Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion (Australia) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

167:
El Alamein, and undertook garrison duties in Syria and Lebanon, in the early part of the war. Later, they took part in the fighting against the Japanese in New Guinea, participating in campaigns to capture Lae, the Huon Peninsula and Borneo. This is the second machine gun battalion article I have brought to ACR and I hope to eventually do the same with the other two, although I will continue to hint to Peacemaker that he might like to work on the 2/3rd MG...; - ) Thank you to all who stop by to help review and improve the article. Regards,
275:
they were used largely as tractors... The New Guinea campaign demonstrated that the rate of advance in tropical warfare was governed by the speed with which the Engineers could make the jeep tracks. With sufficient jeeps, an adequate supply of ammunition for the Vickers could be maintained at the jeephead, always close up behind the leading infantry.
200:"which was drawn to a close quicker than expected by the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagaskai in early August 1945" - not sure about this: the 9th Division had reached all its goals around Brunei Bay and Tarakan by July, and didn't intend to pursue the Japanese into the interior of Borneo. 299:
IRT to misuse a quick skim of Oakes didn't reveal the issue being mentioned in such terms; however, it certainly mentions the battalion being used in secondary roles such as unloading ships, carrying supplies, local defence, also as infantry etc. The best ref for this is probably page 191-92 which is
274:
At Red Beach the vehicle strength had shrunk to two 6x6 GMC five-tonners and six jeeps. Each machine gun company got a jeep, with the other two retained at Battalion HQ and HQ Company. With no roads, and water transport being used to move stores, the five-tonners were left behind on Red Beach, where
267:
The Battalion history (Oakes) has a bit IRT to transport, from p. 229: The Tropical War Establish was approved in October 1944 which officially confirmed that the battalion would no longer be motorized, however, was an improvement on New Guinea, providing 19 jeeps and trailers for the battalion (as
166:
The 2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion was one of four similar units raised as part of the Second Australian Imperial Force for overseas service during the Second World War. Recruited mainly from Queenslanders and New South Welshmen, the 2/2nd were attached to the 9th Division and fought in the Battles of
196:
It seems that the 9th Division didn't really know what to do with the 2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion during its campaigns in 1943, with it's personnel frequently being mis-used as labourers or ad-hoc infantry reserves. Do any sources state this explicitly and/or explain why? (from memory, Palazzo has
221:
Thanks, Nick, I've made a few adjustments based on your comments. Please let me know if anything else needs work. I wasn't able to load Palazzo's Organising for Jungle Warfare, unfortunately, as my computer seems to be on its way out... I used to have a saved copy, but I lost that when the other
282:
provided for a jeep and trailer at Battalion HQ, two with HQ Company, and four jeeps and trailers with each machine gun company, one to be at Company HQ. The 8-cwt water trailers were discarded, the water supply being provided by two-gallon containers on an ordinary
357:
The really short paragraph that mentions Eric Lambert is wedged b/n two larger paragraphs which to me at least is visually grating (yes I probably have OCD). Perhaps you might tack it on to the end of the para
70: 353:
File:Members of B Company of the 2-2 Machine Gun Battalion moving along a road towards Brunei AWM 109273.jpg - lacks Alt text, given all the others have it you might consider adding it to this image too for
460:"...the battalion was assigned to the 2nd AIF's second division – the 7th – and...": maybe add a note regarding the numbering of the Aussie divisions? The 1st to 5th were the militia divisions right? 120: 116: 108: 21: 190:
How did the move to the tropical/jungle organisation affect the battalion? (in particular, how did it move the heavy machine guns around after losing much of its transport?)
146: 533: 515: 490: 433: 418: 390: 376: 335:
Having reviewed at GA and checked over the changes now made as part of the A class review I'm of the opinion this meets the criteria for promotion so I've added my
330: 309: 294: 251: 231: 209: 176: 66: 112: 300:
already used in the article. The information now added in the last paragraph from Fraser and Hocking though now looks like it probably covers this though.
364:
Slightly repetitive prose here: "...largely being carried across the battlefield by soldiers moving on foot; however, it was largely..." (largely x 2).
457:
Militia is linked but not on first mention (I initially thought it wasn't linked at all and was going to suggest this be done until I found the link).
151: 279:
But with only one jeep per company available, it proved difficult to keep up supplies to all platoons... The new establishment announced that October
17: 197:
written that the 1943 tropical organisation didn't have enough transport, which might have been the problem, especially in the very rugged terrain)
103: 79: 470:"...individual Australian brigades during First Battle of El Alamein as the Allied forces – who had, since the beginning of the year...": during 270:
Now the only difference between the machine gunners and the infantry was that the mug gunners had to walk just as far, but carry heavier loads!
343: 242:
My comments are now addressed. The machine gun battalions certainly look like good units to have avoided being part of in the Pacific!
193:
The lengthy sentence starting with "After a month of garrison duties and work parties" should be split into two or more sentences
361:
There is one instance of "machine-gunners", which seems inconsistent with your usage of "machine gun" with no hyphen throughout.
