Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ottawa/General

806:, which demonstrated NPOV issues. The description of the residents living south of Wellington as people who "no longer consider themselves part of the same community" was not backed up by citation. As someone who has been very active in the community for seven or eight years, I can note that the balance of activists in the area is split between north and south, and that issues of concern in the neighbourhood tend to be worked on by teams of people from across the area served by the Hintonburg Community Association. I've also deleted a reference to "run-down by Ottawa standards" as vague, replacing it with "has experienced some neglect." The reference to homes south of Wellington as "very expensive" was subjective (compared to what?), so I've replaced that with "steadily risen in price", which is more accurate and verifiable, I feel. I hope I've added to the article by adding to the description of the businesses in the area as mostly proprieter-run.-- 628:

include this description from Vanier, and I'll paraphrase: in recent years it has been tarnished by strip malls, low-end retail and subsidized housing. The use of the term tarnished when referring to the housing and commercial extablishments used by low-income people is definitely derogatory, and should not be included. Also, regarding the Riverview neighbourhood, calling Russel "infamous" for having a large proportion of low-income and black residents is not only contrary to NPOV but also potentially racist. How many people would describe neighbourhoods as being "infamous" for having a high concentration of whites? Knowledge (XXG) should not be used as a means of either elevating of degrading neighbourhoods based on the writers' personal bias either for or against said neighbourhood.

576:

think you are being childish and unfair in saying what you said. This person's opinions on the subject are as valid as yours and mine. I realise this user's first few edits were nonsense, but they have made several useful contributions since then. I'm sure a lot of poeple's first edits on wikipedia are not so useful, but everyone deserves a second chance, and your attitude will discourage new users from making valid contributions to wikipedia. I, personally, would rather see this person continue to stand up for the underprivileged of Ottawa. --

2384:

appropriate and point out the economic and cultural influences the cities have on each other, but I think we have to know where to draw the line and not overload information into one project. It's difficult enough trying to incorporate information from the various municipalities that were amalgamated into the larger Ottawa we are familiar with today. I move to make the legal geographic boundaries of Ottawa the place to stop on this project, or at least a starting point on discussions on where that boundary needs to be. --

2359:

makes a big project, it has influence on Gatineau, and it goes both ways! With the new Rapibus coming up, the impact on Ottawa is going to be HUMUNGOUS. Rapibus also made it very clear that links were tight, because for a while, it was thought that instead of moving tracks to lay a road for the Rapibus, they should use a LRT on the existing tracks. All that to say that Ottawa and Gatineau is linked, by economy, tourism (Civilizations Museum, Casino du Lac Leamy..), and it should be under the same Wikiproject IMO. --

1744:

because some editors might not agree with your proposed solution. Personally, I believe Ottawa and Gatineau are both in the same metropolitan region and both form the National Capital Region, so it seems logical to have them subject to the same template and Wikiproject. Perhaps the image on the template and/or the name of the Wikiproject need changing. That would be my approach, although others may disagree. That's why consensus should be achieved before making such significant edits.

2346:

travel services, Universities, Hospitals, school boards, tax rates, employment rates, pension contributions and dozens of other factors then it needs to remain Ottawa. I would definitely acknowledging Gatineau as a source of cultural enrichment with it's Museum of Civilization, shared resources for major festivals like Winterlude, and locations like Place du Portage as a significant employer of Ottawa residents, but in my mind, that's really where the similarties end. --

1153:. It doesn't make any sense to split Ottawa and Gatineau media since it is a single market. Moreover, some of the media which serves Gatineau is on the Ottawa side of the river (Le Droit, Radio Canada radio and television). It's one urban area -- I can't think of a valid reason for splitting it. May as well have "Category:Ottawa media west of Bank Street" and "Category:Ottawa media east of Bank Street". 590:

and the only comment on there that led me to question his commitment to Knowledge (XXG) so I asked him and still do, about the reason for his edit in Hurricane Katrina, which, although funny from my perspective, is somewhat inappropriate for that article... unless he was serious, in which case, as I stated, I could not find any news source which backed up his claims.

2270: 462: 218: 73: 2073:. I think it's fair for people in Gatineau to not want to be immediately lumped in with Ottawa any more than we Canadians would want to be included in the scope of Wikiproject USA, if such a thing exists ;) .. I think Wikiproject NCR is a worse name though.. it wouldn't mean anything to most people. 609:

Finally, although "stand up for the underprivileged of Ottawa" is a noble cause, I would think that removing non-NPOV is not the best example of this. Moreover, if someone did want to stand up for the underprivileged of Ottawa, doing it here in the Knowledge (XXG) is exactly the wrong place to do so

554:

Not sure exactly how to add this to the discussion, but I think a lot of the neighbourhood articles are not written in the neutral point of view. Specifically, I think the authors of the articles show an elitist attitude in the way they describe poorer or working class neighbourhoods. Terms like "a

2043:

The template OttawaProject should remain what it was before today and it should include all of Ottawa and Gatineau (plus theNCR region). Would not conflict on what is mentionned in the NCR article (areas included). Also the project it self should include all of Gatineau and Ottawa plus surroundings.

2006:

I would disagree with the proposed change to the template, and would suggest that the scope of the Project logically includes both Ottawa and Gatineau. The area is one metropolitan region, and forms the National Capital Region. It seems silly to have a project that includes the National Gallery of

1743:

That's a somewhat unilateral move, GreenJoe. The template did refer both to Ottawa and the National Capital Region, so was in fact, correctly applied to those articles. If you have issues with the scope of the template or the wikiproject, the better approach would have been to have raised it here,

1319:

I think "Lowertown" is just as valid as "Lower Town," if anything it looks a bit more natural to me. But the division between the Market and Lower Town is definately King Edward Ave, although I suspect the Market was once considered part of Lower Town, not the other way around (when Ottawa was just

558:

Can you point to specific examples of this lack of NPOV? And personally, I don't see anything wrong with your second term although I agree that the wording of the first term should be changed. Third, I must question the veracity of your claims as being from an IP address, I was curious if you had

2358:

