624:
to bring the format up to
Knowledge standards, and you need to meet Notability by providing footnotes to reliable, vetted sources (online newspapers, major music industry websites, reviews, books, etc.). Until then the article can't go live; if it does, it'll meet Speedy Deletion criteria for "band with no Notability evidenced" and disappear. Feel free to post back here for discussion or further questions; you don't need to start a new RfF unless many days have gone by.
811:(also worth reading), you have to have at bare minimum two sources from mainstream books, news articles, etc. which are unaffiliated with the subject but discuss it. If you can find, say, an LA Times article discussing the planned event, that would work. Not press releases, not fansites, not forums, blogs, Facebook, etc. Please read the two main policies linked, and that'll give you a feel for what has to change for your article to publish.
438:? Further, all your footnotes thus far are government sources; try and find a few uninvolved/neutral descriptions of the program, its pros and cons, etc. in academic or news publications online (check GoogleBooks as well). Finally, your intro needs to make the where/when more explicit, as it isn't until the end of the sentence that a reader sees this is for the UK (and don't abbreviate "UK" in articles ;) ). Fix those and you should be set.
253:. It's a not a judgement of how good/interesting a film is, it's whether established sources have written about it. Fortunately, you appear to meet the latter, with a Guardian review and an article at what appears to be a reputable online film magazine. Fix the categories, and then I'd say you're clear to publish. Note that you can also upload
131:
606:
310:. Monkey News, 14 April 2011" with a clickable blue link, but the original link will still be visible in editing so it won't get lost. Looks a lot cleaner, no? Also you need to add Categories, but while the page is in draft form make sure to disarm your categories by adding a colon after the intial brackets: ]. Read
613:
Not ready for publication yet. The format is quite far from
Knowledge format; take a glance at a few other well-established articles, note how WP articles have a "lede" (intro), are divided into sections, etc. It's a good practice to look at another article and hit "Edit" just to see how they coded
623:
government/business/media announcement blogs), forums, etc. Next, several of your footnotes don't actually provide evidence, they just note that the Favela Chic club happens to exist and have a website; not at all the same thing as documenting that the band played a show there. So, overall you need
618:
for guidelines. Your footnoting is also off: first off, you don't footnote other
Knowledge articles, you just put double-brackets around them to create an internal link. Secondly, MySpace, YouTube, etc. aren't footnotable since they're user-generated content which doesn't go through any vetting;
802:
The article is nowhere near to being rendered in neutral, objetive prose. For example: "Tradesmen contribute so meaningfully to our lives in so many ways. From building our homes, schools, and churches; to keeping our cars running; to keeping our lights on and keeping us warm; to fixing our leaky
549:
also ask for help on any serious marihuana enthusiast internet forum you may belong to, but that could be a real risk as you might get totally non wiki-savvy people coming in trying to "help" and just messing up your format, adding uncited content, or POV editorial comments like "EVERYBODY GET OUT
762:
I made several edits to the
National Tradesmen Day page in attempt to get the "This article is written like an advertisement" warning removed. Can you please review the current post and if it meets the requirements, remove the warning banner and publish it publicly. If more changes are necessary,
381:, as in "Ireland" and "Medicine" are too broad, but whatever cats are something like "Medical associations in Ireland", "Charitable associations in Northern Ireland", "Organisations established in 1993", etc. Try looking at some well-established pages for similar organisations to see what cats
99:
I just reviewed it from the format side; just needed a category and some minor format tweaks. I say you're good to go and move it out of drafting into the article space; or let me know to do it for you if you don't know how. I see you tried unsuccessfully to add images; maybe check out
550:
AND VOTE FOR THIS ON 8 SEPTEMBER!!!! THIS YEAR WE GOT IT!!!" So, just a few options, ranging from most conservative to most edgy. You're definitely beyond the need for technical feedback from generic RfF volunteers, you just need to find a few more expert collaborators. Good luck!
894:
Article about 'The Other Guys', an a cappella group from St
Andrews University who have recently posted a video of "Royal Romance" on YouTube and is on the verge of going viral. The group have subsequently been on various different news programmes in the UK.
544:
do is maybe look at the
History tabs of some major articles on cannabis and cannabis law, see which editors are heavily involved in those, and paste a "hey, can you check out my page?" message onto their Talk page to ask for their individual help. You
161:
Yep, you're good to go. Give Google a few days to catch up, and your article should start showing up in Google hits too. Are you going to be sticking around
Knowledge to write about more architecture? You might want to drop into the Talk page of
76:
477:
Overall solid content, but format needs work. I've tagged the top of the article with things you need to fix; note they have links to the instruction guidelines for fixing them. The main issue is that you want to footnote
261:. Just make sure you carefully source the image, select the proper Fair Use criteria from the drop-down menu, and upload it directly to en.wikipedia rather than to WikiCommmons (which is for truly Public Domain images).
