4121:
this, new users were presented with a gaping hole because the content I added is the heart of the set of minimal information to provide people if we're describing our "content inclusion" policies in an introduction and overview, as the page functions and should function as the first page they meet. I did it, I think, in an extremely parsimonious manner (purposefully so), mindful of the same concern you are expressing here. The page actually was deceptive in implying that our content inclusion guidelines are limited to and called "notability" (which is the subject of the next page, not this one). This wizard is set to function as a person's first contact with what articles are required to include (and not include), and I can't see how we can do that properly without at least mentioning our core content inclusion policies, again, done here in a minimalistic fashion. Two more things: human nature being what it is, many people will more thoroughly read, and click through to the links provided, on the first content page of the wizard than the second page, and more of the second page than the third, and so on down the line. Getting the core out there on the overview page at least gets people to look at the heart of what we're about before being funneled into other matters about process. Second and relatedly, in later pages of the wizard there are numerous other guidelines and policies linked and we, as experienced users, know which are the core and which are lower echelon explanation pages and subsets of those core policies. New users haven't a clue. This is the only way we start them on understanding a hierarchy because all or most of those later policies/essays/guidelines/process pages flow out of and relate to the wellspring these policy pages represent.--
4020:), sources (many of our Hawaii articles use a limited set of sources, and we have resource pages that could be used to lookup pre-formatted references to add them to the page) and content (we could recommend creating a DYK and provide a wizard for that process as well, and have a "proofreader" script check information for accuracy and compliance). Depending on what Hawaii subtopic the user is writing about, we could recommend contacting a specific user on the project for review or questions. For example, if someone not too familiar with Maui was creating a stub, it would be nice for my name to come up as a contact person for questions or help if they needed it, etc. The members of WikiProject Hawaii have specific skill sets and interests, and users should be able to tap into it for help. If a project wanted to use the article wizard in their project, they would simply maintain a file with the appropriate parameters, and the wizard would use that file to populate the fields for that project. That way, any project could use the wizard customized for their project/topic. Eventually, with enough connections, you could turn this into an
3811:
move, and a brand-new editor cannot move for four days. Yes, I know others can do it for you, but I've seen dozens of examples of new editors asking about the move button, then having to get someone else to do it for them. I think I understand that the four day limit is because a move can create some problems, and we don't want day one editors trying to move pages around. If I were to go to
Village Pump and propose that newly registered users could see the move button on day one ONLY on user subpages, so they could create an article and move it when ready, would that be a stupid idea? Other than the technical issues involved, are there bad things that could happen if a user had the ability to move an article into main space on day 2? It isn't the main space issue, as we will let them create a new page in main space on day one, but are there any down sides to allowing moves only from user space to main space (but not allowing moves from main space to main space on day one?--
622:
small. If user feedback tells us that six seems like too many, we should consider tweaking, but Iāll be surprised if the typical user thinks six is too many. Itās fewer steps than it takes to describe removing money from an ATM, and many people manage to do that. If it makes it appear smaller, perhaps following your step canonization, perhaps it could be steps 1,2,3a,3b,3c, and 4, Leaving the user with the impression that it is a four step process, with one step having a couple subcomponents. Iām happy with 1-6. Having spent some time watching people struggle with new articles, I think theyāll find this a breath of fresh air. They typically get a few of the steps, but invariably miss some, and while the steps are all in the instructions, thereās a lot in the instructions ā if you tell them they need to walk through six steps, I bet the general reaction would be positive.
4053:
band, but I think you should also make an effort to attract users who are experts in their fields but lack the technical knowledge to create articles. Right now, the user is presented with choices for creating articles about companies, biographies, websites, phrases, and music, but that is really the lowest common denominator. In my experience, there are many experts who would love to contribute to topics in history, science, math, and art, but lack the skills to do so, and I think this tool could help them, which is why there should be a way for WikiProjects to provide wizards for their subject area that would link into the primary tool.
447:
on what's likely their first article, and possibly their first edit. The more difficult something is, the more likely people are to just skip it. A plain list of URLs is better than nothing. While it may be easier for the people making the wizard, I think it might be more useful for new editors if there was a different preload for each article type. With AFC we have the luxury of an experienced editor reviewing the article who can make it look passable before moving it to mainspace, for people creating articles directly we don't have this luxury.
3601:, I don't see that as a food reason to change the direct. While I expect that the Wizard will be sued by new contributors, it is very possible it will be used by established ones as well, maybe existing established ones, or new ones who become established and continue to use it. While a minor point, they might still want feedback, but are no longer new contributors. Plus, both Help and NC Help are more for specific questions, while Feed is more for generic feedback. So Feed is the right place, we just have to figure out how to staff it correctly.
31:
1893:
1609:āTest run: yes, I see how it works now. I don't know if you need to change the way it works. I think a note after "This wizard will help you through the process of submitting a new article to Knowledge." saying "Additional tabs will be enabled as you complete the wizard" would probably do the trick, if that doesn't create confusion of its own.Ā :) I'm glad to see copyright covered, since that's the drum I bang, but I think that
3577:
for new contributors. The question is perhaps more about the additional cost imposed on new page patrollers - what proportion of pages are simply marked "patrolled" without editing (once editing, removing the template is very little cost, and if adding a cleanup tag it actually saves typing the curly brackets)? And what proportion of those patrolled-without-editing pages should actually be tagged for cleanup in some way?
4590:: "I have noticed that there has been a large increase in G11s since the New Article Wizard came into use; I'm guessing that previously people didn't understand how to write an article at all, and so they got deleted under other criteria, but with the NAW they're now writing articles that are flagrantly promotional, but otherwise hit the guidelines." This suggests an area we can try and improve - suggestions welcome.
443:
followed by "It is always better to write the article yourself." Its generally simpler to just assume that 99.9% of websites are not public domain or under a free license (and most of the ones that are freely licensed are still not suitable for a direct copy-and-paste) and to just tell people to not copy things at all rather than trying to explain free licenses and copyright infringement.
1749:: The active tab is either one pixel too high and shows a small border at the bottom, or one pixel too low with extremely big font sizes. All other browsers I just checked display it like my vector skin does. Both look acceptable I think, it's really a hack though, I merely tweaked two style values until it happened to look like what I was going for (my monobook version).Ā :)
4672:. Referencing BLP policy is exactly the sort of thing which adds massive complexity (if the newbies start reading it) with little conrete applicability, because it's mostly either a general sense that existing policies are applied more strictly (and nobody really knows what that means), or quite specific things not likely to be relevant at this stage.
646:"Don't copy from another source" than it is to spend a whole paragraph discussing the GFDL and making vague statements like "Even if you wrote it, it may infringe copyright." Changing the numbering of the steps won't matter (TBH, I didn't even notice they were numbered until just now), what matters is the number of clicks it takes to get from A -: -->
1773:
1913:
3525:. Even before this template was made, there were requests that were posted that went unanswered and are now in the archives. In the past two days there have been probably a dozen requests, where normally there might be 1 a day. I understand you'd like to see somebody review the articles that these people are creating, but that's sort of what
4822:- if you'd like to do that. PS I've thought about how to get the article title prepopulated from a link like that to the edit box at the end of the Wizard - and I believe this is currently impossible using wikitext alone (Javascript might well be able to do it, or we could ask for a software tweak, but that's another ballgame).
830:
article into main space until they are auto-confirmed (or get help) but Iād prefer to address that by making the move button work for new users ONLY to move from personal subpage to main space. I can elaborate on why I think times have changed if someone disagrees with the notion that creation in a user subpage is a bad idea.--
1622:? We can add a wizard to that page giving instructions on how to question. I think perhaps between "attributed and source quotation." and "Articles violating copyright..." you might want to add something like, "If you own the previously published material or have permission to reproduce it, permission must be verified. See
608:
fewer steps makes each step harder and probably more confusing; there's a trade-off. If merging could be done in a way that really reduced redundancy, sure - but I don't see much potential for that. Compare, for instance, the two step
Article wizard: the first page is very simple, the second gives you something like this:
439:
the more likely they are to start skimming over things or skipping it altogether. This even seems to have a bit of redundancy. Using the "website" wizard as an example, it asks in detail about notability in the notability section, then proceeds in the "content" section to discuss the same issues in less detail.
4267:
You could make an edit filter that flags those sorts of edits, where a page is created with example.com in it. The filter could still allow the edit, while giving a place where more experienced
Wikipedians can see which articles have it, and they can fix it. I'm not too savvy on how those filters are
2686:
3 and 5 I've tweaked the edit instructions a bit - good enough now perhaps. I've also added an
External Links section to the preload template; I wasn't sure whether to do it before; but I guess articles that don't need it where the editor doesn't delete it, someone else will. Perhaps one for the user
1556:
None of the tabs are enabled for me from the main screen. I've never gone through the Wizard, so I have no clue how it works. (Maybe I should give it a test run.) If the tabs, subject through end, are supposed to come available as you go, perhaps it would be helpful to just leave a note indicating as
1456:, "My proposed article meets some of the criteria above", seems misplaced there: It leads to a page talking about advertising which doesn't really follow from the caption of the button, and it's unclear when to use it with "My proposed article does not meet all the criteria above" directly beneath it.
4773:
I'm not sure that merging would be a good idea in general - I think it's important to keep a balance between few steps, but each step understandable and clear, and that seems about right to me now. Additionally, there are five
Notability pages at present, with substantial differences - merging these
442:
The "website" wizard seems to borrow heavily from the company one, even calling it a company a couple times. "Even if you wrote it, it may infringe copyright." - This is true, but only in very rare situations (where you wrote it and gave the copyright to someone else). Its confusing, especially when
309:
I really like it. It works really well. Nice job! I may have something about them searching & making sure the article doesn't already exist under another name/spelling. Also, I'd maybe add another tab that says "Create" for the actual creation (or change "End" to "Create"). It just seems sort of
4618:
style box around the two options (not including the tmbox icon though, obviously). Also, in reducing the window width, the page breaks somewhere between 1024x768 and 800x600 resolutions (due to the fixed width of the input boxes). I think this is OK, it's still usable at 800x600, and we can't worry
4180:
Well I've removed it from the
Subject page where it clearly doesn't belong, but I really can't see where it needs to be included. WP:NOT is too unfriendly to newbies; don't want to direct them there (and judging by the Wizard output, it's not really needed). Verifiability is already linked from the
4120:
Yes, pages have a tendency to sprawl sometimes and start including more and more side notes but if this page was a meal, we forgot to serve the main dish. In other words, being vigilant to keep this as simple as possible but include the bare necessities is a valid concern but without something like
3875:
I was thinking that as well. The problem I run into sometimes is some of our new editors try to distinguish between "idea" and "object" (probably because of their own involvment with the subject) - i.e. "This article is about an idea I have for a cool game" vs. "This article is about this cool game
1588:
work in a fully tabby way would be to merge the separate
Notability pages into one, by section, so that when people choose a link at Step 2 it's a section link. But that would make the notability page quite long. Plus at Step 2 some of the links don't go to a Notability page - they go to a Don't Do
645:
discussing notability is just backward. There's no need at all to teach newbies about copyright here. As I said, basically 99.99% of the text on the web is non-free, and only maybe 1% of the free stuff is actually usable as a direct copy and paste into an article. Its far easier to just tell people
450:
One question: Who is the target audience for this wizard? As far as I can tell, it seems to be "clueless new users with a long attention span." Remember that AFC is designed for people who either don't want to or don't know how to register an account. People using this will already have an account,
446:
The preload template and editintro also have some issues. The editintro hasn't been modified from the AFC version so it doesn't really make any sense at all. The preload asks people to read a style guideline just be able to cite sources; there's no reason to be picky and tell people to use ref tags
4110:
better hidden, to focus on the notability issue which that
Subject step is about. I'm a bit wary of the natural tendency for Knowledge pages to complexify and grow over time - this will gradually reduce the Wizard's usability if we're not vigilant. Anyone else have views on this particular change?