I'm sorry but Gatineau IS part of the Canada's Capital city. Yes, they have different laws and etc... but their economy are linked TIGHT. This is not really about laws... The different laws is not something that we should be concerned of. Ottawa and Gatineau's economy work together, and when Ottawa

2241:

If the project is intended on being of 'administrative' use (official 'City of Ottawa' i.e. wards, city services, etc...) then it should include only Ottawa proper. There is, however, a large body of material that conforms to a much broader scope that focusses on the importantance of the area as it

2162:

If Ottawa itself can expand to include the suburban areas, it seems logical to include the entire national capital region in the scope of the template. This does not stop the formation of a separate "Pontiac county" project. When I drive into work I see a lot of vehicles crossing the bridges both

485:

I just really can't see many of these becoming more than excess stubs that could be combined into 1 article. (I can't think of 1 transitway station that "stands alone" as significant). But... I'm just an outside observer right now -- trying to understand why Carling station, of all places, needs a

2486:

A series of contributions were deleted being cited as vandalism, when in fact the information is actual factual information that has occured in this MMORPG GAME. Dogs, The Sa San Massacre, and the Curse filter are all RELEVANT and FACTUAL information for this small game of about 500 people. Please

822:

I just put his together about a surprisingly important part of the area's history, one which has been sadly neglected. As I'm not a local, however, I'm relying on my short visit last month, along with online research; if anyone local can add to/correct this, I'm sure it would improve it even more.

589:

Whoa, settle down there! At no time did I attack the anonymous user. However, I would qualify your calling me childish and unfair as a perfect example of one of these said attacks. I saw that it was an IP address so I was curious as to his involvement in Knowledge (XXG), I went to his talk page

575:

While I do agree that some of the neighbourhood articles use some derogatory wording in reference to low-income areas, I think some of the things that you (the unsigned) removed contained valid information, others however, are excellent NPOV rewordings. As for the personal attack by D'Iberville, I

285:

Wouldn't it be easier for the reader to have the schools listed under (Ottawa) rather than a miriad of other place names that one would have to be intimately familiar with? Gloucester, Orelans, Nepean, Cumberland, etc... Certainly the article could mention their location in closer detail, and have

2345:

So, if we're writing a tourist's guide to visiting Ottawa, then by all means call it the NCR or Ottawa-Gatineau. However, if we're trying to capture "Ottawa", Canada's Capital city, with it's unique language requirements, demographics, transportation, liquor laws, municipal government, inter-city

2228:

Thanks for the call for the "What is the scope" debate; I've recently found myself in some hot water on wiki with regard to some Places of Worship stubs in other Canadian Cities (Hamilton and Edmonton) where there wasn't a local Wikiproject. I have no problem with Gatineau included here, unless a

2113:

I don't think that's the issue that GreenJoe has raised. It's the practical issue of which talk pages a template can be applied to, raising a larger issue of the scope of the Wikiproject. Whereas I agree that we need not be rigid in our application of the template or the scope of the project, I

645:

Perhaps, but I find there is a tendency for the articles to gradually be reduced to a very bland geographic summary. OK, my edit of the Lowertown article first had any mention of the homeless shelters removed (fair enough), complaints about King Edward diluted (OK), my comment that it's a "poor"

627:

Okay, I am still learning how to use Knowledge (XXG) here. The Katrina edit was done by my 9yo child who thought it would be funny to pull such a prank and I made sure it didn't happen again. I do feel there are other statements regarding neighbourhoods that are also contrary to NPOV. Examples

2256:

From a 'academic' perspective, it makes sense to have these three divisions. From a usability standpoint, it makes more sense to have a single category for all of the relavent articles. In so far as Knowledge (XXG) does not attempt being (overtly) academic, I think the project should include the

2403:

Depending on what aspect of life you're talking about, Ottawa and Gatineau can be grouped together (like museums) or are worlds apart (transportation law). If Gatineau articles bleed into the Ottawa project, then so be it. If they become too much of a clutter, then the Gatineau people can fork.

2340:

Please let's also keep in mind that Gatineau and Ottawa do exist in two seperate provinces, with different laws, transportation systems, governments and regulations. The similarities are very superficial and mostly marketed from a tourism standpoint (thanks in large part to the National Capital

1806:, by changing the scope to include Gatineau and the NCR. You say it affects just the template. YOU ARE WRONG. It affects the project. You really should propose this to be re-named to WikiProject NCR if that is what you want. The founder himself told us that the scope was mean to just be Ottawa. 599:

One thing that I didn't do was reject his claims without base or state that his opinions were unimportant. To the contrary, I agreed with his assessment that "a mixture of poor and respectable" lacked a NPOV and asked that he point to specific articles which he thought were guilty of not being

2370:

My background is somewhat in publications, and one of the most important things that has to be determined is "What will be included". In a digital age, I think we are far too inclined to try to include as much information as humanly possible, sometimes to the detriment of the information being

754:

I have no issue with including information describing the burgeoning Francophone African communities in Lowertown and Vanier. However I felt that the previous wording did not express this. It simply provided a count of the number of black people in Lowertown with little context. I would object

2103:

Non-problem, per Peter M Dodge. Articles do not belong to a wikiproject, but to all editors, even un-registered ones. And if WP:Ottawa participants want to focus on any other article, so they should. If someone doesn't want to contribute to Gatineau related articles, there's no forcing them.

2383:

Lumber Baron Festival. It definitely ties their economic and cultural involvement into the city of Ottawa, but sometimes we have to learn where to stop. I think there is absolutely enough material for Gatineau to have it's own project and to link the two to demonstrate the integration where

903:

You did a great job, thanks bro! If y'all can help out and add {{OttawaProject}} to the top of the talk page on Ottawa related articles you create or find that don't have it. There's just too many for me to add it to all of them. Thanks a bunch! I discussed this on the strategy page.

1929:

simply requires that the opinions of other editors be solicited, not that they actually comment. The fact that you chose not to comment does not allow you to unilaterally reverse a previous process. And, yes, thank you, there should be a debate before NCR or Gatineau os excised.

