Admin. tools would be an asset for me to continue improving Knowledge. Some of this information will be a repeat fom my prior self-nom. 2656:

unlike your thinking. He is allowed to accuse (speak) self-nominators of power hunger, so I have a right to speak "the truth" regarding his self-nomination. As for 2008 board of election, I see it is a clear case of contradiction. So stop making yourself ridiculous for now. You're attacking me that is also an irony to your saying.--

82:

worked with the project's upkeep. I have assessed and tagged many of the articles for the project and when I found I was overworked by doing that and working on articles and other items for the project I sought out new members to assist me in the task of tagging and the projects members keep growing. I also created the

3063:- his explanation should be enough to say why his return only lasted one month of general activity. Knowledge participation is dictated by real-life events you know, and sometimes they restrict our access on Knowledge. There is no rule that admins have got to be active for a certain amount of time each month, so to say 2909:

what I was trying to state is what I do outside of Knowledge not on Knowledge), secondary sources meaning that it is not original research which negates the argument which you seem to be making that I feel I am above the system. For a finite example of how I have attempted to enforce non-original research you can see

2705:

process as-well-as keeps plagiarism down a bit. As for the earlier issue, again I was going with what seemed like Knowledge policy, if the policies were to change which I think I would like to be in on with the discussion, I would certainly change my votes. I just felt I should clarify my votes there.--

1664:. First, it's important to have expert admins in all fields to help sort out issues that arise from that family of articles. A chef is as much a specialist in his field as literature scholars in theirs. Second, no evidence that this is anything but a smart and kind editor and a good collaborator. -- 2397:

I appreciate your opinion, but honestly it is just to help out the project as we don't have many active admin. in the WikiProject Food and Drink to help out with some of the issues I had stated above. I really don't look at Knowledge as a place for me to get power. I have a highly successful career

815:

I will admit that one was a challenge at times, but as I read someone on Knowledge once, the best way to deal with issues is to step away from the screen and take a breath and come back clear headed, now obviously I can't tell people to do that, but when things get too rough there are tools available

789:

I have not been there yet and would certainly like to assist there, I would especially like to help others decide what a proper secondary resource is. Many people believe that just because it is written in a book or on a website it is true. it is important to read and understand the authors sources

728:

should not be allowed within Knowledge since it can introduce factual errors to readers, so that Knowledge could lose its credibility. Unfortunately many food related articles contain factual errors stemmed from such practices or are not referenced at all. My question is how do you manage such people

666:

I think perhaps it may of been bad judgment more than abuse. I certainly would not of made the choice to do such a prank as it would seen unproductive to Knowledge as no one else knew their reasoning. If some sort of April Fool's jokes were to be undertaken by administrators, it should be done with

547:

If you were asked to review a block (according to the log, blocked for "personal attacks"), but in the editor's limited number of contributions, there are no personal attacks, but a large amount of edit-warring, how would you respond? What actions (if any) would you take? Assume the blocking admin is

420:

is a great idea, but those who sign it were probably not going to be rude in the process anyways. I'll be honest, other than warning people for being uncivil there aren't too many things I can think of unless they are being truly rude and then they should be blocked in the normal manner from editing

230:

article over the last approximate year. For the most part, I dealt with it with a level head and came back with the best conflict resolutions I could, using my sound background in academic research. At times my "opinion" were met with harsh criticism from one or two editors, but in time they ironed

2780:

Thank you for the polite clarification; I do, however, respectfully disagree with that interpretation of policy, but it does not mean that you have not done other work that I think has benefitted our project. How potential admins are likely to close AfDs is just a very important thing to me, because

2630:

Perhaps you misread some of my comments. The outcome of the RfC was that Kurt's votes were/are considered valid and not disruptive. That is a consensus of the community. The board elections are self-nom-only—there is no way Kurt could run for board without self nominating. Attacking him for doing so

834:

up until last month when Professor Pettid of the State University of new York at Binghamton wrote his text on the subject, so sometimes it is best to discuss with people to wait on writing about a subject until a proper source arises. We are working on writing a public encyclopedia, hopefully not a

629:

I view personal attacks, especially when they are obviously cultural in nature to be much more harsh, which to me are also an excess of incivility so in that case i would say that is one of the worst offenses. General incivility where a user consistently argues incoherently against a users edits on

374:

If you are referring to the article, I think it needs quite a bit of work including citations, changing of the list format to a narrative along with some other issues. If you are wondering how I feel about the competitions themselves, heck if someone wants to shove that much food into their gullet,

2908:

I think you are reading into the statement, again by reading each and every contribution I have ever made to Knowledge, you'll see that it is all made from properly sourced secondary, not primary resources (which would be original research which I do for my graduate degree and for my work which was

2655:

properly. The consensus on November 2007 is not the same of these days. (well, I could find so many complaints on his "power hunger" at his talk page and RFA talk pages though). Over two years, he has been producing the same opposing comment at RFA after his self-nom, so this issue has been ongoing

525:

I think that such a policy would be harmful because the user may have at one point made numerous great contributions but then became upset over some interaction with other users on an article and decided to vandalize said article or undergo a series of edit wars. Hopefully the user's earlier edits

2913:

along with the plethora of articles I just listed above which if you read through their entire history, I removed all of the original research and replaced it with sound academic secondary sources. About the only thing I could say was actually negative about the statement was that I might of been

2704:

I totally agree with you on the latter entry, but I was going along with Knowledge policy not my own personal feelings. Honestly someone like yourself and myself who have done graduate work are clearly capable of doing original research, the policy is meant to keep those who do not understand the

2646:

Perhaps you misread and refuse to understand what I'm saying. I don't misread the RFC on him and I've acknowledged his votes always to have taken as "valid". However, regardless of the validity, many people have considered his behavior disruptive at the provided links above. The community is not a

1000:

It might be inappropriate. But I think asking candidates how they would cut down the rancor associated with RfAs, RfBs etc is quite reasonable. For example, my draft proposal might very well be flawed, and explaining how and why it is flawed would produce valuable information on which to judge the

590:

I think it would be important to note to the blocking admin. that an error may of occurred in the block, but I alos feel that the block should be discussed with the blocking admin. not just removed. I don't think any sort of reprimand is in order unless there is an obvious case of bias toward the

81:

which is the parent project of the wine project, and I decided my efforts were better spent concentrated there. In the time I have been with the project I have completely updated the project page for visual appeal and ease of use. I have moderated discussion on the project's talk page as well as

619:

