977:
the situation. Your experience and practice may not be prepared for the reaction. I cannot emphasize this enough. How someone react in public around others may be different and less severe than what someone may in an anonymous setting. This very well may have been what you experienced. Obvious;y, it does not happen all the time to every one but it can happen. It is disturbing because you do not expect it or may think that it is not appropriate but it is out of your control and you may never experience it again (thank god). The reasons the other person reacted as such may never have a plausible explanation or ever been in a state of mind to say that it should not have been done. The best thing it seems is to limit as much as possible your actions in the situation. All you can hope is that the other party is relying on themselves for entertainment and forget about you. If they start to bother you by initiating action toward you without you bringing it on, then by all means bring it to the attention of the WP community. It should not get to that point. I hope this assures you of your well being.
2396:~300 passengers was stuck between the Costa Concordia - which had listed 55 degrees to starboard by that time - and the lifeboat davits. Schettino identified these hazards and notified the Italian Coast Guard that he was leaving the Concordia b/c there were 300 passengers stuck in a lifeboat that was in danger of being crushed by the Concordia. This fact is why he only got one year in prison for abandoning ship before all passengers were evac'd. After this occurred, Italian Coast Guard and Army helicopters only recorded removing 87 more passengers from the port evac deck, to include the first mate and engineer who were on the port side evacuating personnel on the Schettino's orders. The intention is to obtain the proper citation information for the documents and videos that contain this information. The question was if the talk page of an article the proper place to discuss theses issues and present citations before editing the article and figuratively
1004:, Regardless of whether they could have interacted better, I can see where they're coming from. (My reading, sorry for the mind-reading:) You were having a nice cordial discussion which led them to assume an amount of mutual respect incompatible (in their view at least) with the use of the revert button. Not only did you revert them, you left them a message about the revert at their talk page, instead of continuing the discussion you were already having on the article talk (a revert notification on talk page has connotations, not all of them positive). They obviously took it as a personal insult (either the revert alone or revert+user:talk posting). They were still civil enough, and asked for cessation of "edit-warring" and continuing dialog, at that point. Your use of the word "wrong" was seen as an assertion rather than an argument
1074:" I used that word to explain to try to explain myself, not to attack him, but I don't know why he felt that that I used "you're wrong" instead of explaining what the problem was. Also I used the word "wrong" 2 days before my first message on his talk page and I went on to apologize multiple times for that. I understand the fact that he was disappointed from the fact that I got him to accept my version, but my intention was just to clarify the situation, I didn't want to "harass" him, and I don't think I did honestly. Anyway, thanks to your explanation I understood that I shouldn't have continued the discussion. My hope is just that this situation could be resolved, so that we can both (me and him) edit the same article without having to discuss further. --
2596:- 200 of of which were Level 1 warnings! So your statement about bots was quite wrong. As I generally feel no need to be unnecessarily obnoxious to other people from the off, I normally only start with a level two warning if an editor is particularly nasty or clearly offensive and has involved some thought and intent in their vandalism, or made multiple successive bad edits in a short space of time. Most vandals are just silly children or immature teenagers, maybe testing out whether they can change stuff about their school or hated football team. Us acting like storm-troopers towards them right from the start seems unnecessarily harsh and genuinely offputting, and may just serve to encourage them more in their bad ways.
2264:. Knowledge is consciously and intentionally based on reliably published information: unpublished information has no place in it. Unfortunately this does sometimes mean that somebody knows that information in an article is inaccurate, but cannot get it changed because that's what the reliable sources say. In order to challenge such information, you would have to get the different information published by a reputable publisher - and even then, it would be up to a consensus of editors to decide how to handle the disagreement between sources. Often the best you could do would be for the article to say that sources A, B, and C say XYZ while source D says PQR. --
726:. You must have got the data from somewhere on that site (unless you made it up, or got it from elsewhere), so please could I ask you to return and improve each of these references to that other users can verify each of the factual statements. I can see that you are an expert in your field, but it is very important to all users of Knowledge content - from students to other medical practitioners - that they can check for themselves the veracity of all statistical and other information provided. Then it would be fine to remove that template, but not before. I'm sorry about that, but I thank you for your desire to see the page improved. You might like to read
2071:), should there be an issue that can't be simply resolved. More commonly, we do temporarily protect articles if they come under sustained vandalism by multiple people, though we never do this preemptively, or if only one user is causing problems. Then we simply block them from editing completely! We do have other mechanisms I won't bore you with. I hope this gives you and their family, some reassurance that Wikipedians here take very seriously any interference with articles, especially of living or recently deceased persons, and always want to protect their interests if unsubstantiated content is inserted without good cause.
3237:. Wagga wagga had been cited as his birthplace since the beginning. Assuming these two place are completely different, I suggest you remove the location given in the infobox and replace it with Wagga Wagga, and give a brief explanatory edit summary why you're doing that. But it's first probably well worth doing a bit of online research to look for other biographical sources to help you determine correct information. If in doubt, just leave your concerns on the article's Talk page for other editors to address. Hoping this helps,
2075:
photographer, personally own the rights to, and are wiling and able to freely release into the public domain, but this can sometimes be one way that someone close to a deceased person with a page about them on
Knowledge can help provide a suitable image which may forever be a part of that independent memorial to their legacy of achievements. We can offer advice on how that is best done, should you ever require assistance. I do hope I have not spoken insensitively on this matter. Kind regards from the UK,
2231::I am an incident investigator and HSE Systems Lead in the Oil & Gas Industry. As such, I spend considerable time and effort taking second (or third) looks at "disasters" (not always the word we use because of its pejorative connotations) in various industries - O&G and otherwise. Often we find that what happened and how it happened are not accurately reported in the media - which is where much of the citations in Knowledge come from, especially with regard to industry disasters.
1028:
agreeing to your version (more like withdrawing in frustration) because you were " determined to revert future edits (...) no matter what"? Demanding an apology from them, by visiting their talk page was a particularly poor way to go about trying to mend the relationship. Considering that they had clearly withdrawn from the article talk the day before, and wanted nothing more to do with it (they even gave you the last word there), whatever did you really mean by
1104:). The citation needed template is Knowledge lingo for "it's unlikely enough to just take your word for it (interesting/ extraordinary claim)". Users aren't allowed to edit others' comments on talk/discussion pages, even if not in the middle of a dispute, so they shouldn't have done that. If they had done the same as a reply of their own, that would be fine however, since it's not pointless, but conveys a generally well understood meaning in Knowledge talk.
2559:. I mostly use level one warnings for...well...users who are fairly obviously children, and I mean that literally. Inserting "Hi Knowledge!" into an article probably deserves a level one. They're probably kids, and they're probably just testing to see if they can really edit. We don't really want to scare them away. We actually kindof want them to stay and figure out how to contribute productively, but we don't want them to keep doing what they're doing.
35:
718:. This is not sufficient to allow anyone else to check statistical information you include. You need to use our readily available 'Cite' templates (available in the editing tool) to give individual web page references, access dates and, when it's a long 200+ page pdf publication, or a big book, a page number or numbers of where those statistics can be found. In another place you write about population numbers, thus:
714:. I would be happy to remove it for you. However, although you have put in a lot of work to improve the article, I'm afraid you have not done a good job with adding your own new references. For example, you have made nine separate factual statements, and have left users floundering with just a homepage url to Institute for Health Metrics (not Matrics!) and Evaluation at
422:
1240:. The first change (the Globe and Mail cite about the merger) was correct – I just expanded the original some. The second change just had the "wrong" title (it actually came from the last heading on the page). The last change was weird – probably a bug at the Sun's site – redirecting to a totally different article. That happened unintentionally when
1112:
opportunities where you'll find yourselves on the same side of a dispute (one might even have reason to come to the rescue of another) and this will all be water under the bridge, a sort of an overreaction in the past to look back at and laugh about. So, do not worry about it any further. Just drop the stick for now, and hope for the best. Regards!
