Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse/Questions/Archive 687

1108:. You are correct that the standards for fair use on the English Knowledge (XXG) are more restrictive than the letter of the law itself. This is by design, and likely partly due to the fact that we are the highest profile non-profit website in the world by a wide margin, and almost certainly use more fair use content than anyone else by a wide margin as well. Part of this is also due to the desire to make our content free for everyone, which tends to run counter to fair use, and can be frustrating for others who attempt to reuse content from Knowledge (XXG) elsewhere. At the same time, we are quite a bit more permissive than other Wikimedia Foundation projects, like Wikimedia Commons or the German Knowledge (XXG), which do not allow non-free content at all, or the French Knowledge (XXG), which only allows non-free content in exceptionally limited circumstances, like logos of companies and depictions of currencies. 132:. Welcome to the Teahouse. I hope we can help you. First of all, can you tell me if the picture you want to add to a page is one that, either a) you took yourself and therefore you own the copyright?, or b) is a picture you have already located either on Wikimedia Commons or somewhere where it is absolutely clear the photographer has authorised it is free to use - even commercially? You'll see this because there will a wording something like 'Creative Commons licence' by it. I ask this question first, because we do not allow any old image found on the internet to be used on Knowledge (XXG). Looking forward to hearing back from you. Regards from the UK, 650:(edit conflict) If you open an account, you will be autoconfirmed in four days and ten edits, which is easy for you. As I said above, if you mention this IP address on your new user page, then any administrator evaluating your request for any other user permissions can take your IP edits into account, if they feel that they are relevant. As far as I know, there is no way to otherwise link your IP edits to a new account. Editors with better technical skills than I may correct me. I believe that there are many benefits to having an account, but that is optional and the choice is yours. 850:

ask myself "Were they right? Did I really make it worse?" If I did (and it does happen), I might even show I accepted they were right by going to the edit history on the page in question and hitting the blue (thank) link which sends a little "thank you" message to that editor. (It's my way of saying sorry, you were right) Of course, I might actually be cross and tempted for a moment to hit the blue (undo) link and revert their reversion - but that only starts off what we call an "edit war" which we all need to avoid getting into. (You can read more on that

855:

in a way that sounds polite, neutral and not antagonistic is never the easiest thing to do in type-written text, but this is how best to start a discussion. Do it calmly and politely and it should lead to a consensus on the best way to improve an article. Many times it can be best just to shrug one's shoulders and not worry about the fact that there is always more than one way to phrase something, so moving on to the next task can often be best way. Does any of this help? Regards from the UK,

998:, a tutorial structured as a game, before attempting to create a new article. Please understand that successfully creating a new article is one of the hardest things to do on Knowledge (XXG); it takes time and practice. New users who dive right in to article creation often end up disappointed and with hurt feelings over the process; those users who are most successful at article creation started small by making edits to existing articles, to better learn the ropes. I hope this helps you. 2602:

cannot see a way that now changing your mind over its licencing would result in the image's removal from Wikimedia Commons and thus Knowledge (XXG). Either way, once an image has been released, other third parties are also still free to use it under that original licence, in perpetuity - whether taken from your Flickr site back then, or from Wiki Commons, or indeed anywhere else. Sorry I cannot be of more assistance or comfort to you. Regards from the UK,

35: 922:

Equally, I can see other editors are making changes in a positive spirit, too, and I liked some of your edits and rationales better, but some of the minor changes and explanations others made were justifiable and preferable, too. So, there I think you all seem to be working relatively cooperatively, notwithstanding the minor differences of opinion on wording and content. I suspect you are aware of the

3171: 1736:

say about them: it is really only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject have published about them. The very fact that your organisation have asked you to write an article about them suggests that they are under the (very common) misapprehension that a Knowledge (XXG) article about them in any sense belongs to them. --

744:, and almost impossible to do. How likely am I to write about myself in a neutral, independent manner? Could I prove all the wonderful things I would want to say about myself, using only stuff that newspapers, TV and books have said about me? (My own website would be excluded as it's not seen as independent.) We call this a ' 2269:. If you cannot get outside participation, then it defaults to no inclusion. Sometimes that happens (usually on niche topics where specialized expertise is needed to fully grasp the subject), but considering the article you propose to edit, I am fairly sure you would have a dozen of comments within a week of opening an RfC. 3394:" subjects, which does not mean "worthy of interest" in Knowledge (XXG) parlance, but "have been the subject of in-depth independent coverage in reliable sources". Your proposed article may therefore not qualify. I cannot tell if that is a problem or not (deleted pages can only be seen by administrators). You may find 495:

covered similarly by the Boston Globe and Discover Magazine. I feel this person is attempting to take the contribution hostage because it does not conform to his/her point of view? What is the best way to address this issue? I am an expert on this topic in academia and am less familiar with my paths to recourse here.

411:

Since I have a Conflict of Interest for this page, I am not able to remove the alert boxes myself. I am still fairly new to Knowledge (XXG) and the process so I would like advice on the next steps we should complete to request that these 2 alert boxes be removed. Any suggestions you have would be much appreciated.

165:, I must tell you that there are much much much more urgent issues than getting a picture. As it stands that article is likely to be deleted, because it has almost no references (the cited page on Soccerway has very little information about him personally) and consequently does not establish that he is 2248:

It is not a matter of time. If someone had drive-by reverted you, and refused to engage on talk or elsewhere, you would be justified in re-reverting after (IMO) about a week (give or take, depending how much the article is watched, the inclusion controversial, the other editor active, etc.). But I do

1882:

Hello anon. That is a strange error and I'm not sure I've seen it myself. You may want to try restarting your browser, your machine, or clearing your browsing data, and see if any of those help the problem. In the worst case scenario, if you are absolutely not able to create an account, you can still

1345:

It would be best to upload to WikiCommons. When logged-in click contributions at the top of any page, then 'uploads' (just under the main heading), then WikiCommons in the first line. Once at commons click 'upload file' on the left. The upload wizard will take you through the steps to upload and the

854:

if you wish.) So, what I'd recommend doing if you really feel your version was a genuine improvement is going to that editor's talk page and adding a new topic, politely inviting them to explain why they felt the original version was better, and what it was that made them undo your change. Doing this

2641:

Read again what you were told above. You released it under an irrevocable licence, and this was confirmed when the photo was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Any changes which you subsequently made at Flickr do not affect the use of the photo under the licence conditions under which it was released.

2591:

article since April 2016, and that your attempts have been reverted each time. This must be very frustrating for you. Your image appears to have been legitimately obtained from your Flickr account when you clearly licenced it (essentially for non-commercial and commercial use, in perpetuity) subject

1113:

There are probably a lot of people who get into trouble on Knowledge (XXG) primarily for fundamentally misunderstanding Knowledge (XXG) policies and applying a different standard that might apply elsewhere, but doesn't necessarily apply here. But it's important to understand that if someone left you

2344:

The New Page review is quite backlogged right now; it's not uncommon for a review to take more than a month. I may be wrong, but I don't think there's a way to speed it up very much; reviewing an article takes time, and I presume most new page creators would be in a similar state of mind as you. If

2252:

From what I see, another editor has expressed their opposition to your proposed changes (multiple times) with arguments that are not obviously trolling or disruptive. If you repost a similar request, they are under no obligation to address it, and their previous opposition still stands, pretty much

849:

Hi there IP user. Welcome. You ask a very good question, and at times it can seem almost like a personal insult when someone abruptly reverts an edit you have made in all good faith to an article. (It happens to every single one of us). But try not to look at it like that. The first thing I'd do is

410:

We are working on updates to the "John Langeloth Loeb Jr." Knowledge (XXG) page. Currently we have two alert boxes: "like resume" and "BLP unsourced section" on the page. Since these alert boxes were posted we have made several updates to the text and format of the page and have added 40 citations.

