3240:
published the results of a poll, it MAY be appropriate to say "On
October 31, 2007, Newsweek and The New York Times published the results of a poll that indicated that 71% of U.S. citizens disagree with the Bush Adminsitration on this issue". The key is to report FACTS and CITE SOURCES. Saying "XXXXX reports the results of poll YYYYYY is" is the best way to handle this. Even saying "polls indicate that the majority of American's think..." and then include an inline cite to the specific polls may be OK too, but I like the first form better. What is inappropriate is to say "Americans disagree with the adminsitration" without providing the context and source of this statement. Being transparent in your sources, and being clear that opinions and statistics COME FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE, and that what Knowledge (XXG) does is simply report WHOSE opinion or statistic it is, but that Knowledge (XXG) also needs to remain
2137:| | | | | | | | | | Infobox | | Large blank space | | | | | | |___________________| | <-- Side of the screen _________________________________________________________ | | Cleanup templates | | | | | |_______________________________________________________| | Article text |
3561:
negligence is original research, plain and simple. As a loose example of what I'm taking about, I cite commercials on satellite TV. These people don't ever give me the right times for the shows I wish to see, because they assume I live on the East coast in the United states. It's up to me to straighten that discrepancy out, not complain to them to cater to me. (Having a guide helps, of course, but that's beside the point.) To summarize, just because your specific geographical location doesn't follow the same seasonal pattern as the region to which the claim applies does not make the claim wrong. It just means you need to remember where the claim is being made and how that correlates to you. —
2181:| | <-- Side of the screen _________________________________________________________________ | | Cleanup templates || | || |________________________________________________________________|| | | | | | | Article text | Infobox | | | | | |___________________| |
1875:, and am a crewmember of that ship. I'll admit that I haven't added all too much to it, and there's much more that could be done with it. But I keep it up-to-date with all the current information of the command and a brief overview of its operations. Currently the page is rated poorly because of the lack of citations. But when I update the article to reflect that CDR Paul Savage is the commanding officer I don't use a citation. I don't need one. He's my boss, of course I know who the commanding officer is. I know what awards we receive, what operations we're on. I know this because I'm on the ship every day. How am I supposed to reflect this for Knowledge (XXG) citations?
2322:
may not even be viewing the page and they are using a screen reader or a tactile display. These output devices present the information in a linear fashion, starting at the top and working down, so by placing the tag below the infobox, information in the article is presented (that in the infobox), then you get the message, and then the lead section. This confuses the article message and the article content as the message is in the middle of the content, so the message should be placed before content. A good way to find out the linear layout of a page is to view it without any style applied. The
3602:
was a new storage device a fraction of the size of a cd. If the press release said its dimensions were 4 inches by 4 inches, a change to metric would be acceptable. Let me reiterate, there is no original research when you're changing a season to the months. There's just a simple conversion of measuring systems. When it comes to timezones, there is no alternative measurement for a worldwide time, there is only location specific. For anyone in the southern hemisphere the information IS false, as it is not coming out at the time stipulated in the article. It comes out 6 months before (or after).
3527:. Most of the time these companies say "Fall 2007" or whatever because the definition of "Fall" is rather flexible. We don't know that it will be released before the end of the "official" season, so all we can verifiably say is what the company announced. It might be helpful to note that this is in reference to the Northern hemisphere season rather than the southern, but we really don't want to tread too far into OR for figuring out what the company intends to do with the release. --
3056:
five days now. I complained as frequently as I dared. I finally notified
Blueboar that because of the incvility, sarcasm, assumptions of bad faith that were going unchecked I could no longer continue responding on the article talk page. At that point (yesterday) Blueboar issued on lukewarm suggestion to PalacaGuard008 that he lower the sarcasm level, and PalaceGuard008 apologized on my page but blamed his behavior on the frustration he says I caused.
2002:
also encyclopedic information that's reasonable to include in such an article, I'd say, while the awards section is seen in a number of other articles about past and current US Navy vessels. While I agree that sources should be cited for the assertations of fact (perhaps the Navy's website or the Groton base newspaper would have such references?), I don't see anything wrong with the
2010:
military. That said, as people pointed out, Knowledge (XXG) policy recommends that primary sources (such as personal knowledge from being a member of the crew) be avoided when possible. While you may use them to help identify notable things that can be added to the article to improve it, you need to find a way to back up the claims with independantly
1389:. Caroig could help with that reorganisation, or otherwise, most likely, the Knowledge (XXG) community could decide to dunk the geobox2 system. If Caroig's intention was to create a bot-like application, which he seems to suggest ("... machine-parseable ...") he should seek permission via the procedures explained at
3788:
I never said anything about TV seasons, you did. Look, I'm not going to argue with you because you're clearly not getting it. Plus, I think I asked this question in the wrong place, can anyone tell me where I should put this as a policy proposal and what I should do to get it there? I'm not very good
3741:
No, it's not original research. Look, that season corresponds to a certain set of dates depending on where the product is released. It's not ambiguous because there is a set time frame for the season to occur. Hence, it's merely converting between one measuring system and another. Plan and Simple. So
3581:
I don't see how its relying on false information or its misleading. Usually, something being "released in spring 2009" will note where its being released (such as movies or DVDs). For worldwide releases, common sense would dictate that spring 2009 would refer to the spring in the company's country.
3109:
As you know, Knowledge (XXG)'s image policy requires that images be usable in commercial contexts. Many images in
Knowledge (XXG) (and the Commons for that matter) are copied from Flickr under CC licensing. If any of these contain images of individuals, there could be legal problems if those images
3055:
talk page. Since then I have been the object of continue incivility, snide remarks, sarcasm, and accusation of bad faith on the part of PalaceGuard008 to the point that I can no longer participate in the discussion. My pleas for civility and Assume Good Faith were ignored. This has been going on for
2403:? If an editor reverted your edits, then I would check in their edit summary for the reasoning behind their edit. Most of the time, the editor in question will leave a note on your talk page explaining the reason for their revert. If they did not, then feel free to leave a message on their talk page.
2321:
I think that the placement of these temporary messages (whether for cleanup, tone, refs, current event etc) should take into account the structure of the article, rather than the visual appearance, as not everyone views pages in the same skin, or they have their own style or no style applied, or they
2244:
Okay, I did a little more testing and the issue is browser dependent. On
Firefox, the template is compressed to fit next to the infobox if you put it below and there is not a huge difference between above and below. On Internet Explorer (at least IE7) it is not compressed and if it cannot fit next to
3601:
The difference between timezones and seasonal zones is that while seasons may vary, months do not. Hence having something say "released in spring 2009" when referring to the southern hemisphere, the months are clear cut - September
October November, and so are not original research. Just as if there
3239:
may be valid to add to articles. For example, if Bush
Administrations official position on the Kyoto Protocol is published in reliable sources, CITE THOSE SOURCES, and then put the position in the article (it is QUITE noteworthy and hevaily covered). Likewise, if the New York Times or Newsweek has
3105:
The above article addresses an issue that, it seems to me, may affect
Knowledge (XXG). In the case described, a Texas teenager is suing an Australian company that used a CC-licensed image of her, placed on Flickr by the photographer, in an advertisement. The teenager's rights to her own image were
2793:
but that was a few months ago. Also, there is a pending software change that may help make
Newpage patrol more efficient. When Wikimedia next updates our version of MediaWiki it will probably be tested first, possibly on the German Knowledge (XXG). After the 1 anon article month test is over and the
2205:
I hate to take the, um, sane perspective on this issue, but if the article is in need of clean-up ANYWAYS, then wouldn't the entire problem be solved by actually fixing the problems noted in the clean-up template? If the article is already "ugly" and in dire need of some form of clean-up, than does
2001:
I'd say that the content of that article is entirely reasonable stuff to include in an article on the boat; it covers her basic history (construction and commissioning date, plankowner CO, homeport, her one major refit period, last deployment, and current operations); the current CO, XO, and COB are
1762:
Both have received objections by some users. The former doesn't present the information on the same page, while the later can result in an unwieldy list that can appear on all of the associated pages. Either seems preferable to independently maintaining the same list on a multitude of pages. Thanks.