425:
Couple things: you want to format your footnotes and
External links so that they're full citations with clickable links. Check out any long-established WP article to see how clean footnotes are done, and/or read
968:
I was hoping you could please tell me if you have anymore feedback? I'd like to see the two nasty boxes at the top of the page disappear, so I am happy to comply with your recommendations if you have any more.
430:. Also, you may want to check around the categories used for surveys/censuses and see if you can find some good, specific categories where other Cost of Living indices are groups together. Maybe somewhere in
368:
you need at least two footnotes sources which are unbiased and unrelated to the subject. The BBC article is a good start, but can you find at least a few more? I've also tagged your article as needing more
123:
Thanks for your review
Matthew! I just uploaded some images. I have been looking for a way to move the page into article space, but haven't been able to find a way. Do you mind helping me? Thanks! Edgar
232:
This is a new article about a movie called La casa muda. This is my first article. I judged this movie to be notable because it is one of the only feature films to be shot in a single camera take.
803:
pipes – America’s professional tradesmen are the backbone of our nation." This is not stating basic facts, this is working to convince the reader of a given perspective. I'd suggest you read
939:
Format-wise it looks great. I've fixed the category link at the bottom. I don't know enough about computer science to review the content, but if you have no luck here you could try asking at
283:
Hello there, and thank you. I was hoping someone could please give me some feedback to make sure my page meets the wikipedia high standards for professional layout. Thank you again.
142:
need to resize your pics. Code them like so: ]. Substituting, of course, left/right as your choice, the pixel size before the "px" (250px is pretty popular), and then the caption.
667:
we're vulnerable to when using all-English sources. Ideally, you want to use at least a few
English sources, but it's fine to further develop with Arabic or any other language.
166:
to introduce yourself and your article. Just don't forget to sign each post, either by hitting the "sign" button at the top of your editing screen, or by typing four tildes.
808:
519:
I am just wondering if anyone can offer specific help on how I can improve this article. I would like to add more sections, but am unsure what else to write about. Thanks
365:
249:
Looks really good, except for the fact it's missing catgories. Note that Knowledge "Notability" is not the same thing as literal "notability", it's a policy guideline:
614:
in their formatting. Even larger than that issue though is that you have not documented Notability; that is, proof that the wider world cares about this band. Read
46:
32:
922:
I wrote an article about y-fast tries, a data structure for bounded universes that improves on x-fast tries. Any and all constructive feedback is appreciated.
586:
Hi, I'm looking for some help to verify this article and ensure it gets pushed to the main site. This is my first Wiki post. Thanks Exceptional Records UK
940:
712:
Hi, i'm requesting some help on finishing this article about the browser based soccer management game, similar to Hattrick which already has an entry here
373:
to other pages (not common nouns or locations, but technical terms or concepts, or lesser-known locations and people). You're also missing categories, see
888:
68:
210:
and see if there is any good subcategory for "Events held in Sydney" or similar. Probably in the "Culture" or "Society" sub-category if there is one.
807:
for an overview of how neutrality is employed on WP. The other issue to deal with is that your only Reference is to a site promoting the event; per
732:
I seem to be the main guy holding down the fort today, and I'm not really a sports guy. You may want to double-tap over on the Discussion pages of
965:
Dear user MatthewVanitas - thank you for your wonderful suggestion with my reference URLS and categories. I have completed these suggestions.
781:
756:
640:
646:
New article - please review. Please do bear in mind the difficulty of finding references which are in English and not in Arabic. Many thanks.
513:
300:
In a rush, but quick note: in your footnotes (which are good overall), you can tidy them up by tucking the link into the title, using
163:
105:
494:. Check my tags, make those fixes, check back in here at this same section (even if it's days later) and you'll be ready to publish.
509:
Thanks for your review Matthew. I have made the changes requested, please let me know if I have done them correctly. Thank You.
948:
804:
59:
17:
580:
733:
593:
537:
314:
if you're unsure how categorisation works, ensure the categories you add are functioning (shown as blue links), and use the
737:
615:
401:
407:
This is my first post - please check for formatting and content mistakes and also any rookie errors I might have made!
