371:
several instances, I was the sole defender, or one of very few defenders, of the Satmar position, and the
Neturei Karta position. My qualms with Daniel and with Shaul Avrom (Shuli) were with their pushing of a narrow POV, to the exclusion of everything else. In numerous places throughout the talk-page in question, I stated emphatically that my opinion (and theirs) was irrelevant, and that only verifiability and NPOV was relevant. They responded by asserting that (despite the lack of evidence) their position was True (with Big-T). I took exception with that position because it is against Knowledge (XXG)'s policy. I ask Shuli to point out a single instance where I attacked him. I assure the one or two people reading this fun little page that he will not be able to do so. I'll further comment that I have shown what I believe to be incredible restraint given that Daniel575 on a few occasions said I should perish for me deeds and that I'm "worse than ." Rather than attack me without cause, perhaps Shuli should give credit where it is due.
309:'Jews' being subject to the death penalty. (Even though this is a merely theoretical thing, since the Jewish death penalty has not existed for about 2000 years, people mistook me for calling for actual violence against them here.) I regret that comment and the entire situation and would not repeat that mistake. My comment was not intended to incite to violence and I regret the fact that it caused such a severe misunderstanding. I apologize for that, and point to the fact that with all of my subsequent accounts - 5 by now - I have only made normal, regular, positive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) - and I also refer to the fact that each time, it was Yossiea who 'found' me and came pressing for me to be blocked again.
367:
said regarding that issue. Daniel has made what he imagines is a good case for reinstatement. Of course, he should know that he can be reinstated after a year of his original ban if the admins deem it appropriate. He also should know that the fact that he has now made four or five sockpuppets demonstrates that he has no desire to follow
Knowledge (XXG) policy, though he does seem intent on "improving" Knowledge (XXG) according to his definition of the word. This lack of regard for policy should be taken into consideration when the time comes. That time is not now. He is still within the year, and should be banned in accordance Knowledge (XXG) policy. Otherwise, why have rules?
322:
reason to. He is a sockpuppet, he admitted as such and anything short of banning him will just show that his bullying tactics is a way to get around Wiki policies. In addition, the person who called this a witch hunt is a rogue administrator, secondly, I don't identify myself with Kach. Thirdly, over the past couple of weeks I have made over a hundred edits reverting vandalism, so his claim that all I'm here for is to witch-hunt him is laughable, but again, regardless of claims or defenses, he admitted to being a banned user. That is against the rules.
208:, for example), reverted vandalism, participated in some useful discussions, and have only had a positive role on Knowledge (XXG). A careful look at my contributions will show this. I also refer to my user page. I am here to have a positive role on Knowledge (XXG). I do not care about 'blocks'. I will remain on Knowledge (XXG), not to disturb it but to improve it. And nobody will prevent me from removing incorrect information from Knowledge (XXG).
219:
with the silent approval of multiple unnamed administrators, who are aware of who I am, aware of the fact that my main username -Daniel575- has been blocked in the past. I intend to use this account to show that I am in no way disruptive to
Knowledge (XXG) and merely wish to have a positive influence here, making useful contributions. I maintain all guidelines of
419:
It is obvious that Bear and Dragon is the same as Daniel575. He claims as much and is proud of it. The worse part is that he is continuing in his previous editing practices: He does not seem concerned with improving the quality of the page, but rather that through brute force editing to force his
218:
None of my edits under this name, nor under my previous username, nor under the username before that and nor under the username before that, warranted even a warning, let alone a block. It is merely
Yossiea's witch-hunt which keeps me from getting blocked. I am currently - again - on Knowledge (XXG)
177:
is editting the same pages as user Daniel575. In addition, both live in
Jerusalem, both are orginally from Zutphen in the Netherlands and both speak the same languages. Furthermore, both use the same style in editting and getting their point across. Here is the link the Daniel575's userpage with the
370:
The main reason why I'm responding here is because "Shuli" has attacked me. I mention Daniel only because he is the subject of this page. I looked at the page that Shuli pointed to (Haredim and
Zionism). There is nothing there that I wrote that could even remotely qualify as an attack. In fact, on
366:
With respect to the sock-puppet claim, Daniel575 has admitted what anyone who was paying attention could have figured out: that he and "Bear_and_Dragon" ("Bear") are one and the same. That's a violation of
Knowledge (XXG) policy that immediately results in a permanant ban. Nothing else needs to be
321:
In other words, he admits that he is the same user, and that he obviously doesn't care about
Knowledge (XXG) policies. What is also disturbing is that he has confirmed that there are some administrators that also don't care about policies. I haven't read the rest of his manifesto because I see no
265:
Since there is no place where I can complain (after all, I cannot even contact the ArbCom), I will probably end up getting banned into eternity. However, this does not bother me in any way. I am not looking for fame, just for ways to improve
Knowledge (XXG). After writing the largest part of the
389:
Why is nothing being done about this? If you check out his userpage, he is openly mocking
Knowledge (XXG) policies. This CANNOT continue. Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a bully pulpit. His defenses are irrelevant, he is a sockpuppet, he admits to such and he needs to be
374:
If it helps, I think Daniel was pretty corrosive to Knowledge (XXG)'s atmosphere. And I frankly believe that it is beyond his ability to change that fact, even if he wanted to (which he clearly doesn't). I hope that Admins terminate this new incarnation
390:
banned. He will never learn his lesson. There is a reason why we're up to report #5. According to WikiPolicy: "The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended."
