1402:. I also noticed nearly 10000 characters went missing but because the list type was changed it's difficult to figure out exactly what went missing. If you think a substantial part of the content should be removed it would be advisable to discuss that first and it would be inappropriate to do the removal in an edit with the edit summary "ordered list". It appears though that it was simply the bottom part of the page that indiscriminately went missing so I suspect the content removal was accidental. I'm not sure we should convert the page to a numbered list, numbered lists make more sense when the amount matters (like for a vote count) or when the order is fixed (like the results of a race). The page has grown fairly long so perhaps we could subdivide in sections somehow. —
627:, which makes it more than likely that this change was as as result of his research. Also, while there is not absolute proof that the website originally cited by USGS was based on a Knowledge hoax, no sources have been found that predate the relevant Knowledge posting and the USGS page supports the conclusion that the harvest festival claim is spurious. We do not need absolute proof to criminal justice standards, we can exercise editorial judgement. I suspect the evidence is stronger evidence than for many of the incidents listed here and I think it merits mention.
917:
on what they may be finding outside, perhaps referencing the places with misinformation as having copied from
Knowledge? Without such comments, it seems unlikely that the misinformation will damp out. And if we know about such issues, should we list them on the WP page here, or only the "well-documented" ones that have already been externally discussed? As example, look up Sir Malcolm Thornhill, who made the first
259:
should include complete references to the 3 stages of citogenesis: 1) The first version of the
Knowledge article with the false claim and no citation, 2) The source that used the false claim (presumably with reference to Knowledge) and 3) The version of the Knowledge article that cited that source for the claim. It shouldn't be too difficult to find all of these links for a genuine example of citogenesis. --
1398:, I undid your edit but please do try to improve the page in smaller increments. I did see some improvements in your edit but because the same edit changed the list type the diff is almost impossible to review. I did spot at least one character error, some archive links went missing (never a good idea even if the site is currently up, downtime can happen and some sites may suffer from
1630:"Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd." Meanwhile, people with true knowledge tended to underestimate their competence.
21:
1555:
We recently did some digging on the term "Free
Territory", the title for the article on the Makhnovshchina that was used from 2006 to 2019, and discovered that the term has absolutely zero basis in any English or Russian language sources. We uncovered a clear-cut case of citogenesis, as the term made
1113:
occurs and a
Knowledge has added the circular citation to the Knowledge article in question? I suspect most of the entries on the list (which appear to mostly document Knowledge hoaxes that were picked up by third parties) were never actually attributed to said circular sources on-wiki (at least, the
103:
here on WP dates from 2005, but there's been a 'citation needed' flag since at least 2013 (before then, it was sourced to
Encyclopedia Brittanica, which makes no reference of the 'Roman Law' at all). I've seen the same 'tradition' referenced on any number of wedding-related websites, but none of them
1579:
We're currently in the process of attempting to clean up the damage, but the term has been associated with the subject for long enough that it has taken on a life of its own. We're not even sure how the term was originally came up with, as the user that originally created the page in 2006 was banned
855:
and I regret having been part of its progress (in my defense, not then knowing that it was original research). This having been nearly six years ago, I think I've quite painfully learned my lesson to shoot first and ask questions later when it comes to uncited and not obviously citable material. m(_
2113:
Ok also confirmed. Life is peachy is affected. since around 2013 the worldwide sales have been listed as 6 million. im too tired for this shit man. but ive mentioned above that it had only sold 3 million by 2009. what 3 million kids birthed bought albums in the dead era of albums??? fucking mental,
916:
The "unreasonable effectiveness" of
Knowledge at spreading made-up misinformation is distressing sometimes. Besides fixing the references and documenting the problem on article talk pages, is there anything we should do, in the article perhaps, to alert readers that the article has had this effect
850:
for group 14, listed by W. B. Jensen, never seems to have gotten any following), so evidently chemists now feel the need for such a term. In this sense this is a rather benign example of citogenesis (if it is one, which seems to be rather likely), similar to the numbering of video game generations,
258:
This list has grown quite a bit recently - has anybody got any good ideas for organising the examples clearly? Also, I think we need to be clear about real examples of citogenesis rather than just examples of reputable outlets citing false claims from
Knowledge. To combat this I think each example
167:
I just came here because I came to the same conclusion. This isn't an example of "citogenesis", but an example of "trend setting". Dividing historical progress into sections (generations) isn't a reproduction of facts in form of words, but a creation which can be adapted or not. In this case it is
147:
of video game consoles is not really an example of citogenesis, but rather of unintentional original research (though perhaps necessary, in an IAR sense). This seems very different from the other examples listed here, though there may be parallels with
Knowledge accidental trailblazing in other
1117:
If the entries on the list are actually all cases where the
Knowledge-based sources were actually cited for the content in question, shouldn't the list say as much and be required to cite a reliable source that explicitly supports it, per the "well-documented" bit at the top? Or, since this is a
1108:
after having contacted the author of the "reliable source" in question and received not a "Yeah, I probably just got it from
Knowledge" but rather an "I don't remember where I got it", but then I noticed the "well-documented" part and decided against. That being said, isn't it really only
1345:
I would like to report a possible case of citogenesis on the Catalan and the Italian Knowledge related to the name of the Playboy Bunnies (while on the other Wikipedias, like the English one where it originated, the information is simply unsourced, but it could happen easily even there).
1146:
When looking on the talk page for the recently deceased, I noticed a debate since 2006 that Trebek's middle name is "Suka". Suka is the Ukrainian word for bitch. Trebek's father was Ukrainian. I think we can safely assume this was vandalism. However, it's been included on pages on
1622:
Though many people have noticed this, it was rigorously demonstrated in a series of experiments performed by Justin Kruger and David Dunning, then both of Cornell University. Their results were published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in December, 1999.
