Knowledge

:Requests for feedback/2011 April 14 - Knowledge

Source 📝

759:...", but they should be proper citations with the title linked. Check out any other well-established WP article (hit the Edit button to see the coding) to see how to type that in. It will make the footnotes look a lot more polished. Again, if HMV people continue to come into the article and try and wholesale insert corporate announcements, minutiae about how many points it takes to get a photo signed by Justin Bieber, etc. it could get the article locked or deleted as a nuisance. If there are legitimate concerns about the article, or things that should really be added, use the Discussion page to bring them up, and if necessary ask for a neutral editor to come help at any of WP's many help pages. 730:
re-adding that promotional content after a chop, Speedy Deletion is likely. Don't look at this as "a compromise to get published now, and I'll add it back later" so much as "direct route to neutrality". I would highly recommend that, following a chop and publish, that HMV personnel refrain from editing the page, instead posting to Talk if there are things you think are honestly encylcopedically noteworthy and worth adding (a major article in the Vancouver Sun about the business angle), or to post to an alert board if you feel the article is being vandalised or adding unreferenced material.
850:. Also, footnotes go immediately following the punctuation (period, comma) of the sentence/phrase, no space between, no space between footnotes, and one space between the end of the footnote and the start of the new sentence. Don't abbreviate US state names, many of our readers aren't American don't know what "HI" means; editors from India are equally bad about using "UP" for Uttar Pradesh, etc., which confuses even me. Lastly, and very importantly, your categories are showing up in red because they're non-existent categories; you need to add categories that actually exist. Go to the big 524:. If the front-page of the WGA doesn't explicitly say "we gave Wong an award", you shouldn't have a footnote there at the end of the sentence "in 1998, the WGA gave Wong an award." Minor thing: people are usually referred to by just last name once their full name is first used, so thereafter simply "Wong" unless there happens to be another Wong in the sentence who needs to be told apart. You also need to add a few more categories, but 297: 215: 729:
Suggestion: I can wade into the article and "chop", that is, just hack out anything that's remotely gray-area CoI/advert. That will remove a lot of stuff, but it stands a good chance of bringing the article up to code. If you want that, let me know, but be aware that if the article drifts back into
550:
My first attempt to contribute to Knowledge. Article on retired (still living) Vice Admiral Lambert Jackson "Woody" Woodburne who is a former Chief of the South African Navy and one of the most decorated members of the SA Defence Force. My father served with him on SAS Emily Hobhouse 1972-74. I look
82:
I do not know if I posted this question in the correct forum. It would be greatly appreciated if someone has the time for an editor review, mostly for read-ability and content and not so much style. The indication is that it reads too much like an advertisement and I would like to work on that when
854:
and start following the rabbit-hole down to get an idea for which sub-sub-sub categories to add. There are probably categories like "Musical groups from Hawaii", "Folk-rock musical groups" etc., but you just have to look and see what's out there. After that, you'll be ready to publish; good work on
393:
references from established books/media/news discussing the person's achievements. You have one good one from an Aussie newspaper, so please find a few more links like it to help build your case. Will check back in in about 12hrs or so, so please read the Footnote guidelines and see if that helps.
845:
Sourcing meets par; a few minor format tweaks and you'll be good to go. You need to capitalise "Partridge Family" since that's actually the name of a band; unless the quote itself is wrong, in which case a "" at the end to say "I know the original writer messed it up" would help. You also need to
579:
carefully read the upload form when uploading photos; easily 80% of first-timers mess up the sourcing and copyright information, get their images automatically deleted, and then either give up in frustration or do it over multiple times until they figure out how to fill out the form. It's spelled
113:
What you want to do instead is take a look at that long list of books/articles used to write the WP article, and footnote individual sentences of the WP article to the source which proves that statement. Footnotes on WP aren't for "by the way, here's an interesting point", they're academic-style
434:
On WP, "sources" and "references" are basically the same thing in terms of footnotes. Some people use "sources" to mean "books/articles I used holisitically, but that I'm not using to prove individual sentnces" and "references" to mean "I'm footnoting this book/article because it evidences the
1056:
I made some initial formatting fixes; hit the article's "History" tab and use the "difference" buttons to see what changed from your draft to mine. Please continue to make the changes I did (unbracketing links, bulleting lists with an asterisk, etc). Note also you need to add categories
707:? It would be most helpful if you could post on the Talk page of said article to indicate your affiliation with the company, awareness of COI policy, and assertion that you're working to keep the article neutral, understand that HMV does not "own" the page, and that you will not contest 568:
I added a few "tags" at the top to suggest improvements, but the main thing that would really help is if you apply footnotes to indicate which references prove/verify which statements made in the article: "John Smith graduated from university in 1948 with a BA in anthropology.<ref:
520:...") and needs to be turned into actual citations with clickable links; take a glance at any long-established article to see the usual format. Also a few of your footnotes appear to be just general-interest links, like "World Glaucoma Association"; footnotes should be 678:
Hi, I'm currently an intern at HMV Canada and was asked to recreate this article because of a lack of reliable, significant sources, as well as being too promotional, I think that it is ready for another edit, please let me know what else I can change/ add! Thanks :)
461:
to see how footnotes can be automatically programmed into your article? The problem right now is that you have a bunch of text, and then a list of books/articles, but no clear link between them since you don't say which facts are derived from which sources.