3386:

and follow its instructions. There are basically two reasons for the procedures outlined there: we need some proof that the original holder of copyright does consent to its use (not just "someone with unconfirmed identity told us so over the internet"), and that they are aware that release under a

2873:

Thank both of you. I think I understand the issue. The point is that Facebook uses the redirect page for displaying my profile, therefore it says "my name" "blablabla" "studied at the London School of Economics and SOCIAL Science", which is wrong and annoying. I am going to try the "embedded file"

2801:

You are correct about the title, of course, but the LSE is also strong on social sciences, and we can't stop people searching with the wrong title, so we try to help by redirecting them to the correct title. Facebook also has a similar redirect for those who search under the wrong title. Everyone

2620:

Actually I changed the license on it two years ago. It's now under copyright all rights reserved. I want it taken down because i never intended it to be shared and the people in the photo probably would not like it either. Now the photo is changed to a different attribute, cannot be downloaded. IT

2000:

My complaint is that the information concerning my edits creating and editing this article is lost. Rather, the content of the article titled Siege of the Legations, Beijing 1900, some 32,000 bytes, was merged and/or re-titled and the creators and editors of those 32,000 bytes are not credited in

1735:

interested in information that has already been published in a reliable source (one with a reputation for editorial control and fact checking). Furthermore, Knowledge (XXG) has very little interest in what a subject says about themselves, or what their friends, relatives, associates, or employees,

1444:

Assuming the video is your own copyright (and contains no copyrighted music etc) I'm afraid you will still probably need to convert your video into a file format acceptable for uploading to Wikimedia Commons. (MPEGs and AVI are popular formats NOT licenced for free use, so must be converted into a

1286:

We like to handle things transparently here; if you had posted with your original account and pointed to the real incident, we could have given more specific advice right away. Yes, it may mean that the people you complain about will find what you say, but that is a feature, not a bug. If you have

1018:

I am having a problem which i stated on 24 October but it is not yet resolved. EYorkshire(32) st Angelia-This is the name of a place in the document "List of UK Parliamentary constituencies (1801–32)". I need to know whether that name is correct or not. If not,please give the correct name(couldn't

2046:

Text and/or other creative content from Siege of the Legations, Beijing 1900 was copied or moved into Siege of Beijing Legation Quarter with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter

931:

to seek an independent review of the issues involved. (I'm definitely not urging you to lodge any complaints over the Red Dragon page - things there look fine at present, but this is the system in place where matters of real concern can be raised, if necessary.) Hoping this helps, and keep up the

926:

which stops tit-for-tat edit-warring, and can lead to a formal complaint and blocking of one or more editors for a period of time? You want to avoid getting into that, but would I walk away? Sometimes yes, where it doesn't really matter or impact on the quality of the article. But at other times,

752:

to understand why writing about yourself is frowned upon. If you honestly feel you are so noteworthy that Knowledge (XXG) needs a page about you, I'd still suggest you leave it to other editors to do, and your role could be simply to highlight where they can find independent sources to base their

232:

Hey Eddie, thanks for your question. I think what you've suggested is just fine. Sometimes authors or others offer downloadable copies of articles on personal or professional websites; I generally avoid linking to these sites in general because they can go down at anytime, whereas the information

2601:

says above (and knowing that the default setting on Flickr accounts is for 'all rights reserved'), you obviously did back then intend the image to be used and freely available by anyone, forever - for which I'm sure we are all very grateful to you. (It is a nice photograph, by the way). I really

2888:

OK, I understood what happened: the wrong LSE & Social Science was on Facebook (unofficial page), not on Knowledge (XXG). I just had to change my profile with a new entry to the correct LSE page, then delete the wrong entry. Sorry about all this. Should I delete this whole message, as it is

2596:

Creative Commons licence. I also note that an administrator specifically checked the licencing and confirmed it was correct, and that you did release it. As such, the image was wholly acceptable for placing on Wikimedia Commons. I can imagine how irksome this is for you, because you now want to

571:

connection between your new account and your previous IP editing. But you can certainly place a note on your new user page that mentions your previous edits under specific IP addresses. Any editor evaluating your overall contributions to the encyclopedia can consider those edits as well. If you

921:

That's a difficult one to answer, because it depends on the precise situation. I've looked at the recent revisions of the Red Dragon film you mention, and it's clear you've taken absolutely the right path in discussing things in a non-confrontational way on the Talk Page or via edit summaries.

612:

It does seem a pity to "throw away" six months of edits, but it is still worth creating an account, and you can link your IP contributions on your user page as suggested above if you don't mind people knowing your IP address. In any assessment of your contributions, these IP edits can then be

494:

Hi, I have published an article in a peer-reviewed journal on digital goods. I added a summary of this work to the page and it was removed by SPECIFICO, who is threatening to ban me from WIkipedia. I am an expert on this topic, the article was published in a reputable academic journal, and was

3347:

Yesterday I wanted to submit an article about a musical instrument of my father. However, the text in the article is directly from his own website so due to copyright issues the site was deleted right after I tried to upload it. Afterwards, he gave me permission to upload the article from his

1945:, is that editors should not directly edit articles on subjects that they have a personal or professional connection with. That would certainly include the article on your employer (paid or otherwise). After all, who would trust an encyclopaedia where the subjects write articles on themselves? 1278:

If you think the warning you were given was incorrect, you should first try to contact whoever left it to you to have clarification both ways (they may explain to you why they left it, or they might realize they warned you incorrectly). If this fails, you may complain about user conduct at

1153:

I'll start with your last question. Most competent editors are here to improve Knowledge (XXG). This involves improving existing articles when they are, or could be, acceptable; and getting rid of them when they aren't. The usual reason for treating an article as unacceptable is lack of

2514:

this photo is no longer useable! I have switched the rights on it and so any and all uploads of it has to be removed! IT is no longer under creative commons and I can sue anyone that is using it without my consent! I own all rights to that photo and you will need to remove it asap

597:

for my edits, does that mean the past 500+ edits cant't be used to count for me? Like, if I want access to protected sites or if I wanted to expand my role in Knowledge (XXG)? (Sorry it took me some time to respond. Trying to figure out what to do with this cake I just bought...).

2586:

Hello Sara. I can see that you have been frustrated by the continued use of an image that two years ago you made freely available under a Creative Commons licence, but have now changed your mind about. I also recognise that you have repeatedly tried to remove this image from the

514:. You are running into a problem that faces many experts who edit here. Knowledge (XXG) policies are responsible for the removal of the material. As an encyclopedia Knowledge (XXG) summarizes what has already been written and analyzed elsewhere, so a section such as you added to 2949:(151,831 articles) - These are articles that link to sites online where the sites themselves have gone down or changed names, and the links in the references need to be repaired. This is usually done by trying to find an archived version so that content in the references can be 1161:

If an editor finds that someone has been violating Knowledge (XXG)'s policies on copyright, it is reasonable of them to check that person's other edits to see if those also violate policy. Someone who continues to violate policy after multiple warnings is likely to be blocked.

2198:

I have no opinion about the bottom of the dispute. I will simply note that (1) if someone asks that you leave their user talk page alone, it is courteous to do so, no matter how poorly they behave themselves; (2) when two editors disagree about the inclusion of some content,

1801:

As it relates to a series of novels, should it have novels/series as the final word in the title? Could you please let me know if there is a convention around this? As in, are all wikipedia articles for novels meant to have those words, or simply be the title of the series?

2802:

ends up at the correct page, so why is this a problem? If the mistake is in your Facebook profile, then you need to contact them to make the change, or just change it yourself. I can't replicate the problem because when I add LSE to a Facebook profile it comes up with

438:

which requires entries on your talk page and the talk page of the article. You have made a start at this but you have not finished all the requirements. Who or what entity is paying? Who is "We" in your paragraph above? .... accounts are supposed to be a single

209:

is available on the author's page at a university's website. Would it be acceptable to cite the journal (name, volume, date, pages, etc.) and use the URL of the full text in the citation, even though I did not get the material directly from the journal's website?

2284:

page because that page is so large, it does not allow for detailed information. I thought that by putting it into the page for the city where there was already a small bit, it would be a simple and easy fix; but I was wrong. I will take your advice and thanks

2345:

there was a process to submit it to the "front of the line", it would be too easy to abuse the process. Two things. though; first, your article is not submitted for review and will not be reviewed if you do not submit it. Second, in the state it is in, it will

551:

What would happen to my prior edits if I was to create a account. Would they change to my account name? Would I still be credited? Would I get a surprise party? Piece of cake? A platitude? No really, I would hope I still get credited. Thank you for your time.