1463:
is, where and how it is used, read the debates on its talk page before suggesting it should be ditched and stating the intention is to create a bot-like application? I really don't know what might have led to this conclusion. If you feel there's something wrong with the categorization of the various
3764:
No, it's not the same as converting a unit of measure to another. TV seasons are specific and do not change in different climates. Additionally, converting to months is original research, because you are guessing about what months the compan meant when they could just be ballparking for the sake of
3695:
It is not deliberately "left wide" as they list the release as in a certain quarter of the year. Just as if they'd said they were to release their product in
October 2006, you'd know that the release would be between October 1st and October 31st, 2006. The difference between the example I just gave
2685:
Oops, you're right, someone on another page just explained it to me. Oh well, at least now I understand why pages are so full of "irrelevant" date wikilinks. But I do think the reason could be made a little more clear on the guideline page. Perhaps I'll have a crack at clarifying it myself sometime
2372:
When a contribution is deleted without the deletor and/or wikipedia staff even having the courtesy to contact the contributor and debate the significance, where does the contributor go to debate the significance of the contribution? Especially if the contributor is above average sure the deleter is
2170:
That's not true at all (but I'm impressed with your drawing). I also disagree with your concept of high and low as I have both at the house and it does not leave a large blank space on lower resolution, what it does is leave a large area where you only see the tag clean up or otherwise. Borrowing
2049:
but do not specify if that top should be visual or literal. Putting the tag below the infobox on the edit page visually puts the tag at the top of the article, per guidelines, and side by side with the info box. It's visually pleasing and does not throw off the page orientation. The issue is, is
1828:
I am not sure I understand why we are including references to articles that aren't actually used in those articles? Let me get this straight. You read a book. You put information from that book into an article. You cite that reference. How does a reference that you don't read and that does not
1194:
which shows up. Caroig said he didn't find any official policy saying that such categories in the article namespace are prohibited. I asked him to alter the Geobox code but he don't want to do that. I can't recall any
Infobox which have such categories in article namespace. Caroig insists it is the
3691:
No, because they left a narrow scope of when it is going to be released. I'm sure that the vast majority of people in the USA know that spring does not last 9 months. Seasons do not have a random element where summer starts in June in 2006 and in December in 2008. There is a reference point, where
3497:
Frequently I see articles that say things like "will be released spring 2009". This may be useful for people in the northern hemisphere, but it's a bit more complicated for us here in the southern. Any chance we could put in a policy stating that release dates should be according to the quarter of
3179:
This entire subject should be much more interesting to Commons than Knowledge (XXG). Commons is, in part, a free content replacement for commercial stock archives. Many stock images come with rights releases, but by no means do all of them, and you will pretty much never find an image of a famous
3171:
In the US (I limit myself to the US only because I know the law in the US the best) the only use class substantially limited by publicity rights is the right to use an identifiable image of a person to promote something. Like trademarks, you can think of this as a kind of anti-fraud law: You can't
2759:
No, I didn't, but I missed the point that it makes no sense to restrict registered users if anons have no such restriction. So I'll wait to see how the experiment turns out, and if anons are subsequently (again) prevented from creating new articles, I'll try to remember to bring this up again. --
2630:
deepen readers' understanding of a particular topic? Day pages are by definition a hodge-podge of information about things that happened on that particular day in history, how could this information ever be relevant to a particular topic? I would submit, almost never, so such day-date pages should
3669:
It is, actually, because you're assuming you know what the company means, when in fact you do not. They give vague dates for the express reason that they themselves are not aware of when exactly they'll be releasing it. To convert their vagueness is original research, because you're attempting to
3218:
Therefore ,would it not be better to speak of administrations or governements? Examples: The Bush administration rejects the Kyoto Protocol, while I know of poles which indicate that most american citizens are in favour on ratifying it. America boycots Cuba: I have seen reports on various forums
2526:
you have to be careful not to step over the line between that and copying. Also, a line drawing like that is usually not a useful image. We often have a discussion about that for images of famous people, but the same reasoning would apply for pictures of animals, plants, products, scenes, etc.
2521:
Here comes the probable answer. If you're copying a line drawing, or creating one by tracing or reproducing an existing image, that is a copy for copyright purposes and would be subject to the same infringement / Knowledge (XXG) use analysis as any other copy. In other words, it doesn't buy you
2076:
is purposely subjective, and it should be an editor's choice. The only reason I could see putting them before the infobox would be to make them more easily found for removal, any dummy can just scroll down to find the tags. I actually think the difference should be made clear in the guidelines as
3586:
stated, its up to the reader to correlate that info to you. Its no more false than articles that notes a certain TV show airs Wednesdays at 9. I know that's Eastern time and I must subtract an hour to correlate it to myself. If we were to turn it around and try to decide which range of months
2326:
guideline provides some layout examples on this. This layout also provides a visual separation between the message and content, showing that the message applies to the infobox content as well, and doesn't mix the two together. Any issues with the visual appearance should be addressed so that the
2009:
Divsky, thank you for serving our country; as someone who knows (not from personal experience, mind you, but from a lifelong fascination) what the two kinds of ships in the ocean are, I particularly want to thank you for going into the Silent Service; it's arguably the hardest life in the entire
3175:
Asking if Knowledge (XXG) content is restricted to being used in those ways is missing the point, somewhat. Knowledge (XXG) is not. True, but nothing about Knowledge (XXG)'s licensing terms forbids you from somehow using Knowledge (XXG) to commit murder, for example. Yet committing murder using
2044:
I was instructed to take this thought process here. Going from a visual POV, when talking to people I was told to put clean up tags under the infobox templates. It would still place the tag at the top of the article, per guidelines, but it wouldn't throw off the orientation of the pages. The
3560:
Actually, it is not false, because companies do not bother taking anything but their primary distribution point into consideration when making these claims. That it does not apply to you specifically is not their problem, nor Knowledge (XXG)'s for that matter. To attempt to correct for their
3293:. It may well be that some Knowledge (XXG) users are associated with this site and are behind mass adding of links to articles. I consider the site inappropriate to link to as it usually has a lot less information than can be expected in a featured article which is one of the requirements at
1542:
talk page so that the users after whose requests the disputed feature was added can have their say. Dealing with the topic here, behind everyone's back, is not a good practice either on Knowledge (XXG) or in discussions anywhere generally. So please put your further comment just there. –
2420:
Discussions about contributions to an article usually take place on the Talk page of the article. There are exceptions, such as if the topic belongs in another article or just not here. Check the History of the article to see if an editor put comments there during the change.
1385:) and for the templates that generate names of "geobox" category names I don't know: either the Knowledge (XXG) community decides to ge rid of the system, either they should be renamed/re-organised/rewritten in a vein to separate main namespace content and other content per
1271:"Geobox" is a kind of self-reference: the word "Geobox" is relevant for those building the encyclopedia, but it has virtually no relevance in the general categorisation schemes for main namespace articles, e.g. it's not as if this category would belong in any subcategory of
3537:
It's not that hard to say the range of months then. Otherwise wikipedia is relaying false information (because for the southern hemisphere, that information IS false. If we're allowing the "release in fall 2009", we may as well let any misleading information on wikipedia.
3273:
edit when it is wrong. But note for your example the USA boycott may by a policy of one administration, but it is action of the country, so it is correct to say the country has whatever rules in place. One could add that citizens may not like this (if there are sources)
3692:
the season related to the three months that the season corresponds to from the location of the company, is that reference point. If it were not the case, no one would know what months the seasons would be in and the notion of regular fixed seasons would be meaningless.
2128:
I would say to put it before the infobox. For people using a high resolution monitor, it won't really matter, but for people using lower resolution (not very wide) monitors, putting the templates under the infobox will lead to pages looking something like
2111:
the problem that caused this has since been solved, but it may explain why some pages might still say that cleanup tags should always be put before infoboxes. In general, I fully agree that the proper answer is the one given by Atropos: whatever works.
1905:. You are a primary source, thus can't be used as a reference here. Surely there is documentation somewhere. I'm sure a base newspaper would have an article on a change of command for the boat. Certainly orders were posted under a document number. --
3180:
person with a rights release in a stock archive (although there will be many images of famous people...). For this reason it would be useful if commons would collect releases for some images to improve their parity with the commercial stock galleries. --
2709:. Currently, a person can register at Knowledge (XXG) and immediately create an article. Such a new editor, however, cannot move pages or edit semi-protected pages until becoming "autoconfirmed", which currently requires a four-day waiting period. (See
2352:
Z-Man, thank you. Yes, I use Firefox (it helps with the spelling). So I was not seeing the big white space you described. Now that I see it, I agree and understand. I was going by Firefox so I didn't see that big white gap. Thanks for the research.