104:
offer any evidence or citation, and the substantially similar phrasing leads me to believe they picked it up from here. Given the lack of evidence over a 10-year span, I'm deleting that part of the section, but I wonder if we could pursue this as another citogenesis case.
2194:
moving and revising it. It appears incidents here in which something became real are usually cited to external sources showing that it was Knowledge that caused it. Shouldn't we really try to find external sources showing that Knowledge's use of the transgender flag
1856:
on the same day. I can't find any sources published prior to these edits that verify the claim. After the edit, the term started to appear in theses by students who seem to have consulted Knowledge. I am removing the term from the articles as a probable case of
1118:
WP-space page that doesn't necessarily require reliable third-party sourcing, could we just add cases that have not necessarily been picked up by third-party sources but were established by consensus among Knowledge editors to be bona-fide cases of citogenesis?
1957:
put this as 10 million sales. NO CITATION WHATSOEVER. Since then, it has been WIDELY repeated. For example: in Kerrang's 666 album's special edition magazine, published in november 2011, and in Many others you can search. This is very VERY FUCKING BAD.
1626:
Their study involved giving people tests of their knowledge in various domains, then asking them how they thought they did. People at the bottom of the results tended to hugely overestimate their abilities. As Dunning and Kruger noted,
1693:
Probably it didn't "propagate" except by its creator, since he says "In 2005, I copied this text onto Knowledge." Still WP is not where it appeared first. Also, it is not unusual to refer to effects pointed out by authors this way.
871:
P.S. Given that most references still seem to use the term in its well-attested earlier and unrelated meanings, I think that this is probably salvageable; I have removed references to it as a term, except as a rare alternative name in
290:, which links directly back to the lead. These sources have remained despite criticism during an AfD, and are significant in establishing Notability. Others with the same issue have been removed, though not, it seems, for citogenesis.
951:. Knowledge cannot singlehandedly eliminate ignorance, let alone stupidity. We can and do help a lot with the ignorance part of the problem, but there's a certain amount of uncertainty involved, and we can't eliminate that either.
168:
adapted from wikipedia. There was no "wrong source" which was cited, and where the citation was used as a reference for the wrong source. There just wasn't a wrong source at all, just an effort to classify video game consoles. --
1883:
This is not particularly notable because it didn't spread very far, but there was a mishap in the article on the upcoming film that stood for almost a year and was picked up by a few minor media outlets. Here's how it happened:
61:
784:
1644:
In 2005, I copied this text onto Knowledge. Knowledge likely played a role in the popularization of these expressions, but the term was not first used here, nor should user 'Vaughn' be credited with the "effect" variation.
474:
This isn't exactly an example of citogenesis, but it's related, and example of Knowledge nonsense leaking out into the real world, and it was suggested to me that you folks would want to hear about it. Since 2012 our
1618:
Dunning-Kruger Syndrome is the phenomenon whereby people who have little knowledge systematically think that they know more than others who have much more knowledge. In a phrase, clueless people think they are smart.
47:
I saw Roger Moore had recently been added to this page, I can't find a reference to it in the source. Googleing doesn't provide any references to back up the citogenesis story. I did however find several references
772:
which did indeed have a real reference (Greenwood and Earnshaw, 2nd edition, p. 227). However, I am now increasingly doubtful that such references ever existed: the one source I can find predating 2012 for it is a
1114:
cited sources probably don't verify that much), unlike the above example where the original Knowledge edit was tracked down in direct response to the circular reference being cited in the Knowledge article.
958:
to insert spin into our articles. It is already very powerful, and you ain't seen nothin' yet. Again, that's not just our problem, but the only long-term solution I know is to use it ourselves. Scary stuff.
739:
of the periodic table), most especially since I appear to have unwittingly gotten involved in its chain of transmission via assuming a little too much good faith. The article on group 14 was created on
2038:
having 14 million worldwide sales this also makes no sense when you consider in said "Got the Life" book that "Life is Peachy" had only sold 3 million copies worldwide by the point of writing. (see:
335:
I'm not sure whether or not this reference is adequate, I've had limited experience using the content of stand-up comedy routines. I found a transcript of the relevant section of the show
713:
466:
is the Northern Echo article from September 2014. The original insert was January 2014 and I can find no source earlier than the Northern Echo. so it does appear to be citogenesis.
1891:, a user added properly-sourced information regarding filming at the Essex County Isolation Hospital in Belleville, N.J., but introduced a wikilink which was incorrectly piped to
2202:
After all, we wouldn't to start any possibly inaccurate claims on this page; on the other hand, if true, this would be one of the most culturally impactful cases of citogenesis.
1473:
1739:
1484:, and a handful of other places. I don't know if this is notable enough for this list so I won't add it without input from others. But I thought I should document it here.
1293:
325:
208:
1804:
1917:
will reveal that a number of sources have since echoed the claim that principal photography for the film took place in Cedar Grove, the most prominent one being
777:
from 2009–2010 (and, this postdating 2006, and having an organisation with a French name as an assignee, this may after all be traced back to the French entry).
287:
119:
This is quite likely misinformation (at least in the form it was stated), but appears not to be an actual case of citogenesis - see the ongoing discussion at
1674:
I propose we have a look first whether the appearance on Everything2 actually led to any propagation prior to 2005 and the term's appearance on Knowledge. --
1710:
to describe the creation of "reliable" sources through circular reporting. This is a list of some well-documented cases where Knowledge has been the source.
2199:
its adoption to include it here, rather than merely circumstantial evidence? Or at least soften the wording to indicate that it is not completely certain?
