255:. Straw polls have been used on Knowledge (XXG) for such purposes almost since the beginning of the project. Straw polls typically don't have opening and closing times. Instead, they give editors a chance to chip in with an indication of their opinion, together with a short summary of the reasoning that corresponds to that opinion. It's a good idea to keep a more detailed reasoning in mind given the likelihood that your opinon will be challenged. A call for a straw poll may trigger discussions instead—that's not a failure, it just means that the issue is not clear-cut, which is what the poll set out to determine in the first place.
648:
surprise if suddenly the whole poll morph into a discussion, or if you find yourself "badgered" about a valuable oppose position that you are holding. (It's an artifact: if there's an 80% cutoff, and you are currently opposing, and your opinion is reasoned and clear, your opinion can suddenly be worth as much as that of 3 or 4 other people! It's almost
84:
44:
269:: A straw poll is not a binding vote, or a way to beat dissenters over the head with the will of the majority. If a large number of people support one option but some don't, this doesn't mean that that's the "outcome". It means some people are disagreeing, and those people's objections need to be addressed!
652:
to suggest it, but this is in fact your best bet at negotiating an improvement in conditions (improved behavior by candidate on RFA, or changes to a page that you feel are essential on *FD) . :-) Of course, you are not invincible, and you should beware of overplaying your hand, lest you be labeled a
330:
In the context of
Knowledge (XXG) articles, straw polls are most helpful, if ever, in evaluating whether a consensus exists or in "testing the waters" of editor opinion among a few discrete choices such as two choices for an article's name. Even in these cases, straw polls may never be understood as
140:
Knowledge (XXG) uses the words "vote" and "poll" as quick shorthand for what we are actually doing. It doesn't help that votes and polls actually look similar, so when many people first encounter a poll, they believe they are being asked to vote. This causes many misunderstandings, and is in fact not
613:
Polls on feature requests are totally ignored by the developers. They are essentially a different community, and they frankly have no time to try to figure out what precicely goes on day to day on the pages of en.Knowledge (XXG) or any of the other 700 wikis run by the
Wikimedia foundation. That and
326:
that the participants in a straw poll offer, and should see if those explanations help to develop their own opinions or suggest compromise. In this context, a few well reasoned opinions may affect a debate much more than several unexplained mere votes for a different course. It's the opinions we're
235:
Polling encourages the community to remain divided by avoiding that discourse; participants don't interact with the other voters, but merely choose camps. Establishing consensus requires expressing that opinion in terms other than a choice between discrete options, and expanding the reasoning behind
156:
Decisions are normally made by consensus: an agreement to a certain course of action by editors. Consensus is not quite the same as unanimity. Especially when working with "rough consensus" (which is necessary to get past minor issues somewhat more expeditiously), the differences are rather marked.
510:
Please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) under the position you support, and please add a (hopefully brief and well thought out) comment. If you are happy with more than one possibility, you may wish to sign your names to more than one place. Extended commentary should be placed below, in the
338:
The words "vote" and "voting" have a variety of connotations, but on
Knowledge (XXG) they are defined as ballot-casting or majority voting, especially by older Wikipedians. For that reason, the use of the words "vote" and "voting" are considered incorrect when describing Knowledge (XXG) processes.
647:
Some pages (RFA, *FD) use variants on polling, and also introduce the concept of Rough consensus. This means that instead of unanimous support or "I don't care", people make do with only say 80% support. This does not quite make these processes a vote, however (see above). and you can be caught by
311:
Once responses to a straw poll have begun, even minor changes to the phrasing of the poll are likely to result in an all out battle over whether the poll itself was fair. Consider proposing straw poll language several days prior to opening the actual poll to responses, and beginning the poll only
231:
Having the option of settling a dispute by taking a poll, instead of the careful consideration, dissection and eventual synthesis of each side's arguments, actually undermines the progress in dispute resolution that
Knowledge (XXG) has allowed. This is a strength, not a failing, and is one of the
335:
remember that the straw poll is not binding and continue discussions. Of course, this is subject to consensus. (A quick poll as per "changed mind", "haven't changed" mind, might occasionally be helpful when you're working on a negotiated consensus... to make sure you're not forgetting people!)