Incivility is damaging to the process of improving Knowledge as it may keep editors that would otherwise have made great contributions to an article from doing so. Not everyone has as thick of a skin as some of us may who can make a decent argument against what is essentially an "internet bully"

3185:

While there is no reason to think you will abuse the tools, new administrators should avoid administering in subject areas they edit, to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. Given that you are a specialty editor, you won't have much need for the tools. I encourage you to spread your

2955:

The intention was meant that people from within the project would be able to contact me that already know me for help with issues such as page protection and others as I know the issues with greater clarity in the subject of Food and Drink rather than someone from outside of my expertise and the

2875:

to change the Knowledge logo? It's pretty clear to me that the Chef understands the difference between his real world capabilities, and what is and is not permitted on Knowledge. Even if his wording was unclear in this one particular instance, it's clear from his lengthy editing record that he

732:

This is hard in many cases because it would mean deleting a large amount of articles from Knowledge. This is why we have "fact tags" which will point out that either an individual statement is questionable without a citation or we can tag an entire article with a banner stating that the article

125:

As a final note, looking at my edit history from the last three months you will note that I had very few edits compared to other months. I was working dillegently on my thesis while teaching two classes in a culinary school. Early in the semester one of the instructors went out on leave due to

86:

that goes out to our members which is exactly twelve months old as of this month (June). Since I became a member and spread the presence of the project through Knowledge, our membership has gone from sixteen members to thirty-nine when I last applied for Admin. and it is now up to eighty-four.

1078:

I don't want to be specific on my thesis as I plan to have it published but it has to do with studying the foodways of during the American Revolution in the New York colony. I'm hoping to get it published in the journal Food, Culture, and Society which I am currently reviewing another article

820:

which gave everyone a few days to walk away and work on something else and as you probably noticed the edit warring ceased as people found better things to do and then it gave us the ability to give sound suggestions as to how to fix the issues without arguing, which was to use sound secondary

2781:

an AfD that results in delete can undo maybe even years of work by numerous editors and so it is something I think needs to be considered very carefully, i.e. when we absolutely think there is no chance whatsoever that the article under discussion can be improved further. Sincerely, --

415:

To be honest, we can add as many policies as we want to Knowledge but people will still be uncivil when they want to. That is part of the internet environment where anonymity has given some people the feeling that they can be rude to people as they will never meet them. I the

591:

editor that the admin. blocked. Just because a person becomes an admin. doesn't mean they do not have the capability to use those abilities to damage the integrity of the project, and if the admin. if attacking the user then the admin. should have his status reviewed.--

2956:

projects and its subsidiaries. My interaction has never been to subvert another users proper edits, rather to promote civility and proper publishing of well documented and non-pov encyclopedia articles. If you look at the "contentious" areas such as issues with the

2964:

articles, I have always used consensus to garner the trust of other editors, all be it with stating my specifics of knowledge with hopes to convince people, always in the end the decisions have been made with the best interest of Knowledge and by following all the

292:

as I only had eight reports, I have familiarized myself more with the policies have reported forty vandals (not so many the last few months as I have been writing my thesis and teaching full-time). Another issue was that I did not have sufficient experience with

3044:

I maybe changing from Netural to Opposed based on the most recent reply regarding Original Research which appears to be saying this he belives it is acceptable if the editor is qualified to do so. Waiting for his reply prior to actually changing my position.

1157:

I believe the user in question is fairly trustworthy. After a review of his contributions, I haven't found anything to strongly suggest he would abuse the tools. A fine example of a "one-topic" specialist editor. I am not 100% satisfied with the tagging for

309:

as well as some other articles, always in what I feel is a clear headed manner. I have also continued to work toward improving the WikiProjects I work with along with numerous articles which either I have created in that time or brought up to a higher

2890:

I understand, Jay, but my concern is mainly that when he said "the policy is meant to keep those who do not understand the process as-well-as keeps plagiarism down a bit" sounds like he thinks the OR rule does not apply to him, or certain other areas.

526:

would've been seen by other users and would've been reverted earlier if they were vandalizing or against Knowledge policies, but a review of that users prior edits would probably be the best action and then action taken not just a blanketed reversal.--

375:

all the more power to them. I do however find it a sign of the American diet of mass consumption for quantity over quality, but sometimes there is some quality in there I suppose. The competitions I judge are of a more fine-dining cuisine standard.--

2852:

where I have commented on the information coming directly from the Bible instead of secondary sources, I have made similar comments on other articles as well. The word "capable" used in this context means personal skill, not the action of

2803:- Your reply about original research has me very, very worried. I notice that you have clarified, but I see no way that your original response could have meant that. If you can convince me otherwise, I will definitely change to support. 265:- One of the main reasons your last RfA wasn't successful, was because that the participators felt that you didn't have sufficient experience to become an administrator. How and why do you think you've now overcome that obstacle? 2750:

Thank you for the clarification, I suggest you be a bit more careful in your choice of words, remembering that is is a RfA and not a user's talk page. As written, it clearly raised a major issue. Thank you for clearing that up.

554:

I would look at the nature of the edit warring and see what the nature of the edits were. Edit warring can have personal attacks inside of them based upon cultural issues such as issues with cultural food taboos like

2735:

You misunderstood my statement, I meant that he and I personal have the "ability" outside of Knowledge, but Knowledge is not the place to use original research. I was attempting to compliment him on his graduate

663:: were the perpetrators using bad judgment by "abusing" their admin powers, or were the blockers using bad judgment by implementing unwarned, almost uncalled for (as the "pranks" were relatively harmless) blocks? 1622:

to nominate Tanner-Christopher should he decide to run again. He would have been very welcome to take me up on my offer. I believe he has the right mix of experience and temperament to make a fine administrator.

3001:- current edit history seems to show a lack of envolvement. 3 months of very few edits followed by one month of activity. I would think that an administrator would be a bit more consistant in his activity. 612:

What effect does incivility among contributors have on Knowledge achieving its purpose (and what is that purpose)? Is incivility treated more seriously than other policy violations? Why do you think so?

130:

competitions or judging them myself, writing for the local newspaper, and doing a monthly tv segment for a local TV channel so Knowledge and my personal food blog took a back seat for a few months.

1431:

I looked through a fair few of your contributions and can't see any obvious problems. Though you don't have much experience at AfD I still trust you to make appropriate, consensus based closes.