1230:
1990:
this may be w follow the leader, idk search smth like (korn "14 million" "follow the leader") see what you get imma investigate to confirm my suspicions.
1022:
1266:), and so said she was born in 1981, but she was 17 in 2000, citing two different RS. This set of figures was then reported by a few media outlets (e.g.
716:, the addition of “Stanley Wotherington” to the article might be a citogenesis incident since all sources came after the name’s addition to the article.
1225:
Removed via bot. I think this should be an exception to the blanket rule of no NFCC on policy pages (since this is an image about Knowledge policy and
1208:
I've added it; seems like the exception that proves the rule: the source is about this sort of administrative list and policy page as much as anything.
948:
940:
as their main source of backstory. These days, it's probably Knowledge for both news reporters and website writers, so we've inherited the problem.
654:
184:
26:
1270:) which didn't seem to notice the discrepancy, and nearly made it back into Knowledge before the RS underlying the birth year was corrected.
828:
didn't use to mean it, it now really does mean "the elements of group 14". And it did fill what was previously an odd lexical gap (the names
801:(2014): "More recently, the carbon atom substitution was pushed further and the next crystallogen element, germanium, attracted attention..."
498:, and harvest-related names were chosen for some of Ceres’ geographical features. A mountain near Ceres’ north pole is now officially named
36:
intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to other pages.
1767:
1751:
1469:
546:: I just received email from USGS that they agree with my assessment and that they are changing the name of the mountain to Yamor Mons. —
1520:
surely helps propel the term's spread.) It may actually make its way into the "Terms that became real" section of the essay, eventually.
1468:. There was no evidence of the word "Sproftacchel" before it was added to Knowledge. Although the word hasn't become mainstream it has
1263:
80:. I didn't just remove the claim because none of these which are dated predate the alleged date of April 2007. Should it be removed?
1267:
386:
intent is. It's not absurd, it's not a dig at me unless ... unless hitching around the pacific rim is some kind of sexual innuendo
450:
provide a reference so they can see I wasn't making it up.' But do you know where that reference takes you to? The Northern Echo!
1763:
1747:
780:
Now, on the other hand, you will find lots and lots of references to this term in a multitude of reliable sources, for example:
354:
and I ... I thought that Knowledge would, right?. So, basically someone said "oh what year did you do such-and-such a thing in?"
286:. While arguably reliable sources do cite the report, the report itself is citing Knowledge for its graphs. The lead also cites
1606:
Both "Dunning Kruger Effect" and "Dunning Kruger Syndrome" had been used at Everything2 years before they appeared on Knowledge
1541:
1421:
conversion. I agree, ordered list might not make sense, but helped with count at least. I'm not sure how it could be split up.
1329:
1924:
Hopefully this demonstrates the danger in copying information without verifying it, by Knowledge editors and the media alike.
687:
confirm their involvement in the project at the convention. One of these reports was used on Knowledge to cite that the actor
2005:
1722:
1684:
1129:
979:
617:
1633:
This phenomenon manifests itself in all walks of life, and is surely familiar to users of Usenet and IRC discussion groups.
1159:
among others. This is a clear sign that sometimes Knowledge is not for the public good when a "fact" is born from a vandal.
764:
that September, assuming that there were references for it elsewhere that were not online; on that basis I also added it to
454:
You've got a lie chasing a lie, chasing a lie, around the world forevermore. And the more people who believe that, the truer
446:
They've added a footnote. Someone's basically gone 'Someone's taken my fact out. I'm going to put that back in and I'm gonna
611:
says "Name changed from Ysolo Mons on December 7, 2016, to correct an error." This is a reliable source. This date matches
1816:
1516:
yet, there are multiple google hits, image matches, etc. all using the term completely uncritically and unironically. (An
851:
as it filled a gap and was found useful by reliable sources (furthermore, it is etymologically sound). Still, it violated
813:(2015): "Silicon belongs to the crystallogen family and is the most abundant element in the earth's crust after oxygen..."
507:
422:& so has at least 1 newspaper" and within 5 minutes, 10 minutes people were telling me about other places where it was
406:
hitchhiked around the pacific rim countries. and I ... I haven't but that's a ... that's a Darlington Newspaper with about
818:
418:
Basically saying "I've never hitchhiked around the pacific rim countries,I've just discovered that Knowledge says I have.
1892:
1164:
676:
442:
alerted me to the fact that that fact had been reinstated. Someone's gone and put it back in. But this time... this time
321:
891:
463:
434:
just been deleted, I assume he was the person who had deleted it. So I went to look at the page and sure enough, it had
426:
being cited as a fact. Right, that is a Radio Interview website and that is a...a Cambridge Newspaper both of them have
414:
how Knowledge works. I... I thought I'd mention it on Twitter, see if I could discover more, so I... I sent out a tweet
220:
1931:
1495:
696:
521:
430:
repeated the idea that I've hitchhiked around the Pacific Rim. Then I get a tweet from someone telling me that it has
402:
And they were writing something nice about this show as it goes, but in there they have repeated as a fact that I have
382:
they're being satirical. You understand where that has come from. But in that case, it's not obvious where the satiric
1376:
about a possible citogenesis issue. It'd be helpful if we could get an extra set of eyes on this discussion. Thanks.
