Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)/Archive 36

2525:. The subject in question isn't exactly a "factual spoiler." It's a psychological test widely used and accepted in the professional community that depends on the test-taker not having too much exposure to the image. One extreme side wants the image on the page, so that anybody that comes upon the article about the test itself for any reason, can no longer take that test; the other extreme side felt that showing the image would be harmful to some people and should not be displayed. A compromise between the extremes was in place for quite a while. It provided the viewer with the informed choice about whether to see the image or not by having the viewer click onto it in order to display it (other proposed compromises had been to use a simulated image rather than an actual one from the test, or a blackened version of the image). The current guidelines and policies don't cover this specific case; the no disclaimer policy applies to medical advice, spoilers, legal advice, etc. I had proposed a thought experiemtn or analogy: what if the wikipedia page about antibiotics included an image of an antibiotic that automatically displayed and which magically rendered the viewer who saw it incapable of using antibiotics. Shouldn't there be a warning, preserving the right of those who want to see the image to see it (and thus harm themselves potentially, which is their free right), while not forcing 3347:"Oh but there is such a place," you say, "it's this very page." Or the mailing list. Or the community portal. Or the centralized discussions page. Or RFC/Policies. Or some other page I don't even know about yet, or that I've already forgotten. So in fact there isn't one centralized page at all; there are several competing centralized pages. Can't we tidy this up? Have one page, well-known to everyone, which simply lists and briefly summarizes ongoing discussions. And an explicit meta-policy stating that no material change to policy/guidelines can be made until consensus has been reached in a discussion 3508:) requires that a direct quote has to be attributed to a third party source. It's like, I can't write - Mr. B said "XYZ" - and link it to Mr. B's website, or book or whatever. By the policies, I must write something like - In the book D, Mr. B has been quoted as saying "XYZ" - and link it to an website or the book that isn't related to Mr. B. Isn't this a bit crazy? The most reliable source for a direct quote can only be a self-published source. I cannot misquote me more than you can. Right? Is this policy direction for real? Or is this just a bizarre perversion of the spirit of Knowledge (XXG)? 1435:(some guy moaning into a webcam) or a copyvio from another source. As such, neither would be usable as sources. You could cite a programme that just happened to be illegally uploaded to YouTube, but linking to the YouTube clip would violate policy. The very rare occasion YouTube could be a legitimate source is when the publishers of a reliable source (TV show or something) upload a clip to YouTube. I know that some record labels occasionally upload their own music videos, and so I would imagine there will be a few clips of reliable TV shows that have been uploaded legally around the site. 3964:

guideline page, as you suggest? Perhaps on the talk page of a larger, more prominent city in Kosovo? And then you can place notices on the talk pages of the various articles where the reverts are happening, asking people not to revert except according to a clear consensus established at the central place for discussion, and providing a link to it. And at the central place for discussion, you can present arguments such as the above. At least, this is the usual procedure I think, but I wonder if it would create more conflict in a case like this. --

1983: 4350:). I think we do it very well. I'm sure (without investigating very much) there has been more edit warring than you can shake a stick at. But we have some great articles at the end of the day if you want a balanced view of a controversial situation. I did a search of Arbcom completed cases, and found nothing much about China. Why would Arbcom have to make a decision about this? The process works 3729:

to his article "According to UrbanDictionary, Bill Gates is an alien from Mars" (or, if I wanted to use a definition that's already there, apparently I could use Urban Dictionary to source that Bill Gates is "a nazi", or "the devil in disguise"). Allowing things to be in Knowledge (XXG) articles just because they're in UrbanDictionary opens the doors to pretty much literally everything. The book

4227:

a) we're the English wikipedia and b) America is the most important country in the world, Britain is one of the most important countries, and Australia is a very important country in Asia, where a lot of who-is-a-state flux is happening, and all three countries are generally considered to be sensible on these sorts of issues. Nobody needs to rush about worrying about what the

2810:). For me, I prefer it at the bottom and proper indentation for threading, but if there is a use for the opposite and it outweighs the use of going from top-to-bottom, then use it. But I don't understand "some people will apparently respond to you "above" your comment for the sake of saving face" - I've never seen that happen - do you have anything to show for that? 4193:

English-language criteria won't cut it. You could wind up with the decision hanging on the Liberian or Caymanian position while ignoring the Russians, Chinese or French positions. Any old regional power block? (what if the African Union disagrees with the European Union over a middle east territory's statehood?) There is an informative discussion at

1594: 4346:, an incredibly complicated, controversial case of sovereignty and statehood. ISO lists it as TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA. It is not a member of the UNGA. Nevertheless, it functions as a state--it has an independent government, military, foreign policy, etc. We show that complexity in both brief, punchy statements and in great detail ( 1309:. However, YouTube's really just a medium, and as for the reliability of a source, you have to consider what's being played over that medium and where it comes from. A lecture by some internationally renowned scholar broadcast over YouTube is likely to be a reliable source. Some guy ranting into his webcam probably isn't. See 4255:

I couldn't disagree more. "Common-sense" (ad-hoc) decision making is a guaranteed recipe for edit warring between editors who are partisans of either side: on WP decisions are only taken if you can arrive at consensus (unless you wish to force every new country through an ARBCOM process). If we want

2762:

Well, I write a response to a comment from an editor, then there is an edit conflict. Has happened with almost every edit in the Delegable Proxy section today. Do I put it at the bottom, or where it was originally written to go. There are formatting methods of keeping it all clear, and I do use them.

2545:

I just thought of another analogy, albeit an extreme one (tot he point of absurdity, but it still illustrates the same principle). What if seeing an image from the movie the Ring led to the consequences shown in that film? Shouldn't there be a warning that would give people the choice about whether

3736:

Some self-published sources are fine, and if you want to establish what Bill Gates says about MacOS, citing his blog is fine, because things on there can reliably be taken to have been said by a known, notable person (i.e. Bill Gates). UrbanDictionary, though, has too little editorial oversight and

3728:

The problem with things like UrbanDictionary is that literally anyone can add anything; so something being in there in no way establishes notability or verifiability. If I thought that Bill Gates was an alien from Mars, I could go to UrbanDictionary, add "Bill Gates is an alien from Mars", then add

2739:

Another thing, too, is that there is no standard for whether stuff should go to the "bottom" or the "top." In various procedural pages, some of them work from the top down, others work from the bottom up. This likely confuses the heck out of newbies who don't know whether their comments should go at

2728:

This is extremely annoying and when people do it, it makes it very difficult to read and apparently misleading. If you, for instance, rebut a certain point made by a person, some people will apparently respond to you "above" your comment for the sake of saving face. In order to read the conversation

2351:

I would like to generate some new graphs de novo, but I suspect that the people who have created the article will not appreciate them. Before I generate the graphs, I would like to make sure that I'm not doing Original Research by making graphs based off of publicly available algorithms. Opinions?

2203:

If you're an admin and it's truly fruitless or misleading (e.g. a misspelling nobody would ever make, or some kind of POV statement) I think you can just delete it as an IAR or housekeeping matter. If it's plausible and doesn't hurt anything, best to let it be, because for all you know somewhere in

1907:

In my opinion the address of a place is an important piece of information about it. It's not that different from including the longitude and latitude of every city. It doesn't necessarily help you understand the topic, but we're a reference work for facts as well as a source for learning. That said,

4365:

All that said, you make a deciding point about NPOV re: English-language sources. It happens that the world's superpower is an English-speaking country and several other English-speaking countries are very important players on the world stage, but there are clearly other important countries from a

4260:

our only interest in language should be accessibility to the reader. Yes we prefer to have English language references to cite, but the foreign policy position of a country is in no way made more or less important based on the languages spoken in it. Every large, diverse federation I can think of

4226:

There's absolutely no need to make this harder than it has to be. A rough, common-sense standard, settled on a case-to-case basis, is all that's needed, because that's the way the world itself makes these determinations. We should care more about what English-speaking countries say and do because

3053:

to make that policy more favorable to fringe and tiny-minority views ("sympathetic" is the word being used). This may or may not be something Knowledge (XXG) should do, but such a change should have consensus of the broader community and not just the few that hang around on the policy pages. Thus a

2175:

Like a rendezvous in a seedy hotel, these redirects are "cheap" but also unsatisfying. If you, a Knowledge (XXG) reader, type in a search term hoping to read all about a highly specific topic and end up redirected to a relevant but very long article that doesn't even mention your search term once,

1241:

wasn't blocked and wasn't really using the IP as a sockpuppet at the time (i.e. I don't see any evidence he? was trying to do anything illegitimate with the IP). I guess either he forgot to log on or he didn't want to log on because he was using a university computer. Is it still okay to list it in

4525:

I think it would be counter-productive to add another guideline to cities like Kosovo, these are people who are willing to die for their cause, which means that another guidline won't help, you have to put a straight out block onto the sites relating to Serbia and Kosovo, otherwise the changes and