716:

Ottawa's Lebanese population is far less than 10% of the population, and far less than half of the visible minorities, but is still notable and visible, no? Lowertown and Vanier are burgeoning Francophone African neighborhoods, it's not a racial targetting campaign to mention it.

141:

Ottawa is listed as four largest city in Ontario? FOURTH? well what are numbers 2 and 3 then? In another Knowledge (XXG) article, Hamilton is also named fourth largest city in Ontario. Isn't Ottawa the second largest, and Hamilton third??? Someone might want to check into this.

646:

neighborhood changed to "multicultural and diverse", then someone didn't like that I mentioned it was a notably African neighborhood (it is! I work there!), and so on. OK, who will even care to read what is left if we remove all "off-putting" or different facts about the city?

1840:

I have always (mostly) put that based on what was said on the National Capital Region Article (and actually I have probably forgot a few towns). We can have a debate over this, but most users (including I) will say that it includes areas that are mentionned in the NCR

31:

I'm looking to start an article on the municipal government, and we need a naming convention. I work at City Hall and the name of the corporation is "City of Ottawa", but this might be confusing to readers if used as an article title. So are there any other ideas?

369:

should be merged into the O-Train and Transitway articles, and I see no reason where there is both an O-Train and Transitway station article that they cannot be merged. For simplicity sake, merge the Greenboro O-Train article into the Transitway article.

265:

Requests for address changes could be due to amalgamation, as is the case in Ottawa, or as a result of civic addressing in rural areas to implement 911 emergency service. Whatever the case, Canada Post does not change addresses, that decision is left to

437:

Sortof on a related note, why do all the Transitway stations -- particularly O-Train stations -- need separate entries? I'm a little confused as to the reason, so feel free to enlighten :) I'd understand if this were a travel guide, but... --

2016:

The project doesn't have any more say on an article than any other editors would, however, semantic dicking around about scope is unnecessarily divisive and I don't see it helping the project in any way, let alone the encyclopedia. Cheers, ✎

2197:

created a set of Gatineau-specific categories. Other Canadian city WikiProjects specifically cover neighbouring communities as well as the main city of focus. And projects specifically cover whatever the general consensus of involved editors

1576:

I've updated the demographics section and also moved population history to a new page. I doubt anyone visiting a city's page on wikipedia would be interested to see population history from 1901 and agglomeration from 1851 on the main page.

1276:

Please don't change my comments. Lowertown and Lower Town are used interchangeably. The former is more contemporary, and the latter is more historical. Even the city's own website uses both spellings, although Lowertown is more common.

2375:? People commute to Ottawa daily and access its resources from Hawkesbury, Cornwall, Smiths Falls, Prescott, Alexandria, Golden Lake, Eganville and all places in between. People regularly travel to Ottawa, and make day trips to the 1024:, but a quick search on the CRTC site suggests that "CBOT-TV" is never actually used; even in decisions that refer to other stations as CXXX-TV, CBOT is always just CBOT. Can anybody confirm what the preferred form is in this case? 2163:

ways every day, so it is not hard to argure that the NCR is one ecconomy, and others have mentioned media outlets as an example - indeed all the ottawa TV and FM stations have transmission equipment at camp fortune in the Pontiac.

1123:

But it's a single media market. If multiple cities are defined as a single media market, then by Knowledge (XXG) rules the category or categories have to encompass the whole market, not separate categories for each city. See e.g.

253:

Canada Post is not "urging" anyone to move quickly to transform rural postal codes into a larger city one. It is our mandate to deliver mail to existing addresses and the only time those addresses change is at the request of the

2471:

notes that Blackburn Hamlet is locally known as "The Hamlet". I would disagree and say at it is more commonly referred simply as "Blackburn" than as "The Hamlet". It is a hard thing to reference, so I'm looking for a consensus.

329:

I was just looking at the entry for Ottawa Technical High School and as an alumni of that fine institution I believe that it was written by someone with absolutely no idea of the school. Does anyone check their facts ? Dave

207:? I think it should be the first one because it's all Ottawa now, but Earl Andrew disagrees, he thinks it should be the latter, trying to argue that it's not all Ottawa, it's the City of Ottawa, but somehow they're seperate. -- 1432:

on Knowledge (XXG). I've never heard of this, and google's only hits are Knowledge (XXG) mirrors. Unless someone can provide some sources indicating that this name is actually used, I think that the article should be deleted.

1677:

has been proceeding on deleting the Wikiproject Ottawa template on Gatineau articles, but the template itself specifies that the project includes articles within the National Capital Region and that according to the article

1320:

made up of Upper and Lower Town--think about it). As an aside, try looking up a picture of how King Edward used to be and you'll realize just how much this neighborhood was ruined by aggressive city planning.

993:

parent category? There's no issue with it on Knowledge (XXG) policy grounds; a lot of American media markets already have their TV and radio stations separated out this way (though Ottawa is so far the only

357:)! I think we should try to come to some agreement on how this should be laid out, and I personally vote for merging intermodal stations that are in the same facility (as both Greenboro and Bayview are). 786:

For what it's worth, I was also struck by some of the wording used in describing neighbourhood demographics, even before discovering this talk page topic; so there's still some work to be done here.

2057:

Ottawa being the national capital, I suggest that the scope of the project is for articles of the national capital region. Worst case scenario... The project COULD be renamed to WikiProject NCR. --

2044:(NCR)). Actually, maybe we should also include all the Ottawa Valley (Renfrew, Arnprior and Pembrooke as well as the Pontiac, Maniwaki and Papineau regions (basically all the Outaouais region)-- 1855: 1623:

When I started the project, it, folks was for OTTAWA only. Not Gatineau, not the NCR. Just the amalgamated city of Ottawa. That's the scope. Gatineau should go and start their own project.

2267:

I've always thought that the project encompassed all that is within the National Capital Region. If anything it should include all that is within the NCR and no need for name changing. --

2295:

I don't know if we achived consensus or something, but for me it's clear that Wikiproject Ottawa includes Gatineau. If it's such a big deal, then let's rename it to Ottawa-Gatineau --

2181:

include Gatineau, whether that was the creator's original intention or not. Ottawa and Gatineau are a single metropolitan area. They're a single media market. Entities such as the

2257:

Greater Ottawa Area. Renaming the project to include a reference to the NCR is (I think) a bad idea. It doesn't have a whole lot of meaning outside Ottawa or federal government.

