1121:, which has mostly been covering STS-related topics for a while. While many STS scholars and articles fall within the scope of that project, there are many scholars who are not historians, and might be better served by a project which focuses on STS topics. It would probably be best if the potential WikiProject STS and the established WikiProject HoS were considered sister projects, with HoS being the elder sister with experience and expertise.
1064:
1039:
90:) is an interdisciplinary academic field of social sciences and the humanities that studies science, technology, and the social systems that surround them from historical, anthropological, sociological, and philosophical perspectives (among other approaches). It's been an established field for several years with multiple university departments, scholars, academic societies, and journals.
1440:
and the various science wikiprojects failing? We don't need a wikiproject devoted to every synchretic thing someone somewhere teaches a class in. There are innumerable intersections of various fields, and we still cover them under broader-topic wikiprojects that pool sufficient editors to (we hope)
1135:
though it's unclear what exactly our relationship to them would be. Generally, STS scholars could help provide contextual sections on existing
Science and Technology articles, though that is already mostly covered within the scope of those projects. Where we could really be helpful is by providing
1536:
I do not agree with STS falling under sociology at all. The reason is that STS is precisely not a disciplinary subfield but a highly interdisciplinary field, as much drawing on and enricjhing sociology, cultural anthropology as philosophy and history (to name a few). STS is better understood as a
102:. Many of the core articles are currently under-developed and have multiple issues, including a lack of inline citations and reliance on "further reading" sections. A selection of articles on the project that exist right now would be:
1564:: I'm generally supportive of this initiative, especially if there is critical mass of interest to launch and sustain it. Perhaps a good place to start and demonstrate that interest is with a dedicated effort to improve the
1304:
1489:
Science and technology studies is not the intersection of science and technology, nor is it a syncretic thing. STS is a branch of social science: the existing WikiProject it best fits under is
1511:
I'll buy that, though it should also probably be listed as a "child" of some other projects like tech and science and history of science. Anyway, if even the broader and more well-established
266:
1295:
1106:
1072:
1082:
1077:
178:
1168:
234:
It'd be great to create an STS infobox, or at least a "part of a series on ..." box. STS's presence on
Knowledge (XXG) would also benefit from an STS portal.
259:
1159:
1118:
1149:
21:
1312:
399:
1270:
1665:
1569:
1102:
1067:
252:
1538:
1236:
1202:
760:
474:
1437:
1261:
1132:
1024:
1490:
1227:
1526:
1456:
469:
462:
445:
324:
314:
296:
152:
116:
696:
1647:
1591:: Given the general lack of interest, I'm thinking that it might make more sense to organize this as a taskforce instead, under
1442:
1193:
1176:
1128:
44:
17:
1565:
805:
81:
1646:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the
275:
111:
99:
98:
WikiProject STS currently would seem to have a scope of over 1,000 articles, given the number of articles which link to the
43:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the
992:
822:
750:
450:
379:
1278:
56:. Ok conversation seems to have died out here. There was some interest in starting a project, then a task force under
1515:
field doesn't have a separate project (subsumed under the history of science project), this doesn't need one either.
1244:
800:
1210:
1386:
1050:
1007:
1002:
977:
892:
882:
877:
437:
1546:
1417:
887:
790:
384:
907:
735:
686:
57:
1595:
probably (as they're currently the closest project), potentially jointly under other projects (especially
1577:
917:
902:
862:
634:
457:
1596:
1523:
1512:
1453:
1014:
982:
957:
842:
795:
691:
669:
659:
644:
584:
571:
544:
409:
374:
331:
122:
1629:
1605:
1581:
1550:
1531:
1506:
1484:
1475:
Check out the updates I've made to the page since opening it and tell me if this is still your opinion
1466:
1421:
1407:
1390:
1376:
1362:
1348:
69:
1502:
1480:
1382:
1358:
1344:
929:
872:
775:
755:
713:
629:
624:
599:
524:
291:
157:
137:
1592:
1542:
1413:
922:
912:
770:
740:
664:
649:
609:
604:
529:
414:
132:
1148:
Please invite these and any other similar groups to join the discussion about this proposal. See
1038:
1568:, which needs quite a bit of work, in my opinion. I'm not sure there's a need to "take over" the
967:
837:
639:
539:
534:
319:
65:
1136:
additional information and analysis of particular sciences and technologies from STS scholars.
