344:
326:
295:
1053:
460:
433:
264:
768:, who is not notable enough for his own article, to his most recent work that just came out. What's the policy or guideline on what the target of this redirect should be? He has several other credits, at least a few of which have their own articles. Presumably it should be the show he's most known for? —
707:
to make sure that if an article is created at some point the trailing redirect is redirected. I added it but it didn't work because a soft redirect isn't technically a redirect: there should be some equivalent template for cases where multiple terms, which would redirect to the same article if there
944:
I think the reasons people are asking "what is the purpose of this template?" are that its documentation is sparse and contradicts itself and that it has not been added to enough articles to allow its purpose to be inferred by looking at its
Whatlinkshere. IIRC my original suggesting was for cases
920:
proposed this template. The RfD closed as no consensus, but I thought this template could be useful to explain why these redirects are there if we're gonna keep them anyway. It happens every now and then that someone recreates the article even though the topic is not notable, so having the redirect
930:, was turned into an article (and subsequently reverted) despite having the template. However, most of these articles remain untouched since the template was added. Furthermore, I don't recall any instance of me using the category; all I've ever done is add the template and leave. ―
783:
Unless one of the articles actually says something substantive about the actor, I think it would be better to leave it as a redlink to make it clear there is no article rather than directing readers to some article that has little more than a passing mention of the actor's name.
849:. It was closed as no consensus due to low participation, with the caveat that it would be overturned to delete if this WikiProject finds the template unnecessary. As such, I'm bringing the question here: do folks think this template is needed? Best,
658:
We read below very sound explanations from revered and respected editors that you are correct. Sincerely, I was not testing you; however, if I had been testing you, then I believe you passed. I'm sorry that I off-tracked your initial question.
945:
where the real world entity was absent, rather than merely where there was not (yet) a (standalone) Knowledge (XXG) article for the entity. Readers might manually iterate through a sequence of articles and wonder why there was a gap;
809:
billing. I do suppose if he's more well-known or visible in either of the first two I would redirect to that cast list, but otherwise I concur that a redlink might be more "valuable" at this point in time.
442:. Please feel free to create a sub-page in order to branch out from this page if you wish to create a new proposal. If you do so, please leave a comment here so that other editors know of its existence!
868:
Looks like this is not a very strong issue with editors, either here or at TfD. Probably the best person to ask whether or not this rcat template should be kept is its 2022 creator, editor
913:
732:
I would just add a note on the talk page of both soft redirects. I would guess that this situation isn't all that common such that another template and tracking category are needed.
960:
148:
872:. I'm neutral on whether or not this template is necessary, but I would like to learn the details about why it was thought necessary to keep track of these gaps by sorting them to
846:
471:
255:
1113:
A discussion has been initiated regarding redirects from the draftspace to the mainspace that are not the result of a move. Interested editors are welcome to comment at
78:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
1170:
69:
1006:
Is there a color change script for redirects? I only know a gadget for disambiguations. Or was it disallowed? Because in ptwiki and eswiki there's a gadget. --
183:
51:
87:
42:
189:
60:
873:
686:
I think it makes sense to prefer the basic "ism" noun and redirect from the "ist" noun which is about a person who adheres to the "ism", as in
1258:
1221:
955:
can semi automate such iteration. Distinguishing realworld gaps from
Knowledge (XXG) gaps is important. Examples of the former would include
467:
912:
hey there! I've been quite inactive on
Knowledge (XXG) lately so I didn't notice the discussions. I created this redirect category after
949:
924:
Looking back, I don't think it made any difference. Been digging through article histories a bit and a total of one of these redirects,
701:
1093:
In particular, we could use someone who is into redirect tagging to take a look and clarify what to do, so we can settle a dispute.
372:
This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects.
351:
331:
133:
129:
33:
1217:
1064:
178:
798:
306:
169:
971:
839:
828:
393:
1033:
858:
741:
485:
1128:
1022:
263:
222:
935:
892:
675:
643:
But why would you ask me it if you're already a page mover? You know more than me. Or maybe you're testing me. --
625:
569:
463:
452:
1147:
634:
Let me comment what I perceived: WP:NOUN is often used as a reason for accepting uncontroversial request moves,
274:
1083:
1114:
583:
312:
1206:
1196:
553:. It seems that you don't consider "monosexist" to be a noun, but it is, isn't it? Why the page move, then?