1355:
1080:
936:
It is of course not just a Knowledge problem, it existed before the Internet, as newspaper reporters (once) used the
845:
795:(2015): "At this temperature, crystallogen sulfides (ie sulfur with element of the carbon group) are quite volatile";
49:
2021:
On 14 January 2011, an I.P. User changes the sales figure to twelve million, same citation. it is obviously wrong. (
390:
that I've ... i've never heard of and weirdly now that I've just said that, it is. But...But I thought well if I use
374:
for satirical effect, like Recently I saw on Bobby Davro's Knowledge page that he was best known for his work as the
2012:
1787:
referring to Russian territory including Vladivostok, etc originates with the 2004 creation of English Knowledge's
1588:
1179:
760:(then already an established editor, and after all previously an industrial chemist) in June 2012. I added it as a
438:
been removed from my page. So I...I left it. I just moved on with my life. Except a couple of days later Mrs Gorman
246:
2039:
1808:
1305:
1259:
1076:
476:
410:
30,000 Readers. That's 30,000 potential Darlingtonians who think I've actually done that. Now I don't really know
378:
inventor of Bovril. Right, now ... you know that's not true. You know someone's being funny, they're being silly,
1866:
1812:
721:
655:
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/363654/specific-words-for-narrow-and-fat-ends-of-eggs/363655#363655
653:
This Knowledge hoax seems to have propagated into a 2012 article in the Research Journal of Poultry Sciences:
358:
Right? so I'm trying to find this on my Knowledge page and what I found is that on my Knowledge page it says...
264:
109:
73:
53:
370:
Sounds quite nice, but I didn't do it. Now I understand, sometimes people vandalise Knowledge pages for fun or
1160:
683:
confirm or deny their involvement in a project. Six months later two journalists report that the voice actor
317:
2011:
this revision, dated 31 december 2010. cites reggi arvisu's "got the life" book, and is factually correct. (
1899:
1888:
985:
955:
398:
just to see if I could find anyone repeating this fallacy as a truth. And I found this in the Northern Echo.
394:
Knowledge as a reference I'm sure other people do as well so I googled my name and pacific rim and hitchhike
2035:
And there you have it folks: citogenesis confirmed. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
1229:). But more importantly to anyone watching this page: I have yet to hear back from xkcd and the image is
807:(2013): "where A is larger alkaline earth or rare earth cations, B is smaller crystallogen or pnictogen..."
458:
it gets. At some point they should just start saying "I had a really great time" i mean "It was wonderful"
1927:
1877:
1853:
1831:
1381:
1351:
1347:
1312:
1152:
1061:
899:
881:
873:
861:
706:
692:
2254:
2234:
2227:
2210:
2183:
2163:
2159:
2149:
2145:
2129:
2125:
2102:
2098:
2085:
2081:
2068:
2064:
2051:
2047:
1999:
1995:
1985:
1981:
1967:
1963:
1935:
1870:
1820:
1771:
1755:
1726:
1703:
1688:
1669:
1654:
1600:
1529:
1499:
1447:
1443:
1430:
1411:
1407:
1385:
1373:
1359:
1334:
1279:
1245:
1220:
1202:
1168:
1156:
1134:
1093:
1065:
1033:
1015:
989:
968:
930:
903:
885:
865:
725:
700:
666:
636:
632:
590:
573:
555:
537:
299:
268:
248:
239:
196:
177:
161:
149:
132:
113:
89:
366:
And that is a thing that hasn't happened. I'm pretty sure I would remember if I'd done that, obviously.
362:"Gorman took a break from stand-up to undertake a sponsored hitchhike around the pacific rim countries"
792:
279:
1845:
1584:
1417:
Sorry, don't know what happened, glad page length made something obviously wrong. I only intended on
1057:
495:
283:
1660:
This seems convincing to me. I suggest we just remove mention of this being a case of citogenesis.
1862:
1569:
1465:
1399:
1324:
717:
623:
295:
260:
105:
85:
789:(2015), published by Wiley-VCH and referencing "Properties of Crystallogens (group 14)" on p. 106;
1849:
1836:
1717:
1699:
1679:
1665:
1596:
1544:, we've recently been having a discussion about citogenesis as it pertains to articles about the
1262:: the Knowledge article had an erroneous birth year (separately, Knowledge also had an erroneous
1126:
1029:
981:
926:
840:
for groups 15, 16, and 17 are IUPAC-approved, and Greenwood and Earnshaw lists the proposed name
798:
564:
and an email you received is not a reliable source, nor is your statement that you received it.
1517:
1285:
741:
57:
2250:
2233:
The addition of that flag to this list was completely unsourced and attributed to a Knowledge
1565:
1549:
1525:
1426:
1377:
964:
895:
877:
857:
757:
662:
586:
551:
533:
491:
187:, as it makes more sense now that there is a section to give entries like this some context.--
173:
77:
1045:
804:
2155:
2141:
2121:
2094:
2077:
2060:
2043:
1991:
1977:
1959:
1366:
1011:
1003:
944:
628:
569:
216:
192:
157:
128:
31:
753:
2221:
2204:
2029:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Follow_the_Leader_(Korn_album)&oldid=439709121)
2023:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Follow_the_Leader_(Korn_album)&oldid=407751765)
2017:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Follow_the_Leader_(Korn_album)&oldid=405086100)
1800:
1788:
1784:
1777:
1491:
1301:
1275:
1148:
1088:
810:
313:
120:
2092:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Follow_the_Leader_(Korn_album)&oldid=407751765
2075:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Follow_the_Leader_(Korn_album)&oldid=405086100
2058:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Follow_the_Leader_(Korn_album)&oldid=439709121
1953:
have been misreported thanks to citogenesis incident. In July 2011, this unsourced edit (
1573:
1002:
WP editor inserts random statistic about Casio's F-91W watch. Factoid gets picked up by
2114:
im saying dumb shit due to tiredness. Let me grab the url that started this shit again.
1650:
1545:
1461:
1318:
350:
Basically, somebody had asked me a question about myself, and I didn't know the answer.