1622:
1573:
1572:; if there are suggestions for improving it, please post on that article's talk page. Thanks,
1400:
1055:
1019:
654:
589:
559:
1614:
1141:
1518:
1448:
1372:
972:
947:
847:
708:
703:
484:
162:
1601:
1498:
1494:
1476:
1354:
1340:
987:
832:
810:
579:
494:
479:
190:
127:
1441:
actually get anything done. This sounds like a joint taskforce/workgroup of WP:TECH and
1123:
Ideally, the proposed project could attract new editors to HoS and help with HoS's goals.
1045:
997:
952:
745:
681:
594:
554:
394:
354:
210:
1659:
857:
827:
765:
566:
514:
509:
419:
195:
61:
1619:
1613:
I've been interested in forming a tech ethics task force myself; it would be under
1397:
817:
676:
614:
349:
220:
215:
205:
200:
185:
119:- a related field, sometimes considered distinct and sometimes coincident with STS.
244:
1368:
852:
549:
519:
504:
369:
364:
60:, but momentum seems to have waned. Feel free to re-open this proposal anytime.
785:
780:
725:
389:
359:
341:
962:
429:
404:
283:
37:
The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below.
1617:
instead, though. I think these ideas are similar enough to be one group.
306:
939:
1640:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
248:
1335:
Also, specify whether or not you would join the project.
1320:
1316:
1308:
1300:
1286:
1282:
1274:
1266:
1252:
1248:
1240:
1232:
1218:
1214:
1206:
1198:
1184:
1180:
1172:
1164:
1296:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject HumanâComputer
Interaction
1107:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Science, technology and society
938:
724:
493:
428:
340:
305:
282:
242:We'd also take over the editing of our template:
47:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1650:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1497:has alerted that WikiProject to this proposal.)
179:Category:Science_and_technology_studies_scholars
1436:: Seems excessively specific. In what way are
1160:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science
1150:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Council/Directory
260:
8:
1117:The proposed project would be distinct from
267:
253:
245:
1103:Category:Science and technology studies
1262:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
1140:List of WikiProjects currently on the
1133:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
1491:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology
1228:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology
7:
1194:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science
1129:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science
761:Digital media use and mental health
475:Sociology of the history of science
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council
1101:Further articles can be viewed at
28:
1113:Relation to Existing WikiProjects
470:Sociology of scientific ignorance
315:History and philosophy of science
297:Economics of scientific knowledge
153:Social construction of technology
117:History and Philosophy of Science
1063:
1062:
1037:
94:Scope and important/sample pages
88:Science, Technology, and Society
1666:Archived WikiProject proposals
1119:WikiProject History of Science
276:Science and technology studies
112:Science and Technology Studies
82:Science and Technology Studies
1:
1582:11:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
1532:04:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
1516:
1507:14:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
1485:03:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
1467:03:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
1446:
1363:10:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
1349:03:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
1152:to find similar WikiProjects.
52:The proposed WikiProject was
1537:'studies' field, similar to
1391:18:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
823:Normalization process theory
380:Philosophy of social science
70:20:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
1599:. What do folks think? - -
1682:
1551:14:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
1422:14:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
1377:22:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
446:construction of technology
1630:06:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
1438:WP:WikiProject Technology
1408:06:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
1127:We'd also be relevant to
1105:(currently 77 pages) and
1033:
978:Politicization of science
1643:Please do not modify it.
385:Philosophy of technology
40:Please do not modify it.
1606:19:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
1443:WP:WikiProject Science
458:Sociology of knowledge
1513:philosophy of science
1367:Would probably join.