2054:, who I suspect you may well be referring to. That reporting is often then used by editors here to add content to Knowledge. Now, if it appears that malicious and unsubstantiated/unverifiable content has been added to an article about such a person, then it is OK for anyone - including you - to delete it immediately, per our policy about
2364:. Finally, even if the "real" cause of a "disaster" was subsequently reported upon by reliable sources at a later date, removal of the older "incorrect" content might not be as preferred as tweaking it in some way to which not only incorporates the new content but also shows that mistakes in determining the cause were initially made. --
2720:: 10 March 2018), Robert Clark Davis, 30 Dec 1902, Cambridge, Massachusetts; citing reference ID #p345 ln1376, Massachusetts Archives, Boston; FHL microfilm 2,057,388. Whatever I'm doing, I'm doing it wrong. I've read the directions, and just don't understand what I'm doing wrong. Thank you for any help you might be able to give.
2680:, but created it directly into mainspace. As you've requested deletion as the sole editor of the new page, it won't get anyone reviewing it, or 'new page patrolling' it. But you should get a notification when it has been deleted. I then realised you'd made two articles with very similar names! I'm glad David beat me to a reply.
1268:
I spent some time rescuing some more cites from archives and updated the infobox from the 2018 annual report, which I cited. A couple of the sources are dead and there was no archive snapshot, so new sources should be found. The article text could use some updating from the annual report and progress
2886:
If you wish to amend or clarify your question, please ask a follow up question in this same section instead of removing your question and its reply. Questions are kept for the benefit of all, including other new users who might have the same question. Regarding your first question, there is no way
2395:
it. This is a verifiably inaccurate statement for many reasons. When
Schettino departed the Costa Concordia, he was the only person left on the starboard evacuation deck (verified by CCTV video of the evac deck) and he only departed the vessel because the last lifeboat which had been overloaded with
1017:
You had gotten them to accept your version, no matter their feelings. This was your victory. You could edit the article exactly as you liked it and forget about them. They had left disappointed from the conversation, so this meant you weren't going to be best buddies going forward, nor did they want
863:
and I don't understand why he's acting that way. I mean the most "rude" thing I said to him it's that he was wrong, and when he said he felt attacked for that, I went on to apologize multiple times. I'm really sorry for what is happening, it was not my intention to make him feel that way and I think
800:
Hello and welcome to the
Teahouse. I understand what you were trying to do, but sometimes it is better to let things go and move on from them. If it were me I might not have made the last post that you made on their page(which does not justify what they said, just some advice) What the other user
274:
Hello, everyone. my name is bill cage. i am a large fan of the cartoon network series regular show, and i am sure there atleast some other fans here. i started trying to write articles for episodes and characters, the only problem is that the show has 261 individual episodes, and i don't if i can do
3292:
posted above, I also suggest that you do some minor changes or copyediting first. That is how I started. Back then, I was not yet familiar with the interface, format, style, and referencing requirements, among others. Doing small changes will not only allow you to start improving articles with less
3105:
how to use the 'Cite' button in the editing tool you're using. You add the reference right after the factual statement you've added (i.e. 'inline), and these citations almost magically appear in the
References section at the bottom of the page. You don't actually add the references to the bottom of
1021:
You could have said, "I didn't realise at the time that using the revert button would be a big deal. I will never do it again when in the middle of a discussion and propose my objections here instead. How about we restore it to its original before we began, and ask for a third opinion on what would
976:
It is a natural reaction to want seen that which is believed wrong to be corrected. Understand that the internet is probably the most anonymous and impersonal means of communicating of people that may best to left to their own selves. There may be underlying unexplained circumstances that play into
249:
source like your website or a personal document. There are newspaper clippings posted on your website listing your father as graduating from high school in 1955. If he was born in May 1939, then that would mean he graduated when he was likely 16 years old, which seems a bit younger than usual but I
2820:
I don't really understand your first question, but a page is protected only where absolutely necessary - there would have to be a significant amount of disruption to warrant protection. I can't say if it is appropriate without seeing the article in question, but if you think it is then you can ask
2062:
if it is clearly maliciously false and not supported by any reliable, published source (such as quality news outlets or books/magazines). Plain and simple censorship by anyone connected with that person just because they don't like seeing a well-cited story emerging in the press is not acceptable,
1295:
with original research. What is an appropriate template to place on a user's talk page to warn about such behaviour? It sort of is vandalism, but I'm not experienced enough to know. Advise here for me and perhaps additional advice placed on that user's talk page might be useful. Thanks in advance.
1027:
You tried to have it both ways. That's why they got annoyed, and it only escalated from there. Whatever gave you the impression that you could reconcile, after your exchange ended disharmonious, the day before, and you hadn't made any concessions despite them clearly indicating that they were only
171:
As per your response, I am NOT part of any company or corporation. I am alone & was simply making corrections to wrong info in the Booth Lusteg
Knowledge article. Also there is no conflict of interest. I am the daughter of the subject & was giving you the facts based on proof. Please make
2340:
and issues generally get sorted out when there are a number of editors working on a "hot topic". It's also likely that new information will be made available after much more time has passed which can be used to "correct" things originally added. Basically, it's going to depend upon whether you're
2421:, then it should be OK to update the relevant article's to reflect such information. Whether that means that older information should be removed, however, isn't so clear and it might be possible to incorporate both the old and new. However, if you simply want to update the information based upon
1759:
article and every time I make an edit is undone or reverted. Theere many wrong links etc things on the article and some have to delete or update to the right one. At first I move the article to Loukas Yorkas from Loukas
Giorkas because this is the correct name and I want to delete Loukas Giorkas
1111:
would be of help here, since its clear it was too early to try what you tried at their talk page and had the opposite effect (they almost definitely saw it as gloating). If you and them both turn out to be good faith editors dedicated to contributing free knowledge for all, you will have future
1582:
I'm not a reveiwer, but I hope your draft will be accepted this time. As I expect you know, there is a long backlog of drafts awaiting review, and any volunteer looking at a draft once declined for lack of references will look for good references that have been added since the last review.
147:
Concerns over article content should be raised on the relevant article's talk page. Random expletives are unlikely to be met anywhere with anything more than disinterest, disdain and mild irritation. 'List of' pages should only contain names of notable people with articles already about them
2074:
It might be worth me taking the opportunity to mention that there is potentially an opportunity for a friend, family member or, indeed, business colleague to upload a photograph of that person, should their article not have a photo of them already. It would need to be a photo that they, as
2066:
However, you may be assured that many people monitor these pages and swiftly remove obviously false or bad faith edits. If they don't, then please come back and tell us. We even have a special place to report issues relating to articles about living and recently deceased persons (see
2620:
After publishing an article about Cassie Premo Steele today I noticed that the article appears to be live on
Knowledge. However, I did not receive a notice saying that the article was being reviewed by editors. Can you provide information on the status of the article? Thank you.
2095:
I've started to notice many pages with categories which are suspicious. I could not find any official statements about the appropriateness of categorization. Do we not care? Several instances where categories are essentially stating things about a person or subject which are:
2591:
and I, for one, always start with a level 1 warning for the same reason. Put simply: that's where they should normally start. So add me to your list of people you might think of who do use Level 1 warnings! And you should probably also add Clue Bot NG, too, to your list.
2425:
such as investigative reports or other documentation, even official stuff, then care probably needs to be taken. Editors are not really supposed to be adding their own interpretations to sources cited in the article and presenting such content in
Knowledge's voice per
1690:
Hello Dr Anna-Marie le Roux! It's not clear what you mean; interested in what exactly? This is a place for new editors to seek help with problems they come across while trying to edit
Knowledge. Are you interested in adding results of the study to any of our articles?
2390:
about the information our investigations and investigation reviews reveal. We are normally conducting these 5-7 years after a fact. For example, Captain
Francesco Schettino of the Costa Concordia is thought to have left 300 passengers on board the vessel when he
2990:
On the page in question several references ar mad, but none of them show the track listing as it appears in the article. Track 1 should be Jenny Dreamed Of Trains. The listed track 1 is actually track two, and all others move down one. The final (15th) track is
1976:
Hello, I am looking for assistance in protecting a page. I represent a Grammy Award-winning singer-songwriter who has recently passed away in a fatal car accident. His family would like to protect his page from future edits for people outside his family.