291:
81:
1955:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Korn_(album)&diff=prev&oldid=438876714)
1637:
342:
I...I know from my own experience that Knowledge isn't always the most reliable source
1713:
1695:
1675:
1661:
1592:
1121:
1025:
922:
918:
852:
578:
I thought you'd be interested, and you might want to follow it up yourselves. (Also:
505:
144:
69:
2246:
2241:
I hope no articles were written via that premise in the last 23 days, otherwise we
2154:
im sorry i havent slept well, wikipedia readers gonna have a seizure fr fr. sorry.
1950:
1587:
requirements for this article, as the citogenesis has yet to be reported on by any
1521:
1435:
1422:
1395:
1239:
1214:
1196:
960:
774:
736:
658:
612:
608:
582:
579:
561:
547:
529:
525:
520:
The hoax entry seems to have spread from Knowledge to a single-sentence mention in
503:
169:
824:
I think it's too late to do anything now about this; for better or worse, even if
346:
Recently I was looking myself up, on Knowledge. not in a horribly egotistical way.
1709:
1708:
The definition of citogenesis given at the top of the list says the term is used
1044:
A user on Twitter has claimed that the Pringles mascot's name is Julius Pringles
238:
is another example of citogenesis. All roads appear to lead back to Knowledge. --
2013:
https://archive.org/details/gotlifemyjourney00fiel_0/page/118/mode/2up?q=million
1910:
Cedar Grove remained in the lede until I removed it today after this discovery.
1858:
1848:, added the term "structure-proposition-evaluation (SPE) method" to the article
1512:"Sproftacchel" has now been documented here, and while I agree it hasn't become
1477:
1140:
1007:
996:
937:
565:
305:
212:
188:
153:
124:
2040:
https://archive.org/details/gotlifemyjourney00fiel_0/page/82/mode/2up?q=million
1110:
1507:
1486:
1297:
1271:
1083:
100:
514:
1646:
1580:
as a sockpuppet, so right now we only have vague hypotheses on its origin.
1185:
714:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 18#Stanley Wotherington
486:: festival marking the first day of harvest of eggplants in Tirana, Albania
235:
1906:
Principal photography took place in Los Angeles, New York, and Cedar Grove
679:. Anonymous contributor to Knowledge claims a voice actor at a convention
2136:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Life_Is_Peachy&oldid=477600382
2119:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Life_Is_Peachy&oldid=439708771
1072:
2219:
it, which is probably much safer to do for now, unless sources turn up.
1481:
1311:
A more concise description of the concerns may now also be found at the
65:
1974:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Korn_(album)&oldid=438876714
1918:
1799:. Check this out! Maybe an entry here would read in part: "* The term "
1796:
1236:
1211:
1193:
2056:
THE FUCKING URLS ARENT CO OPERATING FUCK. This is the 14 million one.
1840:
the unsourced sentence "The method presented is sometimes called the
560:
That is happy for you but not use-able in WP. We work here based on
2027:
On 16 July 2011, an I.P. user ups that sales figure to 14 million. (
1260:
Talk:Ilhan Omar/Archive_9#Semi-protected_edit_request_on_28_May_2019
921:
in 1817, as you can verify in multiple books and tons of web pages.
691:
confirm or deny their involvement in the project at the convention.
2117:
Ok so this ip user added "4 million" no citiation on 16 July 2011.
1190:
could we get a relicense of this strip to include it on the page?)
1761:
1591:, so for now I'm cataloguing the discovery here in the talk page.
1946:
1460:
I found what I believe to be an instance of citogenesis in the
1456:
Citogenesis of "Sproftacchel" for pictures you put your head in
1046:
because they "named him on Knowledge in 2006 and it caught on".
524:, a November 2013 blog entry. From there it made its way into
185:
Knowledge:List of citogenesis incidents#Terms that became real
15:
1792:
1712:
There is no requirement for Knowledge to have been first.
649:
The two ends of an egg are named the aerus and the taglion
2216:
2191:
2187:
2184:
Talk:Transgender_flag#Origin_of_popularity_is_Wikipedia
2135:
2134:
the 6 million bit was added here, on 18 February 2012.
2118:
2091:
2074:
2057:
2028:
2022:
2016:
1973:
1954:
1557:
1226:
1105:
1051:
765:
761:
1740:
Possible false quote on the Bob Marley Knowledge page
1561:
282:
which cite an article by private company/web scraper
99:
Saw this pop up on reddit, and did some digging. The
1803:" became popularized in the late 2000s (reference: "
1638:
https://everything2.com/title/Dunning-Kruger+Effect
744:by an anonymous IP in January 2006 with the title
1783:Hey, I came to the conclusion on Wiktionary that
735:I am a bit worried about this term (used to mean
1294:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hitchens's razor
522:International Harvest Festivals and Celebrations
2008:is citogenesis. so, let me present a timeline.
1902:, a user then added this sentence to the lede:
954:Of more concern to me is the inevitable use of
502:, after this spurious eggplant festival. (See
337:
1941:Korn album sales on s/t and follow the leader.
1913:Using your preferred search engine to look up
677:Talk:Samurai_Jack_(season_5)#Circular_sourcing
139:History of video game consoles - a sui generis
1904:
1826:Structure-proposition-evaluation (SPE) method
1438:, maybe by year or by decade or something. —
1024:; look for the second story on the webpage.--
766:this illustration of trivial names for groups
8:
2237:on a Talk page that began with the sentence
1976:this revision, i mean, dated july 11, 2011.
1548:, a Ukrainian anarchist movement during the
1372:There's a discussion currently occurring at
1562:dozens of Wikipedias in different languages
1258:A case of near-citogenesis is discussed at
278:The list on Knowledge has frequently cited
1610:In 2002, I made this post at Everything2:
316:. How do we confirm one way or the other?