4110:

I don't think a single ironclad standard is going to work. For example, Kosovo is not likely to become a UN member for a long time, because Russia will veto any attempt to join. I think J.delanoy's rough standard of whether or not most English-speaking countries have recognized a state is a good

3544:

It depends who Mr B is, and what he said. If Mr B is important then there should be plenty of stuff about him, and so I guess you could ignore all rules and do direct quotes. BUT if Mr B is some minor fringe wing-nut then you need to be careful with sourcing. It might be useful if you gave some

2592:

psychological tests required the person not to have been exposed to it the IQ tests come to mind). The only problem with this one is that unlike the IQ tests, the copyright for the Rorschach has expired so people who have no moral qualms about undermining a useful test can post it on the internet

1449:

My point is that WikiWorld is an unreliable source. My question stems from this--I had been thinking of doing a series of videos based on some of the articles here, and then linking back to the videos. As the videos would be GFDL or CC-licensed, I'm wondering why WikiWorld would be used, but not

1305:, but my read is that what you'd want to do in that case is cite the source not as YouTube, but as the TV show itself; then in the source you can link to the YouTube reproduction of the show for convenience. As for YouTube being unacceptable as a source, the closest policy to saying that would be 4149:

Just a note on Taiwan, they were removed from China's seat at the UN which resulted in them being removed from the general assembly. So the UN has not said that Taiwan is not a country but that they do not represent China. Taiwan has recently tried (unsuccessfully) to get their own seat though...

3704:

When you start saying "every statement must be sourced" and "every source must be third-party" and "every third-party should be authenticated by an authority", and then include everything under the sky into that narrow doctrine, it becomes really constricting, and counter-productive. That kind of

2564:

No. Your examples are not remotely apropos. And even if they were: Knowledge (XXG) is not censored. We don't remove information that may lead to fanatics bombing the Wikimedia servers, or knowledge of which may make you the target of government persecution. If the test relies on people not having

2388:

In the case of rendering published equations to an original image, all you are doing is translation between languages (in this case from math to cartesian). There are stylistic options in rendering (segment of axes to be shown, e.g.), but the rendered information is not optional. The NOR policy

2190:

There's two ways that could be taken: you can either delete the redirect, or a better solution is if the redirected term is appropriate to be discussed on the page that it is redirected to but is presently not talked about is to include discussion of that term yourself or at least let the authors

1939:

Where do we draw the line on addresses? and keep in mind the issue of privacy. We wouldn't necessarily put the address of Britney Spear's agent or Ellen Degeneres would we? Where do we draw the line on addresses? Should we now check all the company articles (Microsoft, Google, etc) to ensure they

1495:

I would say that linking to unofficial YouTube videos is not acceptable (not reliable sources). However, linking to official content hosted on YouTube (such as music videos uploaded by the label itself) I would consider viable. For example, linking to LisaNova's YouTube page makes complete sense.

1383:

Youtube is no different from an external link. It may contain some reliable sources, mostly it has lots of unreliable garbage. There is of course a problem of citing video sources in general - note that they are very rarely cited in academia, for example. Even documentaries and such don't have (I

3339:

Being still relatively new here, and having recently got involved in discussions involving changes in policy/guidelines, I can't help feeling that the whole page structure around this process is excessively arcane and opaque. There are so many places where changes might be discussed, and so many

2805:

There are multiple arguments for and against chronological and reverse-chronological order - some say that by doing the last thing at the bottom means that the order of comments is preserved; my eyes don't have to move up and down to go to a reply; and that it's like reading an article. For the

2288:

but the term was never used. In some cases, the target article should be expanded to cover the topic the redirect would, but when that topic isn't covered and consensus seems to be not to cover it, the redirect should be deleted. (However, watch out for redirects left over from an old merge.)

2094:

concerning what kinds of categories should be hidden (using the new HIDDENCAT magic word). For the moment it is proposed that hiding be applied to all categories which classify the article rather than the article subject (i.e. maintenance cats, stub cats, "Spoken articles" etc.) Please weigh in.

3351:(for a specified number of days). This way no-one can object that they were left out of a discussion, as also seems to have happened recently. (Oh and perhaps a separate, protected namespace for policies and guidelines, to prevent unauthorized edits or unapproved pages masquerading as policy.)-- 3848:

The short justification: I continue to find many places where people do not seem to understand this, and who believe that if they use a secondary source for material, they have to acknowledge the source they actually used. Therefore they cite the ultimate source without acknowledging that they

2587:

The second one is not; I wrote it in haste. Tee image is not censored, but hidden (requiring a click). It is no more censored than it would be if there was a seperate wikipedia page written only about the inkblots, and a link made to that page. Your comment about the test being flawed if it

4388:

it's pretty much an untenable assumption there. The result has been an article that is an embarrassment to all of WP. Indeed, virtually every history article in the region is plagued by the same behaviour. I think you may have missed your own point on ISO3166: it already has the compromise

3890:

I think we should write at least a temporary guideline regarding this since I (and I assume many others) are unsure of whether to revert these changes. Most English-speaking countries, indeed most Western powers, including the US, the UK, France and Australia have formally recognized Kosovo's

4235:

or Kurdistan. Obviously whether or not America has recognized a country is something the whole world wants to know, and a lot fewer people care about Canada and Liberia's positions. Everyone knows very well why Spain and Russia haven't recognized Kosovo, and those countries' concerns about

3963:

This is just my suggestion on how to handle this. I'm not sure whether this is productive or not, but I think the key is to set up one central place for discussion of this issue. Perhaps here? (or not -- perhaps long threads are not wanted here.) Perhaps on the talk page of a new temporary

2620:

I have noticed that the powers that be have in the last few months made it quite clear that our current NPOV policy is outdated and should not be maintained in its current form. I suggest that under the current circumstances, having a set of NPOV texts which do not conform to the reality is

4541:

Yeah, the FAQ is interesting. I find the statement "By adhering to UN sources the ISO 3166/MA stays politically neutral." to be one of the most amusing things I've read today. And the UN table is just spooky. Where's the ROC? Did those 23 million people just vanish? It ain't exactly

4192:

Alternative standards? Acknowledgment by all bordering states? Half of all UNGA members? (big job to keep track of all the positions) Half the global population? (too easy, with just China and India you're almost there) Half the global GNP? (like it or not money talks) Certainly an

4473:

Well, so far a minority of the world's countries representing a minority of the world's population, have recognized Kosovo. And nor has the UN, the EU (a minority of EU members have recognized, although they are the largest ones), etc. etc. It's probably premature for wikipedia to do

1511:

I agree that the solution is to cite the original TV source that showed the band. But I also agree that Youtube is just another source of media and I think you should be able to cite from it, if that was the original source from which a notable topic began... such as LisaNova, or

3755:

quotes, then I really don't see a problem. And, really, my worries are not about UrbanDictionary at all (though it's pretty near to impossible to authenticate emerging dialectical terms, a.k.a. neologisms, to be put into articles as alternative names for something... *sigh*).

3452:

Not at all. Doing that successfully is an example of successful interaction with others. Some people try to be an unobtrusive Wikignome and do it wrong. Being invisible is a skill, as is reacting appropriately when you're inevitably approached with some question or concern.

2985:. Each individual reader should have the option of whether to display new messages on the top or bottom, whether to display them in a threaded manner or sequentially, and so on - but can't without a full-fledged forum system, which would have many other advantages as well. 4261:

has multiple languages (official or not) but we're not going to start applying weighting factors on the position of India or Pakistan based on the percentage of their English speakers. No ruleset agreed on is going to separately consider the foreign policy of present-day

1683:

Users should be warned about 3RR before being blocked for violating it. This user didn't make any reversions after being warned about 3RR. (and they were indefinitely blocked over 10 hours before this section was started, so I'm not sure where you're seeing the leniency)

3701:. But, please, believe that I don't mind this particular piece of information never showing up (I have seen much worse, and I trust this process of rejection and dispute be the hallmark of a community project). My general worry is about the implication. 1917:

I'd agree with Kingturtle, at least in the provided example. City and State is sufficient; there are online directories for street addresses. If the address itself lends to notability, perhaps, but in a template situation I'm inclined to say forget it.

2347:

I'm seeing some graphs in an article (to remain nameless) of a heavily political subject that just don't agree with my reading of the equations. The graphs are generated by someone on one side of the issue, and thus not entirely without bias, anyway.

3895:, no English-speaking country has outright refused to recognize Kosovo, I would like to propose that all places/buildings/whatever that are located in Kosovo be identified as Country: Kosovo in the English Knowledge (XXG). What do other people think? 3883:

I have been patrolling recent changes for quite some time, and I have noticed that articles about cities, towns, counties, etc. that are located in Kosovo are being changed from Country: Serbia to Country: Kosovo to Country: Serbia to Country: Kosovo

1534:

I am wondering what the rational is for putting external links in their own section near the end is. would obviously be more helpful if it were a link within the list, but some editors more even inline citations to an "external links' section.

