347:, section J says they need to "Preserve the network location, if any, given in the Document for public access to a Transparent copy of the Document." This is an important provision for Knowledge (XXG) and it should be specifically noted. It means redistributors have to link directly to our original article (HTML is transparent) or the edit page (so is wikitext). The section goes on to say that "likewise the network locations given in the Document for previous versions it was based on."; enforced literally that would mean they have to link to every oldid version. However, I think both provisions (and the general history and authorship requirements) can reasonably be satisfied with a link to the original article. I also mentioned that the history section needs to be included and changes should be noted there.
274:
Not to get all patriotic or anything, but people have an inherent right to a free press that's recognized by the U.S. Constitution. Copyright is allowed as an exception to that freedom, but it should be remembered that copyright is the exception and freedom of the press is the norm, rather than the
74:
should provide clear instructions for
Verbatim Copying and creation of Modified Versions. For more details, we can use a separate page. However, information about reusing should take up most of the page. Then, there can be short snippets about the other topics with links to the larger pages. I'll
342:
I made some changes to this section to better take into account what the GFDL actually says. First, it says nowhere that online distributors need provide a
Transparent copy of their version; even if it did, the HTML web pages suffice (the GFDL specifically mentions "simple HTML" as Transparent).
214:
isn't really the right place for this. Where to put it? Some kind of guideline page for photographers who want to upload images, I guess. Which should mention not only buildings, but also other aspects: photos of 3D visual art works, photos of persons (think personal rights), etc.
285:
It's not that the law needs to know; it's that we do. For most authors, it's obvious what parts of their work are fair use, because they wrote the other parts. However we don't know what was written by other contributors and what is included under fair use, unless that is noted.
148:. Second, I feel that the copyright page should focus more on the various copyrights, and include a summary of reuse policies along with a prominant link. Note that each edit page says "Contents must not violate any copyright", with the word "copyright" being a link to
270:
Really? Every time you quote a copyrighted work, you're supposed to note that you're using it under Fair Use, and give the copyright information? That seems extraordinarily cumbersome, not to mention completely unnecessary from a legal standpoint.
53:
for details about how the text "is available." I know from direct experience that (some) mirrors rely on the page. There are already a variety of places for copyright information designed for
Knowledge (XXG) editors, as your
40:
First, I really appreciate you taking the effort to get this moving. I've been suggesting things for a while on the talk page, but it's been dead in the water. Hopefully, this will attract attention (I've placed notices at
93:
is designed to fully explain how to reuse
Knowledge (XXG) material. Shouldn't Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights be a fuller discussion of all copyrights on Knowledge (XXG), instead of focusing on this one aspect? –
305:
I think we should give a brief summary of the "verbatim copying" case. Note that in all cases (copying a single article, bulk copying, or distributing derivatives) a
318:
310:
157:
141:
42:
46:
309:
of the full text of the GFDL must be distributed with the copy. That should be speeled out clearly. Incidentally, the example at
67:
169:"Reusing our content" sounds fine. I think you're right; the links should be different. The text at the bottom of all pages (
55:
63:
267:"If you use part of a copyrighted work under "fair use", you must make a note of that fact (along with names and dates)."
226:
247:
174:
145:
152:
as well. Then I guess it would be a separate discussion as to whether the link at the bottom of each page should go to
17:
178:
207:
49:). I feel we need to focus on reusers rights and obligations. At the bottom of every page people are referred to
230:
153:
149:
116:
71:
50:
90:
59:
352:
291:
186:
170:
124:
80:
313:
is wrong and should be corrected: it uses a link to some external copy of the GFDL. That is
211:
206:
I haven't really read the page yet (sorry, I will, I promise!), but I have just written
355:
348:
335:
325:
294:
287:
279:
254:
237:
219:
189:
182:
164:
127:
120:
98:
83:
76:
30:
108:
332:
234:
161:
95:
27:
181:) can remain as is. That should be able to help solve the focus problem nicely.
276:
322:
251:
216:
140:
Hm, this is a complex issue. First off, should the reusers page be renamed
321:
to make more explicit that "fair use" is basically a U.S.-only thing.
233:(and maybe other pages too), and linked from the template box. –
26:
I could really use help here, so speak up if have ideas. –
111:
for details") should probably go there. (the link on the
107:
Maybe, but then the link at the bottom of the page ("see
208:
Knowledge (XXG):Public domain#Photographs of buildings
225:
Yeah, it seems to me that there should be a separate
248:
Knowledge (XXG):Image_use_policy#User-created_images
319:Knowledge (XXG):Reusing Knowledge (XXG) material
311:Knowledge (XXG):Reusing Knowledge (XXG) material
158:Knowledge (XXG):Reusing Knowledge (XXG) content
142:Knowledge (XXG):Reusing Knowledge (XXG) content
8:
68:Knowledge (XXG):How to copy Knowledge (XXG)
62:should be changed as it is too similar to
210:. However, it just occurred to me that
144:? That seems the best to me. Or maybe
43:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Mirrors and forks
47:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)
7:
227:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights on images
177:for details and the edit page text (
146:Knowledge (XXG):Reusing our content
24:
317:good enough. I have also amended
64:Knowledge (XXG):Mirrors and forks
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Copyrights
1:
356:22:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
336:16:24, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
326:14:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
295:22:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
115:page would continue to go to
58:reminds (I think the name of
280:03:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
255:13:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
238:13:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
220:09:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
190:15:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
173:) should be changed to "see
165:13:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
128:05:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
99:03:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
84:00:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
31:18:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
229:page that is summarized on
372:
231:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
179:MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning
154:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
150:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
117:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
72:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
51:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
75:start trying to trim it.
91:Knowledge (XXG):Reusers
60:Knowledge (XXG):Reusers
331:Thanks. Nice work. –
175:Reusing our content
171:MediaWiki:Copyright
275:other way around.
160:. Sound right? –
70:?). In my view,
363:
371:
370:
366:
365:
364:
362:
361:
360:
303:
265:
204:
38:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
369:
367:
359:
358:
339:
338:
302:
299:
298:
297:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
241:
240:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
133:
132:
131:
130:
102:
101:
37:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
368:
357:
354:
350:
346:
341:
340:
337:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
300:
296:
293:
289:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
272:
268:
262:
256:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
213:
209:
202:Quick comment
201:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
129:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:
104:
103:
100:
97:
92:
88:
87:
86:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
35:
33:
32:
29:
19:
344:
314:
306:
304:
273:
269:
266:
205:
112:
39:
25:
66:; perhaps,
307:local copy
301:Reusing...
109:Copyrights
89:Note that
349:Superm401
288:Superm401
246:Maybe at
183:Superm401
121:Superm401
77:Superm401
263:Fair Use
56:template
345:However
333:Quadell
235:Quadell
162:Quadell
96:Quadell
28:Quadell
277:Nareek
212:WP:PD
36:Focus
16:<
353:Talk
323:Lupo
292:Talk
252:Lupo
217:Lupo
187:Talk
125:Talk
119:).
113:edit
81:Talk
45:and
315:not
156:or
351:-
290:-
250:?
185:-
123:-
79:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.