3830:
The move restriction could be weakened, to allow users to move pages out of their userspace into mainspace. That would be helpful, I think - why not propose it? As for making it the only option in the wizard - I don't think that's a good idea; but I'll try a sandbox version of making the userspace
3576:
pages made through it). And a template is a better way of adding/to removing from the category than just adding the category directly, as was the situation initially. In the longer term, the duplication of NPP arises, but I could still see advantages to having such a template, both for readers and
497:
Audience: I suppose a large part of the motivation is (a) hand-holding new users who really want to contribute and have something to contribute (b) putting off new users from creating articles that would just get speedied (c) helping new users find out what's needed to create a new article, rather
476:
I'm sure the text can be improved - I haven't really tried to do so; less "legalese". Certainly the points you make about the website wizard are fair; though I suppose some people might click "it may be considered advertising" if that is indeed their purpose and they want to know more about how to
438:
Additionally, there's too many steps. This was also a conscious decision when making the first article wizard. I can't find any of the discussion about it, it was probably on IRC. Basically, the more clicks one has to make, the more hoops one has to jump through, and the more text one has to read,
431:
One of the things that I specifically tried to avoid with the
Article wizard was to avoid sounding patronizing. And that's one thing that I've never liked about the AFC wizard. Particularly things like "My proposed article could be considered advertising" - who on earth is actually going to choose
4793:
at the bottom of the page is an invitation to create the article. This really ought to link to the Wizard with the article title pre-populated, to cut down on the number of new articles that are being created without knowledge of the policies (which the Wizard at least tries to make a new editor
4227:
Well it's a case of "you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't". When there was no
External Links section, there were too many people squishing external links whereever, usually mixing them up with References. I think this is a little better now - and "example.com" is a lesser problem I
4052:
No, it's ok. I think the best way to address my point is to expand the "What is your proposed article about?" section. You've got a really limited set of topics listed there. Granted, you're trying to appeal to a very limited user subset, one who wants to write about their business or favorite
4015:
for project-specific article creation, such that the subject, notability, sources, and content parameters can include entries that are populated by a file in WikiProject space. This would allow our new and technically-challenged editors to work with prompts, such as stub tags (Hawaii politician,
1379:
be used to bar unreferenced, poorly referenced under-stubs (remember that upload of German MPs). The more I look at the stack of yellow cards the more I like it. It's like taking an oath at the court of law (of the Spanish Inquisition, naturlich). Some will take it lightly, but the perjurors will
621:
Using Einstein's razor (Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler), I donāt see a problem. Perhaps thatās from my perspective ā building a system to rate reinsurance treaties ā we have hundreds of steps, and we are exactly designing a rocket. Relative to that six seems quite
607:
Step 2 can be linked to directly if required, depending on the context. Merging steps 3-5 risks overloading the reader with a mass of different problems they have to overcome; breaking the problems down makes it easier to say "yes, it's fine". It's all very well to say there's too many steps, but
4185:
is clearly covered on the Sources page, and I'm reluctant to introduce the terminology and link there, because it will (a) complicate things and (b) weaken the force of the "Thou Shalt Source" point. Also, again, judging by the Wizard output, it's not that big of an issue. I've expanded the NPOV
3810:
I'd like to see much more encouragement to place the article in user space first. In fact, I'm leaning toward saying it ought to be the only option, but there's one technical nitāif it goes into user space, and the editor gets it to the point it is ready, the way to move it to article space is a
1527:
The tabs work, but only going backwards. Going forwards through the wizard, people have to click links in the body. This is the design of the AFC wizard, which has been around a long time, so it didn't occur to me to worry about that. Perhaps greying the names of the unreachable tabs would help?
4109:
is entirely a good idea. NPOV is something that comes later (and isn't all that important at the creation stage, really, for the level of competence of users we're aiming at), and Verifiability and OR are basically variations on the theme of the Sources page. I think this is complexity which is
4072:
We have a suggestion here to expand the way the wizard works to allow it to be adapted much more specifically to different topics. I'm not sure about how to do that without complicating things and/or lots of work. I do like the idea of pointing people to wikiprojects for feedback/follow up, in
3293:
OK, I've thought about that. I don't think we should take away the option to make new articles live, but we could direct users more strongly to the userspace draft option. In conjunction with that we should also improve the "after care" - clearer directions on what to do once they've created a
829:
I think it is a disservice to drop someone into a live article, even with the excellent help. There may have been a time when this was good advice, but I think that time has passed. Iād prefer to see the default be a creation of a subpage in the user. I realize this means they cannot move the
4363:
I didn't go as far as the HTML - I just opened an "edit this page" window and did a search for "example." It may appear on a related/transcluded documentation page, but it doesn't appear on the page itself. The basic point is that the LinkSearch page is pretty much useless for identifying and
2880:
Well people often ignore editnotices, and the people rushing enough not to change the name in the box before submitting are more likely than most to do so... How about making it a page that explains what they've done wrong, and leaving it protected? I know technically it's in mainspace so we
4038:
That sounds pretty tricky to implement (especially given the limitations of the MediaWiki software - its not designed for this sort of thing), and I'm not entirely convinced it would be worth the effort to standardise that much. I can see contacting specific users (or at least pointing to
3672:
is blank and so is the /doc page? Why did I need to do a "what links here" search on the template and then look at 3 or 4 pages to find this discussion page? Come on, get your documentation in place before you release something like this. Not everyone knows about these parts/projects and
1670:, though I can only get it to work within the button (tried to use a wikitable to align outside the button, but it just breaks). About the tabs, well they do look substantially different from the Introduction ones... I've aAdded your clarifying remarks as well, with a bit extra of my own.
484:
I'm not sure whether there are too many steps; I make it 7 clicks to get to the editing template. Possibly Sources could be merged with Content, but that would lead to a loss of clarity. More drastically, a fairly radical revision could merge steps 3-5 (or even 3-6) onto a single page.
4798:
which identifies that a lot of new articles are being tagged. I believe less tagging of new articles would happen if this avenue for article creation went through the Wizard, so new editors were less likely to be ignorant of policies. BTW, how does one find the Wizard at the moment?
1797:
Well I wasn't, because you'd end up with 2-7 green arrows, which I think would visually overwhelm the page, and perhaps encourage people too much to click without reading. It works on the first page because there's only one choice within the wizard (the other links exit the wizard).
4039:
wikiprojects for certain topics) being useful though, and that can be tacked on relatively easily, in the form of a post-creation step where users choose their topic to get specific help/contact pages (including stub notice links etc perhaps). Do you want to move this discussion to
3223:
Slight not-so-coolness: semi-protected pages give an unfriendly "semi-protected" message. Which incidentally is a bit confusing for newly registered users, it says in top in big bold letters "established registered users" can edit, but only the registered users part is wikilinked.
3324:
I don't know how new of project this is, but how many editors have used this page to actually create an article? Of those editors who have used this page how many editors contributions have been speedied or deleted? Is there anyway to measure such numbers (maybe I should ask at
728:
If you pick a person, the article suggests "Nora Smith" as an example. Fine, but it also suggests "Nora Smith" is you start with Company. Consider changing "Nora Smith" to "XYZ Company" (Looks like you use the same last page for all options - it could be customized without much
571:
Step 1 might be unnecessary as the page that links to the article wizard will likely link to the same resources. Steps 3, 4, and 5 basically ask variants of the same question, especially since notability is typically tied to sources (and explaining what a reliable source is
858:
On the other points - yes, sure (and you're right I just nabbed the AFC screenshot, partly because doing a new one should be left til the template(s) are finalised). PS This Wizard is officially a collaborative enterprise, so people, feel free to fix as well as comment!Ā :)
216:
We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed to establish both the verifiability of the submission as well as its
2697:
Regarding #2 (order of notability and sources) ā I like the current order. Iād hate to have someone do the effort to dredge up sources, then find that the subject isnāt notable. (obviously, the reverse can happen, but IMO, it is slightly less likely.) This path is less
1035:
As far as I know, that only works on special pages and other interface messages like those that are shown when using action=edit. Anything that changed the page display for each page load on normal pages would break caching and would never be used on Wikimedia sites.
848:
I think that's a great idea. At minimum the end page can present it as an option and explain why it's a good idea. And they may not be able to move the article to main space, but they can copy-paste the wikitext, which (with a single author, as here) is probably OK.
225:
There is doubt that this submission meets our guidelines for inclusion. To be considered notable enough to merit an article a topic should have received nontrivial coverage in multiple independent sources. Suggestions for such sources should alleviate doubts about
640:
If we want to go into detail about things, that's fine, but we should go into detail about things that matter. Basically, 3 of the steps discuss reliable sources. Sourcing is important, but that's just redundancy. And introducing the concept of a reliable source
1136:
name, not mine (initially when I came to this page - in the preview it's now my username). So I think Special:Mypage is the way to go, unless there's a problem with that. (I'm slightly confused though - I thought REVISIONUSER was used in quite a few templates?)
202:
As it stands you would want to use one of the more specific comments when arguing from A7, ie. web/corp/band, and source when arguing for lack of notability. However source is not that appropriate when the article is sourced, but solely from primary sources.
3699:
I see that you've changed up the template a little bit. I like this better than how it was. FEED certainly has been getting a lot of requests still, but it appears that helpers (maybe from the help desk?) have been responding very quickly. I'm liking it.Ā :-)
1644:, with the addition of some instructions, sure; it was the best place I could find. I'm not convinced about referring explicitly to the tabs, I think that might confuse more people than it helps. A big arrow icon would be better - you don't have one do you?
1613:
is not a good forum to send people to ask questions. Typically, listings are not viewed by anybody for a week and a day after they are made, which could be pretty frustrating for people. Sadly, we don't have a general copyright forum like we do for media at
2775:, as some more experienced users who don't want to walk through the steps might find the preload template useful. And I figure the less experienced users won't notice the shortcut, and therefore won't use it to skip steps they shouldn't. Anyone disagree?
3059:, as some more experienced users who don't want to walk through the steps might find the preload template useful. And I figure the less experienced users won't notice the shortcut, and therefore won't use it to skip steps they shouldn't. Anyone disagree?
3139:
What about changing "You will be taken to an edit page where you can enter your article and sources" to something like, "If there is not already an article there, you will be taken to an edit page where you can enter your article and sources. If there
1307:
The first page needs a little work. It literally implies that registered user may want to learn more about editing or creating articles, but unregistered would not. Thatās obviously not what we mean. Iām toying with some alternatives, but none are yet
4813:
a couple of days later. I think it bears more discussion on how to reference the Wizard on the Search page - I originally thought this would be quite important, and maybe it is. It is linked from the message shown when people are starting an article
1854:- well of course you can wave TLDR at a TLA ...Ā :) the question is what can be done to improve the balance between giving too much info and too little, or otherwise finding ways to improve the tradeoff (presenting info better). Suggestions welcome.
1830:. You may be right that it might encourage people to just read the buttons if it's obvious where to continue, but on the other hand, if they are inclined to do that, they are probably going to either way. The wizard is already in danger of being
1238:
That was wording copied from the original AfC wizard. There are now hidden categories in the templates which can be used for additional reviewing, beyond the New Page Patrol. I've created a new category which can be removed by such reviewers:
3865:, currently linked as "I'm writing about a NEW PHRASE/WORD". It could become "I'm writing about a NEW PHRASE/WORD/IDEA" or perhaps "I'm writing about a NEW THING I'VE HEARD OR CREATED". The target page would need re-writing accordingly.
381:
Regardless of the circumstance, however, I still don't see why there is no space. When there is another version, there is normally a space (such as AOL 4.0, etc). I think when people type in the name, they'll expect the page to be at
4351:
for example transcludes its documentation page which is displaying an exemplary infobox with the link. Links are counted on all pages where the external link is rendered as an active link, not where it appears in the page wikitext.
1546:
Actually having thought about it, that problem does only affect the Notability tab (I think), and for that the tab could link to General notability. Would that be helpful though? Do we want users to be able to jump ahead like that?