546:
500:
363:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
967:) but if there is only a redirect then this Rcat is appropriate. Seldom but not never will the redirect be
1202:. I could not find a reverse counterpart to designate a redirect from the work of art to its creator. The
1115:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Drafts#Redirects from draftspace to the mainspace which are not the result of a move
609:
Where is this in WP policy that some nouns are preferred over other nouns? I don't see that at WP:NOUNS.
388:
159:
1213:
802:
343:
325:
356:
199:
174:
1231:
964:
931:
907:
879:
869:
662:
612:
556:
1155:
1079:
806:
771:
1178:
1098:
981:
815:
279:
278:
1014:
789:
651:
594:
527:
155:
582:
and not heterosexist (or monosexuality and not monosexual). But that could also be a case of
550:
360:
1243:
1239:
1225:
1182:
1159:
1136:
1102:
1087:
1037:
1029:
1016:
991:
939:
895:
862:
854:
819:
792:
777:
745:
737:
727:
678:
653:
628:
596:
572:
529:
489:
481:
276:
876:. What was gained? and what would be lost if the template and category were to be deleted?
503:. Sometimes, Wiktionary prefers one term over the other, in this case it means "Exhibiting
988:
917:
1070:
in correlation to a miscapitalization redirect pointing to the same entry. The thread is
439:
1151:
718:
17:
1252:
1174:
1094:
1071:
1057:
1045:
811:
1007:
956:
785:
765:
644:
587:
579:
540:
520:
1235:
1025:
903:
850:
733:
477:
1120:
504:
709:
1146:
You are invited to a discussion about the use of redirects in hatnotes at
916:
about exactly these redirects in
December 2021/January 2022, during which
1075:
691:
687:
963:. There are cases of realworld gaps with full non-redirect articles (eg
512:
887:
670:
620:
564:
516:
508:
549:
you mentioned that you moved "monosexist" to "monosexism" and cited
1109:
Discussion of redirects from draftspace to mainspace not from move
760:
Guideline help on redirects for non-notable actors to their work
697:
It ought to be possible to have the two soft redirects, with a
427:
381:
designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and
288:
280:
124:
111:
578:
Some nouns are preferred over the others, that's why we have
545:
just a little question: we see at the previous edit in that
1212:
is way too commercial. Any advice is appreciated. Example:
708:
was one, are currently redirecting to a
Wiktionary item.
1148:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Hatnote#Redirects in hatnotes again
926:
636:
207:
961:
Category:Events cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic
921:
itself state that it is not notable could maybe help.
519:". So I believe awomen should redirect to awoman. --
355:, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of
507:". This one can be justifiable, but in the case of
499:Are redirects to soft redirects allowed? Example:
470:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
797:Agreed; he currently has two main cast billings (
1173:that may interest editors of this WikiProject.
305:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
136:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
977:Sometimes but not always will the redirect be
473:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1234:and related work templates should work here.
8:
1171:Wikipedia_talk:Template_index/Redirect_pages
927:Turkey in the Eurovision Song Contest 1979
320:
391:redirects. For more information see the
322:
987:. This can be in the documentation.
7:
1074:. The discussion is about the topic
404:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Redirect
294:
292:
27:
1056:There is currently a discussion at
311:It is of interest to the following
25:
349:This page is within the scope of
154:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1051:
1046:Talk:Popverse#Redirect templates
458:
431:
342:
324:
293:
262:
149:Click here to start a new topic.
1244:19:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1226:19:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1165:Recommended redirect templates
1:
1169:There are recommendations at
829:Template:R from gap in series
407:Template:WikiProject Redirect
367:and see a list of open tasks.
146:Put new text under old text.