2973:(136,302 articles) - These are articles where no other Knowledge (XXG) articles link to them, and also need to be incorporated better into the encyclopedia, but in the opposite way of the previous category. For more information on fixing these articles see 927:

assuming Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines are being constantly flaunted by another editor, I'd continue to raise this with them on their Talk Page until, if it got really unreasonable and I had cause to lodge a formal complaint, I would go to the

3090:. However, I strongly recommend that you do not take the time to do that because the tone of the text is still unsuitable for Knowledge (XXG). The text in the Facebook page (which I assume is identical to the text in the deleted page is written far too 3059:

This page has been deleted. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. • 16:22, 2 November 2017 Primefac (talk | contribs) deleted page Syed Hasan Askari (G11, G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of

1196:

Not arbitrary, certainly not in this case. The user who reverted the edit knows more about copyright violations than most of the rest of us put together, and has taken the time to explain why your edits were reverted. You'll find the explanation

2162:

If no one engages on the Talk page, how long should a question of a change stay open before you can reasonably make the change without being accused of edit warring and not gaining consensus? I have been trying to cut down the information on

1859:

when i make a account i get the error There seems to be a problem with your login session; this action has been canceled as a precaution against session hijacking. Go back to the previous page, reload that page and then try again. on chrome

2328:

The New Article Wizard states that once a new article is submitted, "Reviews can take a long time, and are done in somewhat of a random fashion." How long do these reviews take, on average? Is there any way to accelerate this process?

3037:) which I created earlier with the help of several wikipedia editors. This page has been recently deleted due to copyright issue per the message received below. (Pls see comments below). In reality, I created the FB page of 1037:

has very few watchers, but I have replied there & pinged the editor responsible for the garbled edit in 2016. I have added a section heading before your question, as it doesn't belong in the section where you placed it.

1831:. That would only be necessary if there were two articles that might have identical names. For the sake of discussion, let's assume that a movie was made with the same name. Then what you propose may be useful. Please read 1966:

template to draw someone's attention to it quickly, if necessary. If possible, please provide references for any suggestions you have, because we can only include material that is adequately supported by reliable sources.

1640:

to submit a draft for review. If you don't have independent sources, your organization may not merit a Knowledge (XXG) article at this time. Please understand that not every organization or business merits a page here.

1064:

I created this new account so I am not stalked by this person who has threatened to block me. I notice with others, that if you argue with these people, they will go after all your edits and find a reason to block you.

2775: 727:

for an explanation of what that means.) In essence, you can't base an article about a person from their own published words about themselves - you need to rely on what independent, reliable sources have written about

1683:

Please excuse this if it is a repeat, I think my response was eaten. Thank you so much for all your help, and I do understand. Would you please let me know what makes this promotional, so I can avoid in the future.

1266:

2963:(23,260 articles) - These are articles that have too few links to other Knowledge (XXG) articles in them, and need to be better incorporated into the encyclopedia as a whole. For more information on wikilinks see 2256:

In such 1 vs. 1 situations, if neither can convince the other (whatever the reason), it defaults to not including the controversial content unless consensus for inclusion can be obtained. This is usually done via

3244:

It took me a while to figure out from various 'how to' pages that this was what I should do. But the format of my request looks different to others on the page even though I copied and pasted the request 'code'.

785:

says, I would advise anybody, new or old, not to create an article directly unless they are certain that they can do so well enough that it will survive immediate review (which requires understanding policies on

3277:, where they can be reviewed by an experienced volunteer who can offer feedback prior to publishing. You can do this by clicking the "Submit your article for review" button in the banner at the top of the draft. 2736:

The picture has been removed from the article and that is as much as we can do at Knowledge (XXG). You uploaded the image to Commons which is a separately governed project so you'll need to make your case at

530:

which explains how this is different from most scholarly publishing. We have many experts who edit successfully, though you need to be careful of the inherent conflict of interest in citing your own articles.

715:. Welcome to the Teahouse. A brand new user like yourself first needs to have been on Knowledge (XXG) for at least 4 days, and to have made at least 10 edits before they're allowed to create a new article on 157:. Unfortunately the answer to this is not simple: you have to upload the image and then use it; and you may not upload it until you have determined that the copyright status of the image is acceptable: see 3282:

However, at this point your draft will almost certainly not be accepted, because it does not include any sources to support the content of the draft, and in order to demonstrate that the subject meets our

1475:

is a brilliant free tool for converting smaller videos into WebM or .OGG format (and many others for that matter). For larger video files up to 2GB and to directly upload the converted file to Commons,

572:

happen to be in Northern California, I will personally buy you a piece of cake and praise you if you create an account and make significant positive contributions. I encourage you to do so. Good luck!

2096:←Just few minutes ago I created a page on NIdeas Creations and Productions Pvt Ltd. This is not an advertisement or any kind of promotion. This is simply production house page. you can check website. 1636:

Your sandbox is fine; however I see it has been nominated for deletion by another user. If you have independent sources that have in depth coverage of your organization itself, you may want to go to

3056:

Primefac‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪File:1. Prof Askari 05 09 2016.jpg‬". File:1. Prof Askari 05 09 2016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons

367:, The Cite journal template accepts archive-url and archive-date. Basic syntax is listed in the commonly used parameters box with the heading 'To cite an online article that has been archived' 1061:

I have been editing here for 1.5 years. Knowledge (XXG) seems really hostile and has a really narrow interpretation of fair use to the point that it stifles editors from creating new content.

2738: 1034: 2771:

The title of this page is: "London School of Economics and SOCIAL Science". This is wrong, because the correct name for the LSE is: "London School of Economics and POLITICAL Science".

2776:

https://www.google.fr/search?q=%22London+School+of+Economics+and+Social+Science%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=sP7VWd2dF6SCwgLdi4rADQ

2904:

No we don't delete questions & their answers. They will be archived in due course, but in the meantime they stay in the hope that other readers will find the answers useful. --

1177:

Thank you both for your time. I cannot find the copyright policy you both talk about. 1) It appears like the decisions of who to block and what to delete are pretty arbitrary. 2)

834:

Hi. One of my edits was recently reverted because the person said "prefer the original". I don't want to make an issue of this, but if I could ask; how would you have handled it?

468:, with whom I'm working. I am a contractor with the Collaborative, a consulting firm with headquarters in Boston. They are paying me. We have submitted an Edit Request on the 1388:

however if the image isn't yours then it will be deleted, Also I don't see any article edited under this account - Using more than one account can get you blocked, Thanks, –

2234:

no one is responding to my request? A day? A week? A month? I don't want to ram a change through just to have it deleted, so I really do want to build consensus. Thanks

1312:

how can i upload a picture of a celebrity was taken by me on wikipedia also that page was created by me and the celebrity is already satisfied and accept all what i done

1547:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. I would ask what you mean when you say you were asked to create the draft. Certain policies may be applicable in your situation. Thanks

871:

Hello, IP user. At that point, you have two choices: either decide not to continue with the matter further; or open a polite discussion on the article's talk page. If you

2943:. Welcome to Knowledge (XXG) and thanks for your interest in helping out. There's usually a way for everyone to contribute, and this is no exception. Here's a few ideas: 1426:

On the left side of the page near the top under the Wiki Globe there's some links. Under tools near the bottom of the list you'll find Upload File. Or you can go here.

2841: 2678:

3241:

I'm not yet an autoconfirmed user so I placed a technical move request (for the page Draft:BredaPhoto) on the page wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests.

3102:

criteria, for articles of "unambiguous promotion". If you would still like to create an article about the person that meets Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria, please read

2716:

Take down the photo and all problems will be resolved and I won't be bugging you about it any longer and i won't be editing the article to remove the link and photo

590:

I was being facetious but the offer of cake was very nice of you. I'm from southern BC however, with no plans to ever visit the US. Thank you for the offer though.

1446: 2845: 2457:

in your draft. This is unacceptable; I can't check most of the sources as I'm editing from a connection with a fairly strict filter (my school) but to acheive

258:

Thanks for the quick feedback. I will go ahead with that approach. I used an archiving site to create a backup of the paper, but I don't see anywhere in the

1058:

Hello I am an attorney who has not practiced copyright law, but had a law class on it in law school, and who keeps current with current US copyright law.

2281: 1914:

Hi, I am an employee of a museum with charity status in the UK. We want to edit the wiki entry for our museum and building which is currently inaccurate -

1449:

for more information, or feel free to come back with a follow-up question and I can give you some links to useful online conversion tools to get them into

1346:

licensing requirements. Once uploaded you will find a link to 'use on Wiki'. Please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you.

2518: 98: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 2946: 613:

included because it is clear that the only user of this IP address is you. After your new account is four days old and has made ten edits, it will be

2033: 1561:

OK so I see now that your draft is about the organization that you volunteer for; you will need to review the conflict of interest policy (located at

1123:

Hopefully this helps. Feel free to ask any follow up questions. This is exactly the right place to do it, and there's usually someone around to help.