1025:Transition management
1015:Technology assessment
983:Regulation of science
958:Evidence-based policy
843:Sociotechnical system
692:Traditional knowledge
572:Psychology of science
545:Mapping controversies
451:shaping of technology
410:Social constructivism
375:Philosophy of science
332:History of technology
230:Info Box & Portal
123:History of technology
930:Women in engineering
776:Financial technology
756:Digital anthropology
525:Criticism of science
438:Actorânetwork theory
400:Religion and science
292:Economics of science
158:Actor-network theory
138:Economics of science
1648:WikiProject Council
771:Engineering studies
741:Cyborg anthropology
530:Demarcation problem
415:Social epistemology
133:Engineering studies
45:WikiProject Council
1611:Support task force
1051:History of science
968:Funding of science
838:Skunkworks project
535:Double hermeneutic
320:History of science
1336:
1153:
1144:of those articles
1093:
1092:
1020:Technology policy
751:Dematerialization
560:black swan events
106:Fields of inquiry
31:
1673:
1645:
1628:
1530:
1465:
1406:
1334:
1325:
1324:
1291:
1290:
1257:
1256:
1223:
1222:
1189:
1188:
1147:
1066:
1065:
1041:
993:Right to science
973:Horizon scanning
948:Academic freedom
848:Technical change
709:Women in science
704:Unity of science
485:Strong programme
269:
262:
255:
246:
163:Strong Programme
42:
30:
1681:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1641:
1627:
1618:
1463:
1430:
1405:
1396:
1383:DiasporaCryptid
1332:
1298:
1294:
1264:
1260:
1230:
1226:
1196:
1192:
1162:
1158:
1115:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1029:
988:Research ethics
934:
833:Reverse salient
720:
489:
480:Sociotechnology
424:
336:
301:
278:
273:
240:
232:
191:Sheila Jasanoff
177:Main Category:
174:
149:
147:Concepts/Theory
128:Science Studies
108:
96:
78:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1679:
1677:
1669:
1668:
1658:
1657:
1653:
1652:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1625:
1585:
1584:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1543:Ingmar.lippert
1539:Gender Studies
1534:
1487:
1470:
1469:
1461:
1429:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1414:Ingmar.lippert
1410:
1403:
1393:
1379:
1365:
1351:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1292:
1258:
1224:
1190:
1155:
1154:
1145:
1114:
1111:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1028:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1005:
998:Science policy
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
953:Digital divide
950:
944:
942:
936:
935:
933:
932:
927:
926:
925:
920:
915:
910:
905:
897:
896:
895:
890:
885:
880:
875:
869:Technological
867:
866:
865:
855:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
814:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
746:Design studies
743:
738:
732:
730:
727:
722:
721:
719:
718:
717:
716:
706:
701:
700:
699:
689:
684:
682:Scientometrics
679:
674:
673:
672:
667:
662:
657:
652:
647:
642:
637:
632:
627:
619:
618:
617:
612:
607:
602:
597:
592:
587:
582:
574:
569:
564:
563:
562:
555:Paradigm shift
552:
547:
542:
537:
532:
527:
522:
517:
512:
507:
501:
499:
496:
491:
490:
488:
487:
482:
477:
472:
467:
466:
465:
455:
454:
453:
448:
440:
434:
432:
426:
425:
423:
422:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
395:Postpositivism
392:
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
362:
357:
355:Antipositivism
352:
346:
344:
338:
337:
335:
334:
329:
328:
327:
325:and technology
317:
311:
309:
303:
302:
300:
299:
294:
288:
286:
280:
279:
274:
272:
271:
264:
257:
249:
239:
236:
231:
228:
227:
226:
223:
218:
213:
211:Langdon Winner
208:
203:
198:
193:
188:
173:
170:
169:
168:
165:
160:
155:
148:
145:
144:
143:
140:
135:
130:
125:
120:
114:
107:
104:
95:
92:
77:
74:
73:
50:
49:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1678:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1661:
1651:
1649:
1644:
1638:
1637:
1631:
1624:
1621:
1616:
1612:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1603:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:DA Sonnenfeld
1571:
1567:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1535:
1533:
1528:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1468:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1444:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1412:Would join --
1411:
1409:
1402:
1399:
1394:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1381:Would join --
1380:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1353:(would join)
1352:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1329:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1263:
1259:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1195:
1191:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1112:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1097:More articles