1285:

In particular, I'm hoping to use Youtube as a source to prove that a band was on a TV show. If the interview with the band was flighted on Romanian TV, and there is a clip on Youtube, is this not acceptable as a source to prove they were on TV?

1430:

Sorry if I've missed the point, but WikiWorld is a comic strip created from free content found on Knowledge (XXG), and YouTube is a video hosting service. Quite different. As for the matter at hand- almost every video on YouTube is either an

2204:

the world they use an alternate spelling (e.g. Pozole and Posole) or a colloquialism or something. If you're not an admin then I don't know. You can nominate it for G6 deletion using the {{db-maintenance}} tag. MfD seems like overkill.

4018:. In order to avoid edit wars ad nauseum on arbitrary POV, may I suggest that a general policy on disputed nationhood and boundaries should be constructed and applied. My preference for nationhood would be to adopt whatever position the 1660:, and still unblocked. My intention is not to attack this editor by mentioning his case here, I just want to show that some Admins show Leniency, in blocking, while some don't. So is this "leniency" a policy or just a common practice. -- 4393:. "Taiwan, Province of China" says neither "of the Peoples Republic of China" nor "of the Republic of China". Neither side is happy with the compromise position, but they can live with it and for the time being, nobody's shooting. 2325:. But how does it help anyone who's actually looking for information on those topics if the main article doesn't devote a single word to the subject that redirects there? Far better to delete those redirects than mislead people.-- 4337:

run by an official living in the UK--very far away from being an independent country. Why do we need to have this decision made by an outside authority? Every outside authority is making decisions based on its needs, not ours.

4553:

have recognized Kosovo, as have a majority of the world's superpowers. Yes, China and Russia can veto America, Britain, and France in the security council. But they won't go to the mat to keep Kosovo part of Serbia, either.

2708:

since that clearly is unwanted here. I am suggesting that the current standards are too vague and do not align properly with the mood of Knowledge (XXG). And so are unnecessarily confusing and lead to too much conflict and

2957:"Thread your post: Use indentation to clearly indicate who you are replying to, as with usual threaded discussions. Normally colons are used, not bullet points (although the latter are commonly used at AfD, CfD, etc.)." 2729:

clearly and order, your eyes have to jump around, up and then down, and carefully looking at each timestamp. That's as disruptive as people not signing their comments, although in some cases (obviously) it's necessary.

3340:

places where people ought to be notified of discussions taking place elsewhere, that it seems clear there ought to be one centralized page which everyone who's anyone watches, and where any policy-related discussions

3849:

haven't actually seen it. At present I'm involved in a case where the ultimate source doesn't appear to exist, though if it did exist it might be considered a valid secondary source if it could be verified directly.

1633:

is a good policy, and it seems to have been fairly applied in your case. If you want some free advice, let it drop, remove the 3RR note to vandals from your userpage, and this whole thing is forgotten in a month.

2438:

Yeah, that's the other strategy; just switch the image and take it to a discussion if someone else brings it up. It's great if nobody bothers, but you might find yourself on the back-foot if someone questions the

2831:

Top posting is a bad thing when the defacto consensus is to bottom post. It creates confusion, makes manual archiving more difficult, and creates the risk useful comments will be ignored because no one sees them

1496:

It's the same as linking to a band's official MySpace page. If it contains further reliable information related to the subject, I think it can be included. And what does WikiWorld have to do with anything? ^_^ ~

2376:

an exception to original research. From the information you've given, I suggest you go ahead an make the new graph, then post it on the article's talk page with a list of reasons you think it's an improvement.

2156:

Generally the guideline regarding redirects is that they are, for the most part, "cheap." There is a speedy deletion criterion for redirects that applies to really obscure, unlikely search terms and such

2506:

side to be quite vague. Where do we stand on factual spoilers? do we need clearer policy in this area? is it covered by existing policy? Do we have a duty of care beyond our duties to the encyclopedia?

3004:

contains a large section of text copied from somewhere else. I believe this kind of thing does not belong in wikipedia, and rather in wikisource or similar. Does policy state that I should remove it?--

2071:

says so explicitly), but for public buildings, corporations, schools and the like, it should be up to the editors working on that page or in a project. I don't see a need for instruction creep here.--

2191:

know that the term is being redirected to that page and they should consider talking about that topic to some level of detail. Only in the case of patently nonsense redirects should it be deleted. --

3388:

page explaining the process of policy-building here at Knowledge (XXG). The page was not appreciated in the long run: I saved a part of it, added new content and converted to essay. Here's the link:

3265:

Do you think that the above section happening at the same time means that the pages were marked at the same moment, or was that a bot-running event? I don't see how the two pages could be related.

1550:

Hmmm, seems to me that that should not be a link but a reference. Citations should not go in External links. External links are links to related resources located in other places on the internet. ~

1871:. But basically, buildings can be notable if they meet our general notability guidelines, and buildings have addresses. But most notable buildings have names that are better as article titles-- 1257:

I'm not familiar with the history, here, but if we're categorizing/tracking accounts a given blocked or banned user has used, previously, it seems to make sense that we'd do the same with IPs. –

2242:

used to redirect to demiliterised zone (DMZ) these are two seperate topics so I created a stub on the demiliterisation.. I think this is probably the best way to handle something like this.--

1361:

No YouTube is not aggressive about purging copyvios from its site. As far as I know, they only remove copyvios in response to Cease & Desist letters or other strongly-worded complaints.

50: 4431:

I don't think it should be necessary, but the fact is these people continue to fight over what their ancestors did to each other. That's as good an example as I can think of for idiocy.

4407:

I went to the link I placed above at the ISO website, which I didn't think was very helpful as I outlined above. Can you give us a better link that would demonstrate what you're saying?

4410:

To me, "Taiwan, Province of China" might make neither side happy but it also does a poor job of describing the actual situation on the ground. We do a much better job with our articles.

4022:

takes. When they're voting members in the UNGA, they're in WP as a nation (or the converse). Then note the existence of the dispute and leave it at that. (A template needed, perhaps?)

2471:

Edward Tufte is the antidote for that. I won't be generating sparklines, but I will try to make the data lumpy and include the same amount of data on either side of interesting data.

2682:

was rejected and I don't think changing NPOV to incorporate it would be a good idea either. Really this is probably one of the only things that consensus would never change on. BTW

2133:

BTW, I am not talking about misspellings, alternate spellings, abbreviations, etc. Obviously, not every one of those would have to be mentioned in the article a redirect points to.--

2498:

about the merits of hiding images because they spoil the medical test supported by the image. Looking at our disclaimers pages, there is a lot of material about wikipedia not hiding

3389: 4549:

Yes, a minority of the world's countries representing a minority of the world's population have recognized Kosovo. On the other hand, the majority of the permanent members of the

4384:

has been progressing. These idiotic racist Balkan factions are always looking for another venue to push their agendae, now they've come to WP. While I'm normally disposed to

4358:'s basic definition works for me. Deciding whether an entity meets that standard is a question for consensus. Obviously (to me), when Britain, America and France recognized 2161:). From my experience, unless there's a compelling reason to do so, most deletion discussions of redirects end in keep. But as Beta said, just depends on the specific case. -- 1168: 3203: 3110: 1195: 1242:

this case? I listed it because it may be useful to be aware it's an IP or IP range he may have access to, if he continues to carry out his threat to edit via sockpuppets

2064: 2118:

to an article that does not specifically mention or discuss the redirected term, may I nominate that redirect for deletion, er, discussion?. Explain why or why not.--

1233:

Is it okay to list a potential IP address as an IPsock, even if the IP address was not being used deceptively at the time? In particularly, I added the template to

3920:

Sounds reasonable to me. The more important thing is that we stop the edit warring. Perhaps a footnote somewhere noting the justification for one over the other. ~

1347:

Good point (although I thought YouTube was pretty aggressive about purging copyvios from its site; isn't that why you can't find Daily Show/Colbert clips there?).

1159: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 3167: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 3705:

standard already calls for more than two-third of the Knowledge (XXG) to be deleted/removed, and nothing but an Encyclopedia Britannica type authoritarian

3399:

practical, and which I vigorously oppose is having policies and guidelines in protected places. Not that we didn't have proposals in that sense, I recall

3083: 2330: 2181: 2138: 2123: 1629:

You clearly broke 3RR, you got blocked, it's over. It happens to a lot of people, it's basically the least egregious thing you can get blocked for.

2379:

Regarding equations given in an article, I'm don't know of specific policy page that excludes them from OR, so believe they should always be cited.--

67: 4036:

Not a good criterion. Switzerland only joined the UN in 2002, but no-one denied that they are a recognized state (and have been for a long time). --

1283:

I've read here and there that you cannot use Youtube as a source, and yet, doing numerous google searching fails to turn up any policy that says so.