443:

I have to admit, this is a pretty rational response, all things considered. I would like to think there is more that could be done, but maybe you are correct. Maybe nothing more can be done.--

301:

deletion proposals in the last nine months. I have also familiarized myself with a number of policies through a number of issues that have risen in edit issues as noted in the comments about

3223: 856: 3094:- As stated, it is just my POV, and I will agree that it is stricter that what appears to be the accepted standard, which is why this remains as a neutral vote instead of an opposed vote. 83: 289: 167: 660: 2820:

If you look at all of my work and comments I have made on talk pages for articles, I have always used secondary sources and kept people from using primary sources. Please check

872: 298: 3034:- Definately explains the time off, but I would personally expect more than a one month return, just my point of view, and also why I posted as neutral rather than as opposed. 2451: 1619: 149:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

867: 2841: 630:

a page is more of a nuisance and can be dealt with in other ways by editors using the tools I mentioned earlier (Request for Comment, Page Protection, Arbitration, etc.)--

195: 194:

articles with some being brought up to GA status and others working toward that process. Just to show I do not stick to just food and culture, I also created the article

1685:. Great editor; does the hard stuff (i.e., research) and remains civil. The project needs more foodie admins (and level-headed, helpful content experts, in general).-- 243:

can be given for consideration, and in time the articles can be worked together with a decent amount of civility to get the article to a better laevel like it is now at

1297:- Based on his work on the WPFood project, I believe Chris to be dedicated to improving WP by ensuring articles are truly well researched and of the highest quality. -- 2288:

Sure, if you're crazy enough to want the bit. I actually would have nominated the good chef myself had I known he was interested in adminship. From a chocolate lover,

220:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

3015:- please read his explanation above, as he was busy finishing his graduate thesis as well as being busy with a heavy teaching load. He has just recently returned. -- 2719:

Your reply here is making me change my view from neutral to oppose. Original Research has no place in Knowledge. Hopefully I am reading your reply incorrectly, but

900: 812:, especially dog meat section. I think there would be similar disputes in other food articles. How would you meditate such issues with what standard in the future? 913: 198:, although I have not brought it up to GA status, it is a gosh darn good article in my opinion. I have also maintained a level of "featured" status on the 77:

in February of 2007 as I was taking a graduate class in wine history and found some of the articles to be missing relevant data. Shortly after, I found the

3241: 907: 783: 2943:) to use the admin tools specifically for WikiProject Food and Drink, which includes contentious subject areas in which he has been deeply involved. — 2350:

Clearly has addressed the issues from last RfA. My interactions have all been positive and I trust him with the tools. Level headed and good member. —

1176: 1690: 2545: 2413: 960: 893: 688:

If given the chance, would you take part in any "pranks" or "jokes" that involved your administrative powers on Knowledge, even if they were small?

67: 584:

Given that blocks can be (and often are) undone, would you say that it doesn't matter too much if a mistake is made (in making a block)? Discuss.

2867:

Asenine, I, for one, find his clarification completely plausible, because of the word "capable". Imagine if I said: as an artist I am clearly

2605: 2582: 171: 2114: 475: 973:

Regarding Filll's question (#6), is it really fair to have people judge the candidate on his/her views of your personal sub-page proposal?--

943: 1686: 1261:

Good editor. Good response to my question--I meant competitive eating in general, but the critique of the Knowledge article seems valid.

937: 207: 78: 126:

illness and I filled in for four of his classes, so I was teaching six classes, writing my thesis and also traveling to either compete in

852: 1001:

reasoning ability of a candidate. After all, a successful candidate will be called on to make these kinds of judgements all the time. --

2549: 2076:

I'm impressed by his sincere and trustworthy answers as a future administrator as well as his outstanding contributions to Knowledge.--

2142: 1114: 417: 406: 87:

Although I am sure I am not the sole reason for this expansion, i would like to think I have played a part in it. I also update the

2783: 2691: 2519: 2204: 98:

My articles contributions are all in the realm of food and wine, but mostly food. My largest contributions so far have been on the

2651:-centered place unlike your implausible assertion, but always values "process" high by people. Besides, you seem to not understand 1515:- all of the concerns from the last RfA seem to have been more than adequately addressed. I see no reason not to trust this user. 1583:- I get a strong feeling that I can really trust this user. Excellent article work too, and extensive Wiki-project participation. 2845: 2568:

I see you only cast "oppose" at any RFA, and "keep" at any AFD. Anyone thinks that this behavior unproductive? At least, I do. --

2224: 1822: 358: 119: 33: 17: 1773: 294: 163: 288:- Well it has been nine months since I put in the last nomination, issues were that I did not have sufficient experience with 1977: 1919: 1562: 1247: 1047: 989: 3198: 1166: 240: 236: 232: 2978: 2919: 2858: 2741: 2710: 2494: 2450:

I don't know if this affects your opinion Kurt, but Tanner-Christopher has had a standing offer of a nomination from me

2409: 2310: 2093:

as the reasons I gave durign the first RFA have simply been enhanced with time. Good to see that you came back to RFA!--

1954: 1084: 887: 795: 758: 696: 672: 635: 596: 568: 531: 426: 380: 315: 135: 127: 61: 405:

What should be done to encourage calmer environments around RfAs and similar polls? For example, would you support the

2220: 1798: 2631:

is ridiculous. Attacking him for something he did over two years ago is equally ridiculous. I'm a strong believer in

3208: 3177: 3162: 3131: 3098: 3086: 3055: 3038: 3026: 3005: 2982: 2950: 2923: 2885: 2862: 2789: 2769: 2755: 2745: 2730: 2714: 2697: 2665: 2641: 2625: 2599: 2577: 2526: 2498: 2484: 2465: 2443: 2417: 2392: 2359: 2342: 2315: 2292: 2280: 2263: 2246: 2228: 2211: 2183: 2166: 2154: 2123: 2101: 2085: 2068: 2061: 2052: 2031: 2010: 1995: 1981: 1958: 1937: 1921: 1895: 1878: 1862: 1844: 1827: 1802: 1777: 1757: 1740: 1725: 1708: 1694: 1673: 1656: 1634: 1610: 1594: 1547: 1526: 1507: 1476: 1462: 1440: 1423: 1406: 1378: 1346: 1329: 1308: 1289: 1270: 1253: 1219: 1202: 1188: 1152: 1133: 1122: 1088: 1069: 1049: 1018: 991: 830:

An issue that may arise occasionally is that not all articles have secondary sources available which was a case for

762: 700: 676: 639: 600: 572: 535: 510: 460: 430: 384: 362: 319: 280: 139: 2632: 1790: 1398: 74: 498: 3202: 1541: 166:, I would assist in appropriately closing these articles. I have also familiarized myself with the process for 2894: 2806: 2120: 247:. That was rather lengthy, but I wanted to detail the depth of how far I worked to get this conflict resolved. 1849:

Support to help even out Asenine's "OR reply" oppose. May reconsider if Asenine decides to strike his oppose

2974: 2915: 2854: 2737: 2706: 2490: 2405: 1753: 1080: 1010: 883: 848: 791: 754: 692: 668: 631: 592: 564: 527: 452: 422: 376: 311: 131: 57: 2555:

Your all the same opposing rationale at any RFA is just like a bot-generated comment. That is not creative.