2960: 2472:. When I say "in detail", I don't mean birthdays of the founders, but it has to be substantially more than a passing mention in an unrelated story. 2172:. They just delete my post and say there is no consensus. I even tried to ask them on their personal Talk page and that did not go so well either. 990:

to submit a draft for review by another editor, which can then be posted to the encyclopedia if deemed acceptable. I would first suggest reading

2774:

The point is that Facebook uses this very page for all alumni, therefore displaying a wrong university name on our profiles. Please see here:

3412:

and the references within it are not completely made-up, this is probably a notable topic. You would still need to convert the references to

1525:

Before I make my draft a real thing, I was wondering if someone would look at it and let me know if I did anything wrong. Thanks so much! :)

1068:

this person is using there own broad view on copyright to delete my edits. I looked at all the other edits they make, and they block people

3374: 197:, but I am not sure how to cite the information. "A Syndicated Show in a Network World: Frederic Ziv's Favorite Story" was published in the 1994: 1990: 1919: 1867: 524:

Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim only if that has been published by a reliable secondary source.

2597:

change the licensing terms. But I hope you can appreciate that because you willingly released your image under an irrevocable licence, as

1457:

formats, which are acceptable for use here. (WebM format is actually brilliant as file sizes end up so much smaller than MPEGs.) Regards,

1594:

Okay! Thank you so much, I was worried that would be an issue, which is why I asked before I attempted to publish outside of the sandbox.

2720: 2702: 2684: 2625: 2621:

2521: 2357:? If you do, you need to say so. Not declaring a conflict of interest violates a different Knowledge (XXG) policy. You may want to read 1705:

As I indicated, it needs independent reliable sources that indicate how the organization is notable per guidelines, please see them at

2519:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Dapper_Day_Fall_2015_all_women.jpg/1200px-Dapper_Day_Fall_2015_all_women.jpg

2142: 1918:

Someone told me that you can't be a paid employee of an organisation to edit their page on Knowledge (XXG) - is that true? Many thanks

1430: 1158:. Copyright violation shouldn't be a reason for deleting an article: the copyvio content should be removed, and the article rewritten. 907: 835: 669: 599: 553: 3262: 3007:

You could also consider contributing to a Knowledge (XXG) in a language you are more familiar with, if you are not already doing so,

2848:

to. We don't delete redirects helping our readers just because external sites may use them inapproriately, but I have tagged it with

2780:

I actually tried to correct the title of this LSE page myself, however I could not do so because it is an automatic "redirect" page.

1292: 1330: 1242:. I'll repeat what was said above. Knowledge (XXG) aims to be free to reuse, which means being very, very careful about copyright. 803: 799: 2230:

Thanks for those pages and how long should I leave the question of changes open on the Talk page before I try to make a change,

1948:

If there are errors in the museum's article, the best thing to do in your situation would be to leave a message on the article's

2494:

Deleting the entire "Products and Services" section would be a major improvement to the draft, making it look less promotional.

3395: 1884: 811: 518:

needs to have references to secondary sources that analyze already published material, not the primary papers themselves. See

170: 21: 3190:

Hi! I'm Teenager16. I'm very new to Knowledge (XXG). I want to learn how to edit things in Knowledge (XXG) please. Thank you!

2852: 2536: 2115: 1573:). Basically, third parties need to have written about your organization in order for it to merit a Knowledge (XXG) article. 952:

Short summary says it all. Where's the SEND button? I find it very difficult to understand the various procedures required.

3387:

Knowledge (XXG)-compatible license means anyone, anywhere can reuse it, not just that it will be posted on Knowledge (XXG).

2130:, I'm afraid the article read very much like an advertisment for the company, and it has been deleted under that criteria ( 2135: 1217: 806:). Because of policies such as these, writing a new article which 'sticks' is hard, and I always advise people to use the 2207:

consensus (from other editors) before it being added; (3) if participation to a discussion is lacking, you may request a

1235: 1115: 754: 1114:

a warning on your talk page, what they're really leaving you is hopefully several links to our site policies (like our

1073: 3287:. This is usually done by showing that the subject has received sustained in-depth coverage in sources that meet our 2169:, but I'm getting resistance from ONE editor and not getting much in the way of engagement on the Talk page from them 1832: 807: 527: 3098:

Knowledge (XXG) requires. Even if the text was not copyrighted, the article would still have been deleted under the

2001:

the edit summaries. I wrote most of those 32,000 bytes and I would like to see them appear in the article history.

875:

the editor who reverted it, they will probably see your posting and should come and discuss it with you. Please see

619:

I hope you don't mind, but I've added some colons to indent your reply above. Sorry I can't send you another cake.

444:

There are several section with no references. Providing citations for them (on the talk page) would help. Regards,

2970: 2924:

I want to help Knowledge (XXG), but my knowledge of English grammar is limited. What can I do to help nonetheless?

42: 2558: 1239: 1086:

Is wikipedia currently friendly to people who want to create articles or to people who want to delete articles?

983: 791: 749: 614: 3149: 500: 288: 3398:

a useful read before reposting the article. Do not hesitate to ask follow-up questions if something is unclear.

2657: 3330: 2909: 2665: 2647: 2566: 2334: 1923: 1871: 1770: 1689: 1662:

I would add that your sandbox is not immune from certain speedy deletion criteria, such as the promotional one.

1620: 1599: 1530: 1499: 1417: 1043: 895: 1709:. It isn't enough to merely tell about an organization and what it does, which is what the draft seems to do. 3061: 3258: 3072: 2724: 2706: 2688: 2629: 2525: 2307: 2290: 2239: 2181: 1247: 1186: 1094: 536: 469: 427: 3322: 3087: 2349:

be accepted. It reads in a very promotional manner, which violates an important policy of Knowledge (XXG),

2103: 1863: 1318: 787: 3309: 3227: 3160: 3145: 2996: 2929: 2484: 2439: 2373: 1901: 1434: 1137: 1024: 911: 899: 839: 701: 673: 603: 557: 511: 496: 3326: 3103: 2974: 2469: 2020: 995: 201:, which has a paywall. Since I don't have an account with Taylor & Francis Online, I can see only an 3083: 3068: 2863: 1960: 1326: 1260: 1231: 1182: 1105: 1090: 480: 416: 118: 2954: 2164: 1578: 778: 712: 697: 51: 17: 1340: 1322: 1273:. I don't think that is going to happen, but let this be a warning not to do that again in the future. 3195: 2607: 2079: 2009: 1485: 1462: 973: 961: 957: 937: 906:

revert. It's the outright "I don't like it". Do you guys just walk if you can't convince the person?

860: 766: 284: 243: 137: 3110:

to create a draft. As you appear to be affiliated with the professor, please review our policies on

3091: 2890: 2875: 2837: 2787: 2767:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=London_School_of_Economics_and_Social_Science&redirect=no

2454: 979: 519: 166: 3422: 3404: 3370: 3363: 3355: 3334: 3311: 3229: 3199: 3179: 3153: 3131: 3076: 3020: 3016: 2998: 2933: 2913: 2905: 2898: 2894: 2883: 2879: 2867: 2831: 2795: 2791: 2750: 2728: 2710: 2692: 2669: 2661: 2651: 2643: 2633: 2611: 2570: 2562: 2550: 2546: 2529: 2503: 2489: 2444: 2418: 2403: 2391: 2378: 2338: 2330: 2311: 2294: 2275: 2243: 2221: 2185: 2151: 2127: 2119: 2107: 2083: 2065: 2013: 1978: 1927: 1903: 1875: 1848: 1841: 1821: 1774: 1766: 1745: 1741: 1724: 1718: 1700: 1693: 1685: 1671: 1657: 1650: 1631: 1624: 1616: 1603: 1595: 1582: 1556: 1542: 1534: 1526: 1503: 1495: 1489: 1466: 1438: 1421: 1413: 1401: 1374: 1355: 1301: 1251: 1224: 1190: 1171: 1139: 1098: 1047: 1039: 1028: 1007: 965: 941: 915: 888: 884: 864: 843: 823: 819: 770: 705: 677: 663: 656: 645: 607: 585: 578: 561: 540: 504: 484: 453: 420: 397: 376: 347: 326: 319: 292: 271: 245: 219: 193:

As I sought information for a proposed Knowledge (XXG) article, I found a relevant article from an

182: 178: 141: 122: 3413: 3410: 3248:

I just want confirmation that my request is correctly formatted and will be picked up by someone.