1696:
I'd think that either graying out the upcoming tabs, or hiding them completely, would be best. I too wanted to click on a tab right away when I went to the Wizard for the first time, i.e. before clicking through it for the first
4417:
But given there is no namespace filtering, one would have to slog through thousands of results that are there and hope one doesn't miss the mainspace entries as one's eyes glaze over. Not unlike the Recent Changes page. :D
4818:), but by then it may already be too late - once presented with the editbox, I don't know that people pay much attention to the Noarticletext editnotice. Perhaps this should be specifically proposed to a wider audience at
1212:. I'd like to get a decent agreed draft of the wizard live sooner rather than later, and then develop it further based on user feedback. Does that sound reasonable? What will we need for a decent enough draft to put live?
4736:
template is less helpful than it might be, because it doesn't know what the user's looking for. Is there a way to use a search box and/or some Javascript so that the template can be loaded with the right search term?
3770:
New users are exactly the audience for the Wizard. How we can improve it to reduce this issue? Perhaps we should try harder to direct users to userspace drafts? At present the "live option" is presented first (at
1528:
Making the tabs fully functional forwards and backwards would entail a substantial re-design, because for instance what's shown on the Notability tab (Step 3) depends on which type of article is chosen at Step 2.
513:
I didn't think the number of steps was too large. Only Six, you can click through without reading the (helpful) intro, and what I really like, is you can back up if you realize you ought to read the material you
3753:) created out of this wizard then useful new articles. Of course, I generally patrol edits by new users, who may not be the best audience for the Wizard, but in general, I think it's doing more harm than good.
4774:
is not a trivial task and I don't think the result will be an improvement. That said, things that don't sound good when described may seem better when presented in draft form, if you want to have a go. cheers,
432:
that? Someone who's trying to spam is just going to ignore it and someone who isn't is just going to believe that their article isn't advertising, because they aren't familiar with Knowledge's concept of NPOV.
3270:
You can also start your new article at Special:MyPage/Shgfsahdgiuoh. You can develop the article, with less risk of deletion, ask other editors to help work on it, and move it into "article space" when it is
776:
The screen shot shows a section heading for "Sources" but the live edit box has "References" not sources. You don't want the user entering sources under references (one of the more confusing things for new
4693:
leads me to say that we should explore talking to WikiProjects about creating specific Guides for Newbies for their topics. These will be helpful in all sorts of ways, linked within the Wizard and from
3144:
already an article there, and it is not about your subject, you may need to "disambiguate" the title by adding a description in parentheses after the name. For example, "Nora Smith (author)"" A link to
4754:
Suggestion: Merge the "subject", "notability" and "content" tabs and simplify them a bit. Include a list of places to find good sources in the sources tab (Google scholar, Google news etc) and link to
1064:
Because you can't cache a page that's rendered differently for every user (and I don't see where it uses ambox). It'll work fine transcluded, but the only way to do it would be to use Special:Mypage.
3259:
Allowing editors sometime to work out the problems before the article goes live, will help retain new editors, and lower the amount of work that editors have to do in Speedy deletions and in AfDs.
2446:
1653:
I've pointed it to talk. I'll add instructions there; we've needed some anyway. I haven't got any arrows, big or little.Ā :) My confusion with the tabs is that I was expecting it to function like
4073:
addition to WP:FEED; maybe we can link this with the new user-subpage-draft guide being created above. It could be an extra page mentioned in the edit instructions, as a sort of What Next page.
1834:, I'm afraid. To me, the list of buttons isn't particularly appealing, and I'd rather change it somehow. I like the arrows, or we might be able to style nicer buttons with some site-wide css in
1398:
that any violation of the oaths is at least... 24... too long... 12-month block. Which can be shortcut and redeemed by editing the article in userspace to <joke ends here, lets get real: -->
4637:
4255:
3720:
520:
References are hard. Perhaps it is good advice to tell them to start by dropping in urls, but that adds to my point below that the first creation should be in user space, not article space.--
4082:
Actually one thing I'm seeing is a need perhaps to help people make redirects - that's currently not covered and you see people creating redirects with the whole preload template in there.
2199:
2146:
4505:
Hmm. It's a configuration issue, controlled by $ wgExemptFromUserRobotsControl, which defaults to $ wgContentNamespaces, which is set to main space on almost all WikiMedia projects ā see
1566:
Ah, OK. The "Subject" tab could actually be enabled from the intro screen. But that would encourage people to navigate using the tabs, which certainly at Step 2 (Subject) they shouldn't.
4605:
1421:
Some point emerges from that, but with great difficulty. What, if anything, are you suggesting we should do with the wizard, either to improve it or in terms of how Knowledge uses it?
3056:
2772:
1921:
1209:
3129:
when the "New Article" clashes with an existing one (particularly the case for common person names, perhaps). How can we deal with that? We need to adjust the guidance, at minimum.
2623:, now commented out, was borrowed from the original AFC wizard and is perhaps more confusing than helpful now) - but the image can only be done once the template has been finalised.
277:
This is the English-language Knowledge; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide an English-language translation for your article, or visit the
3941:
1465:
1453:
1298:
Good points - done. (Apart from switching from "Which kind of user are you?" to "What would you like to do first?" - I don't think that works given the Registered/Nonreg split).
478:
3584:
or even to a completely place would be better. I don't have a strong opinion on that, as long as the template sends people somewhere where they can get an appropriate response.
2612:
Is it worth doing different templates for different article types? Is it worth doing before putting it live? Either way, which article types, and how would the templates differ?
4708:. Does anyone know if any projects already have such a thing? If not, does anyone want to create an outline template or guidance for wikiprojects to draw on in creating these?
3846:
I'm wondering about adding a new category to Step 2: "Something I invented or created". We see a lot of this with new pages (new drinking game, new drink, new software, etc.).
1990:
Ah I get it now you've explained. NB not that it matters but the alignment on the lower arrow's not quite right. Arrow size seems good - the user's earned a big arrow by then!
1935:
Thanks, good stuff, and you're right about the last page. But how to make the green arrow align with anything is a mystery to me: eg the wikitable doesn't work in the wizard.
1513:, it seems it might be confusing if it is not fully functional. If it isn't just firefox and those tabs actually are not yet complete, perhaps it would be better to have what
1132:
I was looking at (ambox); and in your comment you said "You should see your name here: Gadget850." As you can see from my copy-paste, REVISIONUSER (in the wikitext) showed me
494:
Reviewing: I've created a category which the preload includes, and the idea is that the category provides a way for more experienced editors to review Wizard-created articles.
3645:
2935:
2893:
1458:
It's also weird that the "good" answer is "My proposed article meets all the criteria above" when actually only one criterion has to be passed (they are all marked with bold
3876:(I happened to invent yesterday)". Maybe "I'm writing about a NEW PHRASE, WORD, IDEA, INVENTION, OR CREATION", with the necessary expansion of the subsequent explanation?
2102:
1827:
1700:
1100:
I still don't understand the problem with {{REVISIONUSER}}, especially since this trick is used elsewhere, such as my talk page editnotice. You should see your name here:
4723:
1388:
new submissions (hey, even a redir must be referenced), whether it's from today's newbie or from Mr. Wales. This automatically bans bot submissions (bots can't swear).
3993:
thanks for the comments! I'm not entirely sure what you mean by tailoring it for WikiProject Hawaii though. What do you have in mind? There has been some discussion (
2853:
has now been salted, since it was already created once (by an established editor, weirdly enough). However, I'm wondering whether it shouldn't be unprotected with an
3668:
Having seen it on some new articles from the Alexbot new article search, I went looking for info on it. I think it's disappointing that it has it been deployed, but
1326:
Well I see what you mean, but the two unregistered options are to go and register and to use the AFC wizard. Maybe clarifying the latter option would be sufficient.
2081:
2026:
1640:. Not entirely convinced, but I think it's important not to overload the average user with points only relevant to a few. If you think it'll be better to point to
3421:
I'd suggest leaving "how to create" out of it - this is covered elsewhere (can link to it) and the target audience (for me) is people who've already created one.
435:
Though on the other hand, it seems to just copy and paste some things directly from guidelines and policies, rather than trying to explain them in non-legalese.
3924:
3862:
1430:
So far wikipedia does not use it; once it's on, time will tell. But I see no significant benefit unless patrolling elevates to draconian levels outlined above.
2896:, then it should stop most people I think, and if enough admins keep this page on their watchlist (like I preemptively did) to react to the ones who don't ...
4147:
of the proposed article's subject, and the sourcing needed to demonstrate that notability). Everything else is secondary from the point of view of the user;
3580:
Secondly, if FEED is undermanned and can't handle the new traffic, my inclination would be to try harder to get more people involved. But maybe directing to
2450:
548:"Only" six. We're writing an article, not installing an operating system. The more steps there are, the more complicated it seems. Basically the steps are:
4164:
2666:
How/where will the wizard be promoted once finished? Welcome templates and various parts of the MediaWiki interface (eg search results) seem a good start.
3997:) about adopting templates for different types of article (eg companies) but I'm not sure how adopting for a topic would look. I suggest raising this at
3465:
3404:
3107:
2679:
2551:
2421:
1823:
1637:
4436:. There you've got to slog through speedy deleted entries not yet eliminated from Google though. Which leads me to the suggestion that we could include
1732:
Can you grey the text a bit too? I think people are slightly more used to greyed-out text being a cue for "can't go there" than just a grey background.
4206:
2913:...Ā :) But OK, if you can make an edit notice that dramatic, go for it... You could also ask Help Desk regulars to watchlist it, and see how it goes.
4795:
1623:
1205:
1187:
3038:
system; should this be dropped as confusing for newbies, or supplemented with a Sources section ("use whichever you're comfortable with", perhaps?)
2609:
system; should this be dropped as confusing for newbies, or supplemented with a Sources section ("use whichever you're comfortable with", perhaps?)
4705:
3386:
3310:
3295:
3071:
2789:
79:
71:
66:
498:
than being confronted with a blank page and a vague idea that they're trying to write something encyclopedic on this topic they're interested in.
3594:
3581:
3552:
3644:
I actually already had the idea of creating an intermediate page, rather than linking straight to WP:FEED. A first stab at it looks like this:
3204:
3167:
3163:
1369:
780:
The screenshot shows a warning in the box that is actually outside the box - not a big deal, just more evidence the screen shot should be fixed
3568:
has been and continues to be useful in developing and improving the Wizard, to track new pages made through it (as distinct from the category
3371:
3159:
3063:
2785:
2616:
1762:
Looks good enough to me - could be marginally prettier, but I wouldn't worry about the odd pixel... Do you want to go ahead and implement it?
4155:
are specific policies on the idea of Thou Shalt Source, which we don't need to present at this point (Step 2), because the wizard is not the
1880:
OK, green arrows it is. Don't forget to update the image links, if you haven't done already (so clicking the arrow goes to the right place).
4001:; you could copy an existing part of the wizard (see the documentation link at the top of that talk page) to a sandbox if it helps. cheers,
3256:
On average 67% of all new articles which are put up for deletion are by new editors, and this is not including the speedy deleted articles.
963:. I suspect this has something to do with auto-preview being enabled in my prefs, but I'm not clicking the "enter title" button, so wtf? --
4171:
or not, are secondary in the wizard's purpose. So I'm still inclined, when I have the time, to migrate these things from Step 2 to Step 5.
3928:
3728:
1186:
Anyway, it currently uses Special:Mypage, and I've dropped in a substed version of UserWorkInProgress, using the SUBPAGENAME variable. See
4286:. It doesn't allow namespace filtering due to some pretty ancient optimization, manual filtering just lead to the following 134 articles:
1751:
I tweaked the gray values to show the same shades my Firefox does with a disabled button, but feel free to tweak it as you like yourself.
4419:
4365:
4334:
4241:
4213:
3787:
to the Intro page. I'd like to shunt it off to the right-hand side, but it mucks up the button formatting. Can anyone make that happen?