1096:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
1000:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
945:
943:
941:
937:
931:
928:
924:
921:
919:
916:
914:
911:
909:
906:
904:
901:
900:
898:
894:
891:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
870:
868:
864:
861:
860:
859:
858:Technoscience
856:
854:
851:
849:
846:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
828:Media studies
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
788:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
766:Early adopter
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
736:Co-production
734:
733:
731:
729:
723:
715:
712:
711:
710:
707:
705:
702:
698:
695:
694:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
626:
623:
622:
620:
616:
613:
611:
608:
606:
603:
601:
598:
596:
593:
591:
588:
586:
585:communication
583:
581:
578:
577:
575:
573:
570:
568:
567:Pseudoscience
565:
561:
558:
557:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
515:Boundary-work
513:
511:
510:Bibliometrics
508:
506:
503:
502:
500:
498:
492:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
464:
461:
460:
459:
456:
452:
449:
447:
444:
443:
441:
439:
436:
435:
433:
431:
427:
421:
420:Transhumanism
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
347:
345:
343:
339:
333:
330:
326:
323:
322:
321:
318:
316:
313:
312:
310:
308:
304:
298:
295:
293:
290:
289:
287:
285:
281:
277:
270:
265:
263:
258:
256:
251:
250:
247:
243:
237:
235:
229:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
196:Donna Haraway
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
171:
166:
164:
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
150:
146:
141:
139:
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
124:
121:
118:
115:
113:
110:
109:
105:
103:
101:
93:
91:
89:
86:(Also called
85:
83:
75:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
58:WP:TECHNOLOGY
55:
48:
46:
41:
35:
34:
32:
23:
19:
1642:
1639:
1610:
1600:
1597:WP:Sociology
1588:
1561:
1519:
1449:
1433:
1333:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1100:
1073:Associations
908:criticism of
818:Leapfrogging
801:linear model
687:Team science
677:Scientocracy
600:Neo-colonial
350:Anthropocene
241:
238:STS template
233:
221:Helen Verran
216:Lucy Suchman
206:Steve Fuller
201:Trevor Pinch
186:Bruno Latour
176:
175:
172:Key Scholars
97:
87:
80:
79:
53:
51:
39:
36:
29:
1520:SMcCandlish
1450:SMcCandlish
1395:Would join
918:theories of
903:and society
899:Technology
893:transitions
883:determinism
878:convergence
853:Technocracy
635:controversy
621:Scientific
605:post-normal
550:Metascience
520:Consilience
505:Antiscience
370:Neo-Luddism
365:Fuzzy logic
76:Description
54:not created
1602:mathmitch7
1593:WP:HISTSCI
1570:STS navbox
1499:Bondegezou
1495:Mathmitch7
1477:Mathmitch7
1428:Discussion
1355:Bondegezou
1341:Mathmitch7
1142:talk pages
1056:Technology
1008:science of
1003:history of
888:revolution
796:disruptive
786:Innovation
781:Hype cycle
726:Technology
697:ecological
670:skepticism
660:misconduct
645:enterprise
463:scientific
390:Positivism
360:Empiricism
342:Philosophy
1566:main page
963:Factor 10
791:diffusion
630:consensus
625:community
590:education
430:Sociology
405:Scientism
284:Economics
100:main page
22:Proposals
1660:Category
1083:Scholars
1078:Journals
1068:Category
1042:Portals
923:transfer
913:dynamics
863:feminist
665:priority
650:literacy
610:rhetoric
576:Science
540:Logology
62:Ajpolino
20: |
1620:Qzekrom
1615:WP:TECH
1589:Comment
1562:Comment
1434:Comment
1398:Qzekrom
1330:Support
1309:history
1275:history
1241:history
1207:history
1173:history
1046:Science
728:studies
640:dissent
580:citizen
497:studies
495:Science
442:Social
307:History
225:&c.
167:&c.
142:&c.
1464:⹡<
1369:Zazpot
940:Policy
873:change
806:system
655:method
595:normal
1459:: -->
1317:watch
1313:links
1283:watch
1279:links
1249:watch
1245:links
1215:watch
1211:links
1181:watch
1177:links
84:(STS)
16:<
1626:them
1578:talk
1547:talk
1503:talk
1481:talk
1418:talk
1404:them
1387:talk
1373:talk
1359:talk
1345:talk
1321:logs
1305:talk
1301:edit
1287:logs
1271:talk
1267:edit
1253:logs
1237:talk
1233:edit
1219:logs
1203:talk
1199:edit
1185:logs
1169:talk
1165:edit
1131:and
811:user
714:STEM
615:wars
66:talk
1529:đź
1493:. (
1662::
1623:đŹ
1580:)
1549:)
1541:.
1517:â
1505:)
1483:)
1460:⹡Ň
1447:â
1445:.
1420:)
1401:đŹ
1389:)
1375:)
1361:)
1347:)
1319:|
1315:|
1311:|
1307:|
1303:|
1285:|
1281:|
1277:|
1273:|
1269:|
1251:|
1247:|
1243:|
1239:|
1235:|
1217:|
1213:|
1209:|
1205:|
1201:|
1183:|
1179:|
1175:|
1171:|
1167:|
1109:.
68:)
1576:(
1545:(
1527:¢
1524:â
1501:(
1479:(
1462:á´Ľ
1457:¢
1454:â
1416:(
1385:(
1371:(
1357:(
1343:(
1323:)
1299:(
1289:)
1265:(
1255:)
1231:(
1221:)
1197:(
1187:)
1163:(
268:e
261:t
254:v
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.