2200: 1752: 1678: 1610: 1589: 1427: 1077: 3359: 3270: 3254: 3041:

therefore it is not in violation of copyright. Requesting to restore the page Syed Hasan Askari (

2581: 2303: 2286: 2235: 2193: 2177: 2111: 1817: 1351: 1243: 1148: 735: 532: 449: 202: 148: 3284: 2358: 2350: 2280:

Thank you. I don't want this to devolve into edit warring and I pulled the information for the

3416:(so that we know which source supports which statement), but otherwise it looks fairly solid. 3296: 3214: 3175:

If we can be of further assistance at the Teahouse, feel free to let us know. Happy editing! –

2983: 2499: 2473: 2428: 2385: 2362: 1973: 1888: 1220: 1198: 1167: 1124: 1118:) in the hopes that you will review them and that they will help clarify the misunderstanding. 1020: 393: 372: 343: 267: 215: 3292: 3115: 3095: 1706: 1570: 1270: 872: 795: 435: 3123: 2859: 2074:

Thanks for the information. I couldn't find the previous history of my edits. Now I can.

1953: 1937:

edit, so nobody is going to stop you from editing any page, but it's true that not everyone

1714: 1667: 1646: 1552: 1003: 476: 461: 412: 309:

is perfectly acceptable if an equal or better free reference is not available. I agree with

194: 154: 129: 114: 3383: 3291:, usually things like books, newspapers, and magazines. You may want to review guidance at 3274: 3210: 3119: 3111: 3107: 3099: 3086:. To donate copyrighted material to Knowledge (XXG), you should follow the instructions at 2424: 2354: 2262: 2212: 2131: 1942: 1731:

in what you, or I, or any other random person on the Internet, know about a subject, it is

1637: 1562: 1280: 1080:. It appears like the decisions of who to block and what to delete are pretty arbitrary. 991: 987: 928: 923: 876: 758: 745: 3206: 3191: 3008: 2940: 2925: 2746: 2603: 2399: 2075: 2039: 2005: 1949: 1481: 1458: 933: 856: 782: 762: 757:

and especially the essential guidance on what you must and must not do when writing about

465: 310: 253: 238: 133: 3288: 2466: 2258: 2208: 1566: 851: 724: 2540: 1808: 3176: 3164: 3012: 2741:. Shouting about it here won't have any effect as it is beyond anyone here's control. 2656:

You are reminded again that you are not permitted to edit here without withdrawing the

2598: 2542: 1836: 1760: 1737: 1389: 1362: 880: 815: 651: 573: 406:

Need advice on how to remove alerts from "John Langeloth Loeb Jr." Knowledge (XXG) page

333: 314: 174: 3391: 2950: 2593: 2458: 2158:

Changes to article and consensus, how long should a discussion stay open on Talk page?

1956:) explaining the problem and asking somebody else to make the change. You can use the 1155: 720: 668:

Thank you everybody for your time. I'm seeing if there's anything I can do. Have fun.

1828: 1813: 1347: 515: 445: 3325:

has been created I need help to develop content and advise on what next. Thank you.

3106:

to determine if he meets our notability criteria first. If he does, you can use the

3038: 3417: 3399: 2495: 2270: 2216: 2060: 1968: 1296: 1212: 1163: 719:

subject. As this is an encyclopaedia, every article has to be on a subject deemed '

389: 383: 368: 362: 339: 302: 263: 259: 227: 211: 162: 2300: 2170: 1519: 464:

belongs to me alone. When I said "We" I was referring to myself and my colleague,

2059:

You could always ask for a history merge, but it is very unlikely to be granted.

3053: 2807: 2175: 1710: 1663: 1642: 1574: 1565:). Regarding the draft itself, I'm not seeing any independent reliable sources ( 1548: 999: 898:. If I"M right, like everytime I, or anyone else for that matter, tries to edit 621: 158: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

986:

in order to directly create a new article. However, you should be able to use

388:, I'm glad to hear that. I will insert those parameters. Thanks for your help. 2742: 2588: 2561:

are not permitted to edit Knowledge (XXG) until such threats are withdrawn. -

2410: 2395: 1206:

Please also note that you should not use two accounts to edit in tandem. (See

1798:

A page I created some time ago, is called: Dr Pimms, Intermillennial Sleuth.

460:

Ariconte. Thanks for your guidance and questions. My Knowledge (XXG) account

206: 2964: 2167: 2019:

Yes and no. Attribution should be included, but what you are suggesting (a

3062:

https://www.facebook.com/professorsyedhasanaskari/posts/1744203005801902:2

2028:

Attribution to your (and others') edit has been provided in the usual way:

761:. I hope this helps you understand the key issues. Regards from the UK, 279:

Journal article can be written for home. I keep a journal article for the

3273:. Normally it's a good idea to send your first few articles through our 2265:, leaving a notice on a WikiProject's talk page, etc. - in a nutshell, 1522:). I have had so much fun learning everything and will be helping out. 306: 234: 3390:

Also, you should be aware that (ideally) we only have articles about "

2759:

Error on the title of the LSE redirect page: "political", not "social"

1993:. The title was later changed and/or merged into the present article 1269:

Well, by creating another account and using it to evade scrutiny, you

1454: 593:

On a more serious subject (at least for me); I have always used this

3209:. A good place to start would be taking our interactive tutorial at 3042: 3034: 1477: 2783:

So could someone please correct this wrong "Social Science" page?

2739:

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dapper Day Fall 2015 all women.jpg

1569:) that indicate how this web content meets notability guidelines ( 740:

Writing an article about yourself is full of huge pitfalls, and is

3409:

Well, actually, if the article you intended to post is similar to

2698:

I am not withdrawing it till my photo gets taken down and removed.

1283:- but be aware that frivolous complaints are not looked well upon. 567:

Welcome to the Teahouse, IP editor 50.64.119.38. There will be no

280: 1518:

Hi! I joined up because I was asked if I could create this item (

1308:

how can i upload a picture of a celebrity was taken by me on wiki

810:

to create a draft and work there. I suggest you start by reading

696:

How do you add a person to Knowledge (XXG)? Can one add oneself?

1615:

Also, is the sandbox not the appropriate place to make a draft?

1450: 1295:

by email (that incident is absolutely not one of those cases).

2054:

still has the page history, and serves to provide attribution.

617:

which means that you can make edits to semi-protected pages.

29: 3295:

to learn more about how to include references in your draft.

2763:

There is an error in the title of this Knowledge (XXG) page:

1941:

edit every page. The community's consensus, explained in the

3122:

for guidance on creating a Knowledge (XXG) article. Thanks.

2804:"The London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE" 1915: 1471:

What the heck - might as well post the useful links anyway!

2874:

option to put an image (my screen print was not accepted).

753:

writing on. To write about another person, you should read

2840:, welcome to the Teahouse. There is already a redirect at 978:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. There is currently an

2539:

is irrevocable as long as the license terms are followed

1809:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Dr_Pimms,_Intermillennial_Sleuth

1472: 723:' and to be based on reliable, third party sources. (See 2982:

Hope this helps, and again, welcome to Knowledge (XXG)!

2953:. For more information on how to repair these links see 237:

is permanent (even if the article is behind a paywall).

3033:

Kindly assist in restoring the page Syed Hasan Askari (

2766: 2173: 2097: 2051: 1207: 594: 3375:

Draft:Double Bass by Domenico Montagnana, Venice, 1747

2253:

no matter how long ago they last said they opposed it.

2203:; the one pushing for inclusion is the one who should 1035:

Talk:List of UK Parliamentary constituencies (1801–32)

1933:

Hi, Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopaedia that anyone

1291:

to handle a matter privately, you should contact the

1179:

Is there anyone that I can appeal this decision too?

1082:

Is there anyone that I can appeal this decision too?

2324:

Is it possible to accelerate the review of new page?