2661: 2621: 2573: 2136: 2117: 2081: 2065: 1933: 1702:. Impressive edits and per Q6. I like your respectful disagree. You're neither sucking up nor combative.-- 1266: 1182: 1107: 354: 170:

and would help to appropriately block or comment on vandals reported. I would also utilize the tools for

3067:

is a bit unfair. At least he is doing better than many current admins in terms of how active he is; take

3127: 3117: 2513: 2198: 2179: 1840: 1787: 1387: 1323: 506: 3222:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

1159: 2966: 2871:

of designing a new logo for Knowledge. Would you interpret my statement to mean that I believe I am

2721:"like yourself and myself who have done graduate work are clearly capable of doing original research" 2401: 1818: 1811: 1535: 1419: 1262: 1215: 350: 346: 3174: 2947: 2910: 2652: 2461: 2436: 2110: 2024: 1682: 1630: 1371: 1342: 1228: 729:

who habitually produce original research regardless of advices and warnings if you become a sysop?

786:

is a relatively new noticeboard to resolve such matters. So are you willing to help people there?

3082: 2970: 2881: 2355: 2045: 2007: 1971: 1914: 1721: 1669: 1590: 1497: 1458: 1237: 1138: 1042: 984: 956: 337: 266: 255: 2689:(verifiable information that does not advance a thesis is not original research). Sincerely, -- 774:

Aside for your food related articles and portals, your wiki space activities are mainly within

3194: 3021: 2765: 2657: 2617: 2569: 2276: 2132: 2077: 1929: 1858: 1737: 1654: 1521: 1355: 1303: 1284: 1195: 725: 710: 2593:

self-nomination; there is no procedure there by which one may be nominated. Sorry, no dice. —

3123: 3113: 2648: 2505: 2306: 2261: 2190: 2175: 2098: 2060:

Strong candidate and subject expert, sensible answers to questions and lack of drama. Meets

1950: 1836: 1716:

Brings a unique perspective to the project and understands the rules at the same time <3

1319: 750: 519:

What is your opinion regarding a policy requiring all edits by banned users to be reverted?

502: 491: 421:

as they are disrupting Knowledge as they would be doing in any other part of the project.--

2825: 2637: 2595: 2330: 2289: 1436: 1415: 1211: 1006: 738: 448: 305:

which is not limited to that article, the same can be said with the history of working on

103: 3171: 3072: 2957: 2944: 2849: 2829: 2821: 2456: 2425: 2254:

It seems per question 4, you have gained much more experience since your previous RFA.

2237: 2150: 1891: 1871: 1767: 1733:-- Our culinary articles definitely need work to them! Just the man for the job! = ) -- 1625: 1360: 1338: 1194:

Possibly the best way to come back from a failed first RfA. Well done and good luck.

1065: 831: 817: 809: 746: 742: 734: 302: 244: 227: 107: 99: 3235: 3158: 3077: 2877: 2544:

So Kurt, the power hunger comment is truly from your own sweet experiences with your

2351: 2109:, per perusal of contribs, and my previous reasoning with regards to adminship being 2040: 2004: 1967: 1904: 1717: 1703: 1665: 1585: 1556: 1489: 1472: 1449: 1032: 974: 779: 775: 721: 560: 3112:

Unconvinced - might need to add my own questions in the absence of anymore Q&A.

297:

but I have chimed in on the majority of those we have come up under the majority of

3187: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3068: 3016: 2761: 2724: 2608:

as 'the community disagree with "me". I could only find that the RFC was filed for

2471: 2379: 2272: 1909: 1870:

I view self-noms as indicative of someone eager to help improve the encyclopedia.

1854: 1734: 1647: 1604: 1516: 1298: 1279: 1037: 979: 649: 1173: 2301: 2255: 2094: 2039:

A trustworthy and committed encyclopedist. Sterling behavior and contributions.

1990: 1946: 1749: 1484:- Some nice work done by this editor, will not abuse tools, I view self-noms as 1337:

Opposer Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles makes a strong point, but for now Support.

1130: 203: 199: 115: 92: 88: 2686:(the yearly volumes of Britannica and almanacs cover notable news stories) and 1210:- trustworthy editor who has addressed the concerns from his previous request. 1060:

You are a graduate student? Sounds interesting... tell me about your thesis.

190:

As stated in my self description, I have numerous contributions in a number of

3095: 3052: 3046: 3035: 3002: 2752: 2727: 2325: 2163: 1432: 1002: 444: 397: 3216:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3141:. I don't think that "List of movies that take place in one day or less" is 2723:

has nothing to do with Knowledge. So I am questioning your understanding of

2146: 1945:

Excellent answers to all the questions, wonderful article-space work. - Dan

1887: 1061: 2470:

The fact that he chose not to take advantage of that makes it even worse.

733:

sounds like original research such as the banner I placed last November on

91:, which had been abandoned some months before hand and I also revamped the 1989:

I was on the fence last time around, I have a good feeling about it now.

3154: 556: 808:

You've done good jobs to resolve a series of disputes at the article of

816:

to use to promote that such as the temporary protection I requested on

191: 3226:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

1903:

per WJBscribe. Not the nomination offer part, but the other thing.--

239:

when editors can not stop warring and need time to cool down. Then

2848:

for evidence of my use of secondary sources. A perfect example is

959:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 2961: 2837: 2833: 306: 111: 1386:. I see no trust issues here, and I am pleased to support. ⇔ 1115: 1108: 2145:), great improvement, some wonderful quality contributions. 790:

and not just take them on face value.23:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

501:

might give some insight on how I look through it and decide.

1146: 274: 73:

I first started out with Knowledge editing articles for the

206:

up to "featured" status. I additionally have revamped the

1835:- completely convinced, per the Q&A I was assessing. 782:

and You expressed your concern on the original research.

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

1128:

01010011011101010111000001110000011011110111001001110100

184:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

2940: 2687: 2684: 2564: 2562: 2560: 2558: 2556: 1602:

Seems trustworthy, activity isnt that important to me.

1569: 1105:

Per you very impresive improvement since your last RFA.