1227:directly led to the creation of this page
1071:There's now two cites for this, from the
949:User:Andrewa/if the rocket's gonna crash
27:Knowledge:List of citogenesis incidents
2238:
1842:Structure-Proposition-Evaluation (SPE)
1558:hundreds of English Knowledge articles
2090:and finally the 14 january 2011 one.
1834:(25 March 2007) added to the article
230:I'm beginning to highly suspect that
7:
2042:). Thats a fucking insane jump. No.
1464:article. I provided evidence on the
2073:the correct one, 31 december 2010.
1915:"joker: folie a deux" "cedar grove"
1348:I explained everithing in the talk
1050:This story does in fact appear to
615:postings on this talk page and at
509:.) The mountain itself (which is
274:Selfie-related Injuries and Deaths
14:
1572:) and has even popped up in some
95:Bridesmaids ward off evil spirits
2245:have a new case of citogenesis!
768:in February 2013, together with
19:
2239:"This is my personal anecdote."
2004:OK so definitely 14 million on
1536:Citogenesis of "Free Territory"
943:IMO the solution is to promote
143:I would say the "generational"
1472:afterwards. It was used in an
1264:year for her arrival in the US
912:Are there things we should do?
618:Talk:List of harvest festivals
479:has the following hoax entry:
70:Durham university accomodation
1:
1871:18:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
1530:01:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
1448:03:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
1431:23:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
1412:23:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
1386:15:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
1221:22:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
1203:22:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
1135:07:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
748:, which translates indeed to
737:chemical elements in group 14
726:21:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
667:14:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
538:02:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
326:06:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
304:
249:22:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
221:19:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
211:of citogenesis in the wild!--
178:20:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
162:18:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
133:17:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
90:21:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
2190:diff adding it here, and my
1936:01:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
1893:Essex County Hospital Center
1793:Wiktionary's Outer Manchuria
1169:20:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
1066:21:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
821:courtesy of Google Scholar.
701:21:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
637:20:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
591:19:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
574:18:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
556:17:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
494:photographed the surface of
202:
197:02:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
62:Durham University powerpoint
2182:See this brief discussion (
1727:09:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
1704:03:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
1689:14:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
1670:11:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
1655:06:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
1518:urban dictionary definition
1360:09:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
1335:22:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
1306:00:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
1100:Is this really citogenesis?
1021:Link to a relevant article
969:20:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
300:09:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
121:Talk:Bridesmaid#Citogenesis
66:Durham university newspaper
2271:
1844:method." The same editor,
1772:20:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
1756:07:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
1280:01:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
1094:05:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
990:19:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
269:10:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
183:I have re-added it now in
74:Interview with roger moore
2255:02:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
2228:02:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
2211:02:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
1809:Google Books Ngram Viewer
1601:17:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
1583:Not sure if it meets the
1246:19:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
1182:. (But just in case, hey
1174:Including the comic here?
1034:00:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
1016:23:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
904:14:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
892:asked on French Knowledge
886:13:43, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
866:14:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
526:the official nomenclature
477:list of harvest festivals
114:23:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
2164:23:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2150:23:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2130:23:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2103:23:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2086:23:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2069:23:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2052:23:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
2000:22:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
1986:22:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
1968:22:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
1821:20:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
1500:22:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
1365:Possible citogenesis at
931:04:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
844:for group 13 on p. 227;
54:Durham student newspaper
2140:Citogenesis confirmed.
2015:) Arvisu 2009, p. 119 (
1945:The worldwide sales of
1900:Special:Diff/1148414227
1889:Special:Diff/1146973693
1178:I believe it satisfies
956:artificial intelligence
786:Micro Energy Harvesting
513:a hoax) now appears in
203:Einstein's ghost parade
2178:Transgender pride flag
1908:
1854:Special:Diff/117771696
1832:Special:Diff/117773837
1284:
874:group (periodic table)
461:
236:Microaggression theory
209:possible rare spotting
1895:in Cedar Grove, N.J.
1614:Dunning-Kruger Effect
1542:WikiProject Anarchism
1374:Talk:Lipstick lesbian
1104:I was tempted to add
331:Dave Gorman reference
150:lumpers and splitters
1746:For the interested.
1570:Ukrainian Wikipedias
1341:Playboy Bunnies name
1004:several news sources
707:Stanley Wotherington
1878:Joker: Folie à Deux
1813:Geographyinitiative
1313:article's talk page
624:Talk:List of hoaxes
490:Last year the NASA
242:MurderByDeletionism
58:Durham Student page
1850:Reading (activity)
1837:How to Read a Book
1764:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1748:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1574:scholarly writings
1161:Unknown Temptation
754:English Wiktionary
101:original reference
76:(not a quote) and
2006:Follow the Leader
1928:SaintPaulOfTarsus
1725:
1687:
1550:Russian Civil War
1474:NZ Herald article
1231:up for discussion
1132:
1109:"citogenesis" if
1091:
693:BrightRoundCircle
515:Italian Knowledge
318:Grand'mere Eugene
40:
39:
2262:
2226:
2209:
1951:1994 debut album
1916:
1876:Citogenesis re:
1720:
1716:
1711:
1682:
1678:
1589:reliable sources
1511:
1441:
1405:
1367:Lipstick lesbian
1333:
1327:
1321:
1292:Please refer to
1286:Hitchens's razor
1244:
1242:
1219:
1217:
1201:
1199:
1189:
1125:
1087:
945:critical reading
752:, as created on
742:French Knowledge
712:As explained at
562:reliable sources
308:'s 2nd daughter?