966:
Setting aside content for now, you have a few major format issues. 1) do not use "Ibid" in footnotes. If somebody inserts a footnote between #3 and #4, now all of a sudden your #5 is "Ibiding" to #4 rather than the #3 it was supposed to. Instead employ
750:
That would be great! My whole problem to begin with was not really understanding that from the start, if you could chop at it to put it online that would be fantastic, and if any additions are needed in the future we'll just post to Talk. Thanks again!
107:
footnotes. That is, your footnotes just explain where the pictures come from, which is unnecessary because when you click the image there's a whole display of all the picture data (sources, etc), and anything additional to that you can just put in the
416:
I need some input on the references - I am not sure that I got it right. I have listed the sources used to create the article, but these are not "references" in the true sense of the word. How does one list "sources" as apposed to "references"?
388:
and see if that helps you understand the concept and coding for them. If not, post back here as to what troubles you're having, and I'll help you tomorrow (US East Coast). In the meantime, the main thing any biography article needs is
630:
This organization (Eisenhower Fellowships) has been around for 58 years and many of the alumni Fellows mention this organization in their Knowledge entries and I feel like there needs to be a main page to link their entries to.
1095:
Created a page for the word 'Anogen', which is a trade name of a company named yes biotech labs. This is my first new page. Please take a look, and see if anything need to be changed. Thank you in advance for your reviews.
802:: at first glance, your first sentence is confusing: "is the mechanism or process that makes a city intelligent or smart". Since at that point you have not yet defined these technical terms, it's not clear that you mean 268:
I've removed the tags, you're good to publish. You can select the "Move" button (in the drop-down menu to the right of the star icon at the top of the screen) to move it. Let me know if you have any trouble with it.
901:
than The Blade's own site. Can you find mention of it on GoogleBooks, or in online news articles? Extract some more facts from those and add them with evidentiary footnotes. Also, your footnotes are "bare URLs"
1010:
The big Edit tab at the very top (next to History) opens Editing for the entire page; the little (edit) buttons next to sub-sections are if you just want to edit that one area and don't want to scroll down a lot.
497:
This person is a doctor, scientist, inventor, author and fashion socialite. About to be founder and co-head of a centre for engineering surgical products, and Assoc. Professor. Is this sufficiently notable?
979:. So not "Singapore", "Medicine", but "Medical researchers in Singapore". Only the broadest articles should fall immediately under the broadest cats. I'll leave someone else to cover the content review. 711:/footnoted criticism/negativity, but will instead request an uninvolved editor review such content if you feel the negative addition is properly sourced yet is not being presented accurately or neutrally. 544: 910:'s footnotes for examples of proper spelled-out citations. This is vital, since you want to be able to find the article/book by name/publisher/date even if the website moves or becomes defunct. 654:
Hi! I would appreciate feedback for my new article. It was poorly written so I rewrote the entire article and provided valid references. I also would like to see if it is ready to go live.
379:
Greetings, I've got to get to bed, but I've made some minor format upgrades, added maintenance tags (they're not criticism, they're for your reference as to things to work on), etc.
487:)Thanks! - It now makes more sense - I will try adding the references correctly over the weekend, and perhaps list sources I used for the article as a whole under "Bibliography". 846:
unify your duplicate footnotes so that instead of the OC article being #1, #3, #7 it's "#1a,b,c". Fortunately, there's an easy automatic way to do this, just read the short
806:
and not just the dictionary definition "smart, clever". Recommend you kind of squish part of sentence two into sentence one to make the technical concepts a little clearer.