931: 925: 919: 1810:- It seems that the extra time has served him well. -- 821:

sources written by academics who understand the issue.

2300:

I thought I already voted but I guess not. So there.

1488:

evidence of bravery and admirable self confidence. —

1470:- Good user, I don't care if it's a self-nomination. 478:

and post the answers here or a link to your answers.

2423:

No point arguing, he's entrenched in his opinion. –

497:Still on neutral so 4 questions for you to answer. 2842:History of commercial tobacco in the United States 226:I have had a number of stressful conflicts on the 196:History of commercial tobacco in the United States 1414:A vote of support gets with a free meal, yes? :) 1618:. Shortly after his last nomination was closed, 2760:No, it doesn't. You just didn't comprehend it. 210:along with a number of its subsidiary projects. 156:What admin work do you intend to take part in? 53:FINAL (64/3/4); closed 16:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 3145:. Each entry on the list is verifiable with a 1566: 691:No, I have better things to do with my time.-- 8: 873:Requests for adminship/Tanner-Christopher 2 2610:his problematic conducts by several people 2489:I simply forgot, it was nine months ago.-- 784:Knowledge:No original research/noticeboard 3153:(all points except 4, 9 and possibly 6). 1448:the user has a clue, a very good one :) - 868:Requests for adminship/Tanner-Christopher 2914:acting arrogant about my intelligence.-- 2653:Knowledge:Consensus#Consensus_can_change 961:Special:Contributions/Tanner-Christopher 955:Please keep discussion constructive and 162:As I have worked through the process of 2973:prescribed to the best of my ability.-- 2604:I do not understand your mispresenting 1853:if any serious concerns come to light. 865: 2782: 2690: 2606:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Kmweber 2256: 95:and brought it to "featured" status. 7: 3170:Switched from oppose (see above). — 2939:Concern: the candidate's intention ( 2540:evidence of power hunger. - Kmweber" 1031:Alright, sounds reasonable. Sorry.-- 659:What is your opinion on this years' 3065:I expect more than one month return 2219:Contributions are good no concerns. 2174:: good editor; sensible candidate. 864: 474:Answer two of the exercises at the 1782:...as a fellow "diligent" editor, 1681:. Encountered this fellow on the 24: 3242:Successful requests for adminship 2585:. His RfA was, wait for, it over 1162:(it should really be tagged with 328:Optional question from Keepscases 2846:Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies 2583:The community disagrees with you 1555:Trustworthy and deserving user. 120:Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 2337: 2331: 2326: 1687:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 1567: 1240: 1230: 1196: 2911:this comment on Jewish cuisine 2424: 1991: 1915: 1905: 1359: 1043: 1033: 985: 975: 881:Links for Tanner-Christopher: 855:. For the edit count, see the 290:intervention against vandalism 168:intervention against vandalism 1: 2546:self-nom for your RFA in 2005 2334: 1966:good 'pedia builder. Cheers, 1557: 1011: 453: 2785:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 2693:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 2188:Great work at WP:F&D. – 1910: 1354:— self-noms demonstrate the 1038: 980: 237:requests for page protection 128:American Culinary Federation 2378:evidence of power hunger. 1642:: He's definitely given us 1198:weburiedoursecretsinthepark 1183: 851:'s edit summary usage with 499:This vague incomplete thing 145:Questions for the candidate 3258: 3120:) 15:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 720:You said earlier that per 709:Optional Question(s) from 648:Optional Question(s) from 336:What are your thoughts on 208:WikiProject Food and Drink 79:WikiProject Food and Drink 2905:21:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 2817:17:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2762:Everyme (was Dorftrottel) 2698:16:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 2393:16:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1855:Everyme (was Dorftrottel) 1816: 1527:23:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1508:22:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1477:21:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1463:20:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1441:19:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1424:19:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1407:18:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1379:17:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1347:17:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1330:17:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1309:16:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1290:16:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1271:16:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1254:16:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1220:15:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1203:15:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1189:15:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1177:15:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1153:15:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1134:14:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1123:14:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1019:22:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 992:21:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 385:16:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 363:15:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 320:15:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 281:14:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 140:13:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 3219:Please do not modify it. 3209:14:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 3178:22:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 3163:14:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 3132:16:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 3099:20:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 3087:10:02, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 3056:02:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 3049:02:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 3039:01:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 3027:01:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 3006:00:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2983:22:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2951:21:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2924:23:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 2886:23:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2863:18:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2790:02:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2770:17:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 