334:
Straw polls should not be used excessively. If a straw poll was called on an issue recently, there is usually no reason to call a second poll, even if you think that consensus may have changed or that the first poll was conducted unfairly. If you disagree with the "majority" opinion, simply
398:
have more important issues to consider than popular demand, such as server load. The developers, of course, do not function in a vacuum, so while a poll is not going to affect whether or not a feature request is implemented or not, the discussion and comments made during a poll likely
304:
For the same reason, article straw polls should not be used prematurely. If it is clear from ongoing discussion that consensus has not been reached, a straw poll is unlikely to assist in forming consensus and may polarize opinions, preventing or delaying any consensus from
300:
binding, and editors who continue to disagree with a majority opinion may not be shut out from discussions simply because they are in the minority. Similarly, editors who appear to be in the majority have an obligation to continue discussions and attempts to reach true
277:
Editors considering an article-related straw poll must remember that polling should be used with care, and should not invoke straw polls prematurely. Note that straw polling cannot serve as a substitute for debate and consensus; that no straw poll is
614:
polls can't overrule the laws of physics. Â ;-) Developers do what is possible in the real world. This doesn't mean that developers aren't willing to help though! If you have a problem or a decent idea, try approaching them directly!
215:
Poll structured discussions may not be an optimal way to handle particular topics, and people are making efforts to slowly deprecate them. Unfortunately they have become somewhat deeply ingrained, so this will take quite some time.
798:
793:
788:
436:
In general, surveys are to help gauge the degree of consensus on an issue, such as whether a particular article version appears to be POV or NPOV. Surveys should not be used for the purposes of "fact finding".
442:
Once started, the questions and wording in the survey should not change. However, if someone feels that the existing survey is seriously flawed, this is typically an indication Step 2 was not completed
232:
most important things that make
Knowledge (XXG) special, and while taking a poll is very often a lot easier than helping each other find a mutually agreeable position, it's almost never better.
803:
339:
Surveying and commenting are words closer to what we do on
Knowledge (XXG) in the English language. The actual shorthand for straw poll serveying used on Knowledge (XXG) is simply "Polling".
730:
725:
668:
641:
AFD et al. are not infrequently decided in favor of a minority with better and policy/guideline based arguments. (because logically worded arguments will advance consensus further. )
285:
Straw polls regarding article content are often inconclusive and sometimes highly contentious. In order to have a chance of being productive, editors must appreciate the following:
248:
28:
352:
rely upon polling and help streamline the functioning of the project. In general issues are almost never resolved with a poll, merely where individuals stand on the issues is
236:
it, addressing the points that others have left, until all come to a mutually agreeable solution. No one can address objections that aren't stated, points that aren't made.
446:
If the majority of opinion is in one direction, but a significant minority of people oppose it, work to find a solution that can be accepted by as many people as possible.
402:
Editor conduct used to be subject to polling in the past, via a system called
Quickpolls, but this has been deprecated years ago because it generated more heat than light.
767:
308:
Similarly, if a straw poll is inconclusive, or if there is disagreement about whether the question itself was unfair, the poll and its results should simply be ignored.
262:
of opinions on some issue, as an aid to achieving consensus and an indication of which options have the most support. Surveys should never be thought of as binding.
182:
In the same way that a ruler does not change the length of your finger or make a new finger (it merely measures it), a poll does not change or make consensus.
715:
152:
a democracy nor a system of government, however, so we do not use voting as a process on en.Knowledge (XXG) itself, although there are very rare experiments.
710:
385:
483:
If you are posting on talk pages, asking experienced editors to give their opinion on an issue, make sure not to use language that may suggest bias.