454:
250:
855:
for how to fix that. Other than that, looking decent overall. A bit more clarity on timeline, and a few additional
944:
916:
226:
182:
706:
1005:
906:
864:
816:
789:
745:
696:
672:
629:
589:
555:
499:
486:
on how/why to do this. Note also that you're working too hard to link to other WP article; rather than a full
443:
390:
327:
266:
215:
171:
147:
113:
722:
664:
663:
It's totally fine to use Arabic references; to some degree, it can actually be a positive in countering the
89:
1009:
986:
952:
933:
910:
882:
868:
820:
793:
774:
749:
726:
700:
676:
657:
633:
597:
574:
570:
559:
530:
526:
503:
471:
447:
435:
431:
419:
394:
358:
331:
294:
270:
243:
219:
200:
175:
151:
117:
93:
692:
683:
196:
85:
82:
This is my first article, could use any feedback, especially from architect or art history-contributors
770:
766:
374:
311:
925:
649:
463:
411:
1001:
929:
902:
860:
852:
812:
785:
741:
668:
653:
625:
551:
495:
483:
467:
439:
427:
415:
386:
370:
323:
262:
211:
167:
143:
109:
350:
844:
718:
338:
258:
239:
978:
286:
566:
522:
354:
536:
You've done really nice work, but I'm not a topic expert, and I see you've already contacted
104:
for instructions? For advice on the technical side, you can drop into the Discussion page of
878:
101:
460:
This is my first article, please check for any newbie errors I might have made. Thank You.
982:
290:
207:
714:]. I hope someone can help me get this entry together, thanks for your help, and time.
344:
I am a new editor tyring my best, I hope my article medaid4kids is fine, please advise.
192:
235:
318:. So not "Hospitals", "Australia", but "Pediatric hospitals in Sydney" or whatever
959:
277:
763:
please let me know what I can do in order to comply to the Knowledge standards.
482:
of the article to verify that the statement is based in a reputable source. See
874:
851:..."; you want them to be spelled-out citations. Check the LR guideline, and/or
780:
Note the page has been "userified", moved to a drafting space on your Userpage:
689:
Looking for assistance for a review of this new article. Thank you in advance.
206:
Looks really well-formatted overall; the one thing I'd suggest is to check out
77:
User:EdgarPriestly/Church of the Assumption of Mary, Riola di Vergato, Italy
188:
This is a new article moved to mainspace and request some feedback. Thanks
1000:
section/sub-section titles; they automatically format to the right size.
304:
brackets like so: . Monkey News, 14 April 2011]. This will display as "
157:
Ok, pics resized I believe. Thanks! Is this now visible in Knowledge?
836:
829:
491:
490:... link, just type double-brackets to link to a WP article: ] --: -->
898:
This is my first article and any feedback would be much appreciated!
540:, which is a good call. Since you've done those, all you really
257:
low-res cover, poster, or title shot to represent the film per
305:
835:
It would be cool if somebody reviewed my new article about
972:
Thank you again for your assistance. I appreciate it.
740:, where folks have more familiarity with the subject.
859:categories could help, as would a birthdate/year.
809:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies)
366:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies)
848:
843:I tagged the top: the main issue you have is
487:
8:
941:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computer_science
322:categories are most specific to your page.
889:User:MrMarkBGregory/The_Other_Guys_(group)
581:User:Exceptionalrecordsuk/Dekata Project
782:User:Abaker1067/National Tradesmen Day
757:User:Abaker1067/National Tradesmen Day
641:Gaza Community Mental Health Programme
379:the most specific categories possible
7:
514:Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2009
24:
316:most specific categories possible
996:the punctuation, and also don't
604:
129:
805:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
565:Thanks so much for the advice!
18:Knowledge:Requests for feedback
1:
26:
402:Living Costs and Food Survey
707:User:Iagaddict4400/Itsagoal
455:User:Gaurang85/Green Bridge
307:New Queensland Bannanas Out
164:WP:WikiProject Architecture
106:WP:WikiProject Architecture
1026:
1010:06:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
987:05:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
953:17:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
934:20:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
917:User:Rf_insane/Y-fast_trie
911:20:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
883:19:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
869:20:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
821:19:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
794:19:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
775:19:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
750:19:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
727:19:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
701:18:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
677:16:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
658:16:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
634:15:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
598:14:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
575:23:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
560:19:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
531:13:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
504:17:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
472:13:25, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
448:19:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
420:10:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
395:17:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
377:for how to select and add
359:09:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
332:15:37, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
295:07:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
271:16:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
244:05:48, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
227:User:Jwschind/La_casa_muda
220:18:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
201:05:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
183:ANZAC Field of Remembrance
176:03:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
152:03:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
118:04:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
94:00:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
60:Back to main feedback page
992:Two things: footnotes go
847:. Your links are all "
734:WP:WikiProject Football
619:same for blogs (unless
538:WP:WikiProject Cannabis
436:Category:Price indices
432:Category:Index numbers
945:Physics is all gnomes
738:WP:WikiProject Sports
616:WP:Notability (music)
590:Exceptionalrecordsuk
251:WP:Notability (film)
684:JeffreyM Consulting
69:Index of all pages
480:specific passages
72:
63:
54:
53:
1017:
665:WP:Systemic bias
612:
608:
607:
137:
133:
132:
66:
57:
50:
35:
27:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1014:
963:
920:
892:
857:highly specific
833:
760:
710:
687:
644:
605:
603:
584:
517:
458:
405:
364:Greetings, per
342:
281:
230:
208:Category:Sydney
186:
130:
128:
80:
73:
64:
55:
45:
42:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1023:
1021:
1013:
1012:
1002:MatthewVanitas
975:Best regards.