304:
The reason why I got blocked had nothing to do with the fight between me and Yossiea. I was blocked because I had written a very untactical and impolite comment - and had written and confirmed it multiple times - about
536:
Bear and Dragon has already been blocked for block evasion. In the future, if another SSP report is filed, please keep the report short. There is no need to get involved in long discussions with a sockpuppet.
448:
Regarding the original report, there is no such thing as a "one username policy". Individuals are allowed to have multiple accounts as long as they are not using them abusively. I'd say that per
298:(moreover, Hasidim are *by definition* Haredim, since Hasidism is a subgroup of Haredim, just like Georgians are a subgroup of Americans and just like Parisians are a subgroup of the French).
363:
I don't have anything to do with this conversation, and yet I've been dragged in by some editor with a taste for POV, and a bone to pick. I'm only responding because I have been attacked.
482:
He expressed an unpopular religious position that involved the death penalty. This case does not belong at RFCU. There's nothing to check. He's being open and obvious. --
295:
In this case, Yossiea intentionally inserted plainly incorrect information (which constitutes vandalism) merely because *I* had correct the previously incorrect verson:
506:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive151#Daniel575_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs_.C2.B7_logs_.C2.B7_block_user_.C2.B7_block_log.29
40:
289:
When I previously complained about this (at a point where, due to Yossiea, I was intending to forever abandon Knowledge (XXG) since I got sick of his stalking me):
215:
Knowledge (XXG) rather than launching witch-hunts against other users. Even other editors have used the term 'witch-hunt' to refer to Yossiea's behavior against me.
246:, a fanatical Zionist group. He intends to punish me for not being Zionist. Regarding this, I must mention that despite the fact that I myself am anti-Zionist, I
339:). Your bugging Doniel for personal attacks, and while that may be true, you and meshulam are doing the same thing to me and Doniel, so stop being hypocritical,
204:
I have not made a single edit anywhere which was in any way disruptive to Knowledge (XXG). I have done an awful lot of work (just check what I did yesterday on
462:
I believe that would be on Daniel's deleted talk page. He most certainly was banned, IIRC, he was threatening other users, and ElC put the indef block on him.
125:
182:
In addition, on B&D's userpage he states "I have previously edited on Knowledge (XXG)" that is an open admission of violating one-username policy.
223:, have not ever disturbed another user, and am monitoring several frequently vandalized pages to revert vandalism and maintain NPOV there (mainly
36:
77:
119:
17:
205:
131:
71:
273:
Next, I would like to refer to some highly insulting comments Yossiea made about me before my main account was blocked. See
230:
Yossiea's reason for hating me and launching continuous witch-hunts against me is my involvement with fiercely anti-Zionist
505:
262:- will readily confirm. Yossiea is launching a personal witch-hunt against me, merely because I am not a fanatical Zionist.
352:
Where did I attack anyone for not being a Zionist? Secondly, I don't need to Assume Good Faith with a sockpuppet account.
137:
473:
Why was Daniel banned originally? looking at the last argument he was getting into, he didn't seem so irrational... --
83:
113:
336:
267:
546:
517:
500:
496:
Where can I find the records of conversations relating to his ban records and, if need be, dispute the ban? --
491:
477:
468:
409:
396:
379:
358:
347:
328:
316:
196:
164:
39:. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
89:
456:, which would make this account an sockpuppet evading an indefinite block. Because of this I've blocked
466:
394:
356:
326:
194:
162:
449:
313:
174:
108:
542:
65:
463:
391:
353:
323:
191:
159:
277:
452:
own statements here, it is fairly obvious this is the same individual who previously edited as
306:
344:
340:
220:
406:
180:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Daniel575&direction=next&oldid=64251914
433:
538:
497:
474:
453:
60:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry.