1520:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User:JessicaZahurak/sandbox

1765:

Thank you both. I am very glad I asked first. :) --

3384:our page about how to donate copyrighted materials 3163:. I was going to suggest you post this notice on 3039:https://www.facebook.com/professorsyedhasanaskari 2423:I apologize for my mistake. You may wish to read 1385: 1014:List of UK Parliamentary constituencies (1801–32) 2842:London School of Economics and Political Science 2858:. I don't know whether it influences Facebook. 2166:by placing the information into linked articles 2100:Please help me in this matter. Regards Mita→ 169:. Please have a look at that link, and also at 1408:How do I upload and use a video in an article? 2846:London School of Economics and Social Science 1989:Back about 2010, I created an article called 8: 3029:Request to Restore Page of Syed Hasan Askari 2427:. If you've already read it, kudos to you. 1883:request one be registered on your behalf at 2282:List of Confederate monuments and memorials 1985:Edit info lost when name of article changed 1514:Draft page in my sandbox and I am super new 894:If I'm not sure I go to the talk page like 3348:website, but how do I proceed from here? 3043:https://en.wikipedia.org/Syed_Hasan_Askari 3035:https://en.wikipedia.org/Syed_Hasan_Askari 2947:Category:Articles with dead external links 2453:Also, there seems to be a large number of 2101: 1861: 1316: 1074:Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style#Quotations 948:Can I create and upload my own Wiki entry? 3045:) at your earliest possible convenience. 2034:Talk:Siege of the International Legations 1727:, that Knowledge (XXG) is not interested 111:How do I post a picture of a footballer? 3318:Help With Draft Article :Signal Alliance 3167:'s talk page, but I see you already did 2961:Category:Articles with too few wikilinks 2537:File:Dapper_Day_Fall_2015_all_women.jpg 2201:the default result is not to include it 520:Knowledge (XXG)'s primary-source policy 205:on the company's website. However, the 189:How should I cite this journal article? 3293:our guide on referencing for beginners 3142:Responding to an email from WikiDan61 2045: 1412:What process do I have to go through? 1265: 1181:Thanks again. I need to step away. :( 929:Adminstrator noticeboard for incidents 902:, I just throw the rulebook after the 523: 472:Talk page. Thanks again for your help. 262:template to put a URL for an archive. 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1234:, for explanations of the policy see 7: 3168: 2965:Help:Link#Wikilinks (internal links) 1995:Siege of the International Legations 1991:Siege of the Legations, Beijing 1900 1916:https://en.wikipedia.org/Selly_Manor 3396:Knowledge (XXG):Your first article 2390:it is declared paid editing - see 2036:contains the attribution template 1885:Knowledge (XXG):Request an account 28: 1835:for a more complete explanation. 1791:Article titling for novel/series? 3169: 2535:The Creative Commons license on 2510:remove all uploads of this photo 2249:not think that is what happened. 1445:royalty-free format first). See 1236:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 33: 3285:notability standards for events 1833:Knowledge (XXG): Disambiguation 2844:so there is nothing to change 1315:17:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1271:did give a reason for blocking 1116:standards for non-free content 528:Knowledge (XXG):Expert editors 1: 3275:Articles for Creation project 3211:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 2267:getting outside participation 1478:this WikiMediaFoundation tool 1361:Moved reply from Help Desk. – 1240:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Copyright 996:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 338:, Thanks! I appreciate that. 305:, using a reference behind a 3423:16:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3405:16:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3364:16:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3335:15:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3312:14:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3264:14:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3230:14:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3200:14:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3180:00:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3154:21:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 3132:00:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 3077:17:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 3021:19:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2999:10:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2934:09:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2914:18:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2899:18:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2884:18:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2868:12:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 2832:10:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 2796:09:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 2751:17:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2729:17:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2711:17:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2693:17:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2680:linkhttps://flic.kr/p/yXGBxy 2670:17:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2652:17:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2634:17:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2612:00:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2571:23:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 2551:23:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 2530:23:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 2504:16:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2490:16:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2461:, a subject must be covered 2445:16:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2404:16:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2379:16:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2353:. Do you have an undeclared 2339:15:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2312:16:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2295:15:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2276:15:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2244:15:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2222:12:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2186:16:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 2152:16:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2120:16:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2084:12:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2066:12:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 2014:11:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1979:11:46, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1928:11:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1904:10:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1876:10:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1849:07:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1822:02:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1775:01:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1746:00:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1719:23:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1694:23:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1672:23:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1651:23:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1625:22:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1604:22:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1583:22:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1557:21:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1535:21:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1504:22:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1490:01:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 1467:00:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 1439:23:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 1422:22:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 1402:18:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1375:18:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1356:17:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1302:15:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1252:15:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1225:14:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1191:13:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1172:10:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1140:10:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1099:09:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1048:14:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1029:14:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 1008:14:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 966:14:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 942:13:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 916:01:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 889:00:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 865:00:27, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 844:22:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 824:09:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 771:10:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 759:biographies of living people 706:08:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 678:09:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 664:07:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 646:06:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 608:06:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 586:05:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 562:04:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 541:03:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 505:01:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 485:03:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 454:21:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 421:18:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 398:01:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 377:14:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 348:14:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 327:05:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 293:00:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 272:01:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 246:00:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC) 220:23:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC) 183:00:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 161:. However, if this is about 142:00:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 123:23:48, 31 October 2017 (UTC) 3351:Could anybody help me out? 1943:conflict of interest policy 1723:Indeed. Please understand, 1019:find in google that's why). 