3724:
2417:
2106:
4386:, but most others are wizard pages or accidental insertions via the edit toolbar (the latter should mostly be tagged as test edits via
4378:
It's not perfect, but not useless either, if you limit yourself to the pages in mainspace. You'll get a couple false positives like on
1277:
Then shorten the answers. For example: from "I would like to learn a bit more about editing first" to "Learn a bit more about editing"
3569:
3363:
3095:
2749:
2971:
2861:
4656:
1641:
1619:
156:
3041:
Is it worth doing different preload templates for different article types? Which article types, and how would the templates differ?
1871:
to convey. I think the wizard does a pretty good job of it, though I don't doubt that things can always be done more succinctly. --
1657:. If you think reference to "tabs" may be confusing, what about, "As each section is completed, the next will become available"? --
1557:
much after "This wizard will help you through the process of submitting a new article to Knowledge"? I'll give it a test run.Ā :) --
4456:
template. Good idea? Maybe combined with some kind of date-dependent template or bot so the noindexing is only temporary, in case
4135:
Well, that's a well-argued reply, but you're missing a key point I think: that page (and the entire focus of the wizard) isn't on
4283:
3508:
1723:
Yes, that's good. And it works for me in Windows/Chrome and /IE8. Is it likely enough to cause problems to need lots of testing?
257:
176:
1786:
Are you planning to add the green arrow to all wizard buttons? I'd like that, I think it helps to figure out where to continue.
4348:
4330:
3760:
3346:
The only way I can think of to track this is to preload a hidden category such as Articles created with the Article Wizard. ---
2304:
2085:
976:
945:
146:
1154:
at some system messages (including editnotices) is a somewhat accidental feature, and is going to be removed sooner or later (
1509:
Unless it's just a Firefox thing, the tabs along the top don't work. Since this is now prominently linked from such pages as
743:
If you select website as a subject in step 2, then move on to notability, it asks if the proposed article is about a notable
3543:
OK, so it seems there are two main questions arising. (a) should we have a template like this at all; is it a supplement to
1399:
B-class rating confirmed by a credible reviewer. This, of course, assumes that the topic is acceptable; if not, it's a year.
773:
The top line within the edit box refers to AFC pending and says don't remove this line, but the line is not in the live box.
4254:
I just tried doing that, and I couldn't see how to do it without it being even more confusing to newbies. I've revised the
3648:
which seems good enough to replace the direct FEED link in the template, so I did. Could be much improved though I'm sure.
1979:
I've added the arrow to the last page as well, with rather big arrows ā feel free to tweak as you like, of course. Cheers,
3669:
2554:
I'd like to boxout the good/bad source examples on the right-hand side, to make the page cleaner. Can't see how to do it.
2437:
2429:
2118:
1957:
Heh, yeah, passing tables as template parameters is a huge pain. You have to escape pretty much everything, which is what
960:
283:
47:
17:
3313:
would be a very good link for the userspace template that's preloaded for userspace drafts - if anyone wants to make it.
2910:
882:
869:
273:
199:
A7 really only applies to a narrow scope of subjects, while notability is precisely defined by the existence of sources.
4608:
to give more prominence to the userspace draft option. Unfortunately I couldn't get my table to work right - I wanted a
4024:, and given enough input, the system could write an outline, create an infobox, check against assessment criteria, etc.
4012:
3503:
to make it easier and clearer how to review new articles (in particular by making it easier to remove articles from the
3253:
Can you all change this to redirect to the editors userified page please? I know how to do it if you would like me too.
3067:
3012:
2892:
You're certainly right that editnotices are ignored often enough. If it's made intrusive enough, i.e. even more so than
2649:
2620:
2433:
2294:
2122:
1610:
1510:
1222:" it will be reviewed by one or more registered editors " are you intending anything special, or just new pag patrol?
383:
332:
3657:
That's good and should help. I like the idea of directing them to project pages. Mulling over how to expand that a bit.
3247:
1703:(style hack, looks good in my Firefox with font size of 100%, but will probably display improperly in other browsers).
1391:
Redesign new page patrol to enforce the minimum standard prescribed on the cards. IMO it equates to B-class (at least).
4212:
This should be removed, or at least commented out. Far, far too many new articles are showing up with this as a link.
3565:
3504:
3367:
3099:
3004:
2641:
2324:
1667:
1517:
work here while those tabs are further developed in sandbox? New contributors in particular are easily confused.Ā :) --
1240:
1126:
1091:
1013:
687:
609:
4698:
4460:
4450:
3497:
3077:
Please comment at the relevant MediaWiki interface talk pages, where I've proposed adding a reference to the Wizard:
2890:
I'm afraid that won't be possible in main space. I personally would oppose it, and I can't see it survive an AfD/MfD.
2801:
Please comment at the relevant MediaWiki interface talk pages, where I've proposed adding a reference to the Wizard:
4506:
2938:
is a good compromiseā no garish icons, but a noticeable color and long enough to make the editor scroll past it. ---
166:
2425:
2022:
1375:
The proposed barrage of questions will surely piss off editors (hey, who cares about them anymore) but it actually
38:
1575:
I had considered a nice big arrow icon pointing at Create Article Now, but I couldn't find one and then forgot...
4126:
2374:
2284:
1714:
I think that's also good. I think the point here is to make things as clear and simple for people as possible. --
1288:
3407:
I will ask some other editors to help, they are better and writing policy. I welcome any help you can provide.
4546:
3472:
3263:
3229:
3146:
3086:
3016:
3008:
2810:
2653:
2645:
2634:
2630:
2520:
2485:
2413:
2140:
2132:
2110:
356:
1537:
Ah, maybe graying would be a good idea. Obviously, it's going to throw some people, because it threw me.Ā :) --
959:
I'm getting some very bizarre magic when I try to put the above comment in... It's trying to create/overwrite
2735:
Thought: at least some of the "fail" pages (not-notable, no-sources, etc) can be merged, using sectionlinks (
2314:
1348:, but I think it looks ugly. It would need some redesigning. I'd rather not bother, I think it's fine as is.
260:
that would return the corresponding language name when the associated language prefix is entered? I mean, if
4815:
4423:
4369:
4338:
4245:
4217:
4159:. The wizard is fundamentally about notability, because it's fundamentally about getting an article started
3958:
3914:
3891:
3881:
3851:
3082:
3078:
2806:
2802:
2481:
2477:
2364:
2136:
488:
Editintro and preload are probably the weakest area, sure. Got to start somewhere - it's a draft born today.
263:
136:
126:
106:
2850:
4387:
3225:
1654:
491:
Different preloads and editintros for different article types occurred to me, and is probably a good idea.
96:
116:
4800:
4654:
4322:
4308:
4273:
3705:
3534:
2385:
2344:
2274:
2244:
2114:
2033:
2934:
Editnotices are a technical solution to a social problem, thus will never be a total solution. I think
2823:
is fully protected and widely used I've posted on talk there first - please comment there too. cheers.
2354:
1102:
4763:
4524:
OK. I guess if we wanted the functionality suggested, we'd need to file a bug and be very patient...
4240:
comment brackets. That way people can see the example without it showing up when they save the page.
4122:
3818:
3621:
2854:
2708:
2395:
2053:
1835:
1315:
1284:
837:
629:
527:
1977:
are for. Trying to use them directly gets the pipes misinterpreted as template parameter separators.
804:
Not sure where it belongs but it might be nice to remind them they can start an article, then go to
4058:
4040:
4029:
3998:
3994:
3987:
3150:
2909:
Well, I suppose we'd need a new MediaWiki notice or something to replace the Deleted Page notice -
2567:
2264:
2224:
2211:
2128:
2092:
1872:
1715:
1680:
1658:
1627:
1558:
1538:
1518:
971:
940:
295:
4826:
4803:
4778:
4767:
4741:
4712:
4676:
4663:
4623:
4594:
4556:
4537:
4528:
4519:
4500:
4481:
4470:
4427:
4396:
4373:
4358:
4342:
4312:
4298:
4277:
4262:
4249:
4232:
4221:
4190:
4175:
4130:
4114:
4086:
4077:
4062:
4047:
4033:
4005:
3962:
3948:
3935:
3918:
3904:
3895:
3869:
3855:
3835:
3824:
3800:
3791:
3779:
3764:
3735:
3709:
3691:
3682:
3652:
3627:
3588:
3538:
3515:
3511:). I'm not totally sure about this in its current form; perhaps it can be improved. Any thoughts?
3482:
3458:
3425:
3416:
3398:
3378:
3357:
3341:
3317:
3302:
3287:
3233:
3211:
3198:
3174:
3153:
3133:
3114:
2978:
2949:
2917:
2904:
2885:
2874:
2836:
2827:
2796:
2779:
2756:
2743:
2727:
2714:
2691:
2673:
2577:
2558:
2545:
2187:
2160:
1994:
1985:
1952:
1939:
1930:
1904:
1884:
1875:
1858:
1844:
1802:
1792:
1766:
1757:
1736:
1727:
1718:
1709:
1683:
1674:
1661:
1648:
1630:
1593:
1579:
1570:
1561:
1551:
1541:
1532:
1521:
1496:
1485:
1475:
1439:
1425:
1415:
1352:
1339:
1330:
1321:
1302:
1292:
1247:
1233:
1216:
1194:
1164:
1141:
1117:
1078:
1059:
1050:
1030:
993:
984:
953:
909:
863:
853:
843:
694:
661:
635:
616:
590:
533:
506:
465:
414:
405:
376:
363:
350:
325:
299:
246:
186:
4587:
4514:
4476:
4391:
4353:
4293:
4156:
3954:
3910:
3887:
3886:
Never mind, my proposal is too wordy. "...NEW THING I'VE HEARD OR CREATED" sounds about rightĀ :)
3877:
3847:
3678:
2899:
2869:
2720:
2254:
1980:
1925:
1899:
1839:
1787:
1752:
1704:
1491:
1470:
1159:
1087:
Mr.Z-man is responding to my use of {{REVISIONUSER}} and Rd232 is responding to my suggestion of
1069:
1041:
652:
581:
456:
1155:
4326:
4318:
3446:
2469:
2405:
2334:
2073:
234:
The submission does not provide enough context for unfamiliar readers to identify the subject.
998:
It should have shown your user name. {{REVISIONUSER}} shows the last user to revise the page
4646:
4510:
4490:
4440:
4304:
4269:
4100:
3701:
3530:
2817:
2512:
2493:
2234:
2063:
2043:
1283:
This gets rid of the whole "I would like to" bit before each option. Short and sweet I say.
398:
343:
318:
242:
4434:
4106:
thing is undeniably cool, I'm nonetheless not convinced this expansion of the Subject page
1006:. Special:Mypage works as well, but is not as obvious and does not need to be on a subpage.
4791:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ASearch&search=asfd+sadf+asdf&go=Go
4759:
4758:. Cut down the policy explanations and expand on how to do what the tab topic deals with.
4669:
4580:
4347:
I think it is, look at the HTML source of the pages you named and search for example.com.
4017:
3813:
3772:
3616:
3052:
2768:
2703:
2458:
2170:
1310:
1055:
Really - why? It uses the standard ambox template (like wikify). It might need subst-ing?
832:
770:
I like the idea of a screen shot showing them what to do. However, this one is confusing:
624:
522:
387:
4364:
removing random instances of example.com showing up on articles created with the Wizard.
3102:. Is this approach good? What can we do to advertise these as cat's that need processing?
3026:
Are there too many steps? What, if any, steps can be usefully combined, bearing in mind
2597:
Are there too many steps? What, if any, steps can be usefully combined, bearing in mind
132:
were not being called independently it seemed to make sense to move them to subpages of
4755:
4612:
4054:
4025:
3754:
3598:
3548:
3522:
3454:
3412:
3394:
3350:
3337:
3283:
3191:
3062:
Another thing: we could do with an explanatory image on the edit instruction template (
3027:
2942:
2784:
Another thing: we could do with an explanatory image on the edit instruction template (
2598:
2180:
1851:
1831:
1742:
1110:
1023:
966:
935:
929:
902:
805:
291:
183:
1892:
4819:
4730:
4690:
4641:
4182:
4021:
3674:
3544:
3526:
3326:
2538:
2441:
2203:
2150:
1746:
1615:
1435:
1411:
1229:
1066:
1038:
922:
649:
578:
453:
369:
2832:
Should the mainspace and userspace create boxes (at Step 6) be the other way round?