630:
It is fair game to try to change a persons' opinion on a poll (but there are certain standards of politeness and decorum... can we describe them?)
850:
624:
As anywhere else, your opinion on a poll may be challenged. Be prepared to explain your opinion further, and be prepared to explain your logic.
840:
384:
Guidelines are never created through polling on them, only consensus about aspects of guidelines are gauged. Gauging whether policy should be
772:
66:
266:
99:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
100:
51:
251:
it can be a tool for probing opinions especially outside of article content discussions, so that one knows who to talk with to obtain a
405:
Admins, Bureaucrats and
Arbiters are, in most but not all cases, given corresponding tools after a poll to gauge community approval.
740:
34:
587:
Discussion resulting from the survey would go here. If there were a significant amount, it might be moved to a talk page instead.
506:
Note that this is purely a sample of one way to organise such a survey—different circumstances may call for different approaches.
678:
470:
make it difficult to observe on watchlists. Consider using unique headers, such as parenthetical headers used in the massive
638:
Retroactively making a poll binding (e.g. "it's not binding but we'll do what the majority wants") is a hazard to be avoided
627:
If you think someone is holding an illogical view, feel free to engage them in good faith, and let them explain their views.
61:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
360:
Content issues are almost never subject to polling. Out of our 1.7 million articles, fewer than 0.1% were ever polled upon.
391:
Novice users sometimes think they should make a "motion" and "call for votes", but
Knowledge (XXG) doesn't work like that.
720:
62:
414:
These guidelines provide a framework that may be followed when creating a new survey. These are not binding in any way.
174:
is a survey (a measuring tool) which determines the current state of a situation, with respect to consensus. It doesn't
845:
745:
750:
188:
Polls are typically used in somewhat more complex situations, where it might be hard to otherwise get an overview:
673:
367:
192:
Early or in the middle of a discussion, to determine where people stand, and who needs to negotiate with whom.
556:
780:
735:
663:
290:
252:
104:
58:
533:
518:
148:, by "voting" we mean a process by which people reach decisions in a majority based democratic system.
598:
This is a sort of semi-sandbox, where points that are yet to be integrated in the main text can be kept
523:
211:
When we would like to make fairly simple decisions at a centralised location in a short amount of time.
114:
572:
538:
567:
315:
Essentially, article content is not subject to straw polling. People have been known to "vote" on a
219:
Especially based on current insights on simplification and scaling, we don't recommend designing any
683:
490:"Hey, Bob, could you tell me what you think about this discussion? I think your input could help."
322:
The purpose of a straw poll is to stimulate discussion and consensus. Editors should evaluate the
282:
on editors who do not agree; and that polling may aggravate rather than resolve existing disputes.
166:. Rarely, but often enough to be noticeable, negotiators might use polls as part of their toolkit.
92:
799:
Knowledge (XXG):Times that 200 Wikipedians voted support for something, generally RFA and ArbCom.
794:
Knowledge (XXG):Times that 300 Wikipedians voted support for something, generally RFA and Arbcom.
545:
259:
649:
433:
be reached about the nature of the survey before it starts. Allow about a week for this process.
239:
Yes, establishing consensus is a lot harder than taking a poll. So are most things worth doing.
633:
439:
A deadline for the survey should be considered so as to resolve the issue in a timely manner.
374:
17:
471:
395:
378:
349:
279:
149:
418:
Any Wikipedian may start a survey on any topic, but attempts to reach consensus are much,
603:
Polls on article content should generally be avoided. They can lead to (accusations of)
705:
A survey of previous notable (on the project) polls related to Knowledge (XXG) policies
692:
688:
834:
293:, and a straw poll is helpful only if it helps editors actually reach true consensus.
107:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
551:
199:, but we want to make sure we haven't accidentally missed any important opinions.
331:
creating a consensus, but merely as one tool to measure where consensus stands.
457:
sections in a survey make navigation difficult, and edit summaries which read
759:
618:
604:
185:
What a poll can do is give you insight into where people stand on an issue.