1667:
I am busy with a study (it is written in Afrikaans) about the phenomena of intertextuality and intermediality as illustrated in the opera librettos and a few important arias. I was wondering if you would be interested. Dr Anna-Marie le Roux, Windhoek
3265:
Thanks for wanting to help, you can do whatever piques your interest! There are articles that need updating, typos that need fixing, just about anything you can think of. Start by checking out the tutorial and online interactive learning game at
2110:
Essentially people are using categories to label articles in a dishonest or manipulative manner - unsupported by the text. Could someone please direct me to guiding policy here? Or let me off the hook and I'll just try to ignore the cats. Thanks!
1022:
be best?" They might have agreed, or left anyway, you might have gotten your version or have had it rejected in the end, had they agreed to stay. Whatever might have happened, that was the last moment to salvage your relationship with the editor.
1631:, and to make all the references in-line. Should "Retiard" be "retired"? It doesn't say in the reference. You might change "there" to "their" in a couple of places. Reveiwers might decline a badly-written article.
250:
guess is possible. Are you aware of any old newspaper clippings or books which list your dad's birth year as 1938? If you are, then please add that information to the article's talk page as well. Finally, please read
244:
also lists your dad's date of birth as May 8, 1939. Now, it's possible that both of these are incorrect, but we need something which shows he was born in 1938 and not 1939, and it needs to be something other than a
1496:
I notice that, since the draft was declined for lack of sources, you have added just one source (worldfootball.net). I don't know whether this will be considered adequate, but it might be a good idea to add other
669:
Please I wish the request stated in the aforementioned subject/headline (Request to remove the link "This article needs additional verification..." be removed in the the article "Health in Cameroon") be effected.
492:
to suggest edits - simply place {{Edit semi-protected}} in a new section, then detail the changes you wish to make. An autoconfirmed user will then either carry out the edits, or detail why they can't be done.
1941:
Hi could someone have a look at the article I have created? Walewijn ( Walewyn ) van der Veen. It was declined and I wonder if some of you have a few suggestions. I have in the meantime made a few changes.
2676:, you will see that you placed a deletion request on the article. At the time of this reply, it has not yet been deleted, but may be very soon. At a quick glance, it looks like you did not submit it to
275:
that by myself. so i ask you, will some of you help me in my project, which will involve me and one other person writing articles about characters, and we all pitch in to write for every single episode?
2298:
initially - answered my question in full. Your last sentence regarding compare/contrast was also a salient and useful piece of information. I shall trudge onto the breach armed with these tidbits. --
1072:
The way you changed it is wrong because it makes it look like Lumière is a city, when it's not, and you are not specifying the festival names either, so if my "version" is wrong, yours is even worse.
801:
said was inappropriate(and I've told the other user that), but they do have the right to request that you not post on their user talk page. If the dispute about article content continues, there are
2716:
Roland Clark Davis, according to the City of Cambridge Registered Births was born on 30 Dec, not 20 Dec. This is the reference "Massachusetts Births, 1841-1915," database with images, FamilySearch (
1886:
If I visit an old external link on a page, is it better to leave the |accessdate= alone in the citation so we can see how long it's been there, or should I update it to show that it's still valid?
1338:
1297:
978:
198:
I have added a new section heading above your message as I suspect that your message may not be related to Mazewaxie's topic in which you placed it. I believe that instead you may be referring to
3093:
and welcome to the Teahouse. I'm glad you recognise the importance of adding references to support all content that you might add. We have what is meant to be a helpful page for beginners called
3126:
am new to wikipedia and i have been hearing about wikipedia monuments but has no idea as to what it is. there is also one of them which is wikipedia commons. can someone please explain to me.
1070:
by saying "I'm right and you're wrong". You wrote that my use of the word "wrong" was seen as an assertion rather than an argument, but I think you could have misread something because I wrote "
1827:
by the article's subject or anyone else who represents them. Knowledge is not interested in what a person wants to say about themselves or how they wish to be portrayed. Article content is a
1835:
have chosen to publish about them. If there is disagreement about content, a discussion should be started on the article's talk page, where you and other editors should try to arrive at a
2995:
ie Dreamed Of Trains (and is a bonus track.) This can be verified at the Discogs reference , the Amazon link . The World cat link has the first 14 correct but misses track 15. Regards
2352:. If you're simple going to rely on your personal knowledge of events or what "official" investigative reports have to say, then you're probably going to have a bit of hard time per
1010:
There's still nothing wrong with the way I would have edited it, but if you are determined to revert my future edits on this no matter what then I accept it as a matter of consensus.
3203:
In the general text his place of birth is recorded as wagga wagga, however in his summary box his place of birth is recoprded as west wyalong
3322:
I now need to enter citations and change the photograph but I really don't have a clue as every time I try the help part, it sends me all over the place and then it's not a need.
1917:, then it is well worth updating the accessdate. If you are not willing to make that check, then leave it. If the link is valid, but no longer verifies the information, then see
770:" without an apparent reason. How should I deal with it? I just wanted to be polite but I don't know how should I behave now. I would be glad if someone could help me. Thanks,
2729:
2068:
1808:
and should not edit the article directly. Please don't repeatedly re-add the material to the article after you've been told that it's inappropriate. Such behaviour is called
1342:
1301:
982:
2256:, and welcome to the Teahouse. Yes, an article's talk page is the best place to discuss this (please don't refer to an article as a "wiki": The whole of Knowledge is
1186:
Out of curiosity, I looked at some of the other links and found one that has apparently been there since 2007. Footnote 16 link leads to an escort service webpage.
720:"There has been substantial increase from 2.3 million in 1900 through 4.34, 8.66, 11.7, 15.4, 20.1 millions in the years 1950, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010 respectively."
3078:
1006:
In future, saying "you're wrong" instead of explaining what the problem is and giving reasons for what you want might risk the perception of a personal attack.
298:
enough to deserve its own article. Anyway, they are already mentioned on their respective show. Also, tell me what is the show articles you want to work on. --
484:
The article is semi protected, requiring users to have 10 edits over 4 days to edit the page. You can either wait until you meet this criteria, or place the
896:
I'm not really sure what the issue that user has is. They clearly feel wronged somehow, but I'm not sure why or what is causing them to react as they are.
2050:
We are sorry to learn of your loss. Media coverage of the death of notable people obviously attracts a lot of newspaper coverage, as in the recent case of
1195:
I am an occasional editor at best and I don't know what to do with this. Should I delete the link? Siku News doesn't keep article for that length of time.
2773:
2237:: Is discussing the facts discovered in these post-investigation reviews and how these should be cited best held on the talk page of an event's wiki?
319:
i would simply like for at least the main characters to be written about, and if not every individual episode, then at least the most popular episodes.
2502:
Level 1 warning is usually for new editors, for "unconstructive" edits, to help get them on the right path. You don't need to start at level 1. See
473:
199:
101:
93:
88:
76:
71:
63:
3198:
2130:
1481:
and it has been "pending" for nearly 11 weeks I know that some have been waiting longer but I would really appreciate it if someone reviewed it.
3218:
2941:
2822:
2328:
which is why editors are generally encouraged to wait a bit until the dust somewhat settles before creating articles about certain things (see
1786:
129:
1100:
I meant ""wrong" was seen" as such by them going by the quote, not that it's a fact. Their "LMAO" doesn't matter and could/should be ignored (
3352:
2987:
Apologies for not creating an account - looking at all the talk here means that I don't think I have any hope of editing a page succesfully.
2163:
Thanks so much! This is exactly what I was missing and now I see that I have a pile of mis-categorization to clean up woohoo (I like work) --
1036:
Just hoping this helps make sense. Let me know if I missed something. Feel free to redact anything that crosses the line in my mind-readings.
352:
309:
2996:
2721:
1216:
555:
which will show you how to convert your references into in-line citations. Each statement should have a specific reference to support it.
3141:
2929:
2809:
1675:
1628:
691:
552:
536:
1032:, when the last post on that page is by you which hadn't been replied to by them for 27 hours at that point (not that they have since).