2756:02:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2746:02:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2731:02:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2715:02:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2666:12:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2642:12:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2626:12:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2600:09:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2578:23:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2527:04:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 2499:23:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2485:22:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2466:19:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2444:01:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2418:01:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2360:16:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2343:15:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2316:15:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2293:13:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2281:05:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2264:03:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2247:00:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 2229:21:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 2212:04:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 2184:14:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 2167:00:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 2155:21:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2124:20:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2102:16:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2086:15:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2069:15:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2053:04:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2032:21:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2011:21:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1996:06:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1982:05:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1959:02:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1938:01:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1922:01:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1896:22:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1879:20:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1863:17:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1845:16:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1828:16:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1803:14:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1778:14:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1758:13:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1741:09:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1726:05:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1709:02:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1695:00:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1674:23:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1657:19:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1635:19:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1611:17:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1595:10:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1548:03:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1089:03:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1070:03:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1050:00:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 763:23:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 701:15:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 677:15:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 640:13:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 601:13:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 573:13:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 536:13:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 511:07:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 461:14:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 431:01:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 396:Optional questions from 3051:Reply cleared the air. 2022:rubber-stamped oppose. 1683:Hors d'oeuvre talk page 1358:demanded of an admin. – 418:Peaceful Polling Pledge 407:Peaceful Polling Pledge 38:Please do not modify it 3075:as just two examples. 2589:. Board elections are 2374:— I view self-noms as 2221:Pharaoh of the Wizards 1534:- trustworthy editor. 241:level headed proposals 3149:. Rather the list is 3122:Switched to support. 2536:"I view self-noms as 1227:- Nice improvements. 295:articles for deletion 164:articles for deletion 34:request for adminship 1765:- looks good to me. 1748:, no reason not to. 1576:07-1-2008 • 05:19:55 1167:Non-free promotional 2550:2008 board election 2452:since last November 2111:not that big a deal 863:RfAs for this user: 661:April Fools' pranks 233:Request for Comment 2406:Tanner-Christopher 963:before commenting. 884:Tanner-Christopher 849:Tanner-Christopher 338:competitive eating 202:, and brought the 84:monthly newsletter 58:Tanner-Christopher 47:Tanner-Christopher 39: 3207: 3206: 3143:original research 3024: 2904: 2816: 2633:leaving him alone 2525: 2420: 2404:comment added by 2314: 2210: 1801: 1475: 1454: 1402: 1395: 1306: 1249: 1244: 1184:Mizu onna sango15 1160:Image:TimRyan.jpg 1151: 1014: 726:original research 548:away on holiday. 456: 365: 349:comment added by 279: 106:(Brought to GA), 102:(Brought to GA), 37: 3249: 3221: 3192: 3191: 3085: 3080: 3020: 2903: 2900: 2892: 2815: 2812: 2804: 2788: 2786: 2696: 2694: 2649:consequentialism 2522: 2516: 2511: 2508: 2481: 2478: 2464: 2442: 2439: 2433: 2430: 2399: 2389: 2386: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2328: 2323:- looks good. 2304: 2258: 2244: 2207: 2201: 2196: 2193: 2050: 2030: 1993: 1917: 1912: 1907: 1875: 1826: 1814: 1797: 1795: 1706: 1652: 1633: 1607: 1593: 1588: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1559: 1544: 1538: 1504: 1494: 1471: 1452: 1400: 1391: 1377: 1374: 1368: 1365: 1328: 1302: 1287: 1282: 1248: 1242: 1238: 1232: 1200: 1185: 1171: 1165: 1149: 1143: 1141: 1119: 1112: 1045: 1040: 1035: 1015: 1012: 987: 982: 977: 947: 906: 842:General comments 751:Japanese cuisine 492:User:Ncmvocalist 457: 454: 344: 277: 271: 269: 75:WikiProject Wine 3257: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3224:this nomination 3217: 3147:reliable source 3078: 3076: 2995: 2896: 2893: 2876:understands. -- 2826:Italian cuisine 2808: 2805: 2784: 2692: 2520: 2514: 2506: 2479: 2476: 2455: 2437: 2431: 2426: 2387: 2384: 2368: 2238: 2236:, no problems. 