896:- You raise a very interesting point ("... its proper use is more to find category pages than sites ..."). The conceptual framework of the ODP is similar to that of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in that "the basic classes are organized by disciplines or fields of study....not by subject" (DDC 21st ed., p. xxxii). Therefore, "there is likely to be no single place for a given subject" because any subject will "fall under several disciplines." The DDC 21 illustrates this by showing that the subject of "clothing" is classified in its various aspects under armed forces, arts, commercial manufacturing, customs, health, home economics, home sewing, product safety, psychology, and social welfare. "The guiding principle of the DDC is that a work is classed in the discipline for which it is intended," therefore different works on the same subject fall under completely different classes. Similarly, in the ODP different sites on the same subject can fall under completely different categories depending on the site's treatment of the subject and disciplinary focus.
1004:- I took a look at current DMOZ searches that don't use dmoz2. A DMOZ search results page lists up to 5 categories at the top of the page, showing the number of results in each category. There may be results in other categores, but only 5 are listed. The search results are listed below the category list. For each search, I identified how many of the 5 categories have the subject name in them (subj cats) and could be used in place of the search, and how many do not and probably should not be used in place of the search (non-subj cats). I show hits for each of these (hits), hits in the 5 cats, total hits for all dmoz, and hits in categories that aren't listed in the 5 categories (other hits). I also uncovered several instances of possible abuse (note 4).
3912:
things are mentioned, (backed up with sources) just like any information of speculative or uncertain nature in any article should. Also, as the box is now used, on the very top of the article (the most important place), it may give the casual reader the impression that the circumstances around this particular person's death are somewhat special, even if they in most cases aren't. The lead section should be a summary of the article, beginning with explaining who the person was and what he/she was known for. It is very rare that the most important thing about someone is the uncertain circumstances around his/her death. And even then this information should be incorporated in the lead as encyclopedic prose, not inside a big flashy box. --
3059:". One of the purposes of templates is to save time for editors, by transcluding commonly used text. Another purpose of templates is to provide information to readers. This template lets readers know that a person just died. When a notable person dies and that death is in the news, the Knowledge (XXG) article often undergoes big changes. The size and look and language of a template can be changed. If a reader finds this template intrusive, they're free to follow the link to this TFD from the template itself and say so.
4503:. These kind of mistakes indicate a very poor command of Kurdish language. Also there are no articles for many of the names mentioned in the box, normally articles are written first and then they get added to a category/list or template, not the other way around :) Those names which have an article are simply picked up randomly from the existing Kurdish poets and writers categories. The editor who has come across a list of Kurdish writers in a new source (BSOAS), is advised to add those names to the article
2516:. Flawed but useful sums it up well. Articles do tend to change rapidly as more details of a person's death become known and as obituaries are published, and it is well worth marking articles likely to change in that way. Rewoerding it to indicate that it's not just details of the death that may change may be appropriate for that reason, too. If a major problem is maintenance it would be very easy to get a bot to remove it from any articles where the date of death is listed as more than a month earlier.
341:- Since there are no contributors to dmoz2 to notify per TfD guidelines, I have notified all active past participants in the similar dmoz TfD discussion, and the dmoz talk page. Per guidelines, I initially notified all talk pages of articles using dmoz2. I later found that a number of articles use the dmoz2 search without using the template, so I notified their talk pages also. I hope that covers most of the interested parties and stimulates discussion.
3424:
afterwards. I also disagree partially with his/her second point: there certainly needs to be a standard removal point for the template (14 days sounds good to me), but this is a point of contention, and no such period of time has been established. I've seen many editors argue that the template should stay for at least a month, and even one that thought it should stay for six months.
2638:. The use of this template is flawed. It is intended for use in articles where "information pertaining to the circumstances of the person's death and surrounding events may change rapidly", however, it is routinely added to almost EVERY death. It just creates a mess that someone has to eventually clean up. In the unlikely event that information does change rapidly (for example,
3525:. The "information about death may change rapidly" bit may be silly in some cases, but in general articles do need to be reworked once their subject is dead, if only to change things to the past tense. Perhaps the subtext should instead imply that the article is being edited in light of the person's death and may not be up to its usual standard of quality. —
957:, is to organize things in categories. Linking to the appropriate ODP page is sometimes useful, but we should pick the best ODP category, and trust that it will link appropriately further. Play to its strength, not its weakness. The categorization and internal "see also" and "related category" linking is really the point of the ODP. For example, for
3481:- I don't agree with the nom. If you really see this template as a problem, why not have a bot programmed to remove it from pages it's been sitting on for a while? I don't see how you fail to note its usefulness. It alerts unsuspecting individuals that the page they are viewing is about someone who just died. That's good enough for me.
4750:. The opening says : 1- This navbox ...have been created by a ... editor in order to pursue his agenda.2- The template relies on a nationalistic definition.3- Most of the entries are not linked.4- If we included every item of Kurdish literature the box would be unmanageably big, I would say this is a job much better done by categories.
700:- While reviewing the Dmoz TfD discussion, I was reminded by another editor's disclosure that I should perhaps disclose that I am also a DMOZ volunteer editor. I can't imagine how this TfD could effect me as a DMOZ editor and it was not a factor in making this nomination, but in the interest of full transparency I am now disclosed.
557:. Also, Dmoz2 includes a "suggest a site" link (i.e., an invitation to submit a URL to ODP), which I think is an inappropriate bit of promotion. Furthermore, Dmoz2 is used (as of this writing) in only 4 articles, which leads one to ask whether it serves a useful purpose. Examining those 4 uses, in one case (
4406:
No I have been having issues with other articles with ChrisO. He has pushed one of his friends to put this for deletion. If there was a problem with such templates, then tempaltes that have existed for a few years should be put up for deletion as well. So when I created this template, it was based
4040:
per davidwr. The template can be changed but the premise is very helpful for an encyclopedia. It alerts the reader that significant changes in the article might be underway if the death was controversial or unexpected. Note that problems created by inappropriately using the template do not reflect
899:
The DDCs "Relative Index assembles the disciplinary aspects of the subject of clothing in one place" by listing the various discipline categories under which the subject's various aspects fall. The subject search of the ODP is analogous to the
Relative Index of the DDC in that it lists the categories
4907:
Maybe you're thinking of portal links (which are actually considered content pages)? I'm not aware of any templates intended for linking to wiki-project pages from articles, or of any reason to do so. Information to the effect of "this article is in the scope of this wiki-project" is no more germane
4417:
be put up for deletion. It is interesting if there was a problem with such templates, they have not been put up for deletion (and some of them have existed for at least two years), yet all of the sudden that I am having a problem with ChrisO, he shows up and one of his friend's makes a comment that
3392:
This template does not at all imply that
Knowledge (XXG) is censoring the current article. It instead implies that government officials or the family of the deceased may be keeping some important information confidential from the public, or that there is currently an investigation into the death of
3326:
This template provides a quick header for articles in a state of flux and explains that not all information is necessarily available. Just because the template is there doesn't mean it should be used every time someone dies. Conversely just because it is used sometimes doesn't mean it has to be used
2406:
In 90% (or 95%, even) of all cases, the template is simply not useful. The template tells the reader that information regarding a person's death "may change rapidly as more facts become known", which is quite misleading. Sure, information "may" change rapidly, but in nearly all cases, they don't. In
513:
First, I'm including dmoz3 in my opinion, it was added to this TfD after my comments above. Second, I think GRuban makes a strong argument below about why the dmoz "see also" sections maintained and selected by them are better than any category searches that we add here. so I'm changing my opinion
4152:
This navbox appears to have been created by a tendentious editor in order to pursue his agenda. The template relies on a nationalistic definition. Most of the entries are not linked. If we included every item of
Kurdish literature the box would be unmanageably big, I would say this is a job much
3757:
The template serves an important purpose, given that articles about notable folks who have recently passed away seem to see a spike in traffic and thus a potential spike in edits, potentially from readers who may not be familiar with our guidelines for verifiability and reliable sourcing. Alerting
3178:
of people that have recently died, not edits to the articles of people that have recently died. Things that happened over a week ago can still be considered "recent." Of the 85 articles you removed the tag from on
November 4, the oldest date of death I noticed was September 25. That's 9 days over a
2589:
You're looking at "the date of his death" from the UTC viewpoint. He was in New
Zealand, which is where most of the edits were - and that's 12 hours ahead of UTC. Once that's taken into account, there were 13 edits on the day of his death, and a further 13 over the following two weeks. Compare that
2295:
template makes sense, as it links to a human-crafted category. These link to search results which, being machine-crafted, may or may not bring back suitable results. Further, the search engine built into DMOZ is so poor as to be practically useless. Besides, listings in DMOZ that match the keywords
299:
There is no common sense to it since the same argument can be made for a newspaper search page. The Dmoz1 template serves a very good purpose. But making a template that directly violates a guideline, and the spirit of the guideline makes no sense at all. (And unlike Google, the thing isn't used
4770:
per Heja and
Flowerparty. If the template is to be created, it should be divided into two as "Template:Gorani litaterature" & "TemplateSorani-Kurmanji literature", since we have here Template:Turkish literature and Template:Azeri Turkish literature, even though Turkish and Azeri languages are
3423:
I disagree strongly with the nominator's first argument - the full details of a person's death are rarely, if ever, known immediately afterward. This is especially true when the deaths are unexpected (accidents and murders). In such cases, new information comes to light for weeks, sometimes years,
3250:
just substitutes one slightly confusing template with something that's even more confusing when used for this purpose. I don't see what's wrong with having this template on an article for two weeks or more, even if the article is only minimally edited in that time. Someone needs to deal with the
3126:
14 days was an arbitrary number chosen by me. Editing in all articles in that category has been resumed to a normal amount after that time. One week is a much better time for removal, tho, since nearly all articles about the recently dead change back to normal editing after just a few days. Only a
2422:
articles about people who died more than 14 days ago. That's more than half of all articles that contained the template. Sometimes the template was used in articles for more than a month without anyone removing it. Not to mention that there was no kind of rapid change in any of the articles that I
2229:
Notes: 1. search string contains category filter; 2. No matches in subject category because the only item doesn't have subject in description; 3. 1 of 2 results is a mis-match; 4. Possible abuse because site name appears to be used as search string; 5. Unusual results merits investigation; 6.