607:
has been nominated for Speedy Deletion for copyright infringement in addition to being highly promotional and not properly referenced.
2872:
1700:
1121:
1049:
394:
1478:
3356:
3074:
1431:
240:, at least for Knowledge purposes. You might not have noticed, but the Buffalo Bills 1967 year book you have posted on your website
2907:
I need a page to be semi-protected so help me in that. The page is regularly experiencing vandalism and want that to be protected.
2336:
about it, some editors want to get it on Knowledge asap. This isn't necessarily a bad thing per se because a Knowledge article is
2944:. Is there something about those replies which you don't understand? It isn't obvious that there has been regular vandalism at
1992:
1244:
expanded the cite in June. I updated it to use the archive.org snapshot from 2012. I'm changing the inconsistent dates next...
187:
254:
because you are considered to have a conflict of interest with respect to anything written about your father on Knowledge. --
3340:
3157:
3094:
2769:
2755:
1292:
659:
Request to remove the link "This article needs additional verification..." be removed in the the article "Health in Cameroon"
586:
1611:
AfC review says eight weeks, but almost a third have been awaiting a review longer than that, a few as much as five months.
585:
You had been told that the problem with the previous submission was lack of inline citations. You had been given a link to
3365:
1156:
1089:
965:
939:
918:
885:
841:
785:
730:
which is a rather complex attempt to help beginners understand how to add references to the best of their ability, or see
469:
2434:; moreover, primary sources can be somewhat tricky to use, particularly when it involves claims about living persons per
3090:
3070:
1901:
485:
21:
1137:
Thanks for giving me a third person perspective on the matter. I really appreciate what you suggested and I will do as
706:, and welcome to the Teahouse. Goodness, that template was there for a long time! When it was added the article looked
3161:
2789:
How can I give information to editors only with this coding (I don't know the exact so here's the known one to me) -
1953:
1714:
458:
Hello, Can I edit the page about Bigg Boss Season 3 which is locked ? There are many new details to add to that page
3214:
2286:, You shared some specific information with me. I found it most helpful. You have my gratitude. I read and re-read
2190:
1782:
1765:
1498:
125:
42:
2765:
2751:
2291:
1812:; it is considered disruptive and can lead to sanctions. Instead, please suggest edits on the article talk page (
1718:
348:
305:
3052:
3004:
2697:
1008:(in contrast to theirs, where it was a part of an argument). They threw the ball in your court when they wrote:
3000:
2953:
2725:
2652:
1212:
1066:. I asked to him to apologize only to make peace, and because he got offended from my use of the word "wrong",
866:
594:
465:
215:
3293:
chance of making mistakes but also help you get a feel of how things are done. You can take a look at these
3137:
2968:
2925:
2805:
2405:
2303:
2287:
2261:
2242:
1679:
1312:
687:
532:
3230:
3210:
232:
which lists the correct date of birth of your dad, then please post a comment with a link to the source at
2673:
2573:
2324:), but it can cover retractions or corrections made by media about events such as a "disaster". Knowledge
2168:
2119:
1237:
489:
1263:
1208:
3153:
3133:
2401:
2317:
2299:
2253:
2238:
2213:
2201:
2186:
2034:
1869:
1796:
1778:
1761:
1710:
1616:
1572:
1536:
1489:
1427:
1311:
I would start with {{subst:uw-unsourced1}}, moving up the numbers if it continues. (the full list is at
1288:
703:
683:
612:
604:
548:
528:
521:
Please help me to publish renowned chef rakesh sethis article and or page,he is a know celebrity chef.
382:
142:
121:
2945:
2911:
2478:
know what they are doing is wrong and having a 'kid-glove' warning level just seems sort of pointless.
2260:
of the many thousands of wikis on the internet!). However, please have a look at the core principle of
870:
and I plan on improving it in the next few weeks/months, I'm worried that this thing could continue. --
2185:
On my Edit pages, much of the type has turned purple. How do I turn it back to the way it was before?
3328:
3302:
3242:
3206:
3129:
3111:
3066:
2917:
2797:
2761:
2685:
2669:
2626:
2622:
2601:
2545:
2484:
2435:
2080:
1980:
1913:. Good question. I would say: if you are willing to take the time to check that the link still works
1889:
1774:
1671:
1466:
1449:
1419:
1204:
739:
679:
524:
461:
342:
299:
175:
153:
117:
3370:
3344:
3306:
3283:
3246:
3222:
3187:
3145:
3115:
3082:
3048:
There can be multiple editions of an album, with variation in which songs appear and in what order.
2972:
2957:
2933:
2896:
2876:
2842:
2813:
2777:
2689:
2656:
2630:
2605:
2575:
2550:
2515:
2489:
2459:
2409:
2373:
2307:
2273:
2246:
2217:
2194:
2172:
2154:
2123:
2084:
2045:
2038:
2005:
1996:
1984:
1965:
1930:
1873:
1855:
1769:
1744:
1704:
1683:
1654:
1620:
1606:
1567:
I have added several sources and another reference. hopefully the draft will be accepted this time!
1524:
1470:
1435:
1403:
1346:
1332:
1305:
1273:
1248:
1231:
1220:
1162:
1125:
1095:
1053:
986:
971:
945:
905:
891:
847:
814:
791:
743:
695:
648:
616:
598:
578:
540:
510:
477:
448:
440:
430:
398:
378:
372:
364:
356:
336:
328:
320:
313:
291:
284:
276:
263:
225:
219:
191:
179:
157:
133:
3332:
3289:
3279:
3271:
2949:
2648:
2647:
and not visible in search engines such as Google, but it is indeed a live article in Knowledge. --
2636:
2511:
2503:
2455:
2415:
2369:
2345:
2337:
2329:
2269:
2205:
1988:
1926:
1836:
1150:
1083:
959:
933:
879:
835:
779:
621:
Perhaps I should have looked more carefully at past edits, particularly the hijacking of the older
590:
444:
368:
324:
280:
259:
229:
211:
183:
236:. It's possible that the Pro Football Reference page currently cited in the article is wrong, but
3336:
3267:
3098:
3023:
2964:
2921:
2883:
2848:
2837:
2801:
2663:
2149:
1813:
1446:, welcome to the Teahouse. Do you have a question about editing Knowledge that we can help with?
1327:
759:
755:
727:
505:
51:
17:
859:
I'm writing this here because I don't want to potentially worsen the situation. I just saw what
2014:, which I will leave further instructions on on your user talk page. Sorry for your loss, but
415:
3363:
3036:
2865:
2644:
2588:
2560:
2422:
2357:
2325:
2164:
2115:
1961:
1918:
1693:
1132:
1114:
1042:
387:
251:
246:
233:
2531:
start with level two, it just seems under the circumstances a level one warning is just ...
2892:
2668:
Interesting - I had a completely different answer! I tried to say: Welcome to the Teahouse,
2439:
2333:
2209:
2030:
1897:
1865:
1851:
1612:
1568:
1532:
1485:
1443:
1423:
1399:
1385:
1375:
1365:
1355:
1241:
1018:
any quarrel with you, obviously they couldn't wait to forget about you and that article. Or,
901:
810:
608:
3102:
2887:
to communicate with 'editors only'; any user of Knowledge can see any question or comment.
731:
200:
WP:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1015#Wrong info in "Booth Lusteg Knowledge" article on Google
3298:
3258:
3238:
3107:
2737:
2734:
2709:
2703:
2698:
2681:
2597:
2582:
2556:
2540:
2497:
2479:
2349:
2076:
2051:
1462:
1138:
1108:
1012:
You had a choice between taking your spoils and forgetting about them or making a gesture:
735:
149:
1201:
My personal preference is to let somebody more experienced deal with it. Please advise.