1260:
It looks great to me. My suggestion would be to tweak the wording so it's tighter.
4168:
4152:
3092:
Should the mainspace and userspace create boxes (at Step 6) be the other way round?
3033:
Are the steps in the right order? In particular, should Sources precede Notability?
2604:
Are the steps in the right order? In particular, should Sources precede Notability?
3277:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Shgfsahdgiuoh&action=edit&redlink=1
3149:
can help. I wouldn't be surprised if you can find a less wordy to say this.Ā :) --
926:
4486:
Well I guess you're right, but I can't find this recorded anywhere. (Like, say,
4379:
4303:
Wow, I didn't know that special page existed. Learn something new everyday.Ā :-)
4148:
4144:
3158:
Well I'm quite pleased with myself (hence changing the header!): I've got it so
1971:
393:
338:
313:
238:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3248:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Article_wizard2.0/Wizard-Ready_for_submission
783:
The screenshot shows the Minor edit and watch this page buttons inside they box
612:, which I find it hard to imagine many newbies being willing or able to parse.
4823:
4775:
4738:
4709:
4673:
4620:
4591:
4553:
4534:
4525:
4497:
4467:
4259:
4229:
4187:
4172:
4111:
4083:
4074:
4044:
4002:
3945:
3932:
3901:
3866:
3832:
3797:
3788:
3776:
3732:
3688:
3649:
3585:
3512:
3507:
since it's now part of the template). I've added it to the article skeleton (
3479:
3422:
3375:
3314:
3299:
3208:
3171:
3130:
3111:
2975:
2914:
2882:
2833:
2824:
2793:
2776:
2753:
2740:
2724:
2688:
2670:
2574:
2555:
2542:
2157:
2029:. There are loads of these, but some are more obvious candidates than others:
1991:
1961:
1949:
1936:
1920:
now. I think the nice green arrow should somehow be worked into the last page
1881:
1855:
1799:
1763:
1733:
1724:
1671:
1645:
1590:
1576:
1567:
1548:
1529:
1482:
1422:
1349:
1336:
1327:
1299:
1244:
1213:
1191:
1138:
1056:
990:
860:
850:
691:
613:
503:
411:
373:
360:
3614:
I'll try talking to the NPP, but if you have other thoughts, I'm listening.--
2330:; db notices: bio/test/spam/web/notability/inc/club/band/nocontent/nocontext
925:){{REVISIONUSER}} shows the last user to edit the page, not the current user
894:
This uses a little trick with {{REVISIONUSER}} to show the current user when
576:
we've already asked people if they have reliable sources is a bit backward).
4383:
3450:
3408:
3390:
3333:
3279:
2813:- especially Noexactmatch as it's part of a redesign proposal. Also because
2701:
Regarding #4, I hope to work on something on Friday, if that isnāt too late.
355:
Fair enough on both points. The "2.0" was bunged in because of the existing
3019:, which seems not to be under particularly active development or promotion
2656:, which seems not to be under particularly active development or promotion
3207:
currently points people in the right direction without going into detail.
3374:. There's a limit to how much that helps with tracking deletions though.
1863:
Personally, I find the green arrows visually appealing. Avoiding TLDR is
1431:
1407:
1224:
3110:) to help focus on Things That Need Doing. If I missed anything, sorry.
1274:
From "Which kind of user are you?" to "What would you like to do first?"
686:
Just wondering what you think of the wizard after the recent revisions.
3521:
I actually don't like the function of it at this point. Take a look at
4016:
Hawaii radio station, Hawaii geography, Hawaiian royalty) categories (
1146:
It is, to properly show the user who edited the current revision. The
3687:
TouchƩ. That didn't occur to me - thanks for pointing it out. Done.
3445:
Good idea, but where is that covered elsewhere. Maybe I can beef up
3166:) if appropriate, otherwise it loads the edit instructions (now at
368:
PS - The vast majority of the work was done by the creators of the
3547:, or duplication? (b) If we have the template, should it link to
3529:
is for (to an extent). I actually posted on your talk page, too.
3011:). It's been suggested that an additional space would be better (
2648:). It's been suggested that an additional space would be better (
2541:
on the relevant notability pages. Probably they should come out.
4228:
think. Perhaps the edit instructions should be clearer somehow?
2629:
Encourage editors to search for alternatives first? See section
335:(add a space), so it's more standard, therefore less confusing.
4794:
understand). The reason I raise this is because of the RFC on
786:
My guess is you copied an old screen shot and it needs updating
4785:"There were no results matching the query." to link to Wizard
4619:
about iphones etc, can we? Anyway, feedback on this redesign?
3089:- especially Noexactmatch as it's part of a redesign proposal.
2736:
2723:... I'll try and make a list of places to promote it by then.
1267:
or, if we don't want to encourage wanting, change the question
1122:
Well I think those last comments clarify things. It is indeed
270:
25:
3072:
Knowledge:Articles for creation/Wizard-New edit instructions
2790:
Knowledge:Articles for creation/Wizard-New edit instructions
2447:
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Starting an article
989:
I've switched to Special:Mypage. Do you still get problems?
4638:
Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Wizard-Biographical notability
4256:
Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Wizard-New edit instructions A
3721:
Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Wizard-New edit instructions A
2881:
shouldn't, but, that aside it's the best solution I think.
1679:
Works for me.Ā :) I'm off to add something help to WT:CP. --
1335:
Clarified - hope that addresses your concern sufficiently.
4258:
though to hopefully make this clearer and more prominent.
1924:
as well, to present a clear flow to the eventual article.
1850:
Mmm, I'm on the fence. Anyone else have an opinion? About
1365:
What will happen with users who cheat to the interrogator?
4796:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/new_users#Drive-by_tagging
3205:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructionsB
3168:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructionsA
3164:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructionsB
2200:
Knowledge:Articles for creation/Wizard-Already Registered
2147:
Knowledge:Articles for creation/Wizard-Already Registered
278:
4606:
Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Wizard-Ready for submission
4282:
One can already see which articles have such a link via
3372:
Category:Userspace drafts created via the Article Wizard
3160:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructions
3064:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructions
2867:
to bring people back to the wizard. It's a dead end ATM.
2786:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructions
2617:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-New edit instructions
2098:
and 2; most of the CSD nomination and deletion templates
1106:. But I'm going to drop this since it is confusing. ---
281:
home page to find the Interlingua version of Knowledge.
4810:
4790:
4584:
4288:
4107:
3953:
I'll see if I can come up with something this weekend.
3842:
Proposal for Step 2 - "Something I invented or created"
3785:
3750:
3746:
3673:
why/how/where this template pops up. Explain yourself!
3276:
3127:
3125:
3057:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Ready for submission
3020:
2773:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Ready for submission
2657:
1945:
1922:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Ready for submission
1780:
1345:
1210:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Ready for submission
4333:, etc. don't contain the word "example", for example.
4167:) to note V, OR and perhaps clarify NPOV - but these,
3727:). The labels seemed a bit hard to read so I then did
2619:) be improved? It certainly needs the image updating (
1083:
I think there is confusion on my last two comments. I
3942:
Knowledge:Knowledge is not for things made up one day
3929:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Neologisms/Sandbox
3564:
My answers would be that in the short term at least,
2970:
In this case a massive garish icon seems called for:
2678:
Well on point 7 I've added a Search First section to
2631:
Knowledge:Article wizard#Does the page already exist?
2537:
I've just noticed I've left in references to the old
479:
Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Website notability
3243:
Folks, I cannot emphasis this enough, on this page:
268:
is entered, it should return the following comment:
3923:OK - do you want to draft a new page? You can copy
3646:
Knowledge:Where to get feedback on your new article
3187:
Which leads to how to deal with disambiguation. ---
3023:(and currently has shortcuts WP:WIZ and WP:WIZARD).
2936:
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Signatures
2894:
Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia talk:Questions
2660:(and currently has shortcuts WP:WIZ and WP:WIZARD).
1909:Hmpf, I made more mistakes than I should have, but
1741:There are only slight display differences, compare
563:
Does your article fail? (notability, NPOV, copyvio)
410:Well I'll add that to the Outstanding Issues then.
4239:At least place the link within <!-- ... --: -->
4163:. We can (probably should) expand the fifth step (
2103:Knowledge:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Knowledge
1701:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Subject/sandbox
372:wizard from which it was adapted - kudos to them.
359:; we might be able to agree to just replace that.
4809:I actually did this in mid-September, and it was
4724:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Wizard-Not quite yet
3036:The template currently refers to the <ref: -->
2607:The template currently refers to the <ref: -->
4533:Could apply it to the userspace drafts, though.
3745:I have seen more mistakes and blank pages (e.g.
3570:Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard
3364:Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard
3294:userspace draft and how to put it live (perhaps
3096:Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard
2750:Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard
1464:Maybe it should be rewritten along the lines of
1158:), so I wouldn't rely on it in too many places.
310:random & thrown in at the moment. Thoughts?
206:It might also be good to get a context comment.
4292:. Some of them use it legitimately, of course.
3719:Well I made an image for the edit instructions
2972:Template:Editnotices/Page/New article name here
2626:Copyediting and general improvement, of course.
2082:Knowledge:Template messages/User talk namespace
2027:Knowledge:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates
1466:WP:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Website notability
1454:WP:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Company notability
1264:I prefer "I want to" over "I would like to..."
451:so the target audience is slightly different.
4317:Nor does it seem to be completely accurate -
3925:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Neologisms
3900:How about "NEW PHRASE/WORD or NEW CREATION"?
3863:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Neologisms
8:
4513:. I've added something to the template doc.
2451:Template:Editnotices/Page/Help talk:Contents
1666:Found an arrow on the Commons, and added it
4722:A comment on VPR leads to me look again at
4165:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Wizard-Content
3106:I've archived some threads pretty quickly (
3015:), but alternatively, it could replace the
2652:), but alternatively, it could replace the
1828:WP:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Subject/sandbox
142:which does call them. Thus they are now at
4604:As previously threatened, I've redesigned
3466:Knowledge:So you made a user subpage draft
3405:Knowledge:So you made a user subpage draft
3108:Knowledge talk:Article wizard2.0/Archive 1
2680:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Subject
2552:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Sources
2422:Knowledge:Tutorial (Wrap-up and more info)
1638:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Content
822:Default creation should be in user subpage
4207:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0/Userfeedback
4161:if an article on the subject is justified
868:To prompt for a user subpage, transclude
4475:__NOINDEX__ doesn't work in main space.
4186:paragraph on the Content page slightly.
3266:above all new articles already states:
3162:now loads an "oh no, the page exists!" (
1624:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
1206:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/Userfeedback
1188:Template:Article wizard/userpageskeleton
3387:Knowledge:So you made a userspace draft
3311:Knowledge:So you made a userspace draft
3296:Knowledge:So you made a userspace draft
3124:Suddenly spotted a flaw in the Wizard:
1204:I've added a link on the Intro page to
551:Would you like to start an article now?
196:Could we separate not notable from A7?
4466:stays in the article for a long time?
3468:a lot, enough to justify adding it to
2974:. Unprotected, let's see how it goes.
2862:Editnotices/Page/New article name here
2593:Trying to summarise and move forward:
1867:going to be hard when there's so much
1370:No one escapes the Spanish Inquisition
1019:in the preload for a user subpage. ---
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3831:option more prominent and desirable.
3595:Knowledge:New contributors' help page
3582:Knowledge:New contributors' help page
3553:Knowledge:New contributors' help page
3007:(to avoid clashing with the original
2898:I don't know. Was just a thought.Ā :)
2644:(to avoid clashing with the original
7:
3775:), with the userspace option below.
3729:File:Article Wizard 2.0 graphic2.jpg
3670:Template talk:New unreviewed article
2663:What else needs doing to the wizard?
1406:Too bad it won't be accepted, ever.