876:, if anyone wants to edit/add to it. specifically, i was unsure of the exact boundaries, i did my best from what i could find out, but if anyone knows more, feel free to edit. -- 1862:. I waited two weeks, nobody objected, so I made the edit. In other words, I did not make a unilateral change, and I gave other editors the opporunity to comment or object. 2445:. This requires administrator intervention since the article had that name before. See my reasons and comment for or against on the talk page for Tulip Festival (Ottawa): 2337:

Ottawa, and not the NCR, is Canada's Capital, but due to the proximity of the resources, it is often referred to as Canada's Capital Region (never Greater Ottawa Area).

614: 1345:

Do the dictionary test: If you can find references to "Lowertown" in reputable media outlets (mass or otherwise), then it is acceptable. I, however, subscribe to the

1682:

it does includes Gatineau as well as Cantley, Chelsea and other surronding areas and the templates thus must be kept. I've sent him a message in regards to that.--

2341:

Commission). Students from Ottawa who wish to pursue post-secondary studies in Gatineau pay out-of-province fees to do so, even if the University is in Gatineau).

1864:

In any event, what I may have done, or may not have done, is not relevant. What "the founder" may or may not have told you is irrelevant. What is relevant is

2334:

Ottawa is not the NCR, Ottawa is a part of the NCR and is no greater or lesser than any other component of the NCR (which is primarily thought of as Gatineau).

51:

If you're doing an article on the City as a corporation, I think "City of Ottawa" is best. Anything else might be too confusing. There's already an article on

1868:, and if you want to make significant changes, esp. when there are other editors who seem taken aback by them, then allow for there to be a discussion first. 1641:

Spinboy, or GreenJoe, if you disagree, raise the issue again and try to seek consensus to reverse the edit. Your views do not govern the matter. Thanks.

683:. Singling out a group which makes up less than half of the visible minorities and only about 10% of the entire population didn't seem to have any value. 1137: 2449:. I might also point out in light of the recent discussion here on project scope that the tulip festival does encompass both sides of the river. 1129: 569: 2114:

don't think anyone is suggesting that articles belong to a particular wikiproject, or what articles project participants must contribute to.

2007:

Canada, but ignores that Canadian Museum of Civilization that is barely a stone's throw away. It's one urban area - let's have one project.

1793:. Please engage in discussion before you go making significant changes, as not everyone necessarily agrees with your wholesale edits today. 1591:

The images on the page are good and I don't want to remove any, but I think the positioning can be better. Anyone want to take a stab at it ?

145:

Rank in 2001 City Population 1 Toronto 4,682,897 2 Montreal 3,426,350 3 Vancouver 1,986,965 4 Ottawa/Hull 1,063,664 5 Calgary 951,395

555:

mixture of poor and respectable" businesses and "high density, low class housing" do not belong in an encyclopedia which is supposedly NPOV.

509:

will help you decide whether you want the transitway stops to be in combined or separate. Specifically, the links in the box on the right. --

1382:(just a small selection). To be fair, the city does use both terms. Google says the city uses Lower Town 102 times vs. Lowertown 161 times. 1255:

As an added bit of confusion, I think that Stats Canada actually considers Lowertown to extend one block further south, to Besserer Street.

1133: 1125: 109:

This article would differ in that it would discuss the city as a corporation rather than as a political entity. Putting this content under

1544: 1362: 1237:. This leaves little room for Lowertown! So what is the general consensus? Does Lowertown exist, or is it just part of the Byward Market? 349:

has seemed to have suffered from entropy lately - there are now separate articles for each service, and even for their stations (witness

2281: 2307:

Nevermind what I said, I'm pretty sure articles on Mississauga are under Wikiproject Toronto. Why Gatineau shouldnt be under Ottawa? --

506: 1405:

I agree that the Byward market is part of lowertown. I would say it's borders are canal, river, river, rideau street. (Besserer is in

2128: 268: 677:

Lower Town is home to a wide variety of immigrants and visible minorities, of which there are 2495 of the latter (including 1025 of

1178:

I created the article today, it seriously needs expansion, so if anyone works there or has some top rate info, please add it in. --

1679: 650: 580: 2132: 2503: 2186: 2127:

It seems reasonable that the Ottawa Wikiproject covers everything in the Greater Ottawa Area, including those parts in Quebec.

1358: 17: 2083:

It doesn't yet. That's the point of the debate. One user decided the talk page template should include the NCR and gatineau.

1374: 403: 982: 425:

I like that idea, I'll update the naming convention for that. We should do that for all of them, transitway and o-train. --

1789:

Not clear what you are talking about. Even if you have problems with other editors, that does not entitle you to ignore

1560: 1532: 928:

I just went through all the links on the list of ottawa buidings and added it to all the articles that didnt have it. --

407: 350: 1003: 2520: 2242:

relates to being the capital of Canada. To break it down in purely administrative terms, there would be projects for:

2182: 1610: 1039: 990: 2446: 1854:. Before making any unilateral edit, I raised the issue on the talk page, and posted notice of the issue on both 2468: 2460: 1516: 1509: 1377: 382: 354: 204: 200: 114: 2177:

If it'll end the argument, please do consider renaming the project, but there's really no logical reason why it

802:

Hi, I'm new as a Knowledge (XXG) user, so please forgive any lapses in protocol. I've edited the description of

565:

Could you explain this as I have looked in many news sources and have not found and proofs backing your edits.--

2025: 851:

Super job, indeed. I remember reading an article in the Ottawa Sun about it, but this just about covers it. --

1380: 2442: 2438: 2431: 2277: 1976: 1066:

Well, the main reason I created it as Ottawa-Gatineau is that if it's just "Ottawa media", it can't include

386: 55:. Corporation of the City of Ottawa could be a redirect, but I wouldn't make that the main article title. -- 2491: 2069:

Ahhh.. I wasn't aware that it included Gatineau, although it reasonably could. If so it should be renamed

2019: 1766:

and really, you should have discussed it here, not on some template talk page, and gave plenty of notice.