2633:

are clearly in disfavor by those in power, and should be rewritten to give a clear direction to the community, and allow uncritical description of

2423:. If I'm going to get an image into the article, I'll have to be bold, which is why I'm making sure that I have my ducks in a row before I do it. 3560:

It does sound strange; third-party sources are generally needed for neutrality and notability, but not necessarily for all fact, in my opinion.

3737:

accountability of contributors (in both cases, none that I am aware of) for inclusion of a term in it to really be taken to signify anything.

2656:

Filll, as an admin who's an ally of yours - albeit not a terribly helpful one - let me plead with you to stop this melodramatic and borderline

3074: 4362:, they were an independent country from that moment onwards, because sufficient military force had committed to Kosovo's survival as a state. 2982: 2280:, where various non-notable shock sites were redirected to the Shock site page, which doesn't cover them, because they are non-notable. So, 45: 40: 3176: 2326: 2177: 2134: 2119: 3199: 3106: 1191: 57: 3779:

page blocked for new users? I had a incident and question to report on there? Or am I mistaken? It seems like I can't edit that page.

4326: 3836:, the author of the article, read material. This may sound obvious, but it means that material the immediate source quotes or cites is 2546:

or not to see the image, rather than just conde,n everybody who had some curiosity about the film? Isn't informed choice a good thing?

2309:

Mangojuice has it right. Often in AfD debates--especially about controversial subjects--people will suggest, for example, we redirect

1176: 1412: 83: 35: 17: 1890: 3480:

I bring it up because I've seen a lot of people leave Knowledge (XXG) over causes boiling down to what it says. It's rather true. -

3400: 3184: 2017:

Others??Sorry! Keeper i couldn't get you. Besides that I don't think that there is any need for street addresses, as mentioned by

94: 2403:

NPOV might apply though. Since manipulating those stylistic options can leave widely different impressions on the casual reader.

2942: 2798: 2479: 2431: 2360: 2293: 1458: 1423: 4389:

language that has been worked out globally (not just amongst wikipedians). "British Indian Ocean Territory" clearly calls it a

3595:(reduced indent) Well, my question was about the general scene. But, it was inspired by a very specific case. Int he article on 2091: 4069: 3953: 3909: 2806:

opposite, it gives priority to new comments and that it makes things slightly easier for threads that are fast to fix (i.e. on

2067:. I don't see why street addresses are all that different. We certainly shouldn't include street addresses for living persons ( 62: 4330: 2269: 4273:- states or not, they are represented globally by larger federal actors. It may not even be possible to determine if they 3279:

Not related at all. The bot only runs one time per day, and makes all the announcements for the day at that moment. — Carl

1835:

one is willing to apply ordinary communication skills. Then achieving things on Knowledge (XXG) becomes quite accessible. -

3927: 3091: 1557: 1503: 4237: 3861: 3840:

subject to verification if there is doubt. It also means that you are responsible for citing the immediate source. (See

3784: 3470: 2821: 1688: 2767:

it to make it clear isn't. Sometimes it's okay to rearrange sequence .... but, usually, using indents to show sequence

1602: 3377:

where they're asked to take policy-setting measures. Now there's a relief, at least one place where the discussion is

2665: 2176:

this can be a disappointing experience. That is why I'd like to see most of these "fruitless" redirects eliminated.--

1352: 1318: 3841: 4347: 3408: 2455: 2273: 1852:

What is the policy on street addresses. I was under the impression that addresses were generally NOT encyclopedic.

3607:, a book and a website complied by Aaron Peckham (a source cited by mainstream news media), it is also known as a 3892: 2621:

unnecessarily confusing. It might benefit everyone if a committee was formed to consider new wording and rewrite

1338: 4493: 4354:

a central authority making a final decision. I obviously have a very utilitarian view of what a state is. The

3525: 2322: 29: 4580: 4041: 3059: 3009: 2570: 2076: 1872: 3706: 3252:

It means a page transcluded to it has had the policy cat added to it. We'll need to check each transclusion.

2420: 4543: 3780: 3466: 3027: 2641:. How do we go about suggesting some sort of communittee or organizing ourselves to get appropriate input?-- 2458:

is abusing the axes of a chart. Be careful with that; and be open to discussion about how to handle that.

1517: 1474: 3795: 1779:

In this case, the admins' actions seemed justified but this isn't really the place to discuss such things.

3697:

It was reverted in quick succession by two different editors (both pretty experienced). The discussion is

2661: 2512: 2148: 1348: 1314: 4339: 4236:

breakaway provinces means that the fact that they have not recognized this new country gets discounted.

4587: 4501: 4440: 4398: 4355: 4308: 4286: 4202: 4027: 3404: 2969: 2394: 2209: 1267: 1218: 4572: 3424: 2115: 1776:

Yes. This is human psychology and Knowledge (XXG) policy totally ignores it, so this place is anarchy.

1388:

or such. At the very least, I'd expect to see time frame specified just as pages in a printed source.--

1213:

My apologies, accidentally copied over the template from another guideline when setting up the page. --

86:. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to revive any of these discussions, either 4591: 4563: 4535: 4505: 4483: 4444: 4426: 4402: 4375: 4312: 4290: 4249: 4206: 4159: 4120: 4085: 4045: 4031: 3973: 3958: 3930: 3914: 3873: 3811: 3788: 3762: 3746: 3715: 3587: 3569: 3551: 3537: 3514: 3493: 3484: 3474: 3457: 3447: 3435: 3412: 3360: 3326: 3313: 3291: 3274: 3260: 3247: 3233: 3215: 3153: 3139: 3122: 3063: 3035: 3012: 2989: 2974: 2841: 2826: 2780: 2756: 2718: 2698: 2669: 2650: 2602: 2574: 2555: 2538: 2516: 2462: 2443: 2412: 2398: 2383: 2334: 2300: 2251: 2213: 2198: 2185: 2170: 2151: 2142: 2127: 2104: 2080: 2043: 2012: 1976: 1949: 1934: 1912: 1902: 1884: 1861: 1839: 1826: 1802: 1760: 1736: 1717: 1694: 1678: 1643: 1623: 1578: 1560: 1544: 1521: 1506: 1482: 1444: 1402: 1370: 1356: 1342: 1322: 1295: 1272: 1251: 1222: 1207: 4531: 3969: 2939: 2795: 2476: 2428: 2357: 1898: 1857: 1649: 1574: 1540: 1455: 1420: 4555: 4418: 4367: 4241: 4112: 3802:, but it is a rare occurrence that ANI is protected. (And yes, it was semi protected on March 1) - 3722: 3575: 3266: 3239: 3145: 1876: 1728: 1635: 4568: 4559: 4422: 4417:

will get worked out, if past history is a guide. We have mechanisms for discouraging POV pushing.

4371: 4245: 4151: 4116: 4037: 4019: 3951: 3907: 3798:

for short periods when there is heavy amounts of vandalism to it. As an alternative you could try

3658: 3624: 3529: 3352: 3270: 3243: 3211: 3149: 3118: 3055: 3005: 3001: 2837: 2566: 2310: 2243: 2205: 2166: 2096: 2072: 1919: 1880: 1732: 1639: 1440: 1247: 1234: 1203: 3521: 3370: 2634: 2630: 2318: 4479: 4334: 4155: 4081: 3546: 3533: 3442: 3356: 3020: 2598: 2551: 2534: 2314: 2247: 2100: 1999: 1685: 1513: 1467: 4076:

is considered a country (except by China), yet the it was thrown out of the General Assembly. --

3864:

addresses the point directly but I feel the principle needs to be expressed higher up the tree.

2657: 2626: 1329:

Also keep in mind that we don't link to copyvios, so that excludes a YouTube clip of a TV show.

4576: 3674: 3641: 4413:

I don't think you should refer to any contributors as "idiot racists". And this situation on

4343: 3924: 3807: 3757: 3710: 3509: 2752: 2675: 2508: 1945: 1868: 1798: 1554: 1500: 1395: 1334: 1291: 4257: 3578:, although it's not unusual in my experience to find those permissions a little restrictive. 3441:

it seems to ignore the gnomes quietly editing away with little interaction with other users.

3428: 3374: 3050: 3043: 2952: 2733: 2705: 2687: 2679: 2622: 2614: 4583: 4497: 4436: 4394: 4304: 4282: 4198: 4023: 3869: 3604: 3229: 2961: 2818: 2408: 2390: 2239: 1691: 1366: 1259: 1214: 4385: 3776: 3505: 2807: 2683: 2158: 2068: 1653: 1630: 1310: 1302: 4527: 3965: 3698: 3583: 3565: 3489:

It's also belied by its shortness, for the perceptive. That will become clear over time. -

3310: 2935: 2791: 2714: 2646: 2472: 2424: 2353: 2290: 2018: 1894: 1853: 1782:

It's best not to worry about Knowledge (XXG) quality or have any expectation of achieving

1648:

You are true i broke it and admitted it! I would have forgotten it if I haven't seen this

1570: 1536: 1451: 1416: 1237:. The evidence that it is Haizum is on the page and seems fairly clear cut to me. However 3857: 3799: 2369: 1432: 1306: 4342:, the basis of the way we make decisions, works very well in many, many cases. Look at 2867:

But then what's the point of having both styles when you can't use one with top-posting?