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
272:". The narrative bounces around a little but on page 230 he elaborates on the previous situation in New Guinea, writing: " 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
413:
and skimmed the rest, and I don't think prose issues will be a problem at WP:FAC, if you want to take it there. - Dank (
511: 429: 386: 326: 227: 172: 93: 342:
No dabs, external links check out, no duplicate links, Earwig tool reveals no issues with close paraphrase etc
449:
Reviewing this, I identified very few quibbles. The article is in excellent shape, as per your normal work
372: 305: 290: 507: 450: 425: 382: 322: 223: 168: 89: 62: 54: 368: 316: 301: 286: 247: 205: 529: 486: 58: 414: 50: 222:
computer died and now this one looks like it will go the same way. D'oh. Regards,
503:
Thanks for stopping by. I think I've got all of these now. These are my changes:
463:"This came to an end in late June 1942 when until the 9th was rushed...": delete 243: 216: 201: 525: 498: 482: 186:
This article is in very good shape, and I only have some minor comments:
350:
all images seem to be PD and have the required templates / information.
321:
Thanks for that, AC, I've added a bit more on the vehicles. Cheers,
285:" AR - hopefully this is useful, pls let me know if you need more. 268:
opposed to just six during the previous campaign in New Guinea). "
339:
now. A couple of very minor suggestions / nitpicks though:
409:: As always, feel free to revert. I've copyedited down to 156: 504: 128: 124: 453:, so the only comments I would have to make are: 381:Thanks, I've made those changes now. Regards, 474:First..., and shouldn't the "who" be "which"? 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 524:Looks good, adding my support now. Cheers. 135: 138: 104:2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion (Australia) 80:2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion (Australia) 7: 33:The following discussion is closed. 28: 544:The discussion above is closed. 506:. Thanks for your time. Regards, 367:Otherwise it looks fine to me. 72:« Return to A-Class review list 1: 434:09:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC) 419:03:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC) 391:08:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC) 377:23:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 331:04:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 310:03:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 295:03:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 252:06:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 232:04:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 210:23:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 177:20:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 565: 534:03:03, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 516:01:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 491:21:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC) 411:Service in the Middle East 67:13:06, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 277:" Continuing on p. 231: " 546:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 477:Publisher for Hocking? 424:Thanks, Dan. Regards, 481:That is it for me. 164: 163: 98: 75: 556: 508:AustralianRupert 502: 426:AustralianRupert 383:AustralianRupert 323:AustralianRupert 320: 224:AustralianRupert 220: 169:AustralianRupert 136: 133: 132: 90:AustralianRupert 86: 69: 38: 564: 563: 559: 558: 557: 555: 554: 553: 552: 496: 314: 214: 106: 102: 83: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 562: 560: 551: 550: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 519: 518: 479: 478: 475: 468: 461: 458: 437: 436: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 365: 362: 359: 355: 351: 345: 297: 237: 236: 235: 234: 198: 194: 191: 162: 161: 160: 159: 157:External links 154: 149: 141: 140: 100: 99: 88:Nominator(s): 82: 77: 43: 42: 41: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 561: 549: 547: 542: 541: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 521: 520: 517: 513: 509: 505: 500: 495: 494: 493: 492: 488: 484: 476: 473: 469: 466: 462: 459: 456: 455: 454: 452: 447: 446: 445: 441: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 408: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 366: 363: 360: 356: 352: 349: 348:Image review: 346: 344: 341: 340: 338: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 318: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 298: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 266: 265: 264: 261: 260: 256: 255: 254: 253: 249: 245: 241: 233: 229: 225: 218: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 189: 188: 187: 185: 184: 179: 178: 174: 170: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 144: 143: 142: 137: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 97: 95: 91: 85: 84: 81: 78: 76: 74: 73: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 40: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 545: 543: 480: 471: 464: 448: 443: 442: 439: 438: 415:push to talk 410: 406: 405: 369:Anotherclown 354:consistency. 347: 336: 317:Anotherclown 302:Anotherclown 287:Anotherclown 281: 278: 273: 269: 262: 258: 257: 239: 238: 182: 181: 180: 165: 152:Citation bot 101: 87: 71: 46: 44: 35: 32: 59:MilHistBot 22:Assessment 259:Comments: 51:TomStar81 444:Comments 407:Comments 283:trainer. 183:Comments 147:Analysis 47:promoted 45:Article 20:‎ | 440:Support 337:support 263:Support 240:Support 139:Toolbox 117:history 358:above? 244:Nick-D 217:Nick-D 202:Nick-D 57:) via 526:Zawed 499:Zawed 483:Zawed 465:until 125:watch 121:links 16:< 530:talk 512:talk 487:talk 430:talk 387:talk 373:talk 327:talk 306:talk 291:talk 248:talk 228:talk 206:talk 173:talk 129:logs 113:talk 109:edit 94:talk 63:talk 55:talk 472:the 49:by 532:) 514:) 489:) 451:AR 432:) 417:) 389:) 375:) 329:) 308:) 293:) 250:) 230:) 208:) 175:) 127:| 123:| 119:| 115:| 111:| 65:) 528:( 510:( 501:: 497:@ 485:( 467:? 428:( 385:( 371:( 325:( 319:: 315:@ 304:( 289:( 246:( 226:( 219:: 215:@ 204:( 171:( 131:) 107:( 96:) 92:( 61:( 53:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
Assessment
TomStar81
talk
MilHistBot
talk
13:06, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
« Return to A-Class review list
2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion (Australia)
AustralianRupert
talk
2/2nd Machine Gun Battalion (Australia)
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
AustralianRupert
talk
20:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Nick-D
talk
23:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Nick-D
AustralianRupert
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.