961:User:Thinboy00/new article name here
557:Does your article fail? (notability)
331:I'd also suggest moving the name to
4640:probably could benefit from having
3725:File:Article Wizard 2.0 graphic.jpg
3068:Image:ArticlesForCreationEntry2.JPG
2911:MediaWiki:ArticleThatShouldn'tExist
2621:Image:ArticlesForCreationEntry2.JPG
2418:Knowledge:Contributing to Knowledge
2107:Knowledge:Contributing to Knowledge
1824:WP:Article wizard2.0/Wizard-Subject
883:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/subpage
870:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0/subpage
386:. It's not a huge deal, I'm just a
751:? (Both first and third questions)
24:
3203:Ye-es. What do you mean exactly?
1889:That sounds like I'm doing it?Ā :)
1642:Knowledge talk:Copyright problems
1620:Knowledge talk:Copyright problems
560:Does your article fail? (sources)
4706:WP:So you made a userspace draft
4284:Special:LinkSearch/*.example.com
4011:What I'm talking about is using
3784:I've added an Are You Ready box
3597:is probably staffed better than
3566:Category:Unreviewed new articles
3551:, or perhaps somewhere else (eg
3509:template:Article wizard/skeleton
3505:Category:Unreviewed new articles
3368:Category:Unreviewed new articles
3100:Category:Unreviewed new articles
1911:
1891:
1771:
1241:Category:Unreviewed new articles
610:Knowledge:Article wizard/company
258:Template:AFC submission/comments
29:
4789:If you search for a term, like
4349:Template:Infobox martial artist
4331:Template:Infobox martial artist
3940:This would be a good resource:
3884:) 21:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
3478:. Comments/amendments welcome.
3385:Thank you, I will start on the
2615:How can the edit instructions (
2086:Category:User warning templates
1699:How about something like this:
711:Comments on article Wizard 2.0
4529:12:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
4520:12:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
4501:11:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
4496:, where it would be helpful!)
4482:11:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
4471:11:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
4428:23:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4397:23:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4374:23:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4359:22:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4343:22:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4313:22:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4299:21:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4278:21:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4263:20:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4250:20:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4233:20:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4222:19:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
4176:11:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
4131:23:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
4115:01:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
4087:01:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
4078:06:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
4063:06:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
4048:05:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
4034:05:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
4006:05:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
3861:That could be an expansion of
3836:10:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
3825:15:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
3801:10:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
3792:19:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
3780:19:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
3765:17:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
3736:15:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
3710:20:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
3692:10:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
3683:15:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
3653:00:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
3628:21:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
3589:10:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
3539:03:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
3516:17:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
3483:20:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
3459:01:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
3426:22:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3417:20:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3399:20:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3379:18:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3362:We currently have (preloaded)
3358:18:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3342:18:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3318:18:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3303:18:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3288:18:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
3239:New page goes to Userfied page
3234:20:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
3212:22:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
3199:22:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
3175:21:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
3154:20:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
3134:20:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
2979:21:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
1344:Alternatively, something like
763:Screen shot doesn't match text
736:Selecting "Website" in Subject
1:
3963:19:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
3949:10:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
3936:09:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
3919:03:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
3905:08:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
3896:21:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
3870:20:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
3856:20:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
3115:19:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2950:16:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2918:13:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2905:13:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2886:12:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2875:12:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2837:17:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2828:16:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2797:15:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2780:16:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2757:15:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
2744:01:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
2728:15:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
2715:17:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
2692:13:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
2674:18:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
2578:20:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2559:17:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2546:13:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
2438:Help:Contents/Getting started
2430:Knowledge:Starting an article
2188:22:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
2161:17:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
2149:(done); maybe other pages in
2119:Knowledge:Starting an article
1995:21:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1986:21:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1953:21:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1940:17:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1931:16:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1905:16:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1885:15:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1876:15:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1859:15:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1845:15:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1803:14:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1793:14:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1767:14:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1758:14:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1737:14:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1728:14:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1719:14:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1710:14:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1684:14:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1675:14:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1662:13:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1649:13:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1631:13:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1594:13:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1580:13:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1571:13:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1562:13:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1552:13:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1542:13:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1533:13:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1522:12:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1497:21:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1486:20:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1476:20:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1440:18:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1426:13:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1416:12:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1353:16:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
1340:15:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
1331:19:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1322:17:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1303:12:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1293:02:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1248:01:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1234:05:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
1195:18:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
1165:10:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1142:17:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
1118:11:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
1079:04:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
721:Sample name in COMPANY option
695:16:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
662:03:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
415:20:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
406:20:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
247:18:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
18:Knowledge talk:Article wizard
4827:12:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
4804:04:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
4779:20:38, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
4768:20:10, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
4742:09:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
4713:11:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
4677:11:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
4664:06:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
4633:(Moved from Feedback page).
4624:16:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
4557:14:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
4191:11:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
3066:), like the AFC wizard has:
3013:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0
2788:), like the AFC wizard has:
2767:I've also added a shortcut (
2650:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0
2434:Knowledge:Your first article
2123:Knowledge:Your first article
1636:Mmm, I've tried doing this:
1618:. Perhaps they should go to
1611:Knowledge:Copyright problems
1511:Knowledge:Your first article
817:More substantive suggestions
384:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0
333:Knowledge:Article wizard 2.0
209:So my suggestions would be;
4595:08:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
4538:20:23, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
4433:Alternatively, use Google:
3944:. (You're probably aware.)
3005:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0
2719:OK, we can wait for that -
2642:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0
1668:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0
1217:11:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
1060:15:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
1051:12:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
1031:11:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
1002:but shows the current user
994:10:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
985:07:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
954:07:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
910:20:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
864:19:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
854:19:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
844:19:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
688:Knowledge:Article wizard2.0
636:14:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
617:22:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
591:21:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
534:19:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
507:18:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
471:OK, some fair points there.
466:18:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
377:14:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
364:14:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
351:14:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
326:14:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
256:Could we have some code at
187:19:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
4843:
4668:I've added a reference to
3003:Name: currently housed at
2640:Name: currently housed at
2426:Knowledge:Article creation
2023:Category:Welcome templates
4542:Which I've now done (via
4092:Expansion of Subject page
3332:I LOVE this concept BTW.
3264:MediaWiki:Newarticletextā
1944:? Whatever strange thing
1448:Wizard-Company notability
517:I like the category idea.
252:Please expand lang switch
3741:Mistakes and blank pages
3731:. What do people think?
3493:Um, I've tried creating
3147:Knowledge:Disambiguation
3087:MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new
3017:Knowledge:Article wizard
3009:Knowledge:Article wizard
2811:MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new
2654:Knowledge:Article wizard
2646:Knowledge:Article wizard
2635:Knowledge:Article wizard
2521:Help:Starting a new page
2486:MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new
2414:Knowledge:Introduction 2
2141:MediaWiki:Newarticletext
2133:MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new
2111:Knowledge:Introduction 2
1584:The solution to make it
1481:Absolutely right. Done.
1380:learn it the hard way!
300:10:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
157:AFC submission/reviewing
4816:MediaWiki:Noarticletext
3083:MediaWiki:Noarticletext
3051:I've added a shortcut (
2807:MediaWiki:Noarticletext
2482:MediaWiki:Noarticletext
1948:, it clearly works.Ā :)
1150:use to show the editor
177:AFC submission/declined
4751:(moved from Feedback)
4699:new unreviewed article
4600:Submission page revamp
4461:new unreviewed article
4451:new unreviewed article
4388:Special:AbuseFilter/18
3498:New unreviewed article
3079:MediaWiki:Noexactmatch
2803:MediaWiki:Noexactmatch
2478:MediaWiki:Noexactmatch
2305:nonsense-warn-deletion
2137:MediaWiki:Noexactmatch
1838:, but it's your call.
1655:Knowledge:Introduction
1384:Make it mandatory for
795:Point them to Feedback
147:AFC submission/pending
92:Since the 4 templates
4644:mentioned somewhere.
4416:<-- outdent -: -->
4323:User:Octane/userboxes
4289:User:Amalthea/Sandbox
3796:Sorted by Gadget850.
2851:New article name here
2846:New article name here
2115:Knowledge:Maintenance
1452:The second option at
1208:, plus a reminder at
554:What kind of article?
279:Interlingua Knowledge
167:AFC submission/onhold
42:of past discussions.
4726:, and note that the
3909:Sounds about right.
2166:Help desk template:
2127:MediaWiki messages (
1000:when viewed directly
88:Centralize templates
4139:generally, it's on
3988:User talk:Viriditas
3464:Well I've expanded
3262:If you notice, the
2993:Outstanding issues2
2295:empty-warn-deletion
2129:Special:AllMessages
1743:my monobook display
1396:in very fine print,
758:Medium sized points
4013:Article wizard 2.0
2792:. Any volunteers?
2589:Outstanding issues
2325:Db-nonsense-notice
1127:UserWorkInProgress
1092:UserWorkInProgress
1014:UserWorkInProgress
1009:We should include
921:(undent)(see also
747:. Shouldn't it be
566:Write the article.
4661:
4575:Impact on CSD G11
4327:User:Guardians611
4319:User:Peregrinusss
4141:subject inclusion
4137:content inclusion
3074:. Any volunteers?
2998:General questions
1747:my vector display
1397:
1103:User:Gadget850/T1
477:get it accepted.
357:WP:Article wizard
288:
287:
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4834:
4735:
4729:
4703:
4697:
4689:A suggestion at
4685:WikiProject help
4662:
4653:
4649:
4617:
4611:
4551:
4545:
4517:
4495:
4489:
4479:
4465:
4459:
4455:
4449:
4445:
4439:
4394:
4356:
4296:
4291:
4105:
4099:
3823:
3821:
3816:
3757:
3626:
3624:
3619:
3502:
3496:
3477:
3471:
3403:I just started:
3353:
3194:
3021:what links there
2945:
2902:
2872:
2866:
2860:
2822:
2816:
2713:
2711:
2706:
2658:what links there
2572:
2566:
2517:
2511:
2498:
2492:
2474:
2468:
2463:
2457:
2410:
2404:
2400:
2394:
2390:
2384:
2379:
2375:Nocontent-notice
2373:
2369:
2363:
2359:
2353:
2349:
2343:
2339:
2333:
2329:
2323:
2319:
2313:
2309:
2303:
2299:
2293:
2289:
2285:nn-warn-deletion
2283:
2279:
2273:
2269:
2263:
2259:
2253:
2249:
2243:
2239:
2233:
2229:
2223:
2216:
2210:
2183:
2175:
2169:
2097:
2091:
2088:. In particular
2078:
2072:
2068:
2062:
2058:
2052:
2048:
2042:
2038:
2032:
1983:
1976:
1970:
1966:
1960:
1928:
1919:
1915:
1914:
1902:
1895:
1842:
1790:
1783:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1755:
1707:
1494:
1473:
1395:
1320:
1318:
1313:
1162:
1131:
1125:
1113:
1096:
1090:
1077:
1049:
1026:
1018:
1012:
1004:when transcluded
979:
974:
969:
948:
943:
938:
905:
842:
840:
835:
660:
634:
632:
627:
589:
532:
530:
525:
464:
403:
401:
396:
348:
346:
341:
323:
321:
316:
271:
267:
181:
175:
171:
165:
161:
155:
151:
145:
141:
135:
131:
125:
121:
115:
111:
105:
101:
95:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4842:
4841:
4837:
4836:
4835:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4787:
4749:
4733:
4727:
4720:
4701:
4695:
4687:
4659:
4652:
4647:
4631:
4615:
4609:
4602:
4581:User:Black Kite
4577:
4549:
4547:Userspace draft
4543:
4515:
4493:
4487:
4477:
4463:
4457:
4453:
4447:
4443:
4437:
4392:
4354:
4294:
4287:
4268:made, however.