755:
Chopped and published. One thing you can do to neaten it up and save me time, and which would not involve COI, is to fix the "link rot". The footnotes are mostly just "
516:
Few quick things: you should have "sections" (2 equals signs) before making sub-sections (3 equals signs). Your sourcing looks decent at a glance, but it's bare URLs ("
46: 32: 703:
careful to be neutral, and business articles are held to a very high neutrality standard to avoid WP becoming a "advertise yourself here" site. Have you read
580:
out in the guideline, but it's not terribly intuitive. Looking forward to seeing the photos though. You may also want to check in at the discussion page of
250:
As regards the photo, I am trying to acquire a good photograph of his; I should get it in a couple of days. I will upload once the article gets published.
68: 994:
Thanks- though now I don't see how to edit the top two paragraphs. Can you tell me how you changed it, and how I can edit those top two paragraphs? --
358:
I am happy with the content of the article 'Louise Bawden' but am struggling with references and external links. Could I please obtain some feedback.
76: 946:
Would greatly appreciate any feedback on the work-in-progress page. Is there any reason I should not move it into the main space just yet? Thanks!
624: 581: 247:
I have now made correction suggested by you. As you said, the article looks more tidy now! Thanks once again for your meticulous suggestions.
672: 699:
Greetings, thanks for being up-front about your affiliation. It is not flat prohibited for affiliated people to write, but they have to be
606:
Have rewritten page in an effort remove advertisement notice. Request an administrator to review and hopefully remove the tag. Thank you.
491: 410: 822: 940: 59: 17: 775: 704: 999: 956: 600: 648: 349: 103:
Greetings, I've added the "no footnotes" tag, as though you do literally have footnotes, they're not actually serving
1027: 689: 558: 1078: 1016: 995: 984: 952: 915: 860: 811: 764: 735: 716: 589: 533: 467: 440: 399: 309: 274: 227: 189: 162: 123: 851: 835: 662: 571:". Have you tried checking on GoogleBooks for any good materials you can use as evidence? Note you can use 528:, not huge ones like "Singapore", but precise like "Singaporean medical researchers", etc. Hope this helps. 828:
Ok, I think I have made all of the necessary fixes. Let me know if this is ready to make public... thanks!
1108: 1104: 1082: 1050: 1020: 1003: 988: 960: 934: 919: 891: 864: 839: 815: 793: 768: 739: 720: 693: 685: 666: 642: 618: 593: 562: 537: 510: 471: 444: 428: 403: 373: 343: 326: 313: 278: 262: 231: 206: 180: 166: 151: 127: 97: 339: 831: 789: 484: 424: 1100: 785: 1058: 972: 871: 638: 634: 554: 506: 202: 176: 147: 335: 89: 1074: 1066: 1012: 980: 911: 856: 807: 760: 731: 712: 614: 585: 529: 463: 458: 436: 395: 385: 365: 305: 270: 223: 158: 119: 115: 93: 320: 288: 254: 658: 369: 1042: 332:
This is my first submission to Knowledge and I would like to have some feedback on it. Thanks!
968: 930: 887: 847: 258: 238: 1089: 575:
to automatically generate full citations from GoogleBooks links. Regarding photos: please
480: 420: 1046: 502: 198: 172: 143: 457:
like footnotes, but they're not actually footnoted to anything. Maybe take a glance at
610: 926: 907: 883: 522:
specifically providing evidence of the statement you put the footnote at the end of
570:
Ed Adams. ''Life of John Smith''. Acme Press, 1973. ISBN 123-456-7890</ref: -->
86:
Thanking you in advance for your assistance, however little or much that may be.
551:
forward to any comments and tips. Haven't uploaded photos as yet. Many thanks.
803: 1069:
for info on how to properly prep footnotes. Note also that footnotes fall
971:. 2) Your categories are showing up in red because they don't exist; see 584:
to let folks know about your draft article, solicit specialist feedback.
906:..."), but you want them spelled out as full citations. Take a look at 114:
footnotes for "here is where the above statement comes from". See
134: 975:
on how to add working categories, and note categories should be
877:
A article about the building in Reading. Please give feedback.
572: 1073:
the punctuation marks of a sentence/phrase (looks tidier).
897:
Check the tags I added; you want to add footnotes to sites
157:
Format-wise, the main thing you need is to add categories.
453:
Ah, I see what you did; you manually typed citations that
1065:...) and need to be spelled out as full citations. See 781:
Request "New Article" feedback and tag removal. Thanks.
545:
User:HoneybadgerWIKI/Lambert Jackson ("Woody") Woodburne
435:
specific sentence I'm footnoting with this footnote."