3911:
per nom. If someone dies, the death date will appear on the very first line of the article, where it should per the manual of style. If "information, such as that pertaining to the circumstances of the person's death and surrounding events, may change", it should say so in the article where these
565:
the Dmoz2 template is useful, as it produces a list of several different ODP categories related to Batman (movies, video games, cartoons, etc.); it would not be possible to find this collection by linking to any one category at ODP. However, the Batman "suggest a site" link does not work properly
4884:
Inappropriate self-reference, widely used on category pages to promote wiki-projects. There is a suggestion on the talk page to use it on category_talk pages instead but this is being ignored. It would be redundant to our wide array of standardly formatted project-specific talk page banner-cruft
2533:
Can you point me to some articles that did change rapidly after the subject of the article died? I've removed the template from 85 articles, as I said above, and at most those articles received 10-40 edits the day of the death, and that was it. After that, those articles didn't get more or less
2261:
Search #23, the topix search, is cited in the article to support the statement that the Open
Directory has a huge number of links to topix.com. That is a primary source that verges on original research (but the statement is true, and it's better sourced than many other statements that have been
3308:
per PixelFace above. I recognise the problems with this template, particularly the fact that it tends to remain on articles long after their death is 'current' - but for the value it has in keeping track of edits to pages of recently dead people, it's worth keeping. Perhaps adding some sort of
2773:
but change documentation, add a "day" field, and include an automatic "update after 2 weeks from today's date" logic. This may require that it become a subst: template but that's okay. If the template is not changed, it's easy enough to create a bot that will sweep all articles that use this
2903:
As a rule of thumb, "Recent" means either in the last week or that a significant number of edits that would not have occurred but for the person's death have been made in the last week and those edits have been happening pretty much continuously since the death was announced. In other words,
4193:, that is true to an extent, but then the font can be made smaller and I think we are speaking about prominent and historic poets. So It will not be that big. The template is actually informative. If it grows too large, then it can be categorized such as the french literature portal. --
4726:
It makes the rationale of the nominator wrong obviously, since he makes baseless accusations for nomination. If he was fair, he would have deleted stuff that has existed at least three years ago. So the correct course of action would be to nominate all such templates for deletion.
281:- I agree completely, but its conflict with the guideline invites reversion by sincere and diligent spam fighters, making its legitimate use contentious and difficult. However, a strong consensus to keep it will provide a good argument to add a specific exception for dmoz searches to
4752:
Answers:1- We may not judge about editors , but their edits. 2-Why? 3- That's a weak point but that does not mean to delete the template :at must , only delete the entries that are not linked 4- Almost any navbox is doing so : then we may always use categories instead of navboxs
244:- it can help provide more accurate results for subjects that do not mirror DMOZ categories. The Open Directory Project has long been encouraged as a solution to extended disputes over external link sections; we should not remove a helpful tool. Keep in mind that WP:EL is a
3144:
As I mentioned above, it would probably be extremely simplke to get a bot to remove this template from articles if it's been left on for more than a set length of time. I realise that there may be cases to be made for longer or shorter periods (in the case of articles like
3351:. It just makes sense to post that information front and center for a famous person who just died. The "information may change" part is silly and probably should be removed. Maybe it can be removed after two weeks with an automatic program, if someone can design that.
2611:
Fair enough, that's definitely a sharp increase, relatively speaking. But I'm still not convinced that we need to tell our readers about it as long as that sharp increase means "26 edits in 2 weeks". 260 edits would warrant a notice for our readers, but 26? Nope.
3758:
folks that the information in a particular article could change considerably or rapidly is a reasonable course of action, and the template should be kept as such (although there is certainly grounds for improvement, which can grow out of the discussion above).
653:, which don't appear in the backlinks. (This list also displays 63 more uses in non-article namespaces as well - I couldn't figure out how to filter those out of the external link search). I didn't look at these in detail, only to notify their discussions.
969:
search provides. If we treat it as a search engine, we'd be better off linking to Google and company, since they list more sites, and has a better search. We've decided not to do that, for good reasons. (Former ODP editor - long time ago. Hi, Orlady. :-))
2841:- I agree with the fact that after some day from the person's death this template should be eliminated from the page of the article. But I think that this template should rest because it's effectively possible that news about a person's death may change.
2808:
with the current template. Create an expanded template for current that mentions the person recently died. This would reduce the number of templates. The lack of usage on above mentioned articles suggests to me that a merge would be better.
623:
Changed my opinion from "very weak keep" to "delete" based upon further reflection and subsequent comments. Contributors might continue to create links to Dmoz search pages, but they should be encouraged to do so by the existence of a template.
774:. The template directly violates the external links guideline and thus should never be used, and immediately removed any time it has been used. There certainly can be no justification for allowing a template to exist that can never be used.
3587:
Useful enough to outweigh its awkwardness. I'm no programming genius, but I wonder if a bot could be created (in the same way as the ones that remove outdated protection templates) to remove the template, say, 14 days after it was added?
2975:
of the article can change rapidly, due to the death being reported in the news. And I really didn't know the time limit to keep the template on a page was 14 days. Why 14 days? Isn't a month also "recent"? I suppose editors could add
3657:. What has changed? It's useful, although a date parameter to aid in more prompt removal would be very useful, especially if a bot would get programmed. Sometimes thinks do change rapidly after a death and other times it doesn't.
2594:. Even if you count the UTC time as the day, there were still more edits in the following two weeks than in the previous ten months. I'd call that a sharp increase in editing that lasted for more than just the day of his death.
3623:
as it is a very useful template. I agree that it could use some updating to include a date template (as suggested above) and perhaps have a bot assigned to remove any that have been in place for more than 7 or so days.
3012:
It's quicker to type? That's your argument? Seriously, since when do we allow for conspicuous self references purely for the convenience of a handful of our editors? Couldn't a list of recent deaths be generated using
4343:
per
Nepaheshgar's comment. Obviously Azerbaijani Turks is not "Turkish" literature, nor is "Persian" literature synonymous with Iranian literature. It is a highly informative template, and that's our purpose here.
470:#9. But in any case, these are "links to be avoided", not "links that should never be used". In my experience, the dmoz template helps reduce spam problems in articles and provides useful information to readers.
3179:
month. Most of the death dates I saw were less than a month ago. I seriously don't see the big deal with this tag being in an article for a month (or more if the death is still in the news). Then you can look at
321:
I'm inclined to agree with Ckatz. DMOZ is clearly not commercially bias, if often not very helpful. Probably worthwhile ot our
Readers now and then (not obviously a problem) and perhaps worthy of an exception.
3032:
If you can willfully ignore everything else I said, I'm confident you'll be able to ignore this "intrusive" template when you come across it. This template is as intrusive as *any* other current events tag or
2684:
Doesn't really add anything. If someone who is very notable dies today, then chances are their article will be protected against vandalism. It's being over-used to highlight one thing about a person's bio.
849:- the ODP search is really a subsidiary function of the Open Directory; its proper use is more to find category pages than sites. The primary interface of the Open Directory are the category pages. Should
3929:
My initial thoughts were towards keeping this, as I have used it often in the past, without much thought. On reflection, I am not sure what use, if any, it actully serves other than the very rare cases
2998:
is quicker to type at the top, and when the template is removed, the categories are automatically removed. Editors need to stop ignoring the related changes tool when nominating things for deletion. --
2576:
are the changes in the three days mentioned. Do we really need to tell our readers about a mild increase in editing? IMHO, That article is a good example where the template isn't really useful. --
3835:
The template adds nothing that cannot be stated more clearly and with less ambiguity in the lede and the relevant section of the article, along with appropriate citations. Functionally a copy of
1317:
3957:
I think that it should be kept but could be changed. I say this because based on the person's death the info could change rapidly but sometimes the info comes out a year after the death like
3602:- Very useful, although perhaps add a date field (eg: This article is about a person who died November 6th, 2008). Also, maybe a bot could remove the template a week after the person died.
3094:, wondering why all those people are in there. Those two categories are tied to this tag. When the tag is added, the categories are added. When the tag is removed, the categories are removed.
3678:: Not perfect, but rather useful; usually more appropriate than the current event template. Maybe, someone could set up a bot that automatically removes the template after, say, 2 weeks? --
1432:
4178:. Sounds like someone pushed the above user to make up such lies. One should check his Knowledge (XXG) record against mine to see who is exactly the tendentious editor. 2) Next claim:
2083:
4551:
It would be far better if you discuss your rationale for not deleting the template, rather than engaging in personal attacks. The main issue here is that we already have categories for
3123:
might useful, but as you said, it can just as well be added (and removed) to the article manually. I don't see how that's any easier or harder to do than adding and removing a template.
3097:
The template is not just for people who follow related changes. I don't know why you assume readers do not want to know that a person just died or that such information is intrusive. --
4438:
This is a ridiculous personal attack. For the record, I have never had any contact with any editor about this template, nor have I propositioned anyone to nominate it for deletion. --
2971:
is immensely useful as a watchlist of articles about people who have recently died, articles that receive frequent bursts of editing. The language of the template can be changed. The
900:
in which sites on a given subject are currently indexed by the ODP. The ODP takes it one step further by also listing indexed sites and their categories below the list of categories.
42:
37:
4483:. As somebody who has written many articles regarding Kurdish poets and writers, I find the template quite unnecessary and full of mistakes. At the moment, a quite large section of
3654:
2572:
At the date of his death, the article was edited 15 times. The next day it was edited 6 times, and the next one it was edited once. I wouldn't exactly call that a swarm of edits.