2940:
Two replies to your original question explained that the place to request protection is
3275:
2982:
2856:
2522:
2507:
2451:
2383:
2365:
2283:
2265:
1922:
1828:
1181:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Teck_Resources&diff=next&oldid=914472351
1142:
1075:
1001:
951:
925:
871:
827:
797:
771:
255:
2701:
I can't figure out how to add a reference and keep getting the error that <ref: -->
1755:
Hello guys, I need help develop one article. I'm trying update all the information in
864:
the accusations he's made are far too excessive. My concern is that since I'm editing
2829:
2677:
2640:
2447:
2443:
2431:
2427:
2361:
2353:
2321:
2141:
2055:
2022:
2015:
2011:
1861:
1824:
1805:
1756:
1319:
1101:
1058:
Your explanation makes enough sense to me. However, I asked him to apologize because
497:
237:
207:
2320:. It's not really Knowledge's purpose to correct content reported by the media (see
1477:
Hi all. I'm sorry to ask this but. could somebody please review my draft? it is the
341:
Oh, okay. I just want you to tell me the name of the TV series for clarification. --
3360:
2717:
2442:. Even what you posted above about the ship's captain might seem a bit suspect per
2418:
2400:
of the editors who worked hard to enter the information currently in an article. --
2342:
1957:
1840:
1832:
1817:
1809:
802:
622:
409:
1190:
1189:"Red Dog top toxic polluter". Siku News. 2007-03-31. Retrieved 2007-12-31 goes to
589:. Why, therefore, did you resubmit without having provided inline citations? --
241:
3165:
2888:
2852:
1910:
1893:
1844:
1722:
1632:
1584:
1545:
1502:
1392:
912:
897:
854:
821:
806:
626:
556:
295:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2114:(This is simultaneously posted the the support desk (and was vandalized-yay))--
2470:
Is there any reason the vandalism warning tag should have a level one setting?
2386:, perhaps I was not clear in expressing intent. There is very little that is
1284:
Appropriate way to warn user replacing sourced content with original research?
2294:. I think that these articles - apologies for using the common vernacular of
2446:
unless it's what secondary reliable sources are reporting. For reference,
924:. I don't understand it either but to me it looks like an overreaction. --
2450:
applies to all Knowledge pages, including talk pages and noticeboads. --
1313:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace
1198:
Should I leave it alone - do nothing? Does not seem like a good option.
2414:
If the findings of any subsequent investigation were things covered by
2106:
introduce non-neutral, biased, and controversial elements to an article
1030:
Can you please stop the pointless discussion on The Irishman talk page?
517:
chef rakesh sethi article and or page is facing challenge in publishing
3325:
Is there an easier guide on how to attach citations and photographs?
2862:
P.S. I edited your post to make it fully visible, hope you don't mind.
2713:
3101:). I find this a little confusingly written, so you may wish to read
2025:
rather require that the page be edited by people outside his family (
381:, you might find interested editors to collaborate with, on relevant
3233:. Good spot! West Wyalong was added in 2011, without any citation,
1453:
2792:
I also need a page to be semi-protected so help me in that too.
1801:
Because you have stated that you are a relative of Loukas Yorkas
2348:
sources in support of the changes you wish to make that are not
2332:). However, when something happens and there's a fair amount of
3164:. Ask again here if these links don't answer your questions.
3024:
https://www.discogs.com/John-Denver-All-Aboard/release/2734160
2712:
This is the page where I've been trying to edit a birth date:
2018:. It is not "his" page, it is the community's page about him.
29:
723:
2978:
Correction of page about All Aboard, John Denver's last page
2855:
for details on editor-only comments. Follow instructions at
2747:. The error was that it must be <ref name="someName": -->
2714:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Roland_Clark_Davis#Personal_history
715:
3319:
The only thing I've used Knowledge for is to edit things.
3106:
the page. Let us know how you get on. Regards from the UK,
3037:
https://www.amazon.com/All-Aboard-John-Denver/dp/B0000029ZZ
1291:
has three times now replaced referenced content in article
3274:. If you have any questions, come on back and ask away.
2135:
Don't add pages to non-neutral or unverifiable categories
1839:. If that fails, there are other mechanisms available to
2983:
https://en.wikipedia.org/All_Aboard!_(John_Denver_album)
2016:
individuals do not own articles here, the community does
1915:
and still verifies the information for which it is cited
1183:), I found a strange link - footnote 11, which I undid
950:
Anyway thanks for trying to mediate. I appreciate it. --
826:
Ok, thanks for helping me out. I wish you a nice day. --
294:. I don't think each individual character or episode is
3294:
3234:
2744:
2593:
1802:
1717:
for guidance. When you have published your study in a
1180:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
860:
767:
763:
711:
707:
3261:
to the the teahouse. What can i do to help wikipedia?
3063:
How I can add references to paragraph written by me?
2750:. I've filed the ref with the content you gave Above.
2326:
isn't really intended to be up-to-the minute like news
710:, and just before you started improving it, it looked
3156:
and welcome to the Teahouse. You might like to read
2535:. I can't think of anyone who ever uses it. Even the
1713:
and welcome to the Teahouse. You might like to read
758:, things got a little "complicated" and I decided to
3359:. Simplified versions of the simplified versions...
722:
But reference number nine just goes to Gapminder at
3194:
Re Paul kelly afl player for sydney swans,
3059:
How to add references to information provided by me
2616:
How can I get the status of an article I published?
2069:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
917:I only interacted with him on his talk page and on
202:. If you are the daughter of the subject then you
2749:, not <ref name="someName" content</ref: -->
2056:biographies of living or recently deceased persons
1860:Any search on Loukas Giorkas is now redirected to
1141:says. Thanks again and I wish you a nice day :) --
110:there are evident mistakes in list of harmoncists?
2718:https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FXHJ-3BT
2639:is one of over 5000 articles awaiting review by
206:have a conflict of interest; you need to read
2504:Knowledge:Vandalism#How_to_respond_to_vandalism
1191:http://www.sikunews.com/?artid=2873&catid=3
551:and welcome to the Teahouse. You need to read
1501:before the draft come to its second review.
8:
2224:Sharing of facts available but not included
2137:, so I'd remove them in the circumstances.
114:billford was eliminated. sucker damn hell
3326:
3204:
3127:
3064:
2915:
2795:
2759:
1978:
1887:
1772:
1669:
1663:A Study in Afrikaans about Opera Librettos
1417:
1202:
677:
522:
459:
173:
115:
2859:to request protection for a page. Cheers!
1064:adding a pointless citation template here
238:there needs to be some way to verify that
172:the corrections. Thank you, Lisa Lusteg
3199:Paul Kelly (Australian rules footballer)
2963:Replies are understandable...Thank You!
2063:I'm afraid, as has been suggested above.
3015:
2131:Knowledge:Categorization dos and don'ts
1339:2A00:23C6:FA02:EC00:F84A:9707:1890:C775
1298:2A00:23C6:FA02:EC00:F84A:9707:1890:C775
979:2605:E000:9149:8300:48BF:1B93:B5D4:3F0D
2948:so you would need to give evidence. --
2942:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
2823:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
2134:
1391:are specific to this situation too. --
1269:on things like the pollution lawsuit.
1029:
1009:
1005:
719:
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3353:User:Yunshui/References for beginners
2338:always pretty much a work-in-progress
2206:Knowledge:Help desk#Weird purple type
1948:Gabby 20:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
7:
754:Hi. I had a discussion with an user
625:page, before assuming good faith?
419:
2643:, which means that it is currently
1068:when he was the first one to use it
666:I hope this e-mail meets you well.
2758:) 05:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2743:I have fixed the message for now.
1937:Walewijn ( Walewyn ) van der Veen
1179:While researching Teck Resources (
750:Trying to communicate with an user
28:
3357:User:Yunshui/Images for beginners
2100:Not contained in the article text
1823:The content of an article is not
1816:) and back them up with links to
1492:) 11:51, 23 September 2019 (GMT)
762:to make peace, but he called me "
673:I look forward hearing from you.