962:
957:
956:
955:
919:
914:
903:MrMarkBGregory
901:
891:
886:
872:
871:
861:MatthewVanitas
832:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
813:MatthewVanitas
797:
796:
786:MatthewVanitas
759:
754:
753:
752:
742:MatthewVanitas
717:
709:
704:
693:Michelle ruane
686:
681:
680:
679:
669:MatthewVanitas
643:
638:
637:
636:
626:MatthewVanitas
583:
578:
563:
562:
552:MatthewVanitas
516:
511:
507:
506:
496:MatthewVanitas
457:
452:
451:
450:
440:MatthewVanitas
410:
404:
399:
398:
397:
387:MatthewVanitas
347:
341:
336:
335:
334:
324:MatthewVanitas
280:
275:
274:
273:
263:MatthewVanitas
229:
224:
223:
222:
212:MatthewVanitas
191:
185:
180:
179:
178:
168:MatthewVanitas
155:
154:
144:MatthewVanitas
121:
120:
110:MatthewVanitas
79:
74:
65:
56:
52:
51:
43:
38:
36:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1022:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
973:
970:
966:
961:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
937:
936:
935:
931:
927:
923:
918:
915:
913:
912:
908:
904:
899:
896:
890:
887:
885:
884:
880:
876:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
840:
838:
831:
828:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
801:
800:
799:
798:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
776:
772:
768:
764:
758:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
719:Iagaddict4400
715:
713:
708:
705:
703:
702:
698:
694:
690:
685:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
647:
642:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
617:
611:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
587:
582:
579:
577:
576:
572:
568:
561:
557:
553:
548:
543:
539:
535:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
515:
512:
510:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
476:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
461:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
408:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:WP:Categories
372:
367:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:WP:Categories
309:
308:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
189:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
160:
159:
158:
153:
149:
145:
141:
136:
127:
126:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
97:
96:
95:
91:
87:
86:EdgarPriestly
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
62:
61:
48:
47:2011 April 16
44:
41:
40:2011 April 15
37:
34:
33:2011 April 14
29:
28:
19:
997:
993:
977:
974:
971:
967:
964:
960:Ochre Health
924:
921:
900:
897:
893:
873:
856:
853:WP:Footnotes
834:
765:
761:
736:(soccer) or
716:
711:
691:
688:
648:
645:
620:
609:
588:
585:
567:Julietabulie
564:
546:
541:
523:Julietabulie
521:
518:
508:
484:WP:Footnotes
479:
462:
459:
428:WP:Footnotes
409:
406:
382:
378:
371:WP:wikilinks
349:
346:
343:
319:
315:
306:
301:
285:
282:
278:Ochre Health
254:
234:
231:
190:
187:
156:
139:
134:
122:
84:
81:
67:
58:
39:
845:WP:Link rot
339:medaid4kids
259:WP:Fair use
849:http://www
839:. Thanks.
767:Abaker1067
488:http://www
926:Rf insane
650:Clausvonb
621:officical
464:Gaurang85
412:Becca0706
193:MangoTime
102:WP:Images
610:Not done
320:existing
236:Jwschind
138:But you
837:Laura X
830:Laura X
492:Germany
351:Tommyxx
875:Dante8
385:have.
302:single
140:really
994:after
979:OH001
547:could
287:OH001
49:: -->
31:<
16:<
1006:talk
998:bold
983:talk
949:talk
930:talk
907:talk
879:talk
865:talk
817:talk
790:talk
771:talk
746:talk
723:talk
697:talk
673:talk
654:talk
630:talk
594:talk
571:talk
556:talk
527:talk
500:talk
468:talk
444:talk
416:talk
391:talk
383:they
355:talk
328:talk
291:talk
267:talk
240:talk
216:talk
197:talk
172:talk
148:talk
135:Done
114:talk
90:talk
542:can
434:or
255:one
1008:)
985:)
951:)
943:--
932:)
909:)
881:)
867:)
819:)
792:)
784:.
773:)
748:)
725:)
699:)
675:)
656:)
632:)
596:)
573:)
558:)
529:)
502:)
470:)
446:)
418:)
393:)
357:)
330:)
293:)
269:)
242:)
218:)
199:)
174:)
150:)
116:)
108:.
92:)
1004:(
981:(
947:(
928:(
905:(
877:(
863:(
815:(
788:(
769:(
744:(
721:(
695:(
671:(
652:(
628:(
592:(
569:(
554:(
525:(
498:(
466:(
442:(
414:(
389:(
353:(
326:(
289:(
265:(
238:(
214:(
195:(
170:(
146:(
112:(
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.