2722:
I find this template very useful, and adds a lot to the article, becaue it is a recent event, but more so a recent death, which makes no sense to want to delete this template.--
574:, the link points to a search result that lists several different relevant categories; however, that article would be better served by a direct link to the single ODP category
570:
the link points to a search results list, but it's apparent from the search results that ODP doesn't have a category or much in the way of useful content about this topic. In
965:
which has prominent "see also" links to the animated cartoons, the live action movies, the games, and the toys, which in turn similarly link to all the other categories the
384:, a widely accepted standard and style guide, as a valid and useful external link. With all due respect, this nomination is a waste of time if you can't change consensus at
3209:, but the template has the added benefit of notifying readers, at the top of the article, that the person just died and that the contents of the article may be in flux. --
2470:
Those two articles are pretty bad examples for your cause, actually, considering that neither articles ever used the Recent death template in the first place. Both used
4986:
for
Wikipedian collaboration should not be in areas of the project intended for readers (which the category namespace is). If I'm a reader who clicks on (for example)
4144:
2427:
So I propose to either delete this template, or (if there'll be no consensus for that) change the template documentation to instruct our editors to use it only when
4126:
3862:- May be flawed but is needed in cases where disruption may occur: suspicious deaths, murders; it is important when dealing with a particularly high-profile death.
3082:), Conti will probably be complaining about removing 170 categories from 85 articles -- and if some other editor has gotten to an article before Conti and removed
2498:
change rapidly, the template would be used at 1-2 articles at the same time, at most. I wouldn't be opposed to that, but it just doesn't seem that useful to me. --
2456:
come to minds -- and this template does alert a reader to the situation. Is it used perfectly, no, but that's reason to improve processes not delete the template.
561:) the template lists the entire ODP category path as a search term, with the effect that the search produces zero results, but the "suggest a site" link works. In
4908:
to the general reader or re-user of our content than saying "this article was the subject of a 2006 ArbCom case" or "this article is currently being discussed on
3447:
The "Current Event" template could be confusing to people who haven't heard about the death. I'd rather err on the side of too much information than not enough.
4650:
of these templates for deletion, with a rationale based solely on the value of the concept of the templates themselves, then I would be willing to re-evaluate.
4771:
mutually intelligible. The entries in the template should also be checked and only the notable ones should stay. Otherwise, it's better to rely on categories.
4876:
4858:
2710:
change. It's patronising to shout this out to our readers in this special case. In reality this template merely adds a distasteful taint to proceedings.
2664:
4189:
There are many templates like this: Turkish Literature for example. Half the enteries are linked and 40 of them are mentioned in one article in BSOAS.
2394:
4535:
so the vote is not good faith. But I know Awraman dialect to a good level and I read poetry in it fluently. That was a typo and it has been fixed. --
2448:
It's flawed but its useful. There have been a number of situations where the circumstances of death and details about the individual changed rapidly --
793:
don't' want in external links: something that we have no idea what will actually turn up when you click the link! Search results are deprecated under
4487:
has been dedicated to famous and renowned people in Kurdish literature, which makes the current haphazard box unnecessary. We also have categories for
4326:
and many more. These templates had existed a long time, and it invalidates the reasoning by the nominator who is claiming that this is off track. --
547:, which provides a link to an ODP directory category related to the article topic. I think most of the above comments are in support of that template.
4277:
literature written in various languages and doesn't have the possible political implications. I wonder if the author of the template was aware of the
2376:
4646:
of templates are useful and somewhat standard, and the motivations of the creators and current contents are irrelevant. If someone were to nominate
2411:
there is something to report, rarely will any information change "rapidly". So what, exactly, are we trying to tell our readers with the template?
3078:
to articles manually, and separately. Then instead of taking half an hour to remove 85 templates from 85 articles (which nobody told Conti to do
2494:
was edited heavily for just about 5 days before editing calmed down again. If we'd use this template only on articles where information actually
591:) where ODP has several very relevant categories that cannot be identified by linking to a single ODP category. Also, remove this template from
21:
4606:
2826:- See no point in this template. It should be clear in the lead. Besides, of course information may change rapidly, this is a Wiki after all.
4023:. If something has problems, we should change it, not delete it. Of course, almost no one here can, only freaking administrators can, but...
603:. (I am itching to edit the template and articles, but did not do so yet because I wanted them to be available to illustrate my comments.) --
3726:
3716:
3183:
and see all the notable people who've died in the past month. It's fascinating. Now, someone wanting that information *could* also look at
2810:
3795:
know that the details probably aren't completely in yet. I !vote for a diefinite keep for these reasons. It's flawed, but it's just like
553:
However, Dmoz2 is different. It provides a link not to an ODP category, but to a search results page at ODP, which on its face violates
168:
132:
4407:
on other such templates. The nominators comment though are basically ChrisO's point of view. It is only fair then all such templates:
3734:
649:- Great analysis of the four Dmoz2 uses! Unfortunately, the use is a little more pervasive than it at first appears because of 28 more
17:
150:
114:
4182:. Again what is so nationalistic about mentioning bunch of poets who wrote in a language? Here are other types of these templates:
4456:
comment* okay my apologies. I was debating another issue with you then and this came up. So no harm or personal attack intended.--
3873:
4120:
3491:
3452:
4383:
3432:
583:
Keep the template, but delete the "suggest a site" element from the template and add template documentation that explains that
448:
401:
873:
links as the argument for the add cgi is an ODP category path not a search term. (Disclosure: I am an Open Directory editor.)
3041:
has over 307,000 articles in it. They're not going to live forever. It may seem trivial to you, but it *is* quicker to type "
4991:
4666:
4626:
3610:
3508:
serves the same purpose, and whilst being less descriptive, it has a better track record of being maintained properly. --
2916:
2790:
4701:
4564:
798:
5033:
4821:
4795:
4091:
4065:
2341:
2315:
79:
4676:
4636:
4596:
4116:
4075:
3448:
3034:
2246:
1964:
932:
262:
5018:
5003:
4974:
4951:
4920:
4902:
4889:
4841:
4780:
4762:
4736:
4717:
4691:
4654:
4576:
4544:
4520:
4465:
4447:
4429:
4391:
4353:
4335:
4308:
4290:
4241:
4215:
4202:
4166:
4109:
4050:
4032:
4015:
3998:
3984:
3949:
3921:
3903:
3878:
3854:
3827:
3771:
3748:
3704:
3687:
3670:
3645:
3630:
3615:
3594:
3579:
3558:
3531:
3517:
3496:
3473:
3456:
3439:
3425:
3411:
3380:
3360:
3339:
3318:
3300:
3284:
3218:
3161:
3139:
3106:
3027:
3007:
2947:
2926:
2891:
2870:
2850:
2833:
2818:
2800:
2763:
2749:
2731:
2714:
2698:
2676:
2655:
2620:
2606:
2584:
2567:
2542:
2528:
2506:
2465:
2439:
2370:
2359:
2300:
2275:
2250:
994:
979:
941:
909:
882:
810:
783:
766:
709:
691:
662:
633:
612:
523:
508:
480:
453:
406:
369:
350:
331:
309:
294:
269:
236:
211:
193:
97:
4852:
3779:- The "recent deaths" page is linked on the main page. When a user clicks on that page, some want to find out why
495:
template, not the dmoz template. I have only used the latter and it appears that the dmoz2 template does violate
4704:
arguments. The existence of other templates which may or may not have similar problems has no bearing on whether
3799:
3566:. The story about a living person may also change rapidly. Add a death date is enough to note about one's death.
3372:. 95% of the time the person/event is NOT changing rapidly and it is common sense that nothing is set in stone.
3356:
2920:
2794:
5032:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4820:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4794:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4090:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4064:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
3195:
each other. And categories can be used as watchlists with the related changes tool. It's just as easy to remove
3167:
2964:
2340:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2314:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
433:
78:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4250:
2814:
2296:
will rank highly in the search results for any of the major search engines. (Disclosure: I am a DMOZ editor). —
1427:
3969:. So it could be changed to mention that depending on the situation the info could change rapidly or slowly.--
3934:
comes to mind) where there is heavy editing immeditely after a subject's death. In those very rare cases then
3730:
3720:
3369:
4848:
4805:
3023:
or something? That would be far less intrusive for the 99% of readers who are not following related changes.
2778:" to the end of the template. People watching the article should see the change and act on it if necessary.
587:
should be used for almost all links to ODP, and that this template should be used only in instances (such as
4917:
4886:
4758:
4687:
4258:
4046:
3091:
3087:
3071:
3063:
3052:
2977:
2956:
3980:
3083:
2774:
template the middle of every month, check for anything that's not the current month, and add "update after|
2234:
1198:
4837:
4572:
4560:
4516:
4484:
3900:
3821:
3271:
tags that are many months old. Perhaps someone should have a bot for finding these and dealing with them.
3196:
3188:
3180:
3171:
3166:
This template benefits editors *and* readers. Putting this template on the talk page would make it so the
3120:
3075:
3067:
3056:
3038:
2981:
2968:
2960:
2547:
Well, I know full well that I edited a few articles once I saw details in published obituaries. ISTR that
2263:
1926:
1887:
1351:
806:
366:
3017:
1132:
144:
108:
4999:
4732:
4540:
4461:
4425:
4349:
4331:
4286:
4237:
4212:
4198:
3994:
very useful template; the problems can be resolved by editing the template, not by deleting it. Thanks,
3314:
3203:
3045:
3024:
2992:
2867:
2740:
While less-traveled bios will not benefit as much from this, often edited articles need this template.
2711:
2479:
2366:
2325:
1969:
936:
466:- I've think I've only used this template to link to categories so that use doesn't technically violate
207:
801:
or "common sense" is perfectly capable of adding a search link without using these "handy" templates.