2103:not supported by article sources
1575:) 12:24, 23 September 2019 (GMT)
1539:) 12:07, 23 September 2019 (GMT)
420:
33:
2704:-2019-09-24T03:42:00.000Z": -->
2699:-2019-09-24T03:42:00.000Z": -->
2594:Just look at its last 500 edits
2023:conflict of interest guidelines
3371:12:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3345:12:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3307:11:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3284:19:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
3247:10:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3223:10:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3188:10:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3158:Knowledge:Wiki Loves Monuments
3146:10:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3116:10:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3095:Help:Referencing for beginners
3083:10:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3053:09:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
3005:05:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2973:08:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2958:08:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2934:07:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2897:08:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2877:17:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2843:17:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2814:16:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2778:05:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2731:03:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2690:01:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2657:01:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2631:00:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2606:01:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2576:23:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2551:21:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2516:21:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2490:20:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2460:00:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2410:13:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2374:22:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
2308:13:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2274:21:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
2247:21:27, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
2218:00:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2195:00:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2173:23:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2155:17:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2124:17:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2085:23:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
2039:22:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1997:22:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1966:21:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1931:21:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1874:20:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1856:15:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1831:, paraphrased summary of what
1770:15:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1745:19:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1721:it might make a good source.
1705:18:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1684:17:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1655:18:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1621:15:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1607:11:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1525:11:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1471:10:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1436:10:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1404:18:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1347:17:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1333:17:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1306:17:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1293:Air Ambulance Northern Ireland
1274:17:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1249:18:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
1232:17:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
1221:16:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
1163:15:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1126:15:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1096:12:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1054:12:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
987:05:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
972:20:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
946:20:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
906:20:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
892:20:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
848:19:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
815:19:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
792:18:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
744:13:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
696:12:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
649:10:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
617:10:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
599:08:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
587:Help:Referencing for beginners
579:08:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
541:08:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
511:10:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
478:10:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
449:09:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
431:17:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
399:15:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
373:15:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
357:15:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
329:15:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
314:14:59, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
285:14:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
264:07:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
220:03:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
192:01:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
158:07:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
134:02:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
2506:for options for responding.
1450:sign your posts on talk pages
3315:New to Knowledge - Need help
2341:going to be able to provide
1629:WP:Referencing for beginners
1627:You still have time to read
553:WP:Referencing for beginners
486:Edit semi-protected template
3162:Knowledge:Wikimedia Commons
1954:Draft:Walewijn van der Veen
1904:) 2019-09-23T21:39:04 (UTC)
3387:
724:https://www.gapminder.org/
148:elsewhere on Knowledge.
3229:Welcome to the Teahouse,
3103:these notes of mine about
2977:
2091:Inappropriate Categories?
2010:You need to declare your
1760:article. Can you help me?
716:http://www.healthdata.org
2129:The short summary is at
1972:Help - protecting a page
270:A project i need help on
3295:pages needing copy edit
3257:Thank you for inviting
3091:Kundan Ravindra Dhayade
3071:Kundan Ravindra Dhayade
2821:for page protection at
2785:Editor Only Information
2398:pissing in the Wheaties
1531:Thanks! I'll do that
1479:1971-72 AFC Ajax season
1060:he started making jokes
1238:Special:Diff/917189339
734:that I have drafted.
2678:Articles for Creation
2393:pre-maturely departed
46:of past discussions.
3288:Hi! Aside from what
2766:Victor Schmidt mobil
2752:Victor Schmidt mobil
2748:content</ref: -->
2745:see what has changed
2674:Cassie premio steele
2334:significant coverage
2012:conflict of interest
1806:conflict of interest
1715:WP:Original research
1544:Thanks for the info
164:Booth Lusteg article
3290:User talk:RudolfRed
2637:Cassie Premo Steele
2133:. You've described
1833:independent writers
1825:owned or controlled
1499:WP:Reliable sources
1236:Here's what I did:
805:methods available.
663:Dear Senior Editor
490:article's talk page
466:Special Editor 2019
228:. If you know of a
2903:Protection on Page
2702:has too many names
1921:for what to do. --
1814:Talk:Loukas Yorkas
1719:WP:Reliable source
1289:User:Notfakenews63
1227:Working on it ...
1147:
1107:The wise words at
1080:
956:
930:
876:
832:
803:dispute resolution
776:
766:" and told me to "
605:Draft:Rakesh Sethi
18:Knowledge:Teahouse
3347:
3331:comment added by
3225:
3209:comment added by
3148:
3132:comment added by
3085:
3069:comment added by
2946:Doraemon in India
2936:
2920:comment added by
2912:Doraemon in India
2863:
2833:
2816:
2800:comment added by
2780:
2764:comment added by
2667:
2145:
1999:
1983:comment added by
1905:
1892:comment added by
1790:
1777:comment added by
1686:
1674:comment added by
1461:
1438:
1422:comment added by
1323:
1223:
1207:comment added by
1143:
1076:
1037:
952:
926:
872:
828:
772:
698:
682:comment added by
543:
527:comment added by
501:
480:
464:comment added by
454:Bigg Boss Tamil 3
439:no, regular show
349:Littlest Pet Shop
306:Littlest Pet Shop
234:Talk:Booth Lusteg
194:
178:comment added by
136:
120:comment added by
107:
106:
58:
57:
52:current main page
3378:
3231:Katiejack57delly
3211:Katiejack57delly
3185:
3051:
3040:
3033:
3027:
3020:
2869:
2861:
2840:
2835:
2831:
2828:
2739:
2736:
2711:
2705:
2700:
2661:
2586:
2571:
2570:
2567:
2564:
2526:
2501:
2419:reliable sources
2388:up-to-the-minute
2202:BeenAroundAWhile
2187:BeenAroundAWhile
2152:
2147:
2143:
2140:
2049:
2009:
1849:
1841:resolve disputes
1829:neutrally worded
1818:reliable sources
1800:
1797:Theodorosyiorkas
1779:Theodorosyiorkas
1762:Theodorosyiorkas
1742:
1697:
1652:
1604:
1565:
1522:
1459:
1447:
1397:
1390:
1384:
1380:
1374:
1370:
1364:
1360:
1354:
1330:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1272:
1267:
1247:
1230:
1159:
1153:
1146:
1136:
1118:
1092:
1086:
1079:
1046:
1035:
968:
962:
955:
942:
936:
929:
916:
888:
882:
875:
858:
844:
838:
831:
825:
788:
782:
775:
732:these help notes
646:
576:
508:
503:
499:
496:
429:
425:
424:
423:
391:
340:
230:secondary source
146:
143:Michael Billford
122:Michael Billford
85:
60:
59:
37:
36:
30:
3386:
3385:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3377:
3376:
3375:
3368:
3317:
3255:
3196:
3166:
3124:
3061:
3049:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3034:
3030:
3021:
3017:
2980:
2905:
2867:
2838:
2830:
2826:
2787:
2707:
2672:. If you visit
2618:
2580:
2568:
2565:
2562:
2561:
2520:
2495:
2472:
2423:primary sources
2292:reliable source
2226:
2204:. I replied at
2183:
2150:
2142:
2138:
2093:
2052:LaShawn Daniels
2043:
2003:
1974:
1952:Courtesy link:
1939:
1884:
1847:
1794:
1753:
1723:
1695:
1665:
1633:
1585:
1546:
1503:
1457:
1414:
1395:
1388:
1382:
1378:
1372:
1368:
1362:
1358:
1352:
1328:
1320:
1316:
1286:
1270:
1261:
1245:
1228:
1193:
1177:
1175:Strange link(s)
1157:
1151:
1144:
1130:
1116:
1090:
1084:
1077:
1044:
966:
960:
953:
940:
934:
927:
910:
886:
880:
873:
852:
842:
836:
829:
819:
786:
780:
773:
752:
661:
627:
557:
519:
506:
498:
494:
456:
427:
421:
416:Who's on First?
389:
344:LPS and MLP Fan
334:
301:LPS and MLP Fan
272:
168:See note below
166:
140:
112:
81:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3384:
3382:
3374:
3373:
3366:
3316:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3254:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3195:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3123:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3097:(or shortcut:
3060:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3042:
3041:
3028:
3014:
3013:
3009:
2997:203.219.44.129
2979:
2976:
2961:
2960:
2950:David Biddulph
2904:
2901:
2900:
2899:
2880:
2879:
2860:
2845:
2786:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2722:47.151.179.232
2706:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2649:David Biddulph
2617:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2578:
2471:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2377:
2376:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2277:
2276:
2225:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2182:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2158:
2157:
2108:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2092:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2072:
2064:
2041:
2027:and employment
2019:
1973:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1938:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1821:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1707:
1664:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1577:
1576:
1541:
1540:
1528:
1527:
1483:
1482:
1474:
1473:
1452:by using four
1413:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1351:The templates
1335:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1264:SilvrHairDevil
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1209:SilvrHairDevil
1188:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1105:
1038:
1033:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1013:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
948:
751:
748:
747:
746:
676:Kind Regards
660:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
591:David Biddulph
582:
581:
518:
515:
514:
513:
455:
452:
438:
436:
435:
434:
433:
402:
401:
363:Regular show.