384:So far as footnoting: please try briefly reading 287:Cannot find it! Any other way to move? Thanx! 1062: 903: 855:meeting Notability through right footnoting. 756: 517: 8: 1061:), and that your footnotes are "bare URLs" ( 195:Request "New Article" tag removal. Thanks! 140:Request "New Article" tag removal. Thanks. 941:User:Jennifer.Marie.Hoff/Contraband (dance) 77:Artcraft Fluorescent Lighting Corporation 625:User:Hollylogan/Eisenhower Fellowships 83:editing the parts the need attention. 673:User:Adriandandrea25/Purehmv_(Canada) 7: 492:User:John Frost/Tina Tzee Ling Wong 411:Van Der Merwe Miszewski Architects 24: 823:User:Alexanderheld/Speed_The_Band 295: 213: 582:WP:WikiProject Military History 18:Knowledge:Requests for feedback 776:Spatial intelligence of cities 601:Pervasive DataRush Technology 171:Done. I was lazy... Thanks! -- 1: 26: 649:User:Ashleyjonesme/Auslogics 350:User:Clbawden/Louise_Bawden 1124: 1109:00:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1083:20:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1051:20:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1021:23:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1004:22:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 989:20:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 961:19:57, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 935:19:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 920:19:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 892:18:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 865:19:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 840:17:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 816:17:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 794:16:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 769:02:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 740:17:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 721:16:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 694:16:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 667:15:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 643:15:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 619:13:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 594:14:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 563:11:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 538:13:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 511:10:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 472:13:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 445:13:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 429:08:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 404:05:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 374:04:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 344:01:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 314:02:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 279:02:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 263:01:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 232:01:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 207:01:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 181:01:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 167:00:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 152:00:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 128:00:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 98:00:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 60:Back to main feedback page 1006:User:Jennifer.Marie.Hoff 573:http://reftag.appspot.com 1028:User:Vleit/Jürgen Ehlers 190:Sentence spacing studies 852:Category:Musical groups 705:WP:Conflict of interest 327:Melanie Smith (artist) 118:for the whole policy. 1033:Please help Reflist? 977:specific as possible 872:The Blade (building) 526:specific as possible 996:Jennifer.Marie.Hoff 953:Jennifer.Marie.Hoff 69:Index of all pages 239:K S Narayanaswamy 72: 63: 54: 53: 1115: 303: 299: 298: 221: 217: 216: 66: 57: 50: 35: 27: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1093: 1031: 944: 875: 826: 779: 686:Adriandandrea25 676: 652: 628: 604: 555:HoneybadgerWIKI 548: 495: 414: 353: 330: 296: 294: 242: 214: 212: 193: 138: 80: 73: 64: 55: 45: 42: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1121: 1119: 1099: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1075:MatthewVanitas 1030: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1013:MatthewVanitas 992: 991: 981:MatthewVanitas 949: 943: 938: 923: 922: 912:MatthewVanitas 880: 874: 869: 868: 867: 857:MatthewVanitas 825: 820: 819: 818: 808:MatthewVanitas 784: 778: 773: 772: 771: 761:MatthewVanitas 747: 745: 744: 743: 742: 732:MatthewVanitas 724: 723: 713:MatthewVanitas 682: 675: 670: 657: 651: 646: 627: 622: 609: 603: 598: 597: 596: 586:MatthewVanitas 547: 542: 541: 540: 530:MatthewVanitas 501: 494: 489: 479: 477: 476: 475: 474: 464:MatthewVanitas 448: 447: 437:MatthewVanitas 413: 408: 407: 406: 396:MatthewVanitas 381: 380: 364: 352: 347: 