4713:
4443:
4304:
1931:
4616:
3850:
3664:
3589:
3487:
3407:
3352:
3278:
2846:
2842:
2727:
2639:
1734:
1739:
966:
863:
853:
843:
833:
751:
741:
675:
140:
104:
63:
4995:
4378:
3554:
3310:
3265:
3230:. Somewhat flawed in its wording, but it serves a purpose. If it's just deleted, people will use
3214:
3102:
3003:
2745:
1662:
444:
397:
203:
4708:
template should be kept. "Other stuff exists" arguments are quite irrelevant to that question. --
4563:
has been dedicated to Kurdish writers, so there is really no need to create yet another template.
4281:
template? The characterisation of "tendentious" for the author of this template is unfortunate.
3328:
1586:
1054:
5015:
4899:
4754:
4709:
4683:
4504:
4439:
4300:
4254:
4042:
4028:
3970:
3513:
3469:
3378:
3155:
2943:
2830:
2672:
2600:
2561:
2522:
2461:
1581:
1093:
1049:
991:
762:
4415:
4324:
3115:
Actually, templates like these are supposed to be solely for our readers. Any templates for our
2904:"recent" is "until the noise dies down, plus a few days" or "a few days," whichever is longer.
1854:
1279:
727:
deletion request that it was such a useful template, this one is not. However, since there is a
4814:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
4084:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
2334:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1777:
72:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
4833:
4776:
4568:
4512:
3897:
3683:
3608:
2912:
2887:
2786:
2694:
1815:
1701:
1548:
954:
878:
802:
592:
567:
519:
504:
476:
363:
1509:
1356:
794:
671:
359:
282:
181:
4946:
4938:
4728:
4536:
4457:
4421:
4367:
4345:
4327:
4282:
4233:
4194:
4104:
3938:
3917:
3869:
3839:
3700:
3543:
3505:
3348:
3297:
3255:
3251:
maintenance task of cleaning up the old ones. Okay, WP has a lot of such tasks. I've seen
3244:
3234:
3128:
2985:
2863:
2643:
2534:
attention than any other article. And that's nothing we need to inform our readers about. --
2487:
2471:
2428:
2354:
2271:
2198:
1849:
1274:
975:
687:
629:
608:
92:
4913:
4909:
4898:, We've ALWAYS done that on articles, so what's the big deal about doing it on Categories?
4363:
3192:
2706:. The usefulness of this kind of template is assumed as a matter of faith. Information can
1471:
4556:
4492:
4278:
4011:
3846:
3695:- yeah as has been said, it's not useful and generally the articles don't change rapidly.
3659:
3574:
3549:
template, there are far too many inherent problems with this specific template as noted.
3482:
3394:
3273:
3136:
2723:
2617:
2581:
2539:
2503:
2436:
2297:
2242:
1772:
926:
905:
731:
705:
658:
346:
290:
260:
232:
189:
1394:
554:
496:
467:
385:
381:
2045:
1203:
4987:
4373:
4007:
3995:
3945:
3744:
3550:
3210:
3184:
3098:
2999:
2759:
2741:
2667:
will explain why this editor does not feel this template serves the encyclopedia well.
2651:
2078:
1696:
1543:
779:
438:
391:
305:
2407:
most cases, there's simply nothing further to report after a person's death. And even
2007:
1241:
1171:
5012:
4969:
4963:
4161:
4155:
4024:
3958:
3890:
3810:
3625:
3527:
3509:
3465:
3373:
3150:
3146:
2939:
2827:
2668:
2595:
2556:
2517:
2475:
2457:
2453:
2289:
1892:
1810:
1657:
1624:
1312:
988:
950:
949:, much as per Tschild's argument. The main reason for the continued existence of any
823:
758:
721:
584:
548:
544:
422:
224:
4228:
4183:
2122:
252:
I would suggest that this template is a good example of a common-sense exception. --
4772:
3962:
3679:
3640:
3603:
3293:
2905:
2880:
2859:
2779:
2687:
2548:
2193:
2160:
1504:
962:
874:
515:
500:
472:
327:
4412:
4408:
4322:
4319:
4932:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
4191:
If we included every item of Kurdish literature the box would be unmanageably big
3149:
there could be a case for very long "recent" periods) but two weeks sounds fair.
737:
template, it may be kept for talk pages only. I don't see any difference between
4994:
exists. These templates would be fine on talk pages, but not on category pages.
3931:
3913:
3864:
3764:
3696:
2267:
1466:
1389:
1127:
1088:
971:
683:
625:
604:
3638:
per nom. Conti is right, most of the time the template is not actually useful.
575:
4651:
4257:. This is the way that Jewish Literature is handled as well. For example, see
3966:
3568:
3132:
2613:
2577:
2535:
2499:
2491:
2483:
2449:
2432:
2238:
2230:
Hit means a match; 7. Uses both dmoz2 and non-template search. Investigate.
922:
901:
701:
654:
342:
286:
254:
228:
185:
3368:
I have always found this template and other current/future events to violate
362:#9, but can be used on article talk pages, and possibly in project space. —
4273:
etc." This might be a good way to handle this issue as it gives leeway for
3740:
2755:
2647:
775:
301:
4552:
4488:
596:
558:
4232:..etc. So either all such templates should be deleted or none of them.--
4227:
and click on different countries. Many of them will have such templates:
4211:
and rely on categories. Knowledge (XXG) has no mandate to define canons.
2040:
600:
571:
4370:. Let's try to focus on this template instead of similar templates. --
4274:
4262:
4230:
4225:
678:
to the discussion. It is similar to Dmoz2, and it isn't used anywhere.
323:
3070:
to an article. But if the template is deleted, editors will be adding
2938:
as an imperfect but very useful tool for both editors and readers. -
543:. When I was invited to this discussion, I thought that it was about
4270:
4266:
3759:
3131:
will be one) have rapid editing for longer than a handful of days. --
2486:, since both templates applied to that article at the time, but only
2478:
because he was missing, but not confirmed dead yet. I'm not sure why
2002:
1236:
1166:
958:
588:
562:
227:, which are encouraged by the guideline as a deterrent to link spam.
250:"it is best treated with common sense and the occasional exception."
797:#9 for good reasons. Anyone that actually wants to use this under
3393:
an individual and we currently do not have some important details.
1619:
651:
articles which use the same search link without using the template
3051:" at the top of the article than go down to the bottom and type "
967:
http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=Batman&morecat=1
5026:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
4788:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
4058:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2308:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2117:
4495:. Moreover, the current template is full of mistakes such as
2155:
3787:, just coffee-shop talk. And since this is Knowledge (XXG),
4041:
upon the template itself but the users who use it wrongly.
3309:
automated 'remove after X time' function would improve it.
3240:
instead, so delete is the same as merge. Merging in with
3062:
It is true that you don't need a template in order to add
380:- DMOZ templates reduce spam and are clearly explained in
3944:
is more than adequate and probably more appropriate. --
491:- I'm sorry, I just noticed. This TfD is about the dmoz
300:
on talk pages so keeping it around for that is silly.)
4990:, it is of no value to me to know that a corresponding
4870:
4864:
4533:
4532:
the above user has had serious history problems with me
4138:
4132:
2573:
2552:
2415:
2388:
2382:
650:
162:
156:
126:
120:
2414:
It is not being maintained. I just spent half an hour
418:- I originally thought this template worked much like
4916:". Reminders of this sort belong on the talk page. —
4253:
contains a section on Literature, which links here:
499:#9 and seems to me to be on much more shaky grounds.
219:- This nomination does not denigrate the use of DMOZ
4824:). No further edits should be made to this section.
4094:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2555:, which lasted for about two weeks after his death.
2344:). No further edits should be made to this section.
538:, but with editing of the template and documentation
358:. Should not normally be used in article-space per
82:). No further edits should be made to this section.
5036:). No further edits should be made to this section.
4937:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
4798:). No further edits should be made to this section.
4409:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Template:Turkish_Literature
4174:Buch of intidimation tactics by the above user. 1)
4068:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2318:). No further edits should be made to this section.
285:9, which I would then be willing to propose there.
3785:they have to know this information may not be true
566:because the link does not point to a category. In
4176:tendentious editor in order to pursue his agenda
963:http://www.dmoz.org/Arts/Comics/Titles/B/Batman/
4700:The above two "keeps" seem to me to be classic
3896:, so that "old" ones are easily detectable. —
5011:Should not be on pages intented for readers.
4180:template relies on a nationalistic definition
3464:per Unschool. This template is made of fail.
791:. This is exactly the sort of thing that we
8:
3886:. Should probably be rewritten, similar to
3539:per Unschool, this can be obviated with the
2590:to the nine edits over the entire previous
430:(which I should have done in the beginning)
4299:per nom and Flowerparty's observation. --
2663:. The problems with this tag are legion,
1007:
3789:any user can add this kind of information
595:and replace it with the Dmoz template in
432:, I now feel like this is a violation of
202:per nom - violates external link policy.
2878:And what is the definition of "recent"?
4961:, I think CharlotteWebb is right here.
4185:which were created even before this.
2402:I see two problems with this template:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion
3713:: I choose to withdraw this template,
757:, so the later should be deleted. --
7:
2646:is sufficient and more appropriate.
829:I don't see a strong reason to keep
4006:this useful template; I agree with
3174:would only show the changes to the
2955:, the template adds biographies to
2553:swarm of edits in January this year
4261:. Note the languages mentioned: "
4187:Most of the entiers are not linked
3090:, Conti will be rummaging through
28:
2551:was one such. Have a look at the
953:, such as the ODP, as opposed to
717:Having commented in the original
3347:I found the template useful at
2984:to the bottom of articles like
670:While we are on the subject, I
4829:The result of the debate was
3723:) 20:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
3655:This has been discussed before
428:, but upon further inspection
1:
5019:11:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
4982:per nom - templates intended
4842:20:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
4781:20:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4763:11:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
4737:23:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
4718:23:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
4692:03:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
4655:03:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
4607:Azerbaijani Turkic Literature
4577:19:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
4545:23:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
4466:23:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
4448:23:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
4110:08:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
4099:The result of the debate was
4051:02:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
4033:01:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
4016:19:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
3999:17:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
3985:18:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
3950:07:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
3922:18:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
3904:13:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
3879:05:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
3855:03:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
3828:03:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
3219:16:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
3119:go to the talk page instead.