4203:
4123:Fuhghettaboutit
4103:
4097:
4094:
4018:Category:Hawaii
3983:
3844:
3819:
3814:
3812:
3763:
3755:
3743:
3717:
3622:
3617:
3615:
3545:New Page Patrol
3527:new page patrol
3500:
3494:
3491:
3475:
3473:Userspace draft
3469:
3351:
3241:
3226:Test03984102834
3192:
3122:
2995:
2943:
2900:
2870:
2864:
2858:
2848:
2820:
2814:
2709:
2704:
2702:
2591:
2570:
2564:
2529:
2515:
2509:
2506:
2496:
2490:
2472:
2466:
2461:
2455:
2408:
2402:
2398:
2392:
2388:
2382:
2377:
2371:
2367:
2361:
2357:
2351:
2347:
2341:
2337:
2331:
2327:
2321:
2317:
2311:
2307:
2301:
2297:
2291:
2287:
2281:
2277:
2271:
2267:
2261:
2257:
2251:
2247:
2241:
2237:
2231:
2227:
2221:
2214:
2208:
2196:
2181:
2173:
2167:
2101:Help pages. eg
2095:
2089:
2076:
2070:
2066:
2060:
2056:
2050:
2046:
2040:
2036:
2030:
2019:
1981:
1974:
1968:
1964:
1958:
1926:
1912:
1910:
1900:
1840:
1788:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1753:
1705:
1507:
1492:
1471:
1450:
1394:Make it clear,
1367:
1316:
1311:
1309:
1285:ChildofMidnight
1258:
1202:
1160:
1129:
1123:
1111:
1094:
1088:
1065:
1037:
1024:
1016:
1010:
977:
972:
967:
946:
941:
936:
903:
838:
833:
831:
819:
760:
718:
713:
648:
630:
625:
623:
577:
528:
523:
521:
452:
429:
399:
394:
392:
344:
339:
337:
319:
314:
312:
307:
261:
254:
194:
179:
173:
169:
163:
159:
153:
149:
143:
139:
133:
129:
123:
119:
113:
109:
103:
99:
93:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4840:
4838:
4830:
4829:
4786:
4783:
4782:
4781:
4756:Help:Footnotes
4748:
4745:
4719:
4716:
4686:
4683:
4682:
4681:
4680:
4679:
4657:
4630:
4627:
4601:
4598:
4576:
4573:
4572:
4571:
4570:
4569:
4568:
4567:
4566:
4565:
4564:
4563:
4562:
4561:
4560:
4559:
4414:
4413:
4412:
4411:
4410:
4409:
4408:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4315:
4236:
4235:
4202:
4199:
4198:
4197:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4181:Sources page.
4093:
4090:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4067:
4066:
4065:
3982:
3981:Article Wizard
3979:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3967:
3966:
3965:
3843:
3840:
3839:
3838:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3773:the final step
3759:
3742:
3739:
3716:
3713:
3697:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3635:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3607:
3606:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3578:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3556:
3490:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3438:
3437:
3436:
3435:
3434:
3433:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3428:
3352:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
3330:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3273:
3272:
3251:
3250:
3240:
3237:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3193:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
3180:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3151:Moonriddengirl
3121:
3118:
3104:
3103:
3093:
3090:
3075:
3060:
3043:
3042:
3039:
3034:
3031:
3024:
2994:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2944:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2897:
2891:
2868:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2840:
2839:
2830:
2799:
2782:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2699:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2661:
2638:
2627:
2624:
2613:
2610:
2605:
2602:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2573:does the job.
2548:
2539:Article Wizard
2528:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2518:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2488:
2475:
2464:
2453:
2444:
2411:
2380:
2365:Nocontent-warn
2315:Nn-warn-reason
2218:
2206:
2195:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2182:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
2155:
2154:
2144:
2125:
2099:
2079:
2018:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1978:
1890:
1873:Moonriddengirl
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1785:
1750:
1716:Moonriddengirl
1698:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1681:Moonriddengirl
1659:Moonriddengirl
1628:Moonriddengirl
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1559:Moonriddengirl
1544:
1539:Moonriddengirl
1519:Moonriddengirl
1506:
1505:Great idea,but
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1469:
1463:
1457:
1449:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1404:
1403:
1400:
1392:
1389:
1366:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1305:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1275:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1201:
1198:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1156:bugzilla:19006
1112:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
1098:
1025:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
1007:
930:Special:Mypage
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
904:Gadget850Ā (Ed)
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
856:
824:
823:
818:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
797:
796:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
784:
781:
778:
774:
765:
764:
759:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
738:
737:
733:
732:
731:
730:
723:
722:
717:
714:
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
619:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
569:
568:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
518:
515:
500:
499:
495:
492:
489:
486:
482:
473:
472:
428:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
366:
306:
303:
286:
285:
282:
275:
264:AFC submission
253:
250:
236:
235:
228:
227:
219:
218:
193:
190:
182:respectively.
137:AFC submission
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4839:
4828:
4825:
4821:
4817:
4812:
4808:
4807:
4806:
4805:
4802:
4797:
4792:
4784:
4780:
4777:
4772:
4771:
4770:
4769:
4765:
4761:
4757:
4752:
4746:
4744:
4743:
4740:
4732:
4725:
4717:
4715:
4714:
4711:
4707:
4700:
4692:
4684:
4678:
4675:
4671:
4667:
4666:
4665:
4660:
4655:
4651:
4650:
4643:
4639:
4636:
4635:
4634:
4628:
4626:
4625:
4622:
4614:
4607:
4599:
4597:
4596:
4593:
4589:
4585:
4582:
4574:
4558:
4555:
4548:
4541:
4540:
4539:
4536:
4532:
4531:
4530:
4527:
4523:
4522:
4521:
4518:
4512:
4508:
4504:
4503:
4502:
4499:
4492:
4485:
4484:
4483:
4480:
4474:
4473:
4472:
4469:
4462:
4452:
4442:
4435:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4429:
4425:
4421:
4420:98.248.33.198
4398:
4395:
4389:
4385:
4381:
4377:
4376:
4375:
4371:
4367:
4366:98.248.33.198
4362:
4361:
4360:
4357:
4350:
4346:
4345:
4344:
4340:
4336:
4335:98.248.33.198
4332:
4328:
4324:
4320:
4316:
4314:
4310:
4306:
4302:
4301:
4300:
4297:
4290:
4285:
4281:
4280:
4279:
4275:
4271:
4266:
4265:
4264:
4261:
4257:
4253:
4252:
4251:
4247:
4243:
4242:98.248.33.198
4238:
4237:
4234:
4231:
4226:
4225:
4224:
4223:
4219:
4215:
4214:98.248.33.198
4210:
4208:
4200:
4192:
4189:
4184:
4179:
4178:
4177:
4174:
4170:
4166:
4162:
4158:
4154:
4150:
4146:
4142:
4138:
4134:
4133:
4132:
4128:
4124:
4119:
4118:
4117:
4116:
4113:
4108:
4102:
4091:
4089:
4088:
4085:
4080:
4079:
4076:
4064:
4060:
4056:
4051:
4050:
4049:
4046:
4042:
4037:
4036:
4035:
4031:
4027:
4023:
4022:expert system
4019:
4014:
4010:
4009:
4008:
4007:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3980:
3964:
3960:
3956:
3955:Singularity42
3952:
3951:
3950:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3938:
3937:
3934:
3930:
3926:
3922:
3921:
3920:
3916:
3912:
3911:Singularity42
3908:
3907:
3906:
3903:
3899:
3898:
3897:
3893:
3889:
3888:Singularity42
3885:
3883:
3879:
3878:Singularity42
3873:
3872:
3871:
3868:
3864:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3857:
3853:
3849:
3848:Singularity42
3841:
3837:
3834:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3826:
3822:
3817:
3802:
3799:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3790:
3786:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3778:
3774:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3766:
3762:
3758:
3752:
3748:
3740:
3738:
3737:
3734:
3730:
3726:
3722:
3714:
3712:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3693:
3690:
3686:
3685:
3684:
3680:
3676:
3671:
3667:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3651:
3647:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3629:
3625:
3620:
3613:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3608:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3591:
3590:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3575:
3572:which covers
3571:
3567:
3563:
3562:
3561:
3560:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3536:
3532:
3528:
3524:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3499:
3488:
3484:
3481:
3474:
3467:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3456:
3452:
3448:
3427:
3424:
3420:
3419:
3418:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3401:
3400:
3396:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3356:
3355:
3354:
3345:
3344:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3328:
3323:
3319:
3316:
3312:
3309:Incidentally
3308:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3304:
3301:
3297:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3278:
3275:For example:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3265:
3260:
3257:
3254:
3249:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3238:
3236:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3213:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3176:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3152:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3132:
3128:
3126:
3119:
3117:
3116:
3113:
3109:
3101:
3097:
3094:
3091:
3088:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3040:
3037:</ref: -->
3035:
3032:
3029:
3025:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2992:
2980:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2951:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2937:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2919:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2907:
2906:
2903:
2895:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2884:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2873:
2863:
2856:
2852:
2845:
2843:
2838:
2835:
2831:
2829:
2826:
2819:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2798:
2795:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2781:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2759:
2758:
2755:
2751:
2746:
2745:
2742:
2738:
2729:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2712:
2707:
2700:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2690:
2685:
2681:
2676:
2675:
2672:
2665:
2662:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2639:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2625:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2611:
2608:</ref: -->
2606:
2603:
2600:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2588:
2586:
2579:
2576:
2569:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2526:
2522:
2519:
2514:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2495:
2489:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2476:
2471:
2465:
2460:
2454:
2452:
2448:
2445:
2443:
2442:Knowledge:FAQ
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2412:
2407:
2397:
2387:
2381:
2376:
2366:
2356:
2346:
2336:
2326:
2316:
2306:
2296:
2286:
2276:
2266:
2256:
2246:
2236:
2226:
2219:
2213:
2207:
2205:
2201:
2198:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2172:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2159:
2152:
2148:
2145:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2094:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2075:
2065:
2055:
2045:
2035:
2028:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2016:
1996:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1984:
1973:
1963:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1929:
1923:
1918:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1903:
1898:
1894:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1843:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1804:
1801:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1791:
1782:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1756:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1708:
1702:
1695:
1694:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1595:
1592:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1504:
1498:
1495:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1467:
1461:
1455:
1447:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1401:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1378:
1373:
1371:
1364:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1314:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1255:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1199:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1189:
1166:
1163:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1135:
1128:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1105:
1104:
1099:
1093:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1015:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
992:
988:
987:
986:
982:
981:
980:
975:
970:
962:
958:
957:
956:
955:
951:
950:
949:
944:
939:
931:
927:
924:
911:
908:
907:
906:
897:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
871:
867:
866:
865:
862:
857:
855:
852:
847:
846:
845:
841:
836:
828:
827:
826:
825:
821:
820:
816:
808:for feedback.
807:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
794:
793:
785:
782:
779:
775:
772:
771:
769:
768:
767:
766:
762:
761:
757:
750:
746:
742:
741:
740:
739:
735:
734:
727:
726:
725:
724:
720:
719:
715:
710:
696:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
663:
659:
658:
656:
651:
644:
639:
638:
637:
633:
628:
620:
618:
615:
611:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
592:
588:
587:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
562:
559:
556:
553:
550:
549:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
535:
531:
526:
519:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
502:
501:
496:
493:
490:
487:
483:
480:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
467:
463:
462:
460:
455:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
427:Some comments
426:
416:
413:
409:
408:
407:
404:
402:
397:
390:at heart.Ā :)
389:
385:
380:
379:
378:
375:
371:
367:
365:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
349:
347:
342:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
322:
317:
304:
302:
301:
297:
293:
280:
276:
272:
269:
265:
259:
251:
249:
248:
244:
240:
233:
232:
231:
224:
223:
222:
215:
214:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
197:
191:
189:
188:
185:
178:
168:
158:
148:
138:
128:
127:AFC completed
118:
108:
107:AFC reviewing
98:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4788:
4753:
4750:
4721:
4718:Find Sources
4688:
4645:
4632:
4603:
4578:
4415:
4211:
4205:(moved from
4204:
4160:
4140:
4136:
4095:
4081:
4071:
3992:
3986:copied from
3985:
3984:
3874:
3845:
3809:
3744:
3718:
3698:
3573:
3492:
3489:New template
3444:
3348:
3347:
3274:
3261:
3258:
3255:
3252:
3242:
3222:
3189:
3188:
3141:
3123:
3105:
3045:
3044:
2997:
2996:
2940:
2939:
2849:
2841:
2761:
2760:
2747:
2734:
2683:
2682:. On points
2677:
2669:
2592:
2584:
2563:Done that -
2531:
2530:
2386:Firstarticle
2345:Autobio-warn
2275:nonsensepage
2245:test1article
2178:
2177:
2156:
2034:Firstarticle
1916:
1896:
1868:
1864:
1821:
1608:
1585:
1514:
1508:
1459:
1451:
1405:
1385:
1376:
1374:
1368:
1282:
1259:
1223:
1203:
1185:
1151:
1147:
1133:
1108:
1107:
1101:
1084:
1071:
1070:
1043:
1042:
1021:
1020:
1003:
999:
965:
964:
934:
933:
932:instead. --
920:
900:
899:
895:
881:
748:
744:
716:Minor points
654:
653:
642:
583:
582:
573:
485:Suggestions?