4228: 3940: 3896: 3490: 3481: 3454: 3432: 3207: 3114: 2833: 2419:

I have a strong suspicion that anything challenging the consensus will be rejected per

2162: 1836: 1436: 1243: 1199: 4489: 3853: 3823: 1982: 4475: 4077: 3990:

There are a number of states that are not universally accepted as nations. IIRC, PR

3742: 3286: 2986: 2776: 2638: 2594: 2547: 2530: 2440: 2380: 2026: 2005: 1993: 1959: 1909: 1809: 1743: 1700: 1661: 1606: 1385: 3921: 3803: 3320: 3254: 3133: 2747: 2692: 2459: 1941: 1793: 1551: 1497: 1391: 1330: 1287: 2523: 2495: 1908:

I wouldn't go enumerating the addresses of every building on a university campus.

1889:

No. Those are obviously encyclopedic. But I am not sure why school addresses (see

1154:

Knowledge (XXG):Guide for nominating good articles has been marked as a guideline

4432: 4381: 3865: 3225: 2812: 2404: 2372:

is the policy you're looking for. To paraphrase, yes editor-created images are

1958:

article which also lists cell phone numbers. Is this considered encyclopedic? --

1657: 1362: 1238: 3018:

I'd say just go ahead and remove it. This information belongs on Wikisource.

4278: 4232: 3596: 3579: 3561: 2740:

the bottom or the top, hence the reason why we're in this mess to begin with.

2710: 2642: 2565:

seen the image, it is severely flawed anyways. But that is not our problem. --

2285: 2277: 2192: 3725:, which allows self-published sources to be used as sources about themselves. 4390: 4266: 4011: 4007: 3939:

So, should I make sure that articles say the country is Kosovo, not Serbia?

3162:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation/2006-02-01 has been marked as a policy

3738: 3282: 2772: 2281: 2022: 1955: 3131:

appears to be a work in progress that has been prematurely transcluded.

4300: 4194: 2025:

also lists street addresses, so does it seem encyclopedic to anyone? --

4303:

say?" It coincides nicely with all the WP management tools that way.

2588:

required someone to not be exposed to it is just your POV. Actually,

4414: 4359: 4270: 4073: 4015: 4003: 3999: 3069:

Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all rules/Workshop has been marked as a policy

4571:

has direct discussion of some disputed names while omitting others.

2787:

Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.

4262: 3995: 3991: 1605:

a bit biased? I am saying this after having experience of this. --

1313:

for more information about this and other self-published sources.

3465:

Why is he bringing this up here? That essay is painfully short.

1786:

on Knowledge (XXG), or else you're going to eventually go crazy.

4550: 4329:

takes unlike entities and gives them equal standing. Example:

3842:

Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources#Say where you found the material

1723:

go to his contributions, and hit the very small button called "

3545:

examples of who Mr B is so editors could give further advice.

2959:

A bit more emphasis might not hurt, but I think it's there. –

2742: 2272:, which redirected (until just now, when I R3-speedied it) to 2238:

Just an example of what I think the poster is talking about..

1788: 3390:

Knowledge (XXG):How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance

2684:

Knowledge (XXG):RFC#Request_comment_on_policy_and_conventions

90:

a new thread or use the talk page associated with that topic.

4366:

foreign-policy perspective that speak different languages.

3690:, page 269, Andrews McMeel Publishing, 2005, ISBN 0740751433 1808:

Sorry! for making an issue, which wasn't an issue at all! --

82:

This page contains discussions that have been archived from

1601:

Isn't the attitude of Administrators in the application of

1569:

Agreed, but why even split Further reading/ External links?

2763:

Indents. Editing someone else's comment is offensive, but

1940:

have addresses listed? What about their global branches?

4579:

they say why. Another lengthier discussion from 2001 is

3818:

Promote definition of "source" in verifiability policies

2771:

is better. There are already guidelines, actually.... --

2389:

just doesn't apply because there's no research involved.

1893:) are encyclopedic. Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory. 3826: 3751:

This sounds pretty reasonable. If this doesn't include

3306: 3192: 3188: 3180: 3172: 3129: 3099: 3095: 3087: 3079: 2736:. Would anyone here be willing to make it a guideline? 1989: 1724: 1184: 1180: 1172: 1164: 87: 4333:

is on the list and has a top-level code. But it's an

3822:

Please consider the following language to be added to

3520:

If it is for real, then presumably it's overridden by

1867:

Example article? I doubt that you are thinking about

3891:

independence. Because as far as I can tell, based on

2852:

Knowledge (XXG) is set up for bottom-posting, anyway.

2092:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Categorization#Hidden categories

2065:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geographical coordinates

4380:We can all see how well the rational discussion at 3427:, which was inspired by a discussion last night at 2953:

Knowledge (XXG):Talk#Technical and format standards

3504:Apparently Knowledge (XXG) policies (most notably 2924:I get two bullets beside the reply instead of one. 2690:would be the places to get a discussion together. 2522:This issue has been addressed, somewhat, already: 1160:Knowledge (XXG):Guide for nominating good articles 3403:most prominently, discussed in central places. -- 3054:heads-up here to broaden attention to the issue. 3688:Urban Dictionary: Fularious Street Slang Defined 3168:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation/2006-02-01 1411:I'm curious as to how YouTube is different from 4299:How about the straightforward test: "What does 4195:Country#Nation, country and state: a comparison 3349:which has been advertised on that central page 3144:I commented out the official policy category. 3852:Please discuss in the appropriate section on 8: 3366:Most of what you propose would be practical. 2454:One of the classic techniques in documented 2268:Probably a better example is something like 1465:Where is WikiWorld being used as a source? 3856:. There is a related passage suggested for 2996:Fables and Parables - source text inclusion 2981:I take this opportunity to again reference 3318:(ec) Thanks for beating me...by 5 seconds 1699:Sorry! but i couldn't find him blocked! -- 3198:has recently been edited to mark it as a 3105:has recently been edited to mark it as a 3075:Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all rules/Workshop 2909:I can change this by using colons instead 2732:This doesn't appear to be a guideline at 1190:has recently been edited to mark it as a 4488:Turns out the ISO3166 codes derive from 4277:a foreign policy on the independence of 3733:be a bit more reliable than the website. 4599: 3616: 2270:Death of Internet predicted, film at 11 1384:think) any standard citation format in 4575:they include Taiwan as a province and 1301:That's probably a better question for 3344:be advertised before being acted on. 2983:User:Dcoetzee/Why wikithreads are bad 2790:Why is top-posting such a bad thing? 2502:material for spoiler reasons but the 1392:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy) 7: 3401:Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy pages 2494:There is currently a hot discussion 2063:We have an active geocoding project 1992:. Do you know of others Smsarmad? 3384:We used to have a well-advertised 2370:Knowledge (XXG):Or#Original_images 2090:There is a discussion underway at 24: 2276:. A similar thing happened with 1891:Template:Infobox Secondary school 1450:(appropriately-licensed) videos. 3238:Hasn't been edited since 2007. 2724:Put your comments AT THE BOTTOM. 2593:without any legal repurcussions. 1981: 1831:What Zenwhat said above is true 1592: 4070:United Nations General Assembly 3373:have generally refused to take 3049:There is an effort underway at 2890:Or by editing the original post 2678:on the matter. But seriously, 2327:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 2178:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 2135:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 2120:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 4331:British Indian Ocean Territory 2934:If I write a bulleted comment 2802:2008 February 24, 18:22 (UTC) 2435:2008 February 28, 05:24 (UTC) 2364:2008 February 27, 17:00 (UTC) 1462:2008 February 23, 20:53 (UTC) 1427:2008 February 22, 18:11 (UTC) 1: 4536:23:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4506:22:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4484:18:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4445:17:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4427:16:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4403:15:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4376:13:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 4313:23:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 4291:15:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 4250:05:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 4207:03:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 4160:23:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 4121:13:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 4086:00:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 4046:00:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 4032:23:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 3974:23:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 3959:20:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 3931:03:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 3915:23:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 3327:19:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3314:19:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3292:19:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3275:19:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3261:19:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3248:18:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3234:18:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3216:18:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3154:19:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3140:19:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3123:18:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3064:15:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3036:23:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 3013:04:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2990:18:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 2975:07:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 2951:This is briefly mentioned at 2946:2008 February 26, 06:33 (UTC) 2842:04:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 2827:13:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 2781:16:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 2757:16:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 2719:17:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2699:16:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2670:16:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2651:15:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2625:in that case. In particular, 2603:14:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2575:23:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2556:22:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2539:22:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2517:20:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2483:2008 February 28, 14:58 (UTC) 2463:05:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2444:07:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2413:23:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2399:20:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2384:18:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2335:05:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2301:03:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2252:03:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2214:02:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2199:02:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2186:02:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2171:02:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2152:01:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2143:01:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2128:01:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 2105:08:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2081:16:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2044:16:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2013:16:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1977:16:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1950:14:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1935:20:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1913:20:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1903:20:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1885:20:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1862:19:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1840:19:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1827:20:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1803:19:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1761:20:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1737:20:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1718:19:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1695:19:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1679:18:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1644:18:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1624:16:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1579:06:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1561:03:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 1545:22:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1522:18:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1507:03:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 1483:23:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1445:16:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1403:14:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1371:15:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1357:11:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1343:11:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1323:09:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1296:09:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1273:05:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1252:04:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1223:05:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1208:18:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 78:Village pump (policy) archive 4435:wasn't bad enough for them? 4240:should be our chief guide. 2490:Disclaimers/Factual spoilers 2323:Criticism of Knowledge (XXG) 2086:Hidden categories discussion 1742:Sorry! i missed that log! -- 2343:are graphs of equations OR? 4623: 4348:Political status of Taiwan 3893:Image:Kosovo relations.svg 3659:The Year in Buzzwords 2006 2456:How to Lie with Statistics 2274:List of Internet phenomena 1875:is a disambiguation page. 1590: 4592:18:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 4564:01:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3874:18:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC) 3812:00:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 3789:20:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3763:15:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC) 3747:13:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC) 3716:11:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC) 3625:From abandonware to Zelda 3599:, I added the following: 3588:14:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3570:14:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3552:12:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3538:12:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3515:12:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3494:22:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3485:22:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3475:21:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3458:22:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3448:21:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3436:20:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3413:12:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 3361:11:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 4072:should be the standard. 