3107:15:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
2360:08:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
2349:The result of the debate was
2301:18:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
2276:19:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
2251:22:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
995:22:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
980:16:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
942:11:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
910:21:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
883:17:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
869:be kept we should remove the
811:02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
784:22:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
767:20:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
710:18:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
692:16:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
663:20:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
634:04:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
613:15:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
524:12:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
509:14:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
481:11:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
454:18:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
407:11:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
370:08:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
351:07:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
332:03:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
310:22:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
176:This template uses a website
98:07:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
87:The result of the debate was
30:
5004:23:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
4975:12:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
4952:07:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
4943:07:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
4921:19:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
4903:14:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
4890:20:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
4521:03:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
4430:13:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
4392:01:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
4354:15:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
4336:05:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
4309:00:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
4291:15:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
4242:13:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
4216:09:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
4203:23:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
4167:12:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
3805:. Information, most likely,
3772:13:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
3749:23:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
3705:02:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
3688:09:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
3671:05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
3646:00:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
3631:22:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3616:21:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3595:18:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3580:17:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3559:15:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3532:14:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3518:09:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3497:06:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3474:05:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3457:04:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3440:02:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3412:03:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3381:00:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3361:23:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3340:22:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3319:22:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3301:21:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3285:20:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3162:05:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
3140:21:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3127:very few examples (I'm sure
3028:20:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
3008:20:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2948:19:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2927:19:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2892:19:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2871:19:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2851:18:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2834:17:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2819:17:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2801:14:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2764:12:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2750:12:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2732:12:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2715:08:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2699:07:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2677:07:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2656:23:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
2621:02:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2607:01:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2585:01:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2568:01:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2543:00:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
2529:23:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
2507:20:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
2466:19:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
2440:18:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
819:While strongly in favour of
295:17:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
270:06:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
248:, not a policy, and as such
237:05:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
212:23:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
194:22:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
4153:better done by categories.
4117:Template:Kurdish Literature
4076:Template:Kurdish Literature
3191:, but categories and lists
1965:Public awareness of science
180:, which violates guideline
5053:
4662:per Jayjg. Cannot see why
987:- Per Gruban's reasoning.
2431:could be used as well. --
1133:Alexithymia+questionnaire
5029:Please do not modify it.
4817:Please do not modify it.
4791:Please do not modify it.
4642:, etc. Presumably these
4567:is a very poor argument.
4418:is really his viewpoint.
4087:Please do not modify it.
4061:Please do not modify it.
2490:was used. Additionally,
2474:instead. It was used at
2337:Please do not modify it.
2311:Please do not modify it.
1970:scientific+communication
1428:Erhard Seminars Training
551:clearly should be kept.
75:Please do not modify it.
4849:Template:Catwikiproject
4838:(Unretiring slowly...!)
4806:Template:Catwikiproject
3092:Category:Current events
3088:Category:Current events
3072:Category:Current events
3064:Category:Current events
3053:Category:Current events
2978:Category:Current events
2957:Category:Current events
576:Computers:Internet:Chat
4561:List of Kurdish people
4485:List of Kurdish people
3449:Planninefromouterspace
3197:Category:Recent deaths
3189:Deaths in October 2008
3181:Category:Recent deaths
3172:Category:Recent deaths
3121:Category:Recent deaths
3076:Category:Recent deaths
3068:Category:Recent deaths
3057:Category:Recent deaths
3039:Category:Living people
2982:Category:Recent deaths
2969:Category:Recent deaths
2961:Category:Recent deaths
2264:Open Directory Project
1932:Pseudomyxoma+peritonei
1927:Pseudomyxoma peritonei
1888:Open Directory Project
1352:Dodge Charger (B-body)
514:to straight "delete".
4499:which should read as
3983:comment was added at
3961:or within hours like
3735:few or no other edits
3084:Category:Recent death
2480:Template:Recent death
2416:removing the template
2367:Template:Recent death
2326:Template:Recent death
1199:Carmen Group Lobbying
4992:WP:WikiProject Chess
4667:Hungarian literature
4627:Hungarian literature
4224:: Please look here:
3737:outside this topic.
2640:Alexander Litvinenko
1740:Latin+American+music
1735:Latin American music
961:, we should link to
4702:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
4672:should be kept and
4565:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
4559:, and a section of
4010:'s comment. EOZyo (
3823:(formerly Jonathan)
3199:as it is to remove
2285:both. The original
1663:Henry+Corbin:+World
799:WP:Ignore all rules
4682:should be removed
4677:Kurdish Literature
4637:Turkish Literature
4597:Persian literature
4505:Kurdish literature
4255:Kurdish_literature
2084:The+Iron+Giant (1)
1587:Insulin+resistance
1582:Insulin resistance
1055:accessible+tourism
1050:Accessible tourism
955:web search engines
4973:
4944:
4840:
4497:Ahmab Beg Komashi
4165:
3826:
3768:
3751:
3738:
3578:
3523:Keep and rephrase
3495:
3437:
3158:
3037:, which this is.
3035:temporal template
2925:
2924:
2799:
2798:
2603:
2564:
2525:
2254:
2237:comment added by
2227:
2226:
1318:crosswalk.com (1)
1094:Alexithymia+Depot
1017:DMOZ search subj
940:
593:Nuclear-free zone
568:Nuclear-free zone
452:
405:
267:
51:
50:
5044:
5031:
4967:
4936:
4934:
4880:
4836:
4819:
4793:
4681:
4675:
4671:
4665:
4641:
4635:
4631:
4625:
4621:
4615:
4611:
4605:
4601:
4595:
4501:Ahmad Beg Komasi
4386:
4381:
4376:
4368:User:Nepaheshgar
4318:Please see this
4159:
4148:
4089:
4063:
3976:
3973:
3943:
3937:
3895:
3889:
3867:
3844:
3838:
3824:
3820:
3817:
3814:
3804:
3800:current disaster
3798:
3769:
3766:
3762:
3739:
3724:
3667:
3662:
3644:
3628:
3572:
3548:
3542:
3530:
3506:Template:Current
3485:
3436:
3433:
3430:
3404:
3397:
3376:
3349:Michael Crichton
3337:
3281:
3276:
3270:
3264:
3260:
3254:
3249:
3243:
3239:
3233:
3208:
3202:
3156:
3129:Michael Crichton
3050:
3044:
3022:
3016:
2997:
2991:
2986:Michael Crichton
2910:
2909:
2901:Reply to Lugnuts
2883:
2784:
2783:
2690:
2644:Template:Current
2601:
2562:
2523:
2488:Template:Current
2472:Template:Current
2429:Template:Current
2398:
2339:
2313:
2294:
2288:
2253:
2231:
1855:microtonal+music
1850:Microtonal music
1280:creative+writing
1275:Creative writing
1008:
939:
937:Tohd8BohaithuGh1
868:
862:
858:
852:
848:
842:
838:
832:
828:
822:
756:
750:
746:
740:
736:
730:
726:
720:
442:
427:
421:
395:
259:
172:
136:
77:
47:
36:
31:
5052:
5051:
5047:
5046:
5045:
5043:
5042:
5041:
5040:
5034:deletion review
5027:
4930:
4847:
4822:deletion review
4815:
4809:
4802:
4796:deletion review
4789:
4679:
4673:
4669:
4663:
4639:
4633:
4629:
4623:
4619:
4613:
4609:
4603:
4599:
4593:
4557:Kurdish writers
4493:Kurdish writers
4384:
4379:
4374:
4279:Kurdish culture
4251:Kurdish culture
4249:: The template
4115:
4092:deletion review
4085:
4079:
4072:
4066:deletion review
4059:
3974:
3971:
3941:
3935:
3893:
3887:
3865:
3842:
3836:
3822:
3815:
3812:
3802:
3796:
3783:died. However,
3765:
3760:
3665:
3660:
3639:
3626:
3613:
3606:
3546:
3540:
3526:
3483:Lord Sesshomaru
3466:X MarX the Spot
3434:
3426:
3398:
3395:
3374:
3353:Crystal whacker
3329:
3279:
3274:
3268:
3262:
3258:
3252:
3247:
3241:
3237:
3231:
3206:
3200:
3168:related changes
3048:
3042:
3020:
3014:
2995:
2989:
2965:related changes
2881:
2688:
2482:wasn't used at
2365:
2342:deletion review
2335:
2329:
2322:
2316:deletion review
2309:
2292:
2286:
2232:
1778:medical+tourism
1773:Medical tourism
1032:hits in 5 cats
866:
860:
856:
850:
846:
840:
836:
830:
826:
820:
754:
748:
744:
738:
734:
728:
724:
718:
581:My bottom line:
434:WP:LINKSTOAVOID
425:
419:
265:
139:
103:
80:deletion review
73:
67:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
5050:
5048:
5039:
5038:
5022:
5021:
5006:
4988:Category:Chess
4977:
4955:
4954:
4935:
4927:
4926:
4925:
4924:
4923:
4882:
4881:
4827:
4826:
4810:
4808:
4803:
4801:
4800:
4784:
4783:
4765:
4751:
4744:
4743:
4742:
4741:
4740:
4739:
4721:
4720:
4695:
4694:
4657:
4586:
4585:
4584:
4583:
4582:
4581:
4580:
4579:
4524:
4523:
4477:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4473:
4472:
4471:
4470:
4469:
4468:
4451:
4450:
4433:
4432:
4395:
4394:
4357:
4356:
4338:
4312:
4311:
4259:Jewish culture
4219:
4218:
4150:
4149:
4097:
4096:
4080:
4078:
4073:
4071:
4070:
4054:
4053:
4035:
4018:
4001:
3989:
3952:
3924:
3906:
3881:
3857:
3830:
3774:
3767:(aka justen)
3752:
3727:121.96.114.195
3717:121.96.114.195
3715:it is useful.
