Knowledge (XXG)

:Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

76: 24: 210:
This also applies to your user page. Many Wikipedians frown on the use of user pages or subpages to disseminate opinions. There are plenty of sites around the web that you can use to spread your opinion to the world. Your Knowledge (XXG) user page and subpages are intended to aid in the construction
223:
You may see yourself as a daring investigative reporter, contacting everyone from anonymous sources to people in positions in power, hoping to learn the truth about a subject. Through your myriad of connections, you uncover the scoop of the century. Knowledge (XXG) is simply dying for this scoop,
246:
Note that, if you first publish your scoop in a reliable, reviewable source, like the Washington Post, the article that it appears in can then be used as a source in a Knowledge (XXG) article. However, it must appear in independent media first. This is one of the quirks of
97:
in the world. Some newspaper articles are features that contain longer coverage and analysis. Newspapers can also disseminate the opinion of those who write them or expose secrets or lies. Newspapers write information that may be
153:
Due to the inherent biases of Knowledge (XXG) editors, there tends to be a lot more written on topics that have occurred more recently, especially events following Knowledge (XXG)'s founding. For more on this phenomenon, see
150:
Knowledge (XXG) does not report on everything going on in the world today. There is usually no need to write articles about things with no historical significance whatsoever.
207:. Injecting your point of view into articles is considered unacceptable. If you're blatant enough about it, you could be labeled a vandal. 86: 39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
40: 204: 240: 182: 161:
When editing Knowledge (XXG) to reflect current news, always ask yourself if you are adding something truly encyclopedic and
236: 232: 110: 290: 227:
Wrong. Knowledge (XXG) is not a publisher of original thought. Any contributions you make to Knowledge (XXG) must be
239:
for your contributions. If you attempt to publish "scoops" on Knowledge (XXG), you may be found in violation of our
274: 228: 200: 114: 212: 162: 177:
Journalists offer firsthand reports of current events. Knowledge (XXG) does not. Knowledge (XXG) is not a
155: 44: 106: 54: 243:
policy, and your "scoop" is likely to be reverted for being unverifiable by other editors and admins.
129: 105:
Knowledge (XXG) does none of these things. Knowledge (XXG) is an online encyclopedia, written from a
75: 166: 32: 138: 277:
An essay with somewhat similar views to this one, which was a rejected notability guideline.
248: 193: 178: 94: 284: 47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 99: 264: 122: 93:
or online news site. Most newspapers are journals of current news, reporting
90: 260: 189:
Knowledge (XXG) does not disseminate the opinion of those who write it
231:, meaning anyone can check the facts for themselves, and based on 74: 196:. It is not a forum for you to spout your opinion to the world. 169:. If it is the latter, there may be no need to write about it. 18: 62: 128:a Wikimedia project dedicated to writing news. Its 132:describes key concepts the project is governed by. 146:Knowledge (XXG) is not a journal of current news 141:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by expanding it. 137:Note to all experienced users: This essay is a 8: 199:Knowledge (XXG) articles are supposed to be 219:Knowledge (XXG) does not expose the truth 41:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 7: 183:Knowledge (XXG):No original research 45:thoroughly vetted by the community 14: 194:Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox 82:isn't getting it from the rack. 22: 16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 173:Wikipedians are not journalists 80:But seriously, Knowledge (XXG) 1: 275:Knowledge (XXG):News articles 271:intended to be a news site. 307: 213:Knowledge (XXG):User pages 52: 156:Knowledge (XXG):Recentism 211:of an encyclopedia. See 291:Knowledge (XXG) essays 87:Knowledge (XXG) is not 83: 205:neutral point of view 107:neutral point of view 78: 43:, as it has not been 241:no original research 235:. We expect you to 203:and written from a 84: 237:cite your sources 130:mission statement 73: 72: 298: 233:reliable sources 111:reliable sources 81: 65: 26: 25: 19: 306: 305: 301: 300: 299: 297: 296: 295: 281: 280: 257: 221: 191: 175: 148: 79: 69: 68: 61: 57: 49: 48: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 304: 302: 294: 293: 283: 282: 279: 278: 272: 256: 253: 220: 217: 190: 187: 179:primary source 174: 171: 147: 144: 95:current events 71: 70: 67: 66: 58: 53: 50: 38: 37: 29: 27: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 303: 292: 289: 288: 286: 276: 273: 270: 266: 262: 259: 258: 254: 252: 250: 244: 242: 238: 234: 230: 225: 218: 216: 214: 208: 206: 202: 197: 195: 188: 186: 184: 180: 172: 170: 168: 164: 159: 157: 151: 145: 143: 142: 140: 134: 133: 131: 125: 124: 118: 116: 112: 109:and based on 108: 103: 101: 96: 92: 88: 77: 64: 60: 59: 56: 51: 46: 42: 36: 34: 28: 21: 20: 268: 245: 226: 222: 209: 198: 192: 176: 160: 152: 149: 136: 135: 127: 120: 119: 104: 85: 30: 115:objectivity 102:in nature. 31:This is an 229:verifiable 201:verifiable 165:, or mere 100:subjective 267:), which 265:main page 163:important 91:newspaper 285:Category 261:Wikinews 255:See also 123:Wikinews 63:WP:NOTNP 55:Shortcut 224:right? 249:WP:NOR 181:. See 167:trivia 121:Note: 33:essay 139:stub 113:and 287:: 269:is 251:. 215:. 185:. 158:. 126:is 117:. 89:a 263:( 35:.

Index

essay
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcut
WP:NOTNP
Newspaper rack
Knowledge (XXG) is not
newspaper
current events
subjective
neutral point of view
reliable sources
objectivity
Wikinews
mission statement
stub
Knowledge (XXG):Recentism
important
trivia
primary source
Knowledge (XXG):No original research
Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox
verifiable
neutral point of view
Knowledge (XXG):User pages
verifiable
reliable sources
cite your sources
no original research
WP:NOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.