511:
section marked "Discussion", though brief commentary can be interspersed.
789:
Knowledge (XXG):Times that 400 Wikipedians voted support for something.
373:, but in most cases they are resolved through other processes, such as
426:
preferred, and should perhaps be followed even when it pains us most.
394:
Feature requests are not subject to polling, simply because the
203:
At one point in time, certain processes were also set up to use
804:
Knowledge (XXG):Times that 100 Wikipedians supported something.
78:
38:
312:
once you have consensus on the precise question to be asked.
669:
Knowledge (XXG):Polling is not a substitute for discussion
344:
Certain polling is frequent, other polling not so frequent
29:
Knowledge (XXG):Polling is not a substitute for discussion
644:
RFA/ArbElect are subject to interpretation by the closer
822:
779:
A survey of polls that larger than typical numbers of
122:
768:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for rollback privileges/Poll
223:
poll structured discussions at this moment in time.
758:A survey of polls related to feature requests on
610:Polls on policy proposals are likewise a bad idea
496:"Yet another attempt to push POV-- please help!"
289:The ultimate goal of any article discussion is
563:Allow both as equally acceptable alternatives
541:-- but redirect from BCE and CE (first choice)
823:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed wheel warring policy
249:straw poll is not a substitute for discussion
8:
544:This is always how we did it in school. --
363:Deletion issues can be subject to polls on
741:Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy pages#Poll
296:For that reason, article straw polls are
101:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
815:
348:A number of formal processes, such as
160:Consensus is normally reached through
7:
35:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
726:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
731:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration policy
679:Knowledge (XXG):Voting is not evil
634:Knowledge (XXG) is not a democracy
617:Polls are non-binding. (see under
267:Knowledge (XXG) is not a democracy
197:consensus has already been reached
105:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
851:Knowledge (XXG) surveys and polls
711:Knowledge (XXG):Three-revert rule
593:Points that need to be integrated
550:Why go against the (main)stream?
327:looking for, not a show of hands.
178:consensus. It merely measures it.
841:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals
716:Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all rules
319:, which is ultimately pointless.
258:Sometimes it's useful to take a
207:. We still use these processes:
82:
76:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
42:
773:Knowledge (XXG):Blocking policy
136:Definitions: polling and voting
751:Knowledge (XXG):Adminship poll
1:
674:Knowledge (XXG):Supermajority
227:Polling discourages consensus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Voting policy
273:Straw poll survey guidelines
721:Knowledge (XXG):Attribution
388:happens but not frequently.
205:poll structured discussions
867:
746:Knowledge (XXG):Quickpolls
112:
32:
26:
736:Knowledge (XXG):Wheel war
664:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus
515:Use BCE and CE for years
472:Admin accountability poll
530:Use AD and BC for years
65:or initiate a thread at
695:(courtesy MeatballWiki)
621:- no binding decisions)
846:Knowledge (XXG) essays
467:- this option is best)
150:Knowledge (XXG) is not
103:, as it has not been
253:negotiated consensus
566:It's the wiki way!
700:Straw poll surveys
557:Control-alt-delete
599:
468:
410:Creating a survey
133:
132:
74:
73:
16:(Redirected from
858:
825:
820:
783:participated in.