1259:Project-Class redirect pages
584:Knowledge (XXG):COMMON NAME
451:Nomination for deletion of
1275:
1183:02:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1160:16:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1137:19:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
1023:User:Anomie/linkclassifier
950:Category series navigation
764:I created a redirect from
702:R avoiding double redirect
438:This is the talk page for
197:
1103:22:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
1088:23:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
464:Template:R to sports team
453:Template:R to sports team
337:
319:
184:Be welcoming to newcomers
118:Skip to table of contents
1044:Notice of discussion at
1038:01:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
1017:01:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
992:11:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
940:20:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
896:06:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
863:15:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
820:11:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
793:14:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
778:14:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
746:15:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
728:07:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
679:18:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
654:05:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
629:05:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
597:05:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
573:05:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
530:05:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
513:Wiktionary defines it as
490:01:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
117:
1065:Avoided double redirect
501:Special:Diff/1222266997
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:RE
468:nominated for deletion
394:template documentation
179:avoid personal attacks
1214:Light-Space Modulator
1142:Redirects in hatnotes
1060:regarding the use of
515:"Alternative form of
387:on the talk pages of
256:Auto-archiving period
1232:Template:R from work
972:R with possibilities
965:1940 Summer Olympics
840:R from gap in series
440:WikiProject Redirect
352:WikiProject Redirect
134:WikiProject Redirect
1192:We have a template
835:I recently brought
799:Dead Boy Detectives
495:R to soft redirects
1072:Redirect templates
874:their own category
307:content assessment
190:dispute resolution
151:
1135:
898:
681:
631:
575:
538:
446:
445:
426:
425:
422:
421:
418:
417:
398:
287:
286:
170:Assume good faith
147:
123:
122:
106:
105:
16:(Redirected from
1266:
1211:
1205:
1201:
1195:
1131:
1125:
1118:
1069:
1063:
1055:
1054:
1012:
986:
980:
976:
970:
954:
948:
929:
911:
894:
890:
882:
844:
838:
775:
725:
716:
706:
700:
677:
673:
665:
649:
639:
627:
623:
615:
592:
571:
567:
559:
544:
536:
525:
462:
461:
435:
434:
428:
412:
411:
408:
405:
402:
374:
346:
339:
338:
328:
321:
298:
297:
296:
289:
281:
267:
266:
257:
210:
125:
112:
99:
90:
81:
72:
63:
54:
45:
36:
28:
21:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1249:
1248:
1209:
1203:
1199:
1193:
1190:
1167:
1144:
1134:
1129:
1121:
1111:
1067:
1061:
1052:
1049:
1008:
1004:
984:
978:
974:
968:
952:
946:
932:Jochem van Hees
925:
908:Paine Ellsworth
901:
888:
880:
870:Jochem van Hees
842:
836:
833:
769:
762:
719:
710:
704:
698:
690:redirecting to
671:
663:
645:
635:
621:
613:
588:
565:
557:
535:
521:
497:
459:
456:
432:
409:
406:
403:
400:
399:
386:
380:
375:This banner is
283:
282:
277:
254:
216:
215:
214:
213:
206:
202:
195:
165:
132:for discussing
107:
97:
88:
79:
70:
61:
52:
43:
34:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1272:
1270:
1262:
1261:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1246:
1207:R from product
1197:R from creator
1189:
1186:
1166:
1163:
1143:
1140:
1127:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1080:Trailblazer101
1048:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1003:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
922:
881:P.I. Ellsworth
832:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
807:recurring cast
772:TARDIS builder
761:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
695:
684:
683:
682:
664:P.I. Ellsworth
641:
614:P.I. Ellsworth
602:
601:
600:
599:
558:P.I. Ellsworth
496:
493:
455:
449:
444:
443:
436:
424:
423:
420:
419:
416:
415:
413:
410:redirect pages
382:
376:
373:
368:
361:categorization
347:
335:
334:
329:
317:
316:
310:
299:
285:
284:
275:
273:
272:
269:
268:
218:
217:
212:
211:
203:
198:
196:
194:
193:
186:
181:
172:
166:
164:
163:
152:
143:
142:
139:
138:
137:
121:
120:
115:
109:
104:
103:
101:
94:
92:
85:
83:
76:
74:
67:
65:
58:
56:
49:
47:
40:
38:
31:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1271:
1260:
1257:
1256:
1254:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1208:
1198:
1188:R to creator?
1187:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1141:
1139:
1138:
1132:
1126:
1124:
1116:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1078:. Thank you.