3707:
3690:
3673:
3653:per Brentdax.
3648:
3633:
3618:
3611:
3604:
3597:
3582:
3561:
3534:
3520:
3499:
3476:
3459:
3442:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3384:
3383:
3370:WP:NOTCENSORED
3363:
3342:
3321:
3303:
3292:I concur with
3287:
3275:Randall Bart
3225:
3224:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3185:Deaths in 2008
3164:
3124:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3095:
3060:
2988:manually. But
2950:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2895:
2894:
2873:
2853:
2836:
2821:
2811:199.254.212.44
2803:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2734:
2717:
2701:
2679:
2658:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2425:
2424:
2412:
2400:
2399:
2347:
2346:
2330:
2328:
2323:
2321:
2320:
2304:
2303:
2279:
2278:
2225:
2224:
2222:
2219:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2207:
2204:
2201:
2196:
2191:
2187:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2178:
2175:
2172:
2169:
2166:
2163:
2158:
2153:
2149:
2148:
2146:
2143:
2140:
2137:
2134:
2131:
2128:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2111:
2110:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2098:
2095:
2092:
2089:
2086:
2081:
2079:The Iron Giant
2076:
2072:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2063:
2060:
2057:
2054:
2051:
2048:
2043:
2038:
2034:
2033:
2031:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2016:
2013:
2010:
2005:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1987:
1984:
1981:
1978:
1975:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1958:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1920:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1910:
1907:
1904:
1901:
1898:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1872:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1843:
1842:
1839:
1836:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1824:
1821:
1818:
1816:meta-knowledge
1813:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1801:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1789:
1786:
1783:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1754:
1751:
1748:
1745:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1719:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1702:james+marsters
1699:
1697:James Marsters
1694:
1690:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1668:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1604:
1601:
1598:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1549:Green+building
1546:
1544:Green building
1541:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1524:
1521:
1518:
1515:
1512:
1507:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1453:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1392:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1374:
1371:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1335:
1332:
1329:
1326:
1323:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1230:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1184:
1182:
1180:
1178:
1176:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1026:non-subj cats
1024:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1006:
1005:
998:
997:
982:
944:
915:
914:
913:
912:
898:
897:
886:
885:
814:
786:
769:
712:
676:Template:Dmoz3
668:
667:
666:
665:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
616:
615:
579:
552:
534:Very Weak Keep
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
459:
458:
457:
456:
410:
409:
373:
372:
353:
335:
334:
315:
314:
313:
312:
297:
273:
272:
263:
239:
214:
174:
173:
141:Template:Dmoz3
137:
105:Template:Dmoz2
85:
84:
68:
66:
64:Template:Dmoz2
61:
59:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5049:
5037:
5035:
5030:
5024:
5023:
5020:
5017:
5014:
5010:
5007:
5005:
5001:
4997:
4993:
4989:
4985:
4981:
4978:
4976:
4971:
4966:
4965:
4960:
4957:
4956:
4953:
4950:
4949:
4942:
4941:
4933:
4929:
4928:
4922:
4919:
4918:CharlotteWebb
4915:
4911:
4906:
4905:
4904:
4901:
4900:ViperSnake151
4897:
4894:
4893:
4892:
4891:
4888:
4887:CharlotteWebb
4878:
4875:
4872:
4869:
4866:
4865:transclusions
4863:
4860:
4857:
4854:
4850:
4846:
4845:
4844:
4843:
4839:
4835:
4832:
4825:
4823:
4818:
4812:
4811:
4807:
4804:
4799:
4797:
4792:
4786:
4785:
4782:
4778:
4774:
4769:
4766:
4764:
4760:
4756:
4755:Alborz Fallah
4749:
4746:
4745:
4738:
4734:
4730:
4725:
4724:
4723:
4722:
4719:
4715:
4711:
4707:
4703:
4699:
4698:
4697:
4696:
4693:
4689:
4685:
4684:Alex Bakharev
4678:
4668:
4661:
4658:
4656:
4653:
4649:
4645:
4638:
4628:
4618:
4608:
4598:
4591:
4588:
4587:
4578:
4574:
4570:
4566:
4562:
4558:
4554:
4553:Kurdish poets
4550:
4549:
4548:
4547:
4546:
4542:
4538:
4534:
4531:
4528:
4527:
4526:
4525:
4522:
4518:
4514:
4510:
4506:
4502:
4498:
4494:
4490:
4489:Kurdish poets
4486:
4482:
4479:
4478:
4467:
4463:
4459:
4455:
4454:
4453:
4452:
4449:
4445:
4441:
4437:
4436:
4435:
4434:
4431:
4427:
4423:
4419:
4416:
4413:
4410:
4404:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4398:
4397:
4396:
4393:
4389:
4388:
4387:
4382:
4377:
4369:
4365:
4362:
4359:
4358:
4355:
4351:
4347:
4342:
4339:
4337:
4333:
4329:
4325:
4323:
4320:
4317:
4314:
4313:
4310:
4306:
4302:
4298:
4295:
4294:
4293:
4292:
4288:
4284:
4280:
4276:
4272:
4268:
4264:
4260:
4256:
4252:
4248:
4244:
4243:
4239:
4235:
4231:
4229:
4226:
4223:
4217:
4214:
4210:
4207:
4206:
4205:
4204:
4200:
4196:
4192:
4188:
4184:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4168:
4163:
4158:
4157:
4146:
4143:
4140:
4137:
4134:
4133:transclusions
4131:
4128:
4125:
4122:
4118:
4114:
4113:
4112:
4111:
4108:
4107:
4102:
4095:
4093:
4088:
4082:
4081:
4077:
4074:
4069:
4067:
4062:
4056:
4055:
4052:
4048:
4044:
4043:Themfromspace
4039:
4036:
4034:
4030:
4026:
4022:
4019:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4005:
4002:
4000:
3997:
3993:
3990:
3988:
3986:
3982:
3977:
3968:
3964:
3960:
3959:Steve Fossett
3956:
3953:
3951:
3947:
3940:
3933:
3928:
3925:
3923:
3919:
3915:
3910:
3907:
3905:
3902:
3899:
3892:
3885:
3882:
3880:
3877:
3876:
3875:
3872:
3871:
3868:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3852:
3848:
3841:
3834:
3831:
3829:
3825:
3819:
3818:
3808:
3801:
3794:
3790:
3786:
3782:
3778:
3775:
3773:
3770:
3763:
3756:
3753:
3750:
3746:
3742:
3736:
3732:
3728:
3722:
3718:
3714:
3712:
3708:
3706:
3702:
3698:
3694:
3691:
3689:
3685:
3681:
3677:
3674:
3672:
3669:
3668:
3663:
3656:
3652:
3649:
3647:
3642:
3637:
3634:
3632:
3629:
3622:
3619:
3617:
3614:
3609:
3607:
3601:
3598:
3596:
3593:
3592:
3586:
3583:
3581:
3576:
3571:
3570:
3565:
3562:
3560:
3556:
3552:
3545:
3538:
3535:
3533:
3529:
3524:
3521:
3519:
3515:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3493:
3489:
3484:
3480:
3477:
3475:
3471:
3467:
3463:
3460:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3443:
3441:
3438:
3431:
3429:
3422:
3419:
3418:
3413:
3409:
3405:
3403:
3402:
3391:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3382:
3379:
3377:
3371:
3367:
3366:Strong delete
3364:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3343:
3341:
3338:
3336:
3334:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3288:
3286:
3283:
3282:
3277:
3267:
3257:
3246:
3236:
3229:
3226:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3205:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3186:
3182:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3159:
3152:
3148:
3147:Steve Fossett
3143:
3142:
3141:
3138:
3134:
3130:
3125:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3113:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3093:
3089:
3086:but not also
3085:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3058:
3054:
3047:
3040:
3036:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3026:
3019:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2994:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2974:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2954:
2951:
2949:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2934:
2933:
2928:
2922:
2918:
2914:
2907:
2902:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2884:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2837:
2835:
2832:
2829:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2781:
2777:
2772:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2721:
2718:
2716:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2702:
2700:
2696:
2692:
2691:
2683:
2680:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2659:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2634:
2622:
2619:
2615:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2605:
2604:
2597:
2593:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2566:
2565:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2541:
2537:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2527:
2526:
2519:
2515:
2512:
2508:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2476:Steve Fossett
2473:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2454:Steve Fossett
2451:
2447:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2421:
2417:
2413:
2410:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2387:
2384:
2383:transclusions
2381:
2378:
2375:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2352:
2345:
2343:
2338:
2332:
2331:
2327:
2324:
2319:
2317:
2312:
2306:
2305:
2302:
2299:
2291:
2284:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2260:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2223:
2220:
2217:
2214:
2211:
2208:
2205:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2195:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2182:
2179:
2176:
2173:
2170:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2151:
2150:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2138:
2135:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2113:
2112:
2108:
2105:
2102:
2099:
2096:
2093:
2090:
2087:
2085:
2082:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2070:
2067:
2064:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2044:
2042:
2039:
2036:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2026:
2023:
2020:
2017:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2001:
1998:
1997:
1994:
1991:
1988:
1985:
1982:
1979:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1960:
1959:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1922:
1921:
1917:
1914:
1911:
1908:
1905:
1902:
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1882:
1879:
1876:
1873:
1870:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1831:
1828:
1825:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1811:Metaknowledge
1809:
1806:
1805:
1802:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1790:
1787:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1768:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1714:
1711:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1691:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1658:James Hillman
1656:
1653:
1652:
1649:
1646:
1643:
1640:
1637:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1615:
1614:
1611:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1596:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1570:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1525:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1513:
1511:
1510:Genital+warts
1508:
1506:
1503:
1500:
1499:
1496:
1493:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1451:
1448:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1369:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1357:Dodge+Charger
1355:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1313:Crosswalk.com
1311:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1251:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1187:
1185:
1183:
1181:
1179:
1177:
1175:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1003:
1000:
999:
996:
993:
990:
986:
983:
981:
977:
973:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:web directory
948:
945:
943:
938:
934:
931:
928:
924:
920:
917:
916:
911:
907:
903:
895:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
865:
855:
845:
835:
825:
818:
815:
813:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
790:
787:
785:
781:
777:
773:
770:
768:
764:
760:
753:
743:
733:
723:
716:
713:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
645:
644:
643:
642:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:Template:Dmoz
582:
577:
573:
569:
564:
560:
556:
550:
549:Template:Dmoz
546:
545:Template:Dmoz
542:
539:
536:
535:
531:
525:
521:
517:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
488:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
460:
455:
450:
446:
441:
440:
435:
431:
424:
417:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
403:
399:
394:
393:
389:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
371:
368:
365:
361:
357:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
320:
317:
316:
311:
307:
303:
298:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
268:
266:
261:
257:
256:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:template:dmoz
222:
218:
215:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
157:transclusions
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
138:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:transclusions
119:
116:
113:
110:
106:
102:
101:
100:
99:
96:
95:
90:
83:
81:
76:
70:
69:
65:
62:
60:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
5028:
5025:
5008:
4983:
4979:
4962:
4958:
4947:
4939:
4931:
4914:village pump
4895:
4883:
4873:
4867:
4861:
4855:
4834:RyanGerbil10
4830:
4828:
4816:
4813:
4790:
4787:
4767:
4747:
4705:
4659:
4647:
4643:
4589:
4569:Heja Helweda
4529:
4513:Heja Helweda
4508:
4500:
4496:
4480:
4405:
4402:
4372:
4371:
4360:
4340:
4315:
4296:
4246:
4245:
4221:
4220:
4208:
4190:
4186:
4179:
4175:
4171:
4170:
4154:
4151:
4141:
4135:
4129:
4123:
4105:
4101:no consensus
4100:
4098:
4086:
4083:
4060:
4057:
4037:
4020:
4003:
3991:
3978:
3963:Bobby Murcer
3954:
3926:
3908:
3898:Arthur Rubin
3883:
3874:
3870:
3863:
3859:
3832:
3811:
3806:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3776:
3755:Strong keep.