2106:
were recently standardized, the early versions of the standard layout broke very badly in some browsers if they were placed beside any floating elements (such as infoboxes). The workaround, of course, being to place them before the infobox instead. I
1442:
Omission of parent category fixed. There is no indication of an active bot so WP:BOTS is not relevant; machine-parseable has other meanings such as Google being able to recognize data. Are there issues other than the category structure or naming?
2851:
However, please remember that by removing the warning, it is considered that you have read and understood it. Carnildo is correct though, you can remove any message you wish from your talk page, including notices of warnings, blocks, etc. It is
3380:. There are some extremely talented researchers and bot operators over there who are experts at gathering data and sorting out issues exactly like this one. And, if necessary, they excel at cleaning up links and blacklisting sites as well. --
3742:
saying "spring 2009" about a product being released in Melbourne, Australia would be converted to "September - November 2009", because those are the months that Spring in Melbourne fall. It's the same as converting from faranheit to celcius.
1967:- the goal of Knowledge (XXG) isn't to collect all the information in the world, it's to be an encyclopedia. What's interesting to you, other crew members, families of crew members, and former members of the crew may never be published in a
3126:
What you're missing is that publicity rights are not a part of copyright, and they are not an inherent part of commercial use. There are many commercial uses for images (say, news reporting) that don't require a publicity rights release.
1607:
is not a good base to suggest ditching a template, which is just one more and versatile Infobox. If there's something that's not clear it's a good practice to ask and check the issue first before jumping to such far-fetched conclusions. –
2831:
I was a little confused, and wondered if someone could clarify what is and is not acceptable. If an admin makes comments on your talk page, ie. warnings, blocks, etc - is it acceptable to remove these comments, rather than archiving
1806:
I don't like the idea of included irrelevant references on an article; those are not references to that article. Are these references likely to change? If not, then, I would just copy and paste the references into each article.
1941:
Thank you for serving our country, that's a wonderful thing for you to do. However, being a member of the crew doesn't count as source. I found that out the hard way with a different article. Again, thank you for your service. .
3721:
Still, they do not say quarters when giving these dates, and this fact is something you keep missing. They say Fall, we say Fall. We don't say quarters because they don't. Plain and simple. What you argue is original research. —
3050:
A couple of threads above, I asked a question about correct sources, as did PalaceGuard008 in the thread following. Blueboar offered to mediate and I put a great deal of work into formulating my "Issues". This occurred on the
2050:
it MANDITORY that the tag throws off the page and makes the articles look bad, or is it acceptable for the tag to go below the info box in the edit mode aligning it at the top of the article with the top of the info box?
2188:
page. With a widescreen, you don't see any article when the tag is at the top. When it's put below the info box it lands side by side with the infobox but doesn't interfere with the article and there is no blank space.
3297:. I believe having a template for this site just encourages some people to link to it as they think somehow that Knowledge (XXG) is endorsing the link by having a template - I would appreciate people's comments on the
2594:
Stand alone months and days of the week should generally not be linked. Stand alone years do not need to be linked but some users prefer it, and some users prefer to link (with a piped link) to articles formatted as
1496:, and an editor brings it to the attention here at VPP, there's nothing wrong with discussing it here. I keep my part of the discussion here, while I think the issue broader than the categorisation included in the
2620:
Knowledge (XXG) has articles on days of the year, years, decades, centuries and millennia. As a general rule of thumb, link to one of these pages only if it is likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic.
2548:, then synthesizing illustrations from a couple of them would not, in my opinion, be a problem. Still, taking pictures for illustrations would seem to avoid any possible doubts about copyright infringement. --
1408:
are not part of the picture of those who should be able to easily recognise page names. So, yes, currently Caroig's approach is in conflict with a host of policies & guidelines: thus far I named the policies
3627:
On the contrary, the months are not clear cut. Who is to say that "Spring 2009" in the southern hemisphere means "September, October, November" and not "October November December" or even "Sept 21 - Dec. 21"?
1527:
so it's odd claim the discussion wasn't leading anywhere. While some reasoning was given in the reply, those who object to this feature didn't state their reasons clearly at all, what should any one make of:
1837:
section. If the reference is entirely unrelated to the article in question, don't include it. What is the specific problem we are trying to fix with these random "other pages" or "templates" or whatever?
2527:
Better just to get a camera and take a picture, or find someone who has. The exception might be a map, chart, or diagram, where you need to create a new free work based on an existing copyrighted work.
1662:
These settlements are already properly categorized. Per common sense and also some policies (see above) there is no need for such categories although user who created them argues they are needed, because
2206:
the addition of the template REALLY detract that much from the article, regardless of where it is placed? And if the template looks ugly, why not just fix the article so the template can be removed?--
2478:
I was wondering if it would be possible for me to draw simple line illustrations as seen from a book and be able to use them as images for my article without breaking copyright laws. My article is
1833:
section. If the article does not directly cite a reference, but the work in question contains information that could likely be cited, or which is closely related to the article, include it in the
2985:, with which I heartily disagree, and partly to give form to the "How to win a content dispute" essay I've been thinking for months about writing. I welcome any feedback or improvements. Cheers. -
2544:
If the illustrations in a book are unique to that book, then modifications of them are still problematical. On the other hand, if there are dozens of books that show illustrations of the same
1704:
1517:
50:
2090:
3298:
2626:
The guideline states that one should only link to days of the year "if it is likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic" - but in what way could linking to individual days
1971:(using primary sources, such as published orders, is controversial); if not, then Knowledge (XXG) isn't the right place to post it - a blog, or a personal webpage, are better. --
1253:
Actually what is that led you to state I behave as if I own the template? Because I asked a user who suggested something to support his statement with more detailed arguments? –
1829:
contain any information get into a list of references for a particular article anyways? This is confusing to me. If the article uses or cites the reference, include it in the
2774:
If the experiment produces the result that I am anticipating, this proposal may receive a boost in popularity. Imminent changes notwithstanding, I would support this proposal.
1349:
appears to be the "root" category of this categorisation system. There is no supercategory defined for that category. In other words, this category scheme does not resolve to
3406:
2931:
Linking to external attacks or harassment for the purpose of attacking another editor is regarded as a personal attack and faces the same restrictions as an on-wiki attack.
2667:, I see "2001-07-08". Linking to an absolutely-specific-day is generally not done, except where that day is itself notable (I'm assuming there's a 2001-09-11 article).
1685:
2978:
1210:
doesn't exist (it is a redlink currently). You should be able to remove a non-existing category from a template that is intended to be used in the main namespace, per
3402:
3363:
I can't imagine a more clearcut example of mass link farming for commercial purposes as this. I wish more people would weigh in on this so that the members with a
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
2660:
That bit isn't actually ambiguous, it does mean always linking them - date formatting preferences only kick in when the date is wikilinked. I type ] ], you see
1291:
in no time. After its removal we're back at the first step above for removing the category name from any template that is intended to be used in main namespace.
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
3639:
You misunderstand me. January is January wherever you go in the world. Hence, a simple conversion from the location of the press release is not unreasonable.
2842:
Yes. Archiving is preferred, but there's no rule preventing you from simply removing them. Warnings are meant as communication, not as a badge of shame. --
2881:
in light of recent disagreements between administrators over how to apply the policy and the conditions under which an administrator may unblock a user. -
1280:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
371:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
1195:
same as categories regarding cleanup or wikification but I suppose it is not. Can you point me to proper policy or advise what to do, please? Thank you. -
2631:
almost never be linked, but in practice people seem to be linking them all the time. So this policy appears to be inconsistent with current practice.
1520:(which is currently: "rename" if the proponents of the system are willing to collaborate towards an appropriate renaming scheme, otherwise: "delete")
2438:
1377:
would probably be preferred (as suggested below) - then, yes one would need to list each proposed merger/renaming for such categories as part of the
67:
2017:
Thanks again for helping defend the country--AND for being smart enough to ask for advice on this issue; it's much better to ask than to editwar!