1077:
1073:
1066:
1059:
1058:Talk:Popverse
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:contributions
1031:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1011:
1002:Colors script
1001:
993:
990:
983:
973:
966:
962:
958:
951:
943:
942:
941:
937:
933:
928:
923:
919:
915:
909:
905:
900:
899:
897:
893:
891:
885:
884:
883:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
864:
860:
859:contributions
856:
852:
848:
841:
830:
827:
821:
817:
813:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
791:
787:
782:
781:
780:
779:
774:
773:
767:
759:
747:
743:
742:contributions
739:
735:
731:
730:
729:
726:
724:
723:
717:
715:
714:
703:
696:
693:
689:
685:
680:
676:
674:
668:
667:
666:
657:
656:
655:
652:
650:
648:
642:
638:
633:
632:
630:
626:
624:
618:
617:
616:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
598:
595:
593:
591:
585:
581:
577:
576:
574:
570:
568:
562:
561:
560:
552:
548:
542:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
526:
524:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
494:
492:
491:
487:
486:contributions
483:
479:
475:
474:
469:
465:
454:
450:
448:
441:
437:
430:
429:
414:
396:
395:
390:
385:
379:
371:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
348:
345:
341:
340:
336:
333:
330:
327:
323:
318:
314:
308:
304:
300:
291:
290:
271:
270:
265:
261:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
224:
220:
219:
209:
205:
204:
201:
191:
187:
185:
182:
180:
176:
173:
171:
168:
167:
161:
157:
156:Learn to edit
153:
150:
145:
144:
141:
140:
135:
131:
127:
126:
119:
116:
114:
113:
110:
102:
100:
95:
93:
91:
86:
84:
82:
77:
75:
73:
68:
66:
64:
59:
57:
55:
50:
48:
46:
41:
39:
37:
32:
30:
29:
19:
1191:
1168:
1145:
1122:
1112:
1050:
1009:
1005:
957:Pope John XX
878:
877:
834:
770:
766:Jayden Revri
763:
721:
720:
712:
711:
661:
660:
646:
611:
610:
589:
580:heterosexism
555:
554:
547:Special:Diff
522:
498:
472:
457:
447:
392:
384:almost never
383:
377:
369:
364:
350:
313:WikiProjects
303:project page
302:
259:
221:
128:This is the
108:
96:
959:or many of
53:Style guide
989:jnestorius
918:jnestorius
805:) and one
505:monosexism
365:discussion
359:and their
1152:Thryduulf
982:R to list
831:necessity
803:The Lodge
466:has been
389:mainspace
357:redirects
192:if needed
175:Be polite
130:talk page
98:Talk page
89:Requests
44:Templates
35:Main page
1253:Category
1175:Tule-hog
1095:Dicklyon
1076:Popverse
812:Primefac
776:★
692:Buddhism
688:Buddhist
637:see here
401:Redirect
332:Redirect
260:120 days
223:Archives
200:Shortcut
160:get help
1218:Викидим
1010:MikutoH
647:MikutoH
590:MikutoH
551:WP:NOUN
541:MikutoH
539:editor
523:MikutoH
80:Report
71:Members
1236:Gonnym
1026:voorts
914:an Rfd
904:Voorts
851:voorts
734:voorts
517:awoman
509:awomen
478:voorts
309:scale.
1123:Godsy
790:wiser
786:older
370:Note:
301:This
208:WT:RE
188:Seek
62:To do
1240:talk
1222:talk
1179:talk
1156:talk
1130:CONT
1099:talk
1084:talk
1030:talk
936:talk
906:and
855:talk
816:talk
801:and
738:talk
586:. --
482:talk
177:and
889:ed.
847:TfD
845:to
713:Pam
672:ed.
622:ed.
566:ed.
378:not
1255::
1242:)
1224:)
1216:.
1210:}}
1204:{{
1200:}}
1194:{{
1181:)
1158:)
1150:.
1119:—
1117:.
1101:)
1086:)
1068:}}
1062:{{
1036:)
985:}}
979:{{
975:}}
969:{{
953:}}
947:{{
938:)
886:,
861:)
843:}}
837:{{
818:)
788:≠
744:)
705:}}
699:{{
669:,
619:,
563:,
537:To
511:,
488:)
476:.
258::
250:,
246:,
242:,
238:,
234:,
230:,
158:;
1238:(
1220:(
1177:(
1154:(
1133:)
1097:(
1082:(
1032:/
1028:(
934:(
910::
902:@
857:/
853:(
814:(
740:/
736:(
722:D
694:.
640:.
543::
484:/
480:(
397:.
315::
252:7
248:6
244:5
240:4
236:3
232:2
228:1
225::
162:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.