1873:1600 Pennsylvania Avenue 3721:You should be aware of 3846: 3613: 2319:Knowledge (XXG) Review 95:< Older discussions 4526:vandalism won't stop. 4356:Montevideo Convention 4258:neutral point of view 3830: 3601: 2613:Committee to rewrite 1990:Phone numbers removed 84:Village pump (policy) 4496:is also interesting. 4197:but no clear answer. 3794:Occasionally ANI is 3665:, Decembers 17, 2006 2929:and I want to reply, 2769:within some exchange 2734:Knowledge (XXG):Talk 2704:I am not suggesting 4020:UN General Assembly 3862:WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT 3642:Bottom of the class 3574:In fact, check out 3002:Fables and Parables 2021:, and this article 1279:Youtube as a source 1235:User:128.227.51.157 4335:overseas territory 4068:I don't think the 4014:doesn't recognize 4006:doesn't recognize 3994:doesn't recognize 3832:A source is where 3781:Average White Dork 3677:, Urban Dictionary 3631:, November 12 2007 3467:Average White Dork 3206:of the change. -- 3113:of the change. -- 2676:standing committee 2315:Internet Phenomena 1198:of the change. -- 4386:assume good faith 4344:Republic of China 3879:Serbia vs. Kosovo 3707:academic standard 3290: 2662:Sarcasticidealist 2009: 1869:10 Downing Street 1739: 1433:unreliable source 1349:Sarcasticidealist 1315:Sarcasticidealist 4614: 4607: 4606:Urban Dictionary 4604: 3949: 3946: 3943: 3905: 3902: 3899: 3760: 3713: 3691: 3684: 3678: 3672: 3666: 3655: 3649: 3648:, April 11, 2006 3638: 3632: 3623:Jack Schofield, 3621: 3605:Urban Dictionary 3549: 3512: 3500:Quoting a person 3445: 3405:Francis Schonken 3323: 3280: 3257: 3204:automated notice 3197: 3196: 3136: 3111:automated notice 3104: 3103: 3034: 3030: 3023: 2973: 2966: 2955:(under layout): 2825: 2824: 2750: 2745: 2695: 2298: 2240:Demilitarisation 2196: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2010: 2007: 2002: 1996: 1985: 1974: 1969: 1964: 1954:What about this 1932: 1927: 1924: 1848:street addresses 1824: 1819: 1814: 1796: 1791: 1758: 1753: 1748: 1722: 1715: 1710: 1705: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1596: 1595: 1481: 1477: 1470: 1400: 1398: 1271: 1264: 1196:automated notice 1189: 1188: 79: 54: 4622: 4621: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4605: 4601: 3956: 3947: 3944: 3941: 3912: 3903: 3900: 3897: 3881: 3820: 3773: 3758: 3711: 3695: 3694: 3686:Aaron Peckham, 3685: 3681: 3673: 3669: 3657:Carolyn Sayre, 3656: 3652: 3639: 3635: 3622: 3618: 3548:Dan Beale-Cocks 3547: 3526:WP:Common sense 3510: 3502: 3444:Dan Beale-Cocks 3443: 3421: 3395:The only thing 3337: 3321: 3255: 3170: 3166: 3164: 3134: 3077: 3073: 3071: 3047: 3033: 3028: 3021: 3019: 2998: 2962: 2960: 2945: 2817: 2811: 2801: 2746: 2741: 2726: 2693: 2674:Well we have a 2618: 2492: 2482: 2434: 2363: 2345: 2294: 2194: 2112: 2110:Redirect policy 2088: 2037: 2032: 2027: 2019:User:Kingturtle 2006: 2000: 1994: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1928: 1925: 1920: 1850: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1792: 1787: 1754: 1749: 1744: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1650:User:BebackKeys 1617: 1612: 1607: 1603:Blocking Policy 1599: 1598: 1593: 1589: 1587:Blocking Policy 1532: 1480: 1475: 1468: 1466: 1461: 1426: 1401: 1396: 1390: 1281: 1260: 1258: 1231: 1162: 1158: 1156: 1151: 80: 77: 74: 48: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4620: 4618: 4609: 4608: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4547: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4411: 4408: 4363: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4294: 4293: 4229:Cayman Islands 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4038:Stephan Schulz 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3954: 3934: 3933: 3910: 3889: 3880: 3877: 3819: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3796:semi-protected 3772: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3734: 3726: 3693: 3692: 3679: 3667: 3650: 3633: 3615: 3614: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3572: 3555: 3554: 3541: 3540: 3501: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3487: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3393: 3382: 3367: 3336: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3222:raises eyebrow 3163: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3070: 3067: 3056:Raymond Arritt 3046: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3025: 2997: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2978: 2977: 2948: 2947: 2938: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2854: 2853: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2829: 2794: 2784: 2783: 2725: 2722: 2709:frustration.-- 2702: 2701: 2672: 2617: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2567:Stephan Schulz 2559: 2558: 2542: 2541: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2475: 2466: 2465: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2427: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2377: 2356: 2344: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2304: 2303: 2284:redirected to 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2154: 2111: 2108: 2087: 2084: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1564: 1563: 1531: 1530:External links 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1472: 1454: 1419: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1389: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1326: 1325: 1284: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1230: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1155: 1152: 92: 76: 75: 73: 72: 71: 70: 65: 60: 55: 43: 38: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4619: 4603: 4600: 4593: 4589: 4585: 4582: 4578: 4574: 4570: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4552: 4548: 4545: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4490:this UN table 4487: 4486: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4409: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4364: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4259: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4230: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3957: 3952: 3950: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3932: 3929: 3926: 3923: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3913: 3908: 3906: 3894: 3887: 3878: 3876: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3850: 3845: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3829: 3827: 3825: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3770: 3764: 3761: 3754: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3735: 3732: 3727: 3724: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3714: 3708: 3702: 3700: 3689: 3683: 3680: 3676: 3675:Pull me thong 3671: 3668: 3664: 3663:Time Magazine 3660: 3654: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3640:John Harris, 3637: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3620: 3617: 3612: 3610: 3609:pull me thong 3606: 3603:According to 3600: 3598: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3553: 3550: 3543: 3542: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3513: 3507: 3499: 3495: 3492: 3488: 3486: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3459: 3456: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3446: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3381:taking place. 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3345: 3343: 3335:Policy policy 3334: 3328: 3325: 3324: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3312: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3293: 3288: 3284: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3202:. This is an 3201: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3169: 3161: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3138: 3137: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3109:. This is an 3108: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3076: 3068: 3066: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3052: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3032: 3031: 3024: 3022:Corvus cornix 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2995: 2991: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2979: 2976: 2971: 2967: 2965: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2949: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2928: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2851: 2850: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2830: 2828: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2809: 2804: 2803: 2800: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2786: 2785: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2744: 2737: 2735: 2730: 2723: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2707: 2700: 2697: 2696: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2639:pseudoscience 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2616: 2612: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2591: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2489: 2481: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2452: 2445: 2442: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2349: 2342: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2311:Brian Peppers 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2155: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2109: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2093: 2085: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2011: 2003: 1997: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1931: 1923: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1847: 1841: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1818: 1813: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1777: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1741: 1740: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1670: 1665: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1604: 1586: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1556: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1529: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514:Sparkygravity 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1471: 1469:Corvus cornix 1464: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1428: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1415:. Opinions? 