3441: 2971:Category:Orphaned articles 1072:. I found this policy: 526:It may be helpful to read 3373:. This seems to be about 3289:standards for reliability 2299:Did I do this correctly? 1827:Welcome to the Teahouse, 742:very strongly discouraged 3263:_Main_move_request": --> 2023:) is unlikely to happen. 2004:Is there any recourse? 748:. Please carefully read 434:You need to comply with 207:full text of the article 199:Journal of Radio Studies 107:How do I post a picture. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse 3354:Thank you in advance! 982:where a user must have 470:John Langeloth Loeb Jr. 428:John Langeloth Loeb Jr. 3052:Wikimedia Commons < 1428:Knowledge (XXG):Videos 1384:Hi, You can upload on 1289:extremely good reasons 1054:Fair use and wikipedia 781:. In addition to what 3323:Draft:Signal Alliance 2853:R from incorrect name 1855:i cant make a account 1638:Articles for Creation 1293:Arbitration Committee 988:Articles for Creation 746:conflict of interest' 46:of past discussions. 3112:conflict of interest 2355:conflict of interest 2098:http://www.nideas.in 1805:Thank you very much 984:autoconfirmed status 980:experiment under way 804:conflict of interest 800:no original research 3138:Responding to email 3118:. You can refer to 3048:Thanks in advance! 2951:verified by readers 2392:User:Cglife.bmarcus 2213:request for comment 2092:Deletion of my page 1910:Who can edit pages? 1496:The Verified Cactus 1414:The Verified Cactus 755:WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE 3129:Ping when replying 992:Your First Article 812:your first article 171:your first article 3237:Main move request 2585: 2487: 2470:secondary soruces 2442: 2376: 2122: 2106:comment added by 2052:The redirect page 1977: 1878: 1866:comment added by 1480:is rather nifty. 1377: 1334: 1321:comment added by 1223: 1152: 924:three revert rule 739: 620: 152: 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current main page 3432: 3420: 3414:inline citations 3402: 3344:Hello everyone, 3307: 3306: 3303: 3300: 3225: 3224: 3221: 3218: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3130: 2994: 2993: 2990: 2987: 2857: 2851: 2828: 2827: 2824: 2821: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2592:to the terms of 2579: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2440: 2437: 2434: 2431: 2422: 2414: 2389: 2374: 2371: 2368: 2365: 2273: 2219: 2197: 2149: 2140: 2134:). Take care, — 2063: 2043: 1971: 1965: 1959: 1954:Talk:Selly Manor 1899: 1898: 1895: 1892: 1846: 1844:Let's discuss it 1764: 1756: 1704: 1682: 1661: 1635: 1614: 1593: 1546: 1494:Thanks a bunch! 1399: 1394: 1372: 1367: 1360: 1344: 1299: 1264: 1216: 1146: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1128: 977: 750:WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY 733: 661: 659:Let's discuss it 642: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 618: 615:WP:Autoconfirmed 583: 581:Let's discuss it 462:User:mybestwords 387: 366: 337: 324: 322:Let's discuss it 313:on this matter. 257: 231: 195:academic journal 146: 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 3440: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3418: 3400: 3342: 3320: 3304: 3301: 3298: 3297: 3239: 3222: 3219: 3216: 3215: 3188: 3170: 3161:Paul E Thompson 3146:Paul E Thompson 3140: 3128: 3094:, far from the 3031: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2922: 2920:English Grammar 2855: 2849: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2809: 2761: 2557:Those who make 2512: 2480: 2477: 2474: 2455:primary sources 2435: 2432: 2429: 2416: 2408: 2383: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2361:if this is so. 2326: 2271: 2217: 2191: 2160: 2143: 2136: 2094: 2061: 2044:that generates 2037: 1987: 1963: 1957: 1912: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1889: 1857: 1842: 1793: 1758: 1750: 1698: 1676: 1655: 1629: 1608: 1587: 1540: 1516: 1410: 1395: 1390: 1368: 1363: 1338: 1310: 1297: 1258: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1056: 1016: 971: 950: 832: 694: 657: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 623: 579: 549: 512:Carey.Morewedge 497:Carey.Morewedge 492: 466:User:Conquestde 408: 381: 360: 331: 320: 285:Steven Spafford 251: 225: 191: 109: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3438: 3436: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3388: 3379: 3378: 3341: 3338: 3327:Shokoyokoto NG 3319: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3279: 3278: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3139: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3108:article wizard 3051: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3002: 3001: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2968: 2958: 2921: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2906:David Biddulph 2871: 2870: 2834: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2718: 2717: 2700: 2699: 2682: 2681: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2662:David Biddulph 2654: 2644:David Biddulph 2623: 2622: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2574: 2573: 2563:David Biddulph 2554: 2553: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2492: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2419:Cglife.bmarcus 2331:Cglife.bmarcus 2325: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2302:Thanks again. 2278: 2254: 2250: 2225: 2224: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2093: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2069: 2068: 2056: 2055: 2049: 2030: 2029: 2025: 2024: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1946: 1920:164.40.222.209 1911: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1868:71.169.165.176 1856: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1792: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1767:JessicaZahurak 1725:JessicaZahurak 1701:JessicaZahurak 1686:JessicaZahurak 1658:JessicaZahurak 1653: 1632:JessicaZahurak 1617:JessicaZahurak 1606: 1596:JessicaZahurak 1585: 1559: 1543:JessicaZahurak 1527:JessicaZahurak 1515: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1447:this help page 1409: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1284: 1275: 1274: 1255: 1254: 1228: 1227: 1203: 1202: 1175: 1174: 1159: 1143: 1142: 1120: 1119: 1110: 1109: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1040:David Biddulph 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 955: 949: 946: 945: 944: 892: 891: 868: 867: 831: 828: 827: 826: 808:Article wizard 774: 773: 730: 729: 693: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 591: 548: 545: 544: 543: 491: 488: 474: 473: 457: 456: 441: 440: 431: 430: 426:Courtesy link 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 277: 276: 275: 274: 260:"Cite journal" 190: 187: 186: 185: 144: 108: 105: 102: 101: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3437: 3424: 3421: 3415: 3411: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3403: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3339: 3337: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3317: 3313: 3310: 3308: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3271:Mikemorrell49 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3260: 3256: 3255:Mikemorrell49 3252: 3249: 3246: 3242: 3235: 3231: 3228: 3226: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3185: 3181: 3178: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3137: 3133: 3127: 3126: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3092:promotionally 3089: 3088:WP:DONATETEXT 3085: 3084:Syedahmerraza 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3069:Syedahmerraza 3065: 3063: 3057: 3054: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3028: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2995: 2981: 2976: 2972: 2969: 2966: 2962: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2942: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2886: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2854: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2833: 2830: 2829: 2805: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2777: 2772: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2758: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721:216.14.49.242 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703:216.14.49.242 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2685:216.14.49.242 2677: 2676: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2626:216.14.49.242 2619: 2618: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2600: 2595: 2590: 2583: 2582:edit conflict 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2559:legal threats 2556: 2555: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2522:216.14.49.242 2520: 2516: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2483: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2446: 2443: 2438: 2426: 2420: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2387: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2377: 2372: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2323: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2304:C. W. Gilmore 2301: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287:C. W. Gilmore 2283: 2279: 2277: 2274: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236:C. W. Gilmore 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2214: 2210: 2209:third opinion 2206: 2202: 2195: 2194:C. W. Gilmore 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178:C. W. Gilmore 2176: 2174: 2171: 2168: 2165: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2147: 2141: 2139: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2099: 2091: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2067: 2064: 2058: 2057: 2053: 2050: 2048: 