1366: 816: 1897:

I think we should have a debate over this. No one contributed to the last one on the template talk page.

1294:

No links go to "Lowertown". They all go to Lower Town. In fact, I've never seen "Lowertown" in usage. --

1998: 1954: 1713:

Then if it's the case we would have to remove "National Capital Region" in the Ottawa Project template--

1480: 1448: 1369:. Using google, I can't find a single reference to Lower Town in either of these papers. Also, from the 1299: 1264: 1046:. I think it should go to TV stations in Ottawa, newspapers in Ottawa, radio stations in Ottawa, etc. -- 891: 856: 486:

stub. (Mmmm... elevator & platform. Tax dollars at work :D). I guess I preferred the old format. --

469: 225: 80: 2371:

presented. So do we stop at the Ottawa city boundaries, or Ottawa-Gatineau, or Ottawa-Gatineau and the

610:

as Knowledge (XXG) can not take a position on a social cause, no matter how just you or I may see it.--

66:

We already have an article on the city council. How would this particular article differ. And wouldn't

755:

similarly to an article which mentioned the number of Lebanese in Ottawa with no additional context.

366: 346: 67: 2495: 2499: 2190: 2164: 873: 239:

yet because it's quite expensive to harmonize all of the former municipalities to become Ottawa. --

110: 52: 2473: 2420: 1592: 1456: 191:

I suspect this is a typo, and meant to say Ottawa is the 4th largest city in Canada, not Ontario.

2273: 1410: 1241: 929: 877: 787: 577: 611: 566: 2476: 2453: 2423: 2408: 2388: 2365: 2350: 2322: 2313: 2301: 2289: 2261: 2236: 2222: 2167: 2139: 2118: 2108: 2096: 2087: 2077: 2063: 2048: 2038: 2011: 2001: 1987: 1961: 1934: 1901: 1875: 1845: 1823: 1810: 1797: 1770: 1757: 1748: 1726: 1717: 1704: 1686: 1654: 1645: 1636: 1617: 1599: 1581: 1565: 1537: 1496: 1483: 1470: 1451: 1437: 1413: 1386: 1353: 1324: 1302: 1281: 1267: 1213: 1189: 1157: 1144: 1106: 1082: 1057: 1032: 960: 932: 915: 894: 880: 859: 842: 810: 790: 759: 721: 687: 549: 513: 472: 450: 287: 185: 168: 134: 118: 44: 1625: 1549: 1521: 1461: 1244:, and Lowertown extends from King Edward in the west to the Ridea River in the east, and the 1204: 1180: 1097: 1048: 951: 906: 833: 176: 2416: 2405: 2385: 2380: 2347: 2319: 2258: 2233: 2115: 2093: 2074: 2008: 1994: 1931: 1872: 1794: 1745: 1642: 1614: 1476: 1444: 1350: 1321: 1295: 1260: 1154: 887: 852: 718: 647: 546: 543: 510: 465: 446:

That's a good question. Unless they have an extensive, notable history, do they need one? --

221: 94:

I think Government of Ottawa is too confusing, it makes me think of Government of Canada. --

76: 2031: 1926: 1865: 1851: 1816: 1790: 675:

It was I who removed the reference to it being an African neighbourhood. The article read:

531: 2218:

it to" — which, needless to say, falls pretty short in the compelling logic department.

561:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hurricane_Katrina&diff=prev&oldid=22115331

2450: 2376: 678: 539: 535: 129: 1819:, you too are guilty of ignoring it. You never got consensus to change that template. 1753:

You never achieved consensus. You made a similar unilateral move. I went and checked.

2514: 2372: 2084: 1984: 1958: 1898: 1820: 1807: 1767: 1754: 1723: 1701: 1674: 1651: 1346: 1249: 1230: 1229:

article, but ran into some problem when I started trying to describe its extent. The

824: 411: 358: 148: 2219: 2149: 2045: 1842: 1714: 1683: 1631: 1555: 1527: 1467: 1245: 1234: 1210: 1186: 1150: 1141: 1103: 1079: 1054: 1029: 957: 912: 839: 831:

Great job! :-) I would add to it, but alas, I don't know all that much about it. --

807: 447: 426: 390: 371: 306: 271: 240: 208: 182: 95: 56: 37:

This article is about the municipal government. For more general information, see

886:

Looks really good. The boundaries mentioned are deffinitely at its broadest :) --

35:

We could also put it in as "City of Ottawa" and have one of those tags that says

2360: 2308: 2296: 2136: 2058: 1596: 1578: 1493: 1434: 1383: 1278: 756: 684: 459:

They are encyclopedic, as metro stations all around the world have articles. --

236: 2404:

Neither one affects how I will edit Ottawa and Ottawa-area related articles. --

1489: 1406: 803: 559:

any previous edits and what they were. You do have a few but one stands out:

487: 439: 2269: 1650:

I obviously am raising the issue. What Spinboy chooses to do, is up to him.

1429: 1422: 1226: 1219: 1013: 461: 217: 174:

It could refer to geographically, because in those terms, Ottawa is huge. --

72: 1762:

Besides, this change affects not just the stupid template, but the entire

1016:

to allow for disambiguation. Usually the suffix used in dab situations is

2193:, etc.) were continually being filed in Ottawa-specific categories until 2105: 1972: 1172: 1043: 305:

That's what I would think, and you could have for example ] point to ] --

1475:

This area is like a subdivision. They have been deleted in the past. --

1233:

article claims that the market neighbourhood extends all the way to the

1665:

Wikiproject Ottawa templates in Gatineau articles/Scope of Wikiproject

989:

to use this, or would you prefer to leave the TV stations in the main

2206:

have any special veto power. Meanwhile, the only argument we've seen

38: 2210:

including Gatineau is located in the immediate vicinity of "because

2092:

GreenJoe, please stop mischaracterizing what happened. Thank you.