362:
360:
359:
353:My Little Pony
317:
316:
310:My Little Pony
271:
268:
267:
266:
222:
212:David Biddulph
165:
162:
161:
160:
111:
108:
105:
104:
99:
96:
91:
86:
79:
74:
69:
66:
56:
55:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3383:
3372:
3369:
3364:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3349:
3348:
3346:
3342:
3338:
3334:
3330:
3323:
3320:
3314:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3297:. Good luck!
3296:
3291:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3273:
3269:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3260:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3201:
3200:
3193:
3189:
3186:
3184:
3181:
3178:
3175:
3172:
3169:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3154:Fibrinogen Gh
3151:
3150:
3149:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3134:Fibrinogen Gh
3131:
3122:clarification
3121:
3117:
3113:
3109:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3058:
3054:
3047:
3046:
3038:
3032:
3029:
3025:
3019:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2988:
2985:
2984:
2975:
2974:
2970:
2966:
2965:Aaryangupta23
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2935:
2931:
2927:
2923:
2922:Aaryangupta23
2919:
2913:
2908:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2885:
2884:Aaryangupta23
2882:
2881:
2878:
2875:
2874:
2871:
2870:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2849:Aaryangupta23
2846:
2844:
2841:
2836:
2824:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2803:
2802:Aaryangupta23
2799:
2793:
2790:
2784:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2757:
2753:
2746:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2732:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2665:
2664:edit conflict
2660:
2659:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2615:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2590:
2587:I agree with
2584:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2558:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2549:
2548:
2544:
2543:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2524:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2499:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2488:
2487:
2483:
2482:
2477:
2476:by definition
2469:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2436:WP:BLPPRIMARY
2433:
2429:
2424:
2420:
2417:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2402:GrantAdamCole
2399:
2394:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2344:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2318:GrantAdamCole
2315:
2314:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2300:GrantAdamCole
2297:
2293:
2289:
2288:verifiability
2285:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2262:verifiability
2259:
2255:
2254:GrantAdamCole
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2239:GrantAdamCole
2236:
2232:
2230:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2180:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2153:
2148:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2112:
2105:
2102:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2073:
2070:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2047:
2042:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2017:
2013:
2007:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1881:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1862:Loukas Yorkas
1859:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1804:, you have a
1803:
1798:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1758:
1757:Loukas Yorkas
1750:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1729:
1726:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1711:41.182.79.173
1708:
1706:
1703:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1676:41.182.79.173
1673:
1662:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1597:
1594:
1591:
1588:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1529:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1515:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1500:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1455:
1451:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1411:
1405:
1401:
1394:
1387:
1377:
1367:
1357:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1326:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1294:
1290:
1283:
1275:
1265:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1250:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1199:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1174:
1164:
1160:
1154:
1148:
1140:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1087:
1081:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1039:
1034:
1031:
1026:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1000:
999:
988:
984:
980:
975:
974:
973:
969:
963:
957:
949:
947:
943:
937:
931:
923:
921:
914:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
895:
894:
893:
889:
883:
877:
869:
868:
862:
856:
851:
850:
849:
845:
839:
833:
823:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
799:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
783:
777:
769:
765:
761:
757:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
704:Robert Foncha
701:
700:
699:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:Robert Foncha
681:
674:
671:
667:
664:
658:
650:
647:
645:
642:
639:
636:
633:
630:
624:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
583:
580:
577:
575:
572:
569:
566:
563:
560:
554:
550:
549:Sunnyparekh36
546:
545:
544:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:Sunnyparekh36
526:
516:
512:
509:
504:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
453:
451:
450:
446:
442:
432:
418:
417:
412:
411:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
384:
380:
377:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
358:
354:
350:
346:
345:
338:
333:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
297:
293:
289:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
248:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
144:
139:
138:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
109:
103:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
84:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
65:
62:
61:
53:
49:
45:
44:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
3327:— Preceding
3324:
3321:
3318:
3272:WP:ADVENTURE
3256:
3235:in this edit
3205:— Preceding
3202:
3197:
3182:
3179:
3176:
3173:
3170:
3167:
3128:— Preceding
3125:
3065:— Preceding
3062:
3031:
3018:
3010:
2992:
2989:
2986:
2981:
2962:
2916:— Preceding
2910:Page Name -
2909:
2906:
2868:Usedtobecool
2866:
2864:
2796:— Preceding
2794:
2791:
2788:
2760:— Preceding
2708:
2619:
2589:GreenMeansGo
2546:
2541:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2485:
2480:
2475:
2473:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2330:WP:RECENTISM
2295:
2257:
2234:
2233:
2228:
2227:
2184:
2181:Purple prose
2165:Luke Kindred
2116:Luke Kindred
2113:
2109:
2094:
2059:
2026:
1979:— Preceding
1975:
1947:
1944:
1940:
1914:
1888:— Preceding
1885:
1810:edit warring
1773:— Preceding
1754:
1739:
1736:
1733:
1730:
1727:
1724:
1696:Usedtobecool
1694:
1692:
1670:— Preceding
1666:
1649:
1646:
1643:
1640:
1637:
1634:
1601:
1598:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1586:
1562:
1559:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1547:
1519:
1516:
1513:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1484:
1418:— Preceding
1416:Ajax draft
1415:
1337:Thank you --
1287:
1203:— Preceding
1200:
1197:
1194:
1185:
1178:
1133:Usedtobecool
1117:Usedtobecool
1115:
1113:
1045:Usedtobecool
1043:
1041:
920:The Irishman
919:
867:The Irishman
865:
760:write to him
753:
678:— Preceding
675:
672:
668:
665:
662:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
623:Rakesh Sethi
573:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
523:— Preceding
520:
460:— Preceding
457:
437:
414:
410:Regular Show
408:
390:Usedtobecool
388:
386:
383:WikiProjects
361:
343:
318:
300:
273:
203:
174:— Preceding
170:
167:
116:— Preceding
113:
102:Archive 1025
94:Archive 1021
89:Archive 1020
83:Archive 1019
82:
77:Archive 1018
72:Archive 1017
64:Archive 1015
47:
41:
3268:WP:TUTORIAL
3099:WP:REFBEGIN
2853:MOS:COMMENT
2210:PrimeHunter
2031:Ian.thomson
1866:David notMD
1751:I need help
1613:David notMD
1569:REDMAN 2019
1533:REDMAN 2019
1486:REDMAN 2019
1456:like this:
1444:REDMAN 2019
1424:REDMAN 2019
1242:Scatterjoel
728:WP:REFBEGIN
609:David notMD
413:. Or maybe
40:This is an
3351:Allow me:
3299:Darwin Naz
3239:Nick Moyes
3108:Nick Moyes
3011:References
2682:Nick Moyes
2670:ITLRosanna
2623:ITLRosanna
2598:Nick Moyes
2583:HalfShadow
2557:HalfShadow
2498:HalfShadow
2358:WP:PRIMARY
2077:Nick Moyes
2021:Also, our
1882:AccessDate
1463:Nick Moyes
1412:Ajax draft
861:he replied
736:Nick Moyes
603:The draft
252:WP:COISELF
247:WP:PRIMARY
150:Nick Moyes
3276:RudolfRed
2645:NOINDEXed
2527:Oh no, I
2523:RudolfRed
2508:RudolfRed
2474:Vandals,
2452:Marchjuly
2440:WP:BLPSPS
2416:secondary
2384:Marchjuly
2366:Marchjuly
2346:secondary
2284:ColinFine
2266:ColinFine
2046:Jojo Pada
2006:Jojo Pada
1985:Jojo Pada
1923:ColinFine
1837:consensus
1145:Mazewaxie
1078:Mazewaxie
1040:Regards!