2205: 2199: 2191: 2046: 2023: 2018:- To balance a 1873: 1812: 1791: 1776: 1704: 1648: 1646:for thought. -- 1624: 1605: 1586: 1584: 1568: 1565: 1542: 1537:Masterpiece2000 1536: 1498: 1490: 1394: 1372: 1366: 1361: 1317: 1316:. Good luck. 1285: 1280: 1252: 1243: 1169: 1163: 1145: 1139: 1099: 970: 899: 882: 878: 844: 739:Italian cuisine 490:Questions from 476:AGF Challenge 2 273: 267: 172:page protection 147: 104:Italian cuisine 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3255: 3253: 3245: 3244: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3212: 3211: 3180: 3165: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3061:Reply to Dbiel 3041: 2994: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2958:Korean cuisine 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2850:Jewish cuisine 2830:Korean cuisine 2822:French cuisine 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2566: 2553: 2542: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2501: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2345: 2318: 2295: 2283: 2266: 2249: 2231: 2214: 2186: 2169: 2157: 2126: 2104: 2088: 2074:Strong Support 2071: 2055: 2037:Strong Support 2034: 2013: 1998: 1984: 1961: 1940: 1924: 1898: 1881: 1865: 1847: 1833:Strong support 1830: 1805: 1780: 1772: 1760: 1743: 1728: 1711: 1697: 1676: 1659: 1637: 1613: 1597: 1578: 1561: 1550: 1529: 1510: 1479: 1465: 1443: 1426: 1409: 1392: 1381: 1349: 1332: 1311: 1292: 1273: 1256: 1239: 1235: 1222: 1205: 1192: 1179: 1155: 1136: 1125: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1073: 1072: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 995: 994: 969: 966: 952: 951: 950: 948: 877: 876: 875: 870: 862: 861: 860: 853:mathbot's tool 843: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 832:Korean cuisine 825: 824: 823: 822: 818:Korean cuisine 810:Korean cuisine 802: 801: 800: 799: 768: 767: 766: 765: 747:Korean cuisine 743:French cuisine 735:Jewish cuisine 706: 705: 704: 703: 682: 681: 680: 679: 645: 644: 643: 642: 624: 623: 622: 621: 606: 605: 604: 603: 578: 577: 576: 575: 541: 540: 539: 538: 495: 494: 487: 486: 485: 484: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 436: 435: 434: 433: 400: 392: 390: 389: 388: 387: 342: 341: 325: 324: 323: 322: 303:Korean cuisine 299:food and drink 283: 258: 254:Question from 251: 250: 249: 248: 245:Korean cuisine 228:Korean cuisine 214: 213: 212: 211: 178: 177: 176: 175: 146: 143: 108:Korean cuisine 100:French cuisine 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3254: 3243: 3240: 3239: 3237: 3227: 3225: 3220: 3214: 3213: 3210: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3169: 3166: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3119: 3115: 3110: 3100: 3097: 3093: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3084: 3081: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3048: 3042: 3040: 3037: 3033: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3023: 3018: 3014: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3004: 3000: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967:WP:guidelines 2963: 2959: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2949: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2912: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2899: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2813: 2811: 2802: 2801:Strong oppose 2799: 2791: 2787: 2779: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2754: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2688: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2640: 2639: 2634: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2614:November 2007 2611: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2592: 2588: 2587:two years ago 2584: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2565: 2563: 2561: 2559: 2557: 2554: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2541: 2537: 2534: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2517: 2510: 2509: 2502: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2482: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2440: 2434: 2429: 2422: 2421: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2390: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2346: 2344: 2341: 2340: 2329: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2284: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2259: 2253: 2250: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2242: 2235: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2215: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2202: 2195: 2194: 2187: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2170: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2131:, agree with 2130: 2127: 2125: 2122: 2119: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2067: 2064:. Good luck. 2063: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2035: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2006: 2002: 1999: 1997: 1994: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1962: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1928: 1925: 1923: 1920: 1918: 1913: 1908: 1902: 1899: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1800: 1799:(and friends) 1796: 1794: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1779: 1775: 1770: 1769: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1707: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1651: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1592: 1589: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1571: 1564: 1560: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1545: 1539: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1505: 1503: 1502: 1495: 1493: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1397: 1396: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1375: 1369: 1364: 1357: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1327: 1325: 1321: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1283: 1277: 1274: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1234: 1233: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1199: 1193: 1190: 1186: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1168: 1161: 1156: 1154: 1148: 1142: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1113: 1111: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1041: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1020: 1016: 1008: 1004: 999: 998: 997: 996: 993: 990: 988: 983: 978: 972: 971: 967: 965: 964: 962: 958: 949: 945: 942: 939: 936: 933: 930: 927: 924: 921: 918: 915: 912: 909: 905: 902: 898: 895: 892: 889: 885: 880: 879: 874: 871: 869: 866: 858: 854: 850: 846: 845: 841: 833: 829: 828: 827: 826: 819: 814: 813: 811: 807: 804: 803: 797: 793: 788: 787: 785: 781: 777: 773: 770: 769: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 731: 730: 727: 723: 719: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 702: 698: 694: 690: 689: 687: 684: 683: 678: 674: 670: 665: 664: 662: 658: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 641: 637: 633: 628: 627: 626: 625: 618: 615: 614: 611: 608: 607: 602: 598: 594: 589: 586: 585: 583: 580: 579: 574: 570: 566: 562: 561:vegetarianism 558: 553: 550: 549: 546: 543: 542: 537: 533: 529: 524: 521: 520: 518: 515: 514: 513: 512: 508: 504: 500: 493: 489: 488: 483: 480: 479: 477: 473: 470: 469: 462: 458: 450: 446: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 432: 428: 424: 419: 414: 411: 410: 408: 404: 401: 399: 395: 394: 393: 386: 382: 378: 373: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 339: 335: 332: 331: 330: 329: 321: 317: 313: 308: 304: 300: 296: 291: 287: 284: 282: 276: 270: 264: 261: 260: 259: 257: 253: 252: 246: 242: 238: 234: 229: 225: 222: 221: 219: 216: 215: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 186: 185: 183: 180: 179: 173: 169: 165: 161: 158: 157: 155: 152: 151: 150: 144: 142: 141: 137: 133: 129: 123: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 94: 90: 85: 80: 76: 71: 69: 66: 63: 59: 55: 54: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3218: 3215: 3182: 3167: 3138: 3111: 3091: 3064: 3060: 3043: 3031: 3022:Blah blah... 3012: 2998: 2935: 2934: 