1609:

I have proposed a minor rewording of the OttawaProject template at

117:-- they are connected, but separate components of the government. - 1202:

I created {{OttawaMember}} for folks to put on their user page. --

2419:, no hard and fast rule, but rather taking context into account. 2318:

Just because someone else has done it, does not make it right. --

1075: 1071: 1067: 999: 1138:

Category:Television stations in Sacramento / Stockton / Modesto

1428:

While we're on the topic of neighbourhoods, I just discovered

1002:

has actually been filed there, and as of today the equivalent

1856:

Knowledge (XXG):Canadian wikipedians' notice board/discussion

2202:

to include in them; the original creator of a project does

2185:

have jurisdiction in both cities. Gatineau-related topics (

1259:

I believe that the Byward Market is part of Lower Town. --

1130:

Category:Television stations in Albany / Schenectady / Troy

977:

Hey y'all...a couple of media-related questions for you.

1519:

about addition of POV material to the U of O article. --

1443:

That's a possibility. I've never heard of it either. --

560: 389:. Those were the only two duplicates I came accross. -- 2285: 1134:

Category:Television stations in Minneapolis-Saint Paul

1126:

Category:Television stations in Flint-Saginaw-Bay City

998:

market for which this has been done, and so far only

235:

That's because the city hasn't changed all that with

1078:or any of the other stations licensed to Gatineau. 402:

Thanks. I've now gone in and renamed both of those (

1370: 2430:Proposed renaming to Canadian Tulip Festival from 872:I just made an article for the neighbourhood of 2131:explicitly covers surrounding communities, and 1957:is being . Your input is requested. Thank you. 1042:because there aren't any other categories for 113:would be like putting information on PWGSC in 2148:i agree with simonP, based on his reasoning. 8: 1850:My last edit to the template conformed with 1547:, one of the disputants in above article. -- 410:) to names that don't preclude either mode. 286:redirect from their more specific location. 215:Well, the shcool's address is in Nepean. -- 2447:Talk:Tulip_Festival_(Ottawa)#Requested_move 1488:I've been bold and redirected K-Lau-Bro to 1194:Done and done.05:16, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 1860:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ottawa/General 1698:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ottawa/General 1971:The issue: Does this WikiProject include 1624: 1548: 1520: 1460: 1240:In my opinion, the Byward Market ends at 1203: 1179: 1096: 1095:Right. Let them do their own category. -- 1047: 950: 905: 832: 385:to its transitway article, and same with 175: 2229:separate Gatineau Wikiproject is sought. 1140:, etc. One media market = one category. 823:Any comments would also be appreciated! 2252:Federal Government of Canada facilities 1967:The official "What is the scope" debate 1802:Your little change affects the entire 983:Category:Television stations in Ottawa 542:. I invite additions and corrections. 2129:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Vancouver 7: 2330:Here are my thoughts on the matter: 2133:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Toronto 345:The relatively coherent article at 24: 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ottawa 2135:also sometimes covers the GTA. - 1004:Category:Radio stations in Ottawa 2268: 1692:Does not. The project name says 1680:National Capital Region (Canada) 460: 216: 71: 2482:Nexus: The Kingdom of the Winds 2467:I noticed that the article for 2187:Canadian Museum of Civilization 1871:Oh, and welcome back Spinboy. 2463:known locally as "The Hamlet"? 1618:13:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC) 1595:is how it looks in 1920x1200. 1040:Category:Ottawa-Gatineau media 991:Category:Ottawa-Gatineau media 404:Greenboro Station (OC Transpo) 128:I have started the article at 1: 2477:21:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2437:I am proposing to rename the 2424:21:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1600:20:29, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1582:20:29, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1543:There's an RfC in regards to 1158:15:05, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 827:01:44, August 12, 2005 (UTC) 791:22:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 760:21:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 722:14:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 688:04:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 651:18:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2409:05:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2389:16:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 1566:00:48, 25 October 2005 (UTC) 1538:16:55, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 1497:15:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1484:06:18, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1471:06:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1452:06:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1438:03:38, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1414:00:17, 1 November 2005 (UTC) 1387:23:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 1354:20:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 1325:15:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC) 1303:03:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1282:03:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1268:02:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 1214:21:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 1190:18:25, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 1145:22:25, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 1107:22:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 1083:22:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 1058:20:19, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 1033:20:10, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 961:22:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 933:16:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 916:05:21, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 895:20:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 881:19:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 811:20:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 615:10:33, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 581:05:13, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 570:23:48, 1 November 2005 (UTC) 530:I have created articles for 514:07:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 408:Bayview Station (OC Transpo) 351:Greenboro Transitway Station 186:06:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC) 169:06:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC) 2366:21:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2351:19:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2323:19:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2314:23:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 2302:23:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 2290:17:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 2262:23:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2237:22:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2223:17:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2183:National Capital Commission 2168:13:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2140:00:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2119:11:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2109:21:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2097:11:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2088:21:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2078:21:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2071:Wikiproject Ottawa-Gatineau 2064:21:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2049:20:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2039:20:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2012:20:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2002:20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1988:20:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1975:and the other areas of the 1962:20:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1935:20:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1902:20:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1876:20:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1846:20:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1824:19:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1811:19:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1798:19:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1771:19:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1758:19:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1749:19:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1727:19:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1718:19:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1705:19:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1687:19:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1655:20:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1646:20:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1637:19:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 1611:Template talk:OttawaProject 860:03:37, 12 August 2005 (UTC) 843:02:04, 12 August 2005 (UTC) 2537: 1562:No ads on Knowledge (XXG). 1534:No ads on Knowledge (XXG). 1515:There's a dispute over at 1349:story, "In Lower Town." -- 1006:has not yet been created.) 361:14:20, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC) 137:23:22, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC) 1696:, not Gatineau. See also 1517:Talk:University of Ottawa 1510:Talk:University of Ottawa 1038:Personally, I don't like 550:21:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 414:03:32, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC) 383:Greenboro O-Train Station 381:I've gone and redirected 355:Greenboro O-Train Station 205:Bell High School (Nepean) 201:Bell High School (Ottawa) 115:Canadian House of Commons 47:23:42, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC) 2454:14:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 2379:Garlic Festival, or the 1993:I don't see why not. -- 442:17:27, 2005 May 4 (UTC) 429:03:42, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) 393:17:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) 374:16:35, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) 290:03:08, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC) 211:21:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 121:03:20, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC) 2443:Canadian Tulip Festival 2439:Tulip Festival (Ottawa) 2432:Tulip Festival (Ottawa) 1977:National Capital Region 1371:City of Ottawa web site 490:15:07, 2005 May 5 (UTC) 473:19:48, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 451:18:14, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 387:Bayview O-Train Station 309:03:22, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) 274:22:43, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 243:22:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 228:21:48, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 199:At issue: For example: 98:06:27, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 83:06:10, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 59:05:44, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1605:OttawaProject Template 817:Prince of Wales Bridge 1225:I started creating a 1951:NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT 1627:File:Ottawa flag.png 1572:Demographics Section 1551:File:Ottawa flag.png 1523:File:Ottawa flag.png 1463:File:Ottawa flag.png 1206:File:Ottawa flag.png 1182:File:Ottawa flag.png 1099:File:Ottawa flag.png 1050:File:Ottawa flag.png 953:File:Ottawa flag.png 908:File:Ottawa flag.png 835:File:Ottawa flag.png 507:this article on Meta 367:Ottawa Rapid Transit 347:Ottawa Rapid Transit 178:File:Ottawa flag.png 68:Government of Ottawa 2191:Casino du Lac Leamy 111:Ottawa City Council 53:Ottawa City Council 2521:WikiProject Ottawa 2033:Neutrality Project 1955:WikiProject Ottawa 1804:WikiProject Ottawa 1670:Earlier discission 1587:Page images layout 1242:King Edward Avenue 341:Transitway/O-Train 2508: 2494:comment added by 1979:, or not? I vote 981:Somebody created 2528: 2507: 2488: 2487:look into this. 2469:Blackburn Hamlet 2461:Blackburn Hamlet 2272: 2249:City of Gatineau 2037: 2034: 2028: 2022: 1634: 1630: 1628: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1552: 1535: 1530: 1526: 1524: 1466: 1464: 1248:in the north to 1209: 1207: 1185: 1183: 1102: 1100: 1053: 1051: 956: 954: 911: 909: 838: 836: 464: 220: 181: 179: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 75: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2511: 2510: 2489: 2484: 2465: 2435: 2032: 2026: 2020: 2018: 1969: 1722:I already did. 1672: 1667: 1632: 1626: 1607: 1589: 1574: 1561: 1556: 1550: 1545:Anakinskywalker 1533: 1528: 1522: 1513: 1462: 1426: 1223: 1205: 1200: 1181: 1176: 1098: 1049: 985:...do you guys 975: 952: 907: 870: 834: 820: 532:Centretown West 528: 343: 266:municipalities. 