1002:Mazewaxie
954:Mazewaxie
928:Mazewaxie
922:talk page
874:Mazewaxie
830:Mazewaxie
798:Mazewaxie
774:Mazewaxie
712:like this
708:like this
441:Bill cage
407:That is,
379:Bill cage
365:Bill cage
337:Bill cage
321:Bill cage
292:Bill cage
277:Bill cage
256:Marchjuly
226:Courtlisa
180:Courtlisa
22:Questions
3341:contribs
3333:Slapper1
3329:unsigned
3219:contribs
3207:unsigned
3142:contribs
3130:unsigned
3079:contribs
3067:unsigned
2930:contribs
2918:unsigned
2810:contribs
2798:unsigned
2774:contribs
2762:unsigned
2350:WP:UNDUE
2343:reliable
2235:Question
1993:contribs
1981:unsigned
1945:Thanks!
1902:contribs
1890:unsigned
1787:contribs
1775:unsigned
1672:unsigned
1448:(Please
1442:Herllo,
1432:contribs
1420:unsigned
1217:contribs
1205:unsigned
1158:contribs
1139:WP:STICK
1109:WP:STICK
1091:contribs
967:contribs
941:contribs
887:contribs
843:contribs
787:contribs
768:fuck off
692:contribs
680:unsigned
537:contribs
525:unsigned
474:contribs
462:unsigned
188:contribs
176:unsigned
130:contribs
118:unsigned
20: |
3361:Yunshui
3089:Hello,
3007:PeterB
2857:WP:RFPP
2539:don't.
2252:Hello,
2229:Preface
1958:Maproom
1919:LINKROT
1909:Hello,
1386:Uw-nor4
1376:Uw-nor3
1366:Uw-nor2
1356:Uw-nor1
1062:, like
764:asshole
702:Hello,
488:on the
296:notable
43:archive
2889:331dot
2851:, see
2839:- talk
2738:": -->
2735:": -->
2733:Tricia
2730:": -->
2710:": -->
2641:WP:NPP
2547:Shadow
2529:always
2486:Shadow
2448:WP:BLP
2444:WP:BLP
2432:WP:SYS
2428:WP:NOR
2382:Howdy
2362:WP:VNT
2354:WP:NOR
2322:WP:RGW
2282:Howdy
2151:- talk
2058:. But
1911:Canute
1894:Canute
1845:Drm310
1454:tildes
1393:Drm310
1329:- talk
1102:WP:AGF
913:331dot
898:331dot
855:331dot
822:331dot
807:331dot
507:- talk
208:WP:COI
3253:Hello
2533:there
210:. --
16:<
3337:talk
3303:talk
3280:talk
3270:and
3243:talk
3215:talk
3160:and
3138:talk
3112:talk
3075:talk
3001:talk
2969:talk
2954:talk
2926:talk
2893:talk
2847:(ec)
2834:Alex
2832:Oxon
2806:talk
2770:talk
2756:talk
2726:talk
2686:talk
2653:talk
2627:talk
2602:talk
2555:Hey
2542:Half
2537:bots
2512:talk
2481:Half
2456:talk
2438:and
2430:and
2406:talk
2370:talk
2360:and
2304:talk
2296:wiki
2290:and
2270:talk
2243:talk
2214:talk
2191:talk
2169:talk
2146:Alex
2144:Oxon
2120:talk
2081:talk
2060:only
2035:talk
1989:talk
1962:talk
1956:.
1927:talk
1898:talk
1870:talk
1852:talk
1843:. --
1783:talk
1766:talk
1680:talk
1617:talk
1573:talk
1537:talk
1490:talk
1467:talk
1458:~~~~
1428:talk
1400:talk
1381:and
1343:talk
1324:Alex
1322:Oxon
1302:talk
1213:talk
1152:talk
1085:talk
983:talk
961:talk
935:talk
902:talk
881:talk
837:talk
811:talk
781:talk
756:here
740:talk
688:talk
613:talk
595:talk
533:talk
502:Alex
500:Oxon
470:talk
445:talk
369:talk
325:talk
281:talk
260:talk
242:here
216:talk
184:talk
154:talk
126:talk
3152:Hi
2827:~~
2316:Hi
2258:one
2200:Hi
2139:~~
2029:).
1709:Hi
1317:~~
547:Hi
495:~~
351:) (
308:) (
290:Hi
224:Hi
3355:,
3343:)
3339:•
3305:)
3282:)
3259:me
3245:)
3221:)
3217:•
3144:)
3140:•
3114:)
3081:)
3077:•
3050:——
3003:)
2993:ss
2991:Je
2971:)
2956:)
2932:)
2928:•
2914:.
2895:)
2825:.
2812:)
2808:•
2776:)
2772:•
2728:)
2688:)
2655:)
2629:)
2604:)
2514:)
2458:)
2408:)
2372:)
2306:)
2272:)
2245:)
2216:)
2208:.
2193:)
2171:)
2122:)
2083:)
2037:)
1995:)
1991:•
1964:)
1929:)
1900:•
1872:)
1864:.
1854:)
1848:🍁
1789:)
1785:•
1768:)
1682:)
1619:)
1469:)
1460:.)
1434:)
1430:•
1402:)
1396:🍁
1389:}}
1383:{{
1379:}}
1373:{{
1371:,
1369:}}
1363:{{
1361:,
1359:}}
1353:{{
1345:)
1315:)
1304:)
1296:--
1271:——
1246:——
1229:——
1219:)
1215:•
1161:)
1155:•
1094:)
1088:•
985:)
970:)
964:•
944:)
938:•
904:)
890:)
884:•
846:)
840:•
813:)
790:)
784:•
742:)
694:)
690:•
615:)
597:)
539:)
535:•
476:)
472:•
447:)
428:——
426:.
385:.
371:)
355:)
327:)
312:)
283:)
262:)
218:)
204:do
190:)
186:•
156:)
132:)
128:•
98:→
68:←
3367:水
3335:(
3301:(
3278:(
3241:(
3213:(
3183:s
3180:r
3177:i
3174:f
3171:b
3168:D
3136:(
3110:(
3073:(
3039:)
3035:(
3026:)
3022:(
2999:(
2967:(
2952:(
2924:(
2891:(
2873:✨
2804:(
2768:(
2754:(
2724:(
2684:(
2666:)
2662:(
2651:(
2625:(
2600:(
2585::
2581:@
2569:G
2566:M
2563:G
2525::
2521:@
2510:(
2500::
2496:@
2454:(
2404:(
2368:(
2356:,
2302:(
2268:(
2241:(
2212:(
2189:(
2167:(
2118:(
2079:(
2048::
2044:@
2033:(
2008::
2004:@
1987:(
1960:(
1925:(
1896:(
1868:(
1850:(
1820:.
1799::
1795:@
1781:(
1764:(
1740:s
1737:r
1734:i
1731:f
1728:b
1725:D
1701:✨
1678:(
1650:s
1647:r
1644:i
1641:f
1638:b
1635:D
1615:(
1602:s
1599:r
1596:i
1593:f
1590:b
1587:D
1571:(
1563:s
1560:r
1557:i
1554:f
1551:b
1548:D
1535:(
1520:s
1517:r
1514:i
1511:f
1508:b
1505:D
1488:(
1465:(
1426:(
1398:(
1341:(
1300:(
1266::
1262:@
1211:(
1149:(
1135::
1131:@
1122:✨
1082:(
1050:✨
981:(
958:(
932:(
915::
911:@
900:(
878:(
857::
853:@
834:(
824::
820:@
809:(
778:(
738:(
686:(
644:s
641:r
638:i
635:f
632:b
629:D
611:(
593:(
574:s
571:r
568:i
565:f
562:b
559:D
531:(
468:(
443:(
395:✨
367:(
347:(
339::
335:@
323:(
304:(
279:(
258:(
214:(
182:(
152:(
145::
141:@
124:(
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.