597:
479:Survey etiquette
466:
463:
459:
372:
368:Deletion debates
366:
125:
86:
85:
79:
67:the village pump
46:
45:
39:
21:
866:
865:
861:
860:
859:
857:
856:
855:
831:
830:
829:
828:
821:
817:
812:
702:
660:
595:
584:
575:(second choice)
503:
481:
464:
461:
412:
370:
364:
346:
275:
245:
229:
138:
129:
128:
121:
117:
109:
108:
83:
77:
70:
43:
37:
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
864:
862:
854:
853:
848:
843:
833:
832:
827:
826:
814:
813:
811:
808:
807:
806:
801:
796:
791:
785:
784:
776:
775:
770:
764:
763:
755:
754:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
707:
706:
701:
698:
697:
696:
693:Voting is evil
689:Voting is good
686:
681:
676:
671:
666:
659:
656:
655:
654:
645:
642:
639:
636:
631:
628:
625:
622:
615:
611:
608:
594:
591:
590:
583:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
570:
561:
560:
559:
554:
548:
542:
536:
528:
527:
526:
521:
502:
499:
498:
497:
491:
480:
477:
476:
475:
469:
458:
447:
444:
440:
437:
434:
427:
411:
408:
407:
406:
403:
400:
392:
389:
382:
361:
345:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
320:
313:
309:
306:
302:
294:
274:
271:
265:Be aware that
244:
241:
228:
225:
213:
212:
201:
200:
195:When we think
193:
180:
179:
154:
153:
137:
134:
131:
130:
127:
126:
118:
113:
110:
98:
97:
89:
87:
75:
72:
71:
57:
56:
47:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
863:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
838:
836:
824:
819:
816:
809:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
786:
782:
778:
777:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
762:functionality
761:
757:
756:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
708:
704:
703:
699:
694:
690:
687:
685:
684:Template:Poll
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
665:
662:
661:
657:
651:
646:
643:
640:
637:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
616:
612:
609:
606:
602:
601:
600:
592:
589:
588:
581:
574:
571:
569:
565:
564:
562:
558:
555:
553:
549:
547:
543:
540:
537:
535:
534:FictionalName
532:
531:
529:
525:
522:
520:
519:Alice Springs
517:
516:
514:
513:
512:
508:
507:
501:Sample survey
500:
495:
492:
489:
486:
485:
484:
478:
473:
456:
452:
448:
445:
441:
438:
435:
432:
428:
425:
421:
417:
416:
415:
409:
404:
401:
397:
393:
390:
387:
383:
380:
376:
369:
362:
359:
358:
357:
355:
351:
343:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
314:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
288:
287:
286:
283:
281:
272:
270:
268:
263:
261:
256:
254:
250:
242:
240:
237:
233:
226:
224:
222:
217:
210:
209:
208:
206:
198:
194:
191:
190:
189:
186:
183:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
165:
164:
158:
151:
147:
144:
143:
142:
135:
124:
120:
119:
116:
111:
106:
102:
96:
94:
88:
81:
80:
68:
64:
63:the talk page
60:
55:
53:
48:
41:
40:
36:
30:
19:
818:
596:
586:
585:
552:user:Zanimum
524:EfferVescent
509:
505:
504:
493:
487:
482:
454:
450:
430:
423:
419:
413:
353:
347:
324:explanations
323:
316:
297:
284:
276:
264:
257:
246:
238:
234:
230:
220:
218:
214:
204:
202:
196:
187:
184:
181:
175:
171:
162:
161:
159:
155:
145:
139:
90:
49:
781:Wikipedians
573:Fred Bloggs
539:Fred Bloggs
163:negotiation
91:This is an
835:Categories
810:References
753:- a series
582:Discussion
568:OnTheFence
429:Consensus
396:developers
301:consensus.
243:Definition
141:the case.
50:This is a
33:See also:
27:See also:
760:MediaWiki
619:Consensus
605:wikiality
449:Multiple
443:properly.
354:clarified
291:consensus
59:Consensus
54:proposal.
658:See also
650:WP:BEANS
305:forming.
247:While a
123:WP:STRAW
115:Shortcut
465:Support
451:Support
386:enacted
375:WP:PROD
280:binding
653:troll!
546:MadeUp
455:Oppose
379:WP:CSD
350:WP:AFD
260:survey
52:failed
488:Good:
399:will.
298:never
93:essay
494:Bad:
431:must
424:MUCH
420:much
377:and
317:fact
176:form
172:poll
146:Vote
453:or
221:new
837::
691:,
422:,
371:}}
365:{{
356:.
170:A
607:.
474:.
462:→
460:(
381:.
95:.
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.