197: 177: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2534: 2532: 2524: 2523: 2513: 2512: 2483: 2480: 2464: 2457: 2434: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2412: 2411: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2293: 2292: 2254: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2246:City of Ottawa 2231: 2230: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2143: 2142: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2067: 2066: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2014: 1968: 1965: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1848: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1813: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1708: 1707: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1606: 1603: 1588: 1585: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1512: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1363:Ottawa Citizen 1359:Ottawa Citizen 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1271: 1270: 1252:in the south. 1222: 1217: 1199: 1196: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1061: 1060: 1026: 1025: 1007: 974: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 949:Thanks. :-) -- 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 921: 920: 919: 918: 898: 897: 869: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 846: 845: 819: 814: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 620: 619: 618: 617: 604: 603: 602: 601: 594: 593: 592: 591: 584: 583: 540:Ottawa SuperEX 538:, and one for 536:Lebreton Flats 527: 526:Neighbourhoods 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 478: 477: 476: 475: 454: 453: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 418: 417: 416: 415: 397: 396: 395: 394: 376: 375: 342: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 319: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 278: 277: 276: 275: 259: 258: 257: 256: 247: 246: 245: 244: 230: 229: 196: 193: 189: 188: 144: 140: 130:City of Ottawa 125: 124: 123: 122: 104: 103: 102: 101: 100: 99: 87: 86: 85: 84: 70:work best? -- 61: 60: 28: 27:City of Ottawa 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2533: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2516: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2481: 2479: 2478: 2475: 2470: 2462: 2458: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2418: 2415:I agree with 2414: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2390: 2387: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2373:Ottawa Valley 2369: 2368: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2349: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2324: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2300: 2299: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2251: 2248: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2235: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2169: 2166: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2151: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2120: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2102: 2098: 2095: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2076: 2072: 2065: 2062: 2061: 2056: 2050: 2047: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2035: 2029: 2023: 2021:Peter M Dodge 2015: 2013: 2010: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1966: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1956: 1953:the scope of 1952: 1936: 1933: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1903: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1869: 1867: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1847: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1825: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1812: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1772: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1747: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1676: 1675:User:GreenJoe 1669: 1664: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1629: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1612: 1604: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1594: 1586: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1559: 1553: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1536: 1531: 1525: 1518: 1511: 1508: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1465: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1436: 1431: 1424: 1421: 1415: 1412: 1411:Someones life 1408: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1378: 1375: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1347:Norman Levine 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1326: 1323: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1304: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1283: 1280: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1250:Rideau Street 1247: 1243: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1231:Byward Market 1228: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1184: 1174: 1171: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1149:I agree with 1148: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1012:was moved to 1011: 1008: 1005: 1001: 997: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 978: 972: 962: 959: 955: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 934: 931: 930:Someones life 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 917: 914: 910: 902: 901: 900: 899: 896: 893: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 879: 878:Someones life 875: 867: 861: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 847: 844: 841: 837: 830: 829: 828: 826: 818: 815: 813: 812: 809: 805: 792: 789: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 761: 758: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 723: 720: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 689: 686: 682: 680: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 652: 649: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 616: 613: 608: 607: 606: 605: 598: 597: 596: 595: 588: 587: 586: 585: 582: 579: 578:Someones life 574: 573: 572: 571: 568: 563: 562: 556: 552: 551: 548: 545: 541: 537: 533: 525: 515: 512: 508: 505:I think that 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 489: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 474: 471: 467: 463: 458: 457: 456: 455: 452: 449: 445: 444: 443: 441: 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379: 378: 377: 373: 368: 364: 363: 362: 360: 356: 352: 348: 340: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 308: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 289: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 273: 269: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 255: 254:municipality. 251: 250: 249: 248: 242: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 219: 214: 213: 212: 210: 206: 202: 194: 192: 187: 184: 180: 173: 172: 171: 170: 167: 143: 138: 136: 132: 131: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 106: 105: 97: 93: 92: 91: 90: 89: 88: 82: 78: 74: 69: 65: 64: 63: 62: 58: 54: 50: 49: 48: 46: 42: 40: 33: 26: 19: 2485: 2466: 2436: 2400: 2361: 2344: 2329: 2309: 2297: 2294: 2255: 2240: 2232: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2178: 2176: 2070: 2068: 2059: 1980: 1970: 1950: 1949: 1870: 1863: 1859: 1803: 1763: 1697: 1693: 1673: 1608: 1590: 1575: 1514: 1427: 1254: 1246:Ottawa River 1239: 1235:Rideau River 1224: 1201: 1198:New Template 1193: 1177: 1027: 1021: 1020:rather than 1017: 1009: 995: 986: 976: 871: 821: 801: 676: 564: 557: 553: 529: 436: 344: 318: 288:Peregrine981 264: 252: 198: 190: 147: 139: 135:Joshuapaquin 127: 126: 119:Joshuapaquin 45:Joshuapaquin 36: 34: 30: 2490:—Preceding 2441:article to 2417:RealGrouchy 2406:RealGrouchy 2401:don't care. 2386:Waterspyder 2348:Waterspyder 2320:Waterspyder 2259:Paulshannon 2234:Bacl-presby 2116:Skeezix1000 2094:Skeezix1000 2075:Dan Carkner 2009:Skeezix1000 1995:Earl Andrew 1932:Skeezix1000 1873:Skeezix1000 1795:Skeezix1000 1746:Skeezix1000 1643:Skeezix1000 1615:Skeezix1000 1477:Earl Andrew 1445:Earl Andrew 1351:RealGrouchy 1322:Dan Carkner 1296:Earl Andrew 1261:Earl Andrew 1155:Skeezix1000 888:Earl Andrew 853:Earl Andrew 719:Dan Carkner 648:Dan Carkner 612:D'Iberville 567:D'Iberville 547:Ground Zero 544:Ground Zero 511:RealGrouchy 466:Earl Andrew 237:Canada Post 222:Earl Andrew 77:Earl Andrew 2027:Talk to Me 1841:article.-- 1490:Centretown 1407:Sandy Hill 1367:Ottawa Sun 874:Alta Vista 868:Alta Vista 804:Hintonburg 2496:Int3rnaut 2451:Canadiana 2179:shouldn't 1430:K-Lau-Bro 1423:K-Lau-Bro 1227:Lowertown 1220:Lowertown 1014:CBOT (TV) 2515:Category 2504:contribs 2492:unsigned 2085:GreenJoe 1985:GreenJoe 1973:Gatineau 1959:GreenJoe 1899:GreenJoe 1821:GreenJoe 1808:GreenJoe 1768:GreenJoe 1755:GreenJoe 1724:GreenJoe 1702:GreenJoe 1652:GreenJoe 1597:sikander 1579:sikander 1173:Farm Boy 1044:Gatineau 1028:Thanks. 996:Canadian 825:Radagast 681:origin). 600:neutral. 412:Radagast 365:I think 359:Radagast 2474:Trellis 2421:Trellis 2381:Renfrew 2220:Bearcat 2208:against 2200:chooses 2150:AceGT09 2046:JForget 1843:JForget 1815:As for 1764:project 1715:JForget 1684:JForget 1633:Spinboy 1557:Spinboy 1529:Spinboy 1468:Spinboy 1211:Spinboy 1187:Spinboy 1151:Bearcat 1142:Bearcat 1104:Spinboy 1080:Bearcat 1055:Spinboy 1030:Bearcat 958:Spinboy 913:Spinboy 840:Spinboy 808:Jleiper 788:derrick 679:African 448:Spinboy 427:Spinboy 391:Spinboy 372:Spinboy 330:Malette 307:Spinboy 272:Spinboy 241:Spinboy 209:Spinboy 195:Schools 183:Spinboy 96:Spinboy 57:Spinboy 2362:Deenoe 2310:Deenoe 2298:Deenoe 2274:Eric B 2214:don't 2137:SimonP 2060:Deenoe 1927:WP:CON 1866:WP:CON 1852:WP:CON 1817:WP:CON 1791:WP:CON 1694:Ottawa 1494:Pburka 1457:BJAODN 1435:Pburka 1384:Pburka 1279:Pburka 757:Pburka 685:Pburka 39:Ottawa 2377:Perth 2165:cmacd 1409:.) -- 973:Media 488:Dunro 440:Dunro 16:< 2500:talk 2216:want 1999:talk 1858:and 1593:This 1481:talk 1459:? -- 1449:talk 1300:talk 1265:talk 1076:CKTF 1072:CFGS 1068:CHOT 1022:(TV) 1010:CBOT 1000:CHRO 987:want 892:talk 857:talk 534:and 470:talk 406:and 226:talk 81:talk 2459:Is 2204:not 2106:Qyd 1365:, 1018:-TV 203:or 133:. - 2517:: 2506:) 2502:• 2399:I 2288:) 2284:• 2280:• 2276:( 2189:, 2104:-- 2030:• 2024:( 1997:- 1983:. 1981:no 1700:. 1613:. 1492:. 1479:- 1447:- 1379:, 1376:, 1373:: 1361:, 1298:- 1263:- 1136:, 1132:, 1128:, 1074:, 1070:, 904:-- 890:- 855:- 468:- 370:-- 270:-- 224:- 165:e 162:ev 159:St 156:e 79:- 2498:( 2286:W 2282:C 2278:T 2212:I 2195:I 2036:) 353:/ 153:h 150:T 43:- 41:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Ottawa/General - Knowledge (XXG)

Index