2041: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2021:history merge 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2002: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1984: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1962: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1909: 1905: 1902: 1900: 1886: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1854: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1799: 1796: 1790: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1762: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1702: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1680: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1659: 1654: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1639: 1633: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1612: 1607: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1591: 1586: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1544: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1523: 1521: 1513: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1393: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1366: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1300: 1294: 1290: 1285: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1262: 1261:Lowlowprofile 1257: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244:StarryGrandma 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232:Lowlowprofile 1230: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1219: 1218:contributions 1215: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183:Lowlowprofile 1180: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1157: 1150: 1149:edit conflict 1145: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1106:Lowlowprofile 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091:Lowlowprofile 1087: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 975: 970: 969: 968: 967: 963: 959: 953: 947: 943: 939: 935: 930: 925: 920: 919: 918: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 866: 862: 858: 853: 848: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 802:and possibly 801: 797: 793: 792:verifiability 789: 784: 780: 776: 775: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 751: 747: 743: 737: 736:edit conflict 732: 731: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 691: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 662: 660: 655: 654: 649: 648: 647: 644: 643: 616: 611: 610: 609: 605: 601: 596: 592: 589: 588: 587: 584: 582: 577: 576: 570: 566: 565: 564: 563: 559: 555: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533:StarryGrandma 529: 525: 521: 517: 516:Digital goods 513: 509: 508: 507: 506: 502: 498: 490:Digital goods 489: 487: 486: 482: 478: 471: 467: 463: 459: 458: 455: 451: 447: 443: 442: 437: 433: 432: 429: 425: 424: 423: 422: 418: 414: 405: 399: 395: 391: 385: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 364: 359: 358: 349: 345: 341: 335: 330: 329: 328: 325: 323: 318: 317: 312: 308: 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 290: 286: 282: 273: 269: 265: 261: 255: 250: 249: 247: 244: 242: 241: 236: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 213: 208: 204: 200: 196: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 150: 149:edit conflict 145: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126: 125: 124: 120: 116: 112: 106: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3353: 3350: 3346: 3343: 3321: 3253: 3250: 3247: 3243: 3240: 3236:Draft -: --> 3189: 3144: 3141: 3124: 3116:paid editing 3104:WP:NACADEMIC 3066: 3058: 3050: 3047: 3032: 2975:WP:DE-ORPHAN 2923: 2889:irrelevant? 2887: 2872: 2808: 2803: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2773: 2770: 2765: 2762: 2719: 2701: 2683: 2658:legal threat 2624: 2517: 2513: 2462: 2386:A lad insane 2346: 2327: 2266: 2231: 2204: 2161: 2145: 2144: 2137: 2102:— Preceding 2095: 2047:page exists. 2003: 1999: 1988: 1961:edit request 1938: 1934: 1913: 1862:— Preceding 1858: 1843: 1837: 1812: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1732: 1728: 1524: 1517: 1498: 1431:50.64.119.38 1425: 1416: 1411: 1396: 1391: 1369: 1364: 1317:— Preceding 1314: 1311: 1288: 1211: 1178: 1176: 1089:Thank you. 1088: 1085: 1081: 1069: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1021:Adithyak1997 1017: 956:Corrieduke. 954: 951: 908:50.64.119.38 903: 893: 836:50.64.119.38 833: 779:Afterthefire 741: 716: 713:Afterthefire 698:Afterthefire 695: 692:add a person 670:50.64.119.38 658: 652: 622: 600:50.64.119.38 580: 574: 568: 554:50.64.119.38 550: 493: 475: 409: 321: 315: 278: 239: 198: 192: 163:Mohamed Awad 113: 110: 82: 47: 41: 3382:Please see 3125:Darylgolden 2955:WP:DEADLINK 2860:PrimeHunter 2486:(Channel 2) 2459:notabillity 2441:(Channel 2) 2415:Thank you. 2375:(Channel 2) 2076:Smallchief 2006:Smallchief 1341:Kuwaitxoxo1 1323:Kuwaitxoxo1 932:good work! 477:Mybestwords 413:Mybestwords 390:Eddie Blick 340:Eddie Blick 264:Eddie Blick 212:Eddie Blick 159:Help:Upload 155:Zeyad Ramzy 130:Zeyad Ramzy 115:Zeyad Ramzy 99:Archive 690 94:Archive 689 89:Archive 688 83:Archive 687 77:Archive 686 72:Archive 685 64:Archive 680 40:This is an 3207:Teenager16 3192:Teenager16 3096:neutrality 3009:LazyAndriy 2941:LazyAndriy 2926:LazyAndriy 2604:Nick Moyes 2589:Dapper Day 2211:or open a 2146:velut luna 1482:Nick Moyes 1459:Nick Moyes 1156:notability 994:and using 974:Corrieduke 958:Corrieduke 934:Nick Moyes 904:obligatory 900:Red Dragon 857:Nick Moyes 796:neutrality 788:notability 783:Nick Moyes 763:Nick Moyes 595:IP address 311:I JethroBT 254:I JethroBT 240:I JethroBT 134:Nick Moyes 3340:Copyright 3177:FlyingAce 3165:WikiDan61 3013:ColinFine 2891:Champeaux 2876:Champeaux 2838:Champeaux 2788:Champeaux 2660:above. -- 2599:RudolfRed 2543:RudolfRed 2463:in detail 1950:talk page 1761:ColinFine 1738:ColinFine 1208:this post 1078:WP:NFCCEG 881:ColinFine 816:ColinFine 547:Accounts. 334:Cullen328 233:from the 175:ColinFine 22:Questions 3371:Zjenjadg 3356:Zjenjadg 2786:Thanks! 2467:reliable 2359:WP:PSCOI 2351:WP:PROMO 2128:MITA PAL 2116:contribs 2108:MITA PAL 2104:unsigned 1864:unsigned 1829:SunnyBoi 1814:SunnyBoi 1348:Eagleash 1331:contribs 1319:unsigned 446:Ariconte 203:abstract 20:‎ | 3419:Tigraan 3401:Tigraan 3392:notable 3369:Hello, 3251:Thanks 3186:Editing 3159:Hello, 2496:Maproom 2272:Tigraan 2218:Tigraan 2138:fortuna 2062:Tigraan 1795:Hello, 1753:331d3ot 1707:WP:NWEB 1679:331d3ot 1611:331d3ot 1590:331d3ot 1571:WP:NWEB 1386:Commons 1298:Tigraan 1213:bonadea 1164:Maproom 830:Revert. 777:Hello, 721:notable 439:person. 436:WP:PAID 384:Gab4gab 369:Gab4gab 363:Teblick 307:paywall 303:Teblick 235:journal 228:Teblick 167:notable 153:Hello, 128:Hello, 43:archive 3120:WP:YFA 3100:WP:G11 3082:Hello 3064:(TW)) 2481:insane 2436:insane 2425:WP:PCD 2370:insane 2285:again. 2263:WP:RFC 2205:obtain 2132:WP:G11 2040:copied 1939:should 1838:Cullen 1729:at all 1711:331dot 1664:331dot 1643:331dot 1575:331dot 1563:WP:COI 1549:331dot 1473:Zamzar 1455:Theora 1281:WP:ANI 1000:331dot 877:WP:BRD 711:Hello 653:Cullen 575:Cullen 569:formal 316:Cullen 3055:: --> 2743:Nthep 2679:: --> 2475:-A la 2430:-A la 2411:Nthep 2396:Nthep 2364:-A la 2259:WP:3O 2126:Dear 1567:WP:RS 1392:Davey 1365:Davey 1210:). -- 1070:a lot 728:them. 725:WP:RS 281:X-Men 16:< 3360:talk 3331:talk 3269:Hey 3259:talk 3205:Hey 3196:talk 3150:talk 3114:and 3073:talk 3017:talk 3011:. -- 2939:Hey 2930:talk 2910:talk 2895:talk 2880:talk 2864:talk 2792:talk 2747:talk 2725:talk 2707:talk 2689:talk 2666:talk 2648:talk 2630:talk 2608:talk 2594:this 2567:talk 2547:talk 2526:talk 2500:talk 2400:talk 2335:talk 2308:talk 2291:talk 2240:talk 2182:talk 2112:talk 2080:talk 2010:talk 1997:. 1974:talk 1924:talk 1872:talk 1818:talk 1771:talk 1757:and 1742:talk 1733:only 1715:talk 1690:talk 1668:talk 1647:talk 1621:talk 1600:talk 1579:talk 1553:talk 1531:talk 1500:100% 1486:talk 1463:talk 1451:WebM 1435:talk 1418:100% 1397:2010 1370:2010 1352:talk 1327:talk 1267:you. 1248:talk 1238:and 1221:talk 1199:here 1187:talk 1168:talk 1104:Hey 1095:talk 1076:and 1044:talk 1025:talk 1004:talk 962:talk 938:talk 912:talk 896:here 885:talk 879:. -- 873:ping 861:talk 852:here 840:talk 820:talk 814:. -- 767:talk 702:talk 674:talk 604:talk 558:talk 537:talk 501:talk 481:talk 450:talk 417:talk 394:talk 373:talk 344:talk 289:talk 283:. -- 268:talk 216:talk 179:talk 173:. -- 138:talk 119:talk 2836:Hi 2806:. 2465:in 2347:not 1969:Joe 1935:can 1453:or 717:any 510:Hi 3362:) 3333:) 3261:) 3213:. 3198:) 3152:) 3075:) 3019:) 2932:) 2912:) 2897:) 2882:) 2866:) 2856:}} 2850:{{ 2794:) 2749:) 2727:) 2709:) 2691:) 2668:) 2650:) 2642:-- 2632:) 2610:) 2569:) 2549:) 2528:) 2502:) 2478:d 2433:d 2402:) 2394:. 2367:d 2337:) 2310:) 2293:) 2261:, 2242:) 2232:if 2215:. 2184:) 2118:) 2114:• 2082:) 2042:}} 2038:{{ 2012:) 1967:– 1964:}} 1958:{{ 1926:) 1887:. 1874:) 1820:) 1773:) 1744:) 1717:) 1692:) 1684:-- 1670:) 1649:) 1623:) 1602:) 1581:) 1555:) 1533:) 1488:) 1465:) 1437:) 1354:) 1333:) 1329:• 1250:) 1189:) 1170:) 1097:) 1046:) 1038:-- 1027:) 1006:) 964:) 940:) 914:) 887:) 863:) 842:) 822:) 798:, 794:, 790:, 769:) 704:) 676:) 606:) 560:) 539:) 522:: 503:) 483:) 452:) 419:) 396:) 375:) 346:) 291:) 270:) 248:r 218:) 181:) 140:) 121:) 68:← 3377:. 3358:( 3329:( 3305:G 3302:M 3299:G 3257:( 3223:G 3220:M 3217:G 3194:( 3148:( 3071:( 3067:( 3015:( 2992:G 2989:M 2986:G 2977:. 2967:. 2957:. 2928:( 2908:( 2893:( 2878:( 2862:( 2826:s 2823:r 2820:i 2817:f 2814:b 2811:D 2790:( 2745:( 2723:( 2705:( 2687:( 2664:( 2646:( 2628:( 2606:( 2584:) 2580:( 2565:( 2545:( 2524:( 2498:( 2421:: 2417:@ 2413:: 2409:@ 2398:( 2388:: 2384:@ 2333:( 2306:( 2289:( 2238:( 2196:: 2192:@ 2180:( 2110:( 2078:( 2008:( 1976:) 1972:( 1952:( 1922:( 1897:G 1894:M 1891:G 1870:( 1816:( 1769:( 1763:: 1759:@ 1755:: 1751:@ 1740:( 1713:( 1703:: 1699:@ 1688:( 1681:: 1677:@ 1666:( 1660:: 1656:@ 1645:( 1634:: 1630:@ 1619:( 1613:: 1609:@ 1598:( 1592:: 1588:@ 1577:( 1551:( 1545:: 1541:@ 1529:( 1484:( 1461:( 1433:( 1350:( 1343:: 1339:@ 1325:( 1263:: 1259:@ 1246:( 1201:. 1185:( 1166:( 1151:) 1147:( 1133:G 1130:M 1127:G 1093:( 1042:( 1023:( 1002:( 976:: 972:@ 960:( 936:( 910:( 883:( 859:( 838:( 818:( 765:( 738:) 734:( 700:( 672:( 640:s 637:r 634:i 631:f 628:b 625:D 602:( 556:( 535:( 499:( 479:( 448:( 415:( 392:( 386:: 382:@ 371:( 365:: 361:@ 342:( 336:: 332:@ 287:( 266:( 256:: 252:@ 230:: 226:@ 214:( 177:( 151:) 147:( 136:( 117:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 687 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index