3212:
Numerous articles in Wiki talk about countries having wishes, demands and such. I feel this hardly ever the case. It is usually a pars pro toto.
2328:
3847:
In terms of periods of time and usually in past-tense. Television goes by defined seasons: summer line-up, fall schedule, winter specials, etc.
2442:
2327:
non-visual appearance is still logical and understandable by non-visual users, and the best place to discuss the visual appearance is probably
3195:
2646:
That would remove the ambiguity. Is this ambiguity perhaps the reason so many people add day-date links to pages, because they think they are
2500:
2073:
2612:
2937:
2743:
45:
40:
3811:
The same would go for you, as both I and other users have said. Style for dates is guideline, not policy, so you should raise the issue at
2388:
2089:. This question should not need to be asked, it simply doesn't matter whether the cleanup tags are above or below the infobox. To quote, "
57:
3215:
I have seen several opinion poles suggesting that the citizens of countries do not agree with their governments, on the issues reported.
3796:
3749:
3706:
3651:
3612:
3545:
3508:
1751:
Is there a standard for handling a set of general references that apply to a large number of pages? The two approaches I've seen are:
3377:
2522:
anything. On the other hand, if you create a drawing based on an impression without actually copying, that is a completely new work
83:
35:
17:
3860:
3824:
3778:
3731:
3679:
3570:
2940:
1628:
The more common format for categories seems to be something like "Category:Knowledge (XXG) Geobox Settlement in Slovakia". See the
1279:, it falls under that guideline. It is also inappropriate to categorise cities as a kind of "box". "Geobox" is also singular, while
3289:
A user has now discovered that nndb uses referral codes in its links to Amazon which generate profit for the site i.e. here on the
1902:
94:
3587:
spring equals, that could be adding false info because that isn't what the source says nor what the company says and would to the
3765:
it. To pick months, no matter how they correspond to any season anywhere in the world, is original research, because the company
3172:
use someone's picture to make it look like they endorse your product when they really don't. It's a very limited class of use.
3019:
Are those fair use? Darn it; you're right. I have removed them, and would welcome the addition of any appropriate free images. -
2923:
2896:
2892:
1161:
3351:
3306:
2710:
1394:
62:
3259:
2217:
1849:
3454:, someone is trying to use dictionary definitions that don't mention highways and apply them to highways. For instance, see
2638:
It's a little ambiguous, because it appears to indicate that such dates "should be linked" at all times. Shouldn't it read "
1665:"I don't think there's a problem having a category indicating the article contains geodata in a machine-parseable format."
1370:
1326:
3033:
I have added my own apostate thoughts to the talk page of your fine essay. I suppose I will be pilloried. Ah, well. --
1211:
3184:
3120:
3052:
3004:
I like your choice of images, but I was under the impression that fair use images cannot by used outside article space.
1890:
1330:
3815:
if a single word bothers you so much. Regardless, it still wouldn't trump needing reliable sources, which is policy. —
2434:
2014:
cited sources. Navy press releases would be an excellent choice, as I believe they're archived on the Navy's website.
1645:
1374:
1298:
3367:
of the site do not get to have their say by default because not enough other people feel like stating their opinion.
1354:
1154:
1393:
before setting up the system. See also the main principle of page naming (also applicable to Category names) at the
1382:
3345:
2323:
1284:
1242:
template, or if this user made that template too complex for anyone else to understand how to edit it, there is a
1207:
1191:
2908:
2227:
Clean up is just an example. There's also tense, citations, etc. Clean up was just the example I chose to use.
1872:
29:
3106:
violated by using it for a commercial purpose without her permission or release (or so her lawyer is arguing).
2766:
2733:
2554:
2509:
2384:
2118:
1977:
1567:
3424:
3176:
Knowledge (XXG) content is still illegal and we do not consider Knowledge (XXG) to be non-free as a result.
1574:
3866:
3792:
3745:
3702:
3647:
3608:
3541:
3504:
2376:
1878:
1369:
and "all" subcategories (without needing to name them individually). For subcategories named (for example)
3800:
3753:
3710:
3655:
3616:
3549:
3512:
3451:
3420:
3338:
3062:
Please, where can I go for help on this? I need some help with being bullied on that article. Thank you.
3007:
2777:
1728:
1493:
1305:
1187:
3696:
and what I'm trying to argue is that months do not change according to what part of the globe you're in.
2790:
2380:
3856:
3820:
3774:
3727:
3675:
3566:
2946:
1587:
1434:
1313:
3592:
86:. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to revive any of these discussions, either
3838:
1366:
1346:
3484:
3382:
2185:
2065:
2051:
1721:
1580:
1536:
1510:
1500:
1468:
1457:
1236:
1183:
3870:
3841:
3828:
3804:
3782:
3757:
3735:
3714:
3683:
3659:
3632:
3620:
3595:
3574:
3553:
3531:
3516:
3487:
3462:
3439:
3432:
3413:
3388:
3371:
3354:
3321:
3309:
3278:
3264:
3229:
3202:
3165:
3140:
3131:
3087:
3070:
3037:
3023:
3014:
2999:
2989:
2967:
2949:
2911:
2885:
2866:
2846:
2836:
2814:
2784:
2769:
2750:
2736:
2690:
2676:
2654:
2573:
2557:
2531:
2512:
2493:
2462:
2449:
2425:
2413:
2392:
2357:
2342:
2316:
2231:
2222:
2193:
2165:
2123:
2097:
2081:
2058:
2025:
1980:
1946:
1928:
1915:
1894:
1854:
1811:
1801:
1784:
1774:
1740:
1711:
1692:
1671:
1656:
1636:
1617:
1590:
1576:, the content of which reads: "This is an auto-generated category of all (...) that make use of the
1552:
1483:
1447:
1437:
1341:
1316:
1272:
1262:
1199:
1168:
3162:
2833:
2762:
2747:
2729:
2550:
2528:
2505:
2499:
You'll probably get an answer here, but there is a page that specializes in this type of question:
2332:
2264:
2254:
2113:
1973:
1908:
1358:
1350:
3848:
3834:
2742:
I take it you missed the announcement that anons will be given back the ability to create pages?
2400:
2284:
2274:
3253:
2861:
2802:
2636:
Dates when they contain a day, month, and year...should be linked for date preference formatting.
2405:
2304:
2211:
2153:
2145:
If the infobox is very large, the blank space on top of the article would be very large as well.
1882:
1843:
1780:
If the references are relevant to the articles, the "unwieldy list" belongs on those articles. (
3477:
3317:
Checking the transclusions, there doesn't seem to be an "mass adding of links" as you indicate.
2982:
2720:, so that the newly registered editors would have to wait four days before creating an article?
1430:
2069:
1516:
talk page), and broader than that template over-all. Of course I also expressed my opinion on
3812:
3270:
3241:
1560:
1414:
1390:
3852:
3816:
3770:
3723:
3671:
3583:
3562:
3428:
3376:
I agree this appears to be inappropriate linkspamming. My suggestion is to post a notice at
2943:
2446:
2354:
2339:
2228:
2190:
2055:
1943:
1925:
1886:
1795:
1768:
1736:
1613:
1548:
1524:
1479:
1258:
3588:
3364:
3077:
2878:
2706:
2455:
2103:
2086:
1964:
1426:
1422:
1410:
1386:
1378:
1334:
1288:
1276:
1243:
1218:
3481:
2672:
3524:
3294:
3245:
3236:
2995:
Totally agree and well argued. There is never a need to use any sort of derogatory term.
1968:
1418:
3099:
2936:
It is intended to reflect the current consensus on such issues. Comments are welcome at
2727:
pages, is separate, and would remain as is, available immediately upon registering.) --
2054:
being an example of how the Soap Project participants have been instructed. Thank you.
3473:
3199:
3194:
A discussion about changing the COI guideline to improve expert retention has begun at
3020:
2986:
2882:
2687:
2651:
1165:
2011:
3629:
3459:
3436:
3410:
3368:
3249:
3181:
3137:
3128:
3117:
3063:
2964:
2960:
2904:
2843:
2796:
2490:
2486:
2459:
2298:
2207:
2147:
2078:
2022:
2018:
1839:
1808:
1708:
1668:
1338:
1196:
1717:
I would prefer the debate to be placed on just one place, the best one might be the
3318:
3226:
3149:
It's almost important to note that part of her claim is that their use constituted
3034:
2608:
2422:
2094:
1924:
The content could presumably go into the article's talk page until you find a cite.