1414: 1410: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1393: 1387: 1386:Harvard style 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1265: 1263: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1194:. This is an 1193: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1161: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 370: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 96: 91: 89: 85: 69: 68:Miscellaneous 66: 64: 61: 59: 56: 52: 47: 44: 42: 39: 37: 34: 33: 32: 31: 27: 26: 19: 4602: 4569:This UN list 4524: 4351: 4340:WP:CONSENSUS 4274: 4238:Common sense 4231:think about 4225: 3886:ad infinitum 3885: 3882: 3851: 3847: 3837: 3833: 3831: 3821: 3774: 3752: 3730: 3709:to prevail. 3703: 3696: 3687: 3682: 3670: 3662: 3653: 3646:The Guardian 3645: 3636: 3629:The Guardian 3628: 3619: 3608: 3602: 3594: 3503: 3464: 3422: 3396: 3385: 3378: 3375:Arbcom cases 3348: 3346: 3341: 3338: 3319: 3253: 3221: 3165: 3132: 3072: 3048: 3042:Activity at 3026: 3000:The article 2999: 2963: 2956: 2813: 2768: 2764: 2738: 2731: 2727: 2703: 2691: 2619: 2589: 2526: 2509:Fredrick day 2503: 2499: 2493: 2373: 2350: 2346: 2295: 2113: 2089: 2062: 2038: 2033: 2028: 1986: 1971: 1966: 1961: 1929: 1921: 1851: 1832: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1673: 1668: 1663: 1618: 1613: 1608: 1600: 1533: 1473: 1282: 1261: 1232: 1157: 511: 368: 97: 93: 81: 30:Village pump 28: 4584:LeadSongDog 4498:LeadSongDog 4494:ISO3166 FAQ 4437:LeadSongDog 4433:World War I 4395:LeadSongDog 4382:Talk:Kosovo 4305:LeadSongDog 4283:LeadSongDog 4256:to claim a 4199:LeadSongDog 4024:LeadSongDog 3775:Why is the 3771:ANI locked? 3425:WP:SOW/REAP 3423:Please see 3371:arbitrators 2964:Luna Santin 2660:silliness. 2529:to see it? 2421:IDONTLIKEIT 2391:LeadSongDog 1658:Scientology 1262:Luna Santin 1239:User:Haizum 1215:Nehrams2020 4528:Tom.mevlie 4279:Pirate Bay 4233:East Timor 3966:Coppertwig 3723:WP:SELFPUB 3597:Whale tail 3576:WP:SELFPUB 3369:Note that 2936:superluser 2792:superluser 2637:areas and 2473:superluser 2425:superluser 2354:superluser 2286:Shock site 2278:Shock site 2147:example?? 2114:If a page 2008:Disclaimer 1895:Kingturtle 1854:Kingturtle 1652:violating 1571:Sparafucil 1537:Sparafucil 1512:Daxflame-- 1452:superluser 1417:superluser 100:Archives: 51:persistent 4556:Darkspots 4419:Darkspots 4391:territory 4368:Darkspots 4327:This list 4267:Hong Kong 4242:Darkspots 4113:Darkspots 4012:Palestine 4008:Kurdistan 3522:WP:IGNORE 3491:GTBacchus 3482:GTBacchus 3455:GTBacchus 3433:GTBacchus 3419:New Essay 3386:guideline 3267:Darkspots 3240:Darkspots 3208:VeblenBot 3146:Darkspots 3115:VeblenBot 2834:Nil Einne 2765:formating 2658:WP:POINTy 2635:WP:FRINGE 2631:WP:FRINGE 2500:fictional 2439:change.-- 2374:generally 2163:MZMcBride 2159:WP:CSD#R3 2116:redirects 1877:Darkspots 1837:GTBacchus 1729:Darkspots 1725:block log 1636:Darkspots 1437:J Milburn 1413:WikiWorld 1244:Nil Einne 1200:VeblenBot 1192:guideline 46:Proposals 41:Technical 4476:Faustian 4152:Shniken1 4078:SMP0328. 3530:Kotniski 3353:Kotniski 3224:whaa? -- 2987:Dcoetzee 2627:WP:UNDUE 2595:Faustian 2548:Faustian 2531:Faustian 2527:everyone 2441:jwanders 2381:jwanders 2368:I think 2282:Meatspin 2244:Shniken1 2206:Wikidemo 2097:Kotniski 2023:Sargodha 1956:Sargodha 1910:Dcoetzee 1784:anything 1597:Resolved 58:Idea lab 4544:Sealand 4492:. The 4352:without 4301:ISO3166 3804:Rjd0060 3429:WP:AN/I 3322:MBisanz 3256:MBisanz 3181:history 3135:MBisanz 3088:history 3051:WP:NPOV 3044:WP:NPOV 2748:Zenwhat 2706:WP:SPOV 2694:MBisanz 2688:WP:CENT 2680:WP:SPOV 2623:WP:NPOV 2615:WP:NPOV 2504:factual 2460:GRBerry 1942:Rfwoolf 1794:Zenwhat 1331:Puchiko 1288:Rfwoolf 1229:IP sock 1173:history 4415:Kosovo 4360:Kosovo 4271:Hawaii 4111:one. 4074:Taiwan 4016:Israel 4004:Turkey 4000:Taiwan 3866:Mangoe 3777:WP:ANI 3759:Aditya 3712:Aditya 3511:Aditya 3506:WP:SPS 3226:Golbez 3200:policy 3107:policy 3006:Kiyarr 2814:x42bn6 2808:WP:NCP 2405:Taemyr 2069:WP:BLP 1995:Keeper 1833:unless 1686:Onorem 1654:WP:3RR 1631:WP:3RR 1363:Mike R 1311:WP:SPS 1303:WP:RSN 36:Policy 4263:Wales 3996:Tibet 3992:China 3858:WP:RS 3800:WP:AN 3580:SamBC 3562:SamBC 3524:(see 3311:Pomte 3307:Fixed 3189:watch 3185:links 3128:This 3096:watch 3092:links 2711:Filll 2643:Filll 2296:juice 2291:Mango 1987:Fixed 1930:Start 1922:Credo 1397:talk 1339:email 1307:WP:RS 1181:watch 1177:links 88:start 16:< 4588:talk 4581:here 4577:here 4573:here 4560:talk 4551:UNSC 4532:talk 4502:talk 4480:talk 4441:talk 4423:talk 4399:talk 4372:talk 4325:No. 4309:talk 4287:talk 4275:have 4246:talk 4203:talk 4156:talk 4117:talk 4082:talk 4042:talk 4028:talk 3970:talk 3955:adds 3911:adds 3870:talk 3854:WP:V 3838:also 3824:WP:V 3808:talk 3785:talk 3743:talk 3699:here 3584:talk 3566:talk 3534:talk 3528:).-- 3471:talk 3409:talk 3357:talk 3342:must 3287:talk 3271:talk 3244:talk 3230:talk 3212:talk 3193:logs 3177:talk 3173:edit 3150:talk 3119:talk 3100:logs 3084:talk 3080:edit 3060:talk 3029:talk 2970:talk 2838:talk 2822:Mess 2819:Talk 2777:talk 2753:talk 2715:talk 2686:and 2666:talk 2647:talk 2629:and 2599:talk 2590:most 2571:talk 2552:talk 2535:talk 2513:talk 2496:here 2409:talk 2395:talk 2331:talk 2248:talk 2210:talk 2195:ASEM 2182:talk 2167:talk 2139:talk 2124:talk 2101:talk 2077:talk 1946:talk 1926:From 1899:talk 1881:talk 1858:talk 1799:talk 1733:talk 1640:talk 1575:talk 1541:talk 1518:talk 1476:talk 1441:talk 1367:talk 1353:talk 1335:Talk 1319:talk 1292:talk 1268:talk 1248:talk 1219:talk 1204:talk 1185:logs 1169:talk 1165:edit 4474:so. 4269:or 4010:. 4002:. 3998:or 3948:noy 3945:ela 3942:J.d 3922:MDD 3904:noy 3901:ela 3898:J.d 3834:you 3753:all 3739:TSP 3731:may 3431:. - 3397:not 3379:not 3309:. – 3283:CBM 3010:ton 3008:lls 2773:Abd 2321:to 2317:or 2313:to 2073:agr 2004:| 1998:| 1727:". 1692:Dil 1656:at 1552:MDD 1498:MDD 1148:195 1144:194 1140:193 1136:192 1132:191 1128:190 1124:189 1120:188 1116:187 1112:186 1108:185 1104:184 1100:183 1096:182 1092:181 1088:180 1084:179 1080:178 1076:177 1072:176 1068:175 1064:174 1060:173 1056:172 1052:171 1048:170 1044:169 1040:168 1036:167 1032:166 1028:165 1024:164 1020:163 1016:162 1012:161 1008:160 1004:159 1000:158 996:157 992:156 988:155 984:154 980:153 976:152 972:151 968:150 964:149 960:148 956:147 952:146 948:145 944:144 940:143 936:142 932:141 928:140 924:139 920:138 916:137 912:136 908:135 904:134 900:133 896:132 892:131 888:130 884:129 880:128 876:127 872:126 868:125 864:124 860:123 856:122 852:121 848:120 844:119 840:118 836:117 832:116 828:115 824:114 820:113 816:112 812:111 808:110 804:109 800:108 796:107 792:106 788:105 784:104 780:103 776:102 772:101 768:100 63:WMF 4590:) 4562:) 4534:) 4504:) 4482:) 4443:) 4425:) 4401:) 4374:) 4311:) 4289:) 4265:, 4248:) 4205:) 4158:) 4150:-- 4119:) 4084:) 4044:) 4030:) 3972:) 3928:96 3925:46 3888:. 3872:) 3860:. 3844:.) 3828:: 3810:) 3787:) 3745:) 3661:, 3644:, 3627:, 3586:) 3568:) 3536:) 3473:) 3411:) 3359:) 3285:· 3273:) 3246:) 3232:) 3214:) 3191:| 3187:| 3183:| 3179:| 3175:| 3152:) 3121:) 3098:| 3094:| 3090:| 3086:| 3082:| 3062:) 2840:) 2779:) 2755:) 2717:) 2668:) 2649:) 2601:) 2573:) 2554:) 2537:) 2515:) 2507:-- 2411:) 2397:) 2333:) 2250:) 2212:) 2184:) 2169:) 2141:) 2126:) 2103:) 2095:-- 2079:) 2001:76 1948:) 1901:) 1883:) 1860:) 1801:) 1735:) 1684:-- 1642:) 1577:) 1558:96 1555:46 1543:) 1520:) 1504:96 1501:46 1443:) 1369:) 1355:) 1341:) 1321:) 1294:) 1250:) 1221:) 1206:) 1183:| 1179:| 1175:| 1171:| 1167:| 1146:, 1142:, 1138:, 1134:, 1130:, 1126:, 1122:, 1118:, 1114:, 1110:, 1106:, 1102:, 1098:, 1094:, 1090:, 1086:, 1082:, 1078:, 1074:, 1070:, 1066:, 1062:, 1058:, 1054:, 1050:, 1046:, 1042:, 1038:, 1034:, 1030:, 1026:, 1022:, 1018:, 1014:, 1010:, 1006:, 1002:, 998:, 994:, 990:, 986:, 982:, 978:, 974:, 970:, 966:, 962:, 958:, 954:, 950:, 946:, 942:, 938:, 934:, 930:, 926:, 922:, 918:, 914:, 910:, 906:, 902:, 898:, 894:, 890:, 886:, 882:, 878:, 874:, 870:, 866:, 862:, 858:, 854:, 850:, 846:, 842:, 838:, 834:, 830:, 826:, 822:, 818:, 814:, 810:, 806:, 802:, 798:, 794:, 790:, 786:, 782:, 778:, 774:, 770:, 766:, 764:99 762:, 760:98 758:, 756:97 754:, 752:96 750:, 748:95 746:, 744:94 742:, 740:93 738:, 736:92 734:, 732:91 730:, 728:90 726:, 724:89 722:, 720:88 718:, 716:87 714:, 712:86 710:, 708:85 706:, 704:84 702:, 700:83 698:, 696:82 694:, 692:81 690:, 688:80 686:, 684:79 682:, 680:78 678:, 676:77 674:, 672:76 670:, 668:75 666:, 664:74 662:, 660:73 658:, 656:72 654:, 652:71 650:, 648:70 646:, 644:69 642:, 640:68 638:, 636:67 634:, 632:66 630:, 628:65 626:, 624:64 622:, 620:63 618:, 616:62 614:, 612:61 610:, 608:60 606:, 604:59 602:, 600:58 598:, 596:57 594:, 592:56 590:, 588:55 586:, 584:54 582:, 580:53 578:, 576:52 574:, 572:51 570:, 568:50 566:, 564:49 562:, 560:48 558:, 556:47 554:, 552:46 550:, 548:45 546:, 544:44 542:, 540:43 538:, 536:42 534:, 532:41 530:, 528:40 526:, 524:39 522:, 520:38 518:, 516:37 514:, 512:36 510:, 508:35 506:, 504:34 502:, 500:33 498:, 496:32 494:, 492:31 490:, 488:30 486:, 484:29 482:, 480:28 478:, 476:27 474:, 472:26 470:, 468:25 466:, 464:24 462:, 460:23 458:, 456:22 454:, 452:21 450:, 448:20 446:, 444:19 442:, 440:18 438:, 436:17 434:, 432:16 430:, 428:15 426:, 424:14 422:, 420:13 418:, 416:12 414:, 412:11 410:, 408:10 406:, 402:, 398:, 394:, 390:, 386:, 382:, 378:, 374:, 366:BO 364:, 362:BN 360:, 358:BM 356:, 354:BL 352:, 350:BK 348:, 346:BJ 344:, 342:BI 340:, 338:BH 336:, 334:BG 332:, 330:BF 328:, 326:BE 324:, 322:BD 320:, 318:BC 316:, 314:BB 312:, 310:BA 308:, 306:AZ 304:, 302:AY 300:, 298:AX 296:, 294:AW 292:, 290:AV 288:, 286:AU 284:, 282:AT 280:, 278:AS 276:, 274:AR 272:, 270:AQ 268:, 266:AP 264:, 262:AO 260:, 258:AN 256:, 254:AM 252:, 250:AL 248:, 246:AK 244:, 242:AJ 240:, 238:AI 236:, 234:AH 232:, 230:AG 228:, 226:AF 224:, 222:AE 220:, 218:AD 216:, 214:AC 212:, 210:AB 208:, 206:AA 204:, 200:, 196:, 192:, 188:, 184:, 180:, 176:, 172:, 168:, 164:, 160:, 156:, 152:, 148:, 144:, 140:, 136:, 132:, 128:, 124:, 120:, 116:, 112:, 108:, 104:, 4586:( 4558:( 4546:. 4530:( 4500:( 4478:( 4439:( 4421:( 4397:( 4370:( 4307:( 4285:( 4281:. 4244:( 4201:( 4154:( 4115:( 4080:( 4040:( 4026:( 3968:( 3868:( 3806:( 3783:( 3741:( 3611:. 3582:( 3564:( 3532:( 3469:( 3453:- 3407:( 3392:. 3355:( 3289:) 3281:( 3269:( 3242:( 3228:( 3210:( 3195:) 3171:( 3148:( 3117:( 3102:) 3078:( 3058:( 2972:) 2968:( 2943:c 2940:t 2836:( 2799:c 2796:t 2775:( 2751:( 2743:☯ 2713:( 2664:( 2645:( 2597:( 2569:( 2550:( 2533:( 2511:( 2480:c 2477:t 2432:c 2429:t 2407:( 2393:( 2361:c 2358:t 2329:( 2246:( 2208:( 2193:M 2180:( 2165:( 2157:( 2149:β 2137:( 2122:( 2099:( 2075:( 2039:S 2034:M 2029:S 1972:S 1967:M 1962:S 1944:( 1897:( 1879:( 1856:( 1822:S 1817:M 1812:S 1797:( 1789:☯ 1756:S 1751:M 1746:S 1731:( 1713:S 1708:M 1703:S 1689:♠ 1674:S 1669:M 1664:S 1638:( 1619:S 1614:M 1609:S 1573:( 1539:( 1516:( 1459:c 1456:t 1439:( 1424:c 1421:t 1394:| 1365:( 1351:( 1337:- 1333:( 1317:( 1290:( 1270:) 1266:( 1246:( 1217:( 1202:( 1187:) 1163:( 404:9 400:8 396:7 392:6 388:5 384:4 380:3 376:2 372:1 369:· 202:Z 198:Y 194:X 190:W 186:V 182:U 178:T 174:S 170:R 166:Q 162:P 158:O 154:N 150:M 146:L 142:K 138:J 134:I 130:H 126:G 122:F 118:E 114:D 110:C 106:B 102:A 98:· 53:) 49:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Village pump (policy)/Archive 36 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index