458:
457:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
430:
391:
336:
311:
308:
289:
266:|H|lang|ia}}
255:
237:
229:
220:
211:
208:
205:
201:
198:
195:
91:
60:
43:
37:
4801:Josh Parris
4760:Tim Vickers
4648:bahamut0013
4629:Mention BLP
4583:'s comment
4380:example.com
4305:Killiondude
4270:Killiondude
4201:example.com
4157:WP:Tutorial
4096:Whilst the
3702:Killiondude
3531:Killiondude
2721:WP:Deadline
2698:burdensome.
2527:Other to do
2396:W-graphical
2131:); notably
2054:W-graphical
1869:information
1589:That page.
1490:Thanks.Ā :)
1402:Enforce it.
1308:acceptable.
983:@343, i.e.
952:@336, i.e.
896:transcluded
226:notability.
217:notability.
97:AFC pending
36:This is an
4747:Merge tabs
4390:as well).
4145:notability
3815:SPhilbrick
3618:SPhilbrick
3447:WP:Subpage
2855:Editnotice
2748:Note: see
2705:SPhilbrick
2687:feedback.
2568:quote box2
2265:empty-warn
2225:nn-welcome
2212:Uw-create1
2093:Uw-create1
1836:Common.css
1822:ā Compare
1372:. No one.
1312:SPhilbrick
834:SPhilbrick
626:SPhilbrick
524:SPhilbrick
117:AFC onhold
4384:Hyperlink
4055:Viriditas
4026:Viriditas
3756:WikiDan61
2255:spam-warn
2017:Promotion
777:editors).
388:wikignome
292:Alexius08
230:context:
80:ArchiveĀ 5
72:ArchiveĀ 3
67:ArchiveĀ 2
61:ArchiveĀ 1
4670:WP:BLP1E
4516:Amalthea
4478:Amalthea
4393:Amalthea
4355:Amalthea
4295:Amalthea
3761:ReadMe!!
3675:The-Pope
3120:Coolness
3053:WP:WIZGO
2901:Amalthea
2871:Amalthea
2769:WP:WIZGO
2470:Creation
2406:W-screen
2355:Web-warn
2335:bio-warn
2074:W-screen
1982:Amalthea
1927:Amalthea
1901:Amalthea
1897:Doing...
1841:Amalthea
1789:Amalthea
1784:then.Ā :)
1754:Amalthea
1706:Amalthea
1493:Amalthea
1472:Amalthea
1200:Feedback
1161:Amalthea
514:skipped.
305:Feedback
212:source:
4579:Noting
4491:NOINDEX
4446:in the
4441:NOINDEX
4101:tooltip
4041:WT:WIZ2
3999:WT:WIZ2
3995:WT:WIZ2
3599:WP:FEED
3549:WP:FEED
3523:WP:FEED
3028:WP:TLDR
2818:Welcome
2737:bla#bla
2633:in the
2599:WP:TLDR
2513:W-basic
2494:Welcome
2235:nn-warn
2064:W-basic
2044:Welcome
1946:you did
1852:WP:TLDR
1832:WP:TLDR
1256:Wording
1152:looking
928:. Try
806:WP:FEED
749:website
745:company
39:archive
4820:WP:VPR
4811:undone
4691:WP:VPR
4642:WP:BLP
4588:WT:CSD
4183:WP:NOR
4143:(i.e.
3593:While
3370:, and
3327:WP:VPT
3298:...).
3271:ready.
2504:Future
2459:HD/new
2204:WP:AFC
2171:HD/new
2151:WP:AFC
1865:always
1616:WP:MCQ
1586:really
923:WP:VPR
729:work.)
395:hmwith
370:WP:AFC
340:hmwith
315:hmwith
239:Taemyr
4824:Rd232
4776:Rd232
4739:Rd232
4710:Rd232
4674:Rd232
4658:deeds
4621:Rd232
4613:tmbox
4592:Rd232
4554:Rd232
4535:Rd232
4526:Rd232
4498:Rd232
4468:Rd232
4260:Rd232
4230:Rd232
4188:Rd232
4173:Rd232
4169:WP:5P
4153:WP:OR
4112:Rd232
4084:Rd232
4075:Rd232
4045:Rd232
4003:Rd232
3946:Rd232
3933:Rd232
3902:Rd232
3867:Rd232
3833:Rd232
3798:Rd232
3789:Rd232
3777:Rd232
3733:Rd232
3715:Image
3689:Rd232
3650:Rd232
3586:Rd232
3513:Rd232
3480:Rd232
3423:Rd232
3376:Rd232
3315:Rd232
3300:Rd232
3209:Rd232
3172:Rd232
3131:Rd232
3112:Rd232
3055:) to
2976:Rd232
2915:Rd232
2883:Rd232
2834:Rd232
2825:Rd232
2794:Rd232
2777:Rd232
2771:) to
2754:Rd232
2741:Rd232
2725:Rd232
2689:Rd232
2671:Rd232
2575:Rd232
2556:Rd232
2543:Rd232
2220:CSD:
2217:to 3.
2158:Rd232
1992:Rd232
1950:Rd232
1937:Rd232
1882:Rd232
1856:Rd232
1826:with
1800:Rd232
1764:Rd232
1745:with
1734:Rd232
1725:Rd232
1697:time.
1672:Rd232
1646:Rd232
1626:." --
1591:Rd232
1577:Rd232
1568:Rd232
1549:Rd232
1530:Rd232
1483:Rd232
1423:Rd232
1350:Rd232
1337:Rd232
1328:Rd232
1300:Rd232
1245:Rd232
1230:talk
1214:Rd232
1192:Rd232
1139:Rd232
1085:think
1057:Rd232
991:Rd232
898:. ---
861:Rd232
851:Rd232
692:Rd232
643:after
614:Rd232
574:after
504:Rd232
412:Rd232
374:Rd232
361:Rd232
16:<
4764:talk
4731:find
4704:and
4511:here
4509:and
4507:here
4424:talk
4370:talk
4339:talk
4309:talk
4274:talk
4246:talk
4218:talk
4151:and
4149:WP:V
4127:talk
4059:talk
4030:talk
3959:talk
3915:talk
3892:talk
3882:talk
3852:talk
3751:this
3749:and
3747:this
3706:talk
3679:talk
3535:talk
3455:talk
3451:Ikip
3413:talk
3409:Ikip
3395:talk
3391:Ikip
3338:talk
3334:Ikip
3284:talk
3280:Ikip
3230:talk
3098:and
3046:Todo
2762:Todo
2532:Done
2250:/2,
2194:Done
1967:and
1917:Done
1781:Done
1515:does
1436:talk
1412:talk
1346:this
1289:talk
1134:your
968:Thin
937:Thin
296:talk
243:talk
221:nn:
184:MSGJ
172:and
122:and
4586:on
4382:or
3927:to
3574:all
3170:).
3070:at
2857:at
2739:).
2550:On
2176:---
1462:s).
1432:NVO
1408:NVO
1386:any
1377:may
1225:DGG
1074:man
1067:Mr.
1046:man
1039:Mr.
973:boy
942:boy
657:man
650:Mr.
647:B.
586:man
579:Mr.
461:man
454:Mr.
4766:)
4734:}}
4728:{{
4702:}}
4696:{{
4616:}}
4610:{{
4552:.
4550:}}
4544:{{
4494:}}
4488:{{
4464:}}
4458:{{
4454:}}
4448:{{
4444:}}
4438:{{
4426:)
4372:)
4341:)
4329:,
4325:,
4321:,
4311:)
4276:)
4248:)
4220:)
4209:)
4129:)
4104:}}
4098:{{
4061:)
4043:?
4032:)
3961:)
3931:.
3917:)
3894:)
3854:)
3708:)
3681:)
3555:)?
3537:)
3501:}}
3495:{{
3476:}}
3470:{{
3457:)
3449:?
3415:)
3397:)
3389:.
3366:,
3349:ā
3340:)
3286:)
3232:)
3190:ā
3142:is
3085:;
3081:;
2941:ā
2865:}}
2859:{{
2821:}}
2815:{{
2809:;
2805:;
2752:.
2571:}}
2565:{{
2516:}}
2510:{{
2497:}}
2491:{{
2484:;
2480:;
2473:}}
2467:{{
2462:}}
2456:{{
2449:;
2440:;
2436:;
2432:;
2428:;
2424:;
2420:;
2416:;
2409:}}
2403:{{
2401:;
2399:}}
2393:{{
2391:;
2389:}}
2383:{{
2378:}}
2372:{{
2370:,
2368:}}
2362:{{
2360:,
2358:}}
2352:{{
2350:,
2348:}}
2342:{{
2340:,
2338:}}
2332:{{
2328:}}
2322:{{
2320:,
2318:}}
2312:{{
2310:,
2308:}}
2302:{{
2300:,
2298:}}
2292:{{
2290:,
2288:}}
2282:{{
2280:,
2278:}}
2272:{{
2270:,
2268:}}
2262:{{
2260:,
2258:}}
2252:{{
2248:}}
2242:{{
2240:;
2238:}}
2232:{{
2230:,
2228:}}
2222:{{
2215:}}
2209:{{
2202:,
2179:ā
2174:}}
2168:{{
2139:;
2135:;
2121:;
2117:;
2113:;
2109:;
2105:;
2096:}}
2090:{{
2084:/
2077:}}
2071:{{
2069:;
2067:}}
2061:{{
2059:;
2057:}}
2051:{{
2049:;
2047:}}
2041:{{
2039:;
2037:}}
2031:{{
2025:/
1975:}}
1972:!-
1969:{{
1965:}}
1959:{{
1460:OR
1438:)
1414:)
1291:)
1243:.
1232:)
1190:.
1148:ab
1130:}}
1124:{{
1109:ā
1095:}}
1089:{{
1072:Z-
1044:Z-
1022:ā
1017:}}
1011:{{
978:00
947:00
901:ā
690:.
655:Z-
584:Z-
459:Z-
298:)
290:--
284:ā
274:ā
262:{{
245:)
192:nn
180:}}
174:{{
170:}}
164:{{
162:,
160:}}
154:{{
152:,
150:}}
144:{{
140:}}
134:{{
130:}}
124:{{
120:}}
114:{{
112:,
110:}}
104:{{
102:,
100:}}
94:{{
76:ā
4814:(
4762:(
4422:(
4368:(
4337:(
4307:(
4272:(
4244:(
4216:(
4125:(
4057:(
4028:(
3957:(
3913:(
3890:(
3880:(
3850:(
3820:T
3723:(
3704:(
3677:(
3623:T
3533:(
3453:(
3411:(
3393:(
3336:(
3329:)
3282:(
3228:(
3030:?
2710:T
2684:4
2637:.
2601:?
2499:;
2153:.
2143:.
1962:!
1777:Y
1468:?
1434:(
1410:(
1317:T
1287:(
1228:(
1097:.
872::
839:T
631:T
529:T
481:.
400:t
345:t
320:t
294:(
241:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.