1781:
1689:
1684:. But that cat doesn't include other coordinate-including articles. Discuss with
1653:
1633:
1444:
1246:
infringement (we're talking about main namespace content here). WP:OWN is policy.
1186:}} template shows up technical categories in all articles which use it, see e.g.
2716:
What do others think about applying the autoconfirm criteria to the function of
2604:
2336:
2064:
I had never thought about the difference, but the after-the-infobox approach in
1791:
1764:
1732:
1609:
1544:
1475:
1254:
1225:
1179:
3047:
If this is not the correct place to ask, please direct me to the correct page.
1518:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_October_25#Geobox_categories
3334:
3275:
3150:
3136:
True, but is Knowledge (XXG) content restricted to being used in those ways?
3081:
2668:
2545:
2479:
2021:
12:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC) (Edited to correct my mistaking who said what.
3837:
already prefers the avoidance of using seasons to identify periods of time.
3528:
3302:
3158:
2996:
2072:. I believe the phrase "they should be placed at the top of the article" at
3290:
2283:
2273:
2263:
2253:
1275:(which doesn't even exist). Although this specific case isn't mentioned in
2900:
2068:
is much more visually appealing than the before-the-infobox placement in
2897:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Banning policy#Request for comments: Community bans
1162:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Banning policy#Request for comments: Community bans
3153:
by casting her in a poor light. Rights the protect individuals from
2700:
Limit newpage creation to autoconfirmed users to reduce CSD articles?
2661:
2184:
To see what it actually looks like, again, I would direct you to the
1164:
to help clarify our confused policy on banning disruptive editors. -
1586:
template." - "auto-generated" seems to indicate a bot operation. --
3219:
stating that most american citizens are against the Cuban boycot.
3154:
1790:
Less than 100% of the references are relevant to every article. —
1464:
subtemplates or the auto categories, why don't you post it on the
1309:
3401:
I'm having problems with an IP that keeps adding a scroll box to
2572:
There appears to be some inconsistency/ambiguity in this policy.
3330:
3059:
Nothing I did was intentional on my part. I was doing my best.
2705:
About 2000 new articles are deleted every day, most of them via
2664:
1333:. Do you think I should nominate all categories of this kind to
3789:
with this editing of pages, give me some nice phpbb anyday.
3341:, the company that owns both of these websites. You have been
3094:
Creative Commons licensing and individuals' right to publicity
2093:," "some things in this world are more important than others."
1283:
specifies to put (main namespace) categories in plural. So if
2938:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:No personal attacks#A growing agreement?
90:
a new thread or use the talk page associated with that topic.
2171:
your template, or trying this is what I see on both screens.
1325:
There are many such categories created by User:Caroig, e.g.
82:
This page contains discussions that have been archived from
3476:? I was under the impression that you preferred to use a
3196:
Wikipedia_talk:Conflict_of_interest#Scientists_and_Experts
3113:
Is this an issue or is there something I'm missing here?
2922:
There is a proposal to add this text to the policy page,
1402:
majority of English speakers would most easily recognize
3455:
3348:
3342:
3326:
1681:
1629:
87:
3419:
It seems to have been done by at least the following:
2794:
data is collected it will probably be turned on here.
1758:
Create a template with the list of general references.
1363:
Requires this category be defined on the top of a tree
3100:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/ramasastry/20071025.html
2644:...should be linked for date preference formatting."?
2576:
currently states the following re: date wikilinking:
1755:
Add a link to a separate page showing the references.
3769:(get this fact straight) anything but the season. —
2102:
For background, it may be useful to note that, when
1686:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geographical coordinates
3407:
Category:Pre-freeway turnpikes in the United States
1871:I currently maintain the wikipedia article for the
1603:or how a bot can be set up) or that something just
1563:issue, I brought it up based on the content of the
2961:http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/10/31/0328239.shtml
2589:— should be linked for date preference formatting.
1630:list of categories starting with "Knowledge (XXG)"
1355:Knowledge (XXG):Categorization#Browsing categories
3110:are used in a commercial context, per the above.
2723:(Note that the createtalk function, for creating
2581:Dates when they contain a day, month, and year —
2373:wrong and should be forced to debate the issue?
1365:." - my bolding). So it would be possible to CfD
1287:(or any similar) were created it would be up for
1747:General references that apply to multiple pages?
1676:Then the category name should be something like
3403:List of turnpikes in Virginia and West Virginia
1453:Please could you first have a look at what the
1281:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (categories)
3670:narrow down what is deliberately left wide. —
3190:Conflict of Interest guideline change proposed
1381:process. For the "technical" categories (e.g.
2640:When dates containing a day, month, and year
2433:If you refer to pages being deleted then see
1530:I am sure there is something in WP:MOS/WP:CAT
1400:page: "article naming should prefer what the
1308:and similar articles? Compare the article on
8:
3076:Issues like this probably should go over to
2979:Knowledge (XXG):Don't "call a spade a spade"
2686:in the next few days. Thanks for your help.
2439:Knowledge (XXG):Criteria for speedy deletion
1867:The use of citation when I -am- the citation
3498:the year (that is, quarter 1 for Jan-Mar)?
3347:of NNDB links since at least January, 2006
3043:bullied as a result of asking question here
2454:If you want a debate, the correct forum is
2245:the infobox, it will put it below. Compare:
2091:Don't edit war over the colour of templates
2329:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Article message boxes
1707:. Please vote and express your opinion. -
1644:Perhaps the template should be generating
1573:template, used on "geobox" category pages
3458:. Can somebody please help? Thank you. --
3222:Has this issues been adressed somewhere?
2856:that you archive messages, but it is not
2501:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
2074:Knowledge (XXG):Template messages/Cleanup
1652:is there a need for Geobox categories? (
3157:are also a seperate beast entirely from
3078:adminstrator's noticeboard for incidents
2827:removal of admins comments on talk pages
2443:Knowledge (XXG):Why was my page deleted?
1421:, and most notably also the guidelines
3327:You seem to have a particular interest
2482:. I would appreciate any feedback.
2399:Are you referring to your edits being
1678:Articles with geographical coordinates
1595:The lack of understanding (in case of
2877:We are discussing the wording of the
2613:18th century in United States history
1506:template (the topic discussed on the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)
7:
2489:23:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Snap_pea
1903:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
1729:Template talk:Geobox#Auto categories
1532:. The debate rightly belongs to the
1371:Category:Geobox Settlement, Slovakia
1327:Category:Geobox Settlement, Slovakia
3523:Unfortunately, that falls afoul of
3244:on all issues AND avoid presenting
2924:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
2895:? somewhere else? Thanks! I do see
2893:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Banning policy
3493:Release by date rather than season
2711:Knowledge (XXG):User access levels
1395:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions
1331:Category:Geobox Building, Slovakia
24:
3235:such information, if reported in
3093:
3299:deletion debate for the template
1646:Category:Settlements in Slovakia
1375:Category:Settlements in Slovakia
1361:- List of top-level categories.
1212:Knowledge (XXG):Use common sense
2634:Also the first paragraph says "
2435:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy
1523:The debate had only started at
1492:If issues weren't resolving on
3472:Incidentally, am I allowed to
2789:I proposed this once before -
1383:Category:Geobox2 documentation
1312:where that infobox is used. --
1155:Knowledge (XXG):Banning policy
1:
3446:Issues with original research
2891:Do you have a link? Is it on
2324:Knowledge (XXG):Accessibility
2270:IE7, 1920x1200, below infobox
2260:IE7, 1920x1200, above infobox
1682:"Articles with..." categories
78:Village pump (policy) archive
3871:22:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3842:22:45, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3829:01:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
3805:00:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
3783:00:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
3758:22:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3736:22:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3715:17:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3684:16:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3660:15:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3633:15:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3621:11:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3596:09:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3575:08:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3554:00:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
3532:18:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
3517:16:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
3488:04:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
3463:21:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
3440:01:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
3414:01:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
3389:15:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
3372:14:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
3355:10:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
3322:04:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
3310:01:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
3279:20:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
3265:16:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3230:16:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3203:15:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3185:22:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3166:00:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
3141:21:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3132:20:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3121:14:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
3088:14:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
3071:14:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
3053:Caisson (Asian architecture)
3038:06:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
3024:22:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
3015:15:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
3000:10:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2990:06:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2968:03:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
2950:18:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2912:22:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2886:15:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2867:07:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2847:07:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2837:03:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2815:22:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2785:12:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2770:11:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2751:11:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
2737:22:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
2691:15:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
2677:11:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
2655:07:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
2558:15:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
2532:22:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
2513:00:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
2494:23:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2463:16:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
2450:20:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
2426:17:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
2414:17:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
2393:17:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
2358:22:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2343:22:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2335:. Or just fix the articles.