329: 324: 317: 316: 306:MatthewVanitas 282: 281: 271:MatthewVanitas 253: 241: 236: 235: 234: 224:MatthewVanitas 192: 187: 186: 185: 184: 183: 159:MatthewVanitas 137: 132: 131: 130: 120:MatthewVanitas 110: 109: 79: 74: 65: 56: 52: 51: 43: 38: 36: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1120: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059:WP:Categories 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1005: 1001: 997: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 973:WP:Categories 970: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 950: 947: 942: 939: 937: 936: 932: 928: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 900: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 881: 878: 873: 870: 866: 862: 858: 853: 849: 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 832:Alexanderheld 829: 824: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 798: 797: 796: 795: 791: 787: 782: 777: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 753: 752: 748: 741: 737: 733: 728: 727: 726: 725: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 680: 674: 671: 669: 668: 664: 660: 659:Ashleyjonesme 655: 650: 647: 645: 644: 640: 636: 632: 626: 623: 621: 620: 616: 612: 607: 602: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 578: 574: 567: 566: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 546: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 512: 508: 504: 499: 493: 490: 488: 486: 482: 473: 469: 465: 460: 456: 452: 451: 450: 449: 446: 442: 438: 433: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 418: 412: 409: 405: 401: 397: 392: 387: 383: 382: 378: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 362: 359: 356: 351: 348: 346: 345: 341: 337: 333: 328: 325: 323: 322: 315: 311: 307: 302: 293: 292: 291: 290: 285: 280: 276: 272: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 256: 251: 248: 245: 240: 237: 233: 229: 225: 220: 211: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 191: 188: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 111: 106: 102: 101: 100: 99: 95: 91: 87: 84: 78: 75: 71: 70: 62: 61: 48: 47:2011 April 15 44: 41: 40:2011 April 14 37: 34: 33:2011 April 13 29: 28: 19: 1101:Marqueezhang 1098: 1094: 1070: 1067:WP:Footnotes 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 993: 976: 951: 948: 945: 924: 908:Willis Tower 898: 882: 879: 876: 830: 827: 799: 783: 780: 749: 746: 708: 700: 684: 681: 677: 656: 653: 633: 629: 608: 605: 576: 553: 549: 525: 521: 500: 496: 478: 459:WP:Footnotes 454: 419: 415: 390: 386:WP:Footnotes 363: 360: 357: 354: 334: 331: 318: 300: 286: 283: 252: 249: 246: 243: 218: 197: 194: 142: 139: 116:WP:Footnotes 104: 88: 85: 81: 67: 58: 39: 786:Blackrock01 481:MichelleCla 421:MichelleCla 1063:http://www 969:WP:REFNAME 925:Thanks! -- 904:http://www 848:WP:REFNAME 804:smart city 757:http://www 635:Hollylogan 518:http://www 503:John Frost 284:Dear Sir, 244:Dear Sir, 199:Airborne84 173:Airborne84 144:Airborne84 701:extremely 611:Glennmad1 336:Edwinculp 90:Boggle987 1036:Thanks! 366:Clbawden 108:caption. 927:Water14 884:Water14 800:Comment 709:sourced 391:several 361:Thanks 321:Goks277 319:Thanx! 289:Goks277 255:Goks277 1090:Anogen 1071:after 1043:Vleit 899:other 135:Usage 49:: --> 31:< 16:< 1105:talk 1079:talk 1047:talk 1017:talk 1000:talk 985:talk 957:talk 931:talk 916:talk 888:talk 861:talk 836:talk 812:talk 790:talk 765:talk 736:talk 717:talk 690:talk 663:talk 639:talk 615:talk 590:talk 577:very 559:talk 534:talk 507:talk 485:talk 468:talk 455:look 441:talk 425:talk 400:talk 370:talk 355:Hi, 340:talk 310:talk 301:Done 275:talk 259:talk 228:talk 219:Done 203:talk 177:talk 163:talk 148:talk 124:talk 94:talk 1039:Vl 569:--> 1107:) 1081:) 1049:) 1019:) 1002:) 987:) 959:) 933:) 918:) 902:(" 890:) 863:) 838:) 814:) 792:) 767:) 738:) 719:) 692:) 665:) 641:) 617:) 592:) 561:) 536:) 509:) 470:) 443:) 427:) 402:) 372:) 342:) 312:) 304:. 277:) 261:) 230:) 222:. 205:) 179:) 165:) 150:) 126:) 105:as 96:) 1103:( 1077:( 1057:( 1045:( 1015:( 998:( 983:( 955:( 929:( 914:( 886:( 859:( 834:( 810:( 788:( 763:( 734:( 715:( 688:( 661:( 637:( 613:( 588:( 557:( 532:( 505:( 483:( 466:( 439:( 423:( 398:( 368:( 338:( 308:( 273:( 257:( 226:( 201:( 175:( 161:( 146:( 122:( 92:(

Index

Knowledge:Requests for feedback
2011 April 13
2011 April 15
Back to main feedback page
Index of all pages
Artcraft Fluorescent Lighting Corporation
Boggle987
talk
00:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
WP:Footnotes
MatthewVanitas
talk
00:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Usage
Airborne84
talk
00:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
MatthewVanitas
talk
00:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Airborne84
talk
01:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Sentence spacing studies
Airborne84
talk
01:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
MatthewVanitas
talk
01:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.