2897: 2895: 2872: 2868: 2809: 2807: 2800: 2720: 2680: 2658:Caspian blue 2636: 2618:Caspian blue 2613: 2609: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2570:Caspian blue 2539: 2535: 2512: 2504: 2475: 2457: 2427: 2383: 2375: 2371: 2347: 2324: 2320: 2297: 2285: 2268: 2251: 2240: 2239: 2233: 2216: 2197: 2189: 2171: 2159: 2139: 2133:Gears of War 2128: 2106: 2090: 2078:Caspian blue 2073: 2066:Orderinchaos 2057: 2047: 2041: 2036: 2026: 2019: 2015: 2000: 1986: 1974: 1963: 1942: 1930:Sumoeagle179 1926: 1900: 1883: 1872: 1867: 1850: 1832: 1807: 1792: 1783: 1766: 1762: 1745: 1730: 1713: 1699: 1678: 1661: 1649: 1643: 1639: 1626: 1615: 1603: 1599: 1580: 1575: 1552: 1531: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1500: 1499: 1491: 1485: 1481: 1467: 1451: 1445: 1428: 1411: 1399: 1389: 1383: 1362: 1351: 1335:Weak Support 1334: 1318: 1313: 1304:Blah blah... 1294: 1275: 1258: 1229: 1224: 1207: 1197: 1127: 1116: 1109: 1106: 1102: 954: 953: 940: 934: 928: 922: 916: 910: 903: 896: 890: 805: 771: 717: 711:Caspian blue 708: 707: 685: 656: 647: 646: 616: 609: 587: 581: 551: 544: 522: 516: 496: 481: 471: 412: 402: 391: 371: 343: 333: 327: 326: 285: 262: 223: 217: 187: 181: 159: 153: 148: 124: 97: 72: 64: 56: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3124:Ncmvocalist 3114:Ncmvocalist 2975:Chef Tanner 2971:WP:Policies 2916:Chef Tanner 2855:Chef Tanner 2738:Chef Tanner 2707:Chef Tanner 2538:prima facie 2507:thedemonhog 2503:Um… how? – 2491:Chef Tanner 2400:—Preceding 2376:prima facie 2192:thedemonhog 2176:Jonathunder 2062:my criteria 2020:prima facie 1837:Ncmvocalist 1486:prima facie 1320:Malinaccier 1081:Chef Tanner 792:Chef Tanner 755:Chef Tanner 693:Chef Tanner 669:Chef Tanner 632:Chef Tanner 593:Chef Tanner 565:Chef Tanner 528:Chef Tanner 503:Ncmvocalist 423:Chef Tanner 377:Chef Tanner 345:—Preceding 312:Chef Tanner 204:Wine Portal 200:Food Portal 132:Chef Tanner 116:Charcuterie 93:Wine Portal 89:Food Portal 2472:Kurt Weber 2380:Kurt Weber 1874:RGTraynor 1813:Explodicle 1501:Who's Bad? 1416:Ecoleetage 1263:Keepscases 1212:PhilKnight 968:Discussion 398:User:Filll 351:Keepscases 31:successful 3172:Athaenara 3151:listcruft 3073:Phaedriel 2945:Athaenara 2736:degree.-- 2241:Wizardman 1768:Jauerback 1620:I offered 1339:America69 1286:(mailbox) 926:block log 857:talk page 310:standard. 3236:Category 3199:contribs 3183:Neutral. 3168:Neutral. 2898:Asenine 2878:JayHenry 2853:doing.-- 2810:Asenine 2414:contribs 2402:unsigned 2352:Becksguy 2311:contribs 2143:contribs 2025:Channel 2005:Garion96 1978:contribs 1968:Casliber 1955:mistakes 1868:Support: 1788:Diligent 1718:Juppiter 1705:Lenticel 1666:JayHenry 1558:Yamakiri 1356:boldness 1278:Best, -- 1231:Wisdom89 1103:Support. 894:contribs 557:dog meat 359:contribs 347:unsigned 68:contribs 3188:davidwr 3139:Neutral 3069:ElinorD 3013:Comment 2999:Neutral 2993:Neutral 2936:Oppose. 2873:allowed 2869:capable 2348:Support 2321:Support 2298:Support 2286:Support 2273:Merzbow 2269:Support 2252:Support 2234:Support 2217:Support 2172:Support 2160:Support 2129:Support 2121:Jameson 2107:Support 2091:Support 2058:Support 2016:Support 2001:Support 1987:Support 1964:Support 1943:Support 1927:Support 1901:Support 1884:Support 1808:Support 1793:Terrier 1784:support 1763:Support 1746:Support 1735:Cameron 1731:Support 1714:Support 1700:Support 1679:Support 1662:Support 1650:Bedford 1640:Support 1616:Support 1606:MBisanz 1600:Support 1581:Support 1553:Support 1532:Support 1513:Support 1492:Realist 1482:Support 1468:Support 1450:Icĕwedg 1446:Support 1429:Support 1412:Support 1384:Support 1352:Support 1314:Support 1295:Support 1276:Support 1259:Support 1225:Support 1208:Support 1097:Support 901:deleted 650:Flaming 192:cuisine 3203:e-mail 3017:Jeremy 2681:Oppose 2612:as of 2480:Colts! 2462:scribe 2388:Colts! 2372:Oppose 2366:Oppose 2302:SWik78 2095:chaser 2008:(talk) 1992:Keegan 1947:Dank55 1750:Stifle 1631:scribe 1299:Jeremy 1140:Rudget 1131:Naerii 1117:Of War 1079:for.-- 780:WP:AIV 776:WP:AFD 749:, and 724:, any 722:WP:NOR 268:Rudget 256:Rudget 3096:Dbiel 3092:Reply 3083:drama 3053:Dbiel 3047:Dbiel 3036:Dbiel 3032:Reply 3003:Dbiel 2753:Dbiel 2728:Dbiel 2725:WP:OR 2638:Giggy 2596:Giggy 2521:edits 2432:cidic 2327:jj137 2290:Sarah 2257:tabor 2206:edits 2164:BillC 2048:Tucky 1774:dude. 1591:drama 1433:RMHED 1367:cidic 1174:Ali'i 1110:Gears 1003:Filll 957:civil 908:count 445:Filll 235:, or 16:< 3195:talk 3159:talk 3128:talk 3118:talk 3071:and 2979:talk 2969:and 2962:Chef 2941:here 2920:talk 2882:talk 2859:talk 2838:Chef 2834:Food 2766:talk 2742:talk 2711:talk 2683:per 2662:talk 2622:talk 2591:only 2574:talk 2548:and 2515:talk 2495:talk 2438:talk 2428:xeno 2410:talk 2356:talk 2335:talk 2307:talk 2277:talk 2225:talk 2200:talk 2180:talk 2151:talk 2147:Cirt 2137:talk 2118:Dean 2082:talk 1972:talk 1951:talk 1934:talk 1916:Dude 1906:Koji 1892:talk 1888:Bwrs 1859:talk 1841:talk 1754:talk 1722:talk 1691:talk 1670:talk 1644:food 1543:talk 1518:Sher 1473:macy 1459:ťalķ 1437:talk 1420:talk 1373:talk 1363:xeno 1343:talk 1324:talk 1281:Eric 1267:talk 1216:talk 1147:logs 1085:talk 1066:talk 1062:Bwrs 1044:Dude 1034:Koji 1007:talk 986:Dude 976:Koji 938:rfar 920:logs 888:talk 847:See 796:talk 778:and 759:talk 697:talk 673:talk 636:talk 597:talk 569:talk 559:and 532:talk 507:talk 449:talk 427:talk 381:talk 355:talk 316:talk 307:Chef 275:logs 136:talk 112:Food 62:talk 3201:)/( 3197:)/( 3155:Axl 3079:Lra 2960:or 2635:. — 2458:WjB 2042:Van 1886:. 1851:and 1627:WjB 1587:Lra 1523:eth 1013:wpc 944:spi 914:AfD 806:16. 772:15. 718:14. 686:13. 657:12. 610:11. 582:10. 455:wpc 3238:: 3175:✉ 3161:) 3130:) 3025:) 2981:) 2948:✉ 2922:) 2884:) 2861:) 2844:, 2840:, 2836:, 2832:, 2828:, 2824:, 2768:) 2744:) 2713:) 2664:) 2624:) 2576:) 2518:• 2497:) 2483:) 2477:Go 2454:. 2416:) 2412:• 2391:) 2385:Go 2358:) 2309:• 2279:) 2271:- 2227:) 2203:• 2182:) 2162:— 2153:) 2115:S. 2113:. 2097:- 2084:) 2027:® 2003:- 1980:) 1957:) 1953:)( 1936:) 1894:) 1861:) 1843:) 1786:- 1756:) 1724:) 1693:) 1672:) 1546:) 1506:) 1461:) 1439:) 1422:) 1405:@ 1401:dt 1345:) 1307:) 1269:) 1246:/ 1218:) 1187:/ 1181:-- 1170:}} 1164:{{ 1087:) 1068:) 1017:) 1009:| 932:lu 761:) 745:, 741:, 699:) 675:) 638:) 617:A. 599:) 588:A. 571:) 552:A. 545:9. 534:) 523:A. 517:8. 509:) 482:A. 472:7. 459:) 451:| 429:) 413:A. 409:? 403:6. 383:) 372:A: 361:) 357:• 334:Q: 318:) 286:A: 263:Q: 224:A: 218:3. 188:A: 182:2. 160:A: 154:1. 138:) 118:, 114:, 110:, 36:. 3205:) 3193:( 3190:/ 3157:( 3126:( 3116:( 3019:( 2977:( 2918:( 2880:( 2857:( 2764:( 2740:( 2709:( 2660:( 2620:( 2572:( 2552:? 2493:( 2474:( 2441:) 2435:( 2408:( 2382:( 2354:( 2338:) 2332:( 2313:) 2305:( 2275:( 2260:- 2223:( 2178:( 2149:( 2140:· 2135:( 2099:t 2080:( 1975:· 1970:( 1949:( 1932:( 1911:† 1890:( 1857:( 1839:( 1825:) 1823:C 1821:/ 1819:T 1817:( 1771:/ 1752:( 1738:* 1720:( 1689:( 1668:( 1570:§ 1563:C 1540:( 1496:( 1457:( 1453:Ё 1435:( 1418:( 1393:S 1390:Æ 1388:∫ 1376:) 1370:( 1341:( 1326:) 1322:( 1301:( 1265:( 1251:) 1241:T 1236:( 1214:( 1191:. 1150:) 1144:( 1083:( 1064:( 1039:† 1005:( 981:† 946:) 941:· 935:· 929:· 923:· 917:· 911:· 904:· 897:· 891:· 886:( 859:. 798:) 794:( 757:( 753:. 695:( 671:( 634:( 595:( 567:( 530:( 505:( 447:( 425:( 379:( 353:( 340:? 314:( 278:) 272:( 174:. 134:( 65:· 60:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Tanner-Christopher 2 - Knowledge

Index