2317:21:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2290:IE7, 1024x768, below infobox
2280:IE7, 1024x768, above infobox
2232:18:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2223:18:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2194:18:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2166:17:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2124:17:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2098:02:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2082:01:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2059:01:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2026:12:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2006:of the article as it is now.
1981:11:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1947:01:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1929:01:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1916:00:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1895:23:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1855:18:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1812:15:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1802:21:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1785:20:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1775:19:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1741:21:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1712:20:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1693:19:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1672:17:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1657:17:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1637:17:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1618:15:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1591:11:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1553:15:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1484:21:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1448:20:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1438:19:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1342:17:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1317:17:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1285:Category:Geobox City, Poland
1263:21:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1208:Category:Geobox City, Poland
1200:15:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
1192:Category:Geobox City, Poland
1169:04:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
3405:and several other lists in
2981:, partly in order to reply
1703:Nominated to WP:CFD --: -->
1525:User talk:Caroig#Suggestion
3888:
3352:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel
3307:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel
3198:. Comments are welcome. -
2266:File:IE71920x1200BELOW.jpg
2256:File:IE71920x1200ABOVE.jpg
1214:, which is covered by the
1160:I've started a discussion
3291:NNDB Spider Man 3 article
2977:I've written a new essay
2959:I think the arguments at
2791:Knowledge (XXG):New users
2286:File:IE71024x768BELOW.jpg
2276:File:IE71024x768ABOVE.jpg
1873:USS Springfield (SSN-761)
3425:User talk:121.44.105.216
2368:Deletions without Debate
3343:defending the inclusion
2568:Date wikilinking policy
3452:Decommissioned highway
3339:Soylent Communications
3285:Possible NNDB spamming
2963:need to be considered.
2291:
2281:
2271:
2261:
1373:a renaming/merging to
1353:, which it should per
95:<Â Older discussions
3208:country or government
2918:Linking to harassment
2585:— or day and month —
2289:
2279:
2269:
2259:
2104:article message boxes
1650:Special:Whatlinkshere
84:Village pump (policy)
3421:User talk:121.44.4.8
3303:NNDB discussion page
2186:John Black (fiction)
2087:Nothing is mandatory
2066:John Black (fiction)
2052:John Black (fiction)
1494:Template_talk:Geobox
1228:behaves as if (s)he
2333:Template talk:Ambox
1359:Category:Categories
1351:Category:Categories
1306:Warta Bolesławiecka
1188:Warta Bolesławiecka
2873:Banning policy RfC
2718:creating new pages
2292:
2282:
2272:
2262:
1680:, following other
1299:Infobox Settlement
1294:Why don't you use
3873:
3851:doesn't apply. —
3807:
3795:comment added by
3760:
3748:comment added by
3717:
3705:comment added by
3662:
3650:comment added by
3623:
3611:comment added by
3589:original research
3556:
3544:comment added by
3519:
3507:comment added by
3456:this old revision
3262:
3256:
2865:
2395:
2379:comment added by
2220:
2214:
2122:
2070:Nikolas Cassadine
1897:
1881:comment added by
1852:
1846:
1404:" (my bolding) -
3879:
3864:
3790:
3743:
3700:
3645:
3606:
3539:
3502:
3485:how am I typing?
3474:use a wet noodle
3429:User:Adam.J.W.C.
3387:
3378:WikiProject Spam
3260:
3254:
3237:reliable sources
3085:
3068:
3010:
2864:
2813:
2810:
2807:
2799:
2780:
2765:
2732:
2642:are linked, they
2588:
2584:
2553:
2508:
2412:
2410:
2374:
2315:
2312:
2309:
2301:
2287:
2277:
2267:
2257:
2250:IE7 Screenshots
2218:
2212:
2164:
2161:
2158:
2150:
2116:
1976:
1963:Please also see
1911:
1876:
1850:
1844:
1726:
1720:
1597:machine readable
1588:Francis Schonken
1585:
1579:
1572:
1568:Geobox2 category
1566:
1541:
1535:
1515:
1509:
1505:
1499:
1473:
1467:
1462:
1456:
1435:Francis Schonken
1367:Category:Geobox2
1347:Category:Geobox2
1314:Francis Schonken
1303:
1297:
1241:
1235:
79:
54:
3887:
3886:
3882:
3881:
3880:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3495:
3482:user:orngjce223
3470:
3448:
3399:
3381:
3287:
3210:
3192:
3096:
3083:
3064:
3045:
3008:
2975:
2957:
2955:Deletion policy
2920:
2875:
2829:
2808:
2803:
2797:
2795:
2778:
2761:
2728:
2707:speedy deletion
2703:
2586:
2582:
2570:
2549:
2504:
2473:
2406:
2404:
2370:
2310:
2305:
2299:
2297:
2294:
2293:
2285:
2275:
2265:
2255:
2251:
2182:
2159:
2154:
2148:
2146:
2138:
2045:guidelines say
2042:
1972:
1969:reliable source
1909:
1869:
1835:Further reading
1749:
1724:
1718:
1583:
1577:
1570:
1564:
1539:
1533:
1513:
1507:
1503:
1497:
1471:
1465:
1460:
1454:
1301:
1295:
1239:
1233:
1176:
1158:
1151:
80:
77:
74:
48:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3885:
3883:
3875:
3874:
3832:
3831:
3786:
3785:
3739:
3738:
3689:
3688:
3687:
3686:
3664:
3663:
3641:
3640:
3636:
3635:
3599:
3598:
3578:
3577:
3535:
3534:
3494:
3491:
3469:
3466:
3447:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3433:User:Princeboy
3398:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3357:
3286:
3283:
3282:
3281:
3267:
3246:original ideas
3225:
3209:
3206:
3191:
3188:
3169:
3168:
3163:Dragons flight
3146:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3103:
3102:
3095:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3044:
3041:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3026:
2974:
2971:
2956:
2953:
2934:
2933:
2919:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2879:banning policy
2874:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2849:
2834:Sennen goroshi
2828:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2763:John Broughton
2754:
2753:
2748:Dragons flight
2730:John Broughton
2713:for details.)
2702:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2680:
2679:
2624:
2623:
2617:
2591:
2569:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2551:John Broughton
2537:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2516:
2515:
2506:John Broughton
2472:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2430:
2429:
2417:
2416:
2381:OlympedeCleves
2369:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2252:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2114:Ilmari Karonen
2084:
2047:top of article
2041:
2040:Top is where??