376:
335:
Yossiea, both you and Meshulam attacked me and Daniel for not being zionists, (see
255:
302:
I request that this case be transferred to the ArbCom before I get blocked again.
190:
Daniel575 has been banned several times already, this is the 5th case submitted.
513:
487:
259:
254:
article from anti-Israel bias, as other users involved with that page - mainly
235:
35:
No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the
510:
484:
251:
239:
231:
224:
227:, in which I was also involved in the past under my main account).
243:
211:
I wish that other users, such as Yossiea, would also focus on
424:
For example he added this POV wording to a wikipage about
432:
Another example is insisting that in introducing his own
270:
article to remove tens of typos and small mistakes there.
437:
425:
296:
290:
284:
274:
179:
143:
95:
280:'. Basically he is calling me a psycho, there.
8:
250:maintain NPOV and continuously defend the
234:(ultra-Orthodox) Jewish groups such as
18:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets
7:
436:and POV in this article about the
343:and please stop your attacking. --
242:. Yossiea himself identifies with
24:
420:particular agenda is the pages.
206:List of hospitals in Netherlands
1:
312:That is all I have to say. --
564:
547:17:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
518:18:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
501:07:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
492:22:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
478:20:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
469:17:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
410:19:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
397:14:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
380:00:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
359:15:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
348:13:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
329:01:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
317:17:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
197:17:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
165:17:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
43:for detailed instructions.
438:re-established Sanhedrin
337:Talk:Haredim and Zionism
276:where he accuses me of '
268:Satmar (Hasidic dynasty)
32:Please do not modify it.
56:Suspected sockpuppeteer
283:I refer also to this:
178:relevant information:
37:talk page of this case
104:Suspected sockpuppets
402:Report submission by
266:above, I edited the
175:User:Bear and Dragon
155:Report submission by
444:Additional comments
426:Rabbi Yoel Schwartz
278:Jerusalem syndrome
450:Bear and Dragon's
341:Assume Good Faith
555:
458:
457:
147:
126:deleted contribs
99:
78:deleted contribs
34:
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
551:
314:Bear and Dragon
111:
109:Bear and Dragon
63:
53:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
561:
559:
550:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
446:
445:
441:
440:
429:
428:
417:
416:
404:
403:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
372:
368:
364:
361:
333:
332:
331:
310:
299:
293:
287:
281:
271:
263:
228:
216:
209:
188:
187:
172:
171:
157:
156:
151:
148:
106:
105:
100:
58:
57:
52:
50:User:Daniel575
47:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
549:
548:
544:
540:
531:
530:
519:
516:
515:
512:
507:
504:
503:
502:
499:
495:
494:
493:
490:
489:
486:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
471:
470:
467:
465:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
430:
427:
423:
422:
421:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
393:
381:
378:
373:
369:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
351:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
325:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
308:
303:
300:
297:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
275:
272:
269:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
222:
217:
214:
210:
207:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
193:
185:
184:
183:
181:
176:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
161:
154:
153:
152:
149:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
124:
121:
118:
115:
110:
103:
102:
101:
97:
94:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
62:
55:
54:
51:
48:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
535:
509:
483:
447:
418:
405:
388:
301:
256:User:Amoruso
247:
212:
189:
173:
158:
150:
140:
134:
128:
122:
116:
107:
92:
86:
80:
74:
68:
59:
31:
28:
539:--Akhilleus
532:Conclusions
260:User:Okedem
407:Historian2
375:quickly.--
138:block user
132:page moves
90:block user
84:page moves
498:Yodamace1
475:Yodamace1
454:Daniel575
307:Messianic
236:Dushinsky
213:improving
144:block log
96:block log
61:Daniel575
41:read this
415:Evidence
377:Meshulam
186:Comments
170:Evidence
120:contribs
72:contribs
464:Yossiea
392:Yossiea
354:Yossiea
324:Yossiea
192:Yossiea
160:Yossiea
252:Israel
240:Satmar
232:Haredi
225:Israel
221:WP:ATT
434:WP:OR
345:Shuli
16:<
543:talk
514:not?
488:not?
258:and
244:Kach
238:and
114:talk
66:talk
508:--
545:)
248:do
541:(
511:Y
485:Y
292:.
286:,
146:)
141:·
135:·
129:·
123:·
117:·
112:(
98:)
93:·
87:·
81:·
75:·
69:·
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.