3754:
3710:
3709:
3692:
3675:
3658:
3650:
3635:
3620:
3599:
3590:
3584:
3567:
3563:
3536:
3522:
3501:
3478:
3461:
3444:
3427:
3420:
3400:
3399:
3389:
3365:
3344:
3332:
3330:
3327:every time.
3323:
3305:
3289:
3272:
3227:
3204:recent death
3175:
3154:
3116:
3079:
3046:recent death
2993:recent death
2972:
2952:
2935:
2900:
2879:
2875:
2855:
2838:
2823:
2806:Strong merge
2805:
2776:today's date
2775:
2770:
2737:
2719:
2707:
2703:
2686:
2681:
2660:
2635:
2599:
2591:
2560:
2549:Hone Tuwhare
2521:
2513:
2495:
2445:
2426:
2419:
2408:
2401:
2391:
2385:
2379:
2373:
2355:
2350:
2348:
2336:
2333:
2310:
2307:
2282:
2262:included in
2258:
2228:
2199:yancy+butler
2194:Yancy Butler
1505:Genital wart
1001:
984:
946:
929:
918:
893:
887:
870:
816:
803:WhatamIdoing
792:
788:
771:
714:
697:
679:
669:
646:
580:
540:
537:
533:
532:
492:
486:
485:
463:
462:
437:
429:
415:
390:
377:
376:
364:Arthur Rubin
355:
338:
318:
278:
258:
253:
249:
245:
241:
220:
216:
199:
177:
175:
165:
159:
153:
147:
129:
123:
117:
111:
93:
88:
86:
74:
71:
58:
4948:Woohookitty
4940:Woohookitty
4912:and at the
4729:Nepaheshgar
4617:Urdu poetry
4537:Nepaheshgar
4458:Nepaheshgar
4422:Nepaheshgar
4390:@123, i.e.
4346:Tundrabuggy
4328:Nepaheshgar
4283:Tundrabuggy
4234:Nepaheshgar
4213:Flowerparty
4195:Nepaheshgar
4106:Woohookitty
4038:Strong Keep
3979:—Preceding
3972:Iamawesome
3932:Steve Irwin
3777:Strong keep
3733:) has made
3621:Strong Keep
3600:Strong Keep
3510:Jon Dowland
3479:Strong keep
3298:Quicksilver
3290:Strong keep
3025:Flowerparty
2953:Strong keep
2936:Strong keep
2864:OwenBlacker
2856:Strong keep
2771:Strong keep
2738:Strong keep
2720:Strong keep
2712:Flowerparty
2665:a look here
2356:Woohookitty
2233:—Preceding
1472:Fishkeeping
1467:Fishkeeping
1390:Dodge SRT-4
1128:Alexithymia
1089:Alexithymia
1035:total hits
789:Delete both
772:Delete Both
378:Strong keep
94:Woohookitty
89:delete both
4885:anyway. —
4507:under the
3967:Cory Lidle
3847:Yellowdesk
3612:(contribs)
3591:Black Kite
3266:contradict
3193:complement
3176:talk pages
3018:persondata
2868:Discussion
2843:Gianluca91
2724:Sugarcubez
2492:Cory Lidle
2484:Cory Lidle
2450:Cory Lidle
2298:Wrathchild
1038:othr hits
1020:subj cats
698:Disclosure
223:links, or
55:November 4
43:November 5
38:November 3
4831:deletion.
4511:section.
4008:SqueakBox
3996:SqueakBox
3946:Mattinbgn
3711:Withdrawn
3551:JBsupreme
3528:Brent Dax
3428:faithless
3211:Pixelface
3099:Pixelface
3000:Pixelface
2742:Cosprings
1395:dodge+srt
439:roguegeek
392:roguegeek
246:guideline
5013:Garion96
4996:Terraxos
4877:subpages
4145:subpages
4025:Tezkag72
3809:change.
3781:John Doe
3761:user:j
3396:Spitfire
3375:Reywas92
3311:Terraxos
3151:Grutness
2973:contents
2963:and the
2940:Dravecky
2917:contribs
2876:Commment
2828:Garion96
2791:contribs
2669:Unschool
2596:Grutness
2557:Grutness
2518:Grutness
2458:Alansohn
2395:subpages
2259:Comment:
2247:contribs
2235:unsigned
2046:Solihull
2041:Solihull
1204:lobbying
1014:Article
989:Garion96
933:contribs
759:ReyBrujo
682:Dmoz3.--
601:Web chat
572:Web chat
221:category
204:Terraxos
184:item 9.
169:subpages
133:subpages
20: |
4859:history
4773:E104421
4530:comment
4403:comment
4361:Comment
4316:comment
4275:Kurdish
4263:Yiddish
4247:Comment
4222:Comment
4127:history
3981:undated
3939:current
3884:Comment
3840:current
3791:. They
3680:Hapsala
3641:Splette
3544:Current
3333:BQZip01
3294:davidwr
3256:cleanup
3245:current
3235:current
3117:editors
3055:" and "
2906:davidwr
2882:Lugnuts
2860:davidwr
2858:as per
2780:davidwr
2689:Lugnuts
2642:) then
2423:edited.
2377:history
1433:est (1)
1002:Comment
894:Comment
875:Tschild
871:suggest
817:Abstain
795:WP:ELNO
715:Comment
647:Comment
516:Wrs1864
501:Wrs1864
473:Wrs1864
360:WP:ELNO
339:Comment
283:WP:ELNO
279:Comment
217:Comment
182:WP:ELNO
151:history
115:history
5016:(talk)
5009:Delete
4984:purely
4980:Delete
4959:Delete
4896:Keepys
4768:delete
4710:ChrisO
4652:Jayjg
4592:. Per
4509:Gorani
4481:Delete
4440:ChrisO
4364:WP:WAX
4301:ChrisO
4297:Delete
4271:Ladino
4267:Hebrew
4209:Delete
3927:Delete
3914:Shanes
3909:Delete
3901:(talk)
3833:Delete
3697:Rusty8
3693:Delete
3636:Delete
3564:Delete
3537:Delete
3502:Delete
3462:Delete
3280:Talk
3080:anyway
2921:e-mail
2831:(talk)
2824:Delete
2795:e-mail
2708:always
2704:Delete
2682:Delete
2661:Delete
2636:Delete
2283:Delete
2268:Orlady
2008:riddim
2003:Riddim
1915:10000
1912:10000
1242:chakra
1237:Chakra
1172:Batman
1167:Batman
1041:notes
992:(talk)
985:Delete
972:GRuban
959:Batman
947:Delete
732:google
684:Orlady
680:Delete
674:added
672:boldly
626:Orlady
605:Orlady
597:Cancún
589:Batman
563:Batman
559:Cancún
541:Delete
489:Delete
416:Delete
388:first.
367:(talk)
200:Delete
178:search
4970:Help!
4644:types
4162:Help!
3845:. --
3666:broil
3661:Royal
3605:David
3569:luuva
3492:edits
3445:Keep.
3390:Keep.
3345:Keep.
3133:Conti
2754:Why?