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2015:
2007:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1974:John Broughton
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1919:
1918:
1910:Gadget850 (Ed)
1868:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1760:
1759:
1756:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1641:
1640:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1601:auto-generated
1557:
1556:
1555:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1292:
1273:Category:Boxes
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1248:
1247:
1222:
1175:
1172:
1157:
1152:
92:
76:
75:
73:
72:
71:
70:
65:
60:
55:
43:
38:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3884:
3872:
3869:was added at
3868:
3862:
3858:
3854:
3850:
3846:
3845:
3844:
3843:
3840:
3836:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3806:
3802:
3798:
3794:
3784:
3780:
3776:
3772:
3768:
3763:
3762:
3761:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3747:
3737:
3733:
3729:
3725:
3720:
3719:
3718:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3704:
3697:
3693:
3685:
3681:
3677:
3673:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3661:
3657:
3653:
3649:
3643:
3642:
3638:
3637:
3634:
3631:
3626:
3625:
3624:
3622:
3618:
3614:
3610:
3603:
3597:
3594:
3590:
3585:
3580:
3579:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3543:
3533:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3499:
3492:
3490:
3489:
3486:
3483:
3479:
3475:
3467:
3465:
3464:
3461:
3457:
3453:
3445:
3441:
3438:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3412:
3408:
3404:
3396:
3390:
3386:
3385:
3379:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3356:
3353:
3349:
3346:
3344:
3340:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3320:
3316:
3315:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3284:
3280:
3277:
3272:
3268:
3266:
3263:
3257:
3251:
3247:
3243:
3238:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3231:
3228:
3223:
3220:
3216:
3213:
3207:
3205:
3204:
3201:
3197:
3189:
3187:
3186:
3183:
3177:
3173:
3167:
3164:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3147:
3142:
3139:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3130:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3119:
3114:
3111:
3107:
3101:
3098:
3097:
3089:
3086:
3079:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3060:
3057:
3054:
3048:
3042:
3040:
3039:
3036:
3025:
3022:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3003:
3002:
3001:
2998:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2972:
2970:
2969:
2966:
2962:
2954:
2952:
2951:
2948:
2945:
2942:
2939:
2932:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2925:
2917:
2913:
2910:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2884:
2880:
2872:
2868:
2863:
2862:Seraphimblade
2859:
2855:
2850:
2848:
2845:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2835:
2826:
2816:
2812:
2811:
2806:
2800:
2792:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2768:
2764:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2752:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2735:
2731:
2726:
2721:
2719:
2714:
2712:
2708:
2701:
2698:
2692:
2689:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2663:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2653:
2649:
2645:
2643:
2637:
2632:
2629:
2622:
2618:
2616:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2590:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2575:
2567:
2559:
2556:
2552:
2547:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2533:
2530:
2525:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2514:
2511:
2507:
2502:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2492:
2488:
2483:
2481:
2476:
2470:
2464:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2431:
2427:
2424:
2419:
2418:
2415:
2411:
2409:
2408:Sephiroth BCR
2402:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2367:
2359:
2356:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2341:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2325:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2313:
2308:
2302:
2288:
2278:
2268:
2258:
2243:
2233:
2230:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2221:
2215:
2209:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2192:
2187:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2162:
2157:
2151:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2057:
2053:
2048:
2039:
2027:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2013:
2008:
2005:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1982:
1979:
1975:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1948:
1945:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1904:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1874:
1866:
1856:
1853:
1847:
1841:
1836:
1832:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1813:
1810:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1798:
1793:
1789:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1766:
1757:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1723:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1694:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1626:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1582:
1575:
1569:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1538:
1531:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1519:
1512:
1502:
1495:
1491:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1474:talk page? –
1470:
1459:
1452:
1451:
1449:
1446:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1323:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1300:
1293:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1238:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
96:
91:
89:
85:
69:
68:Miscellaneous
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
52:
47:
44:
42:
39:
37:
34:
33:
32:
31:
27:
26:
19:
3833:
3797:131.172.4.43
3787:
3766:
3750:131.172.4.43
3740:
3707:131.172.4.43
3698:
3694:
3690:
3652:131.172.4.43
3613:131.172.4.43
3604:
3600:
3593:Collectonian
3546:131.172.4.43
3536:
3509:131.172.4.43
3500:
3496:
3471:
3449:
3400:
3397:Scroll boxes
3383:
3288:
3269:Agree. And
3224:
3221:
3217:
3214:
3211:
3193:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3115:
3112:
3108:
3104:
3065:
3061:
3058:
3049:
3046:
3032:
3009:Adrian M. H.
3006:
3005:
2976:
2958:
2935:
2930:
2921:
2876:
2857:
2853:
2830:
2804:
2801:
2779:Adrian M. H.
2776:
2775:
2724:
2722:
2717:
2715:
2704:
2699:
2647:
2641:
2639:
2635:
2633:
2627:
2625:
2619:
2609:1982 in film
2602:
2598:
2593:
2580:
2571:
2523:
2484:
2477:
2474:
2407:
2371:
2320:
2306:
2303:
2295:
2183:
2155:
2152:
2108:
2046:
2043:
2003:
1907:
1906:
1870:
1834:
1830:
1796:
1769:
1761:
1750:
1702:
1677:
1664:
1649:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1529:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1362:
1229:
1215:
1177:
1159:
375:
368:
97:
93:
81:
30:Village pump
28:
3865:—Preceding
3853:Someguy0830
3839:86.21.74.40
3817:Someguy0830
3791:—Preceding
3771:Someguy0830
3767:did not say
3744:—Preceding
3724:Someguy0830
3701:—Preceding
3672:Someguy0830
3646:—Preceding
3607:—Preceding
3584:Someguy0830
3563:Someguy0830
3540:—Preceding
3503:—Preceding
3468:Wet noodle?
2944:Will Beback
2605:1441 in art
2447:PrimeHunter
2375:—Preceding
2355:CelticGreen
2229:CelticGreen
2191:CelticGreen
2056:CelticGreen
1944:CelticGreen
1926:LeadSongDog
1877:—Preceding
1727:talk page:
1559:As for the
1226:User:Caroig
1180:User:Caroig
3384:Satori Son
3335:Rotten.com
3301:, and the
3159:copyrights
3151:defamation
2854:preferable
2603:" such as
2574:WP:CONTEXT
2546:seam types
2485:Thank you,
2480:seam types
2012:verifiable
1831:References
1648:? Due to
100:Archives:
51:persistent
3849:WP:SEASON
3835:WP:SEASON
3478:wet trout
3305:. Thanks
3200:Jehochman
3021:GTBacchus
2987:GTBacchus
2973:New essay
2883:Jehochman
2858:mandatory
2688:Gatoclass
2652:Gatoclass
1166:Jehochman
46:Proposals
41:Technical
3793:unsigned
3746:unsigned
3703:unsigned
3648:unsigned
3609:unsigned
3605:-Zaij
3542:unsigned
3505:unsigned
3369:DreamGuy
3261:contribs
3250:Jayron32
3182:Gmaxwell
3129:Carnildo
3066:Mattisse
2983:WP:SPADE
2965:Herve661
2844:Carnildo
2744:See here
2648:supposed
2529:Wikidemo
2491:Snap pea
2487:Snap pea
2460:Bedivere
2401:reverted
2389:contribs
2377:unsigned
2219:contribs
2208:Jayron32
2079:TAnthony
2077:well. —
2023:Rdfox 76
2019:Rdfox 76
1891:contribs
1879:unsigned
1851:contribs
1840:Jayron32
1809:Karanacs
1709:Darwinek
1669:Darwinek
1431:WP:NCCAT
1406:machines
1339:Darwinek
1197:Darwinek
1174:Question
58:Idea lab
3867:comment
3813:WP:DATE
3699:-Zaij
3644:-Zaij
3480:! ;-P ~
3319:Quatloo
3242:neutral
3227:Aixroot
3035:Ravpapa
2601:subject
2475:Hello,
2423:SEWilco
2109:believe
2095:Atropos
2004:content
1782:SEWilco
1690:SEWilco
1654:SEWilco
1634:SEWilco
1561:WP:BOTS
1445:SEWilco
1415:WP:BOTS
1391:WP:BOTS
1304:in the
1178:Hello.
3630:Powers
3591:line.
3501:Zaij
3365:WP:COI
3271:boldly
3138:Powers
3118:Powers
2899:... ++
2662:8 July
2611:, and
2503:. --
2471:Images
2456:WP:DRV
1965:WP:NOT
1883:Divsky
1733:Caroig
1722:Geobox
1610:Caroig
1581:Geobox
1545:Caroig
1537:Geobox
1511:geobox
1501:Geobox
1476:Caroig
1469:Geobox
1458:Geobox
1427:WP:CAT
1423:WP:ASR
1411:WP:OWN
1398:policy
1387:WP:ASR
1379:WP:CfD
1335:WP:CFD
1289:WP:CfD
1277:WP:ASR
1255:Caroig
1244:WP:OWN
1237:Geobox
1219:WP:IAR
1216:policy
1184:Geobox
36:Policy
3525:WP:OR
3295:WP:EL
3276:Obina
3155:libel
3080:. --
2832:them?
2669:SamBC
2129:this:
1605:seems
1419:WP:NC
1310:Sejny
1182:'s {{
88:start
16:<
3801:talk
3754:talk
3711:talk
3656:talk
3617:talk
3582:As
3550:talk
3529:Kesh
3513:talk
3435:. --
3409:. --
3337:and
3331:NNDB
3274:etc.