78:Durham newspaper
23:
22:
16:
2270:
2269:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2220:
2203:
2180:
1943:
1914:
1898:April 2023: In
1887:March 2023: In
1881:
1828:
1805:Outer Manchuria
1801:Outer Manchuria
1789:Outer Manchuria
1785:Outer Manchuria
1781:
1778:Outer Manchuria
1744:
1718:
1680:
1641:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1608:
1564:(including the
1538:
1505:
1482:an ebay listing
1458:
1439:
1403:
1393:
1370:
1343:
1325:
1319:
1316:
1290:
1256:
1240:
1234:
1215:
1209:
1197:
1191:
1183:
1176:
1144:
1102:
1042:
1040:Julius Pringles
1000:
977:
914:
733:
710:
674:
651:
472:
460:
333:
314:this discussion
310:
276:
256:
228:
205:
141:
97:
45:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2268:
2266:
2258:
2257:
2235:user's comment
2186:), as well as
2179:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2138:
2115:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2036:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2025:
2019:
1942:
1939:
1880:
1874:
1863:Biogeographist
1827:
1824:
1797:Citations page
1780:
1775:
1743:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1643:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1604:
1546:Makhnovshchina
1537:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1478:art exhibition
1462:Photo stand-in
1457:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1392:
1389:
1369:
1363:
1352:Martin Mystère
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1289:
1283:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1175:
1172:
1143:
1138:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
999:
993:
976:
973:
972:
971:
952:
941:
913:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
815:
814:
808:
802:
796:
790:
732:
729:
718:LaundryPizza03
709:
704:
673:
670:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
613:Mark Dominus's
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
488:
487:
471:
468:
457:
455:
453:
451:
449:
447:
445:
443:
441:
439:
437:
435:
433:
431:
429:
427:
425:
423:
421:
419:
417:
415:
413:
411:
409:
407:
405:
403:
401:
399:
397:
395:
393:
391:
389:
387:
385:
383:
381:
379:
377:
375:
373:
371:
369:
367:
365:
363:
361:
359:
357:
355:
353:
351:
349:
347:
345:
343:
341:
338:
332:
329:
309:
303:
275:
272:
261:ChrisSampson87
255:
254:Article layout
252:
227:
224:
204:
201:
200:
199:
166:
140:
137:
136:
135:
106:PublicolaMinor
96:
93:
44:
41:
38:
37:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2267:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2225:
2224:
2218:
2213:
2212:
2208:
2207:
2200:
2198:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2177:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2137:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2076:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2024:
2020:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2009:
2007:
2003:
2002:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1940:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1901:
1896:
1894:
1890:
1885:
1879:
1875:
1873:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1838:
1833:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1741:
1738:
1728:
1724:
1721:
1715:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1683:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1639:
1615:
1611:
1605:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1581:
1577:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1556:its way into
1553:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1488:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1455:
1449:
1445:
1437:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1401:
1397:
1390:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1368:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1328:
1322:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1287:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1253:
1247:
1243:
1238:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1195:
1187:
1181:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1136:
1131:
1128:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1112:
1107:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
998:
994:
992:
991:
987:
983:
980:
974:
970:
966:
962:
957:
953:
950:
946:
942:
939:
935:
934:
933:
932:
928:
924:
920:
919:cardboard box
911:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
888:
887:
883:
879:
875:
870:
869:
868:
867:
863:
859:
854:
849:
848:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
826:crystallogens
822:
820:
812:
809:
806:
803:
800:
797:
794:
791:
788:
787:
783:
782:
781:
778:
776:
775:single patent
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
746:cristallogène
743:
738:
731:Crystallogens
730:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
708:
705:
703:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
671:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
648:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:
620:
619:
614:
610:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
592:
588:
584:
580:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
518:
516:
512:
508:
506:
504:
501:
497:
493:
485:
482:
481:
480:
478:
469:
467:
465:
459:
336:
330:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
307:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:The Telegraph
285:
281:
273:
271:
270:
266:
262:
253:
251:
250:
247:
245:
244:
243:
237:
233:
225:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
180:
179:
175:
171:
164:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
145:periodization
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
116:
115:
111:
107:
102:
94:
92:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
42:
35:
33:
28:
25:
18:
17:
2242:
2222:
2214:
2205:
2201:
2196:
2181:
1944:
1926:
1923:
1912:
1909:
1905:
1897:
1886:
1882:
1852:in the edit
1841:
1835:
1829:
1782:
1759:
1745:
1642:
1613:
1609:
1582:
1578:
1554:
1539:
1513:
1485:
1470:spread a bit
1459:
1446:or ping me)
1418:
1410:or ping me)
1394:
1391:Ordered list
1378:Sideswipe9th
1371:
1344:
1291:
1257:
1177:
1145:
1120:
1116:
1103:
1056:
1049:
1043:
1001:
978:
915:
896:Double sharp
878:Double sharp
858:Double sharp
847:adamantogens
846:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
823:
816:
785:
779:
769:
758:SemperBlotto
750:crystallogen
749:
745:
734:
711:
688:
684:
680:
675:
672:Samurai Jack
659:Mark Dominus
652:
622:
616:
583:Mark Dominus
548:Mark Dominus
543:
530:Mark Dominus
519:
510:
499:
489:
483:
473:
462:
339:
334:
311:
284:Priceonomics
277:
257:
241:
240:
231:
229:
206:
165:
142:
98:
46:
34:-facing page
30:
2156:Chchcheckit
2142:Chchcheckit
2122:Chchcheckit
2095:Chchcheckit
2078:Chchcheckit
2061:Chchcheckit
2044:Chchcheckit
1992:Chchcheckit
1978:Chchcheckit
1960:Chchcheckit
1859:citogenesis
1791:page. See:
1440:Alexis Jazz
1404:Alexis Jazz
1400:geoblocking
1268:Twin Cities
1141:Alex Trebek
997:Casio F-91W
938:morgue file
629:Verbcatcher
306:Phil Knight
232:"microrape"
43:Roger Moore
2223:Crossroads
2206:Crossroads
1846:Jon Roland
1742:discussion
1585:notability
1514:mainstream
1254:Ilhan Omar
1058:Adroitwhiz
834:chalcogens
830:pnictogens
811:this paper
805:this paper
799:this paper
793:this paper
500:Ysolo Mons
470:Ysolo Mons
148:fields of
50:Ranker.com
1830:The edit
1760:Now here:
1466:talk page
1350:. Bye, --
1320:Apaugasma
1122:Hijiri 88
1111:"Step #3"
1075:article:
1052:check out
995:Nominate
842:icosagens
609:USGS page
292:Fiachaire
226:Microrape
82:SPACKlick
2215:PK-WIKI
1795:and the
1696:Dicklyon
1662:Dicklyon
1593:Grnrchst
1540:Over at
1496:contribs
1423:Tom Ruen
1180:fair use
1149:TV Guide
1081:Mashable
1073:Pringles
1026:SamHolt6
982:Benjamin
923:Dicklyon
838:halogens
819:yet more
770:icosagen
762:redirect
234:over on
2247:PK-WIKI
2217:deleted
1919:CBR.com
1714:Andreas
1676:Andreas
1566:Russian
1522:FeRDNYC
1436:Tomruen
1396:Tomruen
961:Andrewa
890:...and
817:...and
689:did not
681:did not
621:and at
280:sources
170:Aszazin
1155:, and
1008:NickCT
947:. See
853:WP:NOR
836:, and
566:Jytdog
544:Update
213:Pharos
189:Pharos
154:Pharos
125:Pharos
32:reader
2197:drove
1807:" in
1508:Jak86
1487:Jak86
1476:, an
1298:Ain92
1272:-sche
1084:Flyne
1077:Input
975:Slate
528:. —
496:Ceres
484:Ysolo
440:4:42
428:4:24
29:is a
2251:talk
2243:will
2192:diff
2188:this
2160:talk
2146:talk
2126:talk
2099:talk
2082:talk
2065:talk
2048:talk
1996:talk
1982:talk
1964:talk
1947:Korn
1932:talk
1867:talk
1817:talk
1768:talk
1752:talk
1700:talk
1666:talk
1651:talk
1647:Uucp
1597:talk
1568:and
1526:talk
1492:talk
1444:talk
1427:talk
1408:talk
1382:talk
1356:talk
1326:talk
1302:talk
1276:talk
1233:.
1186:Xkcd
1165:talk
1106:this
1089:talk
1079:and
1062:talk
1030:talk
1012:talk
986:talk
965:talk
927:talk
900:talk
882:talk
862:talk
856:_)m
722:talk
697:talk
663:talk
633:talk
607:The
587:talk
570:talk
552:talk
534:talk
492:Dawn
464:Here
456:5:13
452:5:06
448:4:58
444:4:50
436:4:36
432:4:30
424:4:17
420:4:09
416:4:03
412:3:58
408:3:51
404:3:45
400:3:40
396:3:33
392:3:26
388:3:18
384:3:11
380:3:03
376:2:55
372:2:49
368:2:42
364:2:35
360:2:28
356:2:22
352:2:14
348:2:08
344:2:02
340:1:58
322:talk
312:See
296:talk
265:talk
217:talk
193:talk
174:talk
158:talk
129:talk
110:talk
86:talk
1949:'s
1811:")
1723:466
1685:466
1576:.
1552:.
1157:ABC
1153:CNN
756:by
685:did
517:.
511:not
152:.--
123:.--
2253:)
2162:)
2148:)
2128:)
2101:)
2084:)
2067:)
2050:)
1998:)
1984:)
1966:)
1934:)
1921:.
1869:)
1861:.
1819:)
1770:)
1754:)
1719:JN
1702:)
1681:JN
1668:)
1653:)
1640:)
1599:)
1560:,
1528:)
1498:)
1494:)(
1480:,
1429:)
1419:ol
1384:)
1358:)
1317:☿
1315:.
1304:)
1296:.
1278:)
1237:SJ
1235:–
1212:SJ
1210:–
1194:SJ
1192:–
1167:)
1133:)
1130:やや
1092:)
1064:)
1054:.
1032:)
1014:)
1006:.
988:)
967:)
929:)
902:)
894:.
884:)
876:.
864:)
832:,
724:)
699:)
665:)
635:)
589:)
572:)
554:)
536:)
324:)
298:)
267:)
219:)
207:A
195:)
176:)
160:)
131:)
112:)
88:)
72:,
68:,
64:,
60:,
56:,
52:,
2249:(
2158:(
2144:(
2124:(
2097:(
2080:(
2063:(
2046:(
1994:(
1980:(
1962:(
1930:(
1865:(
1815:(
1766:(
1750:(
1698:(
1664:(
1649:(
1636:(
1595:(
1524:(
1510::
1506:@
1490:(
1442:(
1425:(
1406:(
1380:(
1354:(
1332:)
1330:☉
1323:(
1300:(
1288:?
1274:(
1241:+
1216:+
1198:+
1188::
1184:@
1163:(
1151:,
1127:聖
1124:(
1086:(
1060:(
1028:(
1010:(
984:(
963:(
925:(
898:(
880:(
860:(
720:(
695:(
661:(
657:—
631:(
585:(
581:—
568:(
550:(
532:(
320:(
294:(
263:(
215:(
191:(
172:(
156:(
127:(
108:(
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.