2614:Conti
2578:Conti
2574:These
2536:Conti
2500:Conti
2433:Conti
2418:from
2266:). --
2239:Qazin
1893:topix
1625:ipsec
1620:IPsec
1029:hits
1023:hits
923:Ckatz
902:Qazin
864:dmoz3
854:dmoz2
844:dmoz3
834:dmoz2
752:dmoz3
742:dmoz2
702:Qazin
655:Qazin
555:WP:EL
497:WP:EL
468:WP:EL
386:WP:EL
382:WP:EL
343:Qazin
287:Qazin
255:Ckatz
229:Qazin
186:Qazin
46:: -->
16:<
5000:talk
4871:logs
4853:talk
4777:talk
4759:talk
4748:Keep
4733:talk
4714:talk
4706:this
4688:talk
4660:Keep
4590:Keep
4573:talk
4555:and
4541:talk
4517:talk
4491:and
4462:talk
4444:talk
4426:talk
4375:Thin
4350:talk
4341:Keep
4332:talk
4305:talk
4287:talk
4238:talk
4199:talk
4172:keep
4139:logs
4121:talk
4047:talk
4029:talk
4021:Keep
4004:Keep
3992:Keep
3955:Keep
3918:talk
3891:prod
3866:Grsz
3860:Keep
3851:talk
3807:will
3793:must
3745:talk
3741:WWGB
3731:talk
3721:talk
3701:talk
3684:talk
3676:Keep
3651:Keep
3585:Keep
3575:talk
3555:talk
3514:talk
3488:talk
3470:talk
3453:talk
3421:Keep
3408:Talk
3357:talk
3324:Keep
3315:talk
3306:Keep
3261:and
3228:Keep
3215:talk
3187:and
3157:wha?
3103:talk
3074:and
3066:and
3004:talk
2980:and
2959:and
2944:talk
2913:talk
2888:talk
2847:talk
2839:Keep
2815:talk
2787:talk
2760:talk
2756:WWGB
2746:talk
2728:talk
2695:talk
2673:talk
2652:talk
2648:WWGB
2602:wha?
2592:year
2563:wha?
2524:wha?
2514:Keep
2496:does
2462:talk
2452:and
2446:Keep
2389:logs
2371:talk
2351:keep
2290:dmoz
2272:talk
2243:talk
2145:189
2142:262
2123:vrml
2118:VRML
2065:148
1571:120
1568:179
1302:349
1299:432
1264:142
1261:197
1226:339
1223:450
1220:111
1011:Ref
976:talk
927:talk
921:per
919:Keep
906:talk
879:talk
859:and
839:and
824:dmoz
807:talk
780:talk
776:2005
763:talk
747:and
722:dmoz
706:talk
688:talk
659:talk
630:talk
609:talk
599:and
520:talk
505:talk
487:Weak
477:talk
464:Keep
449:cont
445:talk
436:#9.
423:dmoz
402:cont
398:talk
356:Keep
347:talk
328:talk
319:Keep
306:talk
302:2005
291:talk
242:Keep
233:talk
208:talk
190:talk
163:logs
145:talk
127:logs
109:talk
35:<
4964:Guy
4910:IRC
4753:.--
4648:all
4380:boy
4366:to
4156:Guy
4012:мѕğ
3975:800
3965:or
3627:日本穣
3624:···
3504:--
3296:. —
3170:of
3153:...
2967:of
2919:)/(
2915:)/(
2793:)/(
2789:)/(
2598:...
2559:...
2520:...
2218:12
2215:12
2206:12
2190:31
2180:23
2177:17
2174:13
2161:x3d
2156:X3D
2152:30
2139:73
2136:12
2130:61
2114:29
2103:56
2100:53
2091:48
2075:28
2068:88
2062:60
2053:60
2037:27
2027:12
1999:26
1992:76
1989:85
1961:25
1923:24
1884:23
1874:13
1871:12
1868:12
1846:22
1807:21
1800:19
1797:46
1794:27
1785:22
1769:20
1762:34
1759:40
1731:19
1721:18
1718:16
1709:15
1693:18
1654:17
1647:28
1644:54
1641:26
1638:26
1616:16
1606:17
1603:10
1578:15
1565:59
1562:59
1540:14
1529:12
1501:13
1491:34
1488:30
1485:30
1463:12
1424:11
1386:10
1376:13
1373:10
1337:13
1334:13
1331:13
1296:83
1293:80
1258:55
1255:55
1217:21
1211:90
935:).
264:spy
22:Log
5002:)
4945:--
4779:)
4761:)
4735:)
4727:--
4716:)
4690:)
4680:}}
4674:{{
4670:}}
4664:{{
4640:}}
4634:{{
4632:,
4630:}}
4624:{{
4622:,
4620:}}
4614:{{
4612:,
4610:}}
4604:{{
4602:,
4600:}}
4594:{{
4575:)
4543:)
4519:)
4464:)
4446:)
4428:)
4420:--
4411:],
4385:00
4352:)
4334:)
4307:)
4289:)
4269:,
4265:,
4240:)
4201:)
4103:--
4049:)
4031:)
4014:)
3948:\
3942:}}
3936:{{
3920:)
3894:}}
3888:{{
3853:)
3843:}}
3837:{{
3813:TN
3803:}}
3797:{{
3747:)
3725:—
3703:)
3686:)
3643::)
3557:)
3547:}}
3541:{{
3516:)
3490:•
3472:)
3455:)
3435:()
3410:)
3401:19
3359:)
3331:—
3317:)
3269:}}
3263:{{
3259:}}
3253:{{
3248:}}
3242:{{
3238:}}
3232:{{
3217:)
3207:}}
3201:{{
3105:)
3049:}}
3043:{{
3021:}}
3015:{{
3006:)
2996:}}
2990:{{
2946:)
2890:)
2866:|
2862:—
2849:)
2817:)
2809:--
2762:)
2748:)
2730:)
2697:)
2675:)
2654:)
2612:--
2464:)
2420:85
2409:if
2353:--
2293:}}
2287:{{
2274:)
2249:)
2245:•
2221:0
2212:0
2209:0
2203:1
2183:6
2171:4
2168:4
2165:1
2133:1
2127:4
2109:1
2106:3
2097:5
2094:2
2088:3
2059:0
2056:0
2050:5
2030:6
2024:6
2021:5
2018:4
2015:1
2012:1
1986:9
1983:9
1980:5
1977:0
1974:0
1954:0
1951:2
1948:2
1945:2
1942:2
1939:0
1936:0
1918:5
1909:9
1906:9
1903:5
1900:0
1897:0
1877:1
1865:5
1862:0
1859:0
1841:3
1838:0
1835:1
1832:1
1829:1
1826:1
1823:0
1820:0
1791:5
1788:4
1782:1
1756:6
1753:6
1750:5
1747:0
1744:0
1724:2
1715:1
1712:1
1706:4
1688:3
1685:0
1682:1
1679:1
1676:0
1673:0
1670:1
1667:1
1635:5
1632:0
1629:0
1609:7
1600:5
1597:4
1594:5
1591:1
1559:5
1556:0
1553:0
1535:2
1532:3
1526:9
1523:9
1520:4
1517:0
1514:1
1494:4
1482:5
1479:0
1476:0
1458:1
1455:0
1452:3
1449:3
1446:3
1443:1
1440:0
1437:0
1417:0
1414:4
1411:4
1408:4
1405:3
1402:0
1399:0
1379:3
1370:5
1367:4
1364:5
1361:1
1348:9
1343:1
1340:0
1328:1
1325:0
1322:0
1309:8
1290:5
1287:3
1284:2
1271:7
1252:5
1249:0
1246:0
1233:6
1214:3
1208:2
1195:5
1190:7
1163:4
1158:4
1155:0
1152:1
1149:1
1146:1
1143:1
1140:0
1137:0
1124:3
1119:4
1116:0
1113:1
1110:1
1107:1
1104:1
1101:0
1098:0
1085:2
1080:3
1077:0
1074:2
1071:2
1068:2
1065:2
1062:0
1059:0
1046:1
978:)
908:)
881:)
867:}}
861:{{
857:}}
851:{{
847:}}
841:{{
837:}}
831:{{
827:}}
821:{{
809:)
782:)
765:)
755:}}
749:{{
745:}}
739:{{
735:}}
729:{{
725:}}
719:{{
708:)
690:)
661:)
632:)
624:--
611:)
578:.
522:)
507:)
479:)
426:}}
420:{{
349:)
330:)
324:ww
308:)
293:)
235:)
210:)
192:)
91:--
4998:(
4972:)
4968:(
4879:)
4874:·
4868:·
4862:·
4856:·
4851:(
4775:(
4757:(
4731:(
4712:(
4686:(
4571:(
4539:(
4515:(
4460:(
4442:(
4424:(
4414:,
4348:(
4330:(
4321:,
4303:(
4285:(
4236:(
4197:(
4164:)
4160:(
4147:)
4142:·
4136:·
4130:·
4124:·
4119:(
4045:(
4027:(
3987:.
3930:(
3916:(
3849:(
3816:P
3743:(
3729:(
3719:(
3699:(
3682:(
3577:)
3573:(
3553:(
3512:(
3494:)
3486:(
3468:(
3451:(
3406:(
3355:(
3335:—
3313:(
3213:(
3137:✉
3135:|
3101:(
3002:(
2942:(
2923:)
2911:(
2908:/
2886:(
2845:(
2813:(
2797:)
2785:(
2782:/
2758:(
2744:(
2736:'
2726:(
2693:(
2671:(
2650:(
2618:✉
2616:|
2582:✉
2580:|
2540:✉
2538:|
2504:✉
2502:|
2460:(
2437:✉
2435:|
2397:)
2392:·
2386:·
2380:·
2374:·
2369:(
2270:(
2241:(
974:(
930:·
925:(
904:(
877:(
805:(
778:(
761:(
704:(
686:(
657:(
628:(
607:(
518:(
503:(
493:2
475:(
451:)
447:·
443:(
404:)
400:·
396:(
345:(
326:(
304:(
289:(
231:(
206:(
188:(
171:)
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:)
130:·
124:·
118:·
112:·
107:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.