3255:talk
3248:. --
3084:ASEM
2997:D3av
2941:·:·
2767:(♫♫)
2734:(♫♫)
2725:talk
2673:talk
2665:2001
2650:to?
2628:ever
2597:year
2555:(♫♫)
2510:(♫♫)
2385:talk
2337:matt
2213:talk
2119:talk
1978:(♫♫)
1901:See
1887:talk
1845:talk
1797:talk
1770:talk
1737:talk
1731:. –
1705:here
1688:. (
1632:. (
1614:talk
1549:talk
1480:talk
1433:. --
1429:and
1337:? -
1329:and
1259:talk
1232:the
1230:owns
1190:and
3863:)
3460:NE2
3450:On
3437:NE2
3411:NE2
3329:in
3161:.
3116:--
2947:·:·
2901:Lar
2809:man
2798:Mr.
2746:.
2599:in
2583:] ]
2524:but
2458:.--
2331:or
2311:man
2300:Mr.
2160:man
2149:Mr.
1792:RJH
1765:RJH
1599:or
1224:If
1148:195
1144:194
1140:193
1136:192
1132:191
1128:190
1124:189
1120:188
1116:187
1112:186
1108:185
1104:184
1100:183
1096:182
1092:181
1088:180
1084:179
1080:178
1076:177
1072:176
1068:175
1064:174
1060:173
1056:172
1052:171
1048:170
1044:169
1040:168
1036:167
1032:166
1028:165
1024:164
1020:163
1016:162
1012:161
1008:160
1004:159
1000:158
996:157
992:156
988:155
984:154
980:153
976:152
972:151
968:150
964:149
960:148
956:147
952:146
948:145
944:144
940:143
936:142
932:141
928:140
924:139
920:138
916:137
912:136
908:135
904:134
900:133
896:132
892:131
888:130
884:129
880:128
876:127
872:126
868:125
864:124
860:123
856:122
852:121
848:120
844:119
840:118
836:117
832:116
828:115
824:114
820:113
816:112
812:111
808:110
804:109
800:108
796:107
792:106
788:105
784:104
780:103
776:102
772:101
768:100
63:WMF
3859:|
3827:)
3823:|
3803:)
3781:)
3777:|
3756:)
3734:)
3730:|
3713:)
3682:)
3678:|
3658:)
3619:)
3573:)
3569:|
3552:)
3515:)
3431:,
3427:,
3423:,
3350:.
3333:,
3127:--
2926::
2903::
2860:.
2805:Z-
2675:)
2615:.
2607:,
2445:.
2441:,
2437:,
2391:)
2387:•
2340:br
2307:Z-
2296:--
2156:Z-
1893:)
1889:•
1838:--
1800:)
1787:)
1773:)
1763:—
1739:)
1725:}}
1719:{{
1667:-
1659:)
1616:)
1584:}}
1578:{{
1571:}}
1565:{{
1551:)
1540:}}
1534:{{
1514:}}
1508:{{
1504:}}
1498:{{
1482:)
1472:}}
1466:{{
1461:}}
1455:{{
1450:)
1425:,
1417:,
1413:,
1357:("
1302:}}
1296:{{
1261:)
1240:}}
1234:{{
1146:,
1142:,
1138:,
1134:,
1130:,
1126:,
1122:,
1118:,
1114:,
1110:,
1106:,
1102:,
1098:,
1094:,
1090:,
1086:,
1082:,
1078:,
1074:,
1070:,
1066:,
1062:,
1058:,
1054:,
1050:,
1046:,
1042:,
1038:,
1034:,
1030:,
1026:,
1022:,
1018:,
1014:,
1010:,
1006:,
1002:,
998:,
994:,
990:,
986:,
982:,
978:,
974:,
970:,
966:,
962:,
958:,
954:,
950:,
946:,
942:,
938:,
934:,
930:,
926:,
922:,
918:,
914:,
910:,
906:,
902:,
898:,
894:,
890:,
886:,
882:,
878:,
874:,
870:,
866:,
862:,
858:,
854:,
850:,
846:,
842:,
838:,
834:,
830:,
826:,
822:,
818:,
814:,
810:,
806:,
802:,
798:,
794:,
790:,
786:,
782:,
778:,
774:,
770:,
766:,
764:99
762:,
760:98
758:,
756:97
754:,
752:96
750:,
748:95
746:,
744:94
742:,
740:93
738:,
736:92
734:,
732:91
730:,
728:90
726:,
724:89
722:,
720:88
718:,
716:87
714:,
712:86
710:,
708:85
706:,
704:84
702:,
700:83
698:,
696:82
694:,
692:81
690:,
688:80
686:,
684:79
682:,
680:78
678:,
676:77
674:,
672:76
670:,
668:75
666:,
664:74
662:,
660:73
658:,
656:72
654:,
652:71
650:,
648:70
646:,
644:69
642:,
640:68
638:,
636:67
634:,
632:66
630:,
628:65
626:,
624:64
622:,
620:63
618:,
616:62
614:,
612:61
610:,
608:60
606:,
604:59
602:,
600:58
598:,
596:57
594:,
592:56
590:,
588:55
586:,
584:54
582:,
580:53
578:,
576:52
574:,
572:51
570:,
568:50
566:,
564:49
562:,
560:48
558:,
556:47
554:,
552:46
550:,
548:45
546:,
544:44
542:,
540:43
538:,
536:42
534:,
532:41
530:,
528:40
526:,
524:39
522:,
520:38
518:,
516:37
514:,
512:36
510:,
508:35
506:,
504:34
502:,
500:33
498:,
496:32
494:,
492:31
490:,
488:30
486:,
484:29
482:,
480:28
478:,
476:27
474:,
472:26
470:,
468:25
466:,
464:24
462:,
460:23
458:,
456:22
454:,
452:21
450:,
448:20
446:,
444:19
442:,
440:18
438:,
436:17
434:,
432:16
430:,
428:15
426:,
424:14
422:,
420:13
418:,
416:12
414:,
412:11
410:,
408:10
406:,
402:,
398:,
394:,
390:,
386:,
382:,
378:,
374:,
366:BO
364:,
362:BN
360:,
358:BM
356:,
354:BL
352:,
350:BK
348:,
346:BJ
344:,
342:BI
340:,
338:BH
336:,
334:BG
332:,
330:BF
328:,
326:BE
324:,
322:BD
320:,
318:BC
316:,
314:BB
312:,
310:BA
308:,
306:AZ
304:,
302:AY
300:,
298:AX
296:,
294:AW
292:,
290:AV
288:,
286:AU
284:,
282:AT
280:,
278:AS
276:,
274:AR
272:,
270:AQ
268:,
266:AP
264:,
262:AO
260:,
258:AN
256:,
254:AM
252:,
250:AL
248:,
246:AK
244:,
242:AJ
240:,
238:AI
236:,
234:AH
232:,
230:AG
228:,
226:AF
224:,
222:AE
220:,
218:AD
216:,
214:AC
212:,
210:AB
208:,
206:AA
204:,
200:,
196:,
192:,
188:,
184:,
180:,
176:,
172:,
168:,
164:,
160:,
156:,
152:,
148:,
144:,
140:,
136:,
132:,
128:,
124:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
104:,
3861:C
3857:T
3855:(
3825:C
3821:T
3819:(
3799:(
3779:C
3775:T
3773:(
3752:(
3732:C
3728:T
3726:(
3709:(
3680:C
3676:T
3674:(
3654:(
3615:(
3571:C
3567:T
3565:(
3548:(
3511:(
3258:|
3252:|
3082:M
2909:c
2907:/
2905:t
2671:(
2595:"
2587:]
2428:)
2421:(
2383:(
2216:|
2210:|
2121:)
2117:(
2112:—
1885:(
1848:|
1842:|
1794:(
1767:(
1735:(
1695:)
1639:)
1612:(
1547:(
1478:(
1443:(
1257:(
1221:.
404:9
400:8
396:7
392:6
388:5
384:4
380:3
376:2
372:1
369:·
202:Z
198:Y
194:X
190:W
186:V
182:U
178:T
174:S
170:R
166:Q
162:P
158:O
154:N
150:M
146:L
142:K
138:J
134:I
130:H
126:G
122:F
118:E
114